Possible beneficial effect of fish and fish n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in breast and colorectal cancer.

Breast and colorectal cancer are main causes of death in industrialized countries. In these cancers dietary factors appear to play beneficial or adverse roles. One of the possible beneficial factors may be fish intake or the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids from fish, as found in epidemiological and clinical studies. In population studies, high intake of fish during many years is associated with reduced risks of breast and colorectal cancer. Prospective and case-control studies either do not show an association between fish intake and cancer risks or show reduced risks at high fish intakes. In these studies, fish consumption may have been too low or may not reflect fish consumption over a longer period. In population, case-control, and prospective studies, fish and fish n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids were not found to increase cancer risks. Clinical studies on markers of colorectal cancer indicate that fish n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may reduce cancer risk. In several studies in which the effect of fish consumption on cancer risk was investigated, meat and meat products were positively related to cancer risk, suggesting that cancer risks might be reduced more effectively when meat and meat products in meals are replaced by fish. In conclusion, the existing knowledge suggests that an increase in the consumption of fish and fish n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in industrialized countries may contribute to lower breast and colorectal cancer risks.     

Meat and fat intake and pancreatic cancer risk in the Netherlands Cohort Study

Meat contains numerous carcinogens, such as heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and N‐nitroso compounds, which can be derived either from natural food or during the process of food preparation. These carcinogens may increase pancreatic cancer risk. Furthermore, studies in animals showed that polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially linoleic acid, increase pancreatic cancer risk. We examined prospectively the relation between pancreatic cancer risk and intake of fresh meat, processed meat, fish, eggs, total fat, and different types of fat. The Netherlands Cohort Study consisted of 120,852 men and women who completed a baseline questionnaire in 1986. After 13.3 years of follow‐up, 350 pancreatic cancer cases (66% microscopically confirmed) were available for analysis. A validated 150‐item food‐frequency questionnaire was used to calculate intake of fresh meat, processed meat, fish, eggs, fat and different types of fat. No association was found when examining the association between intake of fresh meat, other types of meat, fish, eggs, dietary intake of total fat and different types of fat and risk of pancreatic cancer. It is important for future studies to investigate the relation between different meat‐cooking methods and pancreatic cancer. © 2009 UICC     

Meat, fish and fat intake in relation to subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study

High intake of red meat has been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in Western countries. There has been much interest in the role of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in colorectal cancer prevention, but epidemiological findings are limited and inconsistent. The objective of our study was to examine associations of meat, fish and fat intake with risk of colorectal cancer, paying particular attention to the subsite within the colorectum. Data were from the Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study, covering 782 cases and 793 controls. Diet was assessed by interview, using newly developed personal-computer software for registering semiquantitative food frequencies. The intake of beef/pork, processed meat, total fat, saturated fat or n-6 PUFA showed no clear association with the overall or subsite-specific risk of colorectal cancer. There was an almost significant inverse association between n-3 PUFA and the risk of colorectal cancer; the covariate-adjusted odds ratio for the highest (median 3.94 g/day) versus lowest (median 1.99 g/day) quintile of energy-adjusted intake was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.06, trend P=0.050). The consumption of fish and fish products was similarly inversely related to the risk although the association was not statistically significant. These associations were more evident for distal colon cancer; adjusted odds ratio for the highest versus lowest quintile of n-3 PUFA intake was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.34-0.92, trend P=0.02). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that consumption of red meat increases colorectal cancer risk but do suggest that high intake of fish may decrease the risk, particularly of distal colon cancer.     

Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men

Objectives: Based on previous epidemiological studies, high fat and meat consumption may increase and fiber, calcium, and vegetable consumption may decrease the risk of colorectal cancer. We sought to address these hypotheses in a male Finnish cohort.Methods: We analyzed data from the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study (ATBC Study) where 27, 111 male smokers completed a validated dietary questionnaire at baseline. After an average of 8 years of follow-up, we documented 185 cases of colorectal cancer. The analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards model.Results: The relative risk (RR) for men in the highest quartile of calcium intake compared with men in the lowest quartile was 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.9, p for trend 0.04). Likewise, the intake of milk protein and the consumption of milk products was inversely associated with risk of colorectal cancer. However, intake of dietary fiber was not associated with risk, nor was fat intake. Consumption of meat or different types of meat, and fried meat, fruits or vegetables were not associated with risk.Conclusions: In this cohort of men consuming a diet high in fat, meat, and fiber and low in vegetables, high calcium intake was associated with lowered risk of colorectal cancer.     

