Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient

To determine the influence of valve selection on valve-related morbidity and mortality and patient survival, comparative long-term performance characteristics of mechanical (N = 68) and bioprosthetic (N = 73) heart valves were analyzed for 141 patients more than 70 years old who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement between 1970 and 1985. Cumulative patient follow-up was 491 patient-years (average, 4.3 years per patient). Hospital mortality was 18% and 19% for patients with mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Survival at 5 years was 61 +/- 7% (+/- the standard error) and 67 +/- 10% for recipients of mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Male sex (p = 0.014) and urgency of operation (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Atrial fibrillation increased valve-related mortality (p = 0.01). No patient required reoperation or experienced structural valve failure. While anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was increased in recipients of mechanical valves (9.2 +/- 2.1%/patient-year) compared with recipients of bioprosthetic valves (2.3 +/- 1.1%/patient-year), it did not result in a death or lead to permanent disability. There was no difference in freedom from any valve-related complication at 5 years. However, when all morbid events are considered, recipients of bioprosthetic valves experienced fewer valve-related complications than patients receiving mechanical valves (10.7 +/- 2.3%/patient-year versus 17.6 +/- 2.5%/patient-year, respectively; p less than 0.05). The reduced incidence of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage and the infrequent need for warfarin sodium anticoagulation favor selection of a bioprosthetic heart valve in patients older than 70 years.     

Bj?rk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis

Between January 1977 and December 1982, 986 Bj?rk-Shiley and 744 Carpentier-Edwards valves were implanted in 774 and 620 patients, respectively, at the same institution. All Bj?rk-Shiley patients and 57% of patients with a Carpentier-Edwards valve in the mitral position received long-term anticoagulation. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years (range 0 to 8.8) in the Bj?rk-Shiley patients and 3.5 years (range 0 to 8.2) in the Carpentier-Edwards group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in hospital mortality (Bj?rk-Shiley 7.6%; Carpentier-Edwards 6.0%), overall incidence of embolism (Bj?rk-Shiley 1.4 per 100 patient-years; Carpentier-Edwards 1.6% py), endocarditis (Bj?rk-Shiley 0.6% py; Carpentier-Edwards 0.8% py), periporsthetic leak (Bj?rk-Shiley 1.6% py; Carpentier-Edwards 1.4% py), anticoagulant-related complications (Bj?rk-Shiley 0.3% py; Carpentier-Edwards 0.1% py), valve failure (Bj?rk-Shiley 0.78% py; Carpentier-Edwards 0.68% py), reoperation for complication (Bj?rk-Shiley 1.68% py; Carpentier-Edwards 1.22% py), and late mortality (Bj?rk-Shiley 3.1% py; Carpentier-Edwards 3.0% py). Actuarial freedom from valve-related events was similar in the two groups. In the aortic position, freedom from embolism was significantly better in the Bj?rk-Shiley group than the Carpentier-Edwards group (Bj?rk-Shiley 99% at 3 and 5 years; Carpentier-Edwards 96% and 92% at 3 and 5 years; p = 0.023). In the mitral position, the overall incidence of reoperation was higher in the Bj?rk-Shiley group (1.78% py) than in the Carpentier-Edwards group (0.48% py) (p = 0.004). Actuarial analysis shows this difference to be confined to the first 6 years of follow-up. The commonest indication for reoperation was valve failure in both groups. However, when analysis is confined to this indication, the difference between the reoperation incidence in the mitral position becomes insignificant (Bj?rk-Shiley 0.85% py; Carpentier-Edwards 0.29% py; p = 0.085). This study confirms the satisfactory performance of both the Carpentier-Edwards and Bj?rk-Shiley valves in the short and middle term and indicates no clear-cut advantage for either prosthesis.     

