Evaluation of serum clusterin as a surveillance tool for human hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common human cancer worldwide. The levels of serum clusterin in HCC patients and its potential diagnostic significance is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical use of serum clusterin levels as a surveillance tool for HCC with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related cirrhosis. Methods: Twenty‐two cases of healthy subjects, 31 cases of HBV carriers, 26 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 29 patients with cirrhosis, and 76 patients with HCC were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of clusterin were measured by a sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The serum clusterin levels in HCC patients were significantly lower than that in healthy, HBV carriers and chronic hepatitis B, but statistically higher than in cirrhosis patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that a serum clusterin value of 50 µg/mL yielded the best sensitivity (91%) and specificity (83%) for differentiating HCC patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis from those with HBV‐related cirrhosis. The optimal alpha fetoprotein (AFP) cutoff value was 15 ng/mL and was inferior to the clusterin value of 50 µg/mL, the area under the ROC curves being 0.937 versus 0.781, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Serum clusterin was more sensitive and specific than serum AFP for differentiating HCC patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis from those with HBV‐related liver cirrhosis, and may be a useful surveillance tool of HCC based on HBV‐related cirrhosis.     

Usefulness of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in hepatitis C virus related cirrhosis: analysis of the factors influencing AFP elevation without HCC development]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is frequently used for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most available data concerning AFP came from studies of patients with chronic hepatitis B or mixed etiologies. Studies concerning the diagnostic value of AFP for HCV-related liver cirrhosis (LC) are limited. We evaluated the factors influencing AFP elevation in the absence of HCC and analyzed the diagnostic value of serum AFP in HCC surveillance of HCV-related LC patients. METHODS: We enrolled 55 patients of HCV-related LC with HCC and 62 patients without HCC as a case-control study were analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated and the clinical and biochemical factors influencing serum AFP levels. RESULTS: The sensitivities and specificities of serum AFP for the detection of HCC in HCV-related LC were 72.7% and 59.7% for AFP>or=20 ng/mL, and 47.3% and 92.5% for AFP>or=100 ng/mL, respectively. Elevated serum AST was independently associated with elevated serum AFP level in HCV-related LC. In cases of ASTor=100 ng/mL for the diagnosis of HCC was 100%. However, in case of AST>2 ULN, the specificity was 85.0% for AFP>or=100 ng/mL and 95.0% for AFP>or=200 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Serum AST levels influence serum AFP level in HCV-related LC. In cases of AST2 ULN.     

Serum insulin-like growth factor-II as a serologic marker of small hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is not a useful tumor marker for diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is over-expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II in HCC tissue. This study investigates the diagnostic application of IGF-II in small HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum levels of IGF-II and AFP were determined in 41 patients with small cirrhotic HCC (< or = 3 cm), 41 sex- and age-matched patients with cirrhosis alone (LC), and 41 healthy adults. The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing HCC were determined with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Both IGF-II and AFP levels in HCC were higher than those in LC patients or controls (each p = 0.0001). The IGF-II levels in LC patients were lower than those in controls (p = 0.001). In HCC patients, multivariate analysis indicated that that both IGF-II (odds ratio, 4.54; 95% confidence interval, 2.15-9.55; p = 0.0001) and AFP (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08; p = 0.003) were found to be associated with an increased risk of presence of HCC. The optimal cut-off values of IGF-II (4.1 mg/g prealbumin) and AFP (50 ng/ml) were determined with ROC curves. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values for IGF-II were 63%, 90%, and 70%, respectively. Those for AFP were 44%, 95%, and 70%, respectively. Determination of both markers in parallel significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy (88%) and sensitivity (80%), with a high specificity (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Serum IGF-II level can be used as an independent serologic marker or a complementary tumor marker to AFP for diagnosis of small HCC.     

