Analysis of cross-resistance of the selective estrogen receptor modulators arzoxifene (LY353381) and LY117018 in tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer xenografts.

PURPOSE: Cross-resistance is the primary issue facing the evaluation of new antiestrogens to treat metastatic breast cancer because they may be tested, initially, in populations of patients that have failed long-term adjuvant tamoxifen (Tam) therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have tested the benzothiophene derivatives, arzoxifene (Arzox; LY353381) and LY117018 in two models of Tam-stimulated tumor growth derived from either MCF-7 (M. M. Gottardis and V. C. Jordan, Cancer Res., 48: 5183-5187, 1988) or T47D (J. MacGregor Schafer et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 4373-4380, 2000) breast cancer cells. RESULTS: Using the MCF-7:Tam model, we found that both Arzox and LY117018 (1.5 mg/day) resulted in tumor growth and, therefore, were partially cross-resistant with Tam. Next, using the T47D:17beta-estradiol (E(2)) model, we compared the antiestrogenic/antitumor properties of Arzox and LY117018 and determined that neither Arzox nor LY117018 caused T47D:E(2) tumor growth after 21 weeks. In addition, we determined that long-term treatment does not result in failure and subsequent development of transplantable Arzox- or LY117018-stimulated tumors. To establish whether Arzox and LY117018 are cross-resistant in T47D:Tam tumors, mice were treated with Arzox or LY117018 (1.5 mg/day), and, again, we found that neither resulted in the growth of transplantable tumors. Lastly, we showed that Arzox and LY117018 were only partially able to compete with postmenopausal E(2) (0.3 cm silastic capsule) in T47D:Tam tumors. However, when T47D:E(2) tumors were treated for 7 days instead of 5 days, both Arzox and LY117018 were more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Arzox is not cross-resistant with Tam in the T47D athymic mouse model but does exhibit cross-resistance in the MCF-7 model.     

The selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene and the rexinoid LG100268 cooperate to promote transforming growth factor beta-dependent apoptosis in breast cancer

We show that the selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene (Arz) and the rexinoid LG100268 (268) synergize to promote apoptosis in a rat model of estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma and in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells in culture. We also show that it is not necessary to administer Arz and 268 continuously during tumor progression to prevent cancer in the rat model because dosing of these drugs in combination for relatively short periods, each followed by drug-free rests, is highly effective. This new approach to chemoprevention uses high doses of drugs that are too toxic for long-term administration. However, when given for short periods, the agents are nontoxic and still induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. We also show that the ability of the two drugs to induce apoptosis is the combined result of induction of transforming growth factor beta by Arz, together with inhibition of the prosurvival nuclear factor kappaB and phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase signaling pathways by 268. The new protocol we have developed for chemoprevention allows the efficacious and safe administration of 268 and Arz, and these agents now should be considered for clinical use.     

Breast cancer chemoprevention phase I evaluation of biomarker modulation by arzoxifene, a third generation selective estrogen receptor modulator.

PURPOSE: Arzoxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator with strong breast antiestrogen activity and absence of uterine agonist activity, was explored as a potential chemoprevention agent. We performed a multi-institutional evaluation of arzoxifene in women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ or T1/T2 invasive cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a Phase IA trial, 50 pre- or postmenopausal women were randomized to 10, 20, or 50 mg of arzoxifene daily in the interval between biopsy and re-excision or were enrolled as no-treatment controls. In a Phase IB trial, 76 postmenopausal women were randomized to 20 mg of arzoxifene versus matched placebo. Serum specimens collected at entry and at re-excision were assayed for various hormones and growth factors. Tissue from biopsies (estrogen receptor + and/or progesterone receptor +) and re-excision specimens was evaluated immunohistochemically for proliferation (Ki-67 by MIB-1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and other biomarkers. RESULTS: In both trials, increases in serum sex hormone binding globulin were noted, as were decreases in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and the IGF-I:IGF binding protein-3 ratio (P < 0.007 versus control/placebo). For 45 evaluable women in Phase IA, decreases in proliferation indices were more prevalent for arzoxifene (particularly 20 mg) than for controls. For 58 evaluable women in Phase IB, a decrease in estrogen receptor expression for arzoxifene was observed compared with no change with placebo (P = 0.0068). However, decreases in proliferation indices for arzoxifene were not statistically different from placebo, perhaps due to a confounding effect of stopping hormone replacement therapy before entry. CONCLUSION: Given the favorable side effect profile and the biomarker modulations reported here, arzoxifene remains a reasonable candidate for additional study as a breast cancer chemoprevention agent.     

Arzoxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator for chemoprevention of experimental breast cancer.

