The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose and scanner manufacturer on quantitative CT scan measurements of lung morphology in smokers. METHODS: Low-dose and high-dose, inspiratory, multislice CT scans were obtained in 50 subjects at intervals of approximately 6 months (mean [+/- SD] interval, 0.5 +/- 0.2 years). In another 30 subjects, multislice CT scans were acquired first using a GE LightSpeed Ultra (General Electric Healthcare; Milwaukee, WI), followed a mean time of 1.2 +/- 0.4 years later by using a Siemens Sensation 16 scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions; Erlangen, Germany). Custom software was used to measure lung volume, mass, mean density, and the extent of emphysema using threshold cutoffs of -950, -910, and -856 Hounsfield units (HU) and the lowest 15th and 5th percentile points. RESULTS: The change in radiograph dose significantly affected measurements of emphysema assessed using mean lung density, threshold, or percentile methods. There were also interactions between dose and total lung volume for all of the measurements except the -950-HU threshold and the lowest fifth percentile point. These two emphysema measurements suggest that there was more emphysema found in the CT scans obtained using a lower radiograph dose. Only the mean lung density and -856-HU threshold showed significant effects between CT scanner manufacturers and interactions between total lung volume and scanner. All other measures of lung structure were not different between the two CT scanners. CONCLUSION: CT scan measurements of very low density lung structures are significantly affected by radiation dose but are less sensitive to the lung volume. Image acquisition parameters including radiation dose, scanner type, and the subject's breath size should be standardized to estimate emphysema severity in longitudinal studies.     

Preoperative severity of emphysema predictive of improvement after lung volume reduction surgery: use of CT morphometry

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine how the volume and severity of emphysema measured by CT morphometry (CTM) before and after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) relates to the functional status of patients after LVRS. DESIGN: A histologically validated CT algorithm was used to quantify the volume and severity of emphysema in 35 patients before and after LVRS: total lung volume (TLV), normal lung volume (< 6.0 mL gas per gram of tissue), volume of mild/moderate emphysema (ME; 6.0 to 10.2 mL gas per gram of tissue), volume of severe emphysema (> 10.2 mL gas per gram of tissue), surface area/volume (SA/V; meters squared per milliliter), and surface area (SA; meters squared). Outcome parameters included maximal cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) performance in 21 patients and routine pulmonary function in all patients. We hypothesized that baseline CTM parameters predict response to LVRS and that the change in these parameters may offer insight into mechanisms of improvement. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Thirty-five patients with severe emphysema who had successful LVRS. RESULTS: The significant decrease in TLV following LVRS was entirely accounted for by a decrease in severe emphysema. The SA/V and the SA both increased significantly following LVRS. The change in maximal CPX in watts following surgery correlated significantly with baseline values of severe emphysema (r = 0.60), which was collinear with TLV, and SA/V. The change in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide revealed a significant positive linear relationship with preoperative severe emphysema (r = 0.37) and a negative relationship with ME (r = -0.37). Change in watts revealed a strong relationship with changes in severe emphysema (r = -0.75) and weaker but significant relationships with change in TLV, ME, SA/V, and SA. Other measures of pulmonary function revealed significant albeit less dominant relationships with baseline CTM and change in these indexes. CONCLUSION: Using CTM, we have identified a close relationship between baseline severe emphysema, or change in severe emphysema, and the improvement in CPX after LVRS. These observations support a potential role of CTM in future clinical trials for predicting responders to LVRS and identifying mechanisms of improvement.     

Core to rind distribution of severe emphysema predicts outcome of lung volume reduction surgery.

Computed tomography (CT) has shown that emphysema is more extensive in the inner (core) region than in the outer (rind) region of the lung. It has been suggested that the concentration of emphysematous lesions in the outer rind leads to a better outcome following lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) because these regions tend to be more surgically accessible. The present study used a recently described, computer-based CT scan analysis to quantify severe emphysema (lung inflation > 10.2 ml gas/g tissue), mild/moderate emphysema (lung inflation = 10.2 to 6.0 ml gas/g tissue), and normal lung tissue (lung inflation < 6.0 ml gas/g tissue) present in the core and rind of the lung in 21 LVRS patients. The results show that the quantification of severe emphysema independently predicts change in maximal exercise response and FEV(1). We conclude that a greater extent of severe emphysema in the rind of the upper lung predicts greater benefit from LVRS because it identifies the lesions most accessible to removal by LVRS.     

