Clozapine for refractory schizophrenia: the Illinois experience

Based upon the Illinois Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities' computerized clinical information system, with its integration of client-specific clinical data, a 5-year retrospective study was designed to determine the clinical effectiveness and economic impact of the use of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The study sample consisted of 518 hospitalized, treatment-resistant patients. At the end of 5 years, 78% were well maintained on clozapine. Two hundred forty-three patients had been discharged to the community, and 62 had been transferred for treatment of medical or surgical problems. Clozapine treatment was discontinued in 115 patients (22%). The drug was well tolerated, with a very low incidence of agranulocytosis. Cost savings resulting from the discharge of the 243 clozapine-treated patients amounts to approximately $20 million per year. A disease management algorithm has been developed allowing physicians to begin clozapine treatment for patients not successfully treated with 2 prior antipsychotic agents. Adherence to this protocol throughout the state's mental health system would result in even greater savings.     

Evaluation of refractory epilepsy treated with vagus nerve stimulation for up to 5 years

We assessed the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 64 refractory epilepsy patients. After implantation, intermittent stimulation was delivered and seizure frequency and severity were counted. Average treatment time was 20 months. Nineteen of 47 patients with partial seizures, five of nine patients with idiopathic generalized seizures, and five of eight patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had >50% seizure reduction. Side effects were mild. VNS is a safe and effective treatment for refractory epilepsy.     

The effect of long-term treatment with clozapine in schizophrenia: a retrospective study in 96 patients treated with clozapine for up to 13 years

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with clozapine in 96 schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients hospitalized at the Psychiatric Research Center in Uppsala during the period 1974-1986. All patients had previously been treated with different neuroleptics but with inadequate response or distressing side effects. The mean duration of the disorder at the start of clozapine treatment was 8 years and 9 months and the mean duration of the treatment 3 years and 11 months. Clozapine treatment was discontinued in 36% of the patients, mainly due to lack of efficacy, poor compliance or temporary withdrawal of the drug from the market in 1975. In two patients the reason was leukopenia or agranulocytosis. In another 10 patients a transient decrement of WBC was seen, which was normalized during ongoing treatment. Four patients died when on clozapine during the follow-up period, but no causal relationship to the treatment could be established. Eighty-five per cent of the patients could be discharged from the hospital. Of the 62 patients who were still on clozapine after 2 years, 18% had full time and 21% half-time employment. A global evaluation of the clinical efficacy revealed a significant improvement in 43% and a moderate improvement in 38% of the patients compared to previous neuroleptic treatments. Common but usually mild side effects were sedation, hypersalivation, weight gain, and obstipation. Four patients had grand mal seizures. No extrapyramidal side effects were observed during clozapine treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

奥氮平联合氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症顽固性幻听的临床研究

目的探讨奥氮平联合氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症顽固性幻听的临床疗效。方法选择2013-04—2014-05来院就诊的精神分裂症患者140例,随机分为治疗组(n=70)和对照组(n=70)。对照组采用奥氮平治疗,治疗组采用奥氮平联合氨磺必利治疗,治疗8周,观察比较2组在治疗前和治疗第4、8周末时临床疗效及不良反应情况。结果治疗组临床有效率(87.14%)与对照组(64.29%)相比差异有统计学意义;2组在给药后PNASS、AHRS和CGI评分均显著降低,治疗组在治疗4周和8周时与对照组相比,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组发生不良反应13例(18.57%),对照组46例(65.71%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论奥氮平联合氨磺必利治疗精神分裂症的临床疗效显著,安全可靠,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。     

Kidney functioning during lithium treatment: a prospective study of patients treated with lithium for up to ten years.

A cohort of 53 patients with affective disorders who originally carried through renal functional tests before start of prophylactic lithium treatment were followed up prospectively after an average period of 8.5 years (range 7-10 years). Ten patients who had continued lithium treatment were re-examined. In this subgroup, the glomerular function was unaffected by the treatment, whereas the average urine volume increased during lithium treatment (NS). Polyuria and low renal concentrating abilities were also found before start of treatment and these findings underline the importance of access to renal baseline information prior to lithium treatment.     