Early and late results of aortic valve replacement. A series of 510 patients

Aortic valve replacement was performed in 510 patients (Bj?rk-Shiley valves in 93%), with concomitant surgical procedures in 146 cases. The patients were grouped according to technique of myocardial protection: Group I (n = 98) selective coronary perfusion, group II (n = 82) topical cooling, and group III (n = 330) cold crystalloid cardioplegia and topical cooling. The early mortality rate was 5.7% overall: Among patients with isolated aortic valve replacement in groups I, II and III it was 8.4, 1.7 and 1.3%, respectively, and among those with additional surgery 40.0, 12.5 and 8.4%. Myocardial infarction and low cardiac output were responsible for 65.5% of the early deaths. Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 16 11/12 years, totalling 2,859 patient years. In patients with isolated aortic valve replacement and Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis, the incidence of valve-related late complications/100 patient years was 0.49 for thromboembolism, 0.82 for anticoagulant-related haemorrhage and 0.49 for prosthetic valve endocarditis. There was no thrombotic encapsulation in aortic position. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 83% and 72%. Aortic valve replacement is a safe procedure and concomitant operations do not unreasonably increase risks.     

Mechanical failure of the Bj?rk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management

The experience after implantation of 3,334 Bj?rk-Shiley valves over a 15 year period is described. With a 99.2% follow-up (covering 17,511 patient-years, mean follow-up time 6.3 years) and an autopsy rate of 75% among all fatalities, altogether 19 cases of mechanical failure were documented. There were no mechanical failures among the standard Delrin Bj?rk-Shiley valve (n = 271), the aortic standard Pyrolyte Bj?rk-Shiley (n = 739), or the Monostrut Bj?rk-Shiley valve (n = 377). One of the mitral standard Pyrolyte valves (n = 430) fractured. Among the 1,461 convexo-concave valves, 18 fractured (6/884 with an opening angle of 60 degrees and 12/577 with an opening angle of 70 degrees). The actuarial incidence of mechanical failure at 5 years was 0.6% (with an upper 95% confidence limit of 1.2%) for the 60 degree convexo-concave valve and 2.8% (upper 95% confidence limit of 4.4%) for the 70 degree convexo-concave valve (p less than 0.01). Two groups of valves were especially affected by this complication; the 23 mm aortic 60 degree convexo-concave valve (5 year actuarial incidence 2.2%, upper 95% confidence limit 4.7%) and the 29 to 31 mm mitral 70 degree convexo-concave valve (8.3%, upper 95% confidence limit 14.2%). The hazard function presently indicates a constant (60 degree convexo-concave) or decreasing (70 degree convexo-concave) tendency for mechanical failure. The time interval between the first symptom of mechanical failure and circulatory collapse was significantly (p less than 0.01) shorter after aortic failure than after mitral failure, and no patient with a fractured aortic prosthesis survived long enough to undergo reoperation. The incidence of mechanical failure among patients dying suddenly (but with an autopsy) was 9.6% (95% confidence limits 4.9%-16.6%), and most cases of sudden death were unrelated to the prosthesis. The management of patients with suspected mechanical failure is described. Prophylactic re-replacements are discussed but cannot be generally recommended at present.     

Ten-year analysis of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve

Long-term performance characteristics of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve were determined by analyzing the follow-up of 514 patients undergoing operation between 1971 and 1981. Cumulative follow-up was 2,601 patient-years (average, 5.3 +/- 3.8 years); 53% (238/452) of hospital survivors have been followed more than 5 years. Valve-related complications expressed as both actuarial event-free percents (+/- standard error at 10 years) and first-event linearized determinations (percent per patient-year) occurred at the following rates: thromboembolism, 82 +/- 3 and 2.3 +/- 0.3, respectively; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 60 +/- 4 and 5.6 +/- 0.5; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 94 +/- 2 and 0.8 +/- 0.2; valve thrombosis, 97 +/- 1 and 0.4 +/- 0.1; reoperation, 94 +/- 2 and 0.6 +/- 0.2; valve failure, 82 +/- 4 and 1.6 +/- 0.2; and composite valve-related morbidity and mortality, 46 +/- 4 and 8.8 +/- 0.2. Overall survival was 72 +/- 2% at 5 years and 55 +/- 3% at 10 years; valve-related complications accounted for 22% of the late deaths. Although no instance of structural valve failure could be identified, 25% of valve-related complications resulted from valve failure, of which 67% were fatal. By 10 years, 54% of patients had experienced at least one form of major valve-related complication, 16% of which proved fatal. The Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve has late valve-related complications similar to other existing mechanical prostheses that have been subjected to long-term analysis.     

