Differential Roles of CD8+ and CD8− T Lymphocytes in Corneal Allograft Rejection in ''High-Risk'' Hosts

We examined the role of perforin and FasL in corneal allograft rejection mediated by CD8+ and CD8 T cells. BALB/c corneas were transplanted orthotopically into vascularized, 'high-risk' graft beds in C57BL/6 mice, perforin knockout mice and FasL-defective gld/gld mice. CD8+ and CD8 T cells were collected following graft rejection and adoptively transferred to SCID mice, which were then challenged with BALB/c corneal allografts. In every case, CD8 T cells could mediate graft rejection when adoptively transferred to SCID mice that received BALB/c corneal allografts. Although CD8+ T cells also mediated graft rejection, the tempo was slower. Moreover, CD8+ T cells collected FasL-defective donors that had rejected corneal allografts, mediated corneal allograft rejection in only 50% of the SCID mice that received the adoptively transferred cells. In some cases, CD8+ T-cell-mediated rejection occurred in the absence of delayed-type hypersensitivity and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity, but was associated with CD8+ T-cell-mediated apoptosis of BALB/c corneal cells in vitro. The results demonstrate the redundancy in immune mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection. Either CD8+ or CD8 T cells can produce corneal allograft rejection, however functional FasL is necessary for optimal rejection, even in a high-risk setting.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine skin and heart allograft rejection across different antigenic desparities

The factors that influence the relative contribution of the T cell subsets to allograft rejection remain unclear. We compared skin and heart rejection in CD4 Knockout (KO), and CD8 KO mice across full-, minor-, and class II histocompatibility antigen (HA) mismatches. Skin allografts were rejected by either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells alone at any degree of antigenic mismatch. However, either the absence of CD4+ cells or a lesser degree of HA mismatch resulted in prolongation of graft survival. In contrast, fully allogeneic heart grafts were accepted in CD4 KO recipients, and minor HA mismatched heart grafts were accepted by both CD4 KO and CD8 KO mice. Thus, the T cell subsets required for allograft rejection are determined by the immunogenicity of the tissue transplanted. In the absence of CD8+ T cells, perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) but not granzyme B mRNA were detected in rejecting grafts. Thus, granzyme B is a CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-specific effector molecule.     

Allorecognition and effector pathways of islet allograft rejection in normal versus nonobese diabetic mice

Islet transplantation is becoming an accepted therapy to cure type I diabetes mellitus. The exact mechanisms of islet allograft rejection remain unclear, however. In vivo CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell-depleting strategies and genetically altered mice that did not express MHC class I or class II antigens were used to study the allorecognition and effector pathways of islet allograft rejection in different strains of mice, including autoimmunity-prone nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. In BALB/c mice, islet rejection depended on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. In C57BL/6 mice, CD8(+) T cells could eventually mediate islet rejection by themselves, but they produced rejection more efficiently with help from CD4(+) T cells stimulated through either the direct or indirect pathway. In C57BL/6 mice, CD4(+) T cells alone caused islet rejection when only the direct pathway was available but not when only the indirect pathway was available. In contrast, in NOD mice, CD4(+) T cells alone, with only the indirect pathway, could mediate islet and cardiac allograft rejection. These findings indicate that different mouse strains can make use of different pathways for T cell-mediated rejection of islet allografts. In addition, they demonstrate that NOD mice, which develop autoimmunity and are known to be resistant to tolerance induction, have an unusually powerful CD4(+) cell indirect mechanism that can cause rejection of both islet and cardiac allografts. These data shed light on the mechanisms of islet allograft rejection in different responder strains, including those with autoimmunity.     

Role of lymphokine in islet allograft rejection

Primed CD8 T cells transfer allograft immunity to an established islet allograft. However, the process is inhibited by cyclosporine, suggesting that lymphokine production is required for islet graft rejection. The alloreactive T cell clone L3 will transfer allograft immunity, and this process is also sensitive to CsA. The L3 clone produces gamma-interferon and tumor necrosis factor but not IL-2 and IL-3. It follows therefore that the latter lymphokines are not required for the rejection process. Pretreatment of islet tissue with gamma-IFN prior to grafting increases the density of the class I major histocompatibility complex antigen on the islet tissue, and CsA can no longer block the destruction of this MHC-induced tissue by primed alloreactive T cells. We conclude that gamma-IFN, and possibly TNF, act cooperatively with cytotoxic function in the process of islet allograft rejection.     