Amisulpride augmentation of clozapine: an open non-randomized study in patients with schizophrenia partially responsive to clozapine

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options are very limited for individuals with schizophrenia resistant to clozapine. We tested the hypothesis that amisulpride augmentation would lead to an improvement in these patients. METHOD: This was an open non-randomized study. Thirty-three patients with sub-optimal response to clozapine were commenced on amisulpride in addition to clozapine. Clinical status was evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months using the Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Calgary Depression Scale, Calgary Anxiety Scale and various side effect rating scales. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed 6 months treatment on clozapine and amisulpride. There was a statistically significant improvement in the mean scores for PANSS, SANS and GAS at follow-up and no significant changes in side effect ratings. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of amisulpride, in a group of patients partially or non-responsive to clozapine, may lead to a substantial improvement in positive and negative symptoms, without worsening the side effect burden.     

Clozapine in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia: Canadian policies and clinical guidelines.

Clozapine is an atypical neuroleptic agent that has recently become available in Canada with potential clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia, and in patients with schizophrenia neurologically intolerant to conventional neuroleptics. Although it causes few extra-pyramidal symptoms, the drug has a number of other adverse effects including a risk of agranulocytosis in one to two percent of all patients. Because of this, the use of the drug is permitted only if the white blood count is monitored weekly. The monitoring system, outlined in this article, requires a coordinated effort between clinical staff, pharmacy, laboratory and the Clozaril Support and Assistance Network. Clinical guidelines are proposed, detailing the indications and contraindications for treatment and the pharmacokinetics, dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions with clozapine. In addition, the economics, government policies and implications for future research are considered. Although there are administrative and clinical difficulties associated with its use, clozapine represents an advance in therapeutic research. Patients and family members will be inquiring about the drug and may deserve a trial. This article aims to inform Canadian mental health professionals about the safe and beneficial use of clozapine.     

Clozapine and risperidone: combination/augmentation treatment of refractory schizophrenia: a preliminary observation

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine and risperidone were the first two antipsychotic drugs of a new class of agents for the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. It has been suggested that refractory schizophrenic patients who fail to respond to neither clozapine nor risperidone may respond to a combination/augmentation strategy of both medicaments. METHOD: Three cases of individuals with unremittent schizophrenia treated via this combination are presented. Response was evaluated by clinical follow-up and PANSS rating scale. RESULTS: Good clinical results with no noticeable adverse side effects, ascertained by a reduction from baseline scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were obtained in all three patients. CONCLUSION: The findings from this pilot study suggest this combination as a possible therapeutic approach for treating resistant schizophrenic patients.     

Symptomatic remission in schizophrenia patients treated with aripiprazole or haloperidol for up to 52 weeks

BACKGROUND: The Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) has defined criteria for symptomatic remission based on achieving and maintaining a consistently low symptom threshold for at least six consecutive months. This analysis examined symptomatic remission in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia receiving either aripiprazole or haloperidol for one year. METHODS: Pooled data from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trials of aripiprazole and haloperidol in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia were analyzed. Measures of symptomatic remission were calculated according to RSWG criteria. RESULTS: Remission rates were significantly higher for patients treated with aripiprazole compared with haloperidol (32% vs 22%, respectively; p<0.001, LOCF). Among remitters, aripiprazole-treated patients achieved symptom criteria in a significantly shorter time than haloperidol-treated patients (log rank p=0.0024). For trial completers, remission rates were similarly high in both groups (aripiprazole, 77%; haloperidol, 74%). Regardless of treatment type, remitters received significantly higher global clinical ratings than nonremitters (p<0.0001). Aripiprazole was associated with a significantly lower rate of discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) than haloperidol (8.0% vs 18.4%, respectively; p<0.001) as well as lower concomitant medication use for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (23% vs 57%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Acutely ill schizophrenia patients treated with aripiprazole demonstrated a significantly higher rate of symptomatic remission across 52 weeks compared with haloperidol-treated patients. The similar remission rates among trial completers in both treatment groups, combined with fewer AE-related discontinuations and lower EPS medication use in the aripiprazole group, suggest that better tolerability with aripiprazole may have contributed to superior overall remission rates.     

