The usefulness of a modified adult protocol for the clearance of paediatric cervical spine injury in the emergency department

Objective: To determine if the use of a modified adult protocol that uses cervical spine imaging on presentation for the assessment of cervical spine injury in children improves clinical outcome. Methods: This is a case series study on all consecutive trauma patients presenting from April to July 2000 inclusive to the ED of a major paediatric trauma hospital. Children presenting to the ED with potential cervical spine injury (CSI) were identified using standard selection criteria. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, method and time of presentation, associated injuries, radiological investigation and clinical outcome were recorded. The major outcome measures for this study were: time to clearance of the cervical spine, length of stay in the ED and admission to an in‐hospital bed. Data were analysed for compliance to the protocol, this being the standard assessment pathway of cervical spine clearance used by our trauma service. Results: The trauma registry identified 1721 trauma presentations during the 4‐month study period; 208 presentations representing 200 children with potential CSI were entered into the study. Males represented 72.5% of the study population, having a mean age of 8.32 years, although 29% were less than 5 years of age. The majority of presentations (69%) occurred outside of normal working hours. In 17.8% of cases the cervical spine was cleared based on clinical assessment alone, half less than 5 years of age. Compliance to the protocol occurred in 78% of presentations. However, when examined by age group, children 5 years of age or above were 1.5 times more likely to comply with the protocol as compared with younger children. Adequate plain imaging was not obtained in 18% of presentations, this group almost exclusively less than 5 years of age. There were no missed injuries and no short or long‐term neurological sequelae reported during this study. There were no differences in time to clearance, length of stay and admission rate between compliant and non‐compliant groups. Conclusions: Modified adult protocols for cervical spine clearance offer guidance in managing the majority of children suffering blunt trauma. However, we recommend caution in rigidly applying such protocols, especially to children of young age.     

Airway control in trauma patients with cervical spine fractures

INTRODUCTION: Proper airway control in trauma patients who have sustained cervical spine fracture remains controversial. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to survey the preferred methods of airway management in cervical spine fracture (CSF) patients, to evaluate the experience of handling such patients at a level-I trauma center, and to contrast the findings with recommendations of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. HYPOTHESIS: The methods used for control of the airway in patients with fractures of their cervical spine support the recommendation of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts: 1) a survey; and 2) a retrospective study. Survey questionnaires were sent to 199 members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and to 161 anesthesiology training programs throughout the United States. Three resuscitation scenarios were posed: 1) Elective airway--CSF--breathing spontaneously, stable vital signs; 2) Urgent airway--CSF--breathing spontaneously, unstable vital signs; and 3) Emergent airway--CSF--apneic, unstable. In addition, a three-year retrospective study was conducted at a level-I trauma center to determine the method of airway control in patients with cervical spine fractures. RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaires were received from 101 trauma surgeons (TS) and 58 anesthesiologists (ANESTH). Respondents indicated their preference of airway methods: Elective airway: Nasotracheal intubation: TS 69%, ANESTH 53%. Orotracheal intubation: TS and ANESTH 27%. Surgical airway: TS 4%. Intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB): ANESTH 20%. Urgent airway: Nasotracheal intubation: TS 48%, ANESTH 38%. Orotracheal intubation: TS 47%, ANESTH 45%. Surgical airway: TS 4%. FOB: ANESTH 16%. Emergent airway: Orotracheal intubation: TS 81%, ANESTH 78%. Surgical Airway: TS 19%, ANESTH 7%. FOB: ANESTH 15%. The retrospective review at the trauma center indicated that 102 patients with CSF were admitted; 62 required intubation: four (6%) on the scene, seven (11%) en route, five (8%) in the emergency department, 42 (67%) in the operating room, and four (6%) on the general surgery floor. Airway control methods used were nasotracheal: 14 (22%); orotracheal: 27 (43%); FOB: 17 (27%); tracheostomy: one (2%); unknown: three (4%). No progression of the neurological status resulted from intubation. CONCLUSION: The choice of airway control in the trauma patient with CSF differs between anesthesiologists and surgeons. However, the method selected does not have an adverse affect on neurological status as long as in-line stabilization is maintained. The methods available are safe, effective, and acceptable. The recommendations of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma for airway control with suspected cervical spine injury are useful. The technique utilized is dependent upon the judgment and experience of the intubator.     

