Identification of the antibody to vascular endothelial cells in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation

Acute cardiac dysfunction occurred in four cardiac allograft recipients with negative donor-specific lymphocyte crossmatches. In two recipients the transplanted heart was removed and the patients were maintained on bypass for several hours until a second cardiac allograft was available. In these patients the second transplanted heart also underwent acute dysfunction. The lymphocyte crossmatch was again negative in both second transplants. Two of the four recipients had no detectable antibody to a panel of lymphocytes. Examination of the hearts demonstrated histologic findings consistent with hyperacute rejection. Direct immunofluorescence performed on the transplanted hearts revealed the presence of immunoglobulin and complement deposited on the vascular endothelium. Pathology data was available on 3 of the 4 patients who experienced acute cardiac dysfunction. Pretransplant sera from these four recipients were screened for the presence of antivascular endothelial cell (VEC) antibody. The sera from all four recipients were found to contain antibody against an endothelial cell panel. In addition, donor-specific aorta and vena cava were available from one of the heart donors. The recipient was found to have donor-specific antibody to VEC. Thus, antibody directed against VEC specific antigens appears to be related to hyperacute rejection of heart allografts.     

The vascular endothelial cell antigen system

Vascular endothelial cells (VEC) are clearly immunogenic and express antigens unique to vascular endothelial cells. The observation that peripheral blood monocytes also express this VEC antigen system made prospective testing feasible. Preformed antibody to the VEC/monocyte antigen system of the donor usually leads to graft rejection in HLA-identical combinations, but antibody directed against donor monocytes exclusively (monocyte-specific antigens) appears to be benign. Clearly the VEC antigen system is an important immunogen in HLA-identical living-related donor combinations--and, in addition, this antigen system may be equally important in the non-HLA-identical combinations. The identification of antibody directed against the VEC/monocyte antigens of the donor is frequently masked by the concurrent development of anti-HLA antibody. Preliminary family segregation studies support the concept of genetic linkage between the VEC/monocyte antigen system and the major histocompatibility complex. A group of 153 consecutive, prospective monocyte crossmatches performed have yielded approximately a 7% incidence of positive monocyte crossmatches, with traditional crossmatches being negative. This frequency of patients sensitized to the VEC/monocyte antigens of the donor could conceivably account for up to 70% of the observed early graft loss in living-related donors. We think a positive monocyte crossmatch to the donor in the presence of positive reactivity to concordant VEC and monocytes remains a contraindication to transplantation.     

Chronic renal allograft rejection: the significance of non-MHC alloantigens

We studied the role of polymorphic endothelial antigens other than MHC in antibody-mediated chronic renal allograft rejection in two models. In the first model, donor Lewis rat kidneys were transplanted into BN recipients that had been made tolerant for donor class I antigens at the B cell (antibody) level. In this setting Lewis kidney grafts were chronically rejected with stable renal function but increasing proteinuria (> 100 mg/24 h). Rejected graft tissue showed mononuclear cell infiltration and the presence of glomerular vasculonecrotic lesions with fibrinoid material, associated with IgG and IgM deposition, but with absent or weak C3 binding. Graft endothelium showed no expression of MHC class II antigens. Serum antibodies were not reactive with donor class I antigens, but did react with endothelial non-MHC alloantigens. In the second model, more direct information on the role of endothelial non-MHC alloantigens in renal allograft rejection was obtained by transplanting Lewis 1 N kidneys into unmodified BN recipients (MHC-matched transplants). Here, similar to the first model, the animals developed severe proteinuria with stable renal function. Histopathological examination showed mononuclear cell infiltration and deposition of IgM and IgG along the glomerular vasculature, but this time in the presence of strong C3 reactivity. However, glomerular vasculonecrotic lesions with intense fibrin deposition were not observed. The data showed that although clinically the two kidney transplantation models used gave similar chronic rejection phenomena, histopathologically some striking differences were observed in the glomeruli. The precise mechanisms effecting chronic rejection of the grafts is still a puzzle. However, immune reactivity against graft (endothelial) non-MHC antigens may play a significant role.     

