Next-day residual effects of hypnotics in DSM-IV primary insomnia: a driving simulator study with simultaneous electroencephalogram monitoring

Rationale Most studies that investigated the next-day residual effects of hypnotic drugs on daytime driving performances were performed on healthy subjects and after a single drug administration. Objectives In the present study, we further examine whether the results of these studies could be generalised to insomniac patients and after repeated drug administration. Method Single and repeated (7 day) doses of zolpidem (10 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg), lormetazepam (1 mg) or placebo were administered at bedtime in a crossover design to 23 patients (9 men and 14 women aged 38.8±2.0 years) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) primary insomnia. Driving tests were performed 9–11 h post-dose. Results Results showed that treatment effects were evidenced for subjective sleep, for driving abilities, and for electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded before (resting EEG) and during the driving simulation test (driving EEG). Compared to placebo, zopiclone increased the number of collisions and lormetazepam increased deviation from speed limit and deviation from absolute speed, whereas zolpidem did not differentiate from placebo on these analyses. EEG recordings showed that in contrast to zolpidem, lormetazepam and zopiclone induced typical benzodiazepine-like alterations, suggesting that next-day poor driving performance could relate to a prolonged central nervous system effect of these two hypnotics. Conclusion The present results corroborate studies on healthy volunteers showing that residual effects of hypnotics increase with their half-lives. The results further suggest that drugs preserving physiological EEG rhythms before and during the driving simulation test 9–11 h post-dose, such as zolpidem, do not influence next-day driving abilities.     

Assessment of a new hypnotic imidazo-pyridine (zolpidem) as oral premedication.

1 A new imidazo-pyridine hypnotic (zolpidem 10 mg and 20 mg) was compared with placebo as premedication before general anaesthesia in female patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery. Efficacy and tolerance before and after anaesthesia were assessed. Psychomotor testing was used to study recovery from anaesthesia. 2 Both doses of zolpidem produced good sedation pre-operatively but only the higher dose was associated with anterograde amnesia. 3 Premorbid anxiety scores were low in the group of patients studied and were unaffected by either dose of zolpidem. 4 There were no significant effects on the course of anaesthesia. However, postoperatively there was a tendency for wake-up to be delayed in those patients who received either dose of zolpidem. 5 Postoperative recovery, as indicated by tests of psychomotor performance, was noticeably delayed with a dose of 20 mg compared with placebo whilst psychomotor performance had returned towards baseline levels 3 h after wake-up in those patients who had received placebo. The zolpidem 10 mg group was intermediate. 6 Zolpidem may be a suitable premedicant when hypnosis and amnesia only are required.     

Double-blind,placebo-controlled comparison of zolpidem,triazolam, and temazepam in elderly patients with insomnia

Sleep disturbances and need for hypnotics are disproportionately greater in the elderly compared to younger adults. The present study provides a placebo-controlled subjective hypnotic efficacy of zolpidem, triazolam, and temazepam in elderly insomniacs. After a single-blind placebo screening week (DSM-III-R criteria), 335 elderly insomniacs (ages 60 to 85) were randomized to 28 days of double-blind treatment with zolpidem 5 mg, triazolam 0.125 mg, temazepam 15 mg, or placebo, followed by a 4-day single-blind, placebo withdrawal period. The primary efficacy parameters were self-reported sleep latency (SSL) and self-reported total sleep duration (SSD); they were measured by responses on daily Morning Questionnaires. SSL values were compared by Cox proportional hazards regression technique. SSD values were compared by ANOVA. Compared to placebo, zolpidem and temazepam produced significantly shorter SSL over the 4 treatment weeks, but triazolam did not. In the zolpidem group, SSL was significantly shorter than in the placebo group at all four treatment weeks; in the temazepam group, SSL was significantly shorter than in the placebo group at weeks 1, 3, and 4. SSD was increased above baseline levels in all groups. No tolerance to the subjective effects or rebound above baseline levels occurred in any of the treatment groups. Overall, the drugs were well tolerated. No difference was found among the placebo and treatment groups in overall adverse event incidence rates. However, compared with zolpidem and placebo, temazepam produced significantly higher incidences of drowsiness and fatigue, and triazolam produced a significantly higher incidence of nervousness than zolpidem. Drug Dev. Res. 40:230–238, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Acute behavioral effects and abuse potential of trazodone, zolpidem and triazolam in humans

