Identification of occult breast lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging with targeted ultrasound: A prospective study

Objective

To verify the capacity of targeted ultrasound (US) to identify additional lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but occult to initial mammography, US and clinical examinations.

Methods

This prospective study included 68 additional relevant breast lesions identified on MRI of 49 patients. As an inclusion criterion, breast US and mammography were required and performed up to six months before MRI. These lesions were then subjected to targeted “second-look” US up to 2 weeks after MRI, performed by one or two radiologists with expertise on breast imaging. Lesions were evaluated according to the established Breast Imaging Report and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon.

Results

Targeted US identified 46/68 (67.6%) lesions revealed by MRI. No significant associations were observed between US identification and the type of lesion, dimensions, morphological characteristics and enhancement pattern according to MRI findings. Targeted US identified 100% of BI-RADS category 5 lesions, 90% of category 4 lesions, and just over 50% of category 3 lesions (p < 0.05). There was significant agreement (p < 0.001) between MRI and US BI-RADS classification for all three categories.

Conclusion

Targeted US can identify a large proportion of the lesions detected by breast MRI, especially those at high risk of malignancy, when performed by a professional with experience in both breast US and MRI.     

Assessment of breast lesions using BI-RADS US lexicon in mammographically dense breasts (ACR categories 3 and 4) with histopathological correlation

Purpose

To assess the role of ultrasonography in detection, and categorization of breast lesions in patients with mammographically dense breasts with the use of the BI-RADS US lexicon.

Patients and methods

This study included 60 female patients (age range from 20 to 80 years, mean 38.3 ± 11.9) complaining of mastalgia, breast lump or nipple discharge with mammographically dense breast tissue. Breast ultrasound was performed to all patients with a 12-MHz linear-array transducer. Sonographic findings of the breast lesions were described and categorized according to the BI-RADS US assessment categories. Biopsy procedures were performed for the sonographically detected breast lesions with histopathological examination of the biopsied tissue.

Results

The main complaint was palpable breast mass encountered in 25 patients, 12 of mastalgia, 4 of nipple discharge, 12 patients were on screening and 7 on follow up. 36 patients were categorized as ACR 3 and 24 ACR 4 regarding the density of their breasts in mammography. Mammography revealed no abnormalities in 31 patients and abnormal in 29 patients, the commonest mammographic finding was breast mass, detected in 19 patients. Ultrasound detected breast lesions in 56 (93.3%) out of 60 patients. BI-RADS US category 2 was the most common category representing 36.7%. Ultrasonography had a diagnostic reliability for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions (p = 0.869) in mammographically dense breasts while mammography was diagnostically unreliable (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Ultrasound is a mandatory adjunct to mammography in detection and characterization of breast lesions in mammographically dense breasts.     

Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results

Objectives

Handheld breast ultrasound (HHUS) lacks standardization and reproducibility. The automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) could overcome this limitation. To analyze the interobserver reliability of ABVS and the agreement with HHUS, mammography and pathology is the aim of this study.

Methods

All 42 study participants (=84 breasts) received an ABVS examination in addition to the conventional breast diagnostic work-up. 25 breasts (30%) showed at least one lesion. The scans were interpreted by six breast diagnostic specialists blinded to results of breast imaging and medical history. 32 lesions received histological work-up: 20 cancers were detected. We used kappa statistics to interpret agreement between examiners and diagnostic instruments.

Results

On the basis of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification of the 84 breasts an agreement (defined as ≥4 of 6 examiners) was achieved in 63 cases (75%) (mk = 0.35) and even improved when dichotomizing the interpretation in benign (BI-RADS 1, 2) and suspicious (BI-RADS 4, 5) to 98% (mk = 0.52). Agreement of ABVS examination to HHUS, mammography and pathology was fair to substantial depending on the specific analysis.

Conclusions

The development of an ABVS seems to be a promising diagnostic method with a good interobserver reliability, as well as a comparable good test criteria as HHUS.     

Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?

Objectives

To evaluate the additive value of ultrasound strain elastography (USE) to BI-RADS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast small lesions.

Methods

Breast masses (≤2 cm) with histological diagnosis examined by ultrasonography and USE in our department from April 2004 to December 2009 were reviewed. Conventional B-mode ultrasound findings were classified according to the BI-RADS classification. USE findings were classified according to the 5-point scale. Histological diagnosis was used as the reference standard.

