Esophageal dysfunction in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis and mixed connective tissue diseases

Esophageal motility was studied in 37 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS), 12 patients with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and 40 controls by the manometry method, using an open tube and continuous perfusion, and by radiological examination. Radiology was normal in 17 patients with PSS and five patients with MCTD, and abnormal in 15 patients with PSS and three with MCTD. The most frequent abnormality was slow transit time of barium. Manometry of the esophageal body was normal in 20 patients with PSS and six patients with MCTD, and abnormal in 17 patients with PSS and six with MCTD. Lack of contraction in the middle lower segments of the esophagus was the abnormality most frequently observed. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower among patients with PSS and MCTD than among the controls. Dysphagia was reported by ten patients with PSS and by six patients with MCTD. Radiology and manometry showed similar changes in PSS and MCTD, but dysphagia was more frequent among patients with MCTD.     

Scintigraphic assessment of oesophageal motility: what does it show and how reliable is it?

Computer analysed transit of a liquid bolus containing Tc99m (RT) was compared with manometry for the detection of oesophageal motility disorders in 151 patients with a variety of oesophageal symptoms. Manometry was abnormal in 99 of whom 44 had abnormal RT (sensitivity 44%); it was normal in 52 of whom 37 had normal RT (specificity 71%). The commonest manometric abnormalities were non-specific motility disorders characterised by abnormalities of peristaltic amplitude, waveform or baseline. Radionuclide transit was abnormal in only 32/77 (42%) of these. Achalasia, which is characterised by complete aperistalsis, was the least common diagnosis, but all five cases had abnormal RT. Simultaneous manometry and RT in 30 patients showed that the transit of a liquid bolus through the oesophagus is determined by the propagation rather than the form of the peristaltic contraction. Because non-specific motility disorders are common in clinical practice, RT is not a useful screening test for oesophageal dysmotility.     

Oesophageal motor and sensitivity abnormalities in non-obstructive dysphagia

OBJECTIVES : To evaluate oesophageal sensitivity to balloon distension in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD), and to determine its relationship with the motility pattern in response to food ingestion. PATIENTS AND METHODS : Twenty-one healthy volunteers and 19 consecutive patients complaining of NOD with normal standard manometry were included. An oesophageal sensitivity test was carried out before the manometry study with liquid and solid swallows. RESULTS : The median threshold to distension was 9 ml in control subjects and 5 ml in patients (P < 0.002). Dysphagia or odynophagia were reproduced in 15/19 (78.9%) patients during manometry with solid swallows only. The percentage of swallows with abnormal motility patterns was higher in patients than control subjects (P < 0.001). Compared with control values, sensitivity abnormality was defined by a distension threshold of < 6 ml. Motor abnormality was defined by > 19% of swallows occurring with one or more abnormal motor profiles. A total of 8/19 (42%) patients presented with the association of an abnormal sensitivity threshold and an abnormal motor pattern; 5/19 (26%) presented with isolated motor abnormalities; 4/19 (21%) patients presented with isolated abnormal sensitivity thresholds; and 2/19 (11%) patients presented without any abnormality. CONCLUSION : Manometry with solid swallows and oesophageal balloon distension are useful in characterizing NOD.     

Inconsistent association of esophageal symptoms, psychometric abnormalities and dysmotility

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the psychometric profiles of symptomatic patients with abnormal esophageal motility and symptomatic patients with normal manometric findings compared to asymptomatic controls. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with abnormal esophageal motility (7 achalasia, 8 diffuse esophageal spasm, 27 nutcracker esophagus, 37 hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, 21 hypotensive peristalsis, 13 failed peristalsis), 23 symptomatic controls with similar esophageal symptoms but normal manometry, and 27 asymptomatic controls were enrolled. Validated questionnaires assessing depression (Beck Depression Inventory), anxiety (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory or Trait Anxiety Inventory), and somatization (Psychosomatic Symptom Checklist) were administered to all subjects. RESULTS: Patients with both esophageal symptoms and either hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, nutcracker esophagus, or hypotensive contractions exhibited increased somatization, acute anxiety, or depression compared to asymptomatic controls but not compared to symptomatic controls. On the other hand, the psychometric profiles of patients with achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were strikingly normal. Among esophageal symptoms, chest pain was closely correlated with psychometric abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal symptoms of patients with abnormal esophageal motility may relate to the underlying psychological abnormalities, independent of manometric abnormalities.     