The present study examined the acute behavioral effects and abuse potential of three drugs commonly used to treat sleep disorders, trazodone, zolpidem and triazolam, and placebo in ten male volunteers with histories of alcohol and drug abuse. Trazodone (100, 200 and 300 mg), a triazolopyridine antidepressant, was included because antidepressants are being used more frequently to treat sleep disorders, but it is unclear whether they have a distinct behavioral pharmacologic profile relative to benzodiazepine hypnotics. Zolpidem (15, 30 and 45 mg), an imidazopyridine hypnotic, was tested because it is the most commonly prescribed hypnotic and purportedly has a unique benzodiazepine-receptor binding profile. Triazolam (0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 mg), a triazolobenzodiazepine hypnotic, was included as the standard component because previous laboratory studies have demonstrated that it has at least some abuse potential. Trazodone, zolpidem and triazolam generally produced comparable dose-related increases in scores on the PCAG scale of the ARCI, which suggests the doses tested were equivalent on some behavioral dimension. The effects of trazodone on subject-rated items thought to measure abuse potential (e.g., subject ratings of Willing to Take Again) were less than those observed with triazolam. Zolpidem and triazolam produced comparable effects on these measures. The highest dose of zolpidem, but not triazolam, increased ratings of Like Drug, Happy, Good Effects, Friendly, Elated, Carefree and Bad Effects. Triazolam and zolpidem produced dose-dependent impairment on all of the performance tasks. Trazodone impaired performance on some, but not all, of these tasks. Consistent with the pharmacokinetics of these compounds, the time-action functions of trazodone, zolpidem and triazolam were similar on these measures. These data suggest that trazodone has less abuse potential than triazolam, and may be a viable alternative to benzodiazepine hypnotics in individuals with histories of alcohol or drug abuse. By contrast, despite its unique neuropharmacological profile, the acute behavioral effects and abuse potential of zolpidem are comparable to those of triazolam. Received: 20 June 1998 / Final version: 4 November 1998     

The effects of benzodiazepine (triazolam), cyclopyrrolone (zopiclone) and imidazopyridine (zolpidem) hypnotics on the frequency of hippocampal theta activity and sleep structure in rats.

In order to investigate the relative efficacy and safety of zopiclone and zolpidem, we compared the effects of higher doses of zopiclone and zolpidem on the frequency of hippocampal theta activity and sleep structure with that of triazolam. Rats were divided into triazolam treatment group (1 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg), zopiclone treatment group (20 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg) and zolpidem treatment group (20 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg). Rats were injected intraperitoneally with these drugs or their vehicle. Polygraphic sleep recording and visual frequency analysis of the hippocampal EEG activity in REM sleep were carried out for 6 h after each injection. Zolpidem, unlike triazolam and zopiclone, had a much milder reducing-effect on the frequency of hippocampal theta activity and suppressing-effect on REM sleep. These results suggest that zolpidem may prove to be a safer hypnotic drug which has fewer or milder side effects than are benzodiazepine and cyclopyrrolone hypnotics.     

A comparison of the residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem following administration 5 to 2 h before awakening

AIMS: To compare the duration of the residual hypnotic and sedative effects of zaleplon with those of zolpidem and placebo following nocturnal administration at various times before morning awakening. METHODS: Zaleplon 10 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, or placebo was administered double-blind to 36 healthy subjects under standardized conditions in a six-period, incomplete-block, crossover study. Subjects were gently awakened and given medication at predetermined times 5, 4, 3, or 2 h before morning awakening, which occurred 8 h after bedtime. When the subjects awoke in the morning, a battery of subjective and objective assessments of residual effects of hypnotics was administered. RESULTS: No residual effects were demonstrated after zaleplon 10 mg, when administered as little as 2 h before waking, on either subjective or objective assessments, whereas zolpidem 10 mg showed significant residual effects on DSST and memory (immediate and delayed free recall) after administration up to 5 h before waking and choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold and Sternberg memory scanning after administration up to 4 h before waking. Residual effects of zolpidem were apparent in all objective and subjective measurements when the drug was administered later in the night. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrate that zaleplon at the dose of 10 mg is free of residual hypnotic or sedative effects when administered nocturnally as little as 2 h before waking in normal subjects. In contrast, residual effects of zolpidem are still apparent on objective assessments up to 5 h after nocturnal administration, longer than has been reported from studies involving daytime administration.     

