Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST)

The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) has recommended a protocol with 13 quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures for detecting somatosensory abnormalities. Reliability is an important scientific property and has been adequately tested for cutaneous QST. This study evaluates intraoral sites for which no reliability trials have yet been published. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of 13 QST measures at intra- and extraoral trigeminal sites were investigated. Twenty-one healthy volunteers from Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden (13 women and 8 men, mean age 40.4 years, range 24–71) participated. Two independent examiners previously trained in the DFNS QST protocol examined the participants using the entire protocol. Each participant was examined twice on the same day, once by each examiner (inter-examiner reliability). After 1–3 weeks, one examiner re-examined all participants (intra-examiner reliability). The measurements were made on the skin of the right cheek, the tip of the tongue, and bilaterally on the gingival mucosa of the upper premolar region. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or kappa was used to calculate variations. Most tests had acceptable to excellent inter-examiner (ICC 0.41–0.89) and intra-examiner (ICC 0.43–0.87) reliability. For each test, inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities at intra- and extraoral sites were similar. No significant differences between right and left sides were found intraorally. We conclude that inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities of most QST measures are acceptable for assessing somatosensory function in the orofacial region.     

Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpation for sacroiliac joint dysfunction

The purpose of this study was to operationally define and evaluate inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the standing sacroiliac mobility (Gillet) test on 53 college students. Both inter- and intra-examiner reliability data showed high mean percentages of agreement (85.3% and 89.2%, respectively.) Cohen's unweighted kappa statistic for concordance was applied yielding "fair" concordance for aggregate intra-examiner data and "slight" concordance for aggregate inter-examiner data. The intra-examiner reliability data suggests that the Gillet test is clinically useful for a single examiner in assessing the sacroiliac joint for mobility dysfunction, especially at upper sacroiliac contact points. Linear regression analyses suggest that the test is sensitive, in that reliability improves with increasing perceived abnormality. Further revisions to the operational definition may improve both inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the Gillet test.     

Reliability in Evaluating Passive Intervertebral Motion of the Lumber Spine

Abstract

Passive intervertebral motion (PIVM) of the lumbar spine during forward bending was assessed independently during two grading trials by two physical therapists. The therapists each had a minimum of two years clinical experience with similar orthopaedic manual therapy skills, including the sidelying double leg technique utilized in this study. Six segments of the lumbar spine were graded as normal, hypomobile, or hypermobile. Subjects were six volunteers who had a history of low back pain (LBP) and were currently experiencing LBP symptoms. Each therapist graded the segmental mobility during two different trials to investigate both intra- and inter-examiner reliability. Data were analyzed by percent agreement, and Scott's pi 0 which is an indicator of reliability greater than that expected to occur by chance with nominal data. Results demonstrated intra-examiner reliability of 66.67% and 75.00%, with agreement greater than chance of 41.89% and 61.29% respectively. Inter-examiner reliability was 48.61% and agreement greater than chance was 18.35%.     

Reliability of Manual Mobility Testing of the Upper Cervical Spine in Subjects with Cervicogenic Headache

Abstract

The identification of a cervicogenic headache is determined by criteria as stated by the International Headache Society (IHS). One of the criteria involves a finding of abnormal tenderness or resistance to movement in the neck region. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of manual mobility testing of the upper cervical spine in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headaches in symptomatic subjects. Two groups of 20 subjects were required to meet initial criteria for a cervicogenic headache as adapted from the IHS. Subjects were not currently receiving medical treatment for headaches. To determine inter-examiner reliability, two examiners independently examined the 20 subjects (ages 22-48; 5 males and 15 females). Each examiner performed 15 mobility tests in random order on each subject. To establish intra-examiner reliability, a separate group of 20 subjects (ages 21-48; 3 males and 17 females) was evaluated by one examiner on two consecutive days. The Spearman's rho correlation was applied to the total number of abnormal findings recorded across each group of subjects. The Kappa correlation coefficient and percent agreement were used to compare the findings of each of the 15 mobility tests. They were also used to compare the identification of at least one abnormal finding for every subject. For this study, Kappa values ≥0.400 were considered acceptable. The Spearman's rho value for inter-examiner reliability was 0.943. Acceptable inter-examiner reliability was found on 11 out of 15 mobility tests, with Kappa values ranging from –0.053 to 1.000 and percent agreement values ranging from 70 to 100%. There was 100% agreement between examiners on whether the subject met the IHS criteria, resulting in a Kappa value of 1.000. The Spearman's rho value for intra-examiner reliability was also 0.943. Kappa values for intra-examiner reliability were acceptable for 11 out 15 tests and ranged from 0.208 to 1.000. The percent agreement values ranged from 60 to 100%. There was 100% agreement on consecutive days on whether the subject met the IHS criteria, yielding a Kappa value of 1.000. This study found that mobility testing, which includes palpation of the cervical spine, is a reliable tool, specifically in the identification of a cervicogenic headache in symptomatic subjects.     

