A Survey of Removable Partial Denture Casts and Major Connector Designs Found in Commercial Laboratories,Athens, Greece

Purpose : This survey was conducted to study the prevalence of partial edentulism, the type of removable partial denture (RPD) support, the type of major connectors, and the frequency of their use in relation to the partial edentulism classes encountered, concerning patients in Athens, Greece. Materials and Methods : The material comprised 628 final casts for RPDs. Each cast was photographed in a way that would allow the number of existing teeth, the classification of partial edentulism, the RPD support, and the particular parts of the metal framework to be identified. Data collected were analyzed statistically using prevalence tables and the χ² test. Results : Two hundred seventy six (43.9%) casts were for the maxilla and 352 (56.1%) for the mandible. The most frequently encountered group was Kennedy class I for both arches, while class IV was the classification least encountered (p < 0.001). Of all RPDs constructed, 96.8% had a metal framework (tooth‐borne and tooth/tissue‐borne), while 3.2% of the RPDs were frameless (tissue‐borne, acrylic dentures). The U‐shaped palatal connector (horseshoe) in the maxilla and the lingual bar in the mandible were the most frequently used for all partial edentulism classes, at 55.2% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions : Analysis of the casts revealed that the type of major connectors selected does not comply with the indications for their applications, considering the lack of dental history and clinical examination. This notes the need for further training dentists and dental technicians in aspects of RPD framework design.     

A systematic approach for removable partial denture design

Patients' attitudes, medical, surgical and financial considerations lead to the use of a removable partial denture (RPD) as the chosen prosthetic restoration even in the "dental implant era". The aim of this article is to describe a systematic approach to RPD design, so the RPD will be a long-term solution that will not harm the remaining oral tissues. There is an unlimited RPD design options. Choosing the right one involves considering biochemical factors, aesthetics and patients' comfort. A systematic approach starts with a correct diagnosis of the remaining hard and soft tissues, followed by a careful planning of support, stability and retention in that order. Additional elements should be added only at a later stage. A systematic track starting with a preliminary design, surveying of the model and analyzing the preliminary design on that surveyed model. If needed, that track should be reversed until an acceptable design is found. Support should ideally be achieved by using metal rests on healthy tooth structure. Tooth supported RPD are the most convenient ones and have a very good long-term prognosis. Old restorations or caries might impose changes from the ideal supporting rests. When posterior teeth are missing or when the edentulous area is vast, tooth-tissue supported RPD are used. In these cases one should gain initial support from the teeth and an additional support from the soft tissues. A denture base that is similar to a full denture base that would have been prepared for a fully edentulous patient should achieve this. If the prognosis of the potential supporting teeth is poor, a tissue-tooth supported RPD is considered. In these cases, the denture base is the primary supporting element, and stress relieving clasp-assemblies such as the RPI/RPA should be considered. Stability is achieved primarily by metal contacts between teeth and the metal framework of the RPD. In fact, any embracing part of the clasp assembly and a correct denture base can contribute to the stability. The distal parts of the retentive clasps produce the active retention. Since these parts generate lateral forces on the abutment teeth, a reciprocating element should be used. True reciprocation can only be achieved if the reciprocating element touches the tooth before the retentive clasp. After designing support, stability and retention, other parts should be considered. When a distal extension RPD is considered, an indirect retainer should be incorporated into the framework in order to prevent upward rotational movement of the denture. The major connector converts forces from one side to the other. In the upper jaw, that part acts also as a supporting element in Kennedy class I and class II cases. In other cases, a minimal type of a major connector should be chosen. As for minor connectors, these should only be added if other parts--such as guiding planes--couldn't be used for the purpose of connecting functional elements to the major connector. In any case, a 5 mm distance between two adjacent minor connectors should be allowed in order to prevent food from being trapped in that space. A systematic approach starts with diagnosis of the remaining tissues and with finding the correct prosthetic solution with the patient. If a RPD is the chosen solution, start designing with analysis of support, followed by stability and only then, decide upon the necessary retentive elements. All other parts should be considered later. Such a systematic approach will ensure a long-term solution and a happy patient.     