Effects of emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery on transdiaphragmatic pressure and diaphragm length

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on diaphragm length (Ldi) and its capacity to generate transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial with a parallel group design. SETTING: Laboratory investigations in normal volunteers recruited by advertisement and in emphysema outpatients being evaluated for elective LVRS. STUDY POPULATION: Thirteen normal subjects and 13 emphysema patients matched for age and sex. Six emphysema patients underwent LVRS. MEASUREMENTS: Ldi and maximal Pdi during static inspiratory efforts (PdiMax) were measured at three different lung volumes (LVs). Pdi during maximal bilateral phrenic nerve twitch stimulation (PdiTw) was measured at functional residual capacity (FRC). All measurements were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Ldi, PdiMax, and PdiTw were lower in emphysema patients than in normal subjects at their respective LVs. PdiMax and PdiTw at FRC returned within the normal range after LVRS in emphysema patients. The relationships between PdiMax and LV or Ldi were shifted respectively to higher LV and shorter Ldi in emphysema patients relative to normal subjects, both before and after LVRS. LVRS effected craniad displacement of the diaphragm but no change in rib cage dimensions. Improvements in dyspnea and quality of life after LVRS correlated with changes in LV and Ldi but not with changes in airway caliber. CONCLUSION: Adaptive mechanisms, consistent with sarcomere deletion, tend to restore diaphragm strength in emphysema patients at FRC, which are fully expressed after LVRS. Lung remodeling by LVRS may alter pleural surface pressure distribution, causing a sustained change in chest wall shape.     

Radiographic evaluation of the potential lung volume reduction surgery candidate

Delineating the extent and distribution of emphysema is an essential component of the evaluation of candidates for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Imaging also may identify contraindications to LVRS, including bronchiectasis and pleural scarring. The chest X-ray is of limited utility in LVRS evaluation. Chest computed tomography (CT) scanning is an essential component of the evaluation, demonstrating the presence of emphysema and its amount and distribution. Clinical experience has shown that a substantial minority of chest CT scans will also demonstrate pulmonary nodules, some of which represent lung cancers. Published series, including the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, consistently demonstrate that patients with upper lobe predominant or heterogeneous emphysema are most likely to benefit from LVRS. Heterogeneity and distribution can also be assessed by radionuclide ventilation perfusion scanning, but this modality adds little additional information to CT scanning.     

Computed tomography-quantified emphysema distribution is associated with lung function decline

Emphysema distribution is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is, however, unknown whether computed tomography (CT)-quantified emphysema distribution (upper/lower lobe) is associated with lung function decline in heavy (former) smokers. 587 male participants underwent lung CT and pulmonary function testing at baseline and after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.9 (2.8-3.0) yrs. The lungs were automatically segmented based on anatomically defined lung lobes. Severity of emphysema was automatically quantified per anatomical lung lobe and was expressed as the 15th percentile (Hounsfield unit point below which 15% of the low-attenuation voxels are distributed (Perc15)). The CT-quantified emphysema distribution was based on principal component analysis. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association of emphysema distribution with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV(1) and FVC decline. Mean±sd age was 60.2±5.4 yrs, mean baseline FEV(1)/FVC was 71.6±9.0% and overall mean Perc15 was -908.5±20.9 HU. Participants with upper lobe-predominant CT-quantified emphysema had a lower FEV(1)/FVC, FEV(1) and FVC after follow-up compared with participants with lower lobe-predominant CT-quantified emphysema (p=0.001), independent of the total extent of CT-quantified emphysema. Heavy (former) smokers with upper lobe-predominant CT-quantified emphysema have a more rapid decrease in lung function than those with lower lobe-predominant CT-quantified emphysema.     

Lung CT density correlates with measurements of airflow limitation and the diffusing capacity

We studied 80 subjects (63 M, 17 F; 23-82 yrs) and related lung computerized tomography (CT) density with age, height, spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity and arterial blood gas tensions. These subjects demonstrated a wide range of physiological impairment (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 8-116% predicted; diffusing capacity (Kco) 15-139% predicted; arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) 38-91 mmHg). They ranged from normal subjects to patients with chronic respiratory failure. Lung density was derived from CT density histograms measured as both mean Emergency Medical Information (EMI) number (EMI scale: 0 = water, -500 = air, EMI number of normal lung tissue range approximately -200 to -450) and the lowest 5th percentile EMI number, the latter value being more likely to represent the density of lung parenchyma. Lung CT density correlated most strongly with airflow obstruction (EMI 5th percentile versus FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, r = 0.73, p less than 0.001) and diffusing capacity (EMI 5th percentile versus Kco, r = 0.77, p less than 0.001). This suggests that reduction in lung density, which reflects loss of the surface area of the distal airspaces, is a major index of respiratory function in patients with smoking related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These data provide no indication of other factors such as small and large airways disease, and loss of elastic recoil, which may contribute to airflow limitation, or disruption of the pulmonary vascular bed which may also affect CT lung density.     

