Pelvic muscle activity in nulliparous volunteers

The aim of this study was to describe normal characteristics of spontaneous and voluntary pelvic muscle function in nulliparous healthy continent women and to assess the reaction of the pelvic floor to stress and fatigue. Ten nulliparous volunteers were recruited. Pelvic muscle strength was evaluated by palpation and perineal ultrasound. Kinesiological EMG and perineal ultrasound were performed to test for possible fatigue and to assess bladder neck mobility during coughing with a pre-contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. Bladder neck mobility did not increase after attempts to fatigue the pelvic floor muscles. Bladder neck descent was significantly less when the women were instructed to contract the pelvic floor muscles before coughing. The contraction of the pelvic floor muscles stabilizes the vesical neck in nulliparous women.     

Abdominal and perineal muscle reaction to an increase in intra-abdominal pressure

The aim of this study was to observe the abdominal and pelvic floor muscle reaction to an increase in intra-abdominal pressure in both continent and incontinent women. We performed a case control study using a convenience sample of 100 women, seen at two sites. Forty-eight were taken from a group of women with urinary incontinence seen at a tertiary care center, and 52 were studied during a routine gynecologic evaluation at a primary care center. The examination consisted of observation and palpation of the pelvic floor and abdomen during the command to cough and tighten the perineal muscles. The majority of incontinent (93%) and continent (92%) women allowed their perineum to bulge during a cough. The women (88% incontinent and 95% continent) also demonstrated a simultaneous bulging of their abdominal wall during coughing. Continent women exhibited statistically greater perineal strength than the incontinent women (p<0.001). The majority of women bulge their pelvic floor during the increased intra-abdominal pressure of a cough.     

Incontinent women have altered pelvic floor muscle contraction patterns

PURPOSE: Pelvic floor exercises are invaluable for regaining continence but mechanisms are not fully understood. To contribute to the understanding of these mechanisms we investigated the contraction sequence of superficial vs deep pelvic floor muscles in 6 positions in continent and incontinent women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The onset of contraction of the superficial and deep pelvic floor muscles was recorded by perineal and intravaginal surface electromyography in 32 continent and 50 incontinent women. The agreement between perineal and intravaginal recordings was calculated with the kappa statistic and the percent of agreement. Differences in onset between superficial and deep pelvic floor muscle contractions are reported as the median and IQR. RESULTS: Perineal and intravaginal electromyography recordings used to define the onset of muscle activity showed a high level of agreement. In the continent group the superficial muscles almost always contracted before the deep muscles in all 6 positions. In the incontinent group the reverse sequence was observed in 3 of 6 positions. Higher and less consistent time differences in the onset of contraction of the 2 muscle layers were found in incontinent vs continent women. CONCLUSIONS: Contractions of the superficial and deep pelvic floor muscles can be recorded by intravaginal or perineal electrodes. A consistent contraction sequence can be found in continent women but it is lacking in incontinent women. This might be a possible explanation for incontinence. Including differentiated muscle contraction exercises in pelvic floor muscle exercise programs may further optimize treatment outcomes.     

Too tight to give birth? Assessment of pelvic floor muscle function in 277 nulliparous pregnant women

Introduction and hypothesis

Theoretically, tight or strong pelvic floor muscles may impair the progress of labor and lead to instrumental deliveries. We aimed to investigate whether vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, or endurance at midpregnancy affect delivery outcome.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study of women giving birth at a university hospital. Vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and endurance in 300 nulliparous pregnant women were assessed at mean gestational week 20.8 (±1.4) using a high precision pressure transducer connected to a vaginal balloon. Delivery outcome measures [acute cesarean section, prolonged second stage of labor (> 2 h), instrumental vaginal delivery (vacuum and forceps), episiotomy, and third- and fourth-degree perineal tear) were retrieved from the hospital’s electronic birth records.

Results

Twenty-three women were lost to follow-up, mostly because they gave birth at another hospital. Women with prolonged second stage had significantly higher resting pressure than women with second stage less than 2 h; the mean difference was 4.4 cmH₂O [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2–7.6], p?<?0.01, adjusted odds ratio 1.049 (95 % CI 1.011–1.089, p?=?0.012). Vaginal resting pressure did not affect other delivery outcomes. Pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance similarly were not associated with any delivery outcomes.

