Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Navigation, mapping, and ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) can be difficult. Catheter navigation using external magnetic fields may allow more accurate mapping and ablation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of RVOT tachycardia ablation using remote magnetic navigation. METHODS: Mapping and ablation were performed in eight patients with outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias. Tachycardia mapping was undertaken with a 64-polar basket catheter, followed by remote activation and pace-mapping using a magnetically enabled catheter. The area of interest was localized on the basket catheter in seven patients in whom an RVOT arrhythmia was identified. Remote navigation of the magnetic catheter to this area was followed by pace-mapping. Ablation was performed at the site of perfect pace-mapping, with earliest activation if possible. RESULTS: Acute success was achieved in all patients (median four applications). Median procedural time was 144 minutes, with 13.4 minutes of patient fluoroscopy time and 3.8 minutes of physician fluoroscopy time. No complications occurred. One recurrence occurred during follow-up (mean 366 days). CONCLUSION: RVOT tachycardias can be mapped and ablated using remote magnetic navigation, initially guided by a basket catheter. Precise activation and pace-mapping are possible. Remote magnetic navigation permitted low fluoroscopy exposure for the physician. Long-term results are promising.     

Endocardial mapping of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia using noncontact activation mapping

INTRODUCTION: Activation mapping and pace mapping identify successful ablation sites for catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia. These methods are limited in patients with nonsustained tachycardia or isolated ventricular ectopic beats. We investigated the feasibility of using noncontact mapping to guide the ablation of RVOT arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine patients with RVOT tachycardia and three patients with ectopic beats were studied using noncontact mapping. A multielectrode array catheter was introduced into the RVOT and tachycardia was analyzed using a virtual geometry. The earliest endocardial activation estimated by virtual electrograms was displayed on an isopotential color map and measured 33 +/- 13 msec before onset of QRS. Virtual unipolar electrograms at this site demonstrated QS morphology. Guided by a locator signal, ablation was performed with a mean of 6.9 +/- 2.2 radiofrequency deliveries. Acute success was achieved in all patients. During follow-up, one patient had a recurrence of RVOT tachycardia. Compared with patients (n = 21) who underwent catheter ablation using a conventional approach, a higher success rate was achieved by noncontact mapping. Procedure time was significantly longer in the noncontact mapping group. Fluoroscopy time was not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Noncontact mapping can be used as a reliable tool to identify the site of earliest endocardial activation and to guide the ablation procedure in patients with RVOT tachycardia and in patients with ectopic beats originating from the RVOT.     

起源于左右心室流出道心动过速和早搏的射频导管消融治疗

目的 探讨射频导管消融（RFCA）治疗心室流出道特发性室性心动过速（室速）和室性早搏（室早）的临床效果、心电图及电生理特征。方法 58例患者中室速10例,室早48例。起源于右室流出道（RVOT）43例,左室流出道（LVOT）15例,其中起源于主动脉瓣上Valsalva左冠窦（LSV）12例。5例RVOT室速是在非接触标测系统Ensite3000指导下进行消融的。结果 （1）58例患者中55例成功,3例失败,9例复发。（2）其中1例患者术中出现急性心包压塞。（3）起源心室流出道的室速和室早具有典型的心电图特征,其中Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联单向R波是流出道室性心律失常的共同特点。（4）V1或V2导联的R波时限指数与R／S波幅指数可作为区别LSV与RVOT室速和室早的有效指标。结论 射频导管消融治疗心室流出道特发性室性心律失常是一种安全、有效的方法。非接触标测系统对于血流动力学不稳定的复杂性室性心律失常的标测与治疗具有重要的意义。     

Clinical usefulness of a multielectrode basket catheter for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia originating from right ventricular outflow tract

