Implementation of a Regional Perinatal Data Repository from Clinical and Billing Records

Objectives To describe the implementation of the first phase of a regional perinatal data repository and to provide a roadmap for others to navigate technical, privacy, and data governance concerns in implementing similar resources. Methods Our implementation integrated regional physician billing records with maternal and infant electronic health records from an academic delivery hospital. These records, representing births during 2013–2015, constituted a data core supporting linkage to additional ancillary data sets. Measures obtained from pediatric follow-up, urgent care, emergency, and inpatient encounters were linked at the individual level as were measures obtained by home visitors during pre- and postnatal encounters. Residential addresses were geocoded supporting linkage to area-level measures. Results Integrated data contained regional billing records for 69,290 newborns representing approximately 81% of all regional live births and nearly 95% of live births in the region’s most populous county. Billing records linked to 7293 infant delivery hospital records and 7107 corresponding maternal hospital records. Manual review demonstrated 100% validity of matches among audited records. Additionally, 2430 home visiting records were linked to the data core as were pediatric primary care, urgent care, emergency department, and inpatient visits representing 42,541 children. More than 99% of the newborn billing records were geocoded and assigned a census tract identifier. Conclusions for Practice Our approach to methodological and regulatory challenges affords opportunities for expansion of systems to integrate electronic health records originating from additional medical centers as well as individual- and area-level linkage to additional data sets relevant to perinatal health.     

Do Children with Autism Overutilize the Emergency Department? Examining Visit Urgency and Subsequent Hospital Admissions

Background Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are more likely to have difficulties accessing health care compared to other children with special health care needs. National data based on parent report indicate that children with ASD are overutilizing emergency department (ED) services, but data on actual ED use has been limited to children with psychiatric diagnoses. This study examined factors associated with ED utilization (rate, urgency, and hospital admissions) among children with ASD compared to those without ASD. Methods Data from an urban, tertiary children’s hospital level 1 trauma center were examined retrospectively 2006–2009. Anderson’s model of health services utilization served as the study framework. The NYU ED algorithm was used to predict nonurgent visits. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed on the rate, urgency, and subsequent hospital admissions of these ED visits. Results There were 115,443 children 2–21 years old, accounting for a total of 157,902 visits. The top three reasons for visiting the ED for children with and without ASD were acute upper respiratory infections, viral infections and otitis media. Children with ASD had on average 0.26 more ED visits annually than children without ASD (p < 0.01) and were 2.6 % points more likely to have nonurgent visits; p < 0.01). Their visits were also less likely to result in hospital admissions (OR 0. 61; p < 0.01). Conclusions Examination of predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors suggest that children with ASD were more likely to visit the ED and for nonurgent reasons.     

Postpartum Hospital Utilization among Massachusetts Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives This study examined the risk of postpartum hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Methods We used the 2002–2012 Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System and identified deliveries to women with and without IDD. Women with IDD (n?=?1104) or case subjects were identified from the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 9th Revision (ICD-9 CM) codes. The study primary outcome measures were any postpartum hospital admission and any ED visit during three critical postpartum periods (1–42, 43–90, and 1–365 days). We conducted unadjusted and adjusted survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard models to compare the occurrence of first hospital admission or ED visits between women with and without IDD. Results We found that women with IDD had markedly higher rates of postpartum hospital admissions and ED visits during the critical postpartum periods (within 1–42, 43–90, and 91–365 days) after a childbirth. Conclusion for Practice Given the heightened risk of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes and the findings of this study, there is an urgent need for clinical guidelines related to the frequency and timing of postpartum care among new mothers with IDD. Further, this study provides evidence of the need for evidence-based interventions for new mothers with IDD to provide preventive care and routine assessments that would identify and manage complications for both the mother and the infant outside of the traditional postpartum health care framework.     