Relationship between extent of pulmonary emphysema by high-resolution computed tomography and lung elastic recoil in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

We investigated the relationship between the extent of pulmonary emphysema, assessed by quantitative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and lung mechanics in 24 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The extent of emphysema was quantified as the relative lung area with CT numbers < -950 Hounsfield Units (HU). Patients with COPD had severe airflow obstruction (FEV(1) 35 +/- 15% pred) and severe reduction of CO diffusion constant (DCO/VA 37 +/- 19% pred). Maximal static elastic recoil pressure (Pst(max)) averaged 54 +/- 24% predicted, and the exponential constant K of pressure-volume curves was 258 +/- 116% predicted. Relative lung area with CT numbers < -950 HU averaged 21 +/- 11% (range 1 to 38%). It showed a highly significant negative correlation with DCO/VA (r = -0.84, p < 0.0001), a weak correlation with FEV(1)% predicted, and no correlation with either Pst(max) or constant K. A significant relationship was found between the natural logarithm of K and the full width at half maximum of the frequency distribution of CT numbers, taken as an index of the heterogeneity of lung density (r = 0.68, p < 0.0005). We conclude that currently used methods of assessing the extent of emphysema by HRCT closely reflect the reduction of CO diffusion constant, but cannot predict the elastic properties of the lung tissue.     

Lung volume reduction surgery as a bridge to lung transplantation

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with advanced emphysema. In some patients with emphysema who are candidates for lung transplantation, LVRS is an alternative treatment option to lung transplantation, or may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Generally accepted criteria for LVRS include severe non-reversible airflow obstruction due to emphysema associated with significant evidence of lung hyperinflation and air trapping. Both high resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and quantitative ventilation/perfusion scan are used to identify lung regions with severe emphysema which would be used as targets for lung resection. Bilateral LVRS is the preferred surgical approach compared with the unilateral procedure because of better functional outcome. Lung transplantation is the preferred surgical treatment in patients with emphysema with alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency and in patients with very severe disease who have homogeneous emphysema pattern on CT scan of the chest or very low diffusion capacity.     

Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Current data for patients > 2 years after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is limited. This prospective study evaluates pre-LVRS baseline data and provides long-term results in 26 patients. INTERVENTION: Bilateral targeted upper lobe stapled LVRS using video thoracoscopy was performed in 26 symptomatic patients (18 men) aged 67 +/- 6 years (mean +/- SD) with severe and heterogenous distribution of emphysema on lung CT. Lung function studies were measured before and up to 4 years after LVRS unless death intervened. RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow-up. Baseline FEV(1) was 0.7 +/- 0.2 L, 29 +/- 10% predicted; FVC, 2.1 +/- 0.6 L, 58 +/- 14% predicted (mean +/- SD); maximum oxygen consumption, 5.7 +/- 3.8 mL/min/kg (normal, > 18 mL/min/kg); dyspneic class > or = 3 (able to walk < or = 100 yards) and oxygen dependence part- or full-time in 18 patients. Following LVRS, mortality due to respiratory failure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 4%, 19%, 31%, and 46%, respectively. At 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after LVRS, an increase above baseline for FEV(1) > 200 mL and/or FVC > 400 mL was noted in 73%, 46%, 35%, and 27% of patients, respectively; a decrease in dyspnea grade > or = 1 in 88%, 69%, 46%, and 27% of patients, respectively; and elimination of oxygen dependence in 78%, 50%, 33%, and 22% of patients, respectively. The mechanism for expiratory airflow improvement was accounted for by the increase in both lung elastic recoil and small airway intraluminal caliber and reduction in hyperinflation. Only FVC and vital capacity (VC) of all preoperative lung function studies could identify the 9 patients with significant physiologic improvement at > 3 years after LVRS, respectively, from 10 patients who responded < or = 2 years and died within 4 years (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral LVRS provides clinical and physiologic improvement for > 3 years in 9 of 26 patients with emphysema primarily due to both increased lung elastic recoil and small airway caliber and decreased hyperinflation. The 9 patients had VC and FVC greater at baseline (p < 0.01) when compared to 10 short-term responders who died < 4 years after LVRS.     