Veterans Administration Cooperative Dental Implant Study — Comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part I: Methodology and comparisons between treatment groups at baseline

This study was conducted to determine whether fixed partial dentures supported by dental implants provide an acceptable alternative to conventional removable partial dentures in patients with Kennedy class I or class II edentulous conditions. The acceptability of the new treatment will be based on success rates, impact on the health of the remaining dentition, masticatory performance, patient satisfaction, and maintenance care and cost. The study was planned also to provide comparisons between two designs commonly used by dentists for fabricating removable partial dentures. The designs differed only in terms of the type of the retainer (clasp type) and tooth support (rest location).A total of 272 patients with Kennedy class I and class II edentulous conditions were assigned on a random basis to one of the treatment groups, 134 to receive a removable partial denture and 138 a fixed partial denture supported by a blade-vent implant. All of the patients were medically screened and met prespecified criteria for oral hygiene, bone support for abutment teeth, and size of the residual ridge.Thirty-four patients were eliminated from the study before completion of their treatment. An additional six patients with early implant failures were reentered in the study and followed up as a separate group. The remaining 232 patients received comprehensive dental care, including removable partial dentures for 118 and fixed partial dentures for 114 patients.A series of examinations, radiographs, masticatory performance tests, patient satisfaction, food selection questionnaires, and dietary history were completed before initiation of the treatment, 16 weeks after the insertion of an RPD or an implant, and thereafter at 6-, 18-, 36-, and 60-month intervals. In addition, patients were seen at 6-month intervals for a recall dental examination, oral prophylaxis, plaque instructions, radiographic survey of the implant, and any needed dental treatment.The randomization stratification approach produced two treatment groups with comparable age, number of remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth, type of opposing dentition, and percent of patients with Kennedy class I and class II edentulous conditions. The mean scores of bone support, tooth mobility, and sulcular depths of abutment teeth were also similar. Significant but comparable improvements in oral hygiene and sulcular depth occurred in the two groups after treatment. The periodontal health scores at the 16-week interval serve as the baseline to measure subsequent changes in periodontal health. This prospective longitudinal study with prespecified criteria for implant and removable partial denture failure should provide reliable estimates of failure rates, number and types of complications, maintenance care needs, and total costs for the two treatment modalities and the two RPD designs.     

A survey of dentitions and removable partial dentures constructed for patients in North America

The prevalence of removable partial dentures in North America is not known. This study was designed to collect information about (1) the indications for, (2) the teeth to be replaced with, and (3) the type of major connectors used in removable partial dentures. Five commercial dental laboratories situated in different regions of North America were selected to give as wide as possible a view of the production of removable partial dentures. Each laboratory was asked to provide details of 300 consecutive removable partial dentures. Photographs (35 mm) of master casts and processed partial dentures were obtained for more than 1300 patients. The color slides were analyzed and the remaining teeth and types of dentures were recorded. The dentures were classified as follows: cast frame denture, acrylic resin denture with or without some wrought metal, and acrylic resin denture with some cast units. The major connectors were classified as one of seven alternatives in the maxillae, and as one of six alternatives in the mandible.     

A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system

PURPOSE: This article describes the concept of the Marburg double crown system (MDC system) in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Long-term success is assessed by a review of patient records. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double crowns with clearance fit are used to retain tooth-, mucosa-, and implant-supported removable partial dentures (RPD). To achieve retention, an additional attachment, the TC-SNAP system, is used. All metal components are fabricated in a single cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy; the framework (including outer crowns) is cast in one piece. Because of the framework's rigidity, the RPD can be constructed without major and minor connectors. The denture base adjacent to the abutments is fabricated using a perioprotective design that is similar to fixed partial dentures. One hundred eleven dentures, of which 49 (44%) were fabricated for patients with intraoral defects, were evaluated by reviewing patient records. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of insertion was 57.5 years (+/- 12.3). The mean number of double crowns per denture was 3.5 +/- 2.1 (range, 1 to 9). The probability that a patient will have lost all abutment teeth 10 years after insertion of the denture is 4%. The probability that a patient will have kept all teeth that abut the denture 5 years after insertion is 87%; 10 years after insertion the probability is 80%. CONCLUSION: The Marburg double crown system is a versatile and successful means of achieving the long-term restoration of the partially edentulous jaw. Insertion and removal of the denture and routine oral hygiene are easy to perform, even for patients with limited manual dexterity. As a full-arch reconstruction, the MDC system enables easy adjustment, modification, and relining with low follow-up costs.     

