Cooking birch pollen-related food: divergent consequences for IgE- and T cell-mediated reactivity in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND: The major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 cross-reacts with homologous food allergens, resulting in IgE-mediated oral allergy syndromes (OASs). To avoid this food, allergy allergologists and guidebooks advise patients to consume birch pollen-related foods after heating. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether cooked Bet v 1-related food allergens induce IgE- and T cell-mediated reactions in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Recombinant Bet v 1, Mal d 1 (apple), Api g 1 (celery), and Dau c 1 (carrot) were incubated at increasing temperatures. Protein structures were determined by means of circular dichroism. Mediator release was tested in basophil activation assays. PBMCs and Bet v 1-specific T-cell lines with known epitope specificity were stimulated with native and cooked food allergens. Patients with birch pollen allergy who experienced OAS and the exacerbation of atopic dermatitis (AD) on ingestion of fresh apple, celery, or carrot were retested in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges with the respective foods in cooked form. RESULTS: In vitro, cooked food allergens lost the capacity to bind IgE and to induce mediator release but had the same potency to activate Bet v 1-specific T cells as native proteins. In vivo, ingestion of cooked birch pollen-related foods did not induce OAS but caused atopic eczema to worsen. CONCLUSION: T-cell cross-reactivity between Bet v 1 and related food allergens occurs independently of IgE cross-reactivity in vitro and in vivo. In patients with AD, the resulting immune reaction can even manifest as late eczematous skin reactions. Therefore the view that cooked pollen-related foods can be consumed without allergologic consequences should be reconsidered. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Symptom-free consumed pollen-related food allergens might cause T cell-mediated late-phase skin reactions in patients with pollen allergy and AD.     

Gastrointestinal digestion of Bet v 1-homologous food allergens destroys their mediator-releasing, but not T cell-activating, capacity

BACKGROUND: Food allergy to apples, hazelnuts, and celery is frequent in individuals with birch pollen allergy because IgE antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, cross-react with structurally related allergens in these foods. In addition, T lymphocytes specific for Bet v 1 also cross-react with these dietary proteins. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects of simulated gastrointestinal degradation of Bet v 1-related food allergens on their mediator-releasing and T cell-activating capacity. METHODS: Recombinant Mal d 1, Cor a 1.04, and Api g 1 were incubated separately with pepsin and trypsin. Binding of IgE was tested in immunoblots. After successive incubation with both enzymes, allergens were tested in mast cell mediator release assays and used to stimulate PBMCs and Bet v 1-specific T-cell lines and clones. Proteolytic fragments of allergens were analyzed and sequenced by means of mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Pepsin completely destroyed IgE binding of all allergens within 1 second, and trypsin completely destroyed IgE binding of all allergens within 15 minutes, except for the major hazelnut allergen, which remained intact for 2 hours of trypsinolysis. Allergens after gastrointestinal digestion did not induce basophil activation but induced proliferation in PBMCs from allergic and nonallergic individuals. Digested Mal d 1 and Cor a 1.04 still activated Bet v 1-specific T cells, whereas digested Api g 1 did not. Different proteolytic fragments of Mal d 1 and Cor a 1.04 matching relevant Bet v 1 T-cell epitopes were found. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal degradation of Bet v 1-related food allergens destroys their histamine-releasing, but not T cell-activating, property. Our data emphasize that birch pollen-related foods are relevant activators of pollen-specific T cells.     

Successful sublingual immunotherapy with birch pollen has limited effects on concomitant food allergy to apple and the immune response to the Bet v 1 homolog Mal d 1