Results

401 (246 benign (61.3%), 155 malignant (38.7%)) from 370 consecutive patients were included in the study. Sensitivity and specificity were 90.3%, 68.3% for BI-RADS; 72.3%, 91.9% for USE. The sensitivity of BI-RADS was better than that of USE (P < 0.05), while the specificity of USE was better than that of BI-RADS (P < 0.05). A revised BI-RADS combined with USE results was proposed in this study. Sensitivity and specificity were 83.9% and 87.8% for revised BI-RADS. The diagnostic performance of revised BI-RADS was better than BI-RADS (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

USE could give BI-RADS some help in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast small lesions. The addition of elastography to BI-RADS could improve the diagnostic performance in <2 cm lesions.     

Real-time MRI navigated US: Role in diagnosis and guided biopsy of incidental breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes detected on breast MRI but not on second look US

Objectives

To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of real-time ultrasound combined with supine-MRI using volume navigation technique (RtMR-US) in diagnosis and biopsy of incidental breast lesions (ILSM) and axillary lymph nodes (LNSM) suspicious of malignancy on contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI).

Materials and methods

Five hundred and seventy-seven women were examined using breast CE-MRI. Those with incidental breast lesions not identified after second-look ultrasound (US) were recruited for RtMR-US. Biopsy was performed in ILSM. Breast lesions were categorized with BI-RADS system and Fisher’ exact test. Axillary lymph nodes morphology was described. To assess efficacy of RtMR-US, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, detection rate and Kappa index of conventional-US and RtMR-US were calculated.

Results

Forty-three lesions were detected on CE-MRI before navigation. Eighteen were carcinomas and 25 ILSM. Of these, 21 underwent a RtMR-US. Detection rate on RtMR-US (90.7%) was higher than on conventional-US (43%) (p < 0.001). Agreement between both techniques was low (k = 0.138). Twenty ILSM and 2 LNSM were biopsied. Sixty-five percent were benign (100% of BI-RADS3 and 56% of BI-RADS4-5). Diagnostic performance of RtMR-US identifying malignant nodules for overall lesions and for the subgroup of ILSM was respectively: sensitivity 96.3% and 100%, specificity 18.8% and 30.7%, positive predictive value 66.7% and 43.7%, negative predictive value 75% and 100%. In addition RtMR-US enabled biopsy of 2 metastatic lymph nodes.

Conclusions

Real time-US with supine-MRI using a volume navigation technique increases the detection of ILSM. RtMR-US may be used to detect occult breast carcinomas and to assess cancer extension, preventing unnecessary MRI-guided biopsies and sentinel lymph node biopsies. Incidental lesions BI-RADS 3 non-detected on conventional-US are probably benign.     

Can diffusion weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant solid or predominantly solid gynecological adnexal masses?

Objective

To determine the benefit of DWI in diagnosis of benign and malignant solid or predominantly solid gynecological adnexal or ovarian masses.

Material and Methods

This study is carried out on 23 patients with histologically proven solid or predominantly solid adnexal or ovarian masses out of which 5 cases (21.8%) have benign and 18 cases (78.2%) have malignant neoplasms. Among these 19 cases (82.6%) have unilateral disease and 4 cases (17.4%) have bilateral disease which was metastatic ovarian carcinoma.

Result

On DWI, high signal intensity is noted in malignant lesion more frequently than in benign lesion. (P < 0.001) in adnexal lesions, while in ovarian lesions (P = 0.001).The differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal lesions revealed no significant difference in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (P = 0.22).

Conclusion

DWI is a helpful tool in differentiation between predominantly solid and solid benign and malignant adnexal lesions because there is an increased frequency of higher signal intensity (diffusion restriction) in malignant lesions.     

Elastography ultrasound and questionable breast lesions: Does it count?

Objective

To check possible additional value of using elastography ultrasound in the specification of questionable breast lesions.

Subjects and methods

Questionable breast lesions on gray scale ultrasound examination had been further evaluated by elastography ultrasound in 97 cases with median age of 42 years. The studied lesions were pathologically proven (58 benign and 39 malignant) using true cut tissue/surgical excision biopsy that was considered the gold standard of reference.

Results

Conventional ultrasound categorization before biopsy included: category 3 (probably benign) in 42.3% (n = 41), category 4a (low suspicion of malignancy) in 13.4% (n = 13), category 4b (intermediate suspicion of malignancy) in 16.5% (n = 16) and category 4c (moderate suspicion of malignancy) in 27.8% (n = 27). We had evaluated elastography ultrasound regarding elastography strain scoring and quantitative strain ratio.Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89.7%, 86.2% and 87.6% for conventional ultrasound, 92.3%, 74.1% and 81.4% for elastogram 5-point scoring method and 87.1%, 89.6% and 88.6% for the calculated strain ratios respectively in the assessment of the examined breast lesions.