Survival and valve failure after aortic valve replacement.

A prospective evaluation of 412 consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement between January 1982 and December 1985 was performed in an attempt to identify the determinants of survival and valve failure. A variety of valves were inserted to permit a prospective evaluation of alternative valves including: Bj?rk-Shiley mechanical (n = 37), Ionescu-Shiley pericardial (n = 261), Hancock pericardial (n = 78), and Carpentier-Edwards porcine (n = 36). Thirteen patients died in the hospital (3.2%) and 47 patients died in the follow-up period producing an actuarial survival of 81% +/- 3% at 48 months. Survival was independently predicted by advancing age, preoperative New York Heart Association functional class, and the presence of endocarditis (p less than 0.05 by Cox regression analysis). The majority of patients were symptomatically improved (New York Heart Association class I or II: 21% preoperative, 88% postoperative). Freedom from structural valve dysfunction, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and reoperation for valve-related complications were 95% +/- 2%, 95% +/- 2%, and 92% +/- 2% at 48 months, respectively. These valve-related complications occurred more frequently in younger patients and in those with a Hancock pericardial valve (freedom from structural valve dysfunction, 89% +/- 5%; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 84% +/- 9%; reoperation, 78% +/- 10%; p less than 0.05 by Cox regression). Freedom from thromboembolism was 88% +/- 2% at 48 months; it was significantly lower in patients with a preoperative thromboembolic event and was not influenced by the type of prosthesis inserted. Freedom from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was 85% +/- 8% at 48 months and was not influenced by any preoperative factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves

The three series with the first-generation valve prostheses were reviewed for long-term clinical evaluation in isolated aortic and mitral valve replacement. Hancock porcine xenograft was implanted in 71 patients from 1977 to 1979, ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft (standard model) in 271 patients from 1979 to 1983, and Bjork-Shiley tilting disc valve in 194 from 1978 to 1986. In aortic position, no any significant difference among three valve types could be demonstrated in the actuarial survival and freedom from thromboembolism and valve infection, while the actuarial freedom from valve dysfunction in lonescu-Shiley valve was significantly lower than that in other two valves. Bj?rk-Shiley valve in mitral position showed satisfactory clinical performance in terms of valve-related complications and survival in comparison with two types of bioprosthetic valves. In our conclusion at present time, Bj?rk-Shiley valve is suitable for the first choice of both aortic and mitral valve prostheses. In case of valve replacement with a bioprosthesis, however, porcine aortic valve is a better choice for aortic, and bovine pericardial valve likely for mitral replacement.     

Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis

The results of 1753 consecutive aortic valve replacements performed during a 15-year period (1969 to June 1983) are reported. All patients received one of five models of the Bj?rk-Shiley valve. The follow-up was 99.6% complete and covered 10,658 patient-years (mean 6.4 years). An autopsy was performed in 72% of all fatalities. Early mortality was 5.5%. The early mortality rate for patients undergoing isolated, elective aortic valve replacement between 1979 and 1983 was 2.3%. Five-, 10-, and 15-year actuarial survival rates (early mortality excluded) were 85%, 70%, and 54%, respectively, and complication-free survival rates at the same time intervals were 78%, 59%, and 42%. Eighteen percent of the late deaths were considered valve related. Anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was the single most common valve-related complication (1.4/100 patient-years) and the most common valve-related cause of death (0.3/100 patient-years). The incidences of embolism and valve thrombosis were closely related to the efficacy of the anticoagulant program. Fourteen of 19 valve thromboses occurred among 180 patients without anticoagulants. The incidences of embolism and valve thrombosis among 1573 patients with continuous anticoagulant treatment were 0.7 and 0.06/100 patient-years, respectively. Six strut fractures occurred, all in convexo-concave valves. There was no mechanical failure among the Monostrut valves. The incidence of "prosthetic failure" (ie, valve-related complications [not leakage] necessitating reoperation or causing the patient's death) was 0.6/100 patient-years. The incidence of embolism and prosthetic failure was similar for the different valve models, and these long-term results might therefore be considered representative for all Bj?rk-Shiley aortic valves.     