BACKGROUND: Cross-reactivity between the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, and the apple protein, Mal d 1, frequently causes food allergy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of successful sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with birch pollen extract on apple allergy and the immune response to Bet v 1 and Mal d 1. METHODS: Before and after 1 year of SLIT, Bet v 1-sensitized patients with oral allergy syndrome to apple underwent nasal challenges with birch pollen and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges with apple. Bet v 1-specific and Mal d 1-specific serum antibody levels and proliferation in PBMCs and allergen-specific T-cell lines (TCLs) were determined. Bet v 1-specific TCLs were mapped for T-cell epitopes. RESULTS: In 9 patients with improved nasal provocation scores to birch pollen, apple-induced oral allergy syndrome was not significantly reduced. Bet v 1-specific IgE and IgG(4) levels significantly increased. Bet v 1-specific T-cell responses to all epitopes and those cross-reactive with Mal d 1 significantly decreased. However, neither Mal d 1-specific IgE and IgG(4) levels nor Mal d 1-induced T-cell proliferation changed significantly. In contrast, Mal d 1-specific TCLs showed increased responses to Mal d 1 after 1 year of SLIT. CONCLUSION: This longitudinal study indicates that pollen SLIT does not efficiently alter the immune response to pollen-related food allergens, which may explain why pollen-associated food allergy is frequently not ameliorated by pollen immunotherapy even if respiratory symptoms significantly improve. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SLIT with birch pollen may have no clinical effect on associated apple allergy.     

Bet v 1142-156 is the dominant T-cell epitope of the major birch pollen allergen and important for cross-reactivity with Bet v 1-related food allergens

BACKGROUND: Individuals with birch pollen allergy frequently experience hypersensitivity reactions to certain foods, primarily because of IgE antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 that cross-react with homologous food allergens. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the major T-cell epitopes of Bet v 1 and to investigate their involvement in the cellular cross-reactivity with homologous food allergens. METHODS: T-cell epitope mapping of Bet v 1 was performed by testing Bet v 1-specific T-cell lines derived from 57 individuals with birch pollen allergy, with overlapping peptides representing the entire allergen. T-cell lines and T-cell clones were stimulated with Bet v 1-related major allergens from apple (Mal d 1), cherry (Pru av 1), hazelnut (Cor a 1), celery (Api g 1), carrot (Dau c 1), and soybean (Gly m 4) and with peptides deduced from the C-terminal amino acid sequences of these molecules. Results Bet v 1 142-156 , positioned in the highly conserved C-terminal region of Bet v 1, was identified as the major T-cell epitope recognized by 61% of individuals. Most T lymphocytes specific for Bet v 1 142-156 were activated by one or more homologous food proteins or the respective peptides, as indicated by proliferation and cytokine production. CONCLUSION: The major T-cell epitope of Bet v 1, Bet v 1 142-156 , plays an important role in the cellular cross-reactivity between this respiratory allergen and related food allergens. Thus T lymphocytes specific for Bet v 1 142-156 might be activated by various Bet v 1-related food allergens in vivo, even out of the pollen season.     

Characterization of the T cell response to the major hazelnut allergen, Cor a 1.04: evidence for a relevant T cell epitope not cross-reactive with homologous pollen allergens

BACKGROUND: IgE antibodies specific for the major birch-pollen allergen, Bet v 1, cross-react with homologous allergens in particular foods, e.g. apples, carrots and hazelnuts. In a high number of tree pollen-allergic individuals, this cross-reactivity causes clinical symptoms, commonly known as the 'birch-fruit-syndrome'. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the T cell response to the Bet v 1-related major allergen in hazelnuts, Cor a 1.04, and its cellular cross-reactivity with Bet v 1 and the homologous hazel pollen allergen, Cor a 1. METHODS: Using recombinant Cor a 1.04, T cell lines (TCL) and T cell clones (TCC) were established from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of tree pollen-allergic patients with associated food allergy. T cell epitopes were determined using overlapping synthetic peptides in Cor a 1.04-reactive TCL and TCC. In parallel, reactivity to Bet v 1 and Cor a 1 was tested. RESULTS: In total, 20 distinct T cell epitopes on the hazelnut allergen were identified. Several Cor a 1.04-specific TCL and TCC reacted with pollen allergens albeit less pronounced than with the hazelnut allergen. Several Cor a 1.04-specific TCC did not react with pollen allergens. Interestingly, these clones were found to react with the Bet v 1-related major allergen in carrots, Dau c 1. The cellular cross-reactivity between both food allergens could be associated with the most frequently recognized T cell epitope of Cor a 1.04, Cor a 1.04(142-153). CONCLUSIONS: The major hazelnut allergen cross-reacts with the major allergens of birch and hazel pollen but apparently contains a relevant T cell epitope not shared with pollen allergens. Our finding may have important implications for the specific immunotherapy of tree pollen-allergic patients suffering from concomitant hazelnut allergy.     