Subjective hypnotic efficacy of trazodone and zolpidem in DSMIII–R primary insomnia

Trazodone is an antidepressant which is used at low doses as a hypnotic. The hypnotic efficacy of trazodone in non-depressed insomniacs is unknown, especially in comparison to hypnotic medications such as zolpidem. Following a placebo screening week, DSM-IIIR defined primary insomniacs were randomized into a parallel-group, double-blind, 14-day comparison of trazodone 50 mg, zolpidem 10 mg and placebo. Patients completed daily morning questionnaires and weekly office visits. Self-reported sleep latencies were compared by the Cox proportional hazards regression technique; self-reported sleep duration by ANOVA. During treatment Week 1, both drugs produced significantly shorter self-reported sleep latencies and longer self-reported sleep durations than placebo. Self-reported sleep latency was significantly shorter with zolpidem than with trazodone. During Week 2, only the zolpidem group maintained a significantly shorter sleep latency than the placebo group, and self-reported sleep duration did not vary significantly among groups. The incidence of adverse events was low in all groups. Both trazodone and zolpidem improved self-reported sleep latency and duration of non-depressed, primary insomniacs; zolpidem was somewhat more efficacious at the doses studied. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effects of zopiclone and temazepam on sleep,behaviour and mood during the day

Summary Over a 3 week period the hypnotic effect of zopiclone 7.5 mg, temazepam 20 mg and placebo was investigated in a double-blind, cross-over study in 60 out-patients.The hypnotic effect, subdivided in the parameters sleep quality, latency of sleep onset and status after awaking, was scored daily by the patient after arising. The results showed that zopiclone 7.5 mg and temazepam 20 mg were almost equally effective. In sleep quality and latency of sleep onset, there appeared to be a non-significant trend favouring zopiclone. Both hypnotics differ significantly from placebo.Mood and behaviour during the day, as well as somatic symptoms and side-effects, were also scored daily and showed no significant differences between the treatments.The third week, which was a placebo week for all patients, showed a gradual improvement in sleep quality. It supports the case for not prescribing hypnotics for more than 2 weeks.     

Sedative,memory, and performance effects of hypnotics

The sedative, amnestic, and performance disruptive effects of benzodiazepine (Bz) receptor selective and non-selective hypnotics were studied in 23 healthy, normal subjects, aged 26.8±1.0 years. Triazolam (0.25 and 0.50 mg), zolpidem (10 and 20 mg) and placebo were administered, double-blind, at bedtime in a repeated measures design. During an awakening 90 min later (at approximate peak concentration of each drug) a 30-min performance battery which included memory, vigilance, and psychomotor tasks was completed. Each drug and dose impaired memory (both immediate and delayed), vigilance, and psychomotor performance relative to placebo. Among active drugs impairment was greatest with zolpidem 20 mg, next triazolam 0.50 mg, then zolpidem 10 mg, and finally triazolam 0.25 mg. Next morning delayed recall was also impaired by all drugs and doses (i.e. anterograde amnesia). The amnestic and performance-disruptive effects paralleled the relative hypnotic effects of the drugs and doses. No receptor selectivity in these pharmacodynamic effects was observed.     

Zolpidem: an update of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of insomnia

Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine agent that is indicated for the short term (< or = 4 weeks) treatment of insomnia (recommended dosage 10 mg/day in adults and 5 or 10 mg/day in the elderly or patients with hepatic impairment). Data have shown that the hypnotic efficacy of zolpidem is generally comparable to that of the benzodiazepines flunitrazepam, flurazepam, nitrazepam, temazepam and triazolam as well as nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agents such as zopiclone and trazodone in the treatment of elderly and adult patients with insomnia. The comparative efficacy of a recently available nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic zaleplon and zolpidem has yet to be established. There was no evidence of tolerance developing to the hypnotic effects of zolpidem in a number of studies of up to 6 months' duration. However, tolerance has been described in a few patients taking the drug at high dosages for periods of up to several years. Zolpidem is well tolerated in patients with insomnia and the most common adverse events are generally nausea, dizziness and drowsiness. Although zolpidem produced some psychomotor and memory impairment over the first few hours after administration, it had few next-day effects (including effects on daytime well-being and morning coordination). In this respect, it was comparable or superior to flunitrazepam and flurazepam and comparable to other benzodiazepines in patients with insomnia. Zolpidem appears to have a low potential for abuse. Conclusions: Zolpidem is effective and well tolerated in patients with insomnia, including the elderly. Studies have shown that zolpidem generally has similar efficacy to other hypnotics including benzodiazepines and zopiclone. Zolpidem appears to have minimal next-day effects on cognition and psychomotor performance when administered at bedtime. In addition, there is little evidence of tolerance to the hypnotic effects of zolpidem, or rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms after discontinuation of the drug when it is given as recommended (10 mg/day for < 1 month) or over longer periods.     