Long-term clinical results after combined aortic and mitral valve replacement

The results after 282 consecutive double (aortic & mitral) valve replacements (DVR) are compared with our previously reported experience after mitral (MVR, n = 810) and aortic valve replacement (AVR, n = 1753). All but one patient received Bj?rk-Shiley valves. The follow-up which closed on August 1, 1985 was 99.3% and covered 16,869 patient-years (mean 6.3 years/patient). Autopsies were performed in 74% of all fatalities. Early mortality rates were identical in the three patient groups, and late mortality did not differ between MVR and DVR patients. The fraction of valve-related mortality was similar in all groups. Anticoagulant-related bleeding was equally common in all patient groups. The incidences of thromboembolism, reoperation and valve failure did not differ between MVR and DVR patients, but were significantly higher than among AVR patients. With the exception of a slightly increased incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis, the results after DVR equal those after MVR. In cases with severe mitral valve disease but borderline aortic valve disease, primary DVR is clearly justified and eliminates the need for, and risks of, a secondary AVR.     

Operative results of tricuspid valve replacement with St. Jude Medical prosthesis

Since 1974, 14 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with prosthetic heart valves. Hardy's operation was undergone in 2 patients with Ebstein's anomaly and mitral valve surgery or multiple valve surgery were undergone in 9 patients with rheumatic valvular disease, concomitantly. Four types of prosthetic heart valves were used in the tricuspid position, i.e. 2 Starr-Edwards prostheses, 1 Hancock xenograft, 1 Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis and 12 st. Jude Medical prostheses. The operative mortality rate was 14.3% (2/14) and 2 hospital deaths were due to low cardiac output syndrome. Twelve survivors have been followed with a maximum follow-up of 13 years and the mean of 4.7 years. There were 3 late deaths due to congestive heart failure and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) of the aortic Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis. There was 1 PVE of the tricuspid Starr-Edwards prosthesis and 1 thrombosis of the tricuspid Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis, but no thrombosis and no other valve-related complications of SJM prostheses in the tricuspid position. The post-operative NYHA function class improved satisfactorily in 9 survivors. Judging from our relatively satisfactory post-operative results in TVR cases using SJM prostheses, SJM prosthesis in the tricuspid position is one of advisable prosthesis to get satisfactory hemodynamic improvement post-operatively.     

A five-year appraisal and hemodynamic evaluation of the Bj?rk-Shiley Monostrut valve

Two hundred forty-four Bj?rk-Shiley Monostrut valves were implanted in 225 consecutive patients from October 1983 to December 1988. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 90 patients, mitral valve replacement in 118, and double valve replacement in 16 patients. One patient had tricuspid valve replacement. There were 100 female patients and 125 male patients with a mean age of 54 years (range 2 to 71 years). Present data were completely available for all patients. The cumulative follow-up was 541 patient-years with a mean of 2 years, 5 months. The closing date for follow-up was July 1989, and the closing interval was 2 months. The early mortality rate was 3.1%, and the late mortality rate, 3.1%. The 5-year survival rate was 88% +/- 2.0%: 87% +/- 3.0% for aortic valve replacement, 91% +/- 3.3% for mitral valve replacement, and 75% +/- 9.6% for double valve replacement. The actuarial rates of freedom from thromboembolism at 5 years were 93% +/- 3.2% for aortic, 96% +/- 1.4% for mitral, and 94% +/- 6.1% for double valve replacement. There were no instances of structural valve deterioration. Actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related morbidity and mortality was 86% +/- 2.0% at 5 years: 86% +/- 9.5% for aortic, 87% +/- 3.3% for mitral, and 75% +/- 7.3% for double valve replacement. Effective valve areas (average) of 12 mitral and 12 aortic valve prostheses were calculated at rest and during bicycle exercise: 2.4 cm2 at rest and 2.8 cm2 during exercise in 27 mm aortic valves, 2.4 cm2 at rest and 3.0 cm2 during exercise in 25 mm aortic valves, 2.0 cm2 at rest and 2.4 cm2 during exercise in 27 mm mitral valves, and 2.6 cm2 at rest and 2.5 cm2 during exercise in 29 mm mitral valve. On the basis of our follow-up period of 5 years, we have judged the Bj?rk-Shiley Monostrut valve reliable, with a low incidence of valve-related morbidity and with acceptably satisfactory hemodynamic characteristics at rest and during exercise.     

