Oncogene status as a diagnostic tool in ocular and cutaneous melanoma

The majority of human tumours can be easily and correctly diagnosed based on clinical information and pathological assessment. In some cases however, correct diagnosis can prove difficult. In such cases, molecular approaches can be of significant diagnostic value. In recent years, the understanding of genetic alterations has greatly increased. In cutaneous melanoma, it is now well recognised, that 70–80% of tumours harbour BRAF and NRAS mutations. These mutations never occur in uveal melanoma. On the other hand activating GNAQ and GNA11 mutations are found in ∼90% of uveal melanomas, and are exceptionally rare in other melanomas (<1%).Here, we demonstrate a number of melanoma cases, where distinguishing if a tumour was of cutaneous or ocular origin was not possible based on clinical and pathological assessment. In these cases there was either atypical clinical presentation or metastasis of unclear primary. Histological distinction between uveal and cutaneous melanomas, especially at the stage of metastasis, is not reliable as they can be morphologically very similar.In all cases we present, a simple genetic assessment of oncogene mutation status was able to clearly define the melanoma type. This type of genetic assessment is of great diagnostic value and due to its simplicity could be performed in routine clinical practice even in smaller institutions.     

Establishment and characterization of human ocular melanoma cell lines

Five continuous cell lines have been established from 29 ocular melanomas and maintained for periods ranging from 3 to 9 years in medium identical to that in which 3 concomitantly studied lines of cutaneous melanoma cells were cultured as controls. The long-term problems to be overcome in establishing uveal cell lines are related to cell-doubling times which ranged from 72 to 432 hr, and plating efficiency, which ranged from 0.5%–6.5%. Tumors and cell lines were found to contain melanosomes. The morphology of uveal cells during the early subcultures exhibited multiple changes. Two different established cell lines were obtained from one ciliary-body tumor. Biochemical studies revealed markers of melanogenesis and neuroendocrine compounds. Cytogenetic studies revealed chromosomal abnormalities that differed between uveal and conjunctival melanomas.     

TERT promoter mutations in ocular melanoma distinguish between conjunctival and uveal tumours

Background:

Recently, activating mutations in the TERT promoter were identified in cutaneous melanoma. We tested a cohort of ocular melanoma samples for similar mutations.

Methods:

The TERT promoter region was analysed by Sanger sequencing in 47 uveal (ciliary body or choroidal) melanomas and 38 conjunctival melanomas.

Results:

Mutations of the TERT promoter were not identified in uveal melanomas, but were detected in 12 (32%) conjunctival melanomas. Mutations had a UV signature and were identical to those found in cutaneous melanoma.

Conclusion:

Mutations of TERT promoter with UV signatures are frequent in conjunctival melanomas and favour a pathogenetic kinship with cutaneous melanomas. Absence of these mutations in uveal melanomas emphasises their genetic distinction from cutaneous and conjunctival melanomas.     

Maligne Melanome am Auge des Erwachsenen

Malignant melanomas are the most frequent pernicious eye tumours in adults. This article reviews some selected characteristics of these tumours. There are three different manifestations of ocular melanoma: melanoma of the eyelid, melanoma of the conjunctiva, and uveal melanoma. Eyelid melanomas behave clinically and biologically like cutaneous melanomas. Conjunctival melanomas are rare and are commonly associated with a primary acquired melanosis of the conjunctiva or with conjunctival naevi. Their treatment comprises excision, brachytherapy and adjuvant local treatment. Melanoma of the uvea is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumour in adults. The diagnosis of choroidal melanoma is based on clinical investigation. Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for this tumour type, although combined treatment modalities including surgical excision are applied in special cases like huge tumours. Conservation of the bulb and maintenance of the best possible visual performance are the secondary goals of the treatment strategy, beside the primary goal to minimize the risk for metastasis.     