Racial differences in effectiveness of alpha-fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) is frequently used as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Most available data concerning AFP come from studies of patients with chronic hepatitis B or other chronic liver diseases of mixed etiologies. Limited data concerning the diagnostic value of AFP for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC have to date come only from Asian and European studies, and results are conflicting. There may be significant differences in AFP levels depending on racial backgrounds and etiologies of primary liver disease. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of 163 HCC patients with HCV infection and 149 control patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. The positive likelihood ratios for AFP at 0 to 20, 21 to 50, 51 to 100, and 101 to 200 ng/mL were 0.46, 1.31, 1.15, and 6.90, respectively. No controls had AFP greater than 200 ng/mL. The sensitivity of AFP for the diagnosis of HCC in African Americans with HCV infection was lower than that of patients of all other ethnic groups combined (57.1% vs. 81.6% for AFP > 10 ng/mL, P =.02, and 42.9% vs. 66.0% for AFP > 20 ng/mL, P =.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.81 for non-African Americans but only 0.56 for African Americans. In conclusion, AFP greater than 200 ng/mL can be used to confirm HCC in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and a hepatic mass. However, AFP is insensitive for the diagnosis of HCC in African Americans.     

Angiopoietin-2 serum levels are elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: Liver cirrhosis is characterized by remodeling leading to nodules that are difficult to discern from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serum levels are used for the screening for HCC, with limited success. We evaluated angiopoietin-2 as a serum marker in patients with cirrhosis and with HCC. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we measured angiopoietin-2 serum levels in 131 patients with HCC, 180 patients with cirrhosis, and 40 healthy controls. We also determined AFP serum levels in patients with HCC and compared the test characteristics of both serum markers. The expression patterns of angiopoietin-2 were determined by in situ hybridization in healthy and cirrhotic livers as well as in HCC. RESULTS: Angiopoietin-2 serum levels were elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis (P < 0.0001) compared with healthy controls. Levels were further elevated in patients with HCC compared with healthy controls (P < 0.0001) and cirrhotic patients (P < 0.0001). The combination with AFP measurements led to improved discrimination between HCC and cirrhosis. Angiopoietin-2 message was present in tumor cells of HCCs but was absent from hepatocytes of cirrhotic and healthy livers. In cirrhosis, message was detected within the strands of fibrous tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Serum angiopoietin-2 levels are elevated in patients with cirrhosis, implicating a possible role of the angiopoietin-Tie-2 system for neoangiogenesis in cirrhosis. Serum levels are further elevated in patients with HCC, suggesting the potential use of angiopoietin-2 as a marker for the detection of cirrhosis and HCC.     

Utility of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the screening of patients with virus-related chronic liver disease: does different viral etiology influence AFP levels in HCC? A study in 350 western patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dosage of serum AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) is widely used for HCC screening in patients with chronic liver disease. Virus-related chronic liver disease is the main cause of cirrhosis and HCC in Western and Far Eastern countries, but the relationship between viral etiology and AFP levels in HCC is still unclear. The aim of this study was to verify, in Western patients with post-viral chronic liver disease, the usefulness of AFP dosage for the detection of HCC, and the influence of viral etiology on AFP levels in HCC. METHODOLOGY: The study population included 350 patients with post viral chronic liver disease that underwent liver biopsy, serum AFP determination and ultrasound liver evaluation. Seven patients had normal liver histology, 197 had chronic hepatitis, 72 had cirrhosis, and 74 had cirrhosis and HCC. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis was used to assess the best diagnostic AFP threshold value for HCC detection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to individuate independent predictors of HCC diagnosis. RESULTS: No difference was observed in AFP levels between HCV- and HBV-positive patients, neither in the whole population nor in the HCC patients only. ROC area under curve for AFP was 0.801 (95% CI: 0.721-0.867). The analysis individuated a best accurate AFP threshold value for HCC diagnosis of 50 ng/mL. HCC was detected with specificity > or = 95% only for AFP > 100 ng/mL. The sensitivity however was poor (25%). Male sex, age > 60, and AFP were independent predictors of HCC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Serum AFP levels in HCC patients are not influenced by virus B or C hepatitis pattern. AFP dosage should not be used for HCC diagnosis in non-cirrhotic patients. Male patients with cirrhosis should be regarded with a more "aggressive" screening program compared to females.     