Interferon Gamma and Contact‐dependent Cytotoxicity Are Each Rate Limiting for Natural Killer Cell–Mediated Antibody‐dependent Chronic Rejection

Natural killer (NK) cells are key components of the innate immune system. In murine cardiac transplant models, donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), in concert with NK cells, are sufficient to inflict chronic allograft vasculopathy independently of T and B cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the effector mechanism(s) required by NK cells to trigger chronic allograft vasculopathy during antibody‐mediated rejection. Specifically, we tested the relative contribution of the proinflammatory cytokine interferon gamma (IFN‐γ) versus the contact‐dependent cytotoxic mediators of perforin and the CD95/CD95L (Fas/Fas ligand [FasL]) pathway for triggering these lesions. C3H/HeJ cardiac allografts were transplanted into immune‐deficient C57BL/6 rag^?/?γc^?/? recipients, who also received monoclonal anti–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I DSA. The combination of DSA and wild‐type NK cell transfer triggered aggressive chronic allograft vasculopathy. However, transfer of IFN‐γ–deficient NK cells or host IFN‐γ neutralization led to amelioration of these lesions. Use of either perforin‐deficient NK cells or CD95 (Fas)–deficient donors alone did not alter development of vasculopathy, but simultaneous disruption of NK cell–derived perforin and allograft Fas expression resulted in prevention of these abnormalities. Therefore, both NK cell IFN‐γ production and contact‐dependent cytotoxic activity are rate‐limiting effector pathways that contribute to this form of antibody‐induced chronic allograft vasculopathy.     

CD8(+) T cells resistant to costimulatory blockade are controlled by an antagonist interleukin-15/Fc protein

BACKGROUND: Although permanent engraftment is often achieved with new therapeutics, chronic rejection and graft failure still occur. As the importance of CD8(+) T cells in rejection processes has been underlined in various transplant models, and as interleukin (IL)-15 is involved in the activation of CD8(+) T cells, we hypothesize that CD8(+) T cell "escape" from costimulation blockade might be a IL-15/IL-15R dependent process. METHODS: In a murine islet allograft model employing a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched strain combination of Balb/c donors to CD4 C57BL/6 recipients, a monotherapy with the IL-15 antagonist, IL-15 mutant/Fcgamma2a, or the costimulatory blockade molecule, CTLA4/Fc, was used. In addition to monitoring graft survival, infiltration of alloreactive immune cells was analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry, and alloimmune response of proliferative CD8(+) T cells was measured in vivo. RESULTS: Sixty percent of the recipients treated with CTLA4/Fc acutely rejected their islet allograft, comparable to untreated control animals (50% survival). In contrast, the IL-15 antagonist proved to be highly effective, with 100% of recipients accepting their allograft. Immunohistology study demonstrated a remarkable decrease of CD8(+) T-cell intragraft infiltration in IL-15 mutant/Fcgamma2a treated animals with well-preserved islet architecture and a reduced frequency of proliferating alloreactive CD8(+) T cells in comparison with that of untreated and CTLA4/Fc treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we determined the efficacy and potential therapeutic benefit of the IL-15 antagonist on CD4-independent CD8(+) T-cell responses to alloantigens. Targeting the IL-15/IL-15R pathway represents a potent strategy to prevent rejection driven by CD8(+) T cells resistant to costimulation blockade.     