Oesophageal motility and lower oesophageal sphincter competence in progressive systemic sclerosis and localized scleroderma

Oesophageal motility and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) competence were investigated in 13 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) and in 16 patients with localized scleroderma (LS) by means of oesophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring of the distal oesophagus. Results were compared with those of a control group consisting of asymptomatic volunteers. Marked abnormalities in oesophageal motility and in acid exposure in the distal oesophagus were observed in PSS patients only. The mean resting pressure of the LOS was 10.1 +/- 1.5 mmHg in PSS, 21.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg in LS, and 23.8 +/- 2.0 mmHg in asymptomatic controls. Overall sphincter length was 24.1 +/- 3.4 mm in PSS, 31.1 +/- 1.6 mm in LS, and 39.0 +/- 2.0 mm in the control group. Spincter abdominal length was 12.1 +/- 2 mm, 15.4 +/- 1 mm, and 25.0 +/- 1 mm, respectively. The amplitude and duration of oesophageal waves were markedly reduced at 5, 10, and 15 cm above the LOS in PSS patients, with only the upper part of their gullet being spared. An abnormal acid exposure in the distal oesophagus was observed in 84.6% of PSS patients, whereas only 18.2% (2 of 11) of pH-tested LS patients had an abnormal 24-h pH test. These data show that a marked oesophageal involvement is present only in the systemic form of scleroderma. Oesophageal tests may be useful for a circumstantial diagnosis whenever the diagnosis of PSS is uncertain; however, their use does not seem to be justified as routine in patients with LS.     

Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients

Records from 910 patients referred to our clinical esophageal manometry laboratory for evaluation of noncardiac chest pain between January 1983 and December 1985 were reviewed and compared with records from 251 patients referred for dysphagia. Evaluation included baseline esophageal manometry, acid perfusion test, and edrophonium provocation. In the chest-pain group, 655 patients (72%) had normal esophageal motility and 255 (28%) had abnormal motility. Nutcracker esophagus was present in 48% of abnormal tracings, suggesting that it is a manometric marker for noncardiac chest pain. Of the total chest-pain group, 243 patients (27%) had their pain reproduced during provocative testing ("definite" esophageal pain); 192 patients (21%) had baseline manometric abnormalities but no pain during provocative testing ("probable" esophageal chest pain). The highest percentage of positive provocative responses (34%) occurred in patients with nutcracker esophagus on baseline manometry. Manometric abnormalities were statistically commoner (p less than 0.001) in patients with dysphagia, occurring in 53%. Achalasia (36%) and nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (38%) were the commonest abnormalities in this group, with nutcracker esophagus being infrequent (10%).     

Lower frequency of MMC is found in IBS subjects with abnormal lactulose breath test,suggesting bacterial overgrowth

We have recently described an association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and abnormal lactulose breath test, suggesting small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, the mechanism by which SIBO develops in IBS is unknown. In this case–control study we evaluate the role of small intestinal motility in subjects with IBS and SIBO. Small intestinal motility was studied in consecutive IBS subjects with SIBO on lactulose breath test. After fluoroscopic placement of an eight-channel water-perfused manometry catheter, 4-hr fasting recordings were obtained. Based on this, the number and duration of phase III was compared to 30 control subjects. To test whether there was a relationship between the motility abnormalities seen and the SIBO status of the patient at the time of the motility, subjects with a breath test within 5 days of the antroduodenal manometry were also compared. Sixty-eight subjects with IBS and SIBO were compared to controls. The number of phase III events was 0.7 ± 0.8 in IBS subjects and 2.2 ± 1.0 in controls (P < 0.000001). The duration of phase III was 305 ± 123 sec in IBS subjects and 428 ± 173 in controls (P < 0.001). Subjects whose SIBO was still present at the time of manometry had less frequent phase III events than subjects with eradicated overgrowth (P < 0.05). In conclusion, phase III is reduced in subjects with IBS and SIBO. Eradication of bacterial overgrowth seems to result in some normalization of motility.     

