Paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

Background: Paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin are each active in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and with different modes of action. Hence, a phase II study combining these drugs were conducted.Patients and methods: Treatment was paclitaxel 110 mg/m² and cisplatin 60 mg/m² day 1 and 15, with gemcitabine 800 mg/m² day 1, 8, and 15, every four weeks. Patients had previously untreated NSCLC, measurable disease, age 18–70 years, performance status 2, and no brain metastases.Results: Among 49 patients, 6 (group 1) received chemotherapy as described above, while 43 patients (group 2) did not receive gemcitabine day 8. In group 1, all experienced grade 4 neutropenia and four achieved a partial response (67%). In group 2, neutropenia grade 4 occured in 58%, with one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic death. No other grade 4 toxicities occured, while grade 3 toxicity occured with respect to thrombocytopenia (9%), nausea/vomiting (12%), neurotoxicity (12%), and nephrotoxicity (7%). There were 3 complete and 20 partial responses (response rate 54%, 95% confidence limits 38%–69%), median response duration 29 weeks (range 10–66+), median time to progression 28 weeks (range 4–66+), median survival 46 weeks (4–89+) and one-year survival rate 42%.Conclusion: This regimen of paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin has neutropenia as dose limiting toxicity, but septicemic episodes were rare and toxic death did not occur. Other grade 4 toxicities than neutropenia did not occur. The regimen appears safe and with a noteworthy activity both in terms of response rate, time to progression, and survival.     

Phase I trial of paclitaxel and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with refractory solid tumors

Purpose: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine possess broad spectra of clinical activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and are differentially affected by mutations in cell-cycle regulatory proteins, such as bcl-2. This phase I trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of paclitaxel and gemcitabine when both drugs were given together on a once-every-two-week schedule in patients with solid tumors.Patients and methods: A total of 37 patients were treated at nine different dose levels ranging from paclitaxel 75–175 mg/m² administered over three hours followed by gemcitabine 1500–3500 mg/m² administered over 30–60 minutes. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in a stepwise manner in which the dose of one drug was escalated while the dose of the other drug was kept constant.Results: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at dose level 9: paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m² in the form of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for 5 days (one patient) and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGPT) (one patient). An analysis of delivered dose intensity (DI) over the first three cycles revealed that higher dosages of both drugs were delivered at dose level 7, paclitaxel 150 mg/m² and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m² dose level, than at the MTD, dose level 8, paclitaxel 150 mg/m² and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m². Partial responses were confirmed in two patients with transitional cell carcinoma (one of the bladder, one of the renal pelvis) and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary.Conclusions: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a promising drug combination that can be administered safely and repetitively on an every-other-week schedule. Using this drug administration schedule, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 150 mg/m² and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m².     

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a phase i study

Purpose: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the paclitaxel–gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis every 2 weeks: paclitaxel over a 1-h IV infusion and gemcitabine as a 30-min IV infusion immediately following paclitaxel. Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated at six different dose levels, ranging from paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,500–3,000 mg/m². A total of 198 cycles were administered (median 7, range 1–13). DLTs in the first two cycles were grade 4 neutropenia and myocardial ischemia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 150/2,000 mg/m², febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/2,500 mg/m², fatal pneumonitis, sudden death and grade 3 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/3,000 mg/m². The MTD was paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m². The average dose intensity at this dose level was 98%. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.97% - 53.47%). Overall median survival was 36 weeks (95% CI, 24-48). Conclusion: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine can be safely administered at a high dose intensity on an every-other-week schedule. The recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m².     

