Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Background. This phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of a low dose of docetaxel plus a standard dose of cisplatin for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. Eligibility criteria included metastatic disease (stage IV) of NSCLC and a performance status (PS) of 0-2. Cisplatin 80 mg/m² was given i.v. on day 1 and docetaxel 60 mg/m² was given i.v. on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. Results. Forty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and the median age was 63 years. Forty-two patients (93%) had a PS of 0-1 and 38 (84%) received two to four courses of chemotherapy. The principal toxicity was neutropenia, and grade 3/4 occurred in 36%/49%. Other hematologic toxicities were mild. Of the 45 patients, subsequent chemotherapy was delayed due to toxicities in only 5 patients (11%), and dose modifications were needed in only 3 patients (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Non-hematological toxicities were relatively mild. Allergy (2%), skin rash (11%), edema (9%), and neuropathy (9%) occurred infrequently, and all were grade 1 toxicity. Of the 45 patients, 19 showed partial response, giving a response rate of 42%. The median survival time was 43.3 weeks, and the 1-year survival rate of all patients was 38.7%. Conclusion. This cisplatin/docetaxel combination chemotherapy is an active and non-toxic regimen in patients with metastatic NSCLC, a result which suggests that the combination may be suitable for randomized controlled trials. Received: February 24, 2000 / Accepted: June 2, 2000     

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in metastatic or unresectable localized non-small-cell lung cancer

Methods. Newly diagnosed, chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC (measurable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC; Karnofsky performance status, 70–100; adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic, and cardiac function) were eligible for the study. Docetaxel 75 mg/m² was administered IV over 1 h, followed immediately by cisplatin 75 mg/m², given IV over 30 min, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks, for up to six or nine cycles. Results. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and treated. Their median age was 59 years (range, 32–71 years) and median performance status, 90 (range, 70–100). Histologically, 23 patients (59%) had adenocarcinoma, 12 (30.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma, and 16 patients (41%) had stage IV disease. Thirty-seven patients were eligible for inclusion. In the 39 patients evaluable for safety, significant grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (82%), nausea (10.3%), fatigue (10.3%), and diarrhea (7.7%). Of the 33 patients evaluable for response, 16 patients (48.5%) achieved a partial response and 7 showed progressive disease. Median overall survival time in all eligible patients was 10.5 months. Conclusion. Docetaxel/cisplatin produced promising response rates that compare favorably with those of current standard platinum combinations, with manageable toxicity. Further investigations of this first-line combination in NSCLC are warranted. Received: September 5, 2001 / Accepted: January 28, 2002     

A triplet chemotherapy with cisplatin, docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

Purpose We conducted a phase I/II study of triplet chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (CDDP), docetaxel (DCT) and gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Fifty-three untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. All drugs were given on days 1 and 8. The doses of CDDP and DCT were fixed at 40 mg/m² and 30 mg/m², respectively. In the phase I portion, a dose escalation study of GEM with starting dose of 400 mg/m² was conducted and primary objective in the phase II portion was response rate. Results The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of GEM were determined as 800 mg/m² because grade 3 non-hematological toxicity (liver damage, diarrhea, and fatigue) developed in three of nine patients evaluated at that dose level. In pharmacokinetic analysis, C _max and AUC of dFdC and dFdU were increased along with the dose escalation of GEM. However, no relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity or response was observed. Objective response rate was 34% and median survival time was 11.7 months. Though major toxicity was myelosuppression, there were no life-threatening toxicities. Conclusion These results indicate that this triplet chemotherapy is feasible and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of cisplatin on day 1 and docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for the treatment of previously untreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods A group of 38 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had not received prior treatment and who were aged under 75 years were enrolled. The patients received intravenous infusions of docetaxel (25 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m², day 1), followed by a week of rest.Results Six patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia (18%), but there were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Nonhematologic toxicities were also mild. There were 12 partial responses for an objective response rate of 31.6%. The median survival was 11.8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 46.5%.Conclusion Cisplatin combined with weekly administration of docetaxel is efficacious against NSCLC with low hematotoxicity, and this schedule may be an alternative for the treatment of NSCLC.     

Phase II study of the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine for the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods Eligible patients were those with measurable NSCLC. They were treated with two or more cycles of a regimen consisting of vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks.Results A total of 45 patients were enrolled. The response rate was 51.1% (23/45; 95% CI 35.8% to 66.3%). The median survival was 286 days with a 1-year survival rate of 40%. The median number of treatment cycles was 2. The major toxic effect was neutropenia of grade 3 or higher (84%). Nonhematological toxicities, including vomiting (62%), were mild (grade 2 or less). There were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion The high response rate and good tolerability proved this combination therapy to be a safe and effective treatment for advanced NSCLC.This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Health and Welfare (Tokyo, Japan) and from the Second Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control.     