Valve replacement in children under twenty years of age. Experience with the Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis

Prosthetic valve replacement in young patients has been reported to be associated with a high mortality and morbidity because of valve-related problems. Of 549 patients undergoing valve replacement with the Bj?rk-Shiley valve prosthesis, 136 were under the age of 20 years. Sixty-four patients were under 16 years of age, the youngest being 6 years old. Of the 136 patients, 61 underwent mitral valve replacement, 50 received an aortic valve, and 25 received both aortic and mitral valves. Overall operative mortality was 10.3%. Late mortality over a follow-up period of 6 months to 8 years was 4.4%. Actuarial survival curves up to 8 years of follow-up are presented. Results obtained in this group are compared with those obtained in 413 patients over 20 years of age operated during the same period. Valve thrombosis was not seen in any patient under 20 years of age, but it occurred in 4.13% of the patients over 20 years of age. The incidence of thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was very low. There has been no instance of structural failure of the valve. Long-term results are excellent, with 90% of the survivors returning to New York Heart Association Functional Class I. The Bj?rk-Shiley valve gives excellent and durable long-term palliation in young patients requiring valve replacement.     

Development of an artificial heart valve

When I reviewed the 21-year results with the Bj?rk-Shiley tilting disc valves, I found out that to date, we still have to use these disc valves and all mechanical heart valves with anticoagulation therapy. The highest incidence of valve-related postoperative deaths after aortic valve replacements in Stockholm was anticoagulation-related bleeding, which continued at a rate of about 1% year after year. There is a need to improve the quality of life for heart valve patients, especially for children, for young females who want to have children, for the older generation who are on medical treatment, and for all patients in whom long-term anticoagulation of a perfect quality is impossible to guarantee. A series of tests on goats has been performed, using the Bj?rk-Shiley Monostrut valve used in 2,024 patients at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm and in 75,000 patients worldwide for up to 8 years with a modification of a microporous surface. In the mitral position, this modified partially microporous-surfaced Bj?rk-Shiley Monostrut valve has permitted goats to live for 5 years with four normal pregnancies without anticoagulation therapy.     

Long-term comparative analysis of the Bj?rk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975

The long-term results in all patients undergoing isolated mitral, aortic, or double mitral-aortic heart valve replacement operated upon in 1975 has been retrospectively analyzed. A total of 153 patients received the standard Bj?rk-Shiley (flat pyrolytic disc) mechanical prostheses and 150 patients received the noncomposite Hancock porcine xenograft. Overall operative mortality was not significantly different between groups. All patients receiving a Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis, but none in the Hancock group, received long-term anticoagulant therapy. Medium and long-term actuarial survival rates (5 and 10 years postoperatively) were comparable for the two groups (88% for Bj?rk-Shiley and 84% for Hancock [NS] at 5 years; 86% for Bj?rk-Shiley and 80% for Hancock at 10 years [NS]). The incidence of systemic embolism was similar in the two groups (1.6% +/- 0.4% per patient-year for the Bj?rk-Shiley group and 1.3% +/- 0.3% per patient-year for the Hancock group [NS]). Also the incidence of endocarditis was similar (0.6% +/- 0.2% per patient-year for the Bj?rk-Shiley group and 0.8% +/- 0.3% per patient-year for the Hancock group [NS]). In the Hancock group the overall incidence of reoperations was significantly higher than in the Bj?rk-Shiley group (4.2% +/- 0.6% per patient-year versus 0.9% +/- 0.3% per patient-year (p = 0.001). The major cause for reoperation in the Hancock group was primary tissue failure (3% +/- 0.5% per patient-year). In the Bj?rk-Shiley group the major cause of reoperation was valve thrombosis (0.5% +/- 0.2% per patient-year). Therefore, accepting the fact that other bioprostheses may behave differently from the Hancock noncomposite xenograft, we currently restrict our indications for valve replacement with bioprostheses.     

Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis

Late result of Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis selected in the aortic and mitral position for valve replacement was reviewed on 222 cases in our 10 years clinical experience. Late survival was 93.8% (5 yrs), 83% (10 yrs) in the aortic position, 94% (5 yrs) and 80% (10 yrs) in the mitral position. Valve-related complication by Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis was very low in incidence as compared with that published by other institution with respects to thromboembolism, prosthetic valve endocarditis, reoperation, anticoagulation-related bleeding. Inflammatory aortic valve disease which developed valve detachment in the aortic position with Bj?rk-Shiley valve was treated with double-suture technique in the aortic annulus and fixation of the graft with the inside of sinus of Valsalva, en-bloc reconstruction with composite graft using Bj?rk-Shiley valve inside of the sinus Valsalva without touch to coronary ostium. The other surgical procedure was translocation method using Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis. Our clinical results suggest that Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis is still recommended in the aortic and mitral positions from low incidence of valve-related complication and good late survival.     

Determinants of survival and valve failure after mitral valve replacement

A prospective evaluation of 333 consecutive patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement between 1982 and 1985 was performed to identify the predictors of survival and valve failure. Follow-up between 2 and 6 years postoperatively (mean, 32 +/- 17 months) was 98% complete. Four prostheses were inserted to permit a prospective evaluation of alternative valves: Bj?rk-Shiley mechanical (n = 118), Ionescu-Shiley pericardial (n = 146), Carpentier-Edwards porcine (n = 38), and Hancock pericardial (n = 31). Hospital mortality was 6%, and actuarial survival at 5 years was 74% +/- 5%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified advancing age (less than 40 years, 88% +/- 7%; greater than 70 years, 50% +/- 14%) and poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction less than 0.20, 62% +/- 17%; ejection fraction greater than 0.60, 80% +/- 7%) as independent predictors of postoperative survival. Freedom from structural valve dysfunction, prosthetic valve endocarditis, reoperation, and valve-related mortality and morbidity were 86% +/- 4%, 91% +/- 4%, 81% +/- 4%, and 72% +/- 5%, respectively, at 5 years. The actuarial incidence of valve failure was inordinately high with the Hancock pericardial valve (p less than 0.05). Freedom from thromboembolic events (78% +/- 8% at 5 years) was significantly lower in patients with poor ventricular function (ejection fraction (less than 0.20, 54% +/- 20%; ejection fraction greater than 0.60, 73% +/- 11%; p less than 0.05). Survival after mitral valve replacement was determined by age and left ventricular function. Premature failure of the Hancock pericardial valve resulted in an unacceptable rate of valve-related complications.     

Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience

A total of 479 valve replacements were performed in 469 patients for aortic, mitral, and tricuspid disease. A total of 529 valves were implanted (311 Carpentier-Edwards, 118 Hancock, 94 Bj?rk-Shiley, and six other mechanical valves). Of the 479 operations, 51.1% (245) were carried out in male patients and 48.9% (234) were carried out in female patients. The mean age was 57.6 years; however, 28.6% (137) of the operations were performed in patients over 65 years of age. One hundred five patients (21.9%) had had previous cardiac operations of one type or another. Follow-up was 99.6% and the average length of follow-up was 36.2 months. The overall operative mortality was 5.6%. The operative mortality in the isolated aortic valve replacement group was 2.0% and that in the mitral valve replacement group, 4.4%. There was a 5.9% valve explant rate in the Hancock series; however, no valve explants were required because of valve dysfunction in either the Carpentier-Edwards or the Bj?rk-Shiley groups. The thromboembolic rate in the aortic valve position was 2.4, 1.1, and 2.1 emboli per 100 patient-years in the Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards, and Bj?rk-Shiley groups, respectively. The thromboembolic rate in the mitral valve position was 2.8, 2.2, and 1.0 emboli per 100 patient-years in the Hancock, Carpentier-Edwards, and Bj?rk-Shiley groups, respectively.     