Conclusion

Ultrasound elastography, using both qualitative and quantitative methods can improve the performance of conventional B-mode ultrasound and enhance its specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of questionable (BI-RADS categories 3 and 4) breast lesions.     

Is Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With “Possible Invasion” More Predictive of Invasive Carcinoma Than Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

Objectives

To compare the underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) vs DCIS with “possible invasion” at breast biopsy and to determine if any factors related to clinical indication, imaging abnormality, biopsy, or DCIS-grade affected the likelihood of underestimation.

Methods

Of 3836 consecutive lesions that were biopsied by using a 14-gauge needle, 117 lesions revealed DCIS. Surgical pathology results of invasive carcinoma were compared with needle biopsy results of DCIS or DCIS with possible invasion. Clinical indication, imaging abnormality, biopsy guidance modality, sample number, and histologic grade were recorded. Yates corrected χ² and Fisher exact tests were used to determine differences between groups.

Results

A total of 101 lesions were DCIS and 16 were DCIS with possible invasion at biopsy. Thirty-six of 117 lesions (31%) revealed invasive carcinoma at resection pathology. Invasive carcinoma was present more often when DCIS with possible invasion was diagnosed compared with pure DCIS (7/16 [44%] vs 29/101 [29%], P = .36). No factor, including clinical indication, imaging abnormality, biopsy guidance method, sample number, or grade, was found to significantly affect the likelihood of underestimation for lesions diagnosed as DCIS vs DCIS with “possible invasion.” The likelihood of pure DCIS underestimation significantly increased when lesions were high grade compared with either intermediate or low grade (18/44 [41%] vs 9/44 [21%] vs 2/10 [20%], P = .03).

Conclusion

For lesions biopsied by using a 14-gauge needle, there is a trend towards underestimation of the presence of invasive carcinoma when pathology reveals DCIS with possible invasion compared with pure DCIS. High-grade DCIS was significantly more likely to be underestimated.     

Breast MRI of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: Sensitivity of diagnosis and influence of lesion characteristics

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity of breast MRI in the detection of pure DCIS and to analyze the influence of lesion type and nuclear grade.

Methods

58 consecutive patients with pathologically proven pure DCIS and preoperatively performed breast MRI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Sensitivities in the detection of DCIS were calculated for MRI and mammography (Mx). Influence of MRI lesion type and nuclear grading on DCIS diagnosis was evaluated.

Results

MRI detected pure DCIS with a sensitivity of 79.3%. The sensitivity of Mx was lower (69%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.345). 46.2% of the DCIS presented as enhancing mass and 53.8% as non-mass-like enhancement (NMLE). None of the masses but 21.4% (n = 6) of the NMLE were underestimated as probably benign (BI-RADS^® 3). MRI measured lesion sizes showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.74) with histopathologically measured lesion sizes. MRI detection rate of DCIS decreased significantly (p = 0.0458) with increasing nuclear grade. Calculated sensitivities were 100% for low-grade DCIS, 84.6% for intermediate-grade DCIS, and 66.7% for high-grade DCIS.

Conclusions

In this study MRI could detect pure DCIS more sensitively than Mx. Despite of missing statistically significance preoperative MRI seems to be helpful in patients with DCIS who are eligible for breast conservation. This applies in particular to patients with non-high-grade DCIS because those were significantly more often positive on MRI and significantly more often negative on Mx. Misinterpretation occurs especially in cases of NMLE and high-grade DCIS and therefore a correlation with Mx is also recommended.     

Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: Ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma

Objectives

The aim of this study was to contribute to the standardization of the numeric positive enhancement integral (PEI) values in breast parenchyma, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and to evaluate the significance of the difference in PEI values between IDC and parenchyma, DCIS and parenchyma and IDC and DCIS.

Materials and Methods

In the prospective trial, we analyzed the dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of 60 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed unilateral DCIS (n = 30) and IDC (n = 30) and defined the PEI values (range; mean ± SD) for the lesions and the breast parenchyma. Tumor-to-non-tumor (T/NT) ratios were calculated for DCIS and IDC and compared. PEI color maps (PEICM) were created. The differences in PEI values between IDC and parenchyma and between DCIS and parenchyma were tested according to t-test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the differences between the mean PEI values of parenchyma, DCIS and IDC.

