Immune checkpoint inhibitors and elderly people: A review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including targeting programmed cell death 1, programmed cell death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 pathways, are a new type of cancer treatment. This approach of targeting the immune system has demonstrated dramatic efficacy for several cancers, and various drugs have been approved by health authorities and are used in clinical practice. Elderly patients (≥65 years) represent most of the cancers diagnosed and deaths by age group, with an increase expected over the next decade. However, this subgroup of patients is under-represented in clinical trials. Ageing is also associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of the immune system and in alterations to it. Few specific trials have been carried out for immunotherapy in elderly people, with most patients considered to be fit. In this review, we discuss the impact of ageing and immunosenescence on immune system functions, and we assess the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients, principally from the data of pivotal clinical trials with subgroup analysis. Tolerance in elderly patients seems similar to younger people, but efficacy seems different between younger and elderly patients according to the type of cancer, some showing no difference and others less efficacy in the elderly subgroup. However, the numbers in elderly groups are small and more investigation is needed, with specific clinical trials for elderly cancer patients.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma

The position of immunotherapy as a pillar of systemic cancer treatment has been firmly established over the past decade. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a welcome option for patients with different malignancies. This is in part because they offer the possibility of durable benefit, even for patients who have failed other treatment modalities. The recent demonstration that immunotherapy is effective for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a milestone in the history of this recalcitrant disease. The treatment of HCC has been a challenge, and for many years was limited to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and to several novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors that have shown efficacy and have been approved. The current role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of HCC, and how this role is likely to evolve in the years ahead, are key. Other than efforts evaluating single checkpoint inhibitors, potential combination strategies, including combinations with existing local and systemic approaches, including novel therapies are evolving. This is understandably of special interest considering the potential unique immune system of the liver, which may impact the use of immunotherapy in patients with HCC going forward, and how can it be enhanced further.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials

Immunology-based therapy is rapidly developing into an effective treatment option for a surprising range of cancers. We have learned over the last decade that powerful immunologic effector cells may be blocked by inhibitory regulatory pathways controlled by specific molecules often called "immune checkpoints." These checkpoints serve to control or turn off the immune response when it is no longer needed to prevent tissue injury and autoimmunity. Cancer cells have learned or evolved to use these mechanisms to evade immune control and elimination. The development of a new therapeutic class of drugs that inhibit these inhibitory pathways has recently emerged as a potent strategy in oncology. Three sets of agents have emerged in clinical trials exploiting this strategy. These agents are antibodybased therapies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4(CTLA4), programmed cell death 1(PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1). These inhibitors of immune inhibition have demonstrated extensive activity as single agents and in combinations. Clinical responses have been seen in melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and several other tumor types. Despite the autoimmune or inflammatory immune-mediated adverse effects which have been seen, the responses and overall survival benefits exhibited thus far warrant further clinical development.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review of phase-3 clinical trials

BACKGROUNDThe outcomes of patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who are not candidates for local salvage therapy and of those diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic disease are dismal. A relatively new systemic therapy option that emerged in recent years in the treatment of advanced HNSCC is immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety profile and anti-tumor activity of these agents demonstrated in early phase clinical trials paved the way to the initiation of several promising phase-3 trials in the field.AIMTo evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of ICIs in HNSCC, based on published phase-3 clinical trials.METHODSWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus to identify published literature evaluating immunotherapy using ICIs in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC) and locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We used a combination of standardized search terms and keywords including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent, metastatic, locally advanced, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and phase-3 clinical trial. A sensitive search filter was used to limit our results to randomized controlled trials.RESULTSFive phase-3 clinical trials have reported the data on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HNSCC so far: Four in R/M HNSCC and one in LAHNSCC. In patients with R/M HNSCC, anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated improved survival benefits in the second-line treatment setting compared to the standard of care (standard single-agent systemic therapy). While the net gain in overall survival (OS) with nivolumab was 2.4 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, P = 0.01], that with pembrolizumab was 1.5 mo (HR = 0.80 nominal P = 0.0161). The anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab with or without the anti-cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 agent tremelimumab did not result in any beneficial outcomes. In the first-line setting, in R/M HNSCC, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in significant improvement in survival with a net gain in OS of 2.3 mo (HR = 0.77, P = 0.0034) in the overall population and a net gain in OS of 4.2 mo in the PD-L1 positive (combined positive score > 20) population compared to standard of care (EXTREME regime). In patients with PD-L1 positive R/M HNSCC, monotherapy with pembrolizumab also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in survival compared to EXTREME. In LAHNSCC, immunotherapy using avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 agent) along with standard chemoradiation therapy did not result in improved outcomes compared to placebo plus chemoradiation therapy.CONCLUSIONAnti-PD-1 agents provide survival benefits in R/M HNSCC in the first and second-line settings, with acceptable toxicity profiles compared to standard therapy. There is no proven efficacy in the curative setting to date.     