Dietary fats and colon cancer: Assessment of risk associated with specific fatty acids

There are many biological mechanisms whereby dietary fat and specific dietary fatty acids may alter risk of colon cancer in addition to their contribution to total energy intake. To evaluate these potential associations, we used detailed dietary intake data collected in a population-based study of 1,993 incident colon cancer cases and 2,410 controls conducted in 3 areas of the United States. The most commonly consumed fatty acid in the study population was oleic acid. One-third of dietary fats consumed came from additions to other foods at the table or from the preparation of other foods. After adjusting for total energy intake, physical activity and body size, neither total dietary fat nor specific fatty acids was associated with risk of colon cancer. However, among older women, fats from food preparation were associated with increased risk of colon cancer (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20–2.80), while fats from foods themselves or from additions to other foods were not. While dietary fats were not associated with colon cancer risk in the total population, subgroups of the population appeared to be at slightly greater risk if they consumed a high-fat diet. Women who consumed a diet high in mono-unsaturated fatty acids (MFAs) and poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PFAs) and who had a family history of colorectal cancer were at greater risk of colon cancer than those with similar intakes but without a family history of colorectal cancer. Similar associations with family history were noted among men diagnosed at younger ages for MFA, linolenic acid and 20-carbon PFA. Int. J. Cancer 73:670–677, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Meat consumption, heterocyclic amines and colorectal cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Greater consumption of red and processed meat has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in several recent meta-analyses. Heterocyclic amines (HCAs) have been hypothesized to underlie this association. In this prospective analysis conducted within the Multiethnic Cohort Study, we examined whether greater consumption of total, red or processed meat was associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among 165,717 participants who completed a detailed food frequency questionnaire at baseline. In addition, we examined whether greater estimated intake of HCAs was associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among 131,763 participants who completed a follow-up questionnaire that included a meat-cooking module. A total of 3,404 and 1,757 invasive colorectal cancers were identified from baseline to the end of follow-up and from the date of administration of the meat-cooking module to the end of follow-up, respectively. Proportional hazard models were used to estimate basic and multivariable-adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals for colorectal cancer associated with dietary exposures. In multivariable models, no association with the risk of colorectal cancer was detected for density-adjusted total meat (RR(Q5 vs. Q1) = 0.93 [0.83-1.05]), red meat (RR = 1.02 [0.91-1.16]) or processed meat intake (RR = 1.06 [0.94-1.19]) or for total (RR = 0.90 [0.76-1.05]) or specific HCA intake whether comparing quintiles of dietary exposure or using continuous variables. Although our results do not support a role for meat or for HCAs from meat in the etiology of colorectal cancer, we cannot rule out the possibility of a modest effect.     

Relationship of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men.

BACKGROUND: Rates of colorectal cancer in various countries are strongly correlated with per-capita consumption of red meat and animal fat and inversely associated with fiber consumption. There have been few studies, however, of dietary risk factors for colorectal adenomas, which are precursors of cancer. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine prospectively the relationship between dietary factors and risk of colorectal adenomas. METHODS: Using data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, we documented 170 cases of adenomas of the left colon or rectum in 7284 male health professionals who completed a food-frequency questionnaire in 1986 and who had a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy between 1986 and 1988. Relative risk (RR) of adenoma was determined according to quintiles of nutrient intakes. RESULTS: After adjustment for total energy intake, saturated fat was positively associated with risk of colorectal adenoma (P for trend = .006); RR for the highest versus the lowest quintile of intake was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-3.2). Dietary fiber was inversely associated with risk of adenoma (P for trend less than .0001); RR for men in the highest versus the lowest quintile was 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22-0.60). All sources of fiber (vegetables, fruits, and grains) were associated with decreased risk of adenoma. For subjects on a high-saturated fat, low-fiber diet, the RR was 3.7 (95% CI = 1.5-8.8) compared with those on a low-saturated fat, high-fiber diet. The ratio of the intake of red meat to the intake of chicken and fish was positively associated with risk of adenoma (P for trend = .02). CONCLUSIONS: These prospective data provide evidence for the hypothesis that a diet high in saturated fat and low in fiber increases the risk of colorectal adenoma. They also support existing recommendations to substitute chicken and fish for red meat in the diet and to increase intake of vegetables, fruits, and grains to reduce risk of colorectal cancer.     