Intra- and inter-examiner reliability of goniometer and inclinometer use in Craig’s test

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of measurement methods for femoral anterversion during Craig’s test. [Subjects and Methods] The study included 37 healthy participants (20 males and 17 females). Two novice examiners (Department of Physical Therapy students at Silla University) used three different methods to measure the femoral anterversion during Craig’s test: a goniometer, a goniometer with a laser beam, and an inclinometer. [Results] The intra-examiner reliability was high for both examiners with all three measurement methods, with scores of 0.82, 0.86, and 0.73 for examiner 1 and 0.74, 0.78, and 0.72 for examiner 2 for the goniometer, goniometer with the laser beam, and inclinometer, respectively. The inter-examiner reliability during Craig’s test was below moderate for both the goniometer (0.25) and inclinometer (0.27) and moderate for the goniometer with the laser beam (0.62). [Conclusion] This study found that Craig’s test using a goniometer with a laser beam had high intra-examiner reliability and moderate inter-examiner reliability. Clinically, these findings may supplement existing measurement skills and reduce the difficulty of locating the goniometer axis during Craig’s test.Key words: Craig’s test, Goniometer with a laser, Inclinometer     

Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of leg-length differential measurement: a preliminary study

The phenomenon of "short leg" has long been used and debated clinically. A uniquely chiropractic measurement technique was not studied in any of the few studies of reliability of measurement which have been reported. An inter- and intra-examiner reliability study was therefore performed to validate a prone leg length-differential test. Naive students (n = 40) were called, in random order, into three adjacent examining rooms where three experienced chiropractic clinicians measured differential leg lengths. Using standard placement a tape measure was read to the nearest mm to detect inequalities at the shoe-sole interface. The leg length differences were recorded, for both the straight and flexed legs prone positions, twice by each of the three clinicians. Intraclass correlations were significant for the two independent readings for all three examiners, indicating high reliability of the test. Good agreement among examiners was indicated as well by significant intraclass correlation in two of the three possible examiner combinations. These results argue strongly for the reality of the leg length inequality phenomenon and also that it can be reliably measured.     

Reliability of Joint Mobility and Pain Assessment of the Thoracic Spine and Rib Cage in Asymptomatic Individuals

Abstract

Despite the importance of correctly diagnosing a spinal dysfunction, limited research exists related to physical therapists' ability to reliably identify a joint exhibiting signs of dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of a thoracic spine and rib cage joint mobility and pain assessment between two experienced manipulative physical therapists. Nine healthy subjects (3 male, 6 female; ages 23-35) without history of mid- or low back pain participated. Posterior-to-anterior pressures were applied to the thoracic spine and rib articulations with anterior-to-posterior pressures applied to the costosternal joints of each subject by two examiners to evaluate joint mobility and pain provocation. Both examiners assessed all subjects twice and were blinded to subject identity. Kappa statistics were calculated using a strict and expanded definition of agreement to determine the between- and within-examiner reliability for each outcome. Intra-examiner reliability of joint mobility assessment ranged from slight to fair based on the strict agreement but improved to good when findings were compared across ± 1 spinal/rib level. Pain provocation reliability increased to very good under the expanded agreement; however, this finding should be viewed with caution due to limited pain prevalence in the subject sample. Selected clinical prediction rules, applied to the care of individuals with back pain, characterize the patient's regional mobility simply as hypomobile, normal, or hypermobile; consequently, we feel the results of an expanded definition of agreement may be more appropriate for clinic practice. Further research is needed to determine the reliability in individuals with thoracic spine and rib cage symptoms.     

Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study

Despite the paucity of research into the reliability of static palpation, it is still employed extensively as a diagnostic tool by manual medicine practitioners. This study tested the inter- and intra-examiner agreement of ten senior osteopathic students using static palpation on ten asymptomatic subjects. Four assessments of the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), sacral sulcus (SS), and the sacral inferior lateral angle (SILA) on every subject by all examiners resulted in 1200 assessments in total. Kappa (Kg) yielded intra-examiner agreement that ranged between less-than-chance to substantial for the SILA (Kg=-0.05 to 0.69; mean Kg=0.21), and slight to moderate for the PSIS (Kg=0.07 to 0.58; mean Kg=0.33) and the SS (Kg=0.02 to Kg=0.60; mean Kg=0.24), with 50% significant beyond the 0.05 level. Inter-examiner agreement was slight (PSIS Kg=0.04; SILA Kg=0.08; SS Kg=0.07) and significant at the 0.01 level. Intra-examiner agreement was greater than inter-examiner agreement, which was consistent with existing palpation reliability studies. The poor reliability of clinical tests involving palpation may be partially explained by error in landmark location.     

Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in palpation of the "primary respiratory mechanism" within the "cranial concept"

Inevitable subjectivity makes interexaminer reliability of manual assessment procedures a special matter of concern. The cranial concept (CC), one aspect of osteopathy, deals with very subtle changes that have to be palpated. One of the main principles of the CC is the primary respiratory mechanism (PRM), which is hypothesized to be a palpable physiological phenomenon that occurs in rhythmic cycles, called flexion- and extension-phase, which are independent from cardiac and respiratory rates. Palpation of the PRM is one of the first steps in assessment within the CC. An inter- and intraexaminer reliability study design for repeated measures was used in this study. Forty nine healthy subjects were palpated simultaneously twice, once at the head and once at the pelvis. PRM-frequency (f), the mean duration of the flexion phase and the mean ratio of flexion- to extension-phase were used as the main outcome measures. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability and correlations to the respiratory rates were analysed for all three parameters. Inter- as well as intraexaminer agreement could not be described beyond chance agreement, as the range within the 95% limits of agreement (e.g. for f=6.6 cycles/90 s) for all cases resembled the total range of values (e.g. for f=7 cycles/90 s) that were produced. A significant effect of the examiners' respiration was found for both examiners at the pelvis (P=0.004 for one examiner, P <0.0001 for the other examiner), and for one examiner only at the head (P=0.0017). No correlation could be found for the subjects' respiratory rates. In conclusion, PRM-rates could not be palpated reliably and under certain conditions were influenced by the examiners' respiratory rates. These results do not support the hypotheses behind the PRM. The role of PRM palpation for clinical decision making and the models explaining the PRM should therefore be rethought.     

The reliability of clinical judgments and criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back pain disorders: a preliminary reliability study

Abstract

Mechanisms-based classifications of pain have been advocated for their potential to aid understanding of clinical presentations of pain and improve clinical outcomes. However, the reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain and the clinical criteria upon which such classifications are based are not known. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of clinical judgments associated with: (i) mechanisms-based classifications of pain; and (ii) the identification and interpretation of individual symptoms and signs from a Delphi-derived expert consensus list of clinical criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability of an examination protocol performed by two physiotherapists on two separate cohorts of 40 patients was assessed. Data were analysed using kappa and percentage of agreement values. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement associated with clinicians' mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain was 'substantial' (kappa =0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.96; % agreement =87.5) and 'almost perfect' (kappa =0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.00; % agreement =92.5), respectively. Sixty-eight and 95% of items on the clinical criteria checklist demonstrated clinically acceptable (kappa ≥ 0.61 or % agreement ≥ 80%) inter- and intra-examiner reliability, respectively. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability of clinical judgments associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain should be investigated using larger samples of patients and multiple independent examiners.     