Phase I dose finding study evaluating the combination of bendamustine with weekly paclitaxel in patients with pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: RiTa trial

Purpose  The aim of the RiTa trial is to establish a feasible combination of bendamustine and paclitaxel in a weekly schedule in anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods  Starting dose of bendamustine was 50 mg/m2 and was stepwise increased by 10 mg/m2 up to 70 mg/m2. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 60 mg/m2 and was increased up to 90 mg/m2. There are five pre-defined dose levels with three patients per dose level (maximum six patients) and six patients in the last dose level according to the Goodman design. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as well as non-haematological toxicities ≥NCI-CTC grade 3 in the first cycle. Results  No dose-limiting toxicity up to 70 mg/m2 bendamustine and 90 mg/m² paclitaxel occurred during the first cycle. Over all cycles, the following severe haematological toxicities (grade 3 and 4) were documented: neutropenia five patients and anaemia one patient. Relevant grade 3 and 4 non-haematological toxicities over all cycles were fatigue two patients, dyspnoea one patient, infection four patients and bone pain in one patient. Five serious adverse events, but no therapy related death occurred. Five patients showed a complete or partial remission, six patients stable disease and six progressed during treatment. The median progression-free survival was 8 months. Conclusion  Treatment with weekly bendamustine and paclitaxel is a feasible and effective regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The recommended dose for forthcoming phase II study is 70 mg/m² bendamustine and 90 mg/m² paclitaxel. In part presented at the congress of the German Cancer Society on February 2008 in Berlin.     

Weekly paclitaxel in patients with CAP-resistant advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a series of four patients

We evaluated the feasibility of weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma who had failed treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP). We treated four patients with CAP-resistant recurrent or advanced endometrialcarcinoma with paclitaxel. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m²; infused over 1 h) was administered weekly for a maximum of 18 weeks, unless disease progression or intractable toxicity developed. A complete response was observed in onepatient and a partial response in two patients. Disease progression was found in one patient. Two patients developed grade 3 leukopenia or neutropenia. Neurotoxicity for all patients was within grade 1. Outpatient treatment with weekly paclitaxel was well-tolerated and feasible for patients with CAP-resistant recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma. Further trials to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel are warranted.     

Phase II study of biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: Korea Japan Collaborative Study Group Trial

BACKGROUND: Benefits of chemotherapy have generally been modest in gastric cancer, although those regimens developed more recently have produced higher response rates. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin is one such regimen and divided administration of paclitaxel has been suggested to be associated with lower neurological and hematologic toxicities and be able to achieve higher paclitaxel dose intensities than paclitaxel administration at 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. This study was undertaked to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination treatment in advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Twenty-five patients from Japan and Korea, 50 patients in total, were entered into this trial which was conducted from October 2004 to June 2005. Median age of the patients was 57 years (range: 26-78). Paclitaxel 140 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 was also administered on days 1 and 15 with standard hydration. A total of 278 courses of treatment (two treatment courses per cycle) were conducted for 50 patients. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two with a range of one to six. RESULTS: Nine of the 50 patients responded to the treatment, with an overall objective response rate of 18% (95% CI, 12-41), which included one complete response. Two patients were not evaluable and 14 patients had stable disease as best response. The median survival duration of the 50 patients was 333 days (range: 52-637+ days). The main toxicity was neutropenia. Significant toxicity (NCI-CTC grade 3 or 4) included neutropenia in 19 patients (38%), anorexia in four (8%), infection in three (6%), anemia in three (6%), and abdominal pain in three (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy showed modest activity in advanced gastric carcinoma with a favorable toxicity pattern.     

Phase II trial of low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel has shown promising activity in gastric cancer and has synergism with cisplatin. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose paclitaxel (145 mg/m(2)) plus cisplatin chemotherapy in metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer were enrolled. Paclitaxel 145 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 3 h, followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on Day 1 every 3 weeks in the outpatient setting. RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled, 17 (44%) had partial responses. Twelve (31%) had stable disease and eight (21%) progressive disease. Two patients (5%) were not evaluable because of early drop-out. The median time to progression was 4.7 months and the median overall survival was 12.1 months. The most common hematologic toxicity was anemia (41%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia developed in 14 and 3%, respectively. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were peripheral neuropathy (43%) and emesis (43%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included emesis (11%), peripheral neuropathy (3%), diarrhea (3%) and hepatotoxicity (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy was active and well-tolerated in chemotherapy-na?ve gastric cancer patients. This regimen seems to have comparable efficacy to previously reported higher-dose paclitaxel plus cisplatin-containing regimens and fewer toxicities.     