Interactions of regional respiratory mechanics and pulmonary ventilatory impairment in pulmonary emphysema: assessment with dynamic MRI and xenon-133 single-photon emission CT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Dynamic MRI and (133)Xe single-photon emission CT (SPECT) were used to directly evaluate the interaction of regional respiratory mechanics and lung ventilatory function in pulmonary emphysema. METHODS: Respiratory diaphragmatic and chest wall (D/CW) motions were analyzed by sequential MRI of fast-gradient echo pulse sequences during two to three respiratory cycles in 28 patients with pulmonary emphysema, including 9 patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). The extent of air trapping in the regional lung was quantified by the (133)Xe retention index (RI) on three-dimensional (133)Xe SPECT displays. RESULTS: By contrast to healthy subjects (n = 6) with regular, synchronous D/CW motions, pulmonary emphysema patients showed reduced, irregular, or asynchronous motions in the hemithorax or location with greater (133)Xe retention, with significant decreases in the maximal amplitude of D/CW motions (MADM and MACWM; p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). The removal of (133)Xe retention sites by LVRS effectively and regionally improved D/CW motions in nine patients, with significant increases in MADM and MACWM (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). In a total of 40 studies of the 28 patients including post-LVRS studies, normalized MADM and MACWM correlated with percent predicted FEV(1) (r = 0.881, p < 0.0001; and r = 0.906, p < 0.0001, respectively), and also with (133)Xe RI in each hemithorax (r = -0.871, p < 0 0.0001; and r = -0.901, p < 0 0.0001, respectively.) CONCLUSIONS: This direct comparison of regional respiratory mechanics with lung ventilation demonstrated a close interaction between these impairments in pulmonary emphysema. The present techniques provide additional sensitivity for evaluating pathophysiologic compromises in pulmonary emphysema, and may also be useful for selecting resection targets for LVRS and for monitoring the effects.     

Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been proposed for patients with severe emphysema to improve dyspnoea and pulmonary function. It is unknown, however, whether prognosis and pulmonary function in these patients can be improved compared to conservative treatment. The effect of LVRS and conservative therapy were compared prospectively in 57 patients with emphysema, who fulfilled the standard criteria for LVRS. The patients were divided into two groups according to their own decision. Patients in group 1 (n=29, eight females, mean+/-SEM 58.8+/-1.7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 27.6+/-1.3% of the predicted value) underwent LVRS. Patients in group 2 (n=28, five females, 58.5+/-1.8 yrs, FEV1 30.8+/-1.4% pred) preferred to postpone LVRS. There were no significant differences in lung function between the two groups at baseline; however, there was a tendency towards better functional status in the control group. The control group had a better modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea score (3.1+/-0.15 versus 3.5+/-0.1, p<0.04). Model-based comparisons were used to estimate the differences between the two groups over 18 months. Significant improvements were observed in the LVRS group compared to the control group in FEV1, total lung capacity (TLC), Residual volume (RV), MMRC dyspnea score and 6-min walking distance on all follow up visits. The estimated difference in FEV1 was 33% (95% confidence interval 13-58%; p>0.0001), in TLC 12.9% (7.9-18.8%; p>0.0001), in RV 60.9% 32.6-89.2%; p>0.0001), in 6-min walking distance 230 m (138-322 m; p<0.002) and in MMRC dyspnoea score 1.17 (0.79-1.55; p<0.0001). In conclusion, lung volume reduction surgery is more effective than conservative treatment for the improvement of dyspnoea, lung function and exercise capacity in selected patients with severe emphysema.     