A case-control study of diet and the risk of ovarian cancer.

Epidemiologic studies have suggested that some dietary factors may play a role in the etiology of ovarian cancer, but the findings have been inconsistent. We assessed the association of ovarian cancer with dietary factors in a population-based case-control study in Canada. Diet information was collected on 442 incident cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed in 1994 to 1997 and 2,135 population controls via a self-administered questionnaire. Compared with women in the lowest quartile of cholesterol intake, those in the second, third, and fourth quartiles had a multivariate adjusted odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)] of 1.12 (0.81-1.56), 1.20 (0.85-1.68), and 1.42 (1.03-1.97), respectively (P for trend = 0.031). Higher egg consumption was also associated with a nonsignificant increase in ovarian cancer risk. The ORs (95% CIs) for ovarian cancer were 0.77 (0.60-1.04) and 0.76 (0.56-0.99) among women in the highest quartile of total vegetable and cruciferous vegetable intake as compared with women in the lowest quartile. Women who took supplements of vitamin E, beta-carotene, and B-complex vitamins for > or =10 years had ORs (95% CIs) of 0.49 (0.30-0.81), 0.31 (0.11-0.91), and 0.61 (0.36-1.05), respectively. However, we did not observe an association of ovarian cancer risk with dietary fat intake, including saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, protein, carbohydrate, dietary fiber, fruit, dairy products, meat products, fish, chicken, grain products, nut products, baked desserts, margarine, butter, mayonnaise, and supplement of multiple vitamins, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, iron, zinc, and selenium. Our findings suggested that ovarian cancer risk was positively associated with higher consumption of dietary cholesterol and eggs and inversely associated with higher intake of total vegetables and cruciferous vegetables and supplementation of vitamin E, beta-carotene, and B-complex vitamins.     

Diet and adenocarcinoma of the lung: a case-control study in Uruguay.

With the objective of examining the relationship between diet and adenocarcinoma of the lung, a case-control study was carried out in Uruguay. Red meat, total meat and fatty foods were associated with a significant increase in risk (odds ratios (OR) for red meat intake 1.92, 95% CI 1.27-2.90). On the other hand, fruits, tubers and all plant foods displayed significant inverse associations with adenocarcinoma of the lung (OR for total plant foods 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.61). Among nutrients, total fat, other fats (saturated fat) and cholesterol were associated with an increased risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung (OR for high consumption of total fat 2.28, 95% CI 1.48-3.54). The risk associated with cholesterol intake was even higher after controlling for total fat, suggesting that both nutrients (fat and cholesterol) have independent effects. Carotenoids and vitamin E displayed significantly protective effects. This effect was markedly attenuated, when these micronutrients were adjusted for total plant intake. Furthermore, red meat, fat, and cholesterol showed attenuation in its effects after adjustment for total plant foods. It could be concluded that tobacco smoking is the strongest risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the lung. Low consumption of plant foods, and in a lesser degree, high consumption of red meat, total fat and cholesterol contribute to a high risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

Premenopausal dietary fat in relation to pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer

We examined the association between fat intake and breast cancer incidence in the Nurses’ Health Study II. We followed 88,804 women aged 26–45 years from 1991 to 2011 and documented incident breast cancers. Dietary fat, assessed by questionnaires in 1991, was examined in relation to total, premenopausal, and postmenopausal breast cancers. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). During 20 years of follow-up, 2,830 incident invasive breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Total fat intake was not associated with risk of breast cancer overall. After adjustment for demographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, and dietary factors, a positive association was observed between animal fat intake and breast cancer overall (RR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.18; 95 % CI 1.04–1.33; P _trend = 0.01). A positive association with animal fat intake was also seen among premenopausal women, but not among postmenopausal women. Higher intakes of saturated fat and monounsaturated fat were each associated with modestly higher breast cancer risk among all women, and higher cholesterol intake was associated with higher premenopausal breast cancer risk. However, the associations of saturated fat, monounsaturated fat and animal fat, were attenuated and non-significant after adjustment for red meat intake. Intakes of other types of fat including vegetable fat, dairy fat, polyunsaturated fat, and trans fat were not associated with breast cancer risk. Our finding suggests a positive association between early adult intake of animal fat and breast cancer risk.     