INTRODUCTION: It often is difficult to determine the optimal ablation site for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) when the VT or premature ventricular complex (PVC) does not occur frequently. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of a multielectrode basket catheter for ablation of idiopathic VT originating from the RVOT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation was performed using a 4-mm tip, quadripolar catheter in 50 consecutive patients with 81 VTs originating from the RVOT with (basket group = 25 patients with 45 VTs) or without (control group = 25 patients with 36 VTs) predeployment of a multielectrode basket catheter composed of 64 electrodes. Deployment of the multielectrode basket catheter was possible and safe in all 25 patients in the basket group. Ablation was successful in 25 (100%) of 25 patients in the basket group and in 22 (88%) of 25 patients in the control group. The total number of RF applications and the number of RF applications per PVC morphology did not differ between the two groups. However, both the fluoroscopic and ablation procedure times per PVC morphology were shorter in the basket group than in the control group (36.8+/-14.1 min vs 52.0+/-32.5 min, P = 0.04; 60.0+/-14.6 vs 81.5+/-51.2 min, P = 0.05). This difference was more pronounced in the 29 patients in whom VT or PVC was not frequently observed. CONCLUSION: The multielectrode basket catheter is safe and useful for determining the optimal ablation site in patients with idiopathic VT originating from the RVOT, especially in those without frequent VT or PVC.     

Nonfluoroscopic Three‐Dimensional Mapping for Arrhythmia Ablation: Tool or Toy?

INTRODUCTION: Conventional mapping and ablation rely on fluoroscopy, which can result in imprecise positioning of the ablation catheter and long fluoroscopic exposure times. We evaluated a nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional mapping system, termed CARTO, and compared the results of ablation using this technique with those of conventional mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the results of 88 arrhythmia ablations (79 patients) using CARTO with 100 ablations (94 patients) using the conventional technique. The ablations were separated into four groups: (1) AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT); (2) atrial tachycardia/flutter; (3) ventricular tachycardia (VT); and (4) bypass tract tachycardia. We compared the success rate, complications, and fluoroscopy and procedure times. The ablation outcomes were excellent and comparable in all four types of the arrhythmias between the two techniques. Major complications included one cardiac tamponade in each group and one second-degree AV block in the conventional group. Fluoroscopy time was shorter using the CARTO technique: 10+/-7 versus 27+/-15 minutes for AVNRT (P < 0.01), 18+/-17 versus 44+/-23 minutes for atrial tachycardia and flutter (P < 0.01), 15+/-12 versus 34+/-31 minutes for VT (P < 0.05), and 21+/-14 versus 53+/-32 minutes for bypass tract tachycardia (P < 0.01). Procedure times were similar except for the bypass tract patients, which was shorter in the CARTO group, 4+/-1.3 versus 5.5+/-2.5 hours (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The electroanatomic three-dimensional mapping technique reduced fluoroscopy time and resulted in excellent outcome without increasing the procedure time.     

Electrocardiographic characteristics of repetitive monomorphic right ventricular tachycardia originating near the His-bundle

INTRODUCTION: Most idiopathic nonreentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) arise from the right or left ventricular outflow tract (OT). However, some right ventricular (RV) VT/VPCs originate near the His-bundle region. The aim of this study was to investigate ECG characteristics of VT/VPCs originating near the His-bundle in comparison with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)-VT/VPCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety RV-VT/VPC patients underwent catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation. ECG variables were compared between VT/VPCs originating from the RVOT and near the His-bundle. Ten patients had foci near the His-bundle (HIS group), with the His-bundle local ventricular electrogram preceding the QRS onset by 15-35 msec (mean: 22 msec) and His-bundle pacing produced a nearly identical ECG to clinical VT/VPCs. The HIS group R wave amplitude in the inferior leads (lead III: 1.0 +/- 0.6 mV) was significantly lower than that of the RVOT group (1.7 +/- 0.4 mV, P < 0.05). An R wave in aVL was present in 6 of 10 HIS group patients, while almost all RVOT group patients had a QS pattern in aVL. Lead I in HIS group exhibited significantly taller R wave amplitudes than RVOT group. HIS group QRS duration in the inferior leads was shorter than that of the RVOT group. Eight of 10 HIS group patients exhibited a QS pattern in lead V1 compared to 14 of 81 RVOT group patients. HIS group had larger R wave amplitudes in leads V5 and V6 than RVOT group. CONCLUSION: VT/VPCs originating near the His-bundle have distinctive ECG characteristics. Knowledge of the characteristic QRS morphology may facilitate catheter mapping and successful ablation.     