Conclusions

While midpregnancy vaginal resting pressure is associated with prolonged second stage of labor, neither vaginal resting pressure nor pelvic floor muscle strength or endurance are associated with operative delivery or perineal tears. Strong pelvic floor muscles are not disadvantageous for vaginal delivery.     

Neurophysiologic effect of vaginal cone application in continent and urinary stress incontinent women

Simultaneous electromyographic (EMG) recordings with intramuscular wire electrodes from the left and right pubococcygeal muscles were performed to elucidate the neurophysiological effect of vaginal cones on the pelvic floor muscles. Ten continent nulliparous women (aged 22–32 years) and 20 stress urinary incontinent parous women (aged 27–60 years, average 2–4 deliveries) were examined before, during holding and after removal of the cone. All the continent nulliparous women could retain the cone in the vagina (mean weight 83.5 g (range 70–85 g). In the incontinent parous group 7 women could not hold any cone, 9 women could hold the 45 g cone, 1 the 32.5 g cone and 3 women the 57.5g cone. There was a significant voluntary holding time difference between continent nulliparous and incontinent parous women. The study reveals that vaginal cones may induce both strengthening of muscles as well as a learning effect leading towards a better coordinated muscle activation.Editorial Comment. This paper gives more clarification as to the (good) effect of vaginal cones. Even though Plevnik and co-authors suspected some kind of reflex activity in 1985, this study demonstrates nicely the electromyographic effects, including intermittent activation as well as possible recruitment of motor units even in previously unilateral inhibited motor units. A prerequisite of this treatment is good compliance and the ability to retain the cones, which was impossible in 7 out of 20 women.     

Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the reliability of a scoring system for the investigation of voluntary and reflex co-contractions of abdominal and pelvic floor muscles in lying, sitting, and standing positions in continent and incontinent women. METHODS: A visual inspection and digital (strength, tone, speed, and endurance) palpation scale was developed to measure the coordination of the lower abdominal and pelvic floor muscles. Inter-observer reliability of the scales was investigated in 40 continent and 40 incontinent women. Differences between the continent and incontinent group were analysed. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability for the visual inspection scale showed kappa values between 0.91 and 1.00, for tone percentage of agreement ranged from 95 to 100% (superficial) and 95 to 98% (deep muscle). Weighted Kappa (K(w)) varied from 0.77 to 0.95 for strength and 0.75 to 0.98 for the inward movement of superficial and deep pelvic floor muscles. K(w) for coordination between the superficial and deep part of the pelvic floor muscles groups was from 0.87 to 0.88 and 0.97 to 1.00 for endurance and global speed of the pelvic floor contraction. The continent women exhibited significantly better coordination between the pelvic floor and lower abdominal muscles during coughing in all three positions. Also the superficial part of the inward movement, the feeling and the coordination of the pelvic floor muscles were significantly better in the continent group. CONCLUSIONS: Visual inspection and digital tests are easy and reliable methods by which insight can be gained into the multi-muscular activity and coordination of the pelvic floor and lower abdominal muscles in continent and incontinent women.     

Assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in continent and incontinent women using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing and vaginal squeeze pressure measurements

The aims of the study were: (1) to assess women performing voluntary pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions, on initial instruction without biofeedback teaching, using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing, and perineometry and (2) to assess for associations between the different measurements of PFM function. Sixty continent (30 nulliparous and 30 parous) and 60 incontinent (30 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 30 urge urinary incontinence (UUI)) women were assessed. Bladder neck depression during attempts to perform an elevating pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction occurred in 17% of continent and 30% of incontinent women. The UUI group had the highest proportion of women who depressed the bladder neck (40%), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.060). The continent women were stronger on manual muscle testing (p=0.001) and perineometry (p=0.019) and had greater PFM endurance (p<0.001) than the incontinent women. There was a strong tendency for the continent women to have a greater degree of bladder neck elevation than the incontinent women (p=0.051). There was a moderate correlation between bladder neck movement during PFM contraction measured by ultrasound and PFM strength assessed by manual muscle testing (r=0.58, p=0.01) and perineometry (r=0.43, p=0.01). The observation that many women were performing PFM exercises incorrectly reinforces the need for individual PFM assessment with a skilled practitioner. The significant correlation between the measurements of bladder neck elevation during PFM contraction and PFM strength measured using MMT and perineometry supports the use of ultrasound in the assessment of PFM function; however, the correlation was only moderate and, therefore, indicates that the different measurement tools assess different aspects of PFM function. It is recommended that physiotherapists use a combination of assessment tools to evaluate the different aspects of PFM function that are important for continence. Ultrasound is useful to determine the direction of pelvic floor movement in the clinical assessment of pelvic floor muscle function in a mixed subject population.     