The significance of a donor-specific vessel crossmatch in renal transplantation

Very early graft rejection is usually attributed to pretransplant sensitization to HLA antigens represented on the lymphocyte. However, it is possible that such rejection episodes are secondary to antibody to a transplant-relevant system that is not represented on the lymphocyte but is represented within the allograft. This study suggests that sensitization to antigens on the VEC is detrimental to allograft success and can occur in the absence of sensitization to HLA antigens on the T or B cell or monocyte. When antibody to donor VEC is not present pretransplant, almost all patients (95%) will have a very benign posttransplant clinical course. When anti VEC antibody is present, early graft rejection or severe rejection episodes occur with a very high frequency (80%) in the nondiabetic patient. These observations, therefore, suggest that the pretransplant presence of antibody to VEC is detrimental to graft survival, and that such antibody can develop in the absence of anti HLA antibody. While the presence of such antibody is not an absolute contraindication to transplantation it does appear to represent a significant risk factor for immunological graft loss.     

Successful living donor renal transplantation despite ABO incompatibility and a positive crossmatch

Potential live kidney donors have been rejected when the prospective recipients are blood type or crossmatch incompatible. By utilizing plasmapheresis combined with intravenous immune globulin (PP/IVIg) prior to surgery, donor-specific antibodies against blood group or human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been removed, thereby allowing successful renal transplantation. A 26-yr-old male with a panel reactive antibody level of 100% and repeated positive crossmatches against deceased donor kidney offers, including zero HLA mismatched donors, successfully underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation from his HLA-identical but nevertheless crossmatch-incompatible sister. The initial anti-A blood group isoagglutinin titers were 128, 256, and 1024 at room temperature, 37 degrees C, and 37 degrees C anti-IgG enhanced, respectively. With an individualized PP/IVIg regimen based on donor-specific antibody titer, however, the relevant antibodies were adequately reduced and hyperacute rejection avoided. Subsequent antibody-mediated rejection, likely directed against a minor histocompatibility antigen, was diagnosed on postoperative day 7 and successfully treated. Neither ABO, or crossmatch incompatibility, or both in combination prohibit kidney transplantation.     

The contribution of adhesion molecule expression in donor kidney biopsies to early allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft rejection is associated with the expression of adhesion molecules on vascular endothelial and tubular epithelial cells. METHODS: To assess whether the number of cell adhesion molecules expressed in donor kidneys can predict early rejection or delayed graft function, kidney biopsies from 20 living and 53 cadaveric kidney donors were obtained before engraftment into the recipients and the expression of the cell adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule (E-selectin) were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All biopsies from living donors showed significantly lower expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 compared to biopsies from cadaveric donors. There was no difference in the expression of adhesion molecules on tubular cells between transplants with primary function compared to allografts with early rejection in living donated kidneys (ICAM-1: 2+/-8 vs. 3+/-8%; VCAM-1: 9+/-7 vs. 1+/-1%), as well as in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 38+/-29 vs. 39+/-38%; VCAM-1: 55+/-27 vs. 48+/-29%). The expression of ICAM-1 molecules on tubular cells was determined to be a predictor for the occurrence of delayed graft function in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 65+/-24* vs. 38+/-29% delayed graft versus primary graft function). No delayed graft function occurred in recipients of living donated kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that adhesion molecule expression in donor biopsies is not a predictor for early allograft rejection, but can be used as a marker for the development of postischemic acute renal allograft failure.     

Prolonged Survival of Renal Allografts in Outbred Rabbits Treated with Donor Specific F(ab')2 Alloantibody

Renal allograft survival was prolonged in rabbits, a species in which antibody mediated hyperacute rejection can occur, by administering large quantities of donor specific F(ab')(2) alloantibody. In 13 control animals, onset of uremia with histological evidence of rejection occurred at a mean of 6.0 days. Eight of eight rabbits actively immunized and seven of nine rabbits passively immunized with unmodified donor specific IgG alloantibody hyperacutely rejected an allografted kidney. Four rabbits treated with non-specific F(ab')(2) for one week acutely rejected an allografted kidney at a mean of 6.2 days. In 12 recipient rabbits receiving 100-500 mg of donor specific F(ab')(2) alloantibody for a mean of 8.5 days, onset of uremia was delayed to a mean of 14.5 days following transplantation. Recipients were selected so that the donor specific F(ab')(2) alloantibody employed had no activity against recipient antigens. This selection maximized the antigenic difference between the donor and recipient, and also assured us that the donor specific F(ab')(2) was directed against antigens present in the donor but absent in the recipient. Passive administration of donor specific F(ab')(2) allowed antibody mediated suppression of a specific immune response to occur without risk of hyperacute rejection. However, the onset of rejection could not be delayed indefinitely by this treatment. The experimental conditions employed and the difficulties encountered closely resemble those which will occur for clinical utilization of passive immunological enhancement.     

