Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study

PURPOSE: To compare conventional B-mode ultrasonography (US) alone with the combination of conventional B-mode US and contrast material-enhanced (SHU 508A) late-phase pulse-inversion US for the detection of hepatic metastases by using dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent conventional US, US in the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A, and single-section spiral CT. US and CT images were assessed by blinded readers. Differences in sensitivity, specificity, and the number and smallest size of metastases at conventional and contrast-enhanced US were compared by using CT as the standard of reference. Lesion conspicuity was assessed objectively (quantitatively) and subjectively by one reader before and after contrast material administration. RESULTS: In 45 of 80 (56%) patients with metastases, more metastases were seen at contrast-enhanced US than at conventional US. In three of these patients, conventional US images appeared normal. The addition of contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity for the detection of individual metastases from 71% to 87% (P <.001). On a patient basis, sensitivity improved from 94% to 98% (P =.44), and specificity improved from 60% to 88% (P <.01). Contrast enhancement improved the subjective conspicuity of metastases in 66 of 75 (88%) patients and the objective contrast by a mean of 10.8 dB (P <.001). Contrast-enhanced US showed more metastases than did CT in seven patients, and CT showed more than did contrast-enhanced US in one of 22 patients in whom an independent reference (magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative US, or pathologic findings) was available. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US improved sensitivity and specificity in the detection of hepatic metastases.     

Improved imaging of liver metastases with stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of enhancement with the US contrast agent SH U 508A: early experience

PURPOSE: To see whether stimulated acoustic emission (SAE) in the liver parenchyma in the late phase of enhancement with SH U 508A increases the conspicuity of occult metastases at ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with known hypo- or hypervascular hepatic metastases underwent US after SH U 508A administration, after a delay of at least 5 minutes, to ensure decay of blood pool enhancement. In 16 patients with visible metastases, conspicuity was compared on registered SAE and gray-scale scans by two blinded readers and by using computerized analysis of relative gray-scale and color Doppler conspicuity scores inside and outside the lesion. In nine patients, areas suspected of being involved but without definite gray-scale masses were imaged in the same way. Paired sections were analyzed by two blinded readers looking for parenchymal color defects without corresponding gray-scale masses; nine control images from three healthy volunteers were also included. RESULTS: Intense, transient parenchymal SAE was seen in all subjects. All metastases appeared as areas of reduced or absent signal. The conspicuity score was 80% for SAE versus 9% for gray-scale US (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). SAE-specific defects were seen in all patients but in none of the volunteers. Metastases seen on SAE but undetectable on gray-scale images were proved in three patients. CONCLUSION: SAE with SH U 508A improves the conspicuity of metastases. SAE-specific defects may reveal isoechoic or subtle metastases.     

MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

The appropriate staging of malignant tumors is increasingly important as new therapeutic strategies develop. Because metastatic involvement of the liver in extrahepatic malignant disease may significantly change therapeutic approach, it is important to rule out such involvement with high confidence. Moreover, the differentiation between incidental benign lesions, such as hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), or adenoma, is of high interest. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved reliable for diagnostic work-up of the liver. Liver-specific contrast agents have been especially helpful in detecting and precisely characterizing focal liver lesions, but the use of these agents has been limited because it has not been possible to perform both proper vascular phase and liver-specific phase within a reasonable time frame and in a single examination after a single injection of contrast agent. However, the hepatobiliary contrast agent gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl (Gd-EOB)-DTPA now allows combined dynamic imaging and hepatocyte-specific imaging in one examination. Gd-EOB-DTPA can be injected as a bolus and shows the enhancement characteristics and vascularity of liver lesions. In the delayed phase, which is acquired most appropriately 20 min after injection, Gd-EOB-DTPA is taken up selectively by functioning hepatocytes. Thus, malignant liver lesions, e.g. metastases, are spared from contrast uptake of the surrounding liver parenchyma. These lesions are hypointense in contrast to the surrounding bright liver. We review the current literature and present a practical approach to Gd-EOB-enhanced MR imaging using imaging examples of patients with liver metastases.     

MR imaging of blood-borne liver metastases in mice: contrast enhancement with Fe-EHPG

To determine whether iron(III)ethylenebis-(2-hydrophenylglycine) (Fe-EHPG), a prototype hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging agent, can enhance the liver-to-tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) in models of liver tumors in mice, two types of cell inoculation were used: intrahepatic implantation of M5076 sarcoma and intrasplenic injection of colon tumor (C-26) or M5076 sarcoma. Significant enhancement of the liver-to-tumor C/N and/or improved visualization of small lesions was consistently observed on T1-weighted images obtained after injection of the contrast material. For intrahepatic implants, the C/N on postinjection T1-weighted images was superior to that on T1- and T2-weighted preinjection images. For the C-26 metastatic liver lesions of larger diameter (greater than 5 mm), the C/N on postinjection T1-weighted studies was superior to that on preinjection T1-weighted images but was comparable to that on preinjection T2-weighted images. However, higher C/N after administration of Fe-EHPG improved visualization of medium-sized (3-5 mm) and small (1-3-mm) metastatic lesions in both M5076 and C-26 models. These results demonstrate that MR imaging with appropriate hepatobiliary agents appears promising for early detection of liver metastases.     