Are fatigue and disturbances in pre‐programmed activity of pelvic floor muscles associated with female stress urinary incontinence?

AIMS: To investigate whether there is a difference between a continent versus a stress urinary incontinent group of women regarding: (i) fatigue in pelvic floor muscles, and (ii) pre-activation times between pelvic floor and abdominal muscles during coughing. METHODS: Twenty-six continent and 20 stress urinary incontinent parous women were examined. Fatigue was measured with an intravaginal device. Time to 10% decline of the initial reference force (RF) was defined as time-to-fatigue. Simultaneous recordings of force developed in levator ani muscle and electromyographic activity in the external oblique abdominal muscle were performed to determine whether contraction of pelvic floor muscles precedes activity in abdominal muscles during coughing. RESULTS: Time-to-fatigue was identical in the two groups (10.5 sec in the continent and 11.5 sec in the incontinent group, median values). Normalized force was significantly reduced in the incontinent group. The pelvic floor muscles contracted 160 msec before the abdominal muscles in both groups. In 24% of the continent and in 30% of the incontinent women, however, abdominal muscle activity preceded activity of pelvic floor muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Muscular fatigue, defined as rate of force loss, does not seem to be associated with urinary stress incontinence. Moreover, muscular activity recruitment patterns were equal in both groups suggesting that other factors than disturbances of ordered muscle recruitment, that is, pelvic floor followed by abdominal muscles, may be responsible for stress urinary incontinence. It is likely that reduced normalized force, as found in the incontinent group, is an important contributing factor.     

Altered muscle activation patterns in symptomatic women during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva manouevre

AIMS: To investigate the muscle activation patterns of the abdomino-pelvic region used by incontinent women during a pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction and a Valsalva manouevre compared to healthy, asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: Thirteen incontinent (symptomatic) women, identified using ultrasound to be consistently depressing the bladder base during PFM contraction, and thirteen continent women (asymptomatic) able to perform an elevating PFM contraction were assessed using surface electromyography (EMG) of the PFM, abdominal and chest wall muscles and vaginal and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements during PFM contraction and Valsalva under ultrasound surveillance. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in age, parity or BMI. There was a difference in muscle activation patterns between groups (P = 0.001). During PFM contraction the PFM were less active and the abdominal and chest wall muscles were more active in the symptomatic group. During Valsalva, the PFM and EO were more active in the symptomatic group but there was no difference in the activation of the other muscles between groups. There was a significant interaction (group x pressure) for change in IAP (P = 0.047) but no significant interaction for change in vaginal pressure (VP) (P = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS: The symptomatic women displayed altered muscle activation patterns when compared to the asymptomatic group. The symptomatic women were unable to perform a voluntary PFM contraction using a localized muscle strategy, instead activating all the muscles of the abdomino-pelvic cavity. The potential for muscle substitution strategies reinforces the need for close attention to specificity when prescribing PFM exercise programs.     

Effects of pelvic floor muscle training on strength and predictors of response in the treatment of urinary incontinence

AIMS: The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the effect of training on pelvic floor muscle strength; (2) to determine whether changes in pelvic floor muscle strength correlate with changes in continence; and (3) to determine whether demographic characteristics, clinical incontinence severity indices, or urodynamic measures predict response to pelvic floor muscle training. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four women with urinary incontinence (95=genuine stress incontinence [GSI]; 19=detrusor instability [DI]; 20=mixed incontinence [GSI+DI]) were randomized to pelvic floor muscle training (n=67) or bladder training (n=67). Urinary diaries, urodynamic evaluation, and vaginal pressure measurements by using balloon manometry were performed at baseline and after 12 weeks of therapy. Primary outcome measures consisted of incontinent episodes per week and vaginal pressure measurements. RESULTS: Both treatment groups had a reduction in incontinent episodes (P相似文献   