Cervical spine injuries in blunt trauma patients requiring emergent endotracheal intubation.

Airway management in the blunt trauma patient is complicated by the potential for causing or exacerbating an injury to the cervical cord if an unstable cervical fracture is present. The records of 987 blunt trauma patients who required emergent endotracheal intubation over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence and type of cervical spine injury and the incidence of injury based on airway management. Sixty of the patients (6.1%) had a cervical fracture; 53 were potentially unstable injuries by radiographic criteria. Twenty patients had neurologic deficits prior to intubation. Twenty-six patients with unstable injuries were intubated orally, 25 nasally, and two by cricothyrotomy. One patient developed a neurologic deficit after nasotracheal intubation. Because of a possible selection bias in which severely injured patients were preferentially referred to this trauma center, the true incidence of cervical spine injuries may be lower than the 6.1% we found. The authors conclude that the incidence of serious cervical spine injury in a very severely injured population of blunt trauma patients is relatively low, and that commonly used methods of precautionary airway management rarely lead to neurologic deterioration.     

C OMPARISON OF T IMES TO I NTUBATE A S IMULATED T RAUMA P ATIENT IN T WO P OSITIONS

Background. The nature of the trauma patient's injuries may compromise the airway and ultimately lead to death or neurological devastation. The same injuries complicate protecting the airway in these patients by preventing manipulation of the cervical spine for direct laryngoscopy. A recent study has shown that misplaced endotracheal tubes occur significantly more often in trauma patients than in medical patients. Objectives. The authors hypothesized that elevating the long spine board would reduce the amount of time required for paramedics to intubate a simulated trauma patient. Methods. Paramedics from an urban emergency medical services division were given up to two opportunities to intubate a manikin in a type I ambulance in each of two positions in random order: supine and with the head elevated. The manikin was secured to a long spine board with three straps, a semi-rigid cervical collar, and a cervical immobilization device. An investigator maintained cervical spine alignment and provided cricoid pressure. The elevated position was accomplished by raising the head of the stretcher 27°, resulting in 7° of spine board elevation. Each attempt was timed. If the first attempt was unsuccessful, the times for both the first and second attempts were totaled to determine the total time required for intubation. Times for successful intubation in each position were compared with a Mann-Whitney test. First-attempt success rates for each position were compared with χ² analysis. Multinomial regression was used to determine whether experience, paramedic height, or previous intubation success influenced intubation time in either position. Results. Fifty-five paramedics provided informed consent and completed the study. Average time to intubate the supine manikin was significantly longer than needed to intubate the head-elevated manikin (35.6 ± 19.0 seconds vs 27.9 ± 12.8 seconds, p = 0.025). The manikin was successfully intubated on the first attempt 84% in the supine position and 95% in the head-elevated position (p = 0.200). Regression analysis identified intubation position as the only significant predictor of intubation time (p = 0.007). Conclusions. Modest elevation of the head of an immobilized patient appears to allow more rapid intubation. With the spine board properly secured to the stretcher, this technique potentially offers improved intubation time without additional cost or equipment.     