Antibodies directed against antigens on the endothelium of peritubular capillaries in patients with rejecting renal allografts.

This study was undertaken to examine the humoral immune response against endothelial antigens of the donor kidney in human renal allograft recipients. Sera from 61 transplant recipients who received 62 grafts were studied for the presence of circulating endothelial antibodies (CEAb) using an indirect immunofluorescence technique with a pretransplant biopsy of the graft as a substrate. IgG antibodies directed against the endothelium of peritubular capillaries were found in the sera of 6 of the 10 patients with graft rejection within 7 weeks after transplantation, whereas these antibodies were not found in the absence of rejection (P less than 0.001). Immunofluorescence studies of post-transplant biopsies showed IgG along the endothelium of peritubular capillaries only in the grafts of patients with CEAb. Eluates from these grafts contained IgG antibodies that bound to the endothelium of the donor as shown by the indirect immunofluorescence technique. Absorption of endothelial antibody (EAb)-positive sera with human platelets or Wistar strain rat erythrocytes showed that the EAb were not directed against serologically defined HLA antigens or against heterophile antigens on rat erythrocytes. We conclude from this study that the presence of antibodies directed against endothelial antigens is associated with poor graft prognosis and that these antibodies may be responsible for the rejection process.     

Both donor specific and non-donor specific HLA antibodies reduced in recipients post simultaneous liver/kidney transplant

It has been suggested that the liver allograft can protect the kidney allograft from antibody mediated rejection in simultaneous liver/kidney transplant (SLK) recipients by reducing preexisting donor specific antibodies (DSA) via adsorption of DSA by the liver allograft. Recently, the SLK allocation system was altered to provide a kidney safety net to those who do not recover native kidney function after liver transplant. However, the kidney transplant under the safety net creates a theoretical challenge for sensitized patients as the liver graft may not be able to adsorb human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies against the kidney under the safety net because the liver and kidney grafts are from different donors and may carry different HLA antigens. This prompts us to examine levels of non-donor specific HLA antibodies in SLK recipients in our hospital. We found that levels of both DSA and non-DSA decreased post SLK transplant. The presence of preexisting DSA was also not associated with kidney graft survival and antibody mediated rejection in SLK recipients. Our results indicate that the liver transplant can reduce non-DSA, which may increase the pool of compatible kidneys offered under the safety net program for sensitized patients.     

Class II Alloantibody and Mortality in Simultaneous Liver‐Kidney Transplantation

Hyperacute kidney rejection is unusual in crossmatch positive recipients of simultaneous liver–kidney transplants (SLKT). However, recent data suggest that these patients remain at risk for antibody‐mediated kidney rejection. To further investigate the risk associated with donor‐specific alloantibodies (DSA) in SLKT, we studied 86 consecutive SLKT patients with an available pre‐SLKT serum sample. Serum samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion for HLA DSA using single antigen beads (median florescence intensity ≥ 2,000 = positive). Post‐SLKT samples were analyzed when available (76%). Thirty patients had preformed DSA, and nine developed de novo DSA. Preformed class I DSA did not change the risk of rejection, patient or allograft survival. In contrast, preformed class II DSA was associated with a markedly increased risk of renal antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (p = 0.006), liver allograft rejection (p = 0.002), patient death (p = 0.02), liver allograft loss (p = 0.02) and renal allograft loss (p = 0.045). Multivariable modeling showed class II DSA (preformed or de novo) to be an independent predictor of patient death (HR = 2.2; p = 0.043) and liver allograft loss (HR = 2.2; p = 0.044). These data warrant reconsideration of the approach to DSA in SLKT.     