The vaginal pressure profile

AIMS: To describe the vaginal pressure profile in asymptomatic nulliparous women. METHODS: Fourteen nulliparous women without symptoms of anal or urinary incontinence were studied with vaginal manometry. A rapid pull-through technique utilized a four-channel water-perfused catheter on a motor-driven puller to create a pressure profile for each subject. The profiles were measured with the subject at rest and during a sustained contraction of the levator ani muscle. The individual subject's pressure profiles were averaged to create a composite profile at rest and during squeeze. RESULTS: The vaginal pressure profile at rest and during squeeze contains three pressure zones: proximal, mid, and distal. The pressure is highest in the mid pressure zone and was labeled as the vaginal high-pressure zone. In the vaginal high-pressure zone, the maximum pressure during squeeze is significantly higher than the maximum pressure at rest (P < 0.05). The length of the high-pressure zone is longer during squeeze as compared to rest (P < 0.05). The maximum pressures exhibit circumferential asymmetry with the pressures in anterior and posterior directions being significantly higher than those in the lateral directions (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The vaginal pressure profile is more complex than previously described. Understanding of the vaginal pressure profile is crucial when employing vaginal manometry to assess pelvic floor muscle strength or as a surrogate for intra-abdominal pressure.     

Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Using Four Different Techniques

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether four different techniques were able to correctly measure pelvic floor muscle strength only. Sixteen volunteers performed a set of muscle contractions using the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) only, the abdominal muscles with and without PFM, gluteal muscles with and without PFM, adductor muscles with and without PFM and Valsalva maneuver with and without PFM. Pelvic floor muscle strength was evaluated by digital palpation, intravaginal EMG, pressure perineometry and perineal ultrasound. A “non-pelvic muscle induced” reading was defined as a significant increase even though the pelvic floor muscles were not contracted. Results were as follows: isolated abdominal muscle contraction: non-pelvic muscle induced readings in 3/8 women with EMG and in 3/8 with pressure perineometry; isolated gluteal muscle contraction: non-pelvic muscle induced readings in 1/2 women with EMG perineometry; isolated adductor muscle contraction: non-pelvic muscle induced readings in 6/11 women with EMG perineometry and in 2/11 women with pressure perineometry; Valsalva maneuver: non-pelvic muscle induced readings in 4/9 women with EMG perineometry and 9/9 women with pressure perineometry. It was concluded that EMG and pressure perineometry do not selectively depict pelvic floor muscle activity.     

Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients

The aim of this study was to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and perception and its correlation with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). One hundred and one women were divided into two groups according to the presence (G1=51 patients) or absence (G2=50 patients) of SUI. Subjective [urine stream interruption test (UST), visual survey of perineal contraction and transvaginal digital palpation to assess pelvic muscle contraction] and objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscles in all patients were performed (vaginal manometry). During the UST, 25.5% of G1 patients and 80% of G2 patients were able to interrupt the urine stream (p<0.05). Digital evaluation of pelvic muscular contraction showed higher strength in G2 than in G1 patients (p<0.0001). Perineometer evaluation of PFM strength was significantly higher in the continent group (p<0.001). Pelvic floor muscle weakness in incontinent patients demonstrates the importance of functional and objective evaluation of this group of muscles.This revised version was published online in February 2005 with corrections to the third authors name. The name of this author, De Oliveira Orsi Gameiro M, was not correctly rendered in the original version.     

Continence and pelvic floor status in nulliparous women at midterm pregnancy

Introduction and hypothesis

A Cochrane review recommends antenatal pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in urinary incontinence (UI) prevention. The aim of the study was to investigate nulliparous pregnant women’s knowledge about and practising of PFMT, their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, and ability to contract correctly. It was hypothesized that continent women had higher PFM strength and endurance than women with UI.

Methods

Three hundred nulliparous women at gestational week 18–22 were included in a cross-sectional study. Vaginal resting pressure, maximum voluntary contraction, and PFM endurance were measured by manometer. UI was assessed by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). Comparisons of PFM function in continent women and women with UI were analyzed using independent-samples t test. Mean differences with 95?% confidence interval (CI) are presented.

Results

Of 300 women, 89?% had heard of PFMT at mid pregnancy, and 35?% performed PFMT once or more a week. After thorough instruction 4?% were unable to contract correctly. Thirty-five percent reported UI, of whom 48?% performed PFMT once or more a week. Continent women had significantly higher PFM strength and endurance when compared with women having UI, with mean differences of 6.6 cmH₂O (CI 2.3–10.8, p?=?0.003), and 41.5 cmH₂Osec (CI 9.8–73.1, p?=?0.010), respectively. No difference was found for vaginal resting pressure (p?=?0.054).