Clozapine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia patients: a case series study

INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms have been observed in a substantial proportion of schizophrenic patients. There are some reports describing the appearance de novo or reemergence of preexisting OC symptoms under clozapine (CLZ) therapy. However, there are also reports describing a positive effect of CLZ therapy in OC schizophrenic patients. It seems that comorbid OC symptoms are common among CLZ-treated refractory schizophrenic patients and are likely to be an integral part of their illness. The complex nature of the treatment response in this group of schizophrenic patients is as yet unclear. The effects of CLZ on OC symptoms may vary, with evidence of improvement in some and worsening among others. METHODS: The present case series study describes our experience with CLZ as a sole agent (n = 10) or in combination with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 5), in schizophrenic patients with prominent OC symptomatology. RESULTS: Systematic analysis of clinical features of our patients, as well as findings in the literature to date, led us to suggest some factors that may predict response to CLZ treatment in treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients with prominent OC symptoms: 1) schizophrenic patients who began to exhibit OC symptoms within the course of the psychotic process need and might to be successfully treated with CLZ alone; 2) when OC symptomatology preceded the development of schizophrenic process, CLZ monotherapy is inefficient and may even worsen OC symptoms; therefore, it should be treated concomitantly with specific anti-obsessive agents; 3) in both groups there is a definite dose-related pro-obsessive influence of CLZ when it is given in high doses. DISCUSSION: Further controlled investigations in a larger cohort of OC schizophrenic patients are needed to substantiate our hypothesis. OCD:Obsessive-compulsive disorder OCS:Obsessive-compulsive symptoms SRI:Serotonin reuptake inhibitors     

Clozapine and haloperidol in moderately refractory schizophrenia: a 6-month randomized and double-blind comparison

BACKGROUND: Despite the demonstrated efficacy of clozapine in severely refractory schizophrenia, questions remain regarding its efficacy for primary negative symptoms, comparison with a moderate dose of a first-generation antipsychotic, and adverse effects during a longer-term trial. This study examined its efficacy in partially responsive, community-based patients, compared clozapine with moderate-dose haloperidol, and extended treatment to 6 months. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, 29-week trial comparing clozapine (n = 37) with haloperidol (n = 34). Subjects with schizophrenia who were being treated in community settings at 3 collaborating clinical facilities were enrolled. RESULTS: Subjects treated with haloperidol were significantly more likely to discontinue treatment for lack of efficacy (51%) than were those treated with clozapine (12%). A higher proportion of clozapine-treated subjects met an a priori criterion of improvement (57%) compared with haloperidol-treated subjects (25%). Significantly greater improvement was seen in symptoms of psychosis, hostile-suspiciousness, anxiety-depression, thought disturbance, and total score measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. No differences were detected in negative symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Subjects treated with clozapine experienced more excess salivation, dizziness, and sweating and less dry mouth and decreased appetite than those treated with haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a first-generation antipsychotic given in a moderate dose, clozapine offers substantial clinical benefits to treatment-refractory subjects who can be treated in the community. Advantages are seen in a broad range of symptoms but do not extend to negative symptoms.     

A 2-year study of patients up to 55 years of age with cerebrovascular disorders

During the years 1986, 1987, all patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) under 55, admitted to Department of Neurology Ljubljana were prospectively studied. The significant differences between this group and the group of patients with CVA in all ages were found in relation to sex, frequency of different forms of CVA, and early and late mortality.     