Clinical value of radionuclide oesophageal transit measurement.

We have reviewed our experience of 150 patients to assess the clinical value of radionuclide oesophageal transit measurements in relation to established oesophageal motility investigations. Achalasia and conditions characterised by incoordinate oesophageal motor activity were detected with equal frequency by manometry and radionuclide transit measurement. Radionuclide transit measurements identified abnormalities not detected by manometry in 18 patients, and manometry was abnormal in 26 patients with normal radionuclide studies, including all patients with nutcracker oesophagus and most with hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter. The overall sensitivity of radionuclide transit measurements in detecting oesophageal dysmotility was 75%, the sensitivity of manometry was 83% and that of conventional barium radiology 30%. We conclude that radionuclide transit measurement is a useful test for patients with suspected oesophageal motility disorders. Although it has limitations as a screening test, it provides additional information which complements oesophageal manometry.     

Manometry and radiology. Complementary studies in the assessment of esophageal motility disorders

The relationship between radiological and manometric findings in esophageal motility disorders is poorly understood. Therefore, 20 subjects (4 normal; 13 diffuse spasm; 3 other motility disorders) were studied using synchronous manometry and videofluoroscopy with alternate 5-ml and 10-ml barium swallows. A total of 181 swallows were analyzed. Concordance between manometry and fluoroscopy was excellent for individual swallows (98%), groups of 5 swallows (97%), and final diagnoses (90%). Contraction onset intervals less than 0.8 s apart over 5 cm (velocity greater than 6.25 cm/s) were critical in determining abnormal bolus transit (98% sensitivity and positive predictive value). Radiologically, segmental tertiary activity (complete luminal obliteration) was always associated with disrupted primary peristalsis, but nonsegmental tertiary activity was often seen with normal bolus transit and did not have a specific manometric correlate. Four patterns of interrupted peristalsis radiologically were found--segmental tertiary contractions, a generalized esophageal contraction, absence of motor activity, or discoordinated "to-and-fro" movement. Surprisingly, nearly complete barium clearance occurred by the first two mechanisms in two thirds of swallows. Thus, the authors believe radiology and manometry are both excellent studies for identifying abnormal esophageal peristalsis. In difficult cases, these tests give complementary information because radiology assesses bolus movement while manometry provides quantitative pressure data.     

Left ventricular function and oesophageal function in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms

Left ventricular function and oesophageal function (including oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring) were investigated and a psychiatric assessment carried out in 63 patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Twenty two (35%) patients had regional abnormalities of left ventricular wall motion (group A). Thirty six (57%) patients had an oesophageal abnormality (group B); 19 patients had gastro-oesophageal reflux and abnormal oesophageal motility, five had gastro-oesophageal reflux alone, and 12 had abnormal oesophageal motility alone. Only four had regional abnormalities of the left ventricular wall and abnormal oesophageal function. In nine (14%) patients left ventricular and oesophageal function were normal (group C). Psychiatric morbidity was significantly less common in group A than in groups B and C and was similar in group B and group C. A definite abnormality of left ventricular function, oesophageal function, or psychiatric morbidity is present in a high proportion of patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and in some instances this may lead to specific treatment. If quantitative assessment of left ventricular function is normal, oesophageal investigations should be performed. Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract may demonstrate oesophageal disease, but, if findings are normal, oesophageal manometry and ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring (including during treadmill exercise testing) should be carried out.     

Left ventricular function and oesophageal function in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms.