Dietary intakes of fat and fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study in Japan

To examine the possible association of dietary fat and fatty acids with breast cancer risk in a population with a low total fat intake and a high consumption of fish, we analyzed data from the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study. From 1988 to 1990, 26 291 women aged 40-79 years completed a questionnaire on dietary and other factors. Intakes of fat or fatty acids were estimated by using a food frequency questionnaire. Rate ratios (RR) were computed by fitting proportional hazards models. During the mean follow-up of 7.6 years, 129 breast cancer cases were documented. We found no clear association of total fat intake with breast cancer risk; the multivariate-adjusted RR across quartiles were 1.00, 1.29, 0.95, and 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.38). A significant decrease in the risk was detected for the highest quartile of intake compared with the lowest for fish fat and long-chain n-3 fatty acids; the RR were 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.94) and 0.50 (0.30-0.85), respectively. A decreasing trend in risk was also suggested with an increasing intake of saturated fatty acids (trend P = 0.066). Among postmenopausal women at baseline, the highest quartile of vegetable fat intake was associated with a 2.08-fold increase in risk (95% CI 1.05-4.13). This prospective study did not support any increase in the risk of breast cancer associated with total or saturated fat intake, but it suggested the protective effects of the long-chain n-3 fatty acids that are abundant in fish.     

Meat intake, heterocyclic amines and risk of colorectal cancer

A case-control study was conducted in Uruguay, in order to investigate the relationship between heterocyclic amine intake and colorectal cancer risk. The study included 250 cases of colorectal cancer and 500 controls, frequency-matched with the cases on age, sex, and residence. A significant increase in risk of colorectal cancer associated with red meat, beef and fried meat was observed. Heterocyclic amines were associated with a significant increase in the risk of colorectal cancer in males and females. This increased risk persisted after controlling for total energy, total meat and total fat intake. On the other hand, total meat and total fat intake were not longer significant. This latter finding suggests that heterocyclic amine exposure is central in colorectal carcinogenesis.     

Red meat and colon cancer: dietary haem, but not fat, has cytotoxic and hyperproliferative effects on rat colonic epithelium

High intake of red meat is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer. It has been suggested that fat from red meat is responsible, because high fat intake increases the concentration of cytotoxic lipids in the colon. Experimental studies have not unequivocally supported such a role for fat, however. Recently, we showed that dietary haem, which is abundant in red meat, increased colonic cytotoxicity and epithelial proliferation. In this study, we wanted to clarify whether dietary fat affects colon cancer risk by itself or by modulating the detrimental effects of haem on the colonic epithelium. Rats were fed control or haem-supplemented diets with 10%, 25% or 40% of the energy derived from fat for 14 days. Faeces were collected for biochemical analyses. Colonic cytotoxicity was determined from the degree of lysis of erythrocytes by faecal water. Colonic epithelial proliferation was measured in vivo using [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. Increasing the fat content of the control diets stimulated faecal disposal of both fatty acids and bile acids. It also increased the concentration of fatty acids, but not that of bile acids, in faecal water in control rats. The cytolytic activity of faecal water and colonic epithelial proliferation were unaffected. Dietary haem increased faecal cation content and cytolytic activity of faecal water at all fat levels, suggesting that the colonic mucosa was exposed to high amounts of luminal irritants. This effect was smaller in rats on the low-fat diet. Dietary haem also increased colonic epithelial proliferation at all fat levels. The haem-induced effects were independent of fatty acids or bile acids in the faecal water. In western societies, 30-40% of ingested energy is supplied by dietary fat, so our results suggest that the association between consumption of red meat and risk of colon cancer is mainly due to its haem content, and is largely independent of dietary fat content.     