Crossreactivity and T-cell epitope specificity of Bet v 1-specific T cells suggest the involvement of multiple isoallergens in sensitization to birch pollen

Background Allergen-specific T lymphocytes play an important role in the pathophysiology of atopic disease. Detailed studies of their epitope-specificity and crossreactivity are required for the development of novel approaches for specific immunotherapy. Objectives The aim of the study was to characterize the fine specificity of Bet v 1-specific T cells from allergic donors. Methods Polyclonal T-cell lines (TCL) and T-cell clones (TCC), specific for Bet v 1, the major birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen allergen, were isolated from the peripheral blood of three birch-allergic patients. Their epitope-specificity was studied using overlapping synthetic peptides, and crossreactivity with other tree pollen allergens of the Fagales order was evaluated. In addition, the Bet v 1-specific TCC were studied for their phenotype and cytokine production. Results All isolated Bet v 1-specific TCC (19/21 CD4⁺, 2/21 CD8⁺) reacted with affinity purified Bet v 1, but showed different reactivities with recombinant Bet v 1 (rBet v 1), and with group 1 allergens from other Fagales species. Epitope mapping of rBet v 1-reactive TCC with synthetic peptides of Bet v 1 showed the presence of four T-cell epitopes. Polyclonal T-cell lines reacted with 13 different peptides, and displayed even broader crossreactivity with group 1 pollen allergens from other Fagales members. Conclusion This study demonstrates that apart from T-cell epitopes of rBet v 1, many other crossreactive or Bet v 1 isoallergen-specific epitopes exist. This indicates that isoallergenic variation plays an important role in the induction of Bet v 1-specific and crossreactive T-cell responsiveness to allergens.     

Antibody profiles and self-reported symptoms to pollen-related food allergens in grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe

BACKGROUND: Most studies on pollen-related food allergy have so far focused on the association of birch/weed pollen allergens and plant food allergy. The aim of this study was to elucidate the allergen spectrum among a group of grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe and to relate the results to clinical histories of pollen-related food allergy. METHODS: Fifty-eight grass pollen-allergic patients answered a questionnaire regarding allergy to foods. Blood samples were taken to test IgE-reactivity to a large panel of pollen allergens and pollen- and nonpollen-related food allergens using crude allergen extracts and recombinant and native allergens. RESULTS: Three different groups of grass pollen-allergic patients were identified according to their IgE antibody profile: a grass pollen group only (19%), a grass and tree pollen group (29%) and a grass, tree and compositae (pan-) pollen group (48%). No sensitization to Bet v 1 as well as almost no IgE to plant food was observed in the grass pollen group. In contrast, nearly all patients in the two tree-related groups had IgE to Bet v 1, which reflected the high frequency of adverse reactions to typical birch-related food in these groups. Only four patients belonging to the pan-pollen group displayed IgE to profilin Phl p 12/Bet v 2. Patients in the pan-pollen group reported significantly more symptoms to food allergens compared with patients in the two other groups. The most frequently reported symptom was the oral allergy syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization to grass pollen alone is rare among grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe. The majority of patients are in addition sensitized to birch (Bet v 1), which seems to be closely related to their pollen-derived food allergy. The study highlights the advantage of using well-defined allergen molecules for the diagnosis of cross-reactivity between pollen and food allergens.     