Arzoxifene ([6-hydroxy-3-[4-[2-(1-piperidinyl)-ethoxy]phenoxy]-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)]benzo[b]thiophene) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is a potent estrogen antagonist in mammary and uterine tissue while acting as an estrogen agonist to maintain bone density and lower serum cholesterol. Arzoxifene is a highly effective agent for prevention of mammary cancer induced in the rat by the carcinogen nitrosomethylurea and is significantly more potent than raloxifene in this regard. Arzoxifene is devoid of the uterotrophic effects of tamoxifen, suggesting that, in contrast to tamoxifen, it is unlikely that the clinical use of arzoxifene will increase the risk of developing endometrial carcinoma.     

Selective estrogen receptor modulators as inhibitors of repopulation of human breast cancer cell lines after chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Repopulation of surviving tumor cells between courses of chemotherapy might lead to effective drug resistance. Here we study inhibition of repopulation of hormone-responsive human breast cancer cell lines by selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) during courses of chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Hormone responsive breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D, and the ER- cell line MDA-231, were treated with either 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (4OHT) or arzoxifene during weekly courses of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or methotrexate (MTX). Clonogenic assays were performed to determine the overall survival of tumor cells after treatment with the SERMs alone, after one to three doses of 5-FU or MTX alone, and after 5-FU or MTX followed by each of the SERMs. RESULTS: Both SERMs inhibited the growth of ER+ cells MCF-7 and T47D but had no effect on the ER-cell line MDA-231. Arzoxifene was more effective than 4OHT. Between courses of treatment with either 5-FU or MTX, repopulation of ER+ cells was specifically inhibited by the SERMs, whereas repopulation of ER- MDA-231 was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: Arzoxifene and 4OHT can inhibit specifically the repopulation of ER+ breast cancer cells between courses of chemotherapy. Scheduling of short-acting SERMs between courses of chemotherapy has the potential to improve therapeutic index.     

Prevention and treatment of experimental breast cancer with the combination of a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, arzoxifene, and a new rexinoid, LG 100268.

The selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene and the rexinoid LG 100268 were active not only as single agents for prevention and treatment of breast cancer in the rat model that uses nitrosomethylurea as the carcinogen but also showed striking synergy, both preventively and therapeutically, in a series of six experiments with a total of 465 rats. Mechanistic studies in cell culture reported here suggest that enhancement of stromal-epithelial interactions may contribute to this synergy. The possible clinical use of the combination of arzoxifene and LG 100268 for prevention of breast cancer in women at high risk, for treatment of women in the adjuvant setting, or for treatment of end-stage disease should now be considered.     

Comparison of the selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene (LY353381) with tamoxifen on tumor growth and biomarker expression in an MCF-7 human breast cancer xenograft model

Arzoxifene (ARZ) is a selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator with greater bioavailability than raloxifene which is being developed as treatment for breast cancer. We have used an in vivo model of hormone-sensitive breast cancer to study the growth-inhibitory and pharmacodynamic effects of ARZ in comparison with the most widely used antiestrogen, tamoxifen (TAM). We compared the abilities of ARZ and TAM to antagonize the estrogen (E2)-dependent growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer xenografts in oophorectomized athymic mice. At four different time points over 28 days, we studied their time-related pharmacodynamic effects on biomarkers of tumor growth (cell proliferation/death measured by Ki-67 and apoptosis scores), cell cycle activity (cyclin D1 and p27(kip1)), and hormone-regulated gene expression (ERalpha, progesterone receptor, and pS2). Although maximal growth inhibition was seen after E2 withdrawal, ARZ and TAM induced significant and similar inhibition of E2-stimulated tumor growth. Inhibition of growth was reflected by changes in the tumor growth index (ratio posttreatment/pretreatment Ki-67/apoptosis scores). ARZ and TAM resulted in a significant (P < 0.001) increase in ER expression and reduction in progesterone receptor expression, whereas changes in cyclin D1 score were inversely related to p27(kip1) score. A significant but delayed biological effect was observed with a 10-fold lower dose of ARZ. These results show that ARZ is an effective antagonist of E2-stimulated breast cancer growth with similar growth-inhibitory and pharmacodynamic effects to TAM in this model.     