Phase I/II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background. This trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and principal toxicities of combinations of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy, and to find suitable doses for phase II studies in Japanese subjects. Methods. Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 according to the World Health Organization classification, but previously untreated with chemotherapy received docetaxel followed by carboplatin, each infused over a 1-h period. The carboplatin dose was based on the target area under the curve (AUC), using Calvert's formula. Dose levels studied were: docetaxel (mg/m²)/carboplatin AUC (mg/ml·min), 50/4, 60/4, and 60/5, repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support was first used when dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were encountered. Results. Of 14 patients entered, 12 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD schedule was: docetaxel, 60 mg/m², with carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/ml·min (DLTs in 3 of 3 patients). The recommended dosage was: docetaxel, 60 mg/m², with carboplatin, AUC 4 mg/ml·min (DLTs in 2 of 6 patients). The main toxic effect was neutropenia, and any nonhematologic toxic effects were mild. No thrombocytopenia occurred. Six of the 12 patients (50%) showed responses; 4 of the 6 at the recommended doses. Conclusion. Docetaxel 60 mg/m², given over a 1-h period, followed by carboplatin, AUC 4 mg/ml·min, given over a 1-h period, is recommended for phase II studies in Japan. This combined chemotherapy has mild toxicity, except for neutropenia, and is useful and easy to administer. We therefore believe that phase II and phase III studies of this therapy would be well justified. Received: October 4, 1999 / Accepted: June 28, 2000     

Phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background The combination of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is considered as a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the frequent interaction of anticancer agents and irradiation may produce stronger radio-sensitizing effects, the daily administration of these agents is complicated. We therefore used weekly administration of these agents, and conducted a phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent TRT. The purpose of this study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended dose of this treatment. Methods Patients with locally advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Both cisplatin and vinorelbine were given intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks, starting on the first day of TRT, i.e., on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. The total dose of TRT was 60 Gy. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 20 mg/m² per week. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m² per week (dose level 1). Results Nine patients were enrolled in this study. All three patients at dose level 1 experienced DLTs. We decreased the dose of vinorelbine to 10 mg/m² per week (dose level 0). Two of the six patients at dose level 0 experienced DLTs. Therefore, dose level 1 was considered as the MTD, and dose level 0 as the recommended dose. The DLTs of this treatment were esophagitis, fatigue, infection, and hyponatremia. Conclusion The recommended dose of cisplatin is 20 mg/m² per week and that of vinorelbine is 10 mg/m² per week with standard TRT. A phase II study of this treatment is warranted. The results of this study were presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Lung Cancer Society in Fukuoka, Japan, November 21–22, 2002.     

Phase II study of oral S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of oral S-1 in combination with cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and materials

S-1 (50 mg/m²) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, with cisplatin (40 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks, for 2–4 cycles. Thoracic radiation therapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions five times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was the response rate, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival and safety.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 87.8% (98% CI: 77.8–97.8%). The median progression-free survival was 467 days (15.4 months), and the median survival time was 904 days (29.7 months). The overall survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 85.7% and 52.9%, respectively. Hematological toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (17%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (27%). No grade 3 febrile neutropenia was detected, and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were also mild. A grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage was observed in one patient.

Conclusions

The combination of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a promising treatment with a high efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.     

Clinical and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Purpose To evaluate the usefulness and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Patients and methods Chemotherapy-naive elderly patients (aged at least 76 years) with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer were accrued. Eligible patients received at least two cycles of docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m² on day 1 over 1 h every 3 weeks. Patients who were considered ineligible for this study were also registered. Symptom control was assessed using a questionnaire during the treatment period. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were evaluated in the first cycle of chemotherapy.Results Of 35 elderly patients, 15 (43%) met the study eligibility criteria. The reasons for ineligibility consisted mainly of poor performance status, poor bone marrow function, and hypoxemia (six patients each). A total of 49 cycles of chemotherapy (median 2 cycles, range 1–12 cycles) were administered to the eligible patients, six of whom achieved a partial response (overall response rate 40%, 95% confidence interval 15–65%). The major toxicity was hematologic, with grade 3 or greater neutropenia and grade 3 neutropenic fever developing in 13 patients (87%) and five patients (33%), respectively. Symptoms, as assessed in terms of the symptom control score, did not clearly decline during the treatment period. The values (mean±SD) of C_max, AUC_0inf, and t_1/2 were 1.35±0.32 g/ml, 1.79±0.52 g h/ml, and 4.1±2.3 h, respectively.Conclusions Although the validity of the results of this study is limited due to the small sample size, docetaxel appears effective in selected elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.     