The reliability of clinical judgments and criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back pain disorders: a preliminary reliability study

Mechanisms-based classifications of pain have been advocated for their potential to aid understanding of clinical presentations of pain and improve clinical outcomes. However, the reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain and the clinical criteria upon which such classifications are based are not known. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of clinical judgments associated with: (i) mechanisms-based classifications of pain; and (ii) the identification and interpretation of individual symptoms and signs from a Delphi-derived expert consensus list of clinical criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability of an examination protocol performed by two physiotherapists on two separate cohorts of 40 patients was assessed. Data were analysed using kappa and percentage of agreement values. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement associated with clinicians’ mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain was ‘substantial’ (kappa  = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.96; % agreement  = 87.5) and ‘almost perfect’ (kappa  = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.00; % agreement = 92.5), respectively. Sixty-eight and 95% of items on the clinical criteria checklist demonstrated clinically acceptable (kappa ⩾ 0.61 or % agreement ⩾ 80%) inter- and intra-examiner reliability, respectively. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability of clinical judgments associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain should be investigated using larger samples of patients and multiple independent examiners.     

Assessment of combined movements of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic and low back pain subjects using a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system.

Combined movement examination (CME) is used by physiotherapists to assess and treat patients with low back pain (LBP). However, this method has not been subjected to quantitative assessment. The purpose of this study was to discover if CME of the lumbar spine could be measured with acceptable intra-examiner reliability and to make a preliminary investigation of the effect of LBP on the results of CME. Combined movement examination of the human thoracolumbar spine was measured using a three-dimensional electromagnetic goniometer (3SPACE Fastrak Polhemus, Colchester, Vermont, USA). 1. Intra-examiner reliability of CME was evaluated using a test-retest design; examination was repeated in 23 subjects without LBP and 16 with LBP. 2. A sample of 31 subjects without LBP and 23 subjects with LBP underwent CME, which involved measuring right and left sideflexion in the flexed, neutral and extended position. Pearson's r and the intraclass correlation coefficient for all variables ranged from 0.79 to 0.93 (P < 0.05). A MANOVA test (P < 0.05), comparing the combined effects of the two variables for each position, was used to test for a difference between the positions attained by the subjects with LBP and those without. Generally LBP subjects showed smaller ranges of movement than those without LBP. Each position was recorded as a degree of rotation around the x-axis (flexion/extension) and around the y-axis (left and right sideflexion). CME can be carried out with acceptable intra-examiner reliability; preliminary evidence is presented concerning the effectiveness of CME in identifying reduced spinal movement in LBP subjects.     

Interexaminer Reliability of Seated Motion Palpation for the Stiffest Spinal Site

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the interexaminer reliability of palpation for stiffness in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal regions.

Enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and determine the reliability of a newly -designed resistance-enhanced dynamometer for muscle strength measurement, and to test the hypothesis that enhancing the examiner's resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements. DESIGN: An intra-examiner, inter-examiner, intra-session and inter-session reliability study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five men (mean age 22.5 (standard deviation (SD) 1.7) years) were tested separately by 2 examiners using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer and a traditional hand-held dynamometer for an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study. Twenty-seven volunteers (mean age 22.1 (SD 0.8) years) were tested by a female examiner using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer for an intra- and inter-session reliability study. METHODS: Maximum resisting forces for the knee flexors and extensors were measured using the resistance-enhanced dynamometer and the traditional hand-held dynamometer. RESULTS: The traditional hand-held dynamometer had good intra-examiner reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.79-0.93) but poor inter-examiner reliability (ICC = 0.11-0.28). The resistance-enhanced dynamo meter had very good intra-examiner (ICC = 0.91-0.94), inter-examiner (ICC = 0.98), intra-session (ICC = 0.93-0.99) and inter-session (ICC = 0.91-0.92) reliability. The resistance-enhanced dynamometer also had better inter-examiner agreement (smallest real difference (SRD) 9-16% for resistance-enhanced dynamometer, 21-43% for traditional hand-held dynamometer). CONCLUSION: The resistance-enhanced dynamometer had very good reliability. Enhancing the examiner's resisting force appeared to improve the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements. The resistance-enhanced dynamometer is useful for muscle strength measurements in clinical practice.     

Cineradiography of the hypomobile first rib

A patient with bilateral chronic brachialgia was cineradiographically shown to have hypomobile first ribs bilaterally. This finding can be elicited by the Expiration-Inspiration (E-I) test, in which the patient is palpated just beneath the clavicles while breathing. Right side scalenus muscle activation restored the movement of the right first rib. The cineradiography confirms the validity of the palpatory E-I test which has been previously described.     