Improved quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves dyspnoea, pulmonary function, and physical performance in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. This study investigated the impact of LVRS on health-related quality of life (HRQL) over a 2-yr period following surgery. Thirty-nine consecutive patients were prospectively assessed before LVRS, and followed over 24 months postoperatively. The assessments included pulmonary function, dyspnoea (Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score), 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and HRQL using the Short Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36). Several domains of SF-36 improved considerably over 2 yrs after surgery: Physical Functioning: 39 +/- 4 (mean +/- SEM) versus 16 +/- 2 (p<0.01); Vitality: 51 +/- 3 versus 32 +/- 3 (p<0.01); Social Functioning: 72 +/- 4 versus 51 +/- 5 (p<0.01). Also, improvements in pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 27 +/- 1% predicted, residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC): 0.65 +/- 0.01), 6 MWD (274 +/- 16 m) and dyspnoea (MRC: 3.9 +/- 01) were sustained for up to 2 yrs after LVRS (FEV1 36 +/- 2% pred, RV/TLC: 0.58 +/- 0.02; 6 MWD: 342 +/- 19 m; MRC: 2.0 +/- 0.2; p<0.05). In patients with severe emphysema, lung volume reduction surgery had positive effects on health-related quality of life and pulmonary function over 2 yrs.     

Weight gain after lung volume reduction surgery is not correlated with improvement in pulmonary mechanics

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Malnutrition and low body weight are common in patients with emphysema. Previous work has demonstrated correlation between severity of airflow obstruction and body weight. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a recent advance in the treatment of patients with severe emphysema that results in improved pulmonary function. We formed the hypothesis that improved lung mechanics after LVRS would result in body weight gain. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent bilateral LVRS for severe emphysema at the University of Michigan between January 1995 and April 1996 were eligible for the study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary function and body weight were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively for patients who underwent bilateral LVRS between January 1995 and April 1996. The average weight gain in 38 patients returning for 12 months of follow-up was 3.8 +/- 0.9 kg, or 6.2% of the preoperative weight. Women gained significantly more weight than men (9.2 vs 2.2%, respectively) at 1 year. Interestingly, there was no correlation between change in weight and postoperative change in FEV(1), FVC, residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), or RV/TLC at 12 months. However, there was a statistically significant correlation between weight gained and improvement in diffusion of carbon monoxide measured 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with severe emphysema gain weight after LVRS. These changes were independent of changes in pulmonary mechanics but may be a result of improved gas exchange. These findings provide further information about benefits of LVRS in patients with advance emphysema that are beyond simple changes in pulmonary function.     

Paired inspiratory/expiratory volumetric thin-slice CT scan for emphysema analysis: comparison of different quantitative evaluations and pulmonary function test

PURPOSES: The aim of the study was to use three-dimensional high-resolution CT scan data sets in inspiration and expiration for the quantitative evaluation of emphysema. Using an advanced dedicated semiautomatic analysis tool, the functional inspiratory/expiratory shifts of emphysema volume and clusters were quantified. The pulmonary function test (PFT) served as the clinical "gold standard." MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (9 women and 22 men; mean [+/- SD] age, 60 +/- 8 years) who had severe emphysema due to COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] class III and IV) were included in the study. All patients underwent paired inspiratory/expiratory multidetector CT scans (slice thickness, 1/0.8 mm) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). CT scan data were analyzed with self-written emphysema detection solftware. It provides lung volume (LV), emphysema volume (EV), emphysema index (EI), and four clusters of emphysema with different volumes (from 2, 8, 65, and 120 mm(3)). These results were correlated with total lung capacity (TLC), intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV), and residual volume (RV) derived from PFT results. RESULTS: Inspiratory LV correlated with TLC (r = 0.9), expiratory LV with ITGV (r = 0.87), and RV (r = 0.83). Expiratory EV correlated better with ITGV (r = 0.88) and RV (r = 0.93) than with inspiratory EV (r = 0.83 and 0.88, respectively). The mean inspiratory EI was 54 +/- 13%, and it decreased to 43 +/- 15% in expiration. However, the individuals showed a broad spectrum of changes of EI (mean, 11%; range, 1 to 28%), and no differences in inspiratory/expiratory EI and changes in EI or LV were found between GOLD III and GOLD IV patients. In expiration, there was a change from the large emphysema cluster (-37%) to the intermediate cluster (+15%) and small cluster (+13% and +11%, respectively). The change of volume of the large emphysema cluster after expiration correlated well with the changes in LV (r = 0.9), EV (r = 0.99), EI (r = 0.85), and MLD (r = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Emphysema volumes measured from expiratory MDCT scans better reflect PFT abnormalities in patients with severe emphysema than those from inspiratory scans. Volumetric cluster analysis provided deeper insights into the local hyperinflation and expiratory obstruction of large emphysematous clusters.     