泰索帝每周给药联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的确定泰索帝每周给药联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的最大耐受剂量（MTD）和剂量限制毒性（DLT）,观察其疗效（RR）和安全性,并进行药代动力学研究。方法泰索帝每周给药,连用3周,休息1周,顺铂每周期的第1天给药;每28d为1个治疗周期。顺铂的剂量为75mg／m^2。泰索帝在Ⅰ期临床阶段共有4个剂量组：25mg／m^2、30mg／m^2、35mg／m^2和40mg／m^2,每个剂量组至少人选3例患者。在Ⅱ期临床阶段,根据Ⅰ期临床推荐剂量,泰索帝35mg／m^2每周给药。药代动力学为第一周期第1天和第15天抽取血样待分析。根据Ⅰ期临床研究推荐剂量,进行Ⅱ期临床研究。结果Ⅰ期临床的15例患者中,有14例可评价疗效,其中5例部分缓解,有效率为35．7％,其中位生存时间16个月（范围5-40个月）。1、2、3年生存率分别为73．3％、26．6％和20．0％。中位疾病进展时间9个月（6～14个月）。Ⅱ期临床研究的83例初治的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者共接受了216个周期的化疗,可评价者75例。有1例患者完全缓解,22例患者部分缓解,占全部人组病例的27．7％（23／83）,占可评价病例的30．7％（23／75）;其中位生存时间为10．7个月（范围3—34个月）,1年生存率为48．6％。主要不良反应为Ⅲ-Ⅳ度的粒细胞减少以及乏力、指甲毒性及液体潴留。结论泰索帝（35mg／m^2）每周给药联合顺铂（75mg／m^2）作为一线方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,疗效较好,骨髓毒性较小。     

A phase I study of irinotecan and infusional cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

 A phase I study was performed to establish the optimum dose for combination therapy with infusional cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The subjects were 20 patients with a performance score of 0–2 with untreated advanced NSCLC. Cisplatin was administered by 5-day continuous intravenous infusion at 20–25 mg/m² per day. CPT-11 was administered by bolus infusion at a starting dose of 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 or 60 mg/m² per day on day 1 alone, followed by serial increments of 20 mg/m². Since grade 4 granulocytopenia was observed in two of the five patients receiving 20 mg/m² per day cisplatin (days 1–5) and 100 mg/m² CPT-11 (day 1), and since one of them developed severe pneumonia and sepsis associated with the granulocytopenia, the regimen was considered to be intolerable. In the same patient, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea were observed. Therefore, the optimum dose appeared to be 20 mg/m² per day (days 1–5) for cisplatin and 80 mg/m² (day 1) for CPT-11. The side effects were grade 2 diarrhea in one of three patients, and grade 2 vomiting in three patients, but grade ≥2 hemotoxicity was not observed. This combined regimen resulted in a partial response in 9 out of 19 assessable patients. The dose-limiting factor in this combination therapy was granulocytopenia, and a high efficacy rate was obtained. Received: 14 August 1995 / Accepted: 3 June 1996     