Electrocardiographic predictors of failure and recurrence in patients with idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia and ectopy who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation

This study reports new electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of radiofrequency catheter ablation failure and recurrence in idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ectopy based on 91 consecutive patients. Procedural success and failure rates were 85% (77/91) and 15% (14/91), respectively. Twenty three percent (18/77) had recurrence during the follow-up period of 1 to 120 months (mean 56 +/- 31 months). Baseline RVOT VT/ectopy on 12-lead ECG taken prior to ablation from 91 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Ablation performed with RVOT ectopy (isolated ectopies, bigeminy, trigeminy, or couplets) as template arrhythmia was more likely to fail (30% vs. 8%, P =.02) as opposed to RVOT VT (sustained or nonsustained). VT/ectopy-QRS morphology variation was more observed in failed ablations (36% vs. 7%, P =.001). Significantly wider mean VT/ectopy QRS in leads I, II, AVR, V2, V3, V5, and V6 were noted in failed ablation group. Mean R wave amplitude reached statistical significance only in lead II (22.0 +/- 5.1 mV for failed vs. 17.8 +/- 5.2 mV for successful outcomes; P =.009). QRS morphologic variation (47% vs. 16%; P =.009) was the only statistically significant ECG to be more common in patients with arrhythmia recurrence. In conclusion, ablation with ectopy over VT as template arrhythmia, presence of QRS morphologic variation, wider mean QRS width, and taller mean R-wave amplitude in lead II were identified ECG predictors of failed RVOT VT/Ectopy ablation. The only ECG predictor of recurrence was the presence of RVOT VT or ectopy QRS morphologic variation.     

Ventricular tachycardias mimicking those arising from the right ventricular outflow tract

INTRODUCTION: Ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) arising from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has proven highly successful, yet VTs with similar ECG features may originate outside the RVOT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed the clinical, echocardiographic, and ECG findings of 29 consecutive patients referred for ablation of monomorphic VT having a left bundle branch block pattern in lead V1 and tall monophasic R waves inferiorly. Nineteen patients (group A) had VTs ablated from the RVOT, and 10 patients (group B) had VTs that could not be ablated from the RVOT. The QRS morphology during VT or frequent ventricular premature complexes was the only variable that distinguished the two groups. During the target arrhythmia, ECGs of group B patients displayed earlier precordial transition zones (median V3 vs V5; P < 0.001), more rightward axes (90 +/- 4 vs 83 +/- 5; P = 0.002), taller R waves inferiorly (aVF: 1.9 +/- 1.0 vs 2.4 +/- 0.5; P = 0.020) and small R waves in lead V1 (10/10 vs 9/19; P = 0.011). Radiofrequency catheter ablation from the RVOT failed to eliminate VT in any group B patient, but ablation from the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) eliminated VT in 2 of 6 patients in whom left ventricular ablation was attempted. CONCLUSION: The absence of an R wave in lead V1 and a late precordial transition zone suggest an RVOT origin of VT, whereas an early precordial transition zone characterizes VTs that mimic an RVOT origin. The latter VTs occasionally can be ablated from the LVOT. Recognition of these ECG features may help the physician advise patients and direct one's approach to ablation.     

Substrate in the interventricular septum for left ventricular and right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: ablation from the right side of the septum

Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial mapping demonstrated that in a substantial number of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) endocardial, intramural, and epicardial structures are involved in the substrate of the reentrant circuits. Both right and left ventricular breakthrough has also been described during VT originating in the interventricular septum. We report the case of a patient with a nonischemic left ventricular aneurysm presenting with a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) tachycardia and a right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia. Mapping from the anterior interventricular vein and the endocardium of the RVOT revealed mid-diastolic potentials at the epicardium of the LVOT and the endocardium of RVOT, where the criteria of central isthmus sites could be demonstrated. Ablation targeting an isolated late potential during sinus rhythm in RVOT eliminated both the LVOT tachycardia and the RVOT tachycardia. In this patient with a nonischemic left ventricular aneurysm, the substrate of a LVOT tachycardia and RVOT tachycardia is described, and successful catheter ablation of the right and left ventricular tachycardia from the septal wall of RVOT is reported.     