Results

IDC showed highly statistically different PEI numeric values compared to breast parenchyma (748.7 ± 32.2 vs. 74.6 ± 17.0; p < 0.0001). The same applied to the differences in the group of patients with DCIS (428.0 ± 25.0 vs. 66.0 ± 10.6; p < 0.0001). The difference between IDC, DCIS and parenchyma were also considered highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and so were the T/NT ratios for IDC and DCIS (10.1 ± 2.4 vs. 6.6 ± 1.4; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

PEI numeric values may contribute to differentiation between invasive and in situ breast carcinoma.     

Underestimation of invasive lesions in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast diagnosed by ultrasound-guided biopsy: A comparison between patients with and without HER2/neu overexpression

Purpose

To determine the rate of underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed at imaging-guided biopsy and to analyze its association with HER2/neu oncogene, an important biomarker in assessing the tumour aggressiveness and guiding hormone therapy for breast cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients with DCIS diagnosed by imaging-guided core needle biopsy between January 2008 and March 2013. All of these patients received surgical excision, and in 25, the diagnosis was upgraded to invasive breast cancer. In this study, we examined the ultrasound, mammographic features and histopathological results for each patient, and compared these parameters between those with and without HER2/neu overexpression.

Results

Of the 162 DCIS lesions, 110 (67.9%) overexpressed HER2/neu. Nineteen patients with HER2/neu overexpressing DCIS (n = 19/110, 17.3%) were upgraded after surgery to a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. In this group, the upgrade rate was highest in patients with a dilated mammary duct pattern (42.1%, n = 8/19, p = 0.02) and the presence of abnormal axillary nodes (40.0%, n = 12/30, p < 0.01) at ultrasound and was significantly associated with comedo tumour type on pathology.

Conclusions

Biopsy may underestimate the invasive component in DCIS patients. Sonographic findings of dilated mammary ducts and presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes may help predicting the invasive components and possibly driving more targeted biopsy procedures.     

Outcome of breast lesions detected at screening ultrasonography

Objective

To assess the final outcome of breast lesions detected during screening ultrasonography (US) and categorized by BI-RADS final assessment.

Materials and methods

During a 1-year period, 3817 consecutive asymptomatic women with negative findings at both clinical breast examinations and mammography underwent bilateral whole breast US and BI-RADS categories were provided for US-detected breast lesions. The reference standard was a combination of histology and US follow-up (≥12 months), and the final outcomes of 1192 US-detected lesions were analyzed.

Results

Of 904 category 2 lesions, 890 remained stable for 12–60 months. Biopsies of 14 lesions revealed no malignancies (NPV = 100%). Of 247 category 3 lesions, 232 remained stable for 12–60 months. Biopsies of 15 lesions revealed 2 malignancies, which were diagnosed within 6 months of the index examination and were node negative (NPV = 99.2%). Of 41 category 4 lesions, biopsies of 38 lesions revealed 5 malignancies (PPV = 12.2%), and 3 remained stable for 37–51 months. No US-detected lesion was classified as category 5.

Conclusion

The rates of malignancy for US-detected BI-RADS categories 2, 3, and 4 lesions were 0%, 0.8%, and 12.2%, respectively. The final assessment of US BI-RADS categorization showed it to be an appropriate predictor of malignancy for screening US-detected breast lesions.     

Characterization of the enhancing lesions on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with interstitial mammoplasty

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to categorize the morphologic and kinetic features of enhancing lesions in breasts with interstitial mammoplasty using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and to assess factors predictive of breast cancer.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 21 enhancing lesions in 19 patients with interstitial mammoplasty, who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy or an operation in our hospital from September 2008 to July 2012. These lesions were sorted by morphological and kinetic features and final assessment category according to the BI-RADS lexicon.

Results

Nine cases were confirmed to be ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 2) and invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 7), and the remaining 12 cases were fibrocystic disease (n = 2), fibroadenoma (n = 2), fat necrosis (n = 1), foreign body granuloma (n = 3) and silicone mastitis (n = 1).Common features of malignancy included irregular shape (50.0%), spiculated margins (75.0%), heterogeneous enhancement (50.0%) and type III kinetic pattern (87.5%). The correlations of margins and kinetic curve pattern with benignity and malignancy approached statistical significance (p = 0.02, respectively). We found no correlation for shape (p = 0.33) or internal enhancement (p = 0.42) between lesion types. The malignancy rate of enhancing lesions was 42.8% (9/21). The sensitivity and specificity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were 100% and 16.67%, respectively. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging were 47.38%, 100% and 52.38%. Overall inter-observer agreement for the kinetic curve pattern was good (κ = 0.67). Moderate agreement was seen in describing the shape, margin, enhancement and assessing the final category (κ = 0.59, 0.46, 0.58 and 0.49, respectively).