Delayed Diagnosis of Thoracolumbar Fractures in Multiple-trauma Patients

Objectives: To determine the frequency of delayed diagnosis of major thoracolumbar vertebral fractures (T-L Fxs) in ED multiple-trauma patients, and to determine the differences between cases of delayed and nondelayed diagnoses of T-L Fx. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 181 trauma patients with 310 major T-L Fxs (compression, burst, or chance Fxs or dislocations). Data collected included the time of the diagnosis of T-L Fx, the patient's clinical presentation in the ED, the mechanism of injury, and the outcome. Results: Of the 181 patients with major T-L Fxs, 138 were diagnosed in the ED (nondelayed group), and 43 were diagnosed after the patient left the ED (delayed group). Of these, 33 cases occurred in unstable patients requiring emergent medical imaging and/or operation, 7 occurred when emergency physicians failed to detect subtle compression Fxs on ED radiographs, and 3 occurred in stable patients who were not radiographed in the ED. The delayed group were more often critical, and hypotensive, and had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores than did the nondelayed group. The delayed group patients also had more cervical spine injuries, multiple noncontiguous spinal Fxs, high-energy mechanisms of injury, and direct blunt assaults to the back than did the nondelayed group patients. There were 13 patients with T-L Fxs, GCS scores = 15, and normal back examinations. There were 43 patients who had neurologic deficits associated with their injuries; 11 patients with incomplete cord lesions progressed, including 3 in the delayed group. Conclusions: A delay in the diagnosis of T-L Fx in hospitalized trauma patients is frequently associated with an unstable patient condition that necessitates higher-priority procedures than ED T-L spine radiographs. Such patients should receive spinal precautions until more complete evaluation can be performed. The decision to selectively radiograph T-L spines in multiple-trauma patients should consider the mechanism of injury, the presence of possible confounders to physical examination, and clinical signs and symptoms of back injury.     

The use of TRISS methodology to validate prehospital intubation by urban EMS providers

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of field orotracheal intubation (OI) by urban emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps) on outcome compared with trauma score and injury severity score (TRISS) expectations. The records of all trauma patients intubated by EMT-Ps or hospital personnel were abstracted for OI attempts/successes, use of neuromuscular blockade (NMB), scene time, discharge neurological status, and hospital survival compared with TRISS. EMT-Ps attempted 43% of all intubations; 81% were successful versus 98% by hospital staff (P < .05). NMB was used by 76% of hospital intubations versus none by EMS (P < .05). Scene time was 10.3 ± 3.2 minutes versus 11.6 ± 2.1 for patients intubated by emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital staff (P < .05). Sixty percent of patients intubated by EMS versus 68% by hospital staff had good/moderate discharge neurological status. Survival for patients intubated by EMS versus hospital staff was 11% and 40%, respectively, compared with 2% and 45% expected by TRISS. Field OI by urban EMT-Ps has a favorable impact on survival with good neurological outcome (P < .05).     

SOFTLY: Comparison of outcomes of rigid versus soft collar during emergency department investigation for potential cervical spine injury in low-risk blunt trauma patients – A pilot study

Objective

Blunt trauma patients with potential cervical spine injury are traditionally immobilised in rigid collars. Recently, this has been challenged. The present study's objective was comparison of the rate of patient-oriented adverse events in stable, alert, low-risk patients with potential cervical spine injuries immobilised in rigid versus soft collars.

Methods

Unblinded, prospective quasi-randomised clinical trial of neurologically intact, adult, blunt trauma patients assessed as having potential cervical spine injury. Patients were randomised to collar type. All other aspects of care were unchanged. Primary outcome was patient-reported discomfort related to neck immobilisation by collar type. Secondary outcomes included adverse neurological events, agitation and clinically important cervical spine injuries (clinical trial registration number: ACTRN12621000286842).

Results

A total of 137 patients were enrolled: 59 patients allocated to a rigid collar and 78 to a soft collar. Most injuries were from a fall <1 m (54%) or a motor vehicle crash (21.9%). Median neck pain score of collar immobilisation was lower in the soft collar group (3.0 [interquartile range 0–6.1] vs 6.0 [interquartile range 3–8.8], P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with clinician-identified agitation was lower in the soft collar group (5% vs 17%, P = 0.04). There were four clinically important cervical spine injuries (two in each group). All were treated conservatively. There were no adverse neurological events.

Conclusions

Use of soft rather than rigid collar immobilisation for low-risk blunt trauma patients with potential cervical spine injury is significantly less painful for patients and results in less agitation. A larger study is needed to determine the safety of this approach or whether collars are required at all.     