Relationship of uveal and cutaneous malignant melanoma in persons with multiple primary tumors

Uveal and cutaneous melanomas differ in tumor biology, immunophenotypes and the demographic correlates of their occurrence. As a means to examine the possibility of some shared etiologic factors, we wished to learn if the 2 cancers occurred in the same individual more often than would be expected by chance. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program from 1973-1998 were utilized for this purpose. The number of persons who went on to develop a second melanoma was compared to that expected based on the incidence of each type of melanoma in the general population, after adjusting for age, sex, calendar year and residence. Given an initial cutaneous melanoma, there was a 10-fold increased risk of developing a second cutaneous melanoma (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.4-10.6). Persons with uveal melanoma went on to develop cutaneous melanoma 4.6 times (95% CI = 2.9-6.8) more often than the population at large. In contrast, persons with cutaneous melanoma were not subsequently diagnosed with uveal melanoma at an appreciably elevated rate (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.5-3.0). While these data offer some support for the hypothesis that uveal and cutaneous melanomas have 1 or more etiologies in common, the lack of symmetry in the pattern of second uveal and second cutaneous melanomas remains unexplained.     

Uveal melanoma: From diagnosis to treatment and the science in between

Melanomas of the choroid, ciliary body, and iris of the eye are collectively known as uveal melanomas. These cancers represent 5% of all melanoma diagnoses in the United States, and their age‐adjusted risk is 5 per 1 million population. These less frequent melanomas are dissimilar to their more common cutaneous melanoma relative, with differing risk factors, primary treatment, anatomic spread, molecular changes, and responses to systemic therapy. Once uveal melanoma becomes metastatic, therapy options are limited and are often extrapolated from cutaneous melanoma therapies despite the routine exclusion of patients with uveal melanoma from clinical trials. Clinical trials directed at uveal melanoma have been completed or are in progress, and data from these well designed investigations will help guide future directions in this orphan disease. Cancer 2016;122:2299–2312 . © 2016 American Cancer Society.     

Lack of BRAF mutations in uveal melanoma

RAF proteins are serine/threonine kinases that mediate cellular responses to growth signals by activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Mutations in the BRAF gene causing a V599E amino acid substitution that enhance the kinase activity have been described in >60% of cutaneous melanomas and premalignant melanocytic lesions. We have investigated the frequency of BRAF mutations at the expression level in melanomas of the uveal tract. None of the 30 metastases and 10 primary uveal melanomas tested expressed the V599E mutation. In contrast, this mutation was expressed by 65% of cutaneous melanoma samples, confirming previous results. In addition, a double mutation resulting in V599K substitution was detected in two suspect ocular metastases of cutaneous melanoma. Analysis of exon 11, the second common site of BRAF mutations, revealed only wild-type sequences in uveal melanomas. Analysis of tumor lysates showed the presence of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase, kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase in 50% of uveal and 100% of cutaneous melanoma metastases. Taken together, these results suggest that although the common BRAF mutations found in cutaneous melanoma do not play a role in tumorigenesis of uveal tract melanocytes, activation of the RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway may nevertheless play an important role in uveal melanoma.     

Cutaneous dysplastic naevi in uveal melanoma patients: markers for prognosis?

We have previously reported that the presence of cutaneous dysplastic naevi is a risk factor for uveal melanoma. In the present study our goal was to determine the incidence of different histopathological features of uveal melanoma among 91 patients with or without cutaneous dysplastic naevi. Statistical analysis revealed that the presence of cutaneous dysplastic naevi in uveal melanoma patients is associated with an increased incidence of the prognostically worst forms of uveal melanoma (epithelioid or mixed cell type melanomas). The relative risk was 5.97 (95% confidence interval 1.61-22.14). Our results suggest that the presence of cutaneous dysplastic naevi is not only a risk factor but also a prognostic factor for uveal melanoma.     