Twelve months of nightly zolpidem does not lead to rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms: a prospective placebo-controlled study

Rebound insomnia, worsened sleep when discontinuing use of a hypnotic, is reported in some short-term studies. No study has prospectively assessed, using patient reports or nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG), the likelihood of rebound insomnia with chronic hypnotic use. The objectives of this study was to assess in primary insomniacs the likelihood of experiencing rebound insomnia and a withdrawal syndrome on repeated placebo substitutions over 12 months of nightly zolpidem use. A group of 33 primary insomniacs, without psychiatric disorders or drug and alcohol abuse, 32-65 years old, 15 men and 18 women, were randomized to take zolpidem 10 mg (n = 17) or placebo (n = 16) nightly for 12 months. In probes during months 1, 4, and 12, placebo was substituted for 7 consecutive nights in both the zolpidem and placebo groups. NPSGs were collected and Tyrer Bezodiazepine Withdrawal Symptom Questionnaires were completed on the first two discontinuation nights. Rebound insomnia was not observed on the first two and the seventh discontinuation nights and its likelihood did not increase over the 12 months of nightly zolpidem use. Some individuals did show rebound insomnia, approximately 30-40% of participants, but the percentage of 'rebounders' did not differ between the placebo and zolpidem groups and did not increase across 12 months. No clinically significant withdrawal symptoms on the Tyrer were observed on the discontinuation nights over the 12 months of nightly use. Chronic nightly hypnotic use at therapeutic doses by primary insomniacs does not lead to rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms.     

Zolpidem extended-release

Zolpidem extended-release, or controlled-release (CR), is a new formulation of zolpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic. It is indicated in the US for the treatment of insomnia, characterised by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance. Zolpidem CR is a dual-layered tablet; one layer releases zolpidem immediately and a second layer provides a slower release of additional zolpidem for maintenance of plasma zolpidem concentrations. Efficacy of zolpidem CR was assessed in two 3-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III polysomnography trials in younger adult (aged 18-64 years) or elderly (aged > or =65 years) patients with primary insomnia. Patients received nightly zolpidem CR (12.5mg in younger adult and 6.25mg in elderly patients). Efficacy was assessed objectively on nights 1, 2, 15 and 16. Patients who received zolpidem CR had significantly improved objective latency to persistent sleep, wake time after sleep onset and sleep efficiency on assessment nights compared with placebo recipients. In subjective assessments of sleep quality on day 2 and nights 15 and 22, significantly more zolpidem CR than placebo recipients gave favourable responses on a Patient Global Impression scale in the study in younger adult patients. In the other study, significantly more elderly patients in the zolpidem CR group rated their sleep as improved compared with the placebo group. Zolpidem CR was generally well tolerated and appears to have a tolerability profile similar to that of the original formulation of zolpidem.     

Different effects of L-type and T-type calcium channel blockers on the hypnotic potency of triazolam and zolpidem in rats.

We examined the effects of an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, nilvadipine (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg), and that of a T-type Ca2+ channel blocker, flunarizine (10.0 and 40.0 mg/kg), on the hypnotic potency of both a benzodiazepine (BZ)-hypnotic, triazolam (1.0 mg/kg), and a non-BZ hypnotic, zolpidem (20.0 mg/kg), in rats. The polysomnogram was recorded for 6 h after administration of the vehicle solution alone, or after one of the Ca2+ channel blockers, with or without one of the hypnotics. Both Ca2+ channel blockers prolonged the increased total time of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep induced by either hypnotic. In the case of triazolam, however, the non-REM sleep-enhancing effect induced by nilvadipine was greater than that induced by flunarizine. These findings indicate that the hypnotic action of triazolam is potentiated more strongly by an L-type Ca2+ channel blocker than by a T-type Ca2+ channel blocker.     