Elevation of endoglin (CD105) concentrations in serum of patients with liver cirrhosis and carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Liver cirrhosis is considered as a premalignant state, as about 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with liver cirrhosis. Although alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has a high negative predictive value, its sensitivity for detecting HCC is poor. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating endoglin (CD105) in the serum of patients with liver cirrhosis and at high risk for HCC. METHODS: CD105 and AFP serum concentrations were measured in 70 healthy and 94 nonliver-diseased controls and 130 patients with chronic liver diseases and HCC, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-seven liver cirrhotic patients, 45 patients with liver cirrhosis plus HCC, 19 liver fibrosis patients and nine patients with HCC only were studied. Serum CD105 is significantly elevated in liver cirrhotic patients compared with healthy (P<0.0001) and nonliver-diseased controls (P<0.0001). Patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC show the highest CD105 concentrations being significantly elevated in comparison to liver cirrhosis (P=0.0006) and HCC only (P=0.0134). A stronger positive correlation exists between CD105 and AFP in the patient group suffering from liver cirrhosis and HCC (r=0.479, P=0.0015) than the obtained correlation between both markers in the group of patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis alone (r=0.358, P=0.0073). The logistic regression model identified CD105 as an independent marker (P=0.0077, odds ratio 1.3). CONCLUSION: CD105 has the potential to be a novel complementary biomarker that has some important bearing on the risk assessment for development of HCC in cirrhotic patients.     

Diagnostic value of PIVKA-Ⅱ and alpha-fetoprotein in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To determine the cutoff values and to compare the diagnostic role of alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-Ⅱ(PIVKA-Ⅱ) in chronic hepatitis B(CHB).METHODS: A total of 1255 patients with CHB, including 157 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), 879 with non-cirrhotic CHB and 219 with cirrhosis without HCC, were retrospectively enrolled. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic(AUROC) curves of PIVKA-Ⅱ, AFP and their combination were calculated and compared.RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values for PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were 40 m AU/m L and 10 ng/m L, respectively, for the differentiation of HCC from nonmalignant CHB. The sensitivity and specificity were 73.9% and 89.7%, respectively, for PIVKA-Ⅱ and 67.5% and 90.3% for AFP, respectively. The AUROC curves of both PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were not significantly different(0.854 vs 0.853, P = 0.965) for the differentiation of HCC from nonmalignant CHB, whereas the AUROC of PIVKA-Ⅱ was significantly better than that of AFP in patients with cirrhosis(0.870 vs 0.812, P = 0.042). When PIVKA-Ⅱ and AFP were combined, the diagnostic power improved significantly compared to either AFP or PIVKA-Ⅱ alone for the differentiation of HCC from nonmalignant CHB(P 0.05), especially when cirrhosis was present(P 0.05).CONCLUSION: Serum PIVKA-Ⅱ might be a better tumor marker than AFP, and its combination with AFP may enhance the early detection of HCC in patients with CHB.     

Alpha-L-fucosidase as a serum marker of hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand

To evaluate the role of serum alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we simultaneously studied both AFU activity and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level in 60 patients with HCC, 60 patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis each, 30 patients with other liver tumors and 60 healthy subjects. Serum AFU activity in patients with HCC (1,418.62 +/- 575.76 nmol/ml/hr) was significantly higher than that found in cirrhosis (831.25 +/- 261.13 nmol/ml/hr), chronic hepatitis (717.71 +/- 205.86 nmol/ ml/hr) or other tumors (706.68 +/- 197.67 nmol/ml/hr) and in controls (504.18 +/- 121.88 nmol/ml/hr, p < 0.05). With 870 nmol/ml/hr (mean value of controls plus 3 standard deviations) considered as the cut-off point, AFU was more sensitive (81.7 vs 39.1%) but less specific (70.7 vs 99.3%) than AFP at a level of > 400 ng/ml as a tumor marker of HCC. With both markers combined, the sensitivity was improved to as much as 82.6%. AFU activity in HCC patients was correlated to tumor size (r = 0.3529, p = 0.006) but not associated with tumor staging classified by Okuda's criteria (p = 0.1). The AFU activity in the viral hepatitis group (hepatitis B or C) was also significantly higher than in the non-viral group (p = 0.0005). We conclude AFU to be a useful marker, in conjunction with AFP and ultrasonography, for detecting HCC, particularly in patients with underlying viral hepatitis and cirrhosis.     