Left ventricular function and oesophageal function (including oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring) were investigated and a psychiatric assessment carried out in 63 patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. Twenty two (35%) patients had regional abnormalities of left ventricular wall motion (group A). Thirty six (57%) patients had an oesophageal abnormality (group B); 19 patients had gastro-oesophageal reflux and abnormal oesophageal motility, five had gastro-oesophageal reflux alone, and 12 had abnormal oesophageal motility alone. Only four had regional abnormalities of the left ventricular wall and abnormal oesophageal function. In nine (14%) patients left ventricular and oesophageal function were normal (group C). Psychiatric morbidity was significantly less common in group A than in groups B and C and was similar in group B and group C. A definite abnormality of left ventricular function, oesophageal function, or psychiatric morbidity is present in a high proportion of patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and in some instances this may lead to specific treatment. If quantitative assessment of left ventricular function is normal, oesophageal investigations should be performed. Endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract may demonstrate oesophageal disease, but, if findings are normal, oesophageal manometry and ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring (including during treadmill exercise testing) should be carried out.     

A Comparison of Esophageal Motility in Response to Bread Swallows and Water Swallows

Studies of esophageal manometry during eating have demonstrated abnormal motility in patients with dysphagia in whom standard water-swallow manometry was normal. However, there have been few concurrent motility studies making a direct comparison of food swallows with water swallows. This paper presents the results of such a study in 20 healthy volunteers. A comparison of bread swallows with water swallows revealed that hoth peristaltic amplitude in the proximal esophagus and peristaltic duration throughout the esophagus were significantly increased ( p < 0.05). Peristaltic propagation velocity was significantly decreased in the proximal and mid-esophagus ( p < 0.05). Percentages of nonconducted and nonperistaltic contractions were significantly increased ( p < 0.05–0.001) during bread-swallow manometry. Therefore, the response of the normal esophagus to food has been shown to he different from its response to water swallows. In particular, the high percentage of nonpropagated swallows in normal subjects when eating indicates that the results of food manometry in patients with dysphagia must include wider limits of normality.     

Comparison of esophageal manometry,provocative testing,and ambulatory monitoring in patients with unexplained chest pain

Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitors are being developed to evaluate noncardiac chest pain. This new technology needs comparison with conventional esophageal tests before determining which studies are most useful in diagnosing and treating esophageal chest pain. Therefore, we studied 45 patients with esophageal manometry, acid perfusion and edrophonium tests, and 24 hr pH and pressure monitoring. Manometry was abnormal in 20 patients (44%) with nutcracker esophagus, the most common motility disorder. Fifteen (33%) had positive acid perfusion test and 24 (55%) positive edrophonium test. During ambulatory monitoring, all patients experienced chest pain with a total of 202 individual events: 32 events (15%) secondary to acid reflux, 15 (7%) secondary to motility abnormalities, 7 (3%) to both pH and pressure changes, and 149 events (74%) occurred in the absence of any abnormal pH or motility changes. Patients with normal manometry were significantly (P less than 0.01) more likely to have acid reflux chest pain events than did nutcracker patients, who had an equal frequency of pH and motility events. A positive acid perfusion test was significantly associated with abnormal pressure events (P = 0.02; odds ratio 5.95), while a positive edrophonium test more likely predicted acid reflux chest pain during 24-hr monitoring (P = 0.007; odds ratio 7.25). Therefore, abnormal manometry and positive provocative tests point to the esophagus as the likely source of chest pain. However, ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring are required to accurately define the relationship between chest pain and acid reflux or motility disorders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Esophageal manometric and radiologic findings in asymptomatic subjects with Chagas' disease