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose: Docetaxel, as a single agent, has demonstrated activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer and cisplatin has shown lack of overlapping toxicities with docetaxel. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and the toxicity of a combination regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer who have never been treated with palliative chemotherapy. Methods: Ninety-two patients with metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled from April 2000 to March 2004. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, no prior palliative chemotherapy and at least 6 months from the end of adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible for study entry. Docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m² were given on day 1. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The objective response was evaluated after three cycles of chemotherapy. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria scale version 2.0. Results: In total, 401 cycles were administered, with a median of 5 cycles per patient (range 1–9 cycles). The median age was 56 years (range 31–76). Eighty-six patients were evaluable for treatment response. The objective response rate was 43.5% (95% CI, 33.4–53.6) with one complete response and 39 partial responses. Twenty patients (21.7%) had stable disease and 26 patients (28.3%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0–9.0) and the median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.5–13.4). The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.4%), nausea/vomiting (13.0%) and diarrhea (7.6%). Conclusion: The combination chemotherapy of docetaxel with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer was tolerable for most patients and showed a promising antitumor activity as a first-line therapy.Keon Woo Park and Jin Seok Ahn contributed equally to this work.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: Both paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) have a significant activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Weekly administration of P is active, is dose intense, and has a favorable toxicity profile. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly P and C in advanced-stage NSCLC, we initiated this phase II study in patients with advanced NSCLC (III B with pleural effusion and stage IV). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m² intravenously (iv) over 1 h followed by carboplatin AUC 2 iv over 30 min. This treatment was administered weekly for 3 of every 4 wk until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Results: Of the 30 patients enrolled in the study, one patient did not meet the eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 29 patients, 6 did not complete at least two cycles of treatment and hence were not assessable for response. The overall response rate was 43.5% (10/23) (all partial responses). An additional 43.5% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 162 d and the median duration of response was 169 d. Overall survival at 1 yr on intent-to-treat analyses was 44% and median survival was 10.8 mo. We observed the following grade 3/4 toxicities: hypersensitivity to paclitaxel (13%), hypersensitivity to carboplatin (3%), neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (7%); 31% experienced grade 1 neuropathy and 17% experienced grade 2 neuropathy. Conclusions: We conclude that weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin is active and very well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Carboplatin and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study

Background To evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin and docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods In a phase II study, patients with inoperable stage IIIB or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (ECOG performance status of 0 or 1) were treated with the combination of carboplatin AUC 5 mg/ml·min and docetaxel 80 mg/m² administered once every 3 weeks.Results A total of 45 patients were accrued to the study. The median age was 62 years and adenocarcinoma was the most common histology. Patients received a median of four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate was 29% with a median survival of 11.9 months among evaluable patients. The 1-year survival rate was 47%. Febrile neutropenia (17%) was the most common hematological toxicity associated with the regimen whereas grade 3 fatigue (4%) was the major nonhematological toxicity.Conclusions The combination of carboplatin plus docetaxel is well tolerated and is effective for the treatment of patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.This work was supported in part by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.     

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan with filgrastim support in pretreated breast and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I study

Background Docetaxel (DTX) has been shown to be a very active drug in both breast cancer (BC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Irinotecan (CPT-11) is also active in NSCLC, and has shown promising antitumor activity in pretreated BC.Purpose To define the MTDs of these two drugs given together every other week with the use of filgrastim support in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients.Patients and methods Patients (aged 18–70 years, performance status 2) with advanced NSCLC or BC who had received at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were candidates for this phase I study. The starting DTX and CPT-11 doses were 60 mg/m² and 80 mg/m². Doses were alternately escalated at each step by 10 mg/m² for both drugs. Filgrastim 300 g/day was given subcutaneously from days 4 through 7 of each cycle.Results From April 2000, 41 patients were included in the trial (27 BC, 14 NSCLC). All BC patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel (with or without cisplatin) as first-line treatment. Of the 14 NSCLC patients, 12 had received cisplatin-based first-line therapy, and 8 patients had been pretreated with paclitaxel. The dose escalation proceeded through five dose levels up to DTX and CPT-11 doses of 80 mg/m² and 100 mg/m², respectively. Overall, ten patients showed dose-limiting toxicity during the first cycle, diarrhea in seven and neutropenia in the remaining three. Considering all 218 cycles delivered, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (34%), with only one episode of neutropenic fever, while severe diarrhea was observed in 9 patients (23%). A total of 21 objective responses were registered (four complete) for an overall response rate of 51% [95% CI 35–67]. A major response was seen in 16 of the 27 BC patients (59%) and in 5 of the 14 NSCLC patients (36%).Conclusions DTX and CPT-11 can be safely given together biweekly at adequate doses, with filgrastim support. In view of the promising activity data in both groups, phase II studies testing this combination in pretreated BC and NSCLC patients are ongoing.This work is presented on behalf of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG), c/o National Tumor Institute of Naples, Italy.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide in previously untreated non-small-cell and extensive small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: This phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide was performedto determine the safety of the combination in patients with advanced lungcancer who had received no prior chemotherapy, and to identify a dose forphase II testing.Patients and methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastaticnon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC),who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with intravenouspaclitaxel given as a three hour infusion (starting dose 100mg/m²) and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily for five days. Twoschedules of administration were used with the paclitaxel given on day 1(schedule A) or day 5 (schedule B) of a 21 day cycle.Results: Forty-nine patients were entered on the study, four of whom hadSCLC. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose waspaclitaxel 200 mg/m² on day 1, in combination with oraletoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 (schedule A). The dose limitingtoxicities were mucositis, myalgia, diarrhoea, and paraesthesiae. Usingschedule B, myelosuppression, with febrile neutropenia was dose limiting ata paclitaxel dose of 160 mg/m². Amongst the 45 patients withNSCLC there were three complete and eight partial responses (24%;95% CI 13%–40%), while there was one completeresponse in the four patients with SCLC.Conclusion: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m² on day 1, with oraletoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 can be administered safely, and is therecommended dose for phase II studies.     

