12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients

The proliferation signal inhibitor everolimus (Certican), has demonstrated efficacy with full-dose cyclosporine (CsA) (Neoral). Two multicenter randomized controlled studies were performed to compare 12-month efficacy and safety of everolimus 1.5 and 3.0 mg/day with reduced-dose CsA. Study 1 enrolled 237 de novo renal allograft recipients, randomizing 222 nonblack patients to either everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day, with the Neoral) dose guided by C(2) (monitoring of CsA concentration 2 h after dosing). Study 2 had a similar protocol, with basiliximab included, enrolling 256 recipients and randomizing 243 nonblack patients. In Study 1, there was a lower incidence of acute rejection in nonblack patients on 3 mg/day (16.4%) compared with 1.5 mg/day (25.9%), P = 0.08. In Study 2, the inclusion of basiliximab lowered the overall incidence of acute rejection; 14.3% of nonblack patients (3 mg/day) and 13.6% of nonblack patients (1.5 mg/day) had acute rejection by 12 months (P =0.891). Renal function was preserved throughout the study, with no differences observed between groups within studies. Everolimus was well tolerated with no significant differences between doses. Everolimus, in combination with reduced-dose Neoral), demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated. Basiliximab allows for utilization of lower doses of everolimus with reduced dosing of Neoral).     

Letermovir in lung transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection: A retrospective observational study

Letermovir is a new antiviral drug approved for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic stem cell transplants. The aim of the study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of letermovir in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. All lung transplant recipients between March 2018 and August 2020, who have been treated with letermovir for ganciclovir-resistant or refractory CMV infection were included in the study and analysed retrospectively. In total, 28 patients were identified. CMV disease was present in 15 patients (53.6%). In 23 patients (82.1%), rapid response was noticed, and CMV-viral load could be significantly decreased (>1 log₁₀) after a median of 17 [14–27] days and cleared subsequently in all of these patients. Five patients (17.9%) were classified as non-responder. Thereof, development of a mutation of the CMV UL56 terminase (UL-56-Gen: C325Y) conferring letermovir resistance could be observed in three patients (60%). Common side effects were mild and mostly of gastrointestinal nature. Mild adjustments of the immunosuppressive drugs were mandatory upon treatment initiation with letermovir. In addition to other interventions, letermovir was effective in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. However, in patients with treatment failure mutation conferring letermovir, resistance should be taken into account.     

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of everolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients: 12- and 36-month results.

Everolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressive agent with known consistent absorption. In this double-blind study, we examined the safety and tolerability of everolimus vs. placebo in de novo liver transplant recipients. One hundred and nineteen liver allograft recipients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: everolimus 0.5 mg bid, everolimus 1.0 mg bid, everolimus 2 mg bid, or placebo. Patients received oral cyclosporine to achieve a target trough level of 150-400 ng/mL in combination with prednisone. Primary and secondary endpoints of safety, tolerability, and efficacy were determined at 12 months, and patients were followed through 36 months. There was a trend toward fewer treated acute rejections in the everolimus group than in the placebo group: everolimus 0.5 mg: 39.3%; everolimus 1.0 mg: 30.0%; everolimus 2 mg: 29.0%; placebo: 40.0% (P = not significant). Adverse events were higher in everolimus-treated patients especially at the 4-mg/day dose, but there was no difference in the incidence of thrombocytopenia or leukopenia between all groups and renal function as determined by serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance remained stable to 36 months in everolimus-treated patients. Mean cholesterol and triglycerides increased from baseline in all treatment groups, and maximum levels were seen at 6 months. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that everolimus in combination with oral cyclosporine had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, paving the way for additional studies in this transplant indication.     

Conversion from sirolimus to everolimus in maintenance renal transplant recipients within a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen: results of a 6-month pilot study

AIM: To provide data on conversion of kidney transplant patients from sirolimus to everolimus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 6-month prospective, open-label pilot study, maintenance renal transplant patients receiving sirolimus, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids without concomitant calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy were converted to everolimus 8 mg/day (8 - 15 ng/ml), and followed for 6 months. Mycophenolic acid and corticosteroid therapy were continued unchanged. Patients with acute rejection within the previous 3 months were excluded. RESULTS: 11 patients were recruited and completed the study (mean 5.1 +/- 1.8 years post transplant). Mean everolimus trough level remained within target throughout the study. Mean GFR remained stable (Day 0, 48.4 +/- 8.4 ml/min/1.73 m2, Month 6, 49.5 +/- 17.3 ml/ min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.966), as did mean renal phosphate threshold (TmPO4/GFR) (Day 0, 0.41 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, Month 6, 0.40 +/- 0.17 mmol/l (p = 0.966)). Serum phosphates increased significantly from 0.71 to 0.77 mmol/l (p = 0.01), but tubular reabsorption of phosphates and 24-h phosphaturia remained unchanged and mean PTH concentration tended to decrease. No patient died, lost their graft or experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection after conversion. There were no cases of CMV infection. Tolerability remained similar post conversion. Hematological and lipid parameters remained stable. Liver enzymes and sex hormones remained within normal ranges. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that converting kidney transplant patients receiving CNI-free maintenance immunosuppression from sirolimus to everolimus, at relatively high exposure levels, is safe and easily manageable. There was no consistent evidence for a change in GFR or proximal tubular function.     

COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter study

This study describes the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). This is a multicenter, retrospective study of all adult LTRs with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 4 until April 28, 2020 in six Spanish reference hospitals for lung transplantation. Clinical and radiological data, treatment characteristics, and outcomes were reviewed. Forty-four cases were identified in that period. The median time from transplantation was 4.2 (interquartile range: 1.11–7.3) years. Chest radiography showed acute parenchymal abnormalities in 32 (73%) cases. Hydroxychloroquine was prescribed in 41 (93%), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in 14 (32%), and tocilizumab in 19 (43%) patients. There was a strong interaction between tacrolimus and LPV/r in all cases. Thirty-seven (84%) patients required some degree of respiratory support and/or oxygen therapy, and 13 (30%) were admitted to intermediate or intensive critical care units. Seventeen (39%) patients had died and 20 (45%) had been discharged at the time of the last follow-up. Deceased patients had a worse respiratory status and chest X-ray on admission and presented with higher D-dimer, interleukin-6, and lactate dehydrogenase levels. In this multicenter LTR cohort, SARS-CoV-2 presented with high mortality. Additionally, the severity of disease on presentation predicted subsequent mortality.     

A lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in de novo heart transplant recipients randomized to everolimus

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in recipients of cardiac transplants is associated with higher rates of morbidity. A recent phase III trial showed highly significantly (P<0.001) lower CMV rates with the proliferation signal inhibitor everolimus compared to azathioprine (AZA). To better define this association, data on CMV risk factors were collected retrospectively and analyzed. METHODS: Data on CMV risk factors from a multicenter phase III trial on de novo heart transplant recipients (n=634) receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg/day (group 1), everolimus 3 mg/day (group 2), or AZA (group 3) were merged with prospectively collected CMV-related outcome data and analyzed. RESULTS: CMV-positive donors (D+) and CMV-negative recipients (R-) were evenly distributed across groups 1-3 at 36/209 (17.2%), 48/211 (22.7%), and 38/214 (17.8%), respectively. CMV prophylaxis had been given for a mean (SD) of 175 (127.8), 183 (137.1), and 177 (132.9) days, respectively. In the high-risk D+/R- subgroup with prophylaxis, the proportions of patients with CMV infection compared with group 3 (12/29 [41.4%]) were 3/25 (12.0%) in group 1 (P=0.031) and 6/36 (16.7%) in group 2 (P=0.049). In D+/R+ subgroups either with or without prophylaxis, the everolimus groups had less CMV disease (P<0.001). The incidence of CMV syndrome, organ involvement, and laboratory evidence was lower with everolimus use compared to AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus is associated with lower rates of CMV infection, syndrome, or organ involvement, suggesting an additional advantage from the use of everolimus in cardiac transplant recipients.     

Efficacy and safety of conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus in living‐donor kidney transplant recipients: an analysis from the ZEUS study

Conversion of living‐donor kidney transplant patients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to an mTOR inhibitor is poorly documented. In the prospective, multicentre ZEUS study, 300 kidney transplant recipients without prior rejection (Banff grade >1) and serum creatinine ≤265 μmol/l were randomized to continue cyclosporine or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months post‐transplant. In a post hoc analysis of 80 living‐donor recipients, adjusted estimated GFR (Nankivell) at month 12 (the primary endpoint) was 74.3 (95% CI [70.7, 77.9]) ml/min/1.73 m² with everolimus versus 63.8 (95% CI [60.0, 67.7]) ml/min/1.73 m²) with cyclosporine, a difference of 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m² in favour of everolimus (P < 0.001). From randomization to month 12, adjusted estimated GFR increased by a mean of 9.8 (95% CI [6.2, 13.4]) ml/min/1.73 m² with everolimus versus ?0.7 (95% CI [?4.6, 3.1]) ml/min/1.73 m²) (P < 0.001) with cyclosporine. There were six biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes in everolimus‐treated patients (five Banff grade I) and one episode in cyclosporine‐treated patients (Banff grade 1). Overall safety profile was similar between groups. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in three everolimus patients (7.1%) and five cyclosporine patients (13.2%) between randomization and month 12. Initiation of everolimus with early elimination of calcineurin therapy is associated with a significant renal benefit at 12 months post‐transplant that is observed in both living and deceased‐donor recipients. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00154310)     