Tumor immune microenvironment and immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the main prevalent histological type of esophageal cancer, predominantly constituting 90% of cases worldwide. Despite the development of multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches, its prognosis remains unfavorable. Recently, the development of monoclonal antibodies inhibiting programmed death 1 (PD‐1) or programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) has led to marked therapeutic responses among multiple malignancies including ESCC. However, only a few patients achieved clinical benefits due to resistance. Therefore, precise and accurate predictive biomarkers should be identified for personalized immunotherapy in clinical settings. Because the tumor immune microenvironment can potentially influence the patient's response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor immunity, such as PD‐L1 expression on tumors, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor‐associated macrophages, and myeloid‐derived suppressor cells, in ESCC should be further investigated. In this review, accumulated evidence regarding the tumor immune microenvironment and immune checkpoint inhibitors in ESCC are summarized.     

肿瘤免疫检查点抑制剂耐药机制的研究进展

免疫疗法改变了癌症治疗的格局,免疫检查点抑制剂(immune checkpoint inhibitors,ICPis)的引入在提高晚期转移性癌症患者的总体生存率方面取得了巨大的成功.然而,只有较小比例的患者最初对这些抑制剂有反应,越来越多的临床证据表明,相当大比例的初始应答者最终在几个月或几年后因致命的抗药性而复发.因...     

A systematic review of adverse events in randomized trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors

The advent of immune checkpoint-inhibitors (CPI) has transformed treatment for several cancer types. This review was performed to assess the rate of adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of CPI, alone or in combinations. A review of AEs reporting quality was also performed. All publications of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) assessing CPI published before December 2017 were included. To investigate the quality of AEs reporting, a set of items was defined based on the 2004 CONSORT harms extension statement. Rates of Grade 5, serious, and study-withdrawal related AEs were collected in each treatment category. Specific immune related AEs (irAEs) were also collected when available. Pooled estimates of adverse event rates were calculated by using generalized linear mixed model. A total of 35 RCTs including 16,485 patients were included. The overall quality of AEs reporting was satisfactory, but items pertaining to methods of data collection and analysis were infrequently reported. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported for 14% (95% CI 12–16) of patients treated with PD(L)-1 inhibitors, 34% (95% CI 27–42) of patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors, 55% (95% CI 51–59) of patients on CPI combinations and 46% (95% CI 40–53) of patients on immunotherapy-chemotherapy combination. The profile of irAEs was different among the treatment categories. The use of CPI, especially in combination, is associated with significant rates of Grade ≥ 3 AEs. Healthcare planning should anticipate the expected high number of patients presenting with irAEs in the future.     

Integrated bioinformatics analyses of key genes involved in hepatocellular carcinoma immunosuppression

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a typical inflammation-driven cancer. Chronically unresolved inflammation may remodel the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which is rich in innate immune cells. The mechanisms via which HCC progresses through the evasion of the innate immune surveillance remain unclear. The present study thus aimed to identify key genes involved in HCC immunosuppression and to establish an innate immune risk signature, with the ultimate goal of obtaining new insight into effective immunotherapies. HCC and normal liver tissue mRNA expression and clinicopathological data were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The immunosuppressive innate immune-related genes (IIRGs) in HCC were screened using integrated bioinformatics analyses. Gene expression was then validated using the Gene Expression Omnibus database and the Human Protein Atlas database, and tissues were obtained from patients with HCC who underwent surgery. In total, 3,676 genes were identified as differentially expressed mRNAs after comparing the HCC tissues with the normal liver tissues in TCGA. Gene Set Enrichment Analyses revealed 21 highly expressed IIRGs in HCC tissues. A survival analysis and Cox regression model were used to construct an innate immune risk signature, including three IIRGs: Collectin-12 (COLEC12), matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP12) and mucin-12 (MUC12) genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses revealed that the signature of the three IIRGs was a robust independent risk factor in relation to the overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC. The expression of the three aforementioned IIRGs was confirmed through external validation. Moreover, COLEC12 and MMP12 expression significantly correlated with that of immune checkpoint molecules or immunosuppressive cytokines. The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion tool predicted that the increased expression of the three IIRGs in patients with HCC was significantly associated with the efficacy of relatively poor immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Conclusively, a novel innate immune-related risk signature for patients with HCC was constructed and validated. This signature may be involved in immunosuppression, and may be used to predict a poor prognosis, functioning as a potential immunotherapeutic target for patients with HCC.     