Correlation between Food Consumption and Colorectal Cancer: An Ecological Analysis in Japan

Objectives: Incidence rates for colorectal cancer are universally high in western countries while values in theorient are very variable. Japan is one of the oriental countries with a high incidence but any association with foodcomponents remains to be clarified. To explore specific nutrient effects on risk of colorectal cancer in Japan, we hereconducted a correlation analysis between change in the diet and incidence rates.Methods: Incidence data for 1976-1996 and national values for per capita daily food nutrient intake in 1956-1995were used. We first analyzed chronological changes of food nutrients and colorectal cancer, and then calculatedcorrelation coefficients with time lags of 5, 10, 15 or 20 years. To adjust for the confounding effects of total energy, wealso performed a partial correlation analysis.Results: Incidences of colorectal cancer gradually increased during 1976-1996 with the highest incidence ratesfor colon and rectal cancers, 25.31 and 13.75 per 100,000, respectively, in 1996. Food nutrient intake also demonstratedmajor variation during 1956-1995, total fats and oils increasing most, followed by animal protein and animal fats.Incidences of colorectal cancer were positively associated with fat and oil intake, of both plant and animal types; apositive link was noted with animal protein but the association with plant protein consumption was inverse, as wasalso the case for carbohydrate and cereals; no simple association was evident with total energy intake.Conclusions: Food nutrients play roles in risk of colon and rectal cancers. Lower animal protein and fat intake,and higher carbohydrate and cereal consumption might reduce the risk of colon and rectal cancers.     

A 22-year Prospective Study of Fish, n-3 Fatty Acid Intake, and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men.

BACKGROUND: Fish is the main dietary source of long-chain n-3 fatty acids, which have been suggested to play a protective role in colorectal cancer development in laboratory and animal studies. Human studies have not shown consistent results. We examined the association between intakes of fish and n-3 fatty acids from fish and colorectal cancer risk in men enrolled in the Physicians' Health Study. METHODS: The Physicians' Health Study began as a randomized trial to examine the effect of aspirin and beta-carotene supplementation on cancer and cardiovascular disease. Fish intake was assessed at the 12-month follow-up with an abbreviated food-frequency questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariate relative risks for colorectal cancer for the categories of fish intake and quartiles of n-3 fatty acid intake. RESULTS: During 22 years of follow-up, 500 men had a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Fish intake was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk [multivariate relative risk (95% confidence interval) for highest versus lowest category, 0.60 (0.40-0.91); P trend = 0.01]. The inverse association was observed for both colon and rectal cancers. Our findings for n-3 fatty acids were similar to those for fish; the multivariate relative risk (95% confidence interval) of total colorectal cancer for the highest versus lowest quartile of n-3 fatty acids was 0.74 (0.57-0.95; P trend = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results from this long-term prospective study suggest that intakes of fish and long-chain n-3 fatty acids from fish may decrease the risk for colorectal cancer.     

Dietary and biomarker estimates of fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer

The associations between intake of or circulating fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) are unclear. We examined prospectively the associations between dietary or biomarker fatty acids and CRC. For 41,514 men and women, aged 40–69 years, baseline (1990–94) dietary intakes of fatty acids were estimated using a food frequency questionnaire and plasma phospholipid (PPL) fatty acids were measured for 4,205 participants including 395 CRC cases, according to a case‐cohort design. Hazard ratios were computed using Cox regression adjusting for education, alcohol intake, smoking status, physical activity and total energy intake; and stratified for gender, ethnicity and family history of cancer, with age as the time scale. We assessed the heterogeneity of associations with colon and rectal cancers. PPL saturated fatty acids (SFAs) were positively associated with CRC risk, while total n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and long chain marine n‐3 PUFAs showed inverse associations, significant only for 22:5 n‐3. No significant associations were observed for dietary fatty acid intakes but positive associations with CRC of borderline significance were seen for both dietary and PPL linoleic acid. Positive associations with dietary palmitic acid (16:0), MUFAs and n‐6 PUFAs were seen for rectal but not colon cancers. PPL 22:6 n‐3 was inversely associated with rectal cancer. Limiting intakes of SFAs and MUFAs could be assisted by following existing guidelines to limit red and processed meats which are important sources in the Australian diet. Our observations regarding linoleic acid should be examined further.     