Women’s Use of Health Care in the First 2 Years Postpartum: Occurrence and Correlates

Objectives We sought to determine rates and correlates of accessing health care in the 2 years following delivery among women at an urban academic medical center. Methods We used electronic medical records, discharge, and billing data to determine the occurrence of primary care, other non-primary outpatient care, emergency department visits, and inpatient admissions among women delivering at a single medical center who had a known primary care affiliation to that medical center over a 5 year period. We explored sociodemographic, clinical, and health care-related factors as correlates of care, using bivariate and multivariable modeling. Results Of 6216 women studied, most (91 %) had had at least one health care visit in the window between 2 months and 2 years postpartum (the “late postpartum period”). The majority (81 %) had had a primary care visit. Factors associated with use of health care in this period included a chronic medical condition diagnosed prior to pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.42, 95 % CI [1.19, 1.71]), prenatal care received in an urban community health center (AOR 1.35 [1.06, 1.73]), having received obstetric (AOR 1.90 [1.51, 2.37]), primary (AOR 2.30 [1.68, 3.23]), or other non-primary outpatient care (AOR 2.35 [1.72, 3.39]) in the first 2 months postpartum, and living closer to the hospital [AOR for residence >17.8 miles from the medical center (AOR 0.74 [0.61, 0.90])]. Having had an obstetrical complication did not increase the likelihood of receipt of care during this window. Conclusions for Practice Among women already enrolled in a primary care practice at our medical center, health care utilization in the late postpartum period is high, but not universal. Understanding the characteristics of women who return for health care during this window, and where they are seen, can improve transitions of care across the life course and can provide opportunities for important and consistent interconception and well-woman messaging.     

Six-Month Emergency Department Use among Older Adults Following Jail Incarceration

Although the number of older adults who are arrested and subject to incarceration in jail is rising dramatically, little is known about their emergency department (ED) use or the factors associated with that use. This lack of knowledge impairs the ability to design evidence-based approaches to care that would meet the needs of this population. This 6-month longitudinal study aimed to determine the frequency of 6-month ED use among 101 adults aged 55 or older enrolled while in jail and to identify factors associated with that use. The primary outcome was self-reported emergency department use within 6 months from baseline. Additional measures included baseline socio-demographics, physical and mental health conditions, geriatric factors (e.g., recent falls, incontinence, functional impairment, concern about post-release safety), symptoms (pain and other symptoms), and behavioral and social health risk factors (e.g., substance use disorders, recent homelessness). Chi-square tests were used to identify baseline factors associated with ED use over 6 months. Participants (average age 60) reported high rates of multimorbidity (61%), functional impairment (57%), pain (52%), serious mental illness (44%), recent homelessness (54%), and/or substance use disorders (69%). At 6 months, 46% had visited the ED at least once; 21% visited multiple times. Factors associated with ED use included multimorbidity (p = 0.01), functional impairment (p = 0.02), hepatitis C infection (p = 0.01), a recent fall (p = 0.03), pain (p < 0.001), loneliness (p = 0.04), and safety concerns (p = 0.01). In this population of older adults in a county jail, geriatric conditions and distressing symptoms were common and associated with 6-month community ED use. Jail is an important setting to develop geriatric care paradigms aimed at addressing comorbid medical, functional, and behavioral health needs and symptomatology in an effort to improve care and decrease ED use in the growing population of criminal justice-involved older adults.     

Sociodemographic Influences of Emergency Department Care for Anxiety Disorders

This study examines variations in content of care for anxiety-related emergency department (ED) visits in the USA across various sociodemographic strata. The 2009–2012 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to identify all visits to general hospital EDs in which an anxiety diagnosis was recorded (n =?1930). Content and equitability of care was assessed utilizing logistic regression models. There were an estimated 1,856,000 ED visits with anxiety-related discharge diagnoses in the USA annually. Content of care and disposition varied by age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Visits by Medicaid patients were more likely than visits by privately insured patients to include a toxicology screen (OR?=?1.67, p <?.05) and visits by patients with either Medicaid or Medicare were less likely to include an EKG (OR?=?0.53, p <?.05 and OR?=?0.52, p <?.05, respectively). Understanding variations in ED care for anxiety can identify opportunities for intervention, both in the ED and upstream in appropriate healthcare settings.     