Zaleplon: a review of its use in the treatment of insomnia

Zaleplon is a pyrazolopyrimidine hypnotic agent which is indicated for the short term (2 to 4 weeks) management of insomnia. Zaleplon 5 and 10 mg at bedtime (usual recommended doses) significantly reduced sleep latency compared with placebo in clinical trials in nonelderly and elderly patients with insomnia. In general, sleep maintenance (sleep duration and number of awakenings) and sleep quality were not significantly different from placebo with zaleplon 5 and 10 mg/night. Zaleplon 20 mg/night significantly improved sleep latency and duration in nonelderly patients, but effects on number of awakenings were inconsistent and sleep quality generally did not improve. The relative hypnotic efficacy of zaleplon compared with that of triazolam and zolpidem is not yet clearly established. Tolerance to the hypnotic effects of zaleplon generally did not occur during 5 weeks' treatment, or during long term treatment (6 or 12 months) according to a small number of studies presented as abstracts. Zaleplon was well tolerated in clinical trials. The most common event was headache but the incidence was similar to that observed with placebo. Zaleplon 5 and 10 mg did not impair psychomotor function or memory even immediately after the dose in studies in volunteers or patients with insomnia. Zaleplon 20 mg, however, impaired psychomotor function and memory immediately after the dose but next-day effects were not observed. The psychomotor profile of zaleplon appears to be better than that of comparator agents. Rebound insomnia was not observed after sudden discontinuation of up to 12 months' treatment with zaleplon 5 and 10 mg/night and up to 4 weeks' treatment with zaleplon 20 mg/night. In addition, the potential for withdrawal syndrome with zaleplon appears to be low according to limited data. In conclusion, zaleplon 5, 10 and 20 mg administered at bedtime, or later if patients have difficulty sleeping, is an effective and well tolerated hypnotic agent. There was no evidence of next-day residual effects with the 5 and 10 mg dosages, and the incidence of withdrawal effects with zaleplon 5, 10 and 20 mg did not differ significantly to that observed with placebo. In addition, tolerance to the effects of zaleplon is unlikely to develop when administered for the recommended treatment period. The comparative efficacy and tolerability of zaleplon with other short acting nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics is difficult to establish. However, on the basis of current efficacy evidence and the lower incidence of residual effects with zaleplon 5 and 10 mg relative to comparator agents, this drug represents a useful option in the management of patients with insomnia who have difficulties initiating sleep.     

Residual effects of hypnotics: epidemiology and clinical implications

The risk of "hangover" effects, e.g. residual daytime sleepiness and impairment of psychomotor and cognitive functioning the day after bedtime administration, is one of the main problems associated with the use of hypnotics. However, the severity and duration of these effects varies considerably between hypnotics and is strongly dependent on the dose administered. This article reviews epidemiological evidence on the effect of hypnotics on patients' risk for accidents such as traffic accidents, falls and hip fractures (i.e. end-points for residual effects). Information on the duration and severity of residual effects of 11 hypnotics (flunitrazepam, flurazepam, loprazolam, lormetazepam, midazolam, nitrazepam, temazepam, triazolam, zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone) was derived from expert ratings, a meta-analysis and actual driving studies. Epidemiological studies show that the risks of an accident increase with increasing half-life of the hypnotic, but that the use of hypnotics with a short half-life, such as triazolam, zopiclone and zolpidem, can also be associated with increased risks. A summary of results from experimental studies should enable prescribing clinicians to compare residual effects of the various hypnotics at different doses and select the one considered most favourable in this respect for the individual patient. This information should also enable them to inform patients more adequately about the likelihood and duration of residual effects of a specific hypnotic dose.     

The dose effects of zolpidem on the sleep of healthy normals

This study determined the dose effects of zolpidem in 12 healthy males with normal sleep patterns. Subjects spent 7 weeks, 3 consecutive nights per week, in the laboratory and had a 4-night washout between treatments. The first week was a screening and adaptation week. Then subjects received zolpidem (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, or 20.0 mg) or placebo on the first two nights for each of the next 6 consecutive weeks. Treatments were organized in a Latin square design and administered in a double-blind fashion. On the third night of each treatment, subjects always received placebo. The 5.0 mg and larger doses of zolpidem significantly decreased latency to persistent sleep and wake before sleep. Sleep maintenance measures were not affected by zolpidem. The 7.5 mg and higher doses of zolpidem significantly increased total sleep time. The only significant sleep stage effect was a decrease in percent of rapid eye movement sleep at only the 20 mg dose. No consistent discontinuation effects were found. Zolpidem was hypnotically active at doses as low as 5.0 and 7.5 mg, and sleep stage effects occurred only at the 20 mg dose, thus separating the dose range of hypnotic and sleep stage effects.     