The combination of the rexinoid, LG100268, and a selective estrogen receptor modulator, either arzoxifene or acolbifene, synergizes in the prevention and treatment of mammary tumors in an estrogen receptor-negative model of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We tested whether a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and a rexinoid are active for prevention and treatment in the mouse mammary tumor virus-neu mouse model of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: For prevention, mice were fed a powdered control diet, the SERM arzoxifene (Arz, 20 mg/kg diet), the rexinoid LG100268 (268, 30 mg/kg diet), or the combination for 60 weeks. In a second prevention study, mice were fed Arz (6 mg/kg diet), 268 (30 mg/kg diet), the combination of Arz and 268, the SERM acolbifene (Acol, 3 mg/kg diet), or the combination of Acol and 268 for 52 weeks. For the treatment studies, mice with tumors were fed combinations of a SERM and 268 for 4 weeks. RESULTS: The rexinoid 268 and the SERMs Arz and Acol, as individual drugs, delayed the development of estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Moreover, the combination of a SERM and 268 was strikingly synergistic, as no tumors developed in any mouse fed the combination of 268 and a SERM. Moreover, this drug combination also induced significant tumor regression when used therapeutically. These drugs did not inhibit transgene expression in vitro or in vivo, and the combination of Arz and 268 inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in the tumors. CONCLUSION: The combination of a rexinoid and SERM should be considered for future clinical trials.     

Phase I study of a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator, LY353381.HCL, in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted this phase I trial to determine the safety and toxicity profile of LY353381.HCl-a novel, potent, third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)-because this benzothiophene derivative demonstrated an SERM profile in preclinical studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 32 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated in four cohorts with oral daily doses of 10, 20, 50, and 100 mg. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during the first 72 hours following the first dose on day 1 and during the 24 hours after the day 57 dose. Eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2; no significant major organ dysfunction; and at least 3 weeks elapsed since most recent hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and estrogen replacement therapy. RESULTS: The median patient age was 56 years (range, 30 years to 76 years). The median number of prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease was one (range, zero to four), while the median number of prior hormone regimens for metastatic disease was two (range, zero to five). Receptor status was estrogen receptor (ER) positive and progesterone receptor (PR) positive, 19 patients; ER positive and PR negative, eight patients; ER positive and PR unknown, two patients; and ER and PR unknown, three patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Treatment was well tolerated with mild to moderate hot flashes in 18 of 32 patients (56%) at all dose levels. Transvaginal ultrasound performed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment showed no endometrial thickening. Of the 32 patients evaluable for response, six patients had stable disease for at least 6 months with a median duration of 7.7 months (range, 6.2 months to 33.8 months). The pharmacokinetics of LY353381.HCl were generally linear with respect to time and studied dose range. CONCLUSION: As predicted in preclinical testing, daily oral LY353381.HCl is safe, is well tolerated at all tested dose levels, and may be clinically beneficial in patients with extensively pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Further studies with LY353381 to evaluate the efficacy in patients with or without prior exposure to tamoxifen and fewer overall prior regimens are under way.     

Fulvestrant,a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator,sensitizes estrogen receptor negative breast tumors to chemotherapy

Drug resistance frequently results in poor prognosis and high 5-year recurrence rate in estrogen receptor-negative (ER−) breast cancer patients. Herein, we examined the reversal effects of fulvestrant on multidrug resistance (MDR) in ER− breast cancer cells. Co-administration of fulvestrant significantly sensitized ER− MDR tumors to paclitaxel both in vitro and in vivo. Further analyses indicated that fulvestrant did not affect P-gp expression, but could inhibit P-gp function and subsequently reverse P-gp mediated drug resistance in ER− breast cancer cells. These results showed that combination of fulvestrant and chemotherapeutic agents might provide an effective treatment for ER− MDR breast cancers.     

Selection of hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer with a cytoplasmic estrogen receptor assay. Analysis of 100 cases

One hundred women with advanced breast cancer were treated with endocrine therapy alone and the clinical response was correlated with the estrogen receptor status of the tumor as determined by a fluorescent histochemical assay designed to estimate the percentage of cancer cells with high cytoplasmic estrogen binding activity. Using clinical response rates as the standards for measurement, this histochemical method showed an 84% sensitivity, a 74% specificity, a 76% positive predictive value and an 82% negative predictive value. These results indicate that the histochemical assay may serve as a supplementary means to identify hormone-responsive mammary carcinomas and as a research tool to study the biology of this group of tumors.     