Progress in renal transplantation. A single center study of 3359 patients over 25 years.

OBJECTIVE: The study analyzed 3359 consecutive renal transplant operations for patient and graft survival, including living related, cadaveric, and living unrelated patients. The analysis was separated into three groups according to immunosuppression and date of transplant. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Improvements in renal transplantation in the past 25 years have been the result of better immunosuppression, organ preservation, and patient selection. METHODS: A single transplant center's experience over a 25-year period was analyzed regarding patient and graft survival. Potential risk factors included patient demographics, tissue typing, donor characteristics, number of transplants, acute and chronic rejection, acute tubular necrosis, primary disease, and malignancy. RESULTS: The primary cause of graft loss was rejection. Improvement in cadaveric graft survival since 1987 with quadruple therapy was not apparent in living donor patients. Race continued to be a negative factor in graft survival. Avoiding previous mismatched antigens and the use of flow cytometry improved allograft survival. The leading cause of death in the past 7 years in cadaveric recipients was cardiac (52%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved graft survival in the past 25 years was related to 1) advances in immunosuppression, 2) better methods of cytotoxic antibody detection, and 3) human lymphocyte antigen match.     

Isolated Hepatic Chronic Ductopenic Rejection Requiring Liver Retransplant in the Absence of Kidney Graft Rejection After Combined Liver-Kidney Transplant: A Case Report

The liver is considered the most immunotolerant organ among all solid-organ transplants. Liver transplant recipients have a lower incidence of rejection and better outcomes after episodes of rejection, with spontaneous operational tolerance developing in up to 20%. In multiorgan transplants, a protective effect of the liver allograft on simultaneously transplanted organs from the same donor has been demonstrated. We describe an unusual case of isolated liver allograft rejection in a patient with polycystic liver and kidney disease who received a combined liver-kidney transplant from the same donor. After initial discharge from the hospital, our patient had 2 episodes of biopsy-proven late acute cellular rejections, despite higher levels of immunosuppression required for her kidney allograft, which were addressed with pulsed steroid therapy. She had no evidence of ischemic cholangiopathy on imaging. Later, a subsequent liver biopsy demonstrated features consistent with chronic ductopenic rejection. She was eventually listed for liver retransplant and has recently received a second liver transplant while continuing to have no concerns with her kidney allograft function. Examination of the explanted liver confirmed graft loss from chronic ductopenic rejection. The exact reasons why our patient developed acute graft rejection progressing to chronic end-stage rejection of the liver allograft despite not developing graft rejection in the kidney allograft from the same donor remains elusive. Our experience demonstrates that graft tolerance in multiorgan transplant recipients can be organ specific and despite the belief of “immunologic privilege,” isolated liver allograft rejection can occur in multiorgan transplant, resulting in graft loss.     

The flow cytometric crossmatch and early renal transplant loss

Data from this retrospective study indicate that a positive two-color T and/or B cell flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) is predictive of early renal allograft loss (less than 2 months) in cadaveric kidney donor recipients who had a negative crossmatch by the antihuman globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity technique. Among 90 cadaveric kidney donor recipients (67 primary, 23 regrafts), 14 (8 primary, 6 regrafts) lost their renal allografts within 2 months, and 10 of the 14 were FCXM positive and HLA sensitized. The remaining 76 allografts survived beyond 2 months, 12 of which were FCXM-positive. Thus, the FCXM sensitivity rate for detecting early graft loss was 71%, and the specificity rate was 84%. Cadaveric graft-loss rates at 2 months were 33% for primary and 60% for FCXM-positive regrafts in contrast to 7% for primary and 0% for FCXM-negative regrafts. The difference in early graft loss between FCXM-positive and FCXM-negative recipients was statistically significant (P less than 0.0001). Subset analyses of FCXM-positive graft recipients indicate: (1) previous early graft loss contraindicates transplantation of an FXCM-positive regraft (P = 0.03); and (2) panel reactive antibody (PRA) less than or equal to 10% at crossmatch is not associated with early graft loss (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in 1-year graft survival between primary and regrafts in either FCXM-negative recipients (85% vs. 77%, respectively) or FCXM-positive recipients (67% vs. 40%). All 12 of the FCXM-positive primary and regrafts that survived 2 months continued to function at 2 years. Stepwise logistic regression analysis of 5 independent predictor variables (FCXM status, gender, primary vs. regraft status, PRA level, and HLA mismatched antigens) indicated that the FCXM test was the best predictor of early graft loss. When FCXM results of the 90 cadaveric graft recipients were ranked in three groups, an FCXM channel shift of 29 or greater (third tertile) on a 1024 channel log scale was associated with a 7.0-fold (95% confidence interval 1.9-25.5) increased risk of early graft failure when compared to the first two tertiles. These data indicate that the FCXM offers an additional approach for identifying sensitized patients at risk of early renal allograft loss.     