Anaphylaxis to camomile: clinical features and allergen cross-reactivity

BACKGROUND: Medicinal remedies of plant origin became very popular in recent years, and allergic reactions to these are on the rise, accordingly. Camomile has been reported as a potential trigger of severe anaphylaxis. The allergens responsible for camomile allergy have not been characterized as yet. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at reviewing the clinical symptomatology of immediate-type reactions in a series of patients sensitized to camomile and at characterizing the responsible allergens. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a history of allergy either to camomile or to spices or weeds, and a positive skin prick test/RAST to camomile were investigated for related allergic reactions to food, pollen and others. IgE-binding patterns were determined by immunoblotting, inhibition tests and deglycosylation experiments. RESULTS: Ten of 14 patients had a clinical history of immediate-type reactions to camomile, in some cases life threatening. Eleven subjects were also sensitized to mugwort in prick or RAST, eight to birch tree pollen. Using a polyclonal rabbit anti-Bet v 1 antibody, a homologue of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 was detected in two camomile blots. In four cases a group of higher molecular weight allergens (23-50 kDa) showed IgE-binding to camomile. All allergens proved heat stable. Binding was inhibited in variable degrees by extracts from celery roots, anize seeds and pollen from mugwort, birch and timothy grass. Deglycosylation experiments proved the presence of carbohydrate determinants in camomile which were not responsible for IgE-binding, though. Profilins (Bet v 2) were not detected in our camomile extracts. CONCLUSION: Incidence and risk of type I allergy to camomile may be underestimated. Concurrent sensitization to mugwort and birch pollen is not infrequent. Bet v 1 and noncarbohydrate higher molecular weight proteins were found to be eliciting allergens and are responsible for cross-reactivity with other foods and pollen.     

Birch pollen-related food as a provocation factor of allergic symptoms in children with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome

BACKGROUND: Food allergy to cow's milk or hen's egg is a common problem in children with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS) but the role of birch pollen-related food for the induction of allergic symptoms is still not clear. PATIENTS/METHODS: Twelve children (median age 5 years) with AEDS underwent an oral challenge with those birch pollen-related foods which were reported to induce no immediate symptoms, but were consumed on a regular basis. Total IgE and specific IgE to birch pollen, Bet v 1/2 and various birch pollen-related foods were determined. RESULTS: Seven of 12 children showed immediate and/or late eczematous reactions upon ingestion of birch pollen-related foodstuff. Four children showed a worsening of eczema 24 h upon oral challenge with a significant difference in SCORAD before and after challenge. There were no differences in terms of total IgE or birch pollen-specific IgE between children with a late eczematous response and non-reacting children. CONCLUSIONS: Birch pollen-related food may induce allergic symptoms in children with AEDS who exhibit a sensitization to birch pollen. Oral challenge tests should be performed in those children who suffer from severe AEDS and who are highly sensitized to birch pollen allergens even in the absence of a history suggestive of food allergy.     

Identification of B-cell epitopes of Bet v 1 involved in cross-reactivity with food allergens

Background:  The pollen-food syndrome (PFS) is an association of food allergies to fruits, nuts, and vegetables in patients with pollen allergy. Mal d 1, the major apple allergen, is one of the most commonly associated food allergens for birch pollen-allergic patients suffering from PFS. Although the reactions are due to cross-reactive IgE antibodies originally raised against pollen Bet v 1, not every Bet v 1-allergic patient develops clinical reactions towards apple.
Aim of the study:  We speculate that distinct IgE epitopes are responsible for the clinical manifestation of PFS. To test this hypothesis we grafted five Mal d 1 stretches onto Bet v 1. The grafted regions were 7- or 8-amino acids long encompassing amino acids residues previously shown to be crucial for IgE recognition of Bet v 1.
Methods:  A Bet v 1-Mal d 1 chimeric protein designated BMC was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. IgE reactivity of BMC was tested with patients' sera originating from (i) Bet v 1-allergic patients displaying no clinical symptoms upon ingestion of apples; and (ii) Bet v 1-allergic patients displaying allergic symptoms upon ingestion of apples and other Bet v 1-related foods.
Results and conclusion:  Compared to birch pollen-allergic individuals, patients suffering from PFS showed significantly higher IgE reactivity with BMC (chimeric protein). The results suggest that the Mal d 1 regions grafted onto the Bet v 1 sequence comprise important IgE epitopes recognized by Bet v 1-allergic patients suffering from allergy to apples.     

Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, initiates sensitization to Api g 1, the major allergen in celery: evidence at the T cell level

Due to IgE cross-reactivity, birch pollen-allergic individuals frequently develop type I hypersensitivity reactions to celery tuber. We evaluated the T cell response to the major allergen in celeriac, Api g 1, and the cellular cross-reactivity with its homologous major allergen in birch pollen, Bet v 1. Api g 1-specific T cell lines (TCL) and clones (TCC) were established from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of allergic patients. Epitope mapping of Api g 1 with overlapping Api g 1-derived peptides revealed one dominant T cell-activating region, Api g 1(109-126). TCL and TCC generated with Api g 1 cross-reacted with the birch pollen allergen and, although initially stimulated with the food allergen, cellular responses to Bet v 1 were stronger than to Api g 1. Epitope mapping with Bet v 1-derived peptides revealed that T cells specific for several distinct epitopes distributed over the complete Bet v 1 molecule could be activated by Api g 1. Bet v 1(109-126) was identified as the most important T cell epitope for cross-reactivity with Api g 1. This epitope shares 72% amino acid sequence similarity with the major T cell-activating region of the food allergen, Api g 1(109-126). Our data provide evidence that humoral as well as cellular reactivity to the major celery allergen is predominantly based on cross-reactivity with the major birch pollen allergen. The activation of Bet v 1-specific Th2 cells by Api g 1, in particular outside the pollen season, may have consequences for birch pollen-allergic individuals.     

Molecular cloning and characterization of a birch pollen minor allergen, Bet v 5, belonging to a family of isoflavone reductase-related proteins.

BACKGROUND: Birch pollen is a major cause of pollinosis and is responsible for cross-reactive oral allergies to fruits, nuts, and vegetables. The major allergen, Bet v 1, has been extensively characterized, and 3 minor allergens, Bet v 2, Bet v 3, and Bet v 4, have been cloned and sequenced. Recently, another birch pollen protein with an apparent mass of 35 kd was described as a new IgE-binding protein in birch pollen with cross-reacting homologues in plant foods. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the primary structure of the 35-kd birch pollen allergen and to investigate its immunologic properties. METHODS: On the basis of a known complementary DNA fragment, a PCR strategy was applied to obtain the full-length nucleotide sequence of the coding region. The protein was expressed as His-Tag fusion protein in Escherichia coli and purified by Ni-chelate affinity chromatography. Nonfusion protein was obtained by cyanogen bromide treatment of the fusion protein. IgE-binding characteristics and potential allergenicity were investigated by immunoblot, immunoblot inhibition analysis, rat basophil leukemia-cell mediator release assay, and basophil histamine release and compared with those of natural (n) Bet v 5, recombinant (r)Bet v 1, and rBet v 2. RESULTS: Recombinant Bet v 5 has a mass of 33 kd, an isoelectric point of 9.0, and sequence identity of 60% to 80% to isoflavone reductase homologue proteins from various plants. On immunoblots the recombinant Bet v 5 bound IgE from 9 (32%) of 28 sera from patients allergic to birch pollen with a CAP class of at least 3; Bet v 1 was detected by 89% of these patients. IgE immunoblot and inhibition experiments showed that nBet v 5 and rBet v 5 shared identical epitopes. A rabbit antiserum raised against pea isoflavone reductase and patients' IgE reacted with Bet v 5 and proteins of similar size in several vegetable foods, including exotic fruits. A similar reaction pattern was obtained with 2 Bet v 5-specific mAbs. Furthermore, Bet v 5 triggered a dose-dependent mediator release from rat basophil leukemia 2H3 cells passively sensitized with murine anti-birch pollen IgE and from basophils of a Bet v 5-reactive subject with birch pollen allergy. In contrast, no mediator release could be induced from basophils of a subject who was monosensitized to Bet v 1. CONCLUSIONS: This 33-kd protein, designated as Bet v 5, is a new minor allergen in birch pollen and may be responsible for pollen-related oral allergy to specific foods in a minority of patients with birch pollen allergy. Amino acid sequence comparison and immunoreactivity to anti-isoflavone reductase serum indicate that Bet v 5 is related to isoflavone reductase, a protein family that is involved in plant defense reactions.     

