老年人股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗

股骨转子间骨折是老年人常见骨折之一。近年来随着社会老龄化 ,人均寿命的延长 ,老年人股骨转子间骨折的发病率呈上升趋势。过去对股骨转子间骨折多采用保守治疗 ,如牵引等 ,效果欠佳 ,卧床时间长 ,并发症多 ,死亡率高 ,随着内固定物与治疗方法的不断改进 ,目前主张早期手术治疗[1] 。自 1995年 2月～ 2 0 0 2年 2月我院手术治疗 6 0岁以上老年人股骨转子间骨折 6 0例 ,效果良好 ,现总结如下 :1　临床资料1 1　一般资料　本组 6 0例 ,男 2 5例 ,女 35例 ,年龄 6 0～ 6 9岁 2 1例 ,70～ 79岁 34例 ,80～ 89岁 5例 ,年龄最大 89岁 ,平均 75岁…     

老年人股骨转子间骨折手术治疗研究进展

股骨转子间不稳定型骨折是临床老年人常见的疾病,约占髋部骨折的31%~51%[1]。随着人口的老龄化其发病率呈逐年上升趋势。由于股骨转子部血运丰富,骨折后极少发生不愈合、股骨头坏死等并发症,但是不稳定型骨折     

老年人股骨转子间骨折的围手术处理

目的:探讨高龄股骨转子间骨折的围手术期准备的方式。方法:本组45例高龄股骨转子间骨折,33例合并有内科疾病。术前及时诊断并治疗内科疾病,选择恰当的麻醉及手术方式,术后继续治疗,预防并发症。结果:38例经围手术期处理,顺利进行手术,7例因围手术期并发症采取保守治疗。围手术期并发症发生率为34.2%。结论:老年患者多合并内科疾病,手术风险大,只有充分做好术前准备,控制内科并发症,才能降低手术的风险,取得满意的疗效。     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

目的比较老年股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效。方法对85例老年股骨转子间骨折分别采用动力髋螺钉（DHS）45例,Gamma钉40例进行手术治疗,比较2组疗效和并发症发生率。结果85例老年股骨转子间骨折经治疗后优良率为83．5％;DHS及Gamma钉治疗股骨转子问骨折的优良率分别为77．8％和90．0％（0=2．84,P〉0．05）;DHS组的手术时（66．4±19．4）min少于Gamma钉组（875±25．5）min（t=2．451,P〈0．05）,但手术切口长度（19．6±5．1）cm大于Gamma钉组（10．3±4．7）cm（t=2．501,P〈0．05）,DHS组并发症11．1％明显高于Gamma钉组2．5％（X2=3．94,P〈0．05）。结论股骨转子间骨折患者只要身体状况能耐受手术者推荐其使用DHS和Gamma钉手术方法。     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

老年人股骨转子间骨折两种手术方法疗效的比较

Objective To compare the curative effects of intertrochantefie fractures in aged by two operative methods. Methods 85 cases of elderly patients suffered from intertrechanteric fractures were retrospectively ana-lyzed. Out of the 85 cases,45 cases were treated with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and 40 cases were fixed with Gamma nails. The curative effects and complications were compared simultaneously. Results The total excellent rate was 83.5% in 85 patients,the rates of DHS and Gamma nails group were 77. 8% and 90% (X2 = 2. 84, P 0. 05), re-spectively. The operative time (66. 4 ± 19. 4)min in DHS group were less than the Gamma nail group (875 ± 25.5) rain (t=2. 451 ,P < 0. 05), but the length of surgical incision (19. 6± 5. 1)cm greater than the Gamma nail group (10. 3 ± 4. 7) cm(t = 2. 501, P < 0. 05). The complications of DHS group (11.1%) were significanfly higher than that of Gamma nail group(2. 5%) (X2 =3.94,P<0. 05). Conclusion As long as the physical condition can toler-ate,surgery recommend the use of DHS and Gamma nail surgical techniques in aged patients with intertrechanteric fractures.     

股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗研究进展

转子间骨折是髋关节囊外骨折,在中老年人的髋部骨折中比较常见,多项流行病学研究显示转子间骨折的发生率逐渐增加[1].老年人的转子间骨折多与骨质疏松有关,在跌倒后容易发生该部位骨折[2].老年人髋部转子间骨折有20％～30％的并发症和17％的死亡率.为了尽早复位及功能锻炼、减少并发症,目前多主张手术治疗[3].对股骨转子间骨折的外科治疗研究一直在进行中,骨科医生需要面对的股骨转子间骨折的患者越来越多,手术治疗方法不断进展,因此了解股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗,对临床工作有积极意义,本文对此进行综述如下.     

股骨转子间骨折手术方法的选择

目的探讨股骨转子间骨折的特点及合适的手术方法。方法股骨转子间骨折85例,动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定55例,锁定加压钢板固定9例,人工股骨头置换21例。结果经术后2个月至3年随访,DHS内固定组4例出现轻度髋内翻畸形;锁定钢板组1例轻度髋内翻畸形。按黄公怡关节功能评价标准评价,优48例,良29例,可7例,差1例。优良率90.1%。结论治疗股骨转子间骨折,应根据患者的全身情况,骨折类型,选择合适的手术方法。     

股骨转子间骨折的手术及固定

目的探究动力髋螺钉内固定术(DHS)治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效,为临床治疗股骨转子间骨折提供新思路。方法对2006年10月～2010年10月我院接收的78例股骨转子间骨折患者施行DHS术治疗,骨折按Tronzo和Evans的分类方法,观察记录患者骨折类型均获愈合情况,有无坏死和感染等并发症。结果所有78例股骨转子间骨折患者骨折全部愈合,平均愈合时间为15周,随访无感染、脂肪栓塞、深静脉血栓、骨折不愈合、髋内翻及旋转畸形等并发症发生。结论 DHS术治疗股骨转子间骨折具有操作简单、创伤小、符合生物学固定原则、骨折固定牢固、并发症少及患者可早期离床负重等优点,值得在临床推广使用。     

老年股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗

目的观察采用动力加压髋螺钉（DHS）内固定治疗老年转子间骨折临床疗效。方法选取22例老年股骨转子间骨折患者采用切开复位DHS手术治疗,对结果进行回顾分析。结果术后平均随访8月（4～12月）,21例骨折复位、固定、愈合均满意,髋关节活动良好,1例患者因骨折粉碎严重出现髋关节活动受限。结论采用动力加压髋螺钉（DHS）内固定治疗老年转子间骨折固定可靠,结合术后功能锻炼,疗效良好。