原发性肝细胞癌血清中miR-888-5p的表达及临床意义

背景miR-888-5p高表达于原发性肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)组织及HCC细胞系,可促进肿瘤细胞侵袭及转移,与疾病分期及预后不良相关.然而HCC患者血清中miR-888-5p的表达水平尚未被检测,血清miR-888-5p对于HCC诊断及预后判断相关价值尚未被评估.目的检测HCC患者血清中miR-888-5p表达水平,探究其对HCC的诊断价值及与临床特征之间的关系.方法收集68例HCC患者、46例慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(chronic hepatitis B,CHB)患者、43例肝硬化(liver cirrhosis,LC)患者及40例同期健康体检者,实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction,qRT-PCR)法检测血清中miR-888-5p表达量,受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估其诊断HCC的价值,并分析与HCC临床特征之间的关系.结果HCC患者血清中miR-888-5p表达量较CHB、LC及健康者显著上调(P<0.05).ROC曲线提示,联合检测ROC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.907,敏感性91.18%,特异性72.50%)对HCC诊断价值优于分别检测血清miR-888-5p(AUC=0.737,敏感性79.41%,特异性62.50%)及甲胎蛋白(alpha-fetoprotein,AFP)(AUC=0.819,敏感性73.53%,特异性97.50%),且对AFP阴性HCC也具有较高的诊断价值:AUC=0.793,敏感性90.90%,特异性62.50%.此外,miR-888-5p表达水平与HCC肺转移相关(P=0.01).结论血清miR-888-5p对HCC及AFP阴性HCC具有较高诊断价值,与AFP联合检测诊断价值更高.miR-888-5p表达水平与HCC肺转移相关,有望成为HCC早期诊断及评估预后的新型血清学分子标志物.     

Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with advanced hepatitis C: results from the HALT-C Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been useful in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but lacks specificity. We assessed serum AFP among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis to establish predictors of AFP elevations and changes with antiviral therapy. METHODS: Serum AFP was measured at baseline and on therapy in patients in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment against Cirrhosis (HALT-C). AFP levels were correlated with patient demographic and clinical features. RESULTS: Baseline AFP was > or = 20 ng/mL in 191 of 1145 patients (16.6%). Mean AFP values were significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis than in those with bridging fibrosis (22.5 vs. 11.4 ng/mL, P < 0.0001). Factors independently associated with raised serum AFP in patients with cirrhosis were female gender, black race, decreased platelet count, increased serum AST/ALT ratio, serum ferritin, and Mallory bodies in liver biopsies. Serum AFP levels decreased significantly during therapy with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin. HCC was identified in six subjects, only three of whom had AFP > 20 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C, serum AFP values are frequently elevated, even in the absence of HCC. Factors associated with raised AFP include severity of liver disease, female gender and black race. Serum AFP levels decline during antiviral therapy.     

血清高尔基体蛋白73诊断原发性肝癌价值探讨

目的探讨高尔基体蛋白73（GP73）诊断肝癌的价值。方法在肝癌107例、肝硬化53例、肝衰竭患者40例和健康人34例,采用ELISA法检测血清GP73浓度,采用ROC曲线寻找GP73诊断肝癌的最佳截断点,并与AFP进行比较,以评价GP73诊断肝癌的价值。结果原发性肝癌、肝硬化和慢性肝衰竭患者血清GP73水平分别为123.5±22.4ng/ml、108.9±30.3ng/ml和130.3±45.6ng/ml,均显著高于健康对照人群（44.1±38.9ng/ml,P〈0.05）;原发性肝癌、肝硬化和慢性肝衰竭患者血清AFP水平分别为236.6±205.3ng/ml、5.3±5.56ng/ml和53.9±40.40 ng/ml;选择血清GP73最佳截断点为77.4ng/ml,其诊断原发性肝癌的灵敏度为89.6%,特异度为100%,AFP的最佳截断点为35.4ng/ml,其诊断原发性肝癌的灵敏度为64.2%,特异度为100%;原发性肝癌患者血清GP73水平在不同年龄、性别、Edmondson分级和结节数目多寡之间无显著性相差,而在不同肿瘤大小、TNM分期和是否合并肝硬化方面均有显著性差异（P＜0.05）。结论血清GP73诊断肝癌的灵敏度优于AFP,尤其在AFP阴性患者诊断中有一定的意义。     