Opinion of health professionals and drug users before the forthcoming opening of the first drug consumption room in Paris: a quantitative cross-sectional study

Background

On the brink of the opening of the first French drug consumption room in Paris, the general opinion of the local involved health care professionals and drug users was not known. The objective of this study was to determine their expectations and to search for influencing factors.

Method

We carried out a quantitative cross-sectional study. A multiple choice questionnaire was proposed to the surrounding willing general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists, to the emergency doctors of Lariboisière hospital, and to the professionals of the harm reduction facilities and their drug users (PWUD). For each question, there was a choice between seven answers, from “??3” (very negative impact) to “+?3” (very positive impact). The influence of the characteristics of each group on its mean answers was explored by Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman’s tests.

Results

The median expectations among the groups of responding GPs (N =?62), other health care professionals (N =?82), and PWUD (N =?57) were mainly positive. They thought that the drug consumption room (DCR) would improve the health of PWUD, reduce their at-risk behaviors, would not increase drug use or drug dealing in the neighborhood, and would reduce nuisance in the public space. Only the group of GPs expressed that the DCR could decrease the quietness of the neighborhood, and only the group of PWUD had higher expectations that the DCR would decrease the number of arrests and the number of violent behavior. GPs’ expectations were significantly better in terms of health improvement of PWUD and reducing their precariousness if they had a previous experience in addiction medicine (Mann-Whitney, p =?0.004 and p =?0.019), with a longer practice (Spearman’s rho, p =?0.021 and p =?0.009), and if they were currently prescribing opioid substitution treatments (Mann-Whitney, p =?0.030 and p =?0.002).Among non-GPs, those who were working in addiction medicine centers had significantly better expectations than pharmacists, and the professionals of the local emergency department had intermediate expectations.

Conclusions

Health care professionals and drug users had a positive opinion of the to-be-created Parisian drug consumption room. Experience in addiction medicine influenced positively health professionals’ expectations.

     

Care Coordination Associated with Improved Timing of Newborn Primary Care Visits

Objective Despite practice recommendations that all newborns be examined within 3–5 days after discharge, many are not seen within this timeframe. Our objective was to determine the association between care coordination and timing of newborn follow-up. Methods This retrospective study evaluated 6251 newborns from eight maternity hospitals who scheduled a primary care appointment at one of two academic pediatric practices over 3.5 years. Two programs were sequentially implemented: (1) newborn discharge coordination, and (2) primary care intake coordination. Primary outcome was days between discharge and follow-up, dichotomized as ≤ or >5 days. Number of rescheduled appointments and loss to follow-up were also assessed. Adjusted relative risks (RR) and odds ratios (OR) were determined by piecewise generalized linear and logistic regression. Results Among 5943 newborns with a completed visit, 52.9 % were seen within 5 days of discharge (mean 6.7 days). After multivariable adjustment, the pre-exposure period (8 months) demonstrated a downward monthly trend in completing early follow-up (RR 0.93, p < 0.001). After initial program implementation, we observed a 3 % monthly increase (RR 1.03, p < 0.001 for test of slope change from pre-exposure to post-exposure), such that likelihood of recommended follow-up increased by roughly 72 % after discharge coordinator implementation and roughly 33 % after primary care coordinator implementation. The latter was also associated with a 13 % monthly decrease in odds of loss to follow-up (OR 0.87, p < 0.001). Conclusions for Practice Care coordination increases adherence among low income families to recommended newborn follow-up after birth hospitalization.     

Defining the Role of the Community Health Worker within a Federal Healthy Start Care Coordination Team