Relationship between estrogen receptor concentration and cytomorphometry in breast cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) concentration and cytomorphometric parameters in breast carcinoma. Primary breast cancer specimens were both imprinted on cytologic slides and submitted to ER determination with a dextran-coated charcoal method. Patients were stratified by ER levels ranging from 0 to greater than or equal to 200 fmol/mg protein. Measurements were performed on cytologic imprint technique smears in five cases from each ER strata, using a computer-assisted tracing device. Nuclear, cytoplasmic, and cellular parameters were measured on 50 cells per case. The cytometric findings were correlated with ER concentrations. A statistically significant correlation between decreasing area (P = 0.011), perimeter (P = 0.015), maximum diameter (P = 0.034), minimum diameter (P = 0.008), and volume (P = 0.01) of nuclei and increasing ER levels was found. With regard to whole cells, the following parameters significantly decreased versus increasing ER levels: area (P = 0.038), perimeter (P = 0.046), minimum diameter (P = 0.011), and volume (P = 0.044). A statistically significant relationship between the decreasing cytoplasmic perimeter (P = 0.025), i.e., nuclear plus cellular perimeter, and increasing ER content was found. Cytoplasmic area and nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio (N/C) did not correlate with the amount of ER. In all classes of different ER concentration, cells and nuclei displayed a regular shape closer to a circle than to an ellipse. The results of the current investigation indicate that tumors with higher ER concentration are composed of smaller cells with smaller nuclei than are tumors with lower ER content.     

Effects of the new selective estrogen receptor modulator LY353381.HCl (Arzoxifene) on human endometrial cancer growth in athymic mice.

PURPOSE: Arzoxifene (Arzox) is a novel benzothiophene analogue with selective estrogen receptor modulator activity similar to raloxifene. Arzox is being developed as a treatment for breast cancer and has a predominantly antiestrogenic effect on the rodent uterus. Our objectives were to verify whether the novel selective estrogen receptor modulator, Arzox, can be a good first-line agent and also be effective at controlling the growth of endometrial cancer after exposure to tamoxifen (Tam). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We compared the effects of Tam and Arzox on the growth of estrogen responsive ECC-1 endometrial cancer cells in vitro, and we determined their antitumor effects on ECC-1 and EnCa101 endometrial carcinoma growth in athymic mice. RESULTS: We observed that estrogen receptor protein expression is down-regulated by Arzox to the same extent as raloxifene, whereas 4-hydroxytamoxifen, the active metabolite of Tam, does not affect estrogen receptor protein levels. Tam and Arzox inhibit the growth of Tam-na?ve ECC-1 tumors in athymic mice. However when Tam-stimulated or estrogen-stimulated (which had been treated with Tam previously) EnCa101 endometrial tumors were treated with Tam or Arzox, we observed a stimulatory effect of both compounds in these models. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that Arzox may be a good first-line agent, but it may be ineffective at controlling the growth of endometrial cancer after exposure to Tam. Our data suggest that Arzox stimulates endometrial tumor growth to at least the same extent as Tam, thereby suggesting a limited role as a second-line agent for the patient on Tam who develops occult endometrial cancer.     

Effect of toxaphene on estrogen receptor functions in human breast cancer cells

Toxaphene (polychlorinated camphenes) is an insecticidal mixture of >670 chemicals, which was widely used until the mid 1980s. Due to their lipophilic and volatile nature, these chemicals accumulate in animal and human tissues and continue to be a major contaminant in marine and freshwater biota. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in mammalian test systems suggest that toxaphene is a carcinogen and reports support the hypothesis that toxaphene could have tumor-promoting potential in human breast tissue. In order to examine the potential of toxaphene as an environmental endocrine disrupter, we investigated its effect on the estrogen receptor (ER) function in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Using transient gene expression experiments, we observed approximately 60% and 80% inhibition of the constitutive and 17beta-estradiol induced ER-dependent transactivation, respectively. The involvement of the ER in the ability of toxaphene to block the estrogen action was verified by cotransfection studies in ER-negative MDA-MB-231 cells. The interference of toxaphene with the ER mediated responses was supported by a significant suppression of endogenously expressed pS2 RNA and decreased levels of secreted pS2 protein. These reproducible results indicate that toxaphene can disturb hormonal signals mediated by the ER and suggest that these environmental chemicals have potential endocrine disrupting activities which may affect the reproductive health and increase the risk of carcinogenesis.      

乳腺癌新辅助化疗对激素受体影响的实验研究

为了探讨新辅助化疗EC方案(表阿霉素100mg/m2,环磷酰胺600mg/m2)对雌激素受体/孕激素受体(ER/PR)表达程度和激素受体状态的影响。采用免疫组化法,检测新辅助化疗前后ER/PR表达程度和激素受体状态的变化。新辅助化疗组23例患者(61%)和非新辅助化疗组18例患者(47%)ER/PR表达程度不同,P=0·25。两组中都有2例(5%)患者出现激素受体状态的改变,P=0·99。ER/PR表达改变与月经状态,组织类型无关。初步研究结果提示,两组中5%患者出现激素受体状态的改变是由标本取样引起,治疗策略应以手术后大体病理的免疫组化为最后标准。