Conclusions

Most nulliparous pregnant women knew about PFMT. Thirty-five percent performed PFMT once or more a week. Incontinent nulliparous pregnant women had weaker PFM than their continent counterparts. More emphasis on information regarding PFM function and PFMT is warranted during pregnancy.     

Urethral pressure response patterns induced by squeeze in continent and incontinent women

Our aim was to compare the urethral pressure response pattern to pelvic floor muscle contractions in 20–27 years old, nulliparous continent women (n = 31) to that of continent (n = 28) and formerly untreated incontinent (n = 59) (53–63 years old) women. These women underwent urethral pressure measurements during rest and repeated pelvic muscle contractions. The response to the contractions was graded 0–4. The young continent women showed a mean urethral pressure response of 2.8, the middle-aged continent women 2.2 (NS vs young continent), and the incontinent women 1.5 (p < 0.05 vs middle-aged continent, p < 0.001 vs young continent). Urethral pressures during rest were significantly higher in the younger women than in both groups of middle-aged women. The decreased ability to increase urethral pressure on demand seen in middle-aged incontinent women compared to continent women of the same age as well as young women seems to be a consequence of a neuromuscular disorder rather than of age.     

盆底障碍性疾病盆底自主收缩肌肉力量研究

目的比较正常人和盆底障碍性疾病(PFD)患者的盆底肌肉功能。方法对2007年11月至2008年4月在本院就诊的压力性尿失禁(SUI)、盆腔器官脱垂(POP)、POP合并SUI患者以及健康对照组各10例,行阴道指诊、阴道挤压力检测盆底肌肉收缩力量进行评估。结果肛提肌肌肉指诊力量和阴道挤压力呈正相关(r=0.549,P<0.05)。对照组阴道指诊肌力等级为(4.1±0.8),阴道挤压压力为(38.4±21.1)mmH2O,15 s内可自主收缩肛提肌(6.0±1.2)次,收缩持续时间为(4.78±1.78)s。SUI组、POP组、SUI+POP组阴道指诊肌力等级分别为(2.6±0.7)(、3.2±1.2)和(3.0±1.4),均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);阴道内挤压压力分别为(20.2±11.1)、(13.8±10.3)、(20.0±10.4)mmH2O,均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。SUI组15 s内可自主收缩肛提肌(3.6±1.0)次,显著少于对照组(P<0.05),收缩持续时间为(2.40±1.35)s,与对照组比较显著缩短(P<0.05)。结论肛提肌的阴道指诊的肌力测定,简单易行,可在临床广泛应用。PFD患者普遍存在肛提肌肉收缩力量减弱。SUI患者收缩速率慢、收缩持续时间短,不能对抗连续的腹压增高可能是SUI的发病机制。     

Effectiveness of adding voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction to a Pilates exercise program: an assessor-masked randomized controlled trial

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adding voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) to a Pilates exercise program in sedentary nulliparous women.

Methods

Fifty-seven healthy nulliparous and physically inactive women were randomized to a Pilates exercise program (PEP) with or without PFMC. Forty-eight women concluded this study (24 participants for each group). Each woman was evaluated before and after the PEP, by a physiotherapist and an urogynecologist (UG). Neither of the professionals was revealed to them. This physiotherapist measured their pelvic floor muscle strength by using both a perineometer (Peritron) and vaginal palpation (Oxford Scale). The UG, who performed 3D perineal ultrasound examinations, collected their data and evaluated the results for pubovisceral muscle thickness and the levator hiatus area (LA). Both professionals were blinded to the group allocation. The protocol for both groups consisted of 24 bi-weekly 1-h individual sessions of Pilates exercises, developed by another physiotherapist who specializes in PFM rehabilitation and the Pilates technique.

Results

The PEP+ PFMC group showed significantly greater strength improvements than the PEP group when comparing the Oxford scale, vaginal pressure and pubovisceral muscle thickness during contraction measurements at baseline and post-treatment.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that adding a voluntary PFMC to a Pilates exercise program is more effective than Pilates alone in improving PFM strength in sedentary nulliparous women.