Accuracy and reliability of a smartphone application for measuring the knee joint angle

[Purpose] Recently, a photo-based smartphone application for angle measurement—“Grid line imaging application Professional”—was developed to evaluate joint disease treatments. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of the application. [Participants and Methods] We measured the knee joint of a mannequin using an application and a universal goniometer. Twelve examiners measured eight knee joints of mannequins at different arbitrary angles using the application and a universal goniometer. Correlations between the application and universal goniometer measurements were examined using scatter plots and correlation coefficients. Systematic errors of the application were visually confirmed using the Bland-Altman method. Intra-class correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the inter-examiner reliability of the application. [Results] The application and universal goniometer measurements showed a good correlation (r=0.99) and no systematic error. The intra-class correlation coefficient for inter-examiner reliability was 0.999. Furthermore, to evaluate intra-examiner reliability, six examiners measured six different knee joints twice using the application on a 2-day interval. The intra-class correlation coefficient for intra-examiner reliability was 0.982. [Conclusion] The accuracy of the application was equivalent to that of a universal goniometer, and both the inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities of the application were almost perfect.Key words: Angle measurement, Smartphone application, Reliability     

Reliability of Joint Mobility and Pain Assessment of the Thoracic Spine and Rib Cage in Asymptomatic Individuals

Despite the importance of correctly diagnosing a spinal dysfunction, limited research exists related to physical therapists'' ability to reliably identify a joint exhibiting signs of dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of a thoracic spine and rib cage joint mobility and pain assessment between two experienced manipulative physical therapists. Nine healthy subjects (3 male, 6 female; ages 23–35) without history of mid- or low back pain participated. Posterior-to-anterior pressures were applied to the thoracic spine and rib articulations with anterior-to-posterior pressures applied to the costosternal joints of each subject by two examiners to evaluate joint mobility and pain provocation. Both examiners assessed all subjects twice and were blinded to subject identity. Kappa statistics were calculated using a strict and expanded definition of agreement to determine the between- and within-examiner reliability for each outcome. Intra-examiner reliability of joint mobility assessment ranged from slight to fair based on the strict agreement but improved to good when findings were compared across ± 1 spinal/rib level. Pain provocation reliability increased to very good under the expanded agreement; however, this finding should be viewed with caution due to limited pain prevalence in the subject sample. Selected clinical prediction rules, applied to the care of individuals with back pain, characterize the patient''s regional mobility simply as hypomobile, normal, or hypermobile; consequently, we feel the results of an expanded definition of agreement may be more appropriate for clinic practice. Further research is needed to determine the reliability in individuals with thoracic spine and rib cage symptoms.KEYWORDS: Joint Flexibility, Observer Variation, Rib, Thoracic VertebraeThe examination and evaluation of joint mobility dysfunction is an important factor in the differential diagnosis of thoracic and chest pain¹. Mobility dysfunction of the thoracic vertebrae and rib articulations has been linked to a variety of pain syndromes of the upper quarter, low back, and neck regions as well as atypical chest pain^2–4. The presence of a symptomatic joint dysfunction would suggest a musculoskeletal origin of, or contribution to, a patient''s chief complaint.While a variety of joint mobility tests have been described^5,6, the application of a posteroanterior (PA) pressure to the joint in question is routinely used⁷. During this test, the clinician assesses the magnitude of the motion with respect to the applied force, thus qualitatively determining the joint stiffness. In addition, the clinician is observant of any accompanying pain response by the patient, oftentimes directly questioning the patient as to whether the applied pressure provoked pain. This combined information can then be integrated by the clinician with additional examination findings to determine the appropriate diagnosis and develop a treatment plan. A survey of manual physical therapists revealed that 98% of the therapists based at least part of their treatment decision on the results of segmental motion assessment⁸. For example, an identified hypermobile or hypomobile joint based on accessory motion evaluation can be used to classify the nature of non-specific back pain⁹ as well as serving as an initial point of intervention. The treatment classification system summarized by Fritz et al¹⁰ includes lumbar spine hypomobility or hypermobility as one of the criteria associated with deciding whether spinal thrust manipulation or stabilization exercises, respectively, are appropriate. The use of this treatment classification system among individuals with acute low back pain resulted in a significant improvement in disability during the initial weeks of care compared to treatment based on clinical practice guidelines¹¹.Examiner reliability of PA pressures during spinal and rib joint assessments has been previously investigated, with between and within-examiner reliability ranging from poor to moderate^6,12,13. However, methodological limitations of these prior studies have been identified (e.g., inappropriate statistical analysis of agreement between and within examiners; influence of spinal level identification on examiner reliability), suggesting that additional evaluation of this common clinic measure is warranted¹⁴. Further, the reliability of both motion stiffness and pain provocation has not been simultaneously evaluated in both the thoracic spine and rib cage. Given the routine use of this examination technique, the determination of reliability is necessary. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of thoracic spine and rib cage joint mobility assessment and associated pain provocation between two experienced manipulative physical therapists. To address the influence of spinal level identification on examiner reliability, both a strict and expanded definition of agreement was employed.     