New Immobilization Guidelines Change EMS Critical Thinking in Older Adults With Spine Trauma

Objective: The impact of immobilization techniques on older adult trauma patients with spinal injury has rarely been studied. Our advisory group implemented a change in the immobilization protocol used by emergency medical services (EMS) professionals across a region encompassing 9 trauma centers and 24 EMS agencies in a Rocky Mountain state using a decentralized process on July 1, 2014. We sought to determine whether implementing the protocol would alter immobilization methods and affect patient outcomes among adults ≥60 years with a cervical spine injury. Methods: This was a 4-year retrospective study of patients ≥60 years with a cervical spine injury (fracture or cord). Immobilization techniques used by EMS professionals, patient demographics, injury characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes were compared before (1/1/12–6/30/14) and after (7/1/14–12/31/15) implementation of the Spinal Precautions Protocol using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Of 15,063 adult trauma patients admitted to nine trauma centers, 7,737 (51%) were ≥60 years. Of those, 237 patients had cervical spine injury and were included in the study; 123 (51.9%) and 114 (48.1%) were transported before and after protocol implementation, respectively. There was a significant shift in the immobilization methods used after protocol implementation, with less full immobilization (59.4% to 28.1%, p < 0.001) and an increase in the use of both a cervical collar only (8.9% to 27.2%, p < 0.001) and not using any immobilization device (15.5% to 31.6%, p = 0.003) after protocol implementation. While the proportion of patients who only received a cervical collar increased after implementing the Spinal Precautions Protocol, the overall proportion of patients who received a cervical collar alone or in combination with other immobilization techniques decreased (72.4% to 56.1%, p = 0.01). The presence of a neurological deficit (6.5% vs. 5.3, p = 0.69) was similar before and after protocol implementation; in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.24–1.30, p = 0.18) was similar post–protocol implementation after adjusting for injury severity. Conclusions: There were no differences in neurologic deficit or patient disposition in the older adult patient with cervical spine trauma despite changes in spinal restriction protocols and resulting differences in immobilization devices.     

Trauma radiology: Part V. Imaging of acute cervical spine trauma

Cervical spine injury constitutes a major cause of morbidity resulting from trauma. The consequences of a missed "significant" injury can be devastating for the patient and can create potential medical legal consequences for involved physicians. Multiple imaging modalities can be applied to imaging of the cervical spine after trauma, including radiography, computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Controversy exists concerning the appropriate number of radiographic views required for the screening assessment of cervical spine injuries. CT clarifies uncertain radiological findings, identifies subtle fractures in patients with neck pain or with neurological deficits but with normal radiographs, determines details of injury, and assists in operative planning. MRI has virtually replaced myelography and CT myelography in evaluating the traumatized cervical spine. MRI is more accurate than CT with intrathecal contrast in delineating epidural pathology, ligament injury, soft-tissue edema, and cord parenchymal injury. Information derived from MRI guides appropriate management and has value in predicting injury outcome. We consider indications for and relative merits of these various diagnostic modalities, and we describe imaging features of major patterns of cervical spine injury.     

Epidemiology of Thoracolumbar Spine Injury in Blunt Trauma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, distribution, and demographics of thoracolumbar (TL) spine injuries following blunt trauma. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional study of a consecutive sample of all blunt trauma patients presenting initially to the emergency department (ED) of a Level 1 trauma center and undergoing thoracic and/or lumbar spine radiography from August 1997 to November 1998. The age, sex, and mechanism of injury of each patient as well as location and type of spine injury were recorded for those patients with vertebral fractures, dislocations, or subluxations. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred four blunt trauma patients were enrolled. Vertebral injuries were identified in 152 individuals (6.3%, 95% CI = 5.4% to 7.4%). Two hundred sixty distinct anatomic levels of injury were identified in these 152 individuals. Of these 260 injuries, 42 (16.2%) occurred at L1, 38 (14.6%) at L2, 29 (11.1%) at L3, and 27 (10.4%) at T12, making these the most commonly injured vertebrae. Injuries were most common (34 patients) in those aged 30-39 years and were least common (12 patients) in those under 18 years. Compression fractures (52%) were the most common injury in the thoracic spine, while transverse process fractures (48%) were the most common injuries in the lumbar spine. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TL injuries in ED blunt trauma patients undergoing TL radiographs is 6.3%. The most commonly injured area of the TL spine is the thoracolumbar junction.     