Introduction Federal and state policies often require utilization of evidence-based home visiting programs. Measurement of specified interventions is important for tracking program implementation and achieving program outcomes. Thus, the Strong Beginnings program worked to define community health worker (CHW) interventions, a core service of the program to improve maternal and child health. Methods A workgroup consisting of CHWs, supervisors and other program staff was created in order to develop and define specific CHW interventions within a nurse or social worker care team. Basic interventions were first compared to the nurse or social worker care coordinator home visiting interventions by risk topic. The evaluator then grouped each CHW intervention into categories per risk domain using thematic analysis and assigned a CHW core function or role based on literature review findings. The workgroup confirmed the results. The workgroup then continued discussions to further enhance CHW interventions per risk domain once the general structure was created. Results The workgroup identified seven core functions and 28 maternal and child health risk topics to be addressed by the CHW. The process resulted in a detailed document of program interventions that the CHWs use to guide care. Conclusions The process helped CHWs feel more valued with their role in team care. The specified interventions will help others understand the CHW role within the care team, ensure consistent interventions are delivered across program partners, provide a foundation to better understand how specific CHW contributions are related to health outcomes, and support program sustainability.     

The Association Between Unhealthy Alcohol Use and Acute Care Expenditures in the 30 Days Following Hospital Discharge Among Older Veterans Affairs Patients with a Medical Condition

Hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of discharge are costly. Heavy alcohol use could predict increased risk for post-discharge acute care. This study assessed 30-day acute care utilization and expenditures for different categories of alcohol use. Veterans Affairs (VA) patients age ≥65 years with past-year alcohol screening, hospitalized for a medical condition, were included. VA and Medicare health care utilization data were used. Two-part models adjusted for patient demographics. Among 416,050 hospitalized patients, 25% had 30-day acute care use. Nondrinking patients (n?=?267,746) had increased probability of acute care use, mean utilization days, and expenditures (difference of $345; 95% CI $268–$423), relative to low-risk drinkers (n?=?105,023). High-risk drinking patients (n?=?5,300) had increased probability of acute care use and mean utilization days, but not expenditures. Although these patients did not have greater acute care expenditures than low-risk drinking patients, they may nevertheless be vulnerable to poor post-discharge outcomes.     

Referral patterns,delays, and equity in access to advanced paediatric emergency care in Vietnam

Background

Quality emergency care is a critical component of a well-functioning health system. However, severely ill children often face barriers to timely, appropriate care in less-developed health systems. Such barriers disproportionately affect poorer children, and may be particularly acute when children seek advanced emergency care. We examine predictors of increased acuity and patient outcomes at a tertiary paediatric emergency department to identify barriers to advanced emergency care among children.

Methods

We analysed a sample of 557 children admitted to a paediatric referral hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam. We examined associations between socio-demographic and facility characteristics, referrals and transfers, and patient outcomes. We used generalized ordered logistic regression to examine predictors of increased acuity on arrival.

Results

Most children accessing advanced emergency care were under two years of age (68.4%). Pneumonia was the most prevalent diagnosis (23.7%). Children referred from lower-level facilities experienced higher acuity on arrival (p?=?.000), were more likely to be admitted to an ICU (p?=?.000), and were more likely to die during hospitalization (p?=?.009). The poorest children [OR?=?4.98, (1.82–13.61)], and children entering care at provincial hospitals [OR?=?3.66, (2.39–5.63)] and other lower-level facilities [OR?=?3.24, (1.78–5.88)] had significantly higher odds of increased acuity on arrival.

Conclusions

The poorest children, who were more likely to enter care at lower-level facilities, were especially disadvantaged. While delays in entry to care were not predictive of acuity, children referred to tertiary care from lower-level facilities experienced worse outcomes. Improvements in triage, stabilization, and referral linkages at all levels should reduce within-system delays, increasing timely access to advanced emergency care for all children.

     

“Hidden” Value: How Indirect Benefits of Health Information Exchange Further Promote Sustainability

Background

Health information exchanges (HIEs) have already demonstrated direct value in controlling the costs associated with utilization of emergency department services and with inpatient admissions from the emergency department. HIEs may also affect inpatient admissions originating from outside of the emergency department.

Objective

To assess if a potential association exists between a community-based HIE being used in hospital emergency departments and inpatient admissions emanating from outside of the emergency department.