In vitro and in vivo effects of monoclonal antibodies against T cell subsets on allogeneic and xenogeneic responses in the rat

The Syrian hamster-to-rat represents an example of a concordant species difference, and therefore organ transplants using the hamster as the donor and the rat as the recipient are not rejected hyperacutely, as in discordant species combinations. Cellular mechanisms of xenogeneic rejection of hamster hearts by rats were studied both in vitro and in vivo, using monoclonal antibodies to rat T cell antigens. The results of this study reveal that CD4-positive cells of rats proliferated in vitro to both allogeneic stimulators and xenogeneic stimulators from a concordant strain, but required accessory cells of the responder phenotype to proliferate to discordant human stimulators. Monoclonal antibody therapy was used to prevent graft rejection in allogeneic and xenogeneic species combinations, using the rat as the recipient. Treatment with anti-CD4 antibodies was effective in prolonging allograft survival across a full MHC mismatch. No rejection occurred during antibody therapy, and long-term graft survival was achieved in 1/3 of transplanted grafts. The same monoclonal antibody therapy led to increased survival of grafts from hamster donors, but all of these grafts were rejected during therapy, and no long-term graft survival was achieved. Anti-CD8 antibody therapy, combined with anti-CD4 did not improve survival of hamster hearts in rats. Addition of cyclosporine to the anti-CD4 regimen also did not improve graft survival. Injection of an anti-T cell receptor antibody was no better than the anti-CD4 antibody in prolonging the survival times of heart grafts from the concordant xenogeneic species. These data suggest that the rejection of concordant xenogeneic tissue is not wholly a T cell-dependent phenomenon.     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant from living related donor: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeutic option for insulin-dependent uremic patients. In 1996 the first SPK from a live donor was performed. This procedure offers the advantage of a better immunologic match, reduced cold ischemia injury, and decreased waiting time. As such, it is an attractive alternative treatment for diabetic patients with end-stage nephropathy with an available living donor. METHODS: We performed six SPKs from living-related donors. There were four men and two women among the recipients; median age was 34 (range, 29-39) years. All donors were recipients' siblings with excellent HLA matching. Donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, anti-insulin and anti-islet antibody assays, and computed tomography of the abdomen. Both donors and recipients were treated with octreotide for 5 days perioperatively. After transplantation, the patients were maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the exception of one recipient of SPK from an identical twin, who received cyclosporine monotherapy. RESULTS: All the donors are doing well and have normal renal function and blood glucose levels. One-year patient, renal, and pancreatic graft survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 83%, respectively. Acute kidney rejection was documented in two patients, and both recovered completely after OKT3 therapy. No rejection of pancreatic graft has been documented. Except for one patient who lost the graft because of hemorrhagic pancreatitis, all recipients maintained serum glucose levels at less than 130 mg/dL without insulin therapy. No major surgical complications such as graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, or abscess were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor SPK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK. The procedure can be performed safely in the donor and with low morbidity in the recipient.     