Cervical spine clearance and neck extension during percutaneous tracheostomy in trauma patients

INTRODUCTION: The lack of cervical spine clearance and inability to extend the neck are assumed to be relative contraindications for percutaneous tracheostomy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the necessity of cervical spine clearance and neck extension in trauma patients receiving percutaneous tracheostomy. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of case series from August 1, 1995 to August 31, 1998. SETTING: A university-based Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: A total of 88 consecutive trauma patients receiving percutaneous tracheostomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the radiographic or clinical status of their cervical spine: cleared and noncleared. RESULTS: The overall success and complication rate were 99% (87/88) and 11% (10/88), respectively. There were no procedure-related deaths. The cleared group consisted of 60 patients; three patients in this group who had "bull" or "thick" necks did not have full neck extension during percutaneous tracheostomy. The noncleared group consisted of 28 patients, 13 of which had known cervical spine fractures; 27 noncleared patients were maintained in the neutral position (no extension) during percutaneous tracheostomy, whereas one patient with low suspicion of spinal injury was partially extended. Of the 13 patients with cervical spine fractures, six patients had been stabilized with a halo or operative fixation, and seven patients were stabilized with a cervical collar at the time of percutaneous tracheostomy. The success rate was 100% (60/60) for the cleared group compared with 96% (27/28) for the noncleared group (p > .05). The complication rate was 13% (8/60) for the cleared group compared with 7.1% (2/28) for the noncleared group (p > .05). We had a 100% success rate and no complications in the seven patients with cervical spine injury who were stabilized with a cervical collar. No patient had spinal cord injury caused by percutaneous tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous tracheostomy can be safely performed in trauma patients without cervical spine clearance and neck extension, including patients with stabilized cervical spine or spinal cord injury.     

Pain Scores Improve Analgesic Administration Patterns for Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of pain scores in improving pain management practices for trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective, observational study of analgesic administration to trauma patients was conducted over a nine-week period following educational intervention and introduction of verbal pain scores (VPSs). All ED nursing and physician staff in an urban Level I trauma center were trained to use the 0-10 VPS. Patients younger than 12 years old, having a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) <8, or requiring intubation were excluded from analysis. Demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs, pain scores, and analgesic data were extracted from a computerized ED database and patients' records. The staff was blinded to the ongoing study. RESULTS: There were 150 patients studied (183 consecutive trauma patients seen; 33 patients excluded per criteria). Pain scores were documented for 73% of the patients. Overall, 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 45% to 61%) of the patients received analgesics in the ED. Of the patients who had pain scores documented, 60% (95% CI = 51% to 69%) received analgesics, whereas 33% (95% CI = 18% to 47%) of the patients without pain scores received analgesics. No patient with a VPS < 4 received analgesics, whereas 72% of patients with a VPS > 4 and 82% with a VPS > 7 received analgesics. Mean time to analgesic administration was 68 minutes (95% CI = 49 to 87). CONCLUSIONS: Pain assessment using VPS increased the likelihood of analgesic administration to trauma patients with higher pain scores in the ED.     