Methods

The study design was observational, with an eligible population of fully insured plan members who sought emergency department care on at least 2 occasions over the study period between December 2008 and March 2010. Utilization data, obtained from medical and pharmacy claims, were matched to a list of emergency department utilizers where HIE querying could have occurred. Of the eligible members, 1482 underwent propensity score matching to create two 325-member groups—(1) a test group in which the HIE database was queried for all members in all of their emergency department visits, and (2) a control group in which the HIE database was not queried for any of the members in any emergency department visit.

Results

A post–propensity matching analysis showed that although the test group had more admissions per 1000 members overall (199 more admissions per 1000 members) than the control group, these admissions might have been more appropriate for inpatient treatment in general. The relative risk of an admission by the time of a first emergency department visit was 28% higher in the control group than the test group, although by the time of a second emergency department visit, it was only 8% lower in the control group. Moreover, test group admissions resulted in less time spent as inpatients, which was denoted by bed days per 1000 members (771 fewer bed days per 1000 members) and by average length of stay (4.27 days per admission for all admissions and 0.95 days per admission when catastrophic cases were removed).

Conclusions

Based on these results, HIE availability in the care of patients presenting to the emergency department is associated with fewer inpatient hospital days and a shorter length of stay, even when catastrophic cases are removed from the analysis. Although many factors can play a role in this finding, it is possible that HIE promotion of more appropriate hospital admissions from outside of the emergency department is one cause. Such “indirect” value shows that the return on investment found by HIEs may even be greater than previously calculated. Additional study is warranted to further the business case for HIE investment for the various stakeholders who are interested in supporting HIE sustainability.The eighteenth-century essayist and satirist Jonathan Swift made the observation that “vision is the art of seeing things invisible.” So, too, is “the art of seeing things invisible” a key for the ongoing sustainability of health information exchange (HIE). HIEs have long been theorized to provide a number of tangible benefits. These benefits accrue through the provision of medical history at the point of care: decreases in redundant laboratory testing, improved provider efficiency, improved care coordination, increased quality of care, and the ultimate goal of an overall decreased cost of care.

KEY POINTS

• ▸ Health information exchanges (HIEs) have shown direct value in controlling costs related to emergency department utilization and inpatient admissions from the emergency department.
• ▸ The costs associated with inpatient admissions, which account for the majority of healthcare dollars spent, are on the rise; 44% of all hospital admissions originate in the emergency department.
• ▸ Two previous studies have shown average savings ranging from $26 to $29 for HIE use in the emergency department; a third study showed a decrease in hospital admissions from the emergency department as well.
• ▸ The current study shows that making HIE available for patients in the emergency department reduces the length of hospital stays for admissions not tied to emergency department services.
• ▸ The noted decreased length of stay, even when catastrophic cases are removed from the analysis, suggests that the availability of HIEs in the emergency department reduces inpatient utilization emanating from outside of the emergency department.
• ▸ These findings further support that incorporating the use of HIEs in the emergency department can reduce overall hospital admissions rates, lower the length of hospital stay, and, therefore, decrease the associated costs.

More recently, we have witnessed a seismic movement from theory to practice with definitive dollar savings noted for HIE use in emergency departments in Indianapolis, IN,1 and in Milwaukee, WI2 ($26 and $29 savings per emergency department visit, respectively),1,2 as well as in Memphis, TN (approximately net $1.1 million in savings for the community at large).3 Moreover, in Memphis, the great majority of dollar savings (97.6%) resulted from the avoidance of inpatient admissions from the emergency department.3 Inpatient admissions account for the preponderance of dollars spent in healthcare. Costs for inpatient admissions in the United States are increasing; during calendar year 2004, the average inpatient admission cost was $10,0304; by 2008, this increased to $15,017.5A community replicating the Memphis experience by mitigating inpatient admissions from the emergency department should experience financial savings as Memphis did. The Memphis experience showed that HIE availability within the emergency department decreases direct admissions from the emergency department.3 But can HIE availability in the emergency department indirectly impact admissions emanating from outside of the emergency department? Is the risk of any inpatient admission occurring altered by the presence of HIE in the emergency department? If so, the community benefits indirectly, as well as directly, from having said HIE occurs within the emergency department. However, achieving that benefit requires HIE sustainability, and HIE sustainability requires a stable source of funding. Enhancing the business case for HIE sustainability by uncovering such indirect or “hidden” value may help validate the need for external support and funding.     