Quantitative Emphysema Distribution in Anatomic and Non-anatomic Lung Regions

Purpose: The change of emphysema distribution with increasing COPD severity is not yet assessed. Especially, involvement of the upper aspect of the lower lobe is unknown. The primary aim was to quantitatively determine regional distribution of emphysema in anatomically (lung lobes) and non-anatomically defined lung regions (upper/lower lung halves as well as core and rind regions) in a cohort covering equally all COPD severity stages using CT. Material and methods: Basically 100 CT data sets were quantitatively evaluated for regional distribution of emphysema. Emphysema characteristics (emphysema index, mean lung density and 15th percentile of the attenuation values of lung voxels) were compared (t-test) in: upper lobes vs. upper halves, lower lobes vs. lower halves, core vs. rind region. Results: In patients with ≤ GOLD II, a significantly higher emphysema burden was found in the upper lobes as compared to upper halves. In subjects with GOLD III/IV the differences were not significant for all emphysema characteristics. A high difference between lobes and halves in subjects with ≤ GOLD II was found, in contrast to low difference in higher GOLD stages. Conclusions: Lobar segmentation provides improved characterization of cranio-caudal emphysema distribution compared to a non-anatomic approach in subjects up to GOLD stage II.     

Lung density and lung mass in emphysema.

Mean lung density (dm) and radiologic (VLx) lung volume can be calculated using CT scan data. As many emphysematous patients are overdistended, the analysis of dm alone could be meaningless. However, lung mass (m) can be calculated as the product of dm and VLx. Twenty-four patients suspected of mild or severe emphysema as judged by roentgenographic and physiologic examinations as well as 16 healthy subjects were included in the protocol. They all underwent both a CT scan of the whole lung and functional tests from which the following were derived: airway resistance, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), total lung capacity (TLC), CO transfer capacity, quasi-static compliance at functional residual capacity (FRC), and blood gases. All CT scans were performed at the FRC of each patient. The dm was lower in emphysema patients than in healthy subjects, as m was greater in patients than in healthy subjects; 1,303 +/- 398 g and 997 +/- 133 g, respectively. Although dm values were significantly correlated to FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and TLC, m values were not correlated to any of these functional indices. Unexpectedly, these results show that most patients (22/24) with emphysema have a normal or increased lung mass. Normal or above normal m values might be due to oversecretion in some patients. Nevertheless, the synthesis of new tissue due to chronic inflammation is the most likely explanation that could account for this finding.     

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema on diaphragm dimensions and configuration

Part of the functional benefit provided by lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) may be related to improvement in respiratory muscle function resulting from changes in diaphragm dimension and configuration. To study these changes, we obtained 3D reconstructions of the muscle using spiral computed tomography in 11 patients with severe emphysema before and 3 mo after surgery, and in 11 normal subjects matched for sex, age, height, and weight. Bilateral LVRS was performed by thoracoscopy in eight patients and by sternotomy in three patients. Acquisitions were made in the supine posture at relaxed FRC, midinspiratory capacity, and TLC. On average, LVRS produced a 51 +/- 11% increase in FEV(1) and a 30 +/- 4% decrease in FRC. The total surface area of the diaphragm (A(di)) and of the zone of apposition (A(ap)) at FRC increased by 17 +/- 4% and 43 +/- 8%, respectively, but the surface area of the dome did not change. Compared with the values recorded in the normal subjects, postoperative values of A(di) and A(ap) at FRC were reduced by 11% (p < 0.05) and 24% (p < 0.005), respectively. The curvature of the dome increased at TLC in the left sagittal plane, but was otherwise unaffected by the procedure. We conclude that LVRS substantially increases A(di) and A(ap), but does not significantly improve diaphragm configuration at FRC.     