Increased chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan expression (B5 immunoreactivity) in metastases of uveal melanoma

Background: Metastatic uveal melanoma has a poor prognosis andlimited therapeutic options. Proteoglycans are involved in tumorcell invasion and metastatic behavior. The mAbB5 stains a chondroitinsulphate proteoglycan (CSPG) on cutaneous melanoma cells. Here,we compare the B5-staining of CSPG in primaries and metastasesof uveal melanoma. Material and methods: Immunohistopathological staining was performedin 15 cutaneous and 39 uveal melanoma samples. A score for intracellularand surface staining was established. B5 staining was comparedin primaries and metastases of uveal melanoma using Student'st-test. Results: Eight of 11 (73%) uveal melanoma metastases were positivefor B5-staining whereas only 5 of 28 (18%) primary uveal melanomasamples were B5-positive (P < 0.001). Nine of 15 cutaneousmelanoma samples (60%) were B5-positive without significantdifference between primary and metastatic lesions. Surface stainingwas found both on uveal melanoma metastases and cutaneous melanomas. Conclusions: CSPG was expressed significantly more often inmetastases than in primaries of uveal melanoma. It potentiallymay be one factor associated with metastatic spread. Furtherstudies are needed to determine its use as prognostic factor.The mAbB5 may also be a promising tool for immunotherapy dueto its strong staining of CSPG on the surface of cutaneous andmetastatic uveal melanoma cells. Key words: uveal melanoma, ocular melanoma, chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan, immunotherapy, immunohistochemistry     

Surface antigenic profile of uveal melanoma lesions analysed with a panel of monoclonal antibodies directed against cutaneous melanoma.

The surface antigenic profile of 10 surgically removed uveal melanoma lesions and 5 conjunctival melanomas was analyzed with a panel of 22 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) raised against membrane bound cutaneous melanoma-associated antigens (MAA). In addition these lesions were tested for their reactivity with mAbs against MHC class I and II molecules, CD7 (Pan-T) and CD10 (CALLA). The anti-MAA mAbs can be divided into two major groups: first those mAbs detecting markers expressed by the majority of uveal melanomas such as NKI-Beteb, NKI/C3, G7E2, M-2-2-4, Mel-14, G7A5, AMF6, AMF7, Pal M1, Pal M2, Me14/D12. The staining intensity for these mAbs was rather high, ranging in intensity between 70 and 100%. The second group of antibodies includes mAbs detecting markers not or very poorly expressed on ocular melanomas. The anti-ICAM-1 mAb P358 did not react with any of the lesions tested and mAb Muc18 and Muc54 only with one and two out of 15 lesions, respectively. The majority of spindle lesions and mixed type lesions and half of the epitheloid type lesions expressed HLA class I molecules, while HLA class II molecules were found on half of the spindle and epitheloid type lesions and on a small number of mixed cell type lesions. All spindle lesions were found to express the CD10 (CALLA) molecule and less than half of the other type of lesions were stained with an anti CD10 mAb. The melanoma associated ganglioside GD3 was mainly expressed on epitheloid type lesions while GD2 was predominantly expressed on mixed type lesions. In essence, the overall surface phenotype of the uveal melanoma lesions tested, as defined by the panel of mAbs used, differs markedly from the surface phenotype of cutaneous melanoma lesions defined by a very similar antibody panel.     

A multimodal approach to eye melanoma: patterns of care and related complications

We describe the results of multimodal treatment of uveal and conjunctival melanomas. A retrospective analysis was performed on 54 patients treated with a multimodal approach between 2003 and 2008 in a single institution. Main outcome measures were survival, enucleation rate, local tumor control, visual function preservation and complications associated with treatments. The median follow-up was 33.4 months. The 5-year overall survival was 95.3%, the local recurrence was 3.7% and the 5-year enucleation was 9.4%. Vision preservation was achieved in 84% of cases. Observed complications were cataract, retinal detachment, diplopia, glaucoma, retinopathy, optic neuropathy and scleral necrosis. A careful consideration of treatment of uveal melanoma in this study allowed us to obtain the survival rates and visual outcomes similar to previously published results, with a very small incidence of complications. the results must be interpreted in the light of recent findings on the genetic pattern of uveal melanoma.     