Antibody‐Mediated Rejection—An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure

The presence of preformed, donor‐specific alloantibodies inpatients undergoing renal transplantation is associated with a high risk of hyperacute and acute antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR), and often limits potential recipients’ access to organs from living and deceased donors. Over the last decade, understanding of ABMR has improved markedly and given rise to numerous, diverse strategies for the transplantation of allosensitized recipients. Antibody desensitization programs have been developed to allow renal transplant recipients with a willing but antibody‐incompatible living donor to undergo successful transplantation, whereas kidney paired exchange schemes circumvent the antibody incompatibility altogether by finding suitable pairs to donors and recipients. Recognizing the complexity of ABMR and the recent developments that have occurred in this important clinical research field, the Roche Organ Transplantation Research Foundation (ROTRF) organized a symposium during the XXIII Congress of The Transplantation Society in Vancouver, Canada, to discuss current understanding in ABMR and ways to prevent it. This Meeting Report summarizes the presentations of the symposium, which addressed key areas that included the interactions between alloantibodies and the complement system in mediating graft injury, technological advancements for assessing antibody‐mediated immune responses to HLA antigens, and the potential benefits and challenges of desensitization and kidney paired donation schemes.     

Immunological studies in diabetic rat recipients with a pancreatic islet cell allograft in the brain

Intracerebrally (IC) transplanted outbred Wistar and inbred Lewis (AgB1/1) strain rat islets and pancreatic endocrine cells (PEC) were able to function for a prolonged period in nonimmunosuppressed diabetic inbred ACI (AgB4/4) rats across a major histocompatibility barrier. All recipients were sensitized to various degrees to the donor antigens, as demonstrated by circulating cytotoxic antibody, irrespective of the survival of the IC graft. Nevertheless, the antidonor antibody titers in the IC islet and PEC graft recipients were lower and peaked later when compared with ACI recipients that received an intraportal islet allograft. PEC were also transplanted IC in immunized ACI recipients. In recipients hyperimmunized by repeated splenocyte injections, accelerated PEC graft rejection was observed. In recipients with weaker immunization by intraportal whole islet allograft 2 months prior to the IC allograft, the IC PEC allografts were also rejected. To assess if ACI rats with long-term-functioning IC islet/PEC allograft developed tolerance to the donor antigens, these animals were transplanted with a donor-strain skin graft. The skin grafts were all rejected in a first-set fashion similar to normal control ACI rats. Also, 7/12 and 7/9 recipients rejected their functional IC islet or PEC allograft, respectively, following transplantation of a donor-strain skin allograft, thus indicating that the transplanted PEC maintained their antigenicity even after long-term survival of over 1 year in allogeneic recipients. The data indicate that the brain does possess immunoprotective properties for the islet/PEC allograft. The protection, however, is relatively weak and is possibly due to the paucity of the effector mechanism in the brain relative to that normally present systemically.     

Organ Specificity in Hyperacute Rejection of Canine Heart and Kidney Allografts

To clarify the organ specific nature of hyperacute rejection, 14 puppies were presensitized by multiple skin grafts and spleen cell injections prior to receiving either a heart or kidney allograft from the respective donors. Of this group, 7 received orthotopic heart allografts and 7 received kidney allografts. All heart allografts were rejected between 3 and 28 hours, and all kidneys between 0 and 24 hours as judged by cessation of urine flow from the ureterostomies. In contrast, all 11 animals in a recent series of heart allografts in non-sensitized puppies survived the operation, and rejected between 7 and 17 days. There was a significant correlation in both groups between preoperative cytotoxic antibody titer in the recipient serum and graft survival time. The preoperative titers were all above 1:1,024 but were greatly reduced within 2 hours after transplantation. At the time of rejection, antibody could be eluted from the rejected organs. In contrast to the kidneys, in which 2 of 7 grafts ceased to function immediately after revascularization, all hearts resumed beating and functioned well for at least several hours. At autopsy, the myocardium was pale and edematous and histologically polymorphonuclear leukocytes were prevalent in and around the small vessels and among myofibers. Both IgG and IgM antibody was detected in sarcolemma of the myocardium and to a lesser extent in the intima and adventitia of the small vessels by the fluorescent antibody technique. Biopsies of the rejected kidneys showed polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration, typical of hyperacute rejection. Marked fluorescence of IgG and IgM in the glomeruli and peritubular capillaries was observed. This study indicates that both organs rejected hyperacutely in our experimental model and participation of the preformed antibody in effecting this change was strongly suggested.     

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.