GP方案与NP方案治疗非小细胞肺癌疗效及药物经济学评价

  目的 比较吉西他滨加顺铂（GP方案）与长春瑞滨加顺铂（NP方案）两种联合方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的疗效、毒副反应及药物经济学评价。方法 用GP方案治疗晚期NSCLC 39例（GP组）与NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC 37例（NP组），统计分析临床资料。结果 GP组有效率48.7 %，NP组有效率45.9 %，两组疗效差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），毒副反应主要为恶心呕吐、骨髓抑制。NP组的静脉炎较GP组多发，GP组血小板减少及皮疹发生率高于NP组，GP组的疾病进展时间较NP组延长（P＜0.05）。2疗程平均药物费用GP组￥（23 664±384.7）元，NP组￥（8519.94±369.1）元，有效率与所需费用之比GP组￥（485.02±34.65）元，NP组￥（185.62±23.77）元，中位生存期与所需费用之比GP组￥（2211.59±59.15）元，NP组￥（946.66±43.3）元，1年生存率与所需费用之比GP组￥（608.33±14.35）元，NP组￥（243.43±21.57）元。药物费用NP组明显低于GP组，费用疗效比NP组优于GP组（P＜0.05）。结论 两种方案均为治疗晚期NSCLC的一线方案，在治疗晚期NSCLC时可选用。     

Paclitaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer during pregnancy

The concomitant occurrence of cancer during pregnancy is a rare event. The cancers most frequently detected during pregnancy are breast, cervical, melanoma, ovarian, leukaemia and lymphoma, however the diagnosis of lung cancer during pregnancy is particularly exceptional. In this case, we report on a pregnant woman who was diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer and received therapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin.     

Docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter phase II trial

Purpose: To investigate the activity of docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (G-CSF) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with cisplatin. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients with locoregional and metastatic NSCLC who had relapsed or progressed after first-line treatment with cisplatin-based regimens were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel at 100 mg/m² was given as a 1-h infusion with G-CSF (rhG-CSF given s.c. at 150 μg/m²) support from day 2 to day 8 every 3 weeks; all patients received premedication with corticosteroids. Results: In all, 1 (1.6%) and 14 (23.3%) patients achieved a complete response (CR) and a partial response (PR), respectively, for an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 14.0–35.9%); stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were documented in 18 (30%) and 27 (45%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 20 weeks and the median time to tumor progression was 28 weeks. The median overall survival was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. A total of 263 courses were given at a median of 3 cycles/patient. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (18%) and 14 (23%) patients, respectively, with 18 (30%) patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever; 1 patient died of sepsis. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (15%) and grade 3 asthenia, in 4 (7%). Other toxicities were mild. Conclusions: Docetaxel has considerable single-agent activity in patients with NSCLC who have relapsed or progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-based regimens. Received: 17 June 1998 / Accepted: 17 August 1998     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin, ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin combined with a fixed schedule of ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support; and (2) to determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients entered on this study. Methods: Ifosfamide (1.5 g/m²) and irinotecan (60 mg/m²) were administered at fixed doses on days 1–4 and on days 1, 8 and 15, respectively. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at 60 mg/m² and was increased in 10-mg/m² increments. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. rhG-CSF (nartograstim) was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 1 μg/kg on days 5–18 except on the day of irinotecan treatment. Results: Between June 1995 and April 1998, 46 patients were registered onto this phase I/II study. The MTD of cisplatin was defined according to toxicity and the dose during three courses was increased. Since at the 80 mg/m² dose level more than one-third of the patients were treated with dose modification, the dose of 70 mg/m² was recommended for phase II study. The dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia. The overall response rate was 62.2% (95% CI 48.0–76.4%), the median response duration was 144 days, and the median survival time was 393 days. Conclusion: For phase II study, we recommend doses of cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1 combined with ifosfamide and irinotecan with rhG-CSF support. Both the response rate and preliminary survival data in this study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated NSCLC. Received: 29 April 1999 / Accepted: 15 September 1999