Neoral-to-Gengraf conversion in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and need for dosage adjustments when patients taking the Neoral formulation of cyclosporine are converted to the generic formulation, Gengraf. METHODS: From September 2001 through January 2002, patients receiving follow-up care in the renal transplant clinic at the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System were converted from Neoral to Gengraf based on a 1:1 dosing equivalency. Steady-state cyclosporine trough concentrations were obtained both prior to and following Neoral-to-Gengraf conversions. Patients were also monitored for changes in serum creatinine, hospitalization, cyclosporine toxicity, graft rejection, and need for further adjustment in cyclosporine regimen. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included in data analysis. There were no differences in cyclosporine concentrations (P =.0853) or serum creatinine (P =.4469) following conversion to Gengraf. There were no reports of cyclosporine toxicity, no episodes of graft rejection, and no need for further dose adjustment related to the generic conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Neoral and Gengraf are therapeutically equivalent cyclosporine formulations, such that renal transplant recipients maintained on Neoral can be safely and effectively converted to the Gengraf formulation based on a 1:1 conversion ratio. The use of Gengraf over Neoral within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System offers a reduced cost alternative but maintains equal efficacy and outcomes.     

Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the conversion of cyclosporine to tacrolimus in heart and lung transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to tacrolimus (TRL) remains challenging in the daily routine due to individual variations in blood concentrations (pharmacokinetics, PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and in interactions on plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations. Therefore, we used our PD assays of lymphocyte function to monitor the conversion of CsA to TRL in heart (HTx) and lung (LTx) transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients (six HTx, two LTx) were converted from CsA to TRL because of gingival hyperplasia. All patients were treated with 6 mg BID TRL 24 hours after the last CsA dose and received mycophenolate mofetil BID cotherapy. PK measurements of CsA, TRL, and MPA were done by EMIT. Expression of cytokine production (IL-2, TNF-alpha), lymphocyte proliferation (PCNA), and activation (CD25) was assessed by FACS. RESULTS: TRL concentrations increased from day 1 to 3, but did not alter MPA concentrations, which were comparably high to MPA concentrations in combination with CsA (day 0). Compared to CsA therapy, increased TRL concentrations did not further inhibit PCNA expression, inhibited CD25 expression less on days 1 and 2 and equally high on day 3, but inhibited expression of IL-2 and TNF-alpha significantly higher on days 2 and 3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that monitoring PD of lymphocyte functions after conversion from CsA to TRL in HTx and LTx recipients revealed differences of inhibition of lymphocyte functions. Monitoring PD of lymphocyte function may provide insights in drug interactions of immunosuppressive combination therapy and may help to tailor immunosuppression to avoid toxicity and to enhance efficacy.     

Long-term use of everolimus in lung transplant patients

Everolimus has been successfully used in solid organ transplantation, especially of the heart and kidney, but much less often in lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of everolimus in lung transplantation in Chile. We retrospectively analyzed patients receiving everolimus between 2005 and 2010 in terms of indication, lung and kidney function, rejection episodes, infections, malignancy appearance, and adverse events. Ten of 60 lung transplant recipients were converted to everolimus (16%) at some point after transplantation: four due to calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy (RD); four bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS); one lymphoma; and one, graft pulmonary fibrosis. Among patients with RD, at a mean follow-up of 25 months (range = 3-60), renal function remained stable with baseline of 42.7 mL/min and final creatinine clearance of 45.7 mL/min; lung function did not deteriorate. BOS patients, with an average of 30 months' follow-up (range = 12-48), showed baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second of 49% (r: 41-57) without variation in three patients, but with a decrease in another one after 12 months. One patient discontinued everolimus due to intolerance after 1 year. Two patients developed neoplasias: skin cancer and multiple myeloma. There were 14 infection episodes in seven patients, including 10 involving the respiratory tract infections. Only one patient developed dyslipidemia after everolimus initiation. Two patients died: one due to multiple myeloma and another to BOS. There was no rejection episode. Everolimus was effective and safe when used in combination with low doses of calcineurin inhibitor over long-term follow-up of lung transplant patients.     

Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

Sirolimus (SRL) is a new, potent immunosuppressive agent. More recently, proteinuria has been reported as a consequence of sirolimus therapy, although the mechanism has remained unclear. We retrospectively examined the records of 25 renal transplant patients, who developed or displayed increased proteinuria after SRL conversion. The patient cohort (14 men, 11 women) was treated with SRL as conversion therapy, due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) (n = 15) neoplasia (n = 8); Kaposi's sarcoma, Four skin cancers, One intestinal tumors, One renal cell carsinom) or BK virus nephropathy (n = 2). SRL was started at a mean of 78 +/- 42 (15 to 163) months after transplantation. Mean follow-up on SRL therapy was 20 +/- 12 (6 to 43) months. Proteinuria increased from 0.445 (0 to 1.5) g/d before conversion to 3.2 g/dL (0.2 to 12) after conversion (P = 0.001). Before conversion 8 (32%) patients had no proteinuria, whereas afterwards all patients had proteinuria. In 28% of patients proteinuria remained unchanged, whereas it increased in 68% of patients. In 40% it increased by more than 100%. Twenty-eight percent of patients showed increased proteinuria to the nephrotic range. Biopsies performed in five patients revealed new pathological changes: One membranoproliferative glomerulopathy and interstitial nephritis. These patients showed persistently good graft function. Serum creatinine values did not change significantly: 1.98 +/- 0.8 mg/dL before SRL therapy and 2.53 +/- 1.9 mg/dL at last follow-up (P = .14). Five grafts were lost and the patients returned to dialysis. Five patients displayed CAN and Kaposi's sarcoma. Mean urinary protein of patients who returned to dialysis was 1.26 (0.5 to 3.5) g/d before and 4.7 (3 to 12) g/d after conversion (P = .01). Mean serum creatinine level before conversion was 2.21 mg/dL and thereafter, 4.93 mg/dL (P = .02). Heavy proteinuria was common after the use of SRL as rescue therapy for renal transplantation. Therefore, conversion should be considered for patients who have not developed advanced CAN and proteinuria. The possibility of de novo glomerular pathology under SRL treatment requires further investigation by renal biopsy.     

A retrospective flow cytometric crossmatch study in transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies

Abstract Our previous data shows renal transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies to have a reduced transplant survival when compared to patients without autoantibodies. This could have been due to the presence of weak IgG antibodies inhibited by the dithiothreitol used to remove IgM antibodies in the pretransplant cytotoxicity cross-match. That possibility was investigated in a retrospective study of 52 recipients of 57 renal transplants who were recrossmatched using a more sensitive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) to detect recipient IgG antibodies to donor T and/or B cell splenic lymphocytes. Fourteen of the 57 (24%) transplants failed. Six losses were within the 1st month posttransplant and four of these were immunological failures. None of the transplant failures had a positive pretransplant FCXM. These results showed that the recipients with autoantibodies did not have pretransplant IgG anti-donor antibodies. The transplant failures did not, therefore, relate to the presence of antibodies undetected by the dithiothreitol-treated cytotoxicity crossmatch.     

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a safe and simple procedure

To date there is a substantial experience with rapamycin conversion in stable renal transplant recipients with respect to the procedure of conversion, initial doses, and target blood levels as well as adverse events, but in the case of Everolimus there is almost no experience with conversion and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal. We describe an initial experience among 32 renal transplant recipients who were converted to Everolimus with complete suspension of CNI in two Spanish transplant centers. Our results emphasised the procedure for conversion, the target levels, the adverse events, and the initial efficacy, over the first month after conversion. Our conclusions were that conversion from CNI to Everolimus was a simple, safe procedure with a predictable profile of adverse events, which were, in general, of mild intensity. There was a good correlation between initial dose and blood level. Initial doses of about 3 mg/d combined with rapid reduction in CNI exposure seemed to be adequate. The target range levels between 5 and 10 ng/mL seemed to be sufficient for complete CNI elimination, especially in patients also receiving antiproliferative drugs (such as mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) in whom levels near the lower end of the range might be adequate.     