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery on sleep quality and nocturnal gas exchange in patients with severe emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that associated with improvements in respiratory mechanics, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) would result in an improvement in both sleep quality and nocturnal oxygenation in patients with severe emphysema. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients (10 men, 63 +/- 6 years [+/- SD]) with severe airflow limitation (FEV(1), 28 +/- 10% predicted) and hyperinflation (total lung capacity, 123 +/- 14% predicted) who were part of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial.Interventions and measurements: Patients completed 6 to 10 weeks of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation. Spirometry, measurement of lung volumes, arterial blood gas analysis, and polysomnography were performed prior to randomization and again 6 months after therapy. Ten patients underwent LVRS and optimal medical therapy, while 6 patients received optimal medical therapy only. RESULTS: Total sleep time and sleep efficiency improved following LVRS (from 184 +/- 111 to 272 +/- 126 min [p = 0.007], and from 45 +/- 26 to 61 +/- 26% [p = 0.01], respectively), while there was no change with medical therapy alone (236 +/- 75 to 211 +/- 125 min [p = 0.8], and from 60 +/- 18 to 52 +/- 17% [p = 0.5], respectively). The mean and lowest oxygen saturation during the night improved with LVRS (from 90 +/- 7 to 93 +/- 4% [p = 0.05], and from 83 +/- 10 to 86 +/- 10% [p = 0.03], respectively), while no change was noted in the medical therapy group (from 91 +/- 5 to 91 +/- 5 [p = 1.0], and from 84 +/- 5 to 82 +/- 6% [p = 0.3], respectively). There was a correlation between the change in FEV(1) and change in the lowest oxygen saturation during the night (r = 0.6, p = 0.02). In addition, there was an inverse correlation between the change in the lowest oxygen saturation during the night and the change in residual volume (- r = 0.5, p = 0.04) and functional residual capacity (- r = 0.6, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients with severe emphysema, LVRS, but not continued optimal medical therapy, results in improved sleep quality and nocturnal oxygenation. Improvements in nocturnal oxygenation correlate with improved airflow and a decrease in hyperinflation and air trapping.     

Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on bony thorax configuration in severe COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hyperinflation in patients with severe COPD is associated with an increased anteroposterior (AP) rib cage diameter. We sought to determine whether bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) affects bony thorax configuration. DESIGN: Prospective of clinical data collection before and after LVRS. SETTING: Tertiary-care university medical center. PATIENTS: We measured multiple AP and transverse thoracic diameters, by using plain chest roentgenograms (CXRs) in 25 patients (11 men, 14 women), and thoracic CT scans in 14 patients (7 men, 7 women), preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A subgroup of 7 patients (reference data) also had CXR thoracic diameter measurements made, using films obtained previously within a year of their presurgical evaluation. Another subgroup of 10 patients had CT scan measurements also made 12 months postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: CXR dimensions were taken at the level of the manubrium sterni (M) and thoracic T7 and T11 levels. CT dimensions were taken at T4, T6, T8, and T10 levels. At each level, left (L), midsagittal (C), and right (R) AP and maximal transverse diameters were measured. The sum of the three AP diameters (Total) was used for calculations. Patients also underwent tests such as spirometry, lung volumes, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and transdiaphragmatic pressures during maximum static inspiratory efforts (Pdimax sniff) measured before and 3 months after LVRS. Patients were (mean +/- SD) 58+/-8 years old, with severe COPD and hyperinflation (FEV1, 0.68+/-0.23 L; FVC, 2.56+/-7.3 L; and total lung capacity [TLC], 143+/-22% predicted). After LVRS, AP diameters were reduced at thoracic level T7 (from 24.2+/-2.0 cm to 23.3+/-2.2 cm, p = 0.0002), and transverse diameters were reduced at T7 (from 26.8+/-1.9 cm to 26.4+/-1.7 cm, p = 0.001) and T11 (from 29.9+/-2.2 cm to 29.5+/-2.2 cm, p = 0.03), as measured using the CXR. In contrast, thoracic diameters were similar in subjects with CXRs before LVRS and within 1 year before evaluation. CT-measured AP diameters were significantly reduced 3 months after LVRS at T6, (from 48.8+/-6.0 cm to 46.7+/-5.4 cm, p = 0.02), T8 (from 54.2+/-7.0 cm to 52.3+/-6.5 cm, p = 0.004), and T10 (from 53.8+/-7.5 cm to 51.2+/-8.0 cm, p = 0.001), but not at T4. These AP diameter reductions directly correlated with the postoperative reductions in TLC and residual volume, and also with the increases in Pdimax sniff and 6MWD after LVRS. The reduction in AP diameters at thoracic levels T8 and T10 seen 3 months after LVRS remained stable at 12-month follow-up, whereas those measured at T6 lost statistical significance. CT-measured transverse diameters were unchanged at all levels after LVRS. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that LVRS decreases mid-to-lower AP rib cage diameter as assessed by CXR and thoracic CT. Although transverse diameters were reduced on CXR, the magnitude was small and was not confirmed with CT. After LVRS, AP diameter reductions are most likely the result of reduction in lung volume, and they are associated with improvements in diaphragm strength and exercise endurance.