Removable partial denture design: a study of a selected population in Saudi Arabia

Determination of the incidence of various classes of removable partial dentures (RPDs) including their designs and their comparison with previous studies provide clinically useful information for dental training and continuing education. The purpose of this study is to determine the pattern of partial edentulism, the major connector, clasping, and design of 740 cobalt chromium RPD frameworks constructed for a selected population in Saudi Arabia. RPD framework design information and patient personal data were obtained from the work authorization form and the dental records respectively. The relationship among age, sex, nationality, and various Kennedy classes of the RPDs was determined by chi-square statistical analysis. Results indicate that Kennedy Class III removable partial dentures were the most frequently constructed. Although gender had no significant relationship, age and nationality had statistically significant relationship with the distribution of various Kennedy classes of removable partial dentures. Lingual bars and anterior posterior palatal straps were the most commonly used mandibular and maxillary major connectors. Lingual and palatal plates, however, were more frequently used than any major connectors for distal extension RPDs. Comparison with previous findings confirms the established variation in designing RPDs. The distribution of partially edentulousness revealed the influence of the general pattern of tooth loss, which could be modified by patient's demands and socio-economic status. Practitioners need to avail themselves fully of basic RPD design principles concerning the most commonly encountered classes of RPDs.     

Oral health status of patients 5-6 years after placement of cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures

This study is a clinical survey of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) removable partial denture (RPD) wearers that aimed to investigate the effects of denture wearing on oral tissues. A random sample of patients who had received their dentures 5-6 years previously from a dental teaching hospital in Hong Kong was selected. Those who had been constantly wearing the RPDs were examined by one calibrated examiner under an optimal clinical setting. The patients' dental, periodontal and mucosal status were assessed. A total of 87 patients were examined. Mucosal lesions under the Co-Cr RPDs were uncommon in this study sample. However, there was a high prevalence of plaque, gingivitis and gingival recession, especially in dento-gingival surfaces in close proximity (within 3 mm) to the dentures. Thus, there is a special need for regular oral hygiene reinforcement, scaling and prophylaxis among RPD wearers. Despite a low caries incidence in the study sample, root caries were found to be associated with contact with the RPDs (P < 0.05) but coronal caries were not. It is recommended that coverage of the exposed root surfaces by RPD components should be avoided. Also, topical fluorides should be regularly applied onto exposed root surfaces as a preventive measure.     

Fabrication of a removable partial denture combining conventional and digital techniques

This article describes a combined conventional and digital workflow for fabricating removable partial dentures (RPDs). After scanning the dental cast and RPD framework assembly, artificial teeth and denture base regions were designed using computer-aided design software. The artificial teeth and denture base assembly was milled as a single structure by using a wax disk and then placed on the RPD framework. The artificial teeth were additionally milled from a polymethyl methacrylate disk. Conventional procedures were followed for denture investment until the wax elimination procedure, after which the assembly was replaced with the artificial teeth in the cope of the flasks, and the denture resin material was injected to process the RPD. This technique enabled the RPD to be fabricated in the same form as the design state.     

A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction between complete denture (CD) and Kennedy Class I removable partial denture (RPD) wearers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 156 CD and 112 RPD wearers took a part in this study. From the primary group of the examined patients, only those whose RPDs and CDs were assessed as excellent or very good by the dentist, took a part in this study. Patients graded satisfaction of their dentures by using an analogue scale from 1 to 5 (1=unsatisfactory; 5=excellent). RESULTS: Both CD and RPD wearers were mostly satisfied with their dentures (the distribution of the scores of the patients' assessments was skewed towards the highest scores; more than half of the patients scored all the examined variables to the best score category). Complete Denture wearers were significantly more satisfied with chewing, speech and retention of maxillary denture than RPD wearers (P<0.05). Removable partial denture wearers were significantly more satisfied with the retention and the comfort of wearing mandibular denture (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between CD and RPD wearers for general satisfaction with their dentures, aesthetics and comfort of wearing maxillary denture (P>0.05; N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of CD and RPD wearers were satisfied with the dentures. CD wearers were more satisfied with speech, chewing and retention of maxillary denture, while RPD wearers were more satisfied with the retention and the comfort of wearing mandibular denture. Different groups of denture wearers have to make significant, but different adjustments to wear their dentures successfully.     