非接触心内膜激动标测系统指导消融右室流出道室性心动过速

探讨非接触心内膜激动标测系统(NMS)指导消融右室流出道室性心动过速 (RVOT VT)的临床使用价值。选择 12例RVOT VT患者在NMS EnSite 3000TM指导下进行电生理标测和消融治疗, 经股静脉将 9F64极球囊电极(Array)和普通 7F消融电极送至RVOT采集信号,计算机将采集到的 3 360个点的实时心内膜电图通过逆运算法处理后显示分析RVOT三维立体图上彩色等电势图,确定心动过速时心内膜最早激动点。在脱离X线时,由导航和定位系统实时跟踪导管位置变化,并实施靶点消融。9例能诱发出持续性或非持续性VT, 3例仅能诱发RVOT早搏。与以往传统方法消融的 19例结果相比较,心内膜最早激动时间 (EEAT)较体表心电图QRS波的起点提前(29. 4±12. 3msvs18. 7±8. 1ms,P<0. 01),放电部位减少 ( 5. 7±3. 4vs8. 2±3. 1,P<0. 05 )个,手术时间延长(246. 9±53. 0minvs190. 2±74. 6min,P<0. 05);X线曝光时间(44. 3±17. 5minvs57. 5±20. 1min)、即刻成功率(100% vs84. 2% )、6个月随访成功率(100% vs73. 7% ),没有显著性差异,P均>0. 05。结论:NMS指导消融RV OT VT安全可靠,靶点定位准确,且在提高远期成功率方面有优于传统标测方法的趋势。     

Electroanatomic mapping characteristics of ventricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVD) has been previously explored using entrainment mapping techniques but little is know about VT mechanisms and the characteristics of their circuits using an electroanatomical mapping system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping was performed in 11 patients with well tolerated sustained VT and ARVD. Sinus rhythm mapping of the right ventricle was performed in eight patients showing areas of low bipolar electrogram voltage (<1.2 mV). In total 12 tachycardias (mean cycle length 382+/-62 ms) were induced and mapped. Complete maps demonstrated a reentry mechanism in eight VTs and a focal activation pattern in four VTs. The reentrant circuits were localized around the tricuspid annulus (five VTs), around the right ventricular outflow tract (one VT) and on the RV free lateral wall (two VTs). The critical isthmus of each peritricuspid circuit was bounded by the tricuspid annulus with a low voltage area close to it. The isthmus of tachycardia originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) was delineated by the tricuspid annulus with a low voltage area localized on the posterior wall of the RVOT. Each right ventricular free wall circuit showed an isthmus delineated by two parallel lines of block. Focal tachycardias originated on the right ventricular free wall. Linear radiofrequency ablation performed across the critical isthmus was successful in seven of eight reentrant tachycardias. The focal VTs were successfully ablated in 50% of cases. During a follow-up of 9-50 months VT recurred in four of eight initially successfully ablated VTs. CONCLUSIONS: Peritricuspid ventricular reentry is a frequent mechanism of VT in patients with ARVD which can be identified by detailed 3D electroanatomical mapping. This novel form of mapping is valuable in identifying VT mechanisms and in guiding RF ablation in patients with ARVD.     