Phase I/II study of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Purpose: We performed a phase I/II study evaluating the combination ofpaclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients withadvanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to define a feasible andsafe combination regimen that could be recommended for future phase IIIstudies.Design: This study was a parallel two-arm, non-randomized, open trial. Ina first step, carboplatin was administered at a fixed dose of AUC 5 andpaclitaxel was escalated in 25 mg/m² steps starting at 135mg/m². Paclitaxel was given as a three-hour infusion.Carboplatin was administered on day 1 following paclitaxel in one study armand 24 hours after paclitaxel infusion on day 2 in the other study arm.Carboplatin was escalated to AUC 6 and AUC 7.5 after the MTD for paclitaxelhad been defined. Treatment was repeated every three weeks.Patients: Sixty-one patients with untreated histologically confirmedepithelial ovarian cancer were recruited of whom 59 were found eligible andevaluable for toxicity. Thirty-three patients with bidimensionally measurabledisease were evaluable for tumor response.Results: We could not detect any advantage of the two-day schedule comparedwith the more convenient one-day schedule. Dose limiting toxicities wereneutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity. Except for two patients,toxicity was acceptable and clinically managable. One patient died ofneutropenic sepsis and one further patient developed grade III peripheralneurotoxicity that did not resolve within two months after chemotherapy hadbeen terminated. Overall objective response rate was 70%. The MTD forpaclitaxel was 185 mg/m² and AUC 6 for carboplatin,respectively. Secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not allow further doseescalation and therefore is not generally recommended.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 185 mg/m² given as three-hourinfusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 is a feasible and safe regimen and canbe recommended for phase III trials. Observed response rates justify furtherevaluation of this combination. A randomized phase III trial comparing athree-hour infusion of paclitaxel 185 mg/m² combined witheither carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 75 mg/m² as first-linechemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer has recently been initiated by ourgroup.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of BNP7787, a novel chemoprotector in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

We conducted a phase I trial of BNP7787 (disodium 2,2??-dithio-bis-ethane sulfonate, Tavocept?), a novel chemoprotective and antitumor enhancing agent administered in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin. The primary aim was to determine a safe and potentially efficacious BNP7787 dose for preventing and mitigating paclitaxel- and cisplatin-induced toxicities and to evaluate for preliminary evidence of efficacy of treatment.

Patients and methods

Twenty-two patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received BNP7787 alone 1 week before co-administration of BNP7787 with paclitaxel followed by cisplatin. Twenty-one patients were treated with BNP7787 in escalating doses of 4.1?C41.0?g/m² concurrently with paclitaxel 175?mg/m² and cisplatin 75?mg/m² every 3?weeks.

Results

The appropriate dose was determined to be 18.4?g/m² of BNP7787 although no dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to 41.0?g/m². Mild intravenous site discomfort, thirst, and nausea were the most common toxicities. One patient developed grade 2 skin rash, which was severe enough to preclude further study treatment. The AUC_0-inf of the metabolite mesna was approximately 6.3% of the AUC_0-inf of BNP7787. Co-administration of paclitaxel and cisplatin did not appear to influence the pharmacokinetics of BNP7787 and mesna. The overall response rate was encouraging; 43% including 11 patients with prior chemotherapy.

Conclusions

The recommended dose for phase II/III studies is 18.4?mg/m² of BNP7787 in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin. Further studies are warranted to assess whether BNP7787 prevents and mitigates common and serious paclitaxel- and cisplatin-related side effects and enhances the efficacy of paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC patients.     

Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Radically Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study

BackgroundThe combination cisplatin/gemcitabine is one of the most active and well-tolerated regimens in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We undertook this pilot study to evaluate postoperative drug delivery and toxicity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with radically resected stage IB-III NSCLC.Patients and MethodsTwenty-two consecutive patients were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 planned courses. Most patients (50%) had pathologic stage IIIA disease; all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. The median age was 63 years (range, 56-73 years). Six out of 22 patients (27.3%) had undergone pneumonectomy.ResultsA total of 85 courses of chemotherapy were administered, and the median number of courses was 4 (range, 1-4 courses); twenty-one out of 22 patients received the planned 4 courses of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy caused grade 3 anemia in 1 patient, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in another patient, and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 4 patients; grade 3 vomiting was observed in 3 patients, and grade 3 anorexia and grade 3 asthenia were both observed in 1 patient. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median delivered dose intensities of cisplatin and gemcitabine were 24.3 mg/m²/week (97.2%) and 700.9 mg/m² weekly (87.5%), respectively.ConclusionThe combination of cisplatin/gemcitabine is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in the adjuvant setting. Future trials should better define the best strategy in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life between this combination and the standard regimen, cisplatin plus vinorelbine.     

Multicenter phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Purpose Since a weekly administration of paclitaxel has demonstrated a sustained efficacy and more favorable toxicity profile than a 3-weekly administration for various solid tumors, the present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of weekly paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and methods Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received intravenous paclitaxel 100 mg/m² plus cisplatin 35 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 based on a 3-week cycle. Results Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the current study. Two complete responses and 17 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 36.5%. At a median follow-up of 8.5 months, the median time to progression and median overall survival was 6.0 and 10.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in ten patients, while no grade 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia was observed. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was nausea (grade 1/2, 56.9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion A weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination was found to be well-tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Accordingly, this regimen can be regarded as an important first-line treatment option for advanced gastric cancer.     

Phase II study of paclitaxel (Genaxol) and cisplatin combination in treating Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of 3-h paclitaxel infusion (Genaxol) combined with cisplatin as the first line chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of the combination of paclitaxel (Genaxol) and cisplatin on Chinese patients. METHODS: Forty-five patients with histology confirmed NSCLC, who met the selection criteria were enrolled in this study between June 1999 and May 2000. They were all at an advanced stage, i.e. stage IIIB with pleural effusion, or stage IV. Paclitaxel (Genaxol) at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) were administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 45 eligible patients, one had a CR and 19 achieved a PR. The overall response was 44.4% (95% CI: 29.3-59.5%). Eleven (24.4%) patients were in stable disease. The median time to disease progression for all patients was 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.0-7.0 months). The median survival was 11.1 months (95% CI: 6.6-15.6 months), the 1-year survival probability was 46.5%. Major non-hematology toxicities were asthenia, paresthesias, nausea, and vomiting. Hematological toxicity results showed 18 (40%) patients experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia but there was no febrile neutropenia, three (6.6%) patients experienced Grade 3 anemia, and one (2.2%) patient experienced Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The combined paclitaxel and cisplatin regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of NSCLC but the quality of life is disappointed.     

Phase II study of oral S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of oral S-1 in combination with cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and materials

S-1 (50 mg/m²) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, with cisplatin (40 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks, for 2–4 cycles. Thoracic radiation therapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions five times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was the response rate, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival and safety.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 87.8% (98% CI: 77.8–97.8%). The median progression-free survival was 467 days (15.4 months), and the median survival time was 904 days (29.7 months). The overall survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 85.7% and 52.9%, respectively. Hematological toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (17%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (27%). No grade 3 febrile neutropenia was detected, and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were also mild. A grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage was observed in one patient.

Conclusions

The combination of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a promising treatment with a high efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.     