Further Analysis of the T-Cell Subsets and Pathways of Murine Cardiac Allograft Rejection

The present study examined the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in cardiac allograft rejection when either the direct or indirect pathway was eliminated for the CD4+ portion of the response. To study the pathways in vivo, we used genetically altered mouse strains that lack class II antigens as either the donors or recipients for cardiac transplantation. In contrast to earlier published studies, which used different strain combinations, we found that either CD4- or CD8-depletion prolonged cardiac allograft survival moderately, but not indefinitely, in an MHC-mismatched, minor-matched combination. When the CD4+ indirect pathway was eliminated, rapid graft rejection occurred when both T-cell subsets were present and when either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were depleted. When the CD4+ direct pathway was eliminated, rapid graft rejection occurred when both T-cell subsets were present, there was slow rejection when CD4+ T cells were eliminated, and no rejection was seen for more than 100 days when CD8+ T cells were eliminated. However, the long-surviving allografts on the recipients with only CD4+ cells and an indirect pathway did show evidence of chronic vasculopathy. Thus, either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells can mediate acute cardiac allograft rejection in these experiments when both pathways are available. In addition, CD4+ T cells can provide help for acute rejection through either the direct or indirect pathway. Finally, recipients who have only CD4+ cells and an indirect pathway do not demonstrate acute rejection, but do show evidence of chronic rejection.     

Apoptosis and allograft rejection in the absence of CD8+ T cells.

BACKGROUND: The requirement for cytotoxic T lymphocytes during allograft rejection is controversial. We previously demonstrated that CD8+ T cells are not necessary for allograft rejection or for the induction of apoptosis in rat small intestinal transplantation. In this study, we examined the mechanisms of apoptosis and rejection after liver transplantation in the absence of CD8+ T cells. METHODS: Either Lewis or dark agouti rat liver grafts were transplanted into Lewis recipients to create syngeneic and allogeneic combinations. CD8+ T cells were depleted in an additional allogeneic group by treatment with OX-8 mAb on day -1 and day 1 after liver transplant. RESULTS: Apoptosis and rejection were observed in both the CD8+ T cell-depleted allogeneic and allogeneic grafts by hematoxylin and eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling staining, and radiolabeled-annexin V in vivo imaging. Granzyme B and FasL were expressed in all allogeneic transplants, including those depleted of CD8+ T cells, indicating that a mononuclear cell other than a CD8+ T cell can be the source of these molecules during allograft rejection. Activation of the caspase cascade was detected in all rejecting allografts. Caspases 3, 8, and 9 were activated at similar significantly elevated levels in both allogeneic and CD8+ T cell-depleted liver grafts. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that in the absence of CD8+ T cells an alternative pathway, associated with granzyme B and FasL expression and activation of the caspase cascade, can mediate apoptosis and graft rejection.     

Distinct requirements for host CD80/CD86 costimulatory molecules in cardiac versus islet rejection

The role of B7 family members CD80 and CD86 in providing costimulatory signals to T cells is well established. Interestingly, previous studies show that host CD80/CD86 expression is required for cardiac allograft rejection. However, the role for host costimulation by CD80/CD86 molecules for the rejection of neovascularized islet allografts and xenografts is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether islet allografts and/or rat islet xenografts required host CD80/CD86 molecules for acute rejection. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57Bl/6 (B6, H-2(b)) or B6 CD80/CD86 double-deficient mice were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islet allografts or with WF (RT1(u)) islet xenografts. Nondiabetic B6 mice were grafted with BALB/c heterotopic cardiac allografts. Consistent with previous reports, BALB/c islet allografts were acutely rejected in wild-type B6 mice could survive long-term (>100 days) in B6 CD80/CD86-deficient animals. In stark contrast, both islet allografts and WF rat islet xenografts demonstrated acute rejection in both control B6 and in B6 CD80/CD86 deficient hosts. In conclusion, varied studies imply that the inherent pathways for rejecting primarily vascularized versus cellular allografts or xenografts may be distinct. The present study illustrates this concept by showing a marked difference in the role of host-derived CD80/CD86 costimulatory molecules for cardiac allograft versus islet allograft/xenograft rejection in vivo. Although such costimulation is rate limiting for cardiac allograft rejection, these same molecules are not necessary for acute rejection of either islet allografts or xenografts.     