Soybean allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen: clinical investigation and molecular characterization of allergens

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to legumes are generally thought to be acquired by means of primary sensitization through the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, Gly m 4 (starvation-associated message 22), a Bet v 1-related pathogenesis-related protein 10 from soy, was suggested to be an allergen in patients with allergic reactions to a dietary product containing a soy protein isolate. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of Gly m 4 in subjects allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy and to assess the risk for subjects allergic to birch pollen to acquire soy allergy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy confirmed by means of positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results (n = 16) or a convincing history (n = 6) were investigated for IgE reactivity to birch pollen and soy allergens by using the Pharmacia CAP system and immunoblot analysis. Cross-reactivity was assessed by means of enzyme allergosorbent test inhibition. Ninety-four patients with birch pollen allergy were interviewed to assess soy tolerance and screened for IgE reactivity to Gly m 4 by means of immunoblotting. The Gly m 4 content in soy foods and soybean varieties was investigated by means of quantitative evaluation of immunoblots. RESULTS: During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, 10 patients experienced symptoms localized to the oral cavity, and 6 patients had a more severe reaction. CAP analysis revealed Gly m 4-specific IgE in 96% (21/22) of the patients. All patients had Bet v 1-specific IgE antibodies, and 23% (5/22) had positive Bet v 2 results. In IgE immunoblotting 25% (6/22) of the patients recognized soy profilin (Gly m 3), and 64% (14/22) recognized other soy proteins. IgE binding to soy was at least 80% inhibited by birch pollen and 60% inhibited by rGly m 4 in 9 of 11 sera tested. Seventy-one percent (67/94) of highly Bet v 1-sensitized patients with birch pollen allergy were sensitized to Gly m 4, and 9 (9.6%) of those patients reported soy allergy. The Gly m 4 content in soy products ranged between 0 and 70 ppm (milligrams per kilogram). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that soybean is another birch pollen-related allergenic food. Gly m 4 is the major soy allergen for patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy. The content of Gly m 4 in soy food products strongly depends on the degree of food processing.     

Ara h 8, a Bet v 1-homologous allergen from peanut, is a major allergen in patients with combined birch pollen and peanut allergy

BACKGROUND: We recently described patients with soybean allergy mainly mediated by cross-reactivity to birch pollen allergens. A majority of those patients were reported to have peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the occurrence of peanut allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen and characterized the Bet v 1-homologous peanut allergen Ara h 8. METHODS: Recombinant Ara h 8 was cloned with degenerated primers and expressed in Escherichia coli. Nine Swiss and 11 Dutch patients with peanut and birch pollen allergy and a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge result to peanut were investigated for IgE reactivity to birch pollen and purified peanut allergens and cross-reactivity between birch and peanut. Ara h 8 stability against digestion and roasting was assessed by means of RAST inhibition. The IgE cross-linking potency of Ara h 8 was tested on the basis of basophil histamine release. RESULTS: During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, all patients experienced symptoms in the oral cavity, progressing to more severe symptoms in 40% of patients. CAP-FEIA detected recombinant (r) Ara h 8-specific IgE in 85%. IgE binding to Ara h 8 was inhibited by Bet v 1 in peanut extract immunoblotting and in RAST inhibition. In EAST inhibition recombinant rAra h 8 inhibited IgE binding to peanut in 4 of 7 tested patient sera. Antipeanut response was dominated by Ara h 8 in 12 of 17 tested patients. Furthermore, our results demonstrate a low stability of Ara h 8 to roasting and no stability to gastric digestion. Basophil histamine release with rAra h 8 was more than 20% in 5 of 7 tested sera. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut allergy might be mediated in a subgroup of our patients by means of cross-reaction of Bet v 1 with the homologous peanut allergen Ara h 8.     