Diagnostic role of serum glypican-3 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from non-malignant chronic liver disease and other liver cancers

Background and Aims:  The role of glypican-3 (GPC3), a novel serum marker, in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-malignant chronic liver disease and other malignant space-occupying lesions in the liver is largely unknown. The aims of this study were to evaluate its diagnostic role and clinical correlations in patients with HCC.
Methods:  Six groups were studied which included 40 healthy subjects, 50 patients with chronic hepatitis (CH), 50 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), 100 patients with HCC, 50 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and 50 patients with metastatic carcinoma (MCA). Serum GPC3 levels were measured by using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
Results:  Fifty-three percent of HCC patients had elevated serum GPC3 levels with values ranging 35.5–7826.6 ng/mL. The serum marker was undetectable in other groups except one patient (2%) with LC and another patient (2%) with MCA. In most cases of HCC, elevated GPC3 values did not correlate with α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Detectable GPC3 was significantly correlated with the presence of viral hepatitis markers but was not correlated with tumor size and stage of HCC. Serum GPC3 was superior to AFP in detecting small HCC (56.3% and 31.3%, respectively). A combination of serum GPC3 and AFP yielded an improved sensitivity for detecting small HCC to 75%.
Conclusion:  Serum GPC3 is highly specific for detecting HCC. The combined use of serum GPC3 and AFP provides a potentially promising tool to better differentiate HCC from benign liver disorders, as well as from other liver cancers.     

Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, alpha-fetoprotein and AFP-L3 in patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common complication in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Detection of HCC at an early stage is critical for a favorable clinical outcome. The study aim was to: (i) compare the levels of des‐γ‐carboxyprothrombin (DCP), α‐fetoprotein (AFP) and AFP‐L3 in HCC patients and in chronic viral hepatitis patients without HCC; (ii) define the level of each tumor marker with the best sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis; and (iii) to correlate the levels of these markers with respect to size and tumor burden. Methods: Two hundred and forty patients with either hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were studied. These included 144 with HCC, 47 with chronic hepatitis (fibrosis stage I–III on liver biopsy) and 49 with cirrhosis. Results: Levels of DCP, AFP and AFP L‐3 were significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (P ≤ 0.0001). Receiver–operating curves (ROC) indicated that the cut‐off value with the best sensitivity and specificity for each test was ≥84 mAU/mL for DCP, ≥25 ng/mL for AFP and ≥10% for AFP‐L3. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for DCP was 87%, 85% and 86.8%, for AFP 69%, 87% and 69.8%, and for AFP‐L3 56%, 90% and 56.1%, respectively. DCP levels were below the ROC cut‐off in all patients without HCC. In patients with single lesions, there was a direct correlation of DCP to tumor size. High levels of AFP correlated with diffuse type of HCC. All three markers were significantly elevated in the presence of metastatic HCC. No advantage was observed by combining two or three markers for HCC diagnosis. Conclusion: DCP had the highest sensitivity and PPV for HCC diagnosis, had a direct correlation with tumor size, and was not elevated in any patients without HCC. DCP should be used as the main serum test for HCC detection.     

Cutoff values of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma

Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) is a promising serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There are limited data on its cutoff value in HCC for Taiwanese cirrhosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of PIVKA-II levels in patients with suspected HCC. In total, 88 patients with chronic hepatitis and suspected HCC by ultrasound, elevated α-fetoprotein (AFP) or PIVKA-II levels were consecutively enrolled. Their baseline characteristics and findings on dynamic phases of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were examined. Sixty participants had cirrhosis and 34 had HCC. The median levels of PIVKA-II in non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis patients without or with HCC were 28.0, 48.0, and 847.0 mAU/mL, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of PIVKA-II in predicting HCC was 78.0 mAU/mL. Combining AFP with PIVKAII mildly increased its diagnostic performance for HCC, yielding higher specificity and positive predictive value. Significant factors predicting HCC in multivariate regression analysis were PIVKA >78.0 mAU/mL and fatty liver. Monitoring PIVKA-II level is suitable for noninvasively assessing HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis, particularly with AFP.     