We studied 68 asymptomatic subjects (63 men) aged 19-67 years (median age, 41.5 years), who were candidates to donate blood at the University Hospital of the School of Medicine of Ribeir?o Preto whose serologic examination result for Chagas' disease was positive. These individuals underwent a resting electrocardiogram (ECG). chest and esophageal radiographic examinations, and esophageal manometry. Thirty-three subjects (49%) had normal esophageal and cardiac examinations. Twenty-eight (41%) had an abnormal ECG and/or abnormal chest radiograph, 18 of them with normal findings on both esophageal manometry and radiograph. Two of the other 10 subjects had normal results on manometry and an abnormal esophageal radiograph. Eight of these subjects had manometric abnormalities which included decreased contraction amplitude (n = 4), failed lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (n = 1), and simultaneous contractions (n = 3). Esophageal radiographic examination showed no alteration in five cases and esophageal retention in three. Only seven subjects (10%) exhibited exclusive esophageal manifestations, that is, simultaneous contractions (n = 5), simultaneous contractions with failed LES relaxation (n = 1), and esophageal retention (n = 1). Of the total group of 68 subjects, 17 (25%) had some esophageal abnormality observed on manometry (14 cases [21%]) and on radiographic examination (6 cases [9%]). We conclude that asymptomatic subjects with Chagas' disease may have cardiac and esophageal alterations which may be detectable by the examinations regularly used to study heart and esophagus.     

Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive Dysphagia

BACKGROUND: Non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD) often poses diagnostic problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the addition of multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) recording to esophageal manometry in the work-up of patients with NOD. METHODS: A total of 40 consecutive patients with NOD underwent combined esophageal MII recording and perfusion manometry. Ten liquid and 10 viscous boluses were tested in each patient. Values for bolus presence time (BPT) at each of the four recording sites and total bolus transit time (TBTT) were calculated. Bolus transit (BT) was considered to be normal when BPT at all sites and TBTT were within the normal limits defined in 42 healthy subjects. Patients were judged to have normal transit if >or=80% of liquid and >or=70% of viscous swallows showed normal transit. RESULTS: The following manometric diagnoses were made: normal motility (20), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (13), diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) (4), and achalasia (3). Abnormal transit for liquid and/or viscous boluses was found in 35.3% of patients with normal motility, in 66.7% of DES patients, and in 100% of achalasia patients. In patients with achalasia quantification of BT was often made impossible by low initial impedance baseline. Two IEM patients (15.4%) showed normal liquid and viscous transit. Swallows showing normal transit had significantly longer duration of LES relaxation in patients with normal manometry and IEM (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MII recording identifies esophageal function abnormalities in NOD patients with normal manometry, IEM, and DES. The MII technique seems to be less suitable for the most severe end of the dysphagia spectrum like achalasia.     

Esophageal motility disorders

Esophageal motility abnormalities are usually diagnosed when esophageal manometry is performed in patients with unexplained non-cardiac chest pain, non obstructive dysphagia or as a part of the preoperative evaluation for surgery of gastroesophageal reflux. Classification of these abnormalities has been a subject of controversy. These esophageal contraction abnormalities can be separated manometrically from the motor pattern seen in normal subjects, however, their clinical relevance is still unclear and debated. Many patients demonstrate motility abnormalities in the manometry laboratories, but may lack correlation with their presenting symptoms. Medical treatment can decrease symptoms particularly chest pain or acid reflux but there is no significant changes in the manometric patterns. Such motor abnormalities may not reflect a true disease state, but they could be markers of other abnormalities and they can modify the initial manometric findings in time.     

Oesophageal function in patients with angina pectoris: a comparison of patients with normal coronary angiograms and patients with coronary artery disease

Oesophageal function was assessed in 52 patients with angina pectoris whose coronary angiograms were completely normal and in 21 patients with angina pectoris who had significant coronary artery disease. During a standard oesophageal manometric study, abnormalities were found in 23 (44%) patients with normal coronary angiograms but in only 2 (10%) patients with coronary artery disease (p less than 0.01). Twenty-four (46%) patients with normal coronary angiograms were found to have gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring. Of the 52 patients with normal coronary angiograms, 19 (37%) had gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and abnormal oesophageal motility, 5 (10%) had gastro-oesophageal reflux disease alone, and 7 (13%) had oesophageal motility disorder alone. The use of provocation procedures, including intravenous edrophonium during oesophageal manometry and treadmill exercise testing during pH monitoring, enabled the oesophageal abnormality to be demonstrated simultaneously with chest pain in 25 of these 31 patients. Typical angina pectoris, coincident with abnormal oesophageal motility, was precipitated in a subgroup of patients who had been shown to have oesophageal manometric abnormalities and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease by the infusion of hydrochloric acid into the oesophagus; both the chest pain and manometric abnormality resolved following the oral administration of antacid.     