Molecular approaches for new vaccines against allergy

Type I allergy represents an important health problem that is currently affecting approximately 25% of the population in Western countries. Immunotherapy, the only causative treatment of Type I allergy, is currently performed with crude allergen extracts, which contain unpredictable amounts of allergenic, as well as nonallergenic, components. The application of molecular biology for allergen characterization has revealed the molecular nature of the most common allergens and allowed the production of recombinant allergens that equal natural allergens. Based on this knowledge, several different strategies to improve immunotherapy have become available. Until now, T-cell peptides, selected wild-type-like recombinant allergens and genetically modified hypoallergenic allergen derivatives have been evaluated in clinical trials in patients. Immunotherapy based on T-cell peptides has focused on allergen-specific T-cell responses, whereas genetically modified recombinant allergen molecules offer the advantage of combining T-cell and B-cell epitopes. Genetically modified recombinant birch pollen derivatives (Bet v 1-fragments, Bet v 1-trimer) have been evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Vaccination with the Bet v 1-derivatives improved symptoms of birch pollen allergy, induced a healthy allergen-specific immunoglobulin G response and led to a significant reduction of seasonally induced boosts of immunoglobulin E.     

Non-anaphylactic surface-exposed peptides of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, for preventive vaccination

BACKGROUND: Almost 100 million allergic patients are sensitized to the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, a 17 kDa protein containing most of the IgE epitopes present in pollens of trees belonging to the Fagales order and plant-derived food. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to develop an approach for the rational design of B cell epitope-derived, non-allergenic peptide allergy vaccines. METHODS: According to the three-dimensional (3-D) structure of birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, six peptides comprising 25-32 preferably solvent-exposed amino acids were synthesized. RESULTS: Because of lack of secondary structure, the peptides showed no allergenic activity in allergic patients. In a mouse model of birch pollen allergy, peptide vaccination induced Bet v 1-specific IgG and prevented IgE-mediated allergic sensitization to Bet v 1. The protective role of peptide-induced blocking antibodies is demonstrated by inhibition of allergic patients IgE binding to the allergen and by blocking of allergen-induced basophil degranulation. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate the mechanistic importance of blocking antibodies for allergy vaccination and present a B cell epitope-based approach for the rational design of safe peptide allergy vaccines whenever the structure of the disease-eliciting allergen is known.     

Carrot allergy: double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge and identification of allergens

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to carrot affect up to 25% of food-allergic subjects. Clinical manifestations of carrot allergy and IgE responses to carrot proteins, however, have never been studied in subjects with carrot allergy confirmed by means of double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this investigation were to confirm clinically relevant sensitizations to carrot by means of DBPCFC, to validate current diagnostic methods, and to identify IgE-reactive carrot proteins in patients with true allergy. METHODS: DBPCFCs were performed in 26 subjects with histories of allergic reactions to carrot. Patients underwent skin prick tests with carrot extract, fresh carrot, and various pollen extracts. Specific IgE to carrot, celery, birch, and mugwort pollen and to rBet v 1, rBet v 2, and rBet v 6 were measured through use of the CAP method. Carrot allergens were identified by means of immunoblotting and blotting inhibition. RESULTS: Twenty of 26 patients had positive DBPCFC results. The sensitivity of the determination of carrot-specific IgE antibodies through use of the CAP method (> or =0.7 kU/L) was 90%, the sensitivity for skin prick testing with commercial extracts was 26%, and the sensitivity for prick-to-prick tests with raw carrot was 100%. The Bet v 1--related major carrot allergen Dau c 1 was recognized by IgE from 85% of patients; 45% were sensitized to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and 20% to carrot profilin. In 1 subject, a Bet v 6--related carrot allergen was recognized. In 4 patients, IgE binding to Dau c 1 was not inhibited or was weakly inhibited by rBet v 1 or birch pollen extract. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the allergenicity of carrot by means of DBPCFC. DBPCFC-positive patients had exclusively specific IgE antibodies to birch pollen--related carrot allergens, Dau c 1 being the major allergen. The lack of inhibition of IgE binding to Dau c 1 by birch allergens in a subgroup of patients might indicate an secondary immune response to new epitopes on the food allergen that are not cross-reactive with Bet v 1.     