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy for recurrent or persistent squamous-cell cervical cancer

Purpose: The results of salvage chemotherapy for recurrent or persistent squamous-cell cervical cancer are unsatisfactory. Cisplatin and Ifosfamide are effective compounds in cervical cancer. Paclitaxel has recently been tested with promising results. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) for persistent/recurrent squamous-cell cervical carcinoma in a phase II trial.Patients and methods: Forty-five women were treated with the TIP regimen. Thirty-one had received prior irradiation. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 175 mg/m², ifosfamide at a dose of 5 g/m², and cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m² (50 mg/m² in irradiated patients) at three-week intervals.Results: We observed 15 clinical complete responses, 15 partial responses, 9 stable diseases and 6 progressions. The objective response rate was 67% (95% confidence interval: 51%–81%). Ten complete responders underwent subsequent surgery and seven had pathology-defined complete responses (two in irradiated areas). The response rate was 52% in irradiated and 75% in non-irradiated areas.The median survival for non-responders is 6 months, 9+ month for partial responders and 13+ for complete responders. The most relevant side effect was myelotoxicity, with 91% of patients experiencing grade 3–4. One woman had life-threatening toxic effects.Conclusions: This combination is highly effective for salvage treatment in non-irradiated patients. For irradiated women the response rate is higher than that observed with other regimens but further investigation is warranted. The toxicity is relevant but adequate hydration and prolonged infusion of ifosfamide make it acceptable.     

A dose-finding and pharmacodynamic study of bortezomib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib (B) when combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients received escalating doses of intravenous (IV) bortezomib (0.6–2 mg/m²) on days 2 and 9 and IV paclitaxel at 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was based on two end-points: not exceeding 80% 20S-proteasome inhibition (20-S PI) and the development of dose-limiting toxicity defined as grade 3 or greater non-hematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicities.

Results

Forty-five patients with advanced solid tumors and a median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (range 0–9), received 318 doses (median 5, range 1–34) of bortezomib and paclitaxel. Dose-related inhibition of 20-S PI was observed with a maximum inhibition of 70–80% at the MTD of 1.8 mg/m² of bortezomib. At the MTD (N = 9) the following toxicities were observed: grade 4 neutropenia without fever (n = 2) and cerebrovascular ischemia (n = 1); grade 3 neutropenia (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 2), nausea (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 1); grade 2 fatigue (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 4), and dyspnea (n = 2). There was one partial response in a patient with an eccrine porocarcinoma. Stabilization of disease was observed in 7 (16%) patients, 3 of whom had advanced pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

Sequential paclitaxel and bortezomib in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors resulted in acceptable toxicity and no evidence of interaction. The recommended phase II dose of bortezomib in combination with weekly paclitaxel was 1.8 mg/m².     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: Both paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) have a significant activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Weekly administration of P is active, is dose intense, and has a favorable toxicity profile. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly P and C in advanced-stage NSCLC, we initiated this phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC (III B with pleural effusion and stage IV). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m² intravenously (iv) over 1 h followed by carboplatin AUC 2 iv over 30 min. This treatment was administered weekly for 3 of every 4 wk until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Results: Of the 30 patients enrolled in the study, one patient did not meet the eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 29 patients, 6 did not complete at least two cycles of treatment and hence were not assessable for response. The overall response rate was 43.5% (10/23) (all partial responses). An additional 43.5% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 162 d and the median duration of response was 169 d. Overall survival at 1 yr on intent-to-treat analyses was 44% and median survival was 10.8 mo. We observed the following grade 3/4 toxicities: hypersensitivity to paclitaxel (13%), hypersensitivity to carboplatin (3%), neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (7%); 31% experienced grade 1 neuropathy and 17% experienced grade 2 neuropathy. Conclusions: We conclude that weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin is active and very well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Paclitaxel-cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer: a phase II study