Effect of cold pressor test and a high-chilli diet on rectosigmoid motility in irritable bowel syndrome.

AIM: Visceral hypersensitivity characterizes the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated the effect of a cold pressor test (CPT)--hand immersion in ice water for 1 minute, which evokes a sympathetic response--on rectosigmoid motility in patients with IBS and normal volunteers. Since many Indian patients with IBS complain of worsening of symptoms following a spicy meal, we also evaluated whether a high-chilli diet affects symptoms or changes rectosigmoid motility. METHODS: Fifteen men with IBS and 13 normal volunteers (all men) were studied. Baseline rectosigmoid manometry was done for 2 h, i.e., 1 h pre- and 1 h post-CPT. The subjects were then kept in hospital on a regular diet (approximately 5 g chilli daily) for 3 days, following which symptoms were reassessed and manometry repeated for 1 h. This was followed by a high-chilli diet (approximately 15 g/day) for 3 days, after which symptoms were reassessed and manometry repeated for 1 h. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline study in the pre-CPT period between patients and control subjects. CPT did not change rectosigmoid motility in either group. IBS patients had varied effect on symptoms but no change in rectosigmoid motility after the high-chilli diet. In the normal volunteers, there was increased activity in the low rectum after the high-chilli diet. CONCLUSIONS: Cold pressor test does not affect rectosigmoid motility in patients with IBS or normal subjects. A high-chilli diet has varied effect on symptoms in patients with IBS and does not affect rectosigmoid motility.     

Esophageal dysfunction and chest pain in patients with mitral valve prolapse: a prospective study utilizing provocative testing during esophageal manometry

PURPOSE: The cause of chest discomfort in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) remains unknown. Our aim was to determine prospectively the incidence of esophageal disorders and abnormal responses to edrophonium chloride and esophageal acid infusions in patients with MVP and troublesome non-ischemic chest pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After coronary artery disease was excluded, 20 patients with MVP and chest pain underwent esophageal manometry and provocative testing with edrophonium chloride and acid infusion. Seven patients with MVP but without chest pain served as control subjects; they also underwent esophageal manometry with provocative testing. RESULTS: Esophageal manometry revealed esophageal disorders in 16 patients: diffuse esophageal spasm in 14 patients, nutcracker esophagus in one, and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter in one. Esophageal motility was normal in four patients. Injection of edrophonium and acid infusion tests evoked typical chest discomfort in three of 18 and five of 19 patients, respectively. In six of seven control subjects with MVP but with no chest discomfort, esophageal motility was normal and provocative testing did not produce chest discomfort (p less than 0.05 versus results in patients). CONCLUSION: Esophageal disorders were common and may account for chest discomfort in certain patients with MVP and persistent chest pain syndromes.     

Colonic transit time of radiopaque markers and rectoanal manometry in patients complaining of constipation

Transit time, rectoanal manometry, and symptoms were studied in 61 patients complaining of constipation. A slow transit, in the colonic area of most of the patients, was found in 49. Rectoanal manometry was abnormal in 40. Both examinations were abnormal in 32 patients, colonic transit only in 17, and manometry only in eight. Finally, both examinations were normal in only four subjects. A transit delay was always associated with less than three stools per week, and straining at stool was constant when rectoanal manometric disturbances were shown. Objective abnormalities appear common in patients complaining of constipation and, correlated with symptoms, suggest that clinical study in constipation could be of more value than usually is believed.