The Frequency of Unsuspected Minor Illness or Injury in Intoxicated Patients

Objective: To determine the frequency of unsuspected minor illness or injury in a group of patients frequently seen in the ED for acute intoxication.
Methods: The medical records of the 20 patients seen most frequently in the ED for acute intoxication in 1993 were reviewed for the number of ED visits for intoxication, the number of associated documented episodes of minor trauma or illness, the extent of ED workup of discovered illness or injury, and patient disposition from the ED.
Results: The 20 study patients were evaluated in the ED 1,858 times in 1993 for acute intoxication, a mean of 92.5 visits/patient (±26.6). The most frequent injury was minor trauma above the neck, occurring a mean of 9 times (±3.6) in each of the study patients during 1993. Evaluation included repeated neurologic examinations and frequent radiography of the cervical spine ( n = 80), skull ( n = 5), facial bones ( n = 6), and mandible ( n = 5). A limited number of head CT scans also were done ( n = 8). The most frequent minor illnesses were gastritis ( n = 7), managed with hydration, and mild hypothermia ( n = 6), managed with passive rewarming.
Conclusions: The incidence of unsuspected minor illness or injury in this patient group was substantial. While most unsuspected medical problems had little clinical significance, some were potentially dangerous, and some necessitated hospitalization (e.g., hypothermia, hematemesis, and respiratory depression).     

Potential adverse effects of spinal immobilization in children

Abstract Objective. The purpose of our study was to describe potential adverse effects associated with spinal immobilization following trauma among children. Methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation following trauma over a 13-month period. Children were eligible if they underwent spinal immobilization prior to physician evaluation or if they met the American College of Surgeons (ACS) guidelines for spinal immobilization but were not immobilized. We compared children who were immobilized with those who were not immobilized for self-reported pain, use of radiography to evaluate the cervical spine, ED length of stay, and ED disposition. We also report the characteristics of the cohort. Results. One hundred seventy-three spine-immobilized children and 112 children who met ACS criteria but were not immobilized were enrolled. There were differences between the two study groups, which included age, mechanism of injury, and proportion transported by emergency medical services. However, the comparison groups had comparable Pediatric Trauma Scores (PTSs) and Glasgow Coma Scale scores (GCSs). Immobilized children had a higher median pain score (3 versus 2) and were more likely to undergo cervical radiography (56.6% versus 13.4%) and be admitted to the hospital (41.6% versus 14.3%). The comparison groups had similar lengths of stay in the ED. Conclusion. Despite presenting with comparable PTSs and GCSs, children who underwent spinal immobilization following trauma had a higher degree of self-reported pain, and were much more likely to undergo radiographic cervical spine clearance and be admitted to the hospital than those who were not immobilized. Future studies are warranted to determine whether these differences are related to spinal immobilization or differences in the mechanisms of injury, injury patterns, or other variables.     

Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head trauma

To establish an incidence of cervical spine injuries in significant blunt head trauma and to evaluate the necessity of using cervical radiography, all consecutive cases of blunt head trauma admitted to the trauma service over a 7-month period were reviewed. Two hundred twenty-eight charts were reviewed for demographic information, circumstance of injury, complaints and physical findings referable to the cervical spine, presenting level of consciousness, severity of head injury, and cervical spine radiographic findings. Only three patients were found to have cervical spine injuries, for an incidence of 1.7%. Of the 122 alert and asymptomatic patients, none had cervical spine injury. The patient population was defined, yet the very low incidence of cervical spine injuries associated with blunt head trauma in this study precludes any identification of predictors. Nevertheless, the results suggest that alert and asymptomatic patients can be spared cervical spine radiography.     

Emergency Physicians' Attitudes toward and Use of Clinical Decision Rules for Radiography