Comparisons of tactile thresholds between implant-supported fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures.

This study compared the tactile sensitivity of splinted abutment and denture teeth of 16 fixed partial dentures (FPD) supported by blade implants and 16 removable partial dentures (RPD) in patients with Kennedy Class I and Class II edentulous conditions. No significant differences were noted between the tactile thresholds of the natural abutment teeth and artificial teeth in the FPD and RPD groups. The splinted abutment teeth required 45.4 g, or 5.4 to 5.8 times higher occlusal loads than did those needed for the comparable nonsplinted teeth, to detect the stimulus. A further increase of 54% in thresholds with the FPD and over 100% with the placement of the RPD indicated the superiority of the RPD in terms of load distribution as a result of the cross-arch splinting and mucosal support. Moderate positive correlations (r = 0.37 to 0.46; P < .05) between tactile thresholds and masticatory performance were found, signifying that reduced tactile perception was not responsible for the incomplete restoration of the masticatory function with RPDs or FPDs but might be contributing to increased masticatory performance within both treatment groups.     

The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth

BACKGROUND: A removable partial denture (RPD) is a common treatment available for restoration of partially edentulous ridges. Longitudinal studies indicate that RPDs have been associated with increased gingivitis, periodontitis, and abutment mobility. METHODS: A total of 205 patients with RPDs participated in this study. There were 80 males and 125 females aged 38 to 89, with 123 maxillary and 138 mandibular RPDs. Patients were wearing existing RPDs for different periods ranging from 1 to 10 years. A two-part questionnaire was devised for this study. In the first part, patients answered questions on gender; age; smoking habits; denture age; denture wearing habits; mouth odor; and problems with food accumulating under the denture base, on the outside surface of the denture, and on the outside surface of remaining teeth after eating. The Kennedy classification, material, denture support, denture base shape, and number of teeth in contact, number of existing clasps, and occlusal rests were categorized. The quality of denture construction was also evaluated. In the second part of the questionnaire, baseline recordings of plaque (PI), gingival (GI), and calculus (CI) indexes were made, and Tarbet index (TI), as well as probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), and tooth mobility (TM) were measured, both on abutment and non-abutment teeth. RESULTS: Significant differences (P <0.01) were noted for PI, Cl, GI, PD, TM, and GR between abutment and non-abutment teeth, with abutment teeth showing more disease. CONCLUSIONS: RPD design plays an important role in the state of the periodontium. Appropriate design and good oral hygiene may decrease the appearance of periodontal disease.     

Social and functional impact of reduced posterior dental units in older adults

The number of teeth needed to maintain adequate dental function in older adults is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between oral function and the number of opposing pairs of posterior teeth. We identified 338 subjects with complete anterior dentitions from an interview and examination survey of Ontario adults aged 50 and over; 261 had no partial denture and 77 had removable partial dentures (RPD). Oral function was measured using questions assessing chewing ability, mandibular function and socio-psychological impact.
Subjects with no partial dentures were further allocated to five groups, based on their dental status: complete dental arch ( n = 69); 5–7 functional units-pairs of opposing posterior teeth ( n = 109); 3 or 4 functional units ( n = 48) and 0–2 functional units ( n = 35). Oral function problems increased with decreasing functional units being markedly more prevalent among the groups with 0–2 functional units. 34% of subjects in the 0–2 group reported one or more problems with chewing ability compared to 6–17% in the other groups (χ² P = 0.001 d.f. = 3).
The 77 subjects who wore removable partial dentures, reported social and dental function at levels comparable to those with no dentures.
From these results, there appears to be little socio-functional need to replace lost posterior teeth with a partial denture until the person has fewer than, 3 posterior functional units. The low number of partial denture wearers limited our ability to detect a lasting benefit from RPD treatment.     

Cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in geriatric patients: a two-year study

The purpose of this study was to compare prosthetic, functional and occlusal conditions in twenty-seven patients treated with distally extending cantilever bridges and twenty-six patients treated with removable partial dentures (RPD) in the mandible. All patients had a complete upper denture. Mean age of the patients in both groups was about 69 years. The patients were under a supervised oral hygiene care throughout the 2-year study period. There were 6.9 +/- 1.7 mandibular teeth left in the bridge group and 7.5 +/- 1.7 in the RPD group and the mean number of posterior teeth (natural teeth/denture teeth/pontics) in occlusion was 4.1 +/- 1.1 and 7.3 +/- 1.4, respectively. During the study period signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction became significantly aggravated in the RPD group, P less than 0.05. A balanced occlusion in the muscular contact position was observed in 90% of the patients in the bridge group and in 76% of the RPD wearers. During the study period the need for dental or prosthetic treatment was negligible in the patients treated with bridges. In the RPD group, twenty-two teeth were restored with fillings due to caries and in eight patients major adjustments of the sublingual bar were necessary due to irritation of the oral mucosa. This study has shown that treatment with distally extending cantilever bridges in the mandible is a favourable alternative to treatment with removable partial dentures in elderly patients with a reduced dentition.     

弹性义齿与传统可摘局部义齿对牙周情况影响的比较

目的比较弹性义齿与传统可摘局部义齿对牙周组织健康的影响。方法选择12例牙列缺损病人。每例受试者同时制作一件铸造卡环活动桥修复体和一件弹性义齿。先后戴用两种义齿，对基牙临床检查和龈下茵斑检查。结果戴用铸造卡环活动桥后PLI高于戴用弹性义齿后。戴用弹性义齿后BI及龈下菌宽螺旋体比例略高于戴用铸造卡环活动桥后。其他指标两者无差别。结论弹性义齿卡环设计时应尽量减少覆盖牙龈的面积，避免卡环边缘终止于龈缘处。     

Effect of direct retainer and major connector designs on RPD and abutment tooth movement dynamics

Designs of removable partial dentures are suggested to affect the mobility of abutment teeth and removable partial denture (RPD) during oral functions. This study aimed to examine the effect of direct retainer and major connector designs on RPD dynamics under simulated loading. Six different Kennedy class II maxillary RPDs were fabricated on a maxillary model. These dentures involved 3 different direct retainers (wrought-wire clasp, RPA clasp, and conical crown telescopic retainer) and 2 different major connectors (Co-Cr major connector and heat-cured acrylic resin with a metal strengthener). Using an experimental model with simulated periodontal ligaments and mucosa that were fabricated using silicone impression material, three-dimensional displacements of the RPDs were measured under a simulated 30-N loading with a displacement transducer type M-3. Significant effects of "direct retainer design" on bucco-palatal displacements and "major connector" on mesio-distal displacements were revealed by 2 x 3 two-way analysis of variance of abutment teeth movements (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, analysis of variance of RPD displacements revealed significant effects of "direct retainer design" on corono-apical displacements and "major connector" on mesio-distal displacements (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively). Rigid direct retainers and rigid major connectors decrease the movements of both abutment tooth and RPD.     

Rotational path removable partial denture (RPD): conservative esthetic treatment option for the edentulous mandibular anterior region: a case report

It can be esthetically and financially daunting for patients to lose teeth in an anterior region of the mouth. For these patients, traditional treatment options presented in the past have included fixed partial denture, implants, and conventional removable partial denture (RPD). For patients faced with financial, anatomical, and/or esthetic limitations, the edentulous region can be restored successfully with a rotational path RPD. Rotational path RPD designs have often been overlooked by the dental profession due to its complex concepts involving the prosthetic design and sensitive laboratory techniques. With better understanding of the concepts and design, the dental clinician can deliver the highest esthetic outcome in compromised areas in which other treatment options may often face limitations. This paper reviews the method used to esthetically design and plan a posterior-anterior rotational path RPD in an edentulous mandibular anterior region for a patient missing the mandibular incisors. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Due to inadequate understanding of the mechanics of rotational path RPDs, many clinicians have not adapted the application of this advantageous prosthesis. When correctly designed and fabricated, the rotational path RPD provides improved esthetics, cleanliness, and retention for patients who may not be suitable candidates for implants or fixed partial dentures in tooth-supported edentulous regions.     