Safety,efficacy, and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of mortality worldwide with an increasing incidence due to escalating rates of obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Unfortunately, a majority of patients with HCC present with advanced disease. The immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab, anti-VEGF, has become the new standard of care for patients with advanced HCC after demonstrating improved overall and progression free survival over sorafenib. In this review, we discuss the evolving role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of HCC and their safety, efficacy, and tolerability.     

Revolutionizing the landscape of colorectal cancer treatment: The potential role of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the third cause of cancer-related mortalities worldwide. The progression of CRC to the metastatic phase significantly compromises the overall survival rates. Despite the advances in the therapeutic protocols, CRC treatment is still challenging. Cancer immunotherapy joined the ranks of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy as the fifth pillar in the foundation of cancer therapeutics. Interruption of the immunosuppressive signals within the tumor microenvironment and reactivation of antitumor immunity via targeting the molecular immune checkpoints generated promising therapeutic outcomes in several types of hard-to-treat cancers. The year 2017 witnessed the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy for the management of CRC. The approval was granted to pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic solid malignancies with mismatch-repair deficiency including CRCs. Such natively immunogenic tumors constitute only a minor percentage of all CRCs. Therefore, it is imperative to utilize novel combinatorial regimens to enhance the response of a wider range of CRC tumors to cancer immunotherapy and help in extending the survival rates in patients with advanced/metastatic disease. This review highlights the novel approaches under clinical development to overcome the resistance of CRCs to immunotherapy and improve the therapeutic outcomes.     

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期肝细胞肝癌治疗中的研究进展

晚期原发性肝细胞肝癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)的系统治疗主要包括靶向治疗、化疗以及免疫治疗。近3年,程序性死亡受体-1(programmed death receptor-1,PD-1)/程序性死亡受体-1配体(programmed death receptor-1 ligand,PD-L1)抑制剂在晚期HCC治疗中取得突破性进展。纳武单抗(nivolumab)和帕博利珠单抗(pembrolizumab)先后被美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准用于HCC二线治疗。多个PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合系统治疗的Ⅰ、Ⅱ期临床研究初步显示出较好的疗效和安全性。阿特珠单抗(atezolizumab)联合贝伐单抗一线治疗成为首个在Ⅲ期临床研究中证实优于现有标准治疗索拉非尼的全新疗法。本文就近年PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在晚期HCC治疗中的研究进展进行概述。     

Alpha-fetoprotein response predicts treatment outcomes in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors or locoregional therapies

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) along with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and locoregional therapies have been used increasingly to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Biomarkers are required to predict the treatment efficacy of ICIs with or without combination therapies in patients with unresectable HCC. This study enrolled 95 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC from May 2017 to June 2021 from two hospitals retrospectively. Of the 95 patients, 15 and 80 had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages B and C, respectively. The median ICI treatment duration was 3.43 (1.87-7.87) months, and 77 patients received combination therapies. Radiological imaging was not performed in 13 patients. Objective response and disease control rates were 27.4% and 53.7%, respectively. The duration of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.07 (1.59-6.54) months and 14.53 (6.93-22.14) months, respectively. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response was defined as a decline of >15% in the serum AFP level within the initial 3 months of ICI therapy according to Youden’s index. AFP response was determined to be a predictor of disease control (odds ratio: 11.657, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.834-47.941, P=.001). Macrovascular invasion (MVI), AFP response (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.488, 95% CI: 0.255-0.934, P=.030), combination therapy, and disease control were predictors of PFS, and MVI, AFP response (HR: 0.344, 95% CI: 0.160-0.737, P=.006), and disease control were predictors of OS. AFP response was a predictor of disease control, PFS, and OS. These findings indicate that AFP response can serve as a biomarker to predict treatment outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC receiving ICIs with or without TKIs or locoregional therapies.     

Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Primed to make a difference?

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a dismal prognosis and the current treatment is limited to sorafenib, an agent with modest benefit. Preclinical data have indicated that several immunologic mechanisms are at play to promote HCC development and growth while impairing effective antitumor immune surveillance. Several novel approaches geared toward manipulating the immune response to HCC have suggested a therapeutic benefit in early‐stage clinical trials, indicating a real potential to augment tumor‐specific immunity and improve outcomes in patients with this disease. In the current study, the authors reviewed the barriers to an effective immune response against HCC and contemporary clinical investigations that may be “primed” to alter the natural history of HCC. Cancer 2016;122:367–377. © 2015 American Cancer Society.     

Senescence markers: Predictive for response to checkpoint inhibitors

Recent studies suggest that the age-related remodeling of the immune system, known as immunosenescence, could impact the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in leukemia or nonsmall cell lung cancer. We investigated whether senescence markers can predict response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma patients. The peripheral blood of patients with newly diagnosed, untreated metastatic melanoma was analyzed by flow cytometry to correlate the frequency of senescence markers with clinical response as measured by RECIST after 12 weeks of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The loss of surface markers CD27 and CD28 or the expression of Tim-3 and CD57 on T cells was associated with resistance to checkpoint inhibitor blockade, presenting these phenotypes as possible predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Immunosenescence seems to impact on the response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma patients. Thus, lymphocyte phenotyping for senescence markers, with the introduction of immunosenescence panels, could be predictive for checkpoint inhibitor response.     

Immune checkpoint inhibitor‐related cutaneous adverse events

Cutaneous toxicities are the most prevalent immune‐related adverse events. Various reactions have been reported. In this review, we summarized the clinicopathologic manifestations, treatment strategies, relevance to tumor outcomes, and rechallenge considerations of cutaneous immune‐related adverse events.     

Adaptive immunity in hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world and has a poor prognosis. Host immunity can either protect or promote tumor growth by the predominance and activation of certain subsets of immune cells. It has been established that antigens such as AFP, MAGE, glypican 3 and NY-ESO, which are highly expressed in HCC, are potential targets for T-cell responses. Several studies have come to the conclusion that cytotoxic T-cell infiltration of the tumors is indicative of a better survival, whereas the predominance of suppressor cells is associated with a worse outcome and lower survival rates. Finally, certain therapeutic strategies, including radiofrequency ablation and chemoembolization, can enhance the release and exposure of tumor antigens, which might help to overcome the immune tolerance towards the tumor. Therefore, such immune-stimulating therapeutic interventions in combination with immunotherapy strategies represent a promising future approach for HCC treatment.     

Association of KDR mutation with better clinical outcomes in pan-cancer for immune checkpoint inhibitors

Kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) activation is associated with the immunosuppressive microenvironment. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with KDR mutations is still unclear. To investigate the relationship between KDR gene mutations and the prognosis of pan-cancer, and whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may improve the prognosis of patients with KDR mutations, we analyzed public cohorts of pan-cancer immunotherapeutic patients including genomic and clinical data.Further analysis was performed on an internal validation data set including 67 non-small cell lung cancer. Through bioinformatics analysis, potential mechanism was studied in TCGA data. We found better responses to ICIs in patients with KDR mutation from pan-cancer public datasets (objective response rate [ORR], 45.0% vs 25.1%, P=0.0058; progression-free survival [PFS], P=0.039, HR=0.586, 95% CI 0.353-0.973) and validation cohort (overall survival (OS), P=0.05, HR=0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-1.00). Our NSCLC cohort verified the value of KDR mutation in predicting better clinical outcomes, including ORR (70.0% vs 22.81%, P=0.0057) and PFS (HR=0.158; 95% CI, 0.045-0.773, P=0.007). KDR mutation was associated with tumor mutation burden high, neoantigen burden and immune cellular activities. Meanwhile, KDR mutation was indicative of an immune-hot status, characterized by higher expression of PD-L1 and abundance of cytotoxic lymphocytes. KDR mutations may be potential positive predictors for pan-cancer received ICIs.