A prospective study of blood alpha-fetoprotein messenger RNA as a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis

Summary. Blood alpha-fetoprotein messenger RNA (AFP mRNA) is thought to be a marker of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its value as a predictor of HCC in patients at risk is not known. A series of 201 patients with compensated cirrhosis (114 men, mean age 58 years) underwent surveillance with semi-annual ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements. Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected at different intervals and AFP mRNA was retrotranscribed and amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction. Ten patients with HCC and 30 blood donors were used as controls. Three patients with HCC, 39 with cirrhosis under surveillance and four blood donors circulated AFP mRNA (30, 20 and 13%, NS). During 50 months of surveillance, 27 patients with cirrhosis developed HCC: the tumour was detected more often in patients with higher than normal baseline serum AFP (≥7 IU/L) than in those with normal AFP levels (21% vs 9%, P  = 0.02). The incidence of HCC was the same in patients with and without AFP mRNA at baseline (15% vs 14%). In 53 patients, AFP mRNA was re-tested after 6–25 months of surveillance. HCC developed in two of 11 (18%) who were initially AFP mRNA positive and later became negative, in none of those who were initially negative and later became positive and in two of 39 (5%) who remained persistently negative. In conclusion, blood AFP mRNA is not a sensitive predictor of HCC in patients with compensated cirrhosis.     

Serum midkine is a more sensitive predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma than Dickkopf-1 and alpha-L-fucosidase in cirrhotic HCV patients

Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level is the gold standard diagnostic tool for detection and monitoring hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but with low sensitivity. Thus, the identification of alternative or combined serum markers of HCC is highly needed. Therefore, the aim of this work was to verify the value of serum midkine (MDK), Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), and alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) in detection of HCC.We recruited 244 subjects to the present study; 89 with liver cirrhosis, 86 cirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV) induced HCC, and 69 apparently healthy volunteers as controls. Serum AFP, MDK, DKK1, and AFU were measured by ELISA.Patients with HCC showed significantly higher serum MDK, DKK1, and AFU levels compared with those patients with liver cirrhosis and healthy controls (X² = 179.56, 153.94, and 90.07 respectively) (P < .001 in all). In HCC cases, neither of MDK, DKK1, or AFU was correlated with tumor number. On the other hand, only serum DKK1 was significantly higher in lesions >5 cm, those with portal vein thrombosis and advanced HCC stage. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that serum MDK levels discriminated between cirrhosis and HCC at a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90% at cut-off value of >5.1 ng/mL.Although our results showed that serum MDK, DKK-1, and AFU are increased in HCC cases only MDK may be considered as the most promising serological marker for the prediction of the development of HCC in cirrhotic HCV patients.     

DR-70 immunoassay for the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: Although alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) is a widely used serological marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its utility is limited due to its unsatisfactory sensitivity. Meanwhile, a newly developed immunoassay—DR‐70—has been reported to have a good sensitivity for HCC in a small‐scale study. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical value of DR‐70 for the surveillance of HCC. Methods: Serum levels of DR‐70 and AFP were measured in 103 patients with HCC, 50 healthy volunteers, and 33 patients with chronic liver disease. In addition, we investigated the prognostic value of DR‐70 in patients with HCC correlating with the clinical staging—Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification. Results: Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve of 0.836, the DR‐70 cut‐off value for detecting HCC was determined to be 0.75 µg/mL. DR‐70 provided a sensitivity of 81.6% and a specificity of 77.1%, and correlated well with the CLIP score and BCLC classification. The combination of DR‐70 and AFP increased the sensitivity to 91.2%. The prognosis for patients with HCC with DR‐70 level > 0.75 µg/mL was worse than that for those with DR‐70 ≤ 0.75 µg/mL. Among the patients with early stage HCC (CLIP score 0–2), DR‐70 > 0.75 µg/mL independently predicted a poor survival. Conclusions: DR‐70 immunoassay is complementary to AFP for the detection of HCC and has a good correlation with clinical staging and prognosis.     