Objectives: 1) To assess Canadian emergency physicians' (EPs') use of and attitudes toward 2 radiographic clinical decision rules that have recently been developed and to identify physician characteristics associated with decision rule use; 2) to determine the use of CT head and cervical spine radiography by EPs and their beliefs about the appropriateness of expert recommendations supporting the routine use of these radiographic procedures; and 3) to determine the potential acceptance of clinical decision rules for CT scan in patients with minor head injury and cervical spine radiography in trauma patients. Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous mail survey of a random sample of 300 members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians using Dillman's Total Design Method for mail surveys. Results: Of 288 eligible physicians, 232 (81%) responded. More than 95% of the respondents stated they currently used the Ottawa Ankle Rules and were willing to consider using the newly developed Ottawa Knee Rule. Physician characteristics related to frequent use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules were younger age, fewer years since graduating from medical school, part time or resident employment status, working in a hospital without a CT scanner, and believing that decision rules are not oversimplified cookbook medicine or too rigid to apply. Eighty-five percent did not agree that all patients with minor head injuries should receive a CT head scan and only 3.5% stated they always refer such patients for CT scan. Similarly, 78.5% of the respondents did not agree that all trauma patients should receive cervical spine radiography and only 13.2% said they always refer such patients for cervical spine radiography. Ninety-seven and 98% stated they would be willing to consider using well-validated decision rules for CT scan of the head and cervical spine radiography, respectively. Fifty-two percent and 67% of the respondents required the proposed CT and C-spine to be 100% sensitive for identifying serious injuries, respectively. Conclusions: Canadian EPs are generally supportive of clinical decision rules and, in particular, have very positive attitudes toward the Ottawa Ankle and Knee Rules. Furthermore, EPs disagree with recommendations for routine use of CT head and cervical spine radiography and strongly support the development of well-validated decision rules for the use of CT head and cervical spine radiography. Most EPs expected the latter rules to be 100% sensitive for acute clinically significant lesions.     

The safety of nurse clearance of the cervical spine using the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria

Objectives: To determine the level of agreement between trained ED nursing staff and senior ED medical staff in the application and interpretation of the National Emergency X‐radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low‐risk criteria (NLC). Methods: A NEXUS training and accreditation package was developed. It was successfully undertaken by 22 senior ED nursing staff and 26 senior ED medical staff. A study nurse and doctor independently applied the NLC to a convenience sample of patients who had been placed in a hard cervical collar prior to arrival in the ED. The findings for each of the NLC and the overall decision regarding collar removal were recorded on specific case report forms. The primary endpoint was the level of agreement for the overall decision to leave the collar in place. Levels of agreement for the individual NLC were also examined. Results: In total, 183 patients were recruited. The level of ‘safe agreement’ where nursing and medical staff agreed that the collar should be left in place was 94.3% (95% CI: 89.5–97.2%). Agreement with regard to individual NLC varied from good to fair. The median times from patient arrival to completion of study nurse and doctor assessments were 14 min (interquartile ranges [IQR] 5–30) and 29 min (IQR 15–47), respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrated a high level of agreement between nursing and medical staff for stable low‐risk trauma patients.     

Prehospital emergency endotracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fiberscope.

Among all prehospital emergency intubations, difficulties occur in 7-10%. Furthermore, intubation conditions often worsen when the cervical spine is immobilized in trauma patients. We report on six patients in whom the Bonfils intubation fiberscope, a reusable, rigid fiberoptic device, was used for emergency endotracheal intubation in the field. Three of these patients had an anticipated or unanticipated difficult airway: two trauma patients with immobilized cervical spine and one patient in cardiac arrest in whom direct laryngoscopy failed twice. Endotracheal intubation with the Bonfils intubation fiberscope was successful in all cases in the first attempt. The Bonfils intubation fiberscope therefore demonstrated its value as an additional airway management device in both emergency and prehospital settings.     

Cervical spine injury and radiography in alert, high-risk patients

Controversy exists over the need for cervical spine radiographs in alert, nonintoxicated victims of blunt trauma. We identified 286 patients admitted to a Level II trauma center over a 14-month period who were alert (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] greater than 13) and considered at high risk for cervical spine injury by published criteria. All 5 (1.7%) fractures or ligament disruptions occurred in the group with neck pain or tenderness. Of the study group, 141 (49%) were asymptomatic for cervical injury and nonintoxicated (blood alcohol concentration (BAC) less than 100 mg/dL). Mandatory cervical spine radiography in this group would have resulted in an additional cost of $33,699. Routine cervical spine radiography in alert, nonintoxicated asymptomatic victims of blunt trauma is a costly practice that warrants further examination.