     

Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength in nulliparous women and those with normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section

Introduction and hypothesis

Weakness of the pelvic floor is quite common among women, and may occur following childbirth. The aim of this study was to compare pelvic floor muscle strength in women of reproductive age who were nulliparous or who had a cesarean section or normal vaginal delivery.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 341 women including 96 nulliparous women, 73 women with a history of normal vaginal delivery with and without episiotomy, and 172 women with a history of elective or emergency cesarean section were recruited randomly from public health centers in Ahvaz, Iran. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire and a checklist was used to record weight, height, body mass index, and pelvic floor muscle strength. Pelvic floor muscle strength was measured with the woman in the lithotomy position using a Peritron 9300 V perineometer. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, the least significant difference test and the chi-squared test.

Results

The nulliparous women had the highest mean pelvic muscle strength (55.62?±?15.86 cm?H₂O). Women who had vaginal delivery with episiotomy had the lowest pelvic muscle strength (32.71?±?14 cm?H₂O). In nulliparous women pelvic floor muscle strength was higher than in women who had normal vaginal delivery with episiotomy (p?<?0.001), but was not significantly different from that in women with normal vaginal delivery without episiotomy or in women with cesarean section (elective or emergency, p?=?0.245).

Conclusions

Nulliparous women had the highest pelvic floor muscle strength and there was no significant difference in pelvic floor muscle strength between women with normal vaginal delivery and those with cesarean section.

     

Can simultaneous perineal sonography and urethrocystometry help explain urethral pressure variations?

Objective: To correlate urodynamic with perineal sonographic findings in pressure variations. Patients and methods: In 15 women presenting with urethral pressure variations a urodynamic evaluation with water filling cystometry, urethral pressure at rest and during coughing and uroflowmetry were performed. During water filling cystometry, there were simultaneous perineal video-sonography and urethrocystometry. Video ultrasound images and urodynamic curves were simultaneously monitored on a computer screen. Results: Simultaneous ultrasound and urodynamic evaluation in the 15 patients revealed movements in two areas leading to urethral pressure variations: activity of the pelvic floor muscles and of the urethral sphincter muscles. For the pelvic floor, we found either slow or fast contractions with, respectively, slow (15–30 cm H₂O for 3–10 sec) or fast (30–130 cm H₂O for 1–3 sec) urethral pressure changes. Urethral sphincter contractions were always fast, resulting in fast pressure changes of 30–170 cm H₂O for 1–3 sec. Conclusion: Evaluation of simultaneous perineal sonography and urethrocystometry shows the association of urethral pressure variations and muscle activity. Urethral pressure variations are caused by the activity of urethral sphincter or pelvic floor muscles. With ultrasound the activity of the urethral sphincter muscle can directly be seen whereas pelvic floor muscle activity is indirectly visible. Pelvic floor muscle contractions are either fast or slow, whereas the urethral sphincter muscle contractions are always fast contractions.     

Pelvic floor muscle function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women using dynamometric measurements

AIMS: To compare the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women using dynamometric measurements. METHODS: Thirty continent women and 59 women suffering from stress urinary incontinence (SUI), aged between 21 and 44 and parous, participated in the study. An instrumented speculum was used to assess the static parameters of the PFM: (1) passive force at 19 and 24 mm of vaginal aperture (antero-posterior diameter), (2) maximal strength in a self-paced effort at both apertures, (3) rate of force development and number of contractions during a protocol of rapidly repeated 15-sec contractions, and lastly (4) absolute endurance recorded over a 90-sec period during a sustained maximal contraction. The parameters described in the two latter conditions were assessed at the aperture of 19 mm. Analyses of covariance were used to control the confounding variables of age and parity when comparing the PFM function in the continent and incontinent women. RESULTS: The continent women demonstrated higher passive force at both openings and a higher absolute endurance as compared to the incontinent women (P < or = 0.01). In the protocol of rapidly repeated contractions, the rate of force development and number of contractions were both lower in the incontinent subjects (P < or = 0.01). The differences between the two groups for maximal strength at the 19- and 24-mm apertures did not reach the statistically significant level. CONCLUSIONS: The PFM function is impaired in incontinent women. The assessment of PFM should not be restricted to maximal strength. Other parameters that discriminate between continent and incontinent women need to be added to the PFM assessment in both clinical and research settings.