The immunobiology of pig‐to‐nonhuman primate islet xenotransplantation: insights,innovation, and impact

Previous studies of pig‐to‐non‐human primate (NHP) islet xenotransplantation have provided important insights into the immune recognition and effector pathways operative in this relevant preclinical model. The specifics of the xenograft product, microenvironment at the implantation site, and the immunosuppressive regimen significantly influence the mechanisms underlying the rejection of xenogeneic islets. Our current understanding of the immunological barriers to survival of pig islets in NHPs is largely based on studies on intraportal islet xenografts and on comparisons with islet allografts. The demonstration of cell‐mediated rejection of intraportal porcine islet xenografts at about 1 month posttransplant in monkeys immunosuppressed with the same protocols that prevent monkey islet allograft rejection indicates that islet xenograft rejection involves cellular mechanisms that are not present in acute islet allograft rejection. While these mechanisms remain poorly defined the demonstration of long‐term diabetes reversal after intraportal islet xenotransplantation in non‐human primates immunosuppressed with anti‐CD40L but not with anti‐CD40 antibody‐based protocols suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of anti‐CD40L in this transplantation setting likely involves the depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T cells besides CD40:CD40L costimulation blockade. Rejection of intraportal islet xenografts in NHPs immunosuppressed with CTLA4‐Ig and rapamycin was mediated largely by IL‐15‐primed, CXCR3+CD8+ memory T cells recruited by IP‐10 (CXCL10) positive pig islets and macrophages that showed staining for IL‐12 and iNOS. Adding basiliximab induction and tacrolimus maintenance therapy to this protocol prevented rejection in 24 of 26 recipients followed for up to 275 days. Comparison of both groups suggests, though by no means conclusive, that prolongation of graft survival in this large cohort was associated with reduced direct T cell responses to xenoantigens, reduced proportion of intrahepatic (intragraft) B cells and IFN‐γ+ and IL‐17+ CD4 and CD8 T cells, and increased local production of immunoregulatory molecules linked with Tregs, including TGF‐β, Foxp3, HO‐1, and IL‐10. Anti‐pig non‐Gal IgG antibody elicitation was suppressed in both groups. We are currently exploring the concept of negative vaccination to markedly minimize the need for immunosuppression in islet xenotransplantation. Peritransplant administration of donor apoptotic cells extended pig‐to‐mouse islet xenograft survival to >250 days when combined with peritransplant B cell‐depletion and rapamycin. This costimulation blockade‐sparing, antigen‐specific immunotherapy is expected to cause rapid pretransplant clonal deletion of indirect and anergy of direct xenospecific T cells while inducing regulatory T cells. As anti‐CD40L antibodies, B cell depleting antibodies are expected to interfere with indirect antigen presentation, costimulation, and cytokine production required for optimal T cell proliferation, memory formation, and intragraft CD8+ effector function. It is conceivable that additional strategies must be employed in NHPs and eventually in diabetic patients to achieve – as previously with anti‐CD40L antibodies – more complete, yet selective depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T‐cells for the purpose of stable xenograft acceptance.     

A major role for host MHC class I antigen presentation for promoting islet allograft survival

The purpose of this study was to determine the role for CD8 T cells versus generalized MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation in islet allograft rejection and tolerance. Diabetic C57BI/6 (B6, H-2(b)) controls, C57BI/6 CD8-deficient (CD8 KO), or MHC class I-deficient C57BI/6 (beta 2m KO) recipients were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islets. Islet allografts were acutely rejected in untreated B6, CD8 KO, and in beta 2m KO mice, indicating that neither CD8 T cells nor host MHC class I is required for allograft rejection. We then determined the efficacy of costimulation blockade in these same strains. Costimulation blockade with anti-CD154 therapy facilitated long-term islet allograft survival in both B6 and in CD8 KO recipients. However, anti-CD154 treated beta 2m KO recipients were completely refractory to anti-CD154 therapy; all treated animals acutely rejected islet allografts with or without therapy. Also, anti-NK1.1 treatment of wild-type B6 mice abrogated graft prolongation following anti-CD154 therapy. Taken together, results show a dramatic distinction between two forms of MHC class I-restricted pathways in allograft prolongation. Although anti-CD154-induced allograft survival was CD8 T-cell independent, an intact host MHC class I-restricted (beta 2m-dependent) pathway is nevertheless necessary for allograft survival. This pathway required NK1.1+ cells, implicating NK and/or NKT cells in promoting allograft prolongation in vivo.     