Background. To date there have been four large randomized studies in Western countries examining the role of combining cisplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for ovarian cancer. A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced ovarian cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and toxicity of this regimen. Methods. Previously untreated patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer and a good performance status were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 180 mg/m² administered as a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m² i.v. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for at least four cycles. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not routinely used. Results. Among 26 eligible patients, there were 4 complete and 17 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.6% to 93.4%). One hundred and twenty-nine treatment cycles were administered to the 26 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 64 treatment cycles (50%) and in 23 patients (88%). Thrombocytopenia was less common. The most common nonhematologic toxicities included neurotoxicity, fatigue, arthralgia/myalgia, and nausea/emesis. Conclusion. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin is a highly active regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The toxicities of this regimen are well tolerated. Received: September 1, 1999 / Accepted: January 11, 2000     

A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of the biweekly administration of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of the paclitaxel, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin combination administered biweekly in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Patients received escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose: 100 mg/m²), gemcitabine (starting dose: 800 mg/m²) and oxaliplatin (starting dose: 50 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 in cycles of every 4 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (median age 65 years) with performance status 0–1 were treated on six dose escalation levels. Eleven patients (40.7%) were chemotherapy naïve, six (22.2%) had received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and ten (37.1%) 2 or more. The DLT level was reached at the doses of paclitaxel 110 mg/m², gemcitabine 1,150 mg/m² and LOHP 70 mg/m². The dose-limiting events were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. A median of 3 cycles per patient was administered. One complete and five partial responses were observed in patients with ovarian carcinoma, NSCLC, urothelial cancer, mesothelioma and cancer of unknown primary. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions were detected.

Conclusions

The recommended doses for future phase II studies of this combination are paclitaxel 110 mg/m², gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² every 2 weeks. The regimen is generally well tolerated and merits further evaluation.     

Clinical phase I study with one-hour paclitaxel infusion

Background: Paclitaxel (PAC) is one of the major anti-cancer drugs,effective in different tumors. Studies with 24-hour infusion with 135mg/m² and a three-hour infusion with 175 mg/m²showed a significant schedule-dependent toxicity. We evaluated a one-hourinfusion schedule within a phase I study to determine the dose limitingtoxicity (DLT), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the anti-cancerefficacy.Patients and methods: Patients with advanced malignant tumors weretreated within cohorts by one-hour infusional paclitaxel starting with 150mg/m² and stepwise escalation with 25 mg/m²increments. Therapy was repeated in three-week intervals. Cycles wererepeated until progression. Toxicity was closely monitored, anti-cancerefficacy was only evaluated in those patients who received at minimum twotreatment cycles.Results: Thirty-four patients entered the study (11 NSCLC, five SCLC,seven ovarian cancer, one cervix cancer, nine MBC, one HN cancer). The MTDwas PAC 250 mg/m². The DLT was central and peripheralneuropathy (WHO grade 3). Other significant toxicities were fatigue,myalgia/arthralgia and paraesthesia. No significant myelotoxicity wasobserved. Totally twentyone patients were evaluable for response. A partialresponse was observed in five (24%) patients (two NSCLC, two ovariancancer, one head and neck cancer). Three (14%) patients had stabledisease and in 13 (62%) patients progressive disease was observed.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 225 mg/m² on day 1 administered asone-hour infusion and repeated every three weeks can be given safely, featuredno relevant myelotoxicity, and is the recommended dose for phase II studies.     

Phase II study of weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy

Purpose We evaluated the tolerability and activity of the combination of weekly paclitaxel (PTX) and gemcitabine (GEM) in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods PTX (100 mg/m²) and GEM (1,000 mg/m²) were administered to patients with previous treated NSCLC on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Results A total of 40 patients (performance status 0/1/2, 7/27/6 pts) were enrolled. The response rate was 32.5% (95% confidence interval: 18.0–47.0%). The median survival time was 41.7 weeks (95% confidence interval: 28.5–54.7 weeks). The median time to disease progression was 19 weeks. Hematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4) observed included neutropenia in 60%, anemia in 15%, and thrombocytopenia in 12.5% of patients. Non-hematological toxicities were mild, with the exception of grade 3 diarrhea, pneumonitis, and rash in one patient each. There were no deaths due to toxicity. Conclusion The combination of weekly PTX and GEM is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active means of second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.