Zolpidem-polysomnographic study of the effect of a new hypnotic drug in sleep apnea syndrome

Clinical studies have shown that zolpidem, an original imidazopyridine derivative, induces and maintains sleep and does not have daytime side-effects. Polysomnography has revealed that this drug has several interesting qualities that benzodiazepines do not possess: stages 3-4 increase, stage 2 is unchanged or slightly reduced and no abnormal changes are detected on the EEG tracing. Like benzodiazepines, zolpidem slightly reduces REM sleep. The Multiple Sleep Latency Test confirmed that the drug does not cause daytime drowsiness. All the hypnotic drugs studied up to now worsen heavy snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A controlled double blind cross-over trial assessed the effects of a single dose of zolpidem 20 mg on nocturnal breathing in patients with mild forms of sleep apnea syndrome. The results indicate that, at this dose, the drug does not overcome the existing contraindications to the use of hypnotics in this syndrome.     

Effect of zopiclone and midazolam on sleep and EEG spectra in a phase-advanced sleep schedule

Midazolam (15 mg), a benzodiazepine (BDZ) hypnotic, and zopiclone (7.5 mg), a non-BDZ hypnotic, were administered to young, healthy subjects prior to bedtime. They went to bed at 2300 hours after taking placebo (PL-23), and then on three occasions at 1900 hour after taking placebo (PL-19) or one of the hypnotics. Advancing bedtime by 4 hour increased the combined value of waking, stage 1, and movement time. Compared to PL-19, both drugs reduced sleep latency and stage 3, and increased stage 2. Spectral analysis of the EEG in non-rapid-eye-movement sleep revealed a declining trend of power density in the low-frequency range in the course of the night. Activity in the 1 to 10 Hz range was markedly depressed by the two hypnotics, whereas activity in the spindle range (11 to 14 Hz) was augmented. The former changes persisted throughout the 12-hour recording period. The fact that both hypnotics bind to BDZ receptors could be responsible for the similar effects on the EEG spectra.     

Effects on postural oscillation and memory functions of a single dose of zolpidem 5 mg,zopiclone 3.75 mg and lormetazepam 1 mg in elderly healthy subjects. A randomized,cross-over,double-blind study versus placebo

OBJECTIVE: In elderly patients, both falls and impaired memory are considerable medical problems. Hypnotics, which are frequently administered to this patient group for the treatment of insomnia, should ideally not impair equilibrium or memory functions. This double-blind, randomised, four-way, cross-over study investigated the effects of frequently prescribed hypnotics from different classes on postural oscillation and memory under real life conditions. Zolpidem 5 mg, zopiclone 3.75 mg, lormetazepam 1 mg (i.e. usual starting doses in elderly) or placebo were administered at night to 48 healthy elderly volunteers aged 65 years or more. The study included four treatment periods separated by wash-out periods of at least 1 week. METHODS: Psychomotor tests up to 9 h or 10 h after drug intake included, for attention and body sway, clinical stabilometric platform (CSP) tests, simple reaction time (SRT), and the critical tracking test (CTT); for memory, the learning memory tasks (LMT) and the Sternberg memory scanning test (mean reaction time [MRT] and percentage of correct answers) were used. For subjective sleep evaluation the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) and for sedation a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used. For safety evaluations, adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: The results demonstrate that compared with placebo, the active drugs increased body sway (area eyes open and closed in the CSP); however, this effect disappeared after 5 h with zolpidem, while it disappeared only after 8 h with lormetazepam and zopiclone. All three drugs did not affect attention assessed by the SRT and CTT. Concerning memory, Sternberg MRT at 9 h was not significantly different up to 5 digits for all groups in comparison with placebo, while for 6 digits it was significantly increased with lormetazepam and zopiclone. In the LMT, an impairment of performance was observed with lormetazepam relative to both zolpidem and placebo. CONCLUSION: The safest compared drug with regard to body sway was zolpidem, because of its short-lasting effect. In addition, zolpidem did not show any significant effect on memory functions, in the present dose comparison.