移植抗原特异性转基因CD8+T细胞对白细胞介素2的依赖性

目的研究白细胞介素2（IL-2）在调节移植抗原特异性转基因CD8^＋T细胞介导的免疫排斥反应中的作用。方法将经荧光染科CFSE标记后的C57BL／6小鼠和2CTg小鼠（CD4敲除鼠）淋巴细胞分别植入经致死剂量γ射线照射过的两组DBA／2J小鼠体内，检测CD4^＋与CD8^＋T细胞在体内分裂增殖的时相，并用胞浆内IL-2标志染色方法测定活化后T细胞表达IL-2的能力。以Balb／c小鼠为供者，糖尿病2CTg小鼠和2C Tg-IL-2KO小鼠（IL-2敲除鼠）为受者，进行胰岛细胞移植。观察CD8^＋ T细胞在介导移植排斥中的作用。结果DBA／2J小鼠输注了C57BL／6小鼠的淋巴细胞后，CD4^＋与CD8^＋T细胞分裂增殖均非常明显，前者表达大量IL-2，后者则不表达。DBA／2J小鼠输注了2CTg小鼠的淋巴细胞后。在完全没有CD4^＋T细胞存在的情况下，CD8^＋T细胞仍明显分裂增殖并大量表达IL-2。2CTg和2CTg—IL-2KO小鼠移植胰岛细胞后，前者迅速发生排斥反应，胰岛移植物的平均存活时间仅为8d，而后者胰岛移植物的平均存活时间〉50d。结论CD8^＋T细胞在产生和利用IL-2时有很大的可塑性。CD4^＋T细胞存在时，CD8^＋T细胞能有效利用CD4^＋T细来源的IL-2进行分裂增殖，在缺乏CD4^＋T细胞时，则利用自身来源的IL-2进行分裂增殖；移植抗原特异性CD8^＋T细胞的效应功能完全依赖于IL-2，排斥反应由CD8^＋T细胞介导时，阻断IL-2／IL-2受体通路可诱导移植物长期存活。     

Activated Effector and Memory T Cells Contribute to Circulating sCD30: Potential Marker for Islet Allograft Rejection

T-cell activation up-regulates CD30 resulting in an increase in serum soluble CD30 (sCD30). CD4+ T cells, a major source for sCD30, play a significant role in the pathogenesis of rejection. In this study, sCD30 was measured pre- and posttransplant in mouse islet allograft models and human islet allograft recipients. sCD30 was measured by ELISA in diabetic C57BL/6, CD4Knockout (KO) and CD8KO islet allograft recipients. sCD30 increased significantly prior to rejection (1.8 ± 1 days) in 80% of allograft recipients. Sensitization with donor splenocytes, or a second graft, further increased sCD30 (282.5 ± 53.5 for the rejecting first graft vs. 374.6 ± 129 for the rejecting second graft) prior to rejection suggesting memory CD4+ T cells contribute to sCD30. CD4KO failed to reject islet allograft and did not demonstrate sCD30 increase. CD8KO showed elevated (227 ± 107) sCD30 (1 day) prior to rejection. High pretransplant sCD30 (>20 U/ml) correlated with poor outcome in human islet allograft recipients. Further, increase in sCD30 posttransplant preceded (3–4 months) loss of islet function. We conclude that sCD30 is released from activated CD4 T cells prior to islet allograft rejection and monitoring sCD30 can be a valuable adjunct in the follow-up of islet transplant recipients.     