Clinical and hemodynamic results of cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis

Between May 1983 and April 1986, 318 patients underwent cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis. There were 136 aortic valve replacements, 128 mitral valve replacements, and 54 multiple replacements. A total of 373 valves were implanted. Associated procedures were done in 79 (25%) of the patients. Hospital (30-day) mortality rate was 5.6% (18 patients): 2.9% (n = 4) after aortic, 7.8% (n = 10) after mitrals and 7.4% (n = 4) after multiple valve replacement. Follow-up was obtained in all 300 operative survivors, for a total of 500 patient-years (mean 18 months). Actuarial survival rate, excluding operative deaths, at 4 years was 94.7% +/- 1.5% (mean +/- standard error of the mean). There were 16 thromboembolic episodes (3.2/100 patient-years). Freedom from all valve-related complications was 87% +/- 2.4% at 3 1/2 years. Neither valve thrombosis nor structural failure has been observed. Eighty percent of the patients are in New York Heart Association functional class I. Forty-two patients (26 with aortic and 16 with mitral valve replacement) underwent cardiac catheterization a mean of 6 1/2 months after the operation. In the aortic position, peak gradients were an average of 6.9 +/- 1.2 mm Hg. Mean systolic gradients were 12.4 +/- 6.3 mm Hg and did not increase with exercise. In the mitral position, end-diastolic gradients were an average of 2.1 +/- 2 mm Hg and mean gradients, 5.9 +/- 2 mm Hg. Discharge coefficient (estimated orifice area/geometric area) was 0.63 +/- 0.2 for the aortic and 0.53 +/- 0.2 for the mitral prostheses. Disc opening was maximal in most patients. These results indicate that the Monostrut prosthesis has a low rate of thromboembolic events, no structural failures or thrombotic obstructions and excellent hemodynamic performance, especially in the small aortic sizes (discharge coefficient for 19 and 21 mm valves, 0.77).     

Cardiac valve replacement in patients on dialysis: influence of prosthesis on survival

BACKGROUND: Mechanical valves have been recommended for patients on dialysis because of purported accelerated bioprosthesis degeneration. This study was undertaken to determine time-related outcomes in dialysis patients requiring cardiac valve replacement. METHODS: From 1986 to 1998, 42 patients on chronic preoperative dialysis underwent valve replacement; 17 received mechanical valves and 25 received bioprostheses. Age was similar in both groups: 54+/-18.5 years (mechanical) and 59+/-15.5 years (bioprosthetic, p = 0.4). Sites of valve replacement were aortic (27), mitral (11), and aortic and mitral (4). Follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: Survival at 3 and 5 years was 50% and 33% after mechanical valve replacement, and 36% and 27% after bioprosthetic valve replacement (p = 0.3). Four patients with bioprostheses required reoperation: 3 for allograft endocarditis and 1 at 10 months for mitral bioprosthesis degeneration. One patient who received a mechanical valve required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic valve-related complications in patients on dialysis were similar for both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Because of the limited life expectancy of patients on dialysis, bioprosthesis degeneration will be uncommon. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to implant bioprosthetic valves in these patients.     

Fourteen years' experience with the Bj?rk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis

Between 1970 and 1984, 1,574 Bj?rk-Shiley valve prostheses have been implanted in 1,171 patients in Glasgow. Between 1970 and 1980, 1,023 standard disc prostheses were implanted in 729 patients: 184 had aortic valve replacement, 323 mitral, and 222 multiple valve replacement. Between 1980 and 1984, 551 convexo-concave valves were implanted in 442 patients: 125 had aortic, 228 mitral, and 89 multiple valve replacement. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 9.2% of the latter group as compared with 2.7% of the earlier group. The overall hospital (30 day) mortality for the group with the standard disc prosthesis was 10.4% and for patients with the convexo-concave prosthesis, 7.0%. Cumulative follow-up extends to 4,125 patient-years--standard disc group 3,378 patients-years, range 4 to 14 years (mean 5.2 years); convexo-concave group 747 patient-years, range 1.5 to 5.3 years (mean 1.9 years). The late mortality is 3.8% per patient-year--standard disc group 2.9% per patient-year and convexo-concave group 4.3% per patient year (no significant difference). Actuarial survival rate at 12 years for the whole group, excluding operative deaths, is 69.4% +/- 6.3%. The freedom from all valve-related complications at 12 years is 65.9% +/- 6.5%. there is no significant difference in the incidence of most major complications between the standard disc and convexo-concave prostheses apart from the occurrence of mitral valve thrombosis (p less than 0.05) in the standard disc group and outlet strut fracture (p less than 0.005) in the convexo-concave group. These results confirm the excellent long-term performance of the Bj?rk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.