Delayed enhancement of ascites following high-dose contrast CT for liver metastases

Enhanced ascites has been described as a pathognomonic CT sign of urinary-peritoneal fistula. We have seen two cases of slowly enhancing ascites demonstrated with delayed contrast CT in the absence of urinary-peritoneal fistula. Knowledge of this phenomenon is important because hyperdense enhanced ascites can simulate urinary-peritoneal fistula or intraperitoneal hemorrhage.     

对比剂扩散系数对结直肠肝转移癌中MRI不均匀强化的量化评估

目的描述并评价用一种简化模型定量检测结直肠肝转移癌内对比剂不均匀性扩散的可重复性。材料与方法本回顾性研究依托HIPAA,获得了医院伦理委员会批准     

Hepatic malignancies: improved detection with pulse-inversion US in late phase of enhancement with SH U 508A-early experience

Twenty consecutive patients with known liver malignancies underwent ultrasonography (US) in conventional B mode and in pulse-inversion mode in the late hepatic-specific parenchymal phase after intravenous administration of SH U 508A, a microbubble US contrast agent. Two experienced readers assessed subjective and objective conspicuity, number of lesions, and smallest lesion diameter in each mode. Subjective and objective conspicuity were improved with pulse-inversion mode, and smaller lesions were depicted with pulse-inversion mode than with conventional B mode, improving the detection of metastases less than 1 cm in size.     

Dual phase helical CT versus portal venous phase CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases: correlation with intra-operative sonography, surgical and pathological findings

AIM: To assess whether dual phase helical computed tomography (DPCT) of the liver improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases compared with portal venous phase (PVP) imaging alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DPCT was performed in 33 consecutive patients before laparotomy for resection of colorectal liver metastases. CT comprised 8-mm slice collimation with a pitch of 1 to 1.25; imaging was commenced 20-25 and 65-70 s after the start of injection of 150 ml of contrast medium at 5 ml/s to coincide with hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and PVP contrast enhancement, respectively. Four blinded observers independently reviewed the HAP, PVP and DPCT images recording the site and size of all lesions. Alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) methodology was used to analyse the results, which were correlated with surgery, intra-operative ultrasound and histology. RESULTS: The mean observer sensitivities for malignant lesion detection were 75.3% for DPCT, 69.7% for PVP imaging and 66.7% for HAP imaging alone. There was a statistically significant improvement in malignant lesion detection using DPCT when compared with PVP imaging alone (P < 0.05). The mean areas under the AFROC curves were 0.84 for DPCT and 0.82 for PVP (P < 0.03) imaging alone. CONCLUSION: The detection of colorectal liver metastases was marginally better with DPCT than with PVP imaging alone, but the discovery of additional lesions did not affect the management of any of the patients in this study.     

The value of mathematical modelling in understanding contrast enhancement in CT with particular reference to the detection of hypovascular liver metastases

OBJECTIVE: Few subjects in body imaging have generated such intensive debate as that surrounding the optimising of strategies for the detection of liver metastases using contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT). Despite this, research on the subject has been almost entirely focused on experimental studies, little attention having been paid to the value of theoretical analyses. The authors' aim was to develop a relatively simple and robust mathematical model which could be implemented on a personal computer. METHODS: Simple differential equations describing the distribution of contrast agent between intra- and extra-vascular spaces during an infusion are set up. An analytic solution is obtained for the plasma/blood concentrations as a fraction of time and a solution for the interstitial concentrations as a fraction of time is obtained by converting the differential equations to difference equations which are solved in a stepwise manner. RESULTS: Vascular and hepatic parenchymal enhancement-time curves are generated which are in close agreement with expectations. The model may be used to compare different infusion regimes, e.g. lower versus higher dose, faster versus slower infusions, monophasic versus biphasic infusions and scan start delay. The implications of the results of the model for clinical protocol design are discussed and the special value of spiral/helical technology indicated. CONCLUSION: A simple mathematical model has been developed to model blood and tissue contrast enhancement in CT during contrast infusion. The model clarifies a number of issues related to contrast enhancement regimes for the study of the liver and these have been discussed.     

Endogenous contrast MRI of cardiac fibrosis: Beyond late gadolinium enhancement

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of detection of cardiac fibrosis with MRI using current standards and novel endogenous MRI techniques. Assessment of cardiac fibrosis is important for diagnosis, prediction of prognosis and follow‐up after therapy. During the past years, progress has been made in fibrosis detection using MRI. Cardiac infarct size can be assessed noninvasively with late gadolinium enhancement. Several methods for fibrosis detection using endogenous contrast have been developed, such as native T₁‐mapping, T_1ρ‐mapping, Magnetization transfer imaging, and T₂*‐mapping. Each of these methods will be described, providing the basic methodology, showing potential applications from applied studies, and discussing the potential and challenges or pitfalls. We will also identify future steps and developments that are needed for bringing these methods to the clinical practice. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:1181–1189. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.