45例中国人眼部恶性黑色素瘤GNAQ突变分析

目的 探讨中国人眼部恶性黑色素瘤GNAQ的突变情况,并分析GNAQ突变与眼部黑色素瘤临床病理特征的关系。方法 收集45例中国人眼部恶性黑色素瘤组织标本（葡萄膜黑色素瘤27例,非葡萄膜黑色素瘤18例）,采用PCR扩增和基因测序方法检测GNAQ第4、5号外显子突变情况。结果GNAQ在45例眼部恶性黑色素瘤患者中的突变率为35.6％（16／45）。16例突变样本中,Q209突变有12例（75.0％）。GNAQ在葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中的突变率为51.9％（14／27）,在非葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中的突变率为11.1％（2／18）,差异有统计学意义（P=0.005）。GNAQ突变与性别、年龄、有无溃疡和是否发生远处转移均无关。结论GNAQ在中国人眼部恶性黑色素瘤,尤其是葡萄膜黑色素瘤中的突变频率较高,为以GNAQ为靶点的中国人眼部恶性黑色素瘤治疗研究提供了线索。     

Immunohistochemical diagnosis of malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva and uvea: comparison of the novel antibody against melan-A with S100 protein and HMB-45

A novel antibody A103, which recognizes melan-A/MART-1, has been found to be more sensitive than the antibody HMB-45, which recognizes gp100, in melanocytic lesions of the skin and might therefore also be useful in the diagnosis of uveal and conjunctival melanocytic lesions. In this study we compared the staining characteristics of anti-melan-A, anti-S100 protein and HMB-45 in 13 conjunctival, 11 iris and 37 ciliary and choroidal malignant melanomas. The ciliary and choroidal melanomas comprised 13 spindle cell (10 spindle B and three spindle A), 14 mixed cell and 10 epithelioid cell tumours. In the conjunctival melanomas the diagnostic sensitivity was 100% for anti-S100 and anti-melan-A and 85% for HMB-45. In the iris melanomas the sensitivity was 100% for anti-S100 and anti-melan-A and 55% for HMB-45. A high staining intensity of anti-melan-A was particularly noticed in iris melanomas. In the choroidal malignant melanomas, the spindle cell and mixed cell types showed a sensitivity of only 69-79% with all three antibodies. In the epithelioid cell type the sensitivity was 80% for anti-S100 and 100% for HMB-45 and anti-melan-A. In conclusion, anti-melan-A was found to be a useful addition to antibody panels for ocular melanocytic lesions. Anti-melan-A has a higher sensitivity than HMB-45 in conjunctival and iris melanomas, but the sensitivity is similar to HMB-45 in choroidal melanomas. Anti-melan-A stains in a very similar pattern to anti-S100, but the staining intensity of anti-melan-A is higher than that of anti-S100 in iris melanoma.     

Absence of BRAF gene mutations in uveal melanomas in contrast to cutaneous melanomas

The recent discovery of activating mutations in the BRAF gene in many cutaneous melanomas led us to screen the genomic sequence of BRAF exons 11 and 15 in a series of 48 intraocular (uveal) melanomas, together with control samples from three cutaneous melanomas and the SK-Mel-28 cell line, which has a BRAF mutation. The same mutation was detected in two-thirds of our cutaneous melanoma samples, but was not present in any uveal melanomas. This finding further underlines the distinction between uveal and cutaneous melanomas, and suggests that BRAF inhibitors are unlikely to benefit patients with uveal melanoma.     

Characterization of gangliosides in human uveal melanoma cells

We have evaluated the ganglioside composition of 20 primary uveal melanomas, of 2 cell lines derived from 2 uveal melanomas, of a liver metastasis from an uveal melanoma, and of 8 normal choroids. The results show that normal choroid tissue has a ganglioside content similar to the primary tumors of uveal melanoma except for GD1a, GD1b, and GT1b, which are present only on normal choroid tissues. On the other hand, the uveal melanomas have similarities with cutaneous melanomas, since GM3 (74%) and GD3 (25%) are found in both tissues and are present in about the same amounts. However, GM1 was found in 50%, GM2 in 20% and GD2 in none of the uveal melanomas. According to data published by others, cutaneous melanoma biopsies have no GM1, whereas GM2 is present in 100% and GD2 in 71% of tumor tissues. Transplantation of the 2 cell lines subcutaneously into nude mice resulted in the growth of tumors which had a ganglioside profile larger than that of the primary tumors. GM3 was significantly diminished and GD3 significantly increased in the primary uveal melanoma from patients who had received radiotherapy before enucleation compared with those who did not have radiotherapy. These results show that uveal melanomas contain gangliosides that could be used as targets for monoclonal antibody therapy.     