Conclusion

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging had a high sensitivity, negative predictive value for the prediction of breast cancer but a low specificity due to features of foreign body-related lesions that mimicked malignant lesions. The significant predictive factors for malignancy were margins, kinetic curve pattern and final assessment category. Overall inter-observer agreement for the kinetic curve pattern was good.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy for breast mass: Preoperative predictors of invasive breast cancer

Objectives

To identify preoperative features that could be used to predict invasive breast cancer in women with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at ultrasound (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB).

Methods

A total of 86 DCIS lesions that were diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge CNB and excised surgically in 84 women were assessed. We retrospectively reviewed the patients’ medical records, mammography, US, and MR imaging. We compared underestimation rates of DCIS for the collected clinical and radiologic variables and determined the preoperative predictive factors for upstaging to invasive cancer.

Results

Twenty-seven (31.4%) of 86 DCIS lesions were upgraded to invasive cancer. Preoperative features that showed a significantly higher underestimation of DCIS were palpability or nipple discharge (p = 0.040), number of core specimens less than 5 (p = 0.011), mammographic maximum lesion size of 25 mm or larger (p = 0.022), mammographic mass size of 40 mm or larger (p = 0.046), sonographic mass size of 32 mm or larger (p = 0.009), lesion size of 30 mm on MR (p = 0.004), lower signal intensity (SI) on fat-saturated T2-weighted MR images (FS-T2WI) (p = 0.005), heterogeneous or rim enhancement on MR images (p = 0.009), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values lower than 1.04 × 10⁻³ mm²/s on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Clinical symptom of palpability or nipple discharge, number of core specimen, mammographic maximum lesion or mass size, SI on FS-T2WI, heterogeneous or rim enhancement on MR, and ADC value may be helpful in predicting the upgrade to invasive breast cancer for DCIS diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge CNB.     

Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?

Objective

To evaluate the contribution of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) to breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasonography (BI-RADS US) categorization of solid breast masses.

Materials and methods

Totally 94 solid lesions with histopathological results in 49 patients were included in the study. US features of the lesions were classified according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) BI-RADS US lexicon. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively according to their PDUS properties and quantitatively with spectral analysis. Hypervascularity, penetration of vessels into the mass or branching-disordered course and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 were accepted as probable malignant criteria.

Results

Fifty-five of 94 lesions were benign (58.5%), while 39 (41.5%) were malignant histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of US and PDUS in the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 100%, 58.2%, 62.9%, 100% and 71.8%, 81.8%, 73.7%, 80.4%, respectively. Criteria used for the distinction of malignant and benign lesions like number of vessels (p < 0.05), distribution of tumoral vessels, morphology of vessels and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When sonographic findings were combined with PDUS and spectral analysis findings, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 52.7%, 60% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

PDUS and spectral analysis have no contribution to BI-RADS US. For the spectral analysis, when RI value is one or greater, malignancy risk significantly increases.     

Dynamic optical breast imaging: a novel technique to detect and characterize tumor vessels

Purpose

To prospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy of optical absorption imaging in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3–5 breast lesions.

Materials and methods

Forty-six patients with BI-RADS classification 3 (11%), 4 (44%) or 5 (44%) lesions, underwent a novel optical imaging examination using red light to illuminate the breast. Pressure was applied on the breast, and time-dependent curves of light absorption were recorded. Curves that consistently increased or decreased over time were classified as suspicious for malignancy. All patients underwent a core or surgical biopsy.

Results

Optical mammography showed a statistical difference in numbers of suspect pixels between benign (N = 12) and malignant (N = 35) lesions (respectively 1325 vs. 3170, P = 0.002). In this population, optical imaging had a sensitivity of 74%, specificity of 92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 79%. The optical signal did not vary according to any other parameter including breast size or density, age, hormonal status or histological type of lesions.

Conclusion

Optical imaging is a low-cost, non-invasive technique, yielding physiological information dependent on breast blood volume and oxygenation. It appears to have a good potential for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Further studies are warranted to define its potential role in breast cancer imaging.     

Avoidable surgical consultations in women with a positive screening mammogram: Experience from a southern region of the Dutch breast screening programme

Introduction

According to current Dutch guidelines, all women with a positive screening mammogram are referred for a full hospital assessment, which includes surgical consultation and radiological assessment. Surgical consultation may be unnecessary for many patients. Our objective was to determine how often surgical consultations can be avoided by radiological pre-assessment.