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients with malignant neoplasia

Cancer has been reported to be more common among kidney transplant recipients than waiting-list patients or the general population. Use of anticalcineurin agents and azathioprine are relevant risk factors. Nine renal allograft recipients (seven men and two women) of mean age 67.6 (55-77) years and mean time after transplantation of 30.7 (58-216) months were switched to everolimus-based immunosuppression because of the presence of biopsy-proven malignancies (eight patients) or neurological tacrolimus toxicity (one patient). One patient with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease also received chemotherapy with a good evolution at 6 months. He showed an initial increase in the protein to creatinine ratio (peak 3.3 mg/mg at 3 months) that was controlled by increasing the enalapril dose. One patient with skin cancer and severe atheromatosis (baseline SCr 2.5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 17 mL/min, and protein to creatinine ratio 3.2 mg/mg), had cyclosporine and everolimus overlapped for 25 days, showing a continued poor evolution requiring dialysis initiation at 3 months after switch. The other six patients with recurrent skin cancers had good cancer evolution, with no new skin tumors and regression of skin lesions in three, including not biopsied actinic keratosis. Sudden switching from calcineurin inhibitors to everolimus is safe and may be used in long-term transplant recipients with malignancies. In patients with advanced chronic nephropathy this approach appeared to be less beneficial.     

Conversion from sirolimus to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving a calcineurin-free regimen

Carvalho C, Coentrão L, Bustorff M, Patrício E, Sampaio S, Santos J, Oliveira G, Pestana M. Conversion from sirolimus to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving a calcineurin‐free regimen.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E401–E405. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus (SRL) were introduced into immunosuppressive regimens, in an attempt to replace or reduce the dose of the nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). In our institution, due to an administrative decision, conversion from SRL to EVL, was carried out, providing us the opportunity to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of both drugs and to review the practical conversion dose between them. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 51 maintenance kidney transplant recipients receiving an SRL‐based CNI‐free regimen, who were switched to EVL. SRL dose was concentration controlled to a through level of 4–8 ng/mL. Patients were converted to a variable dose of EVL that was adjusted to achieve a trough concentration of 3–8 ng/mL. Results: SRL mean dose at time of conversion was 2.0 ± 0.9 mg/d. Initial EVL mean dose was 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/d. Six months after conversion, mean EVL trough level was 6.2 ± 2.8 ng/mL. EVL dose at this point was 2.0 ± 0.9 mg/d, which was not statistically different from SRL dose at the time of conversion (p = 0.575), suggesting a conversion factor of 1:1. During this six month period post conversion, no significant changes were observed in serum creatinine, hematocrit level, platelet count, proteinuria or lipid levels. No patient experienced an acute rejection episode. Conclusions: Conversion from SRL to EVL in renal transplant recipients receiving a CNI‐free immunosuppressive regimen can be performed safely with a low trough level range of EVL. We report for the first time a conversion factor between SRL and EVL.     

Conversion therapy to everolimus in renal transplant recipients: results after one year

BACKGROUND: Two new diagnoses have been causing graft loss during long-term follow-up, namely, chronic nephropathy and anticalcineurinic toxicity. The advent of the mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) obviates anticalcineurine toxicity and reduces posttransplant malignancy incidence with good inmunosuppressive potential. We examinated the renal and metabolic behavior in renal transplant recipients who required conversion from an anticalcineurinic (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) to an m-TOR inhibitor (everolimus) as part of their immunosuppressive maintenance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one first renal transplant recipients had everolimus added to their inmunosuppressive therapy combined with an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or sodium mycophenolate). The mean age of the patients was 35 +/- 17 years (range, 6 to 65). The prevalence of male recipients was 57%; the overall mean weight, 64 kg (range, 48 to 95). All patients were hispanic with 15 transplants from cadaveric donors (71%). The mean follow-up posttransplant was 18 months (range, 3 to 40) and the mean follow-up on everolimus, 10 months (range, 2 to 22). RESULTS: There was no mortality or graft loss, but there were 3 (17%) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes. There were no significant changes in metabolic function pre- or postconversion. Regarding renal function, the mean creatinine serum showed a trend to decline: preconversion 1.7 mg/dL; postconversion 1.5 mg/dL. In 10 patients, it was possible to discontinue at least one antihypertensive medication (48%). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was an effective medication to manage renal transplant patients. It produced metabolic stability and low myelotoxicity, despite combination with an antimetabolite (mycophenolic acid). Also, reduction of antihypertensive medications was an additional benefits for many patients.     

Pregnancy in lung transplant recipients

Eight female lung transplant recipients, all of whom became pregnant after transplant, were reported to the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry from US transplant centers. Outcomes of the 8 pregnancies were 4 live births, 3 therapeutic abortions, and 1 spontaneous abortion. Three of the 4 newborns were premature, with low birth weight (< 2500 grams). Rejection during pregnancy occurred in 3 pregnancies (38%). All 8 transplant recipients reported at least 1 complication during pregnancy, including shortness of breath, rejection, and infection. Two of the 4 deliveries were by cesarean section. At follow-up, all children were developing well with no residual problems. Female lung transplant recipients may face higher risks during pregnancy than other solid organ transplant recipients.