Instability of microsatellites is an infrequent event in uveal melanoma

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a distinct tumour phenotype that is associated with alterations of DNA mismatch repair and is being increasingly reported in a number of hereditary and sporadic tumours. Numerous reports have suggested that melanocytic neoplasms, including cutaneous melanomas, frequently demonstrate low frequency MSI, whilst a small number of tumours exhibit high frequency MSI. Furthermore, loss of expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins has been associated with progression from benign to malignant disease in melanocytic neoplasms, but the presence or absence of mismatch repair defects in uveal melanomas has yet to be determined. This study was designed to establish whether MSI is a feature of these ocular melanomas. To investigate the prevalence of MSI in uveal melanomas, 52 tumours were analysed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a panel of microsatellite markers selected for their ability to detect tumours exhibiting defects in DNA mismatch repair mechanisms. MSI was rarely detected in the 52 uveal melanomas analysed. All tumours demonstrated stable microsatellites at five of the six microsatellite markers tested (BAT26, BAT40, APC, D2S123 and Mfd15CA). Only one tumour showed the presence of a single unstable allele at a tetranucleotide marker (MYCL1). These data suggest that high frequency MSI does not occur in these tumours, and that low frequency MSI, in contrast to cutaneous melanoma, is a rare event in malignant melanomas of the uveal tract.     

Prognostic factors in uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumour, with an annual incidence of approximately six cases per million per year. Approximately 40% of patients with posterior uveal melanoma develop metastatic melanoma to the liver within 10 years after initial diagnosis. Despite high accuracy of diagnosis and availability of various methods of treatment; the mortality due to uveal melanoma has remained unchanged. The prognosis in uveal melanoma depends on clinical, histopathological and cytological factors. Clinical factors that relate to prognosis include location, size, and configuration of the tumour. Uveal melanoma can arise in the iris, the ciliary body or the choroid. Iris melanomas have the best prognosis and ciliary body melanomas have the worst prognosis. Based on retrospective studies, the mortality rates for uveal melanoma for comparable sized tumours treated by enucleation or other globe conserving methods such as radiotherapy appear to be similar. Histopathological factors such as cell type, mitotic activity, microcirculation architecture, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and the presence of extrascleral extension are also significant predictors of survival. More recently, cytological factors such as cell proliferation, cytogenic, and molecular genetic prognostic markers have been identified with the hope of detecting high risk cases for adjuvant systemic immune therapy or chemotherapy. At present, the role of these therapeutic methods is not clearly established.     

Uveal melanoma: natural history and treatment options for metastatic disease

In order to evaluate the natural history, prognostic parameters and treatment modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma, a review of the clinical data from the current literature was performed based on a Medline database search. Uveal melanoma represents approximately 5% of all melanomas. It is a distinct clinico-pathological entity, differing in many aspects from cutaneous melanoma. The clinical course is unpredictable and metastatic disease can develop very late after a long disease-free interval. Uveal melanoma metastasizes haematogenously, predominantly to the liver. The most Important prognostic parameters for primary uveal melanoma are tumour diameter, the patient's age and gender, histological features and tumour location. Systemic chemotherapy that is effective in cutaneous melanoma has failed to show activity in uveal melanoma. So far only the BOLD chemotherapy regimen (dacarbazine, lomustine, vincristine and bleomycin) combined with interferon-alpha has been shown to produce an objective tumour response in approximately 20% of previously untreated patients. For metastatic disease localized to the liver, intra-arterial application of fotemustine or carboplatin or chemoembolization with cisplatin have shown useful activity, resulting in a response in up to 40% of patients. Selected patients may benefit from palliative surgery. Immunotherapy with interleukin-2 or interferon-alpha has not shown consistent activity in metastatic uveal melanoma. In conclusion, patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver should undergo one of the local treatment options. Carefully selected patients with extrahepatic disease or patients failing local treatment may benefit from systemic therapy using the BOLD regimen combined with interferon.