CD8+ T cells are capable of rejecting pancreatic islet xenografts

BACKGROUND: In this study, the capacity of CD8+ T cells to act as a potential effector mechanism in pancreatic xenograft rejection was examined. METHODS: The fate of pancreatic islet xenografts was studied in mice deficient in MHC class II molecules and CD4+ T cells. Fetal pig pancreas (FPP) or Wistar rat islets (RI) were transplanted into nondiabetic or streptozotocin-induced diabetic I-A knock-out (CII K/O) mice. RESULTS: CII K/O mice were capable of rejecting both RI and FPP grafts. RI graft survival was not prolonged compared with wild type C57BL/6 controls. However, FPP grafts did survive longer in CII K/O recipients than in C57BL/J6 mice. Both RI and FPP graft rejection were CD8+ T-cell phenomena in CII K/O mice, as anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody prolonged graft survival, there were increased CD8+ T cells in the grafts and spleens of CII K/O recipients, and cell-mediated cytotoxicity was a CD8+ T-cell phenomenon associated with activation of the perforin/granzyme B system. By contrast, RI and FPP graft rejection was a CD4+ T cell-dependent phenomenon in wild type C57BL/6 mice with graft survival prolonged by anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. There were increased numbers of CD4+ T cells, and cell-mediated cytotoxicity was a CD4+ T-cell phenomenon associated with activation of the Fas/FasL lytic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that, in the absence of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells were capable of rejecting both rat and pig pancreatic islet xenografts.     

Dynamic changes in Th1, Th17, and FoxP3+ T cells in patients with acute cellular rejection after cardiac transplantation

Previously, studies suggest that CD4(+) effector T-cell subsets participate in allograft rejection. However, the dynamic changes and relative roles of these CD4(+) effector T-cell subsets, especially Th17 cells, have not been systemically examined in patients with acute rejection after cardiac transplantation. In this study, we have studied and compared these CD4(+) T-cell subsets in peripheral blood and endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) in patients with stable-graft and acute cellular rejection. We observed that the gene expressions including T-bet, IFN-γ, RORγt, IL-17, IL-23, and FoxP3, the functional marker of Th1, Th17, and FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells, were elevated in EMB samples from patients with acute graft rejection. Accordingly, the percentages of circulating Th1, Th17, and FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells were also significantly increased. The data suggest that Th1, Th17, and FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells are associated with acute graft rejection in patients with cardiac transplantation.     

Link Between Immune Cell Infiltration and Mitochondria-Induced Cardiomyocyte Death During Acute Cardiac Graft Rejection

Acute cardiac graft rejection (ACGR) is associated with cardiomyocyte apoptosis. We investigated the respective role of the Fas/FasL and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) pathways in cardiomyocyte apoptosis accompanying ACGR. Heterotopic cardiac transplantations were performed in 7-9-week old C57BL6 or C3H mice. Wild type or Fas-deficient (lpr) mice underwent syngeneic (GS) or allogeneic (GA) transplantation, and received either saline or NIM811, a specific inhibitor of the mPTP. At day 5, we assessed ACGR by histology, cardiomyocyte apoptosis by caspase-3 activity and cytochrome c release, Ca(2+)-induced mPTP opening by a potentiometric approach, and expression of Fas, FasL, TNFalpha, perforin, granzyme using RT-PCR. Myocardial infiltration of CD8(+) T lymphocytes was performed by immunohistochemistry. Allogenic transplantation increased infiltration of inflammatory cells, upregulated FasL, perforin, granzyme, and TNFalpha, favored Ca(2+)-induced mPTP opening and increased caspase-3 activity and cytochrome c release in WT grafts. NIM811, but not Fas-deficiency, significantly reduced all these effects. NIM811 also limited infiltration of CD8(+) into WT and lpr transplants. These data suggest that the mPTP pathway plays a major role in cardiomyocyte apoptosis associated with ACGR. Inhibition of mPTP opening may attenuate cardiomyocyte apoptosis either directly or indirectly via a limitation of CD8(+) T-cell activation.     