The role of nutrition in the etiology of cancer of the large intestine

The epidemiologic case-control study included 100 patients with histologically verified colorectal cancer. The groups of cancer patients and controls with non-tumor pathology treated at a therapeutic department of a city clinical hospital were identical with respect to age and sex. A questionnaire was used to study average intake of foods within 12 months prior to disease. Consumption of basic dietary ingredients was calculated. The logistic regression method was employed to assess the relative risk of colonic cancer development for four levels of consumption of each ingredient. The tendency of risk variation was evaluated. The increase in the risk of colonic cancer was accounted for by the high consumption of monounsaturated fatty acids (p = 0.023), starch (p = 0.05) and a rise in meat/vegetables (p less than 0.001), protein/cellulose (p less than 0.001) and fat/cellulose (p = 0.023) ratios. High intake of beta-carotene (p = 0.011), vitamin C (p = 0.003), calcium (p = 0.009) and dairy products (p = 0.003) and increased poly/mono-unsaturated fatty acid ratio (p = 0.014) were associated with low relative risk.     

Dietary total fat and fatty acids intake,serum fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: A meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies

Results from prospective cohort studies on the association between dietary total fat and fatty acids intake and risk of breast cancer remain controversial. Pertinent prospective cohort studies were identified by a search of Embase and PubMed from inception to September 2015. Study‐specific relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a random‐effect model. Between‐study heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and sensitivity analysis was conducted. Twenty‐four independent studies on dietary total fat and fatty acids intake and seven studies on serum fatty acids were included. The pooled RR of breast cancer for the highest vs. lowest category of dietary total fat intake was 1.10 (1.02–1.19); however, no association was observed in studies adjusting for traditional risk factors of breast cancer. No association was observed between animal fat, vegetable fat, saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), n‐3 PUFA, n‐6 PUFA, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, alpha‐linolenic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid and arachidonic acid and risk of breast cancer. The pooled RRs of breast cancer for the highest vs. lowest category of serum SFA, MUFA, PUFA, n‐3 PUFA and n‐6 PUFA were 1.00 (0.78–1.28), 1.41 (0.99–2.03), 0.59 (0.27–1.30), 0.81 (0.60–1.10) and 0.84 (0.60–1.18), respectively. Results from this meta‐analysis suggested that dietary total fat and fatty acids might be not associated with risk of breast cancer.     

Attributable risks for colorectal cancer in Northern Italy

Using data from a case-control study conducted between 1985 and 1992 in northern Italy on 828 cases of colon cancer, 498 cases of rectal cancer and 2,024 controls in hospital for acute, non-neoplastic, non-digestive tract disorders, we estimated the percent population attributable risk (PAR) for colorectal cancer in relation to β-carotene, vitamin C (as markers of a diet rich in fruit and vegetables), red meat and seasoning fat intake, daily meal frequency and family history of the disease. On the basis of multivariate odds ratios, adjusted for total calorie intake, a low intake of β-carotene accounted for 39% of all the cases and a low intake of vitamin C for 14%. These two micronutrients together explained 43% of all colorectal cancer cases in this population. A high frequency of intake of red meat consumption explained 17% of all cases, and a high score of seasoning fats 4%. A higher daily meal frequency was responsable for 13% of the cases, and these 5 dietary factors together explained 63% of colorectal cancer cases in this population. Family history of colorectal cancer accounted for 4% of all cases. These estimates were similar for colon and rectal cancers separately, in males and females, and in younger and elderly subjects, except for seasoning fats and family history, whose PARs were apparently greater for colon cancer and at younger age. Thus, even though available dietary data were limited in several aspects, and the PAR estimates were based on somewhat arbitrary assumptions regarding the exposure distribution, about two-thirds of all colorectal cancers in this population could be explained in terms of a few risk factors or risk indicators considered. This would correspond to the avoidance of a large proportion of the over 18,000 deaths from colorectal cancer registered per year in the whole of Italy. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.