右室流出道心律失常的发作方式与单导管消融治疗

报道 33例右室流出道心律失常的发作方式与单导管消融治疗。 3例仅室性早搏 (简称室早 )发作 ,30例室早与室性心动过速 (简称室速 )或心室颤动 (简称室颤 )并存。其中室早合并短阵单形室速 17例 ,合并持续单形室速 6例 ,合并多形室速 4例 ,合并快速室速或心室扑动 2例 ,合并室颤 1例。单点穿刺股静脉后 ,行右房或心室造影 ,将单根多枚电极导管按需放置于右室心尖部或流出道 ,行电生理检查、起搏与激动顺序标测和消融治疗。结果 :消融成功 30例 ,成功率 91%。靶点电图较体表QRS波始点早 38± 12 .4ms。 12例成功靶点位于右室流出道游离壁、9例位于间隔部、5例在游离壁和间隔部作多点片状消融、3例位于肺动脉瓣上、1例在右室流出道间隔部和左室间隔部消融成功。操作时间 5 2± 2 2 .2min ,X线透照时间 2 6± 18.0min ,放电时间 373± 111.7s。术中 1例未诱发心律失常 ,未行消融。 3例发生并发症 ,2例终止消融。 1例右室流出道穿孔 ,心包压塞。 1例多形室速 ,消融中室早多次触发室颤。 1例剧烈胸痛 ,冠状动脉造影示前降支近端 5 0 %局限狭窄。随访 14± 4 .5个月 ,无死亡病例 ,3例复发 ,1例消融 3次均复发 ,复发率 10 %。住院总花费人均 9133± 12 0 0元。结论 :右室流出道心律失常发病形式多种多样 ,单导?     

Clinical and electrophysiological differences between patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.

AIMS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation is considered first line treatment for symptomatic patients with right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (RVOT). The role of ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is more limited. As such, differentiating between the two conditions is essential. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study compared non-invasive findings, magnetic resonance images (MRI), invasive electrophysiological characteristics, results of ablation and long-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients with RVOT (33) or ARVD (17). Structural abnormalities were uniform in the ARVD group; in addition 18 (54%) of the RVOT tachycardia group had MRI abnormalities. At electrophysiological study the tachycardia in the ARVD group displayed features of re-entry in over 80%, but behaved with a triggered automatic basis in 97% with RVOT. Ablation was complete or partial success in 12 (71%) patients with ARVD and ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurred in eight (48%). In the RVOT patients, ablation was a complete success in 97% with recurrent VT in 6%. Long-term success in the RVOT patients was 95% in both patients with and without MRI abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological characterization can differentiate ARVD from RVOT. The finding of abnormalities on MRI does not have any bearing on arrhythmia mechanism, acute or long-term success of RFA.     

射频消融治疗室性早搏触发特发性室性心动过速／心室颤动的病例分析

目的探讨射频消融治疗在室性早搏（室早）触发特发性室性心动过速／心室颤动（室速／室颤）中的作用。方法总结3例由室早触发室速／室颤的治疗经验,1例对室早进行射频消融（RF—CA）并植入心律转复除颤器（ICD）,另1例经射频消融未完全消除室早而选择植入ICD,第3例经射频消融成功消除室早,未再发室颤。结果随访2年,3例患者均存活,ICD未再记录到室速／室颤。结论在室早触发室速／室颤病例中,应分析室早与室速／室颤的相关性,给予个体化治疗,射频消融室早可以消除／减少晕厥和室颤的发作。     

Preferential conduction across the ventricular outflow septum in ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic sinus cusp.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the origin and breakout site of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the myocardium around the ventricular outflow tract. BACKGROUND: The myocardial network around the ventricular outflow tract is not well known. METHODS: We studied 70 patients with idiopathic VT (n = 23) or PVCs (n = 47) with a left bundle branch block and inferior QRS axis morphology. Electroanatomical mapping was performed in both the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and aortic sinus cusp (ASC) during VT or PVCs. RESULTS: The earliest ventricular activation (EVA) was recorded in the RVOT in 55 patients (group R) and in the ASC in 15 (group A). In all group R patients, the closest pace map and successful ablation were achieved at the EVA site. Although a successful ablation was achieved at the EVA site in all group A patients, the closest pace map was obtained at the EVA site in 8 and RVOT in 7 (with an excellent pace map in 4). The stimulus to QRS interval was 0 ms during pacing from the RVOT and 36 +/- 8 ms from the ASC. The distance between the EVA and perfect pace map sites in those 4 patients was 11.9 +/- 3.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular arrhythmias originating from the ASC often show preferential conduction to the RVOT, which may render pace mapping or some algorithms using the electrocardiographic characteristics less reliable. In some of those cases, an insulated myocardial fiber across the ventricular outflow septum may exist.     