Birch pollen-related food allergy to legumes: identification and characterization of the Bet v 1 homologue in mungbean (Vigna radiata), Vig r 1

BACKGROUND: Recently allergic reactions to legumes mediated by Bet v 1-homologous food allergens were described for soy and peanut. In this study we assessed allergic reactions to another legume, to mungbean seedlings, and identified its Bet v 1-homologous allergen Vig r 1. METHODS: Ten patients were selected who had a history of allergic reactions to mungbean seedlings and a respiratory allergy to birch pollen. The Bet v 1 homologue in mungbean seedlings, Vig r 1, was cloned by a PCR strategy, expressed in Escherichia coli, and purified by preparative SDS-PAGE. In all sera, specific IgE against birch pollen, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, Vig r 1, and the Bet v 1 homologues in soy (Gly m 4) and cherry (Pru av 1) was determined by CAP-FEIA. Cross-reactivity of specific IgE with Vig r 1, Bet v 1, Gly m 4, and Pru av 1 was assessed by immunoblot inhibition. Expression of Vig r 1 during development of mungbean seedlings and under wounding stress was analysed by immunoblotting. The Vig r 1 double band was analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). RESULTS: All patients were sensitized to birch pollen and Bet v 1, 20% to Bet v 2, and 90% to Gly m 4. Seventy percent of the patients showed IgE binding to a double band at 15 kDa in mungbean extract that was inhibited after pre-incubation of sera with rBet v 1. PCR cloning revealed that the mungbean homologue of Bet v 1 had a molecular weight of 16.2 kDa, a calculated pI of 4.6% and 42.8% amino acid sequence identity with Bet v 1. MS analysis confirmed similarity of the double band with the deduced Vig r 1 sequence, but also indicated the existence of other Vig r 1 isoforms. ImmunoCAP analysis detected IgE against Vig r 1 in 80% of the sera. IgE binding to Vig r 1 was inhibited with Gly m 4 in six of six and with rPru av 1 in four of six patients. Vig r 1 expression occurred during development of seedlings and was increased by wounding stress. CONCLUSIONS: Food allergy to mungbean seedlings can be caused by primary sensitization to birch pollen and is mediated by Vig r 1 in the majority of the patients with birch pollen-related allergy to mungbean seedlings.     

Severe oral allergy syndrome and anaphylactic reactions caused by a Bet v 1- related PR-10 protein in soybean,SAM22

BACKGROUND: Anaphylactic reactions to soy products have been attributed to stable class 1 food allergens. OBJECTIVE: IgE- mediated reactions to a soy-containing dietary food product in patients allergic to birch pollen were investigated. METHODS: Detailed case histories were taken from 20 patients. Their sera were analyzed for IgE (UniCAP) specific for birch, grass, mugwort, the recombinant birch allergens rBet v 1 and rBet v2, and soy protein. Extracts from birch pollen, soy isolate, rBet v 1, and the recombinant PR-10 soy protein rSAM22 were coupled to paper disks or nitrocellulose for IgE measurements (enzyme allergosorbent test) or Western blot analysis. Enzyme allergosorbent testing, Western blot inhibition, and histamine release studies were performed with the same allergens. RESULTS: Most patients (17/20) experienced facial, oropharyngeal, and/or systemic allergic symptoms within 20 minutes after ingesting the soy product for the first time. Birch pollen allergy (16/20) was common, along with oral allergy syndrome to apple (12/20) or hazelnut (11/20). IgE levels to birch and Bet v 1 but not to other inhalants were high in 18 of 20 patients. Significant IgE binding to rSAM22 occurred in 17 of 20 patients. Blot experiments with the soy isolate revealed IgE-binding bands at 17 kd (15/20), 22 kd (1/20), and 35 to 38 kd (2/20); the former was inhibited by preincubation of the sera with rBet v 1 or rSAM22. Birch extract and soy isolate, rBet v 1, and rSAM22 induced dose-dependent histamine release in the nanomolar range. CONCLUSION: Immediate-type allergic symptoms in patients with birch pollen allergy after ingestion of soy protein-containing food items can result from cross-reactivity of Bet v 1 -specific IgE to homologous pathogenesis-related proteins, particularly the PR-10 protein SAM22.