Plasma Osteopontin Level in Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Osteopontin (OPN) is a secreted glycoprotein and is frequently associated with various tumors.

Objectives

We sought to investigate the clinical usefulness of the level of plasma OPN, compared to α-fetoprotein (AFP), as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate its diagnostic value in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its relationship with clinical and laboratory features of HCC and NAFLD.

Patients and Methods

The study was performed on 120 subjects classified into 5 groups: Group I included 25 chronic non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients; Group II encompassed 25 patients with chronic HCV infection with liver cirrhosis; Group III comprised 25 patients with chronic HCV with liver cirrhosis and HCC; Group IV was comprised of 25 patients with NAFLD; and Group V consisted of 20 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. All the participants were subjected to history taking and clinical and abdominal ultrasonographic examinations as well as the following laboratory investigations: liver function tests, complete blood count, blood sugar, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibodies, HCV-RNA by qualitative polymerase chain reaction (for Groups I, II, and III) and serum AFP and plasma OPN levels.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in plasma OPN levels between the HCC group (401 ± 72 ng/mL) and the other groups, between the cirrhotic group (258.3 ± 35 ng/mL) and the non-cirrhotic group (HCV group, 168.7 ± 41 ng/mL; fatty liver group, 106.7 ± 35 ng/mL), and between the chronic non-cirrhotic HCV group and the fatty liver group (I and IV) and the controls (35.1 ± 6 ng/mL). In the HCC group, the diagnostic value of OPN was comparable to that of AFP at a cutoff value of 280 ng/mL, achieving sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of 100%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Regarding the validity of plasma OPN as a predictor of fatty change, our results revealed a diagnostic accuracy of 50% with 70% sensitivity, 45% specificity, 50% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value at a cutoff value of 134 ng/mL.

Conclusions

Plasma OPN is comparable to AFP as a diagnostic marker and is related to the severity of liver involvement in HCC patients. Plasma OPN is of diagnostic potential value in NAFLD.     

Serum chromogranin-A in hepatocellular carcinoma： Diagnostic utility and limits

AIM: The utility of serum alpha-fetoprotein (α-FP) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is questionable. High serum levels of chromogranin-A (CgA) have recently been reported in HCC. Impaired hepatic, renal, and heart functions influence circulating CgA. The aim of this study was to assess sensitivity and specificity of serum CgA as a marker of HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). METHODS: Serum CgA levels were measured by RIA in 339 patients of which 54 HCC, 132 LC, 45 chronic hepatitis (CH), 27 chronic heart failure (CHF), 36 chronic renal failure (CRF), 45 chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as disease controls and in 75 healthy controls. Patients with liver disease or IBD and concomitant renal and/or heart failure were excluded. Pearson correlation, non-parametric combination test and confidence interval analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Serum CgA above normal values (100 ng/mL) were found in 83% of HCC patients, in 48% of LC patients, in 20% of CH patients, in 33% of IBD patients, in 92% of CRF patients, in 100% of CHF patients, and in none of the healthy controls. The mean CgA values in HCC (769±1046), in LC (249±369), in CH (87±94), in CRF (1390±1401), in CHF (577±539), in IBD (146±287) were significantly higher than those in healthy controls (48±18). HCC patients had higher CgA values (P<0.01) than LC, CH, and IBD patients but did not differ from those with CRF or CHF. The 95% CI for the mean (250-1289 ng/mL) in HCC patients was selected as a CgA range and the lower value of such range was assumed as cut-off. Sensitivity and specificity of CgA, calculated in relation to the cut-off in patients with cirrhosis and HCC, were respectively 61% (CI 48-73%) and 82% (CI 75-88%). Serum a-FP values were >200 ng/mL in 21% of the HCC patients and in none of the LC patients. No significant correlation was found between a-FP and CgA in patients with HCC and in patients with cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: When HCC is suspected and a-FP is normal or <200 ng/mL, CgA serum values represent a complementary diagnostic tool, unless kidney or heart failure is present.