Ziprasidone vs clozapine in schizophrenia patients refractory to multiple antipsychotic treatments: The MOZART study

This 18-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy trial evaluated ziprasidone as an alternative to clozapine in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients. Patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, a history of resistance and/or intolerance to at least three acute cycles with different antipsychotics given at therapeutic doses, PANSS score ≥ 80, and CGI-S score ≥ 4. Patients were randomized to ziprasidone (80–160 mg/day, n = 73) or clozapine (250–600 mg/day, n = 74). On the primary ITT-LOCF analysis, baseline-to-endpoint decreases in PANSS total scores were similar in the ziprasidone (− 25.0 ± 22.0, 95% CI − 30.2 to − 19.8) and clozapine (− 24.5 ± 22.5, 95% CI − 29.7 to − 19.2) groups. A progressive and significant reduction from baseline in PANSS total score was observed from day 11 in both study arms. There were also significant improvements on PANSS subscales, CGI-S, CG-I, CDSS, and GAF, without between-drug differences. The two treatment groups had similar rates of early discontinuations due to AEs. AEs were mostly of similar mild-moderate severity in the two groups. There were also no detrimental effects on prolactin, renal and liver function, hematology, and cardiovascular parameters. However, ziprasidone but not clozapine showed a significant reduction of SAS and AIMS scores. Moreover, when compared with clozapine, ziprasidone also had a more favorable metabolic profile, with significant endpoint differences in weight, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In conclusion, this trial indicates that both ziprasidone and clozapine, having comparable efficacy coupled with satisfactory general safety and tolerability, may be regarded as valuable options for the short-term treatment of difficult-to-treat schizophrenia patients with a history of multiple resistance and/or intolerance to antipsychotics. The more favorable metabolic profile of ziprasidone may represent an added value that could guide clinicians, at least in the presence of patients at high risk for metabolic disorders.     

Clozapine in drug induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, placebo controlled study with open follow up

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of clozapine in drug induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: A four week, randomised, double blind, parallel comparison of clozapine and placebo, followed by a 12 week clozapine open period, plus a one month period after drug discontinuation, in 60 patients with PD. The primary efficacy outcome was the "clinical global impression scale" (CGI); the positive subscore of the "positive and negative syndrome scale" (PANSS) was used as the secondary efficacy parameter and the "unified Parkinson's disease rating scale" (UPDRS) and the "mini mental test examination" (MMSE) as safety outcomes. RESULTS: The mean (SD) dosage of clozapine was 35.8 (12.5-50) mg at the end of the double blind period. The mean (SD) scores on the CGI improved by 1.8 (1.5) for the clozapine group compared with 0.6 (1.1) for the placebo group (p = 0.001). The mean (SD) positive subscore of PANSS improved by 5.6 (3.9) for the clozapine group (0.8 (2.8) for the placebo group; p < 0.0001). At the end of the open period, 25 patients had completely recovered from delusions and hallucinations, and 19 experienced a relapse within one month after the clozapine washout period. The UPDRS motor and MMSE mean scores did not change significantly in either group. Somnolence was more frequent with clozapine than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine at a mean dose lower than 50 mg/day improves drug induced psychosis in PD without significant worsening of motor function, and the effect wears off once the treatment stops.     

Clozapine in schizophrenia patients with recurrent catatonia: report of two cases

Prolonged catatonia can be a source of extremely serious morbidity and mortality. Lorazepam is effective in rapidly relieving most cases of catatonia. Reports have also shown that second-generation antipsychotic drugs are also efficacious in relieving catatonia. This report describes two schizophrenia patients who demonstrated recurrent catatonic features mutism and stupor. Both patients were treated with lorazepam, diazepam or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Patient 1 responded well and rapidly to lorazepam each time catatonia happened; but catatonia recurred once a year under treatment with many antipsychotic drugs. Patient 2 had catatonia features associated with discontinuing or decreasing clozapine. With each recurrent episode, the duration of catatonia increased, requiring an increased dosage of benzodiazepine. The patient's response to lorazepam and ECT gradually decreased, until the patient had almost no response to lorazepam, diazepam or ECT. Both patients had no recurrence during a period of 2-year follow up with continuous clozapine therapy.