The roles of T cell subpopulations in allograft rejection

In principle, cell-mediated allograft rejection can be brought about by cytotoxic T cells or by a DTH-like reaction. The first part of this article reviews the relative importance of these two mechanisms in graft rejection and concludes that the bulk of evidence points to cytotoxic T cells as being of major importance. In the discussion an operational definition of DTH is adopted--namely a mechanism that mediates bystander killing and depends on the existence of a radiation-sensitive effector mechanism. The rejection of skin and organ allografts in mammals is T cell dependent and the demonstration that such rejection can occur in heavily-irradiated T cell reconstituted animals and in the absence of demonstrable bystander effects leads to the conclusion drawn. This is not to imply that concomitant DTH reactions may not augment the rejection process nor to deny the possibility that in special circumstances DTH reactions may play an essential part. In the second part of this article, the roles in graft rejection of CD4+ and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are considered. The classical collaborative interaction between class II-restricted CD4+ cells that play an inductive role, and class I restricted CD8+ cells that differentiate into cytotoxic effector cells, seems to be unnecessary in some allograft responses. Thus, not only can CD4+ T cells differentiate into class II-restricted cytotoxic T cells but CD8+ T cells, at least in some class I MHC-incompatible strain combinations, can develop into mature effector cells without an inductive signal from CD4+ T cells. This autonomy seems to be limited to MHC incompatibilities so that CD8+ cells alone are unable to mediate the rejection of minor-H incompatible grafts. For these latter types of grafts, CD4+ T cells can bring about graft rejection if multiple minor-H determinants are present, but for weak minor-H responses the classical collaborative scheme is necessary.     

New Insights in CD28-Independent Allograft Rejection

CD28 costimulatory blockade induces tolerance in most murine transplant models but fails to do so in stringent transplant models, such as skin transplantation. The precise immunological mechanisms of CD28-independent rejection remain to be fully defined. Using two novel mouse strains in which both CD28 and either CD4 or CD8 are knocked out (CD4(-/-)CD28(-/-) or CD8(-/-)CD28(-/-) mice), we examined mechanisms of CD28-independent CD4(+) or CD8(+) T-cell-mediated allograft rejection. CD4(-/-)CD28(-/-) and CD8(-/-)CD28(-/) deficient mice rejected fully allogeneic skin allografts at a tempo comparable with that in wild-type mice. Rejection proceeded despite significant reduction in alloreactive T-cell clone sizes suggesting the presence of a subset of T cells harnessing alternate CD28-independent costimulatory pathways. Blockade of CD40-CD154 and CD134-CD134L, but not ICOS-B7h pathways in combination significantly prolonged allograft survival in CD8(-/-)CD28(-/-) recipients and to a lesser extent in CD4(-/-)CD28(-/-) recipients. Prolongation in allograft survival was associated with reduced effector-memory T-cell generation, decreased allospecific Th1 cytokine generation and diminished alloreactive T-cell proliferation in vivo. In aggregate, the data identify these two pathways as critical mediators of CD28-independent rejection by CD4(+) and to a lesser extent CD8(+) T cells, and provide novel mechanistic insights into functions of novel T-cell co-stimulatory pathways in vivo.     

Lesions of T-Cell-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection in Mice Do Not Require Perforin or Granzymes A and B

Organ allograft rejection is strongly associated with the presence of alloreactive cytotoxic T cells but the role of cytotoxicity in the pathologic lesions is unclear. Previous studies showed that the principal lesions of kidney rejection - interstitial infiltration, tubulitis, and endothelial arteritis - are T-cell-dependent and antibody-independent. We studied the role of cytotoxic granule components perforin and granzymes A and B in the evolution of the T-cell-mediated lesions of mouse kidney transplant rejection. By real-time RT-PCR, allografts rejecting in wild-type hosts at days 5, 7, 21, and 42 showed massively elevated and persistent expression of perforin and granzymes A and B, but evolution of tubulitis and arteritis did not correlate with increasing granzyme or perforin expression. Allografts transplanted into hosts with disrupted genes for perforin or granzymes A and B showed no change in tubulitis, arteritis, or MHC induction. Thus the development of the histologic lesions diagnostic of T-cell-mediated kidney transplant rejection are associated with but not mediated by perforin or granzyme A or B. Together with previous graft survival studies, these results indicate that the granule-associated cytotoxic mechanisms of T cells are not the effectors of T-cell-mediated allograft rejection.