Materials and methods

All women with a positive screening mammogram, referred to our radiology department between 2002 and 2007, were included (n = 1014). Percentage of women that was downstaged to BI-RADS category 1 or 2 by radiological pre-assessment was calculated. Negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy was estimated from the in-hospital follow-up, which was available up to September 2012.

Results

423 of 1014 women (42%) were downstaged to BI-RADS category 1 or 2 by radiological pre-assessment. During follow-up, 8 of these 423 women (2%) developed a malignancy in the same breast. At least 6 of these malignancies were located at a different location as the original screening findings which led to the initial referral. The estimated NPV for malignancy was 99.5% (95%CI, 98.3–99.9).

Conclusion

By referring women with a positive screening mammogram to the radiology department for pre-assessment, a surgical consultation was avoided in 42%, with an estimated NPV of 99.5% for malignancy.     

The application of Virtual Touch tissue quantification (VTQ) in diagnosis of thyroid lesions: A preliminary study

Objectives

Virtual Touch tissue quantification (VTQ) is a quantified ultrasound (US) acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging method that provides numerical measurements (wave-velocity values) of tissue stiffness. The purpose of this study was to detect whether VTQ could be applied to differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid lesions.

Methods

Healthy subjects’ thyroid tissue and thyroid lesions were examined by VTQ to analyze their elasticity after conventional ultrasound. All the thyroid lesions were analyzed pathologically after surgery and correlated the VTQ values with the pathological results.

Results

The VTQ value of healthy thyroid tissue, the benign lesions, and the malignant lesions were 1.69 ± 0.41 m/s, 2.03 ± 0.42 m/s, and 3.10 ± 1.08 m/s, respectively. The VTQ value of the malignant lesions was higher than that of the healthy thyroid tissue and the benign lesions (both p < 0.001). The VTQ value of the benign lesions was higher than that of the healthy thyroid tissue (p < 0.001). With a cutoff value of 2.42 m/s, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for differentiating between the benign and the malignancy lesions were 80.00%, 89.23%, 87.05%, 69.56%, and 93.54%, respectively.

Conclusions

VTQ could provide quantitative elasticity measurements, which might play an important role in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid lesions.     

Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: Combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Objective

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), the combined use of two modalities, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differentiation of focal solid breast lesions.

Materials and methods

61 patients with BI-RADS category 3–5 breast lesions detected at conventional US underwent CEUS and MRI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional US, CEUS, combination of two modalities and MRI for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Results

Tissue specimens of 61 breast lesions were obtained either from surgical resection (n = 46) or from needle biopsy (n = 15). Histopathologic diagnosis revealed 28 benign and 33 malignant lesions. The diagnostic performance of conventional US and CEUS in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions showed no significant difference (P = 0.741). The combination of two modalities significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy compared with either conventional US or CEUS alone (P = 0.031 and P = 0.012, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (A_z) value for the combined use of two modalities for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions was 0.94, and that for MRI was 0.91, whereas no statistical difference was found between them (P = 0.296).

Conclusion

The combined use of conventional US and CEUS has a better diagnostic performance than either method alone and displays good agreement with MRI in the differentiation capability for benign and malignant breast lesions.     

Sonoelastography versus dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating BI-RADS III and IV breast masses

Background

Several clinical studies showed that sonoelastography was useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Contrast-enhanced MRI has emerged as a promising tool in the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Aim of work

To study the role of sonoelastography versus dynamic MRI in evaluating BI-RADS III, IV breast masses and detect which modality is of better sensitivity and specificity trying to guide the patient either to follow-up the lesion or proceed to lesion excision.

Subjects and methods

The study included 50 Egyptian patients (age ranged from 32 to 58 years) who presented by breast masses and categorized as BI-RADS III, IV by mammography and ultrasound. Sonoelastography and dynamic MRI were done for all the patients.

Results

Differentiation between BI-RADS III and IV by US elastography had 84% sensitivity and 84% specificity and by MRI had 88% sensitivity and 80% specificity.

Conclusion

Regarding the sonoelastography, it is an easy and cheap modality. The elasticity score is an important parameter for lesion characterization. Combination of morphologic and dynamic MRI studies is very important for the breast lesion evaluation. MRI is more sensitive but less specific than sonoelastography. Finally if we find any suspicious character elicited by either sonoelastography or MRI (BI-RADS IV), lesion excision is recommended.