The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of passive physiological accessory movement assessment of lumbar spine in novice manual therapists

Passive Physiological Accessory Movements (PPAVMs) are commonly used assessment and treatment techniques in patients with low back pain. Many physiotherapists, including novices, consider PPAVMs an important tool for assessment and treatment of low back pain. Reliability is important as a judgement on the reproducibility of assessment procedures between therapists. However, the reliability of PPAVMs seems to have some problems, and reliability of PPAVMs has not yet been established amongst novice manual therapists. This study aimed at investigating inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of PPAVMs in novice physiotherapists. Fifty two healthy participants were recruited for the study. PPAVMs were applied by two novice physiotherapists and accessory movements were assessed, and both the raters were blinded from each others' findings to avoid bias. The mobility was graded on a three point scale with grade 1 being considered as hypomobile, 2 as normal and 3 as hypermobile. This procedure was performed on all five lumbar segments. Each participant was assessed on the same day for inter-rater reliability, and for intra-rater reliability the participant was assessed by one rater a week later. Kappa (κ) was calculated for all the levels of lumbar spine which ranged between 0.01 and 0.30 for inter-rater reliability and 0.24 to 0.57 for intra-rater reliability. Percentage exact agreement was also computed which showed a range between 38.4% and 57.6%. The values of 'κ' showed poor intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. However, further research is advisable in order to assess the role of experience in reproducibility of PPAVMs.     

Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the standing flexion test.

The practice of musculoskeletal medicine requires the use of a wide variety of clinical examination procedures to establish a diagnosis, plan treatment, and monitor patient progress. Many of these examination procedures constitute a significant part of daily practice. Despite their extensive use, the reliability and validity of many of these assessment procedures remains questionable. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpatory findings for the standing flexion test; one test for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Nine examiners performed the standing flexion test on nine asymptomatic subjects. Inter-examiner reliability data, with a mean percentage agreement of 42% and a kappa coefficient of 0.052, demonstrated statistically insignificant reliability. Intra-examiner reliability data demonstrated a mean percentage agreement of 68% and a kappa coefficient of 0.46 indicating moderate reliability. These results suggest that the reliability of the standing flexion test as an indicator of SIJ dysfunction still remains questionable. Before this test can be relied upon as an accurate indicator of SIJ dysfunction it must undergo further research. This research must not only further standardize the procedure, but also ascertain reliability and validity.     

Reproducibility of acquiring ultrasonographic infant hip images by the Graf method after an infant hip ultrasound training course

Purpose

The objective screening of infant hips using ultrasonography (Graf method) is gaining favor in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in Japan. However, the accuracy of the Graf method is dependent on the examiner’s experience and technique. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of acquiring ultrasonic hip images and their evaluation after examiners attended an infant hip ultrasound training course.

Materials and methods

Ultrasonic images of 70 hips of 35 newborns who were screened by ultrasonography using the Graf method, were evaluated. The images were acquired by two inexperienced examiners who attended the training course. The inter- and intra-examiner measurement errors as well as reproducibility were calculated based on the images obtained.

Results

The intra-examiner measurement error in the acquired images of the same hip was minor. The inter-examiner measurement error was also small. The intra- and inter-examiner agreements of the Graf classification were high. The intra-examiner reproducibility of the acquired ultrasonic images was substantial, and the inter-examiner reproducibility was almost perfect.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that inexperienced examiners could obtain ultrasonic infant hip joint images with minor differences and high reproducibility after the training course. Our findings raise the possibility of extending the infant hip ultrasound course in Japan.