Clinical examination and interleukin-1beta levels in gingival crevicular fluid in patients treated with removable partial dentures

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to investigate the periodontal status and susceptibility to periodontal disease progression of the teeth in contact with removable partial dentures (RPD) and to compare them with control teeth in mouths not restored with a partial denture, by means of both clinical parameters and interleukin (IL)-1beta levels in gingival crevicular fluid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight periodontally healthy patients were selected for the study; 14 of them were treated with mandibular Kennedy Class I RPDs, and the other 14 patients were not restored for control. Clinical periodontal measurements were assessed, and crevicular fluid samples were collected from both abutment and control teeth to determine IL-1beta levels, which were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These procedures were performed both at baseline and 9 months after the insertion of the dentures. RESULTS: The wearing of RPDs resulted in statistically higher clinical scores and total IL-1beta levels compared to the baseline examination. In contrast, no statistically significant differences were found between baseline and 9-month examinations in the control group. CONCLUSION: RPDs are a risk factor for periodontal disease progression because of increased plaque accumulation associated with increased total IL-1beta levels and impaired clinical periodontal parameters.     

Wear of resin denture teeth in partial removable dental prostheses

PurposeTo investigate occlusal wear of resin denture teeth in partial removable dental prostheses worn by partially edentulous patients.MethodsThirty patients with partial removable dental prostheses were included in the study. Thirty-two patients with complete dentures served as a reference group. Occlusal wear after two years was evaluated indirectly using gypsum casts and a three-dimensional laser-scanner device. Overall wear of complete occlusal surfaces and maximum wear of occlusal contact areas were measured. Patient and prosthesis data were analyzed using univariate and multiple linear mixed models.ResultsOverall wear of denture teeth in partial removable dental prostheses was 91 (SD 85) μm, and maximum wear of occlusal contact areas was 329 (SD 204) μm (means and standard deviations). Average and maximum wear values for teeth in complete dentures were both lower than those for teeth in partial removable dental prostheses. However, differences between wear of different types of denture did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for gender, type of tooth, dental status of the opposing jaw, and antagonist material. Statistical analysis revealed that wear was greater for denture teeth occluding with ceramic crowns and/or fixed partial dentures as antagonists.ConclusionsResin denture teeth in partial removable and complete dental prostheses are subjected to clinically important occlusal wear that might destabilize occlusion and cause further problems. Patient-related factors and dental status affect wear behavior and should be taken into consideration when treating patients with removable dentures.     

Periodontal and Prosthetic Conditions in Patients Treated with Removable Partial Dentures and Artificial Crowns: A Longitudinal Two-Year Study

In the present longitudinal study the periodontal and prosthetic conditions in 30 patients treated with removable partial dentures and artificial crowns were followed over a period of 2 years. The patients were given individual instructions in oral and denture hygiene and adequate periodontal treatment before the prosthetic therapy was started. The removable partial dentures were carefully planned and designed. The patients were regularly checked, and necessary instructions, scaling and prosthetic corrections were undertaken. The patients cooperated excellently and no significant deterioration was found in the clinical periodontal status of the remaining teeth. Only a few carious lesions were registered. The present study does not support the opinion that a removable partial denture per se will cause periodontal and carious lesions. When teeth with artificial crowns were examined regarding the position of the crown margins it was found that clinically observable gingival inflammations tended to be greatest when the crown margins were subgingivally located. Some deterioration of the removable partial denture occurred during the two-year follow-up concerning preferably occlusion, articulation, stability and clasp retention.     

Present status of titanium removable dentures--a review of the literature

Although porcelain and zirconium oxide might be used for fixed partial dental prostheses instead of conventional dental metals in the near future, removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks will probably continue to be cast with biocompatible metals. Commercially pure (CP) titanium has appropriate mechanical properties, it is lightweight (low density) compared with conventional dental alloys, and has outstanding biocompatibility that prevents metal allergic reactions. This literature review describes the laboratory conditions needed for fabricating titanium frameworks and the present status of titanium removable prostheses. The use of titanium for the production of cast RPD frameworks has gradually increased. There are no reports about metallic allergy apparently caused by CP titanium dentures. The laboratory drawbacks still remain, such as the lengthy burn-out, inferior castability and machinability, reaction layer formed on the cast surface, difficulty of polishing, and high initial costs. However, the clinical problems, such as discoloration of the titanium surfaces, unpleasant metal taste, decrease of clasp retention, tendency for plaque to adhere to the surface, detachment of the denture base resin, and severe wear of titanium teeth, have gradually been resolved. Titanium RPD frameworks have never been reported to fail catastrophically. Thus, titanium is recommended as protection against metal allergy, particularly for large-sized prostheses such as RPDs or complete dentures.