Use of the Impella™ Microaxial Blood Pump for Ablation of Hemodynamically Unstable Ventricular Tachycardia

Impella? for VT Ablation. Ablation for ventricular tachycardia remains a challenge with suboptimal procedural success rates. One of the major causes of difficulty is precipitous hypotension when ventricular tachycardia is induced precluding even rapid mapping of the arrhythmia. We report the successful use of the Impella? microcirculatory axial blood flow pump in 3 patients with hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia that allowed successful completion of the procedure. In these 3 patients, there was no evidence of Impella?‐related valvular disturbance, iatrogenic ventricular arrhythmias, or interference with mapping and ablation catheter movement. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 458‐4, April 2010)     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by intracardiac echocardiography.

AIMS: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) frequently has an anatomical substrate. Identification of areas prone to arrhythmogenicity facilitates radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Furthermore, direct monitoring of complications potentially increases safety of RFCA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of guiding RFCA of VT with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), in order to improve outcome and procedural safety. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients (age 59 +/- 15 years) with drug-refractory VT of various etiologies were studied. VT mapping and ablation were performed using standard techniques. ICE was performed with a multifrequency (5-10 MHz) phased-array transducer positioned in the right ventricle. Twenty different VTs were treated (CL 352 +/- 120 ms, 2.0 +/- 0.9 VT per patient). LV a- or dyskinesia was identified in all post-infarct patients. In patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, right ventricular aneurysms and dyskinesia could be identified. In all patients catheter position and tip-tissue contact could easily be monitored with ICE. Procedural success (non-inducibility of hemodynamically stable VT) was achieved in all patients. Complications did not occur. CONCLUSION: ICE is feasible in guiding RFCA of VT of different etiologies. The use of ICE in adjunction with fluoroscopy and mapping procedures will facilitate treatment of VT and may contribute to the safety of the procedure.     

Acute coronary artery occlusion and ischemia-related ventricular tachycardia during catheter ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract

Coronary artery injury is a rare complication of catheter ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Furthermore, acute myocardial ischemia usually causes polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation. We herein describe a case in which catheter ablation for VT originating from the RVOT provoked ischemia-related VTs due to acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery.     

Substrate Characterization and Catheter Ablation for Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

VT Ablation in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy . Introduction: Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is uncommon in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The purpose of this study was to define the substrate and role of catheter ablation for VT in apical HCM. Methods: Four patients with apical HCM and frequent, drug refractory VT (mean age of 46 ± 10 years, left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction; 54 ± 14%) underwent catheter ablation with the use of electroanatomic mapping. Endocardial mapping was performed in 4 patients and 3 patients underwent epicardial mapping. Results: In 3 patients, VT was related to areas of scar in the apical LV where maximal apical wall thickness ranged from 14.5 to 17.8 mm, and 2 patients had apical aneurysms. Endocardial and epicardial substrate mapping revealed low voltage (<1.5 mV) scar in both endocardial and epicardial LV in 2 and only in the epicardium in 1 patient. Inducible VT was abolished with a combination of endocardial and epicardial ablation in 2 patients, but was ineffective in the third patient who had intramural reentry that required transcoronary ethanol ablation of an obtuse marginal vessel for abolition. The fourth patient had focal nonsustained repetitive VT from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), consistent with idiopathic RVOT‐VT, that was successfully ablated. During follow‐ups of 3‐9 months, all patients remained free from VT. Conclusion: Monomorphic VT in apical HCM can be due to endocardial, epicardial or intramural reentry in areas of apical scar. Epicardial ablation or transcoronary alcohol ablation is required in some cases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 41‐48, January 2011)