Health Care Professionals and the Employment-Related Needs of Cancer Survivors

Introduction Individuals diagnosed with cancer look to health care professionals as primary sources of information. This positions staff in oncology settings in an ideal role to inform patients, who continue workforce participation in increasing numbers, about resources that might help them to handle work-related issues related to their oncological symptoms. This article reports on findings from a survey of staff that provide nonmedical services to cancer patients in two Houston area hospital systems. The impetus for this survey was two-fold: the trend in recent years for increasing numbers of cancer survivors to stay in the workforce after or even during treatment, and low levels of awareness that these employees are eligible for protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and its 2008 amendments (ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553, 2008; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12111-17, 2006). The survey assesses perceptions of the effects of cancer on patients’ employment status, levels of knowledge about supports to address these employment-related needs, and respondents’ preferred modes for information receipt. The latter topic serves the purpose of tailoring training activities to the respondents’ informational needs and learning preferences. Methods Data were collected via an online survey administered in two Houston-area hospital systems. This article reports on the findings from 86 respondents. Results Tenure as measured by years in oncology is related positively to level of knowledge about disability-related benefits, legislation and programs (r = .32, P < .01). Respondents with more years in their profession worked with patients whom they reported had a higher number of cancer side effects that “created work difficulties for patients” (r = .24, P < .05). The number of side effects was in turn positively associated with negative effects of the diagnosis at work (r = .27, P < .05). A higher score of negative effects of the cancer diagnosis at work in turn correlated with unwanted consequences of disclosing the cancer at work (r = .36, P < .01). No statistically significant correlations were observed among the variables measuring respondents’ reported knowledge of disability-related benefits, laws and programs, their perception of patients’ level of understanding of these topics, and reports of patients’ receipt of reasonable accommodation. Conclusions Health care professionals who treat cancer patients could benefit from training resources about how survivors might address their employment-related needs, including how to convey that knowledge to their patients. Mentoring programs might also have positive outcomes, since respondents with greater tenure in oncology-related settings reported higher levels of knowledge about disability-related topics.     

Improving Rates of Early Entry Prenatal Care in an Underserved Population

Introduction Early prenatal care can improve pregnancy outcomes, reduce complications, and ensure a healthier pregnancy. Unfortunately, many pregnant women do not seek early care. This research provides a framework for improving prenatal care in a low income community-based obstetrics clinic. Methods A multi-disciplinary quality improvement initiative was implemented at a large federally qualified health clinic in Houston, Texas to improve the rate of early entry into prenatal care by identifying barriers through patient surveys, focus groups, stakeholder feedback, and improving processes to reduce these barriers. Results A significant increase in early prenatal care was achieved by redesigning operational and clinical processes to improve access to care, expand patient education and outreach, increase resources, extend hours of operation, and increase presumptive insurance eligibility. Three months post implementation, an increase of 44.5% (p?<?0.001) occurred in patients who had a prenatal visit in the first trimester. Patients with early prenatal care had better obstetrical and neonatal outcomes; however, the results were not statistically significant likely due to the small sample size. Discussion This quality improvement project provides various strategies and resources for other community-based clinics to consider when seeking improvement in their rates of early prenatal care.     

Statewide Policy Change in Pediatric Dental Care,and the Impact on Pediatric Dental and Physician Visits

Introduction In 2007, the California signed legislation mandating a dental visit for all children entering kindergarten or first grade; no such mandate was made for physician visits. This study examines the impact of this policy change on the risk factors associated with obtaining pediatric dental and physician health care visits. Methods Every 2 years, California Health Interview Survey conducts a statewide survey on a representative community sample. This cross-sectional study took advantage of these data to conduct a “natural experiment” assessing the impact of this policy change on both pediatric physician and dental care visits in the past year. Samples included surveys of adults and children (ages 5–11) on years 2005 (n?=?5096), 2007 (n?=?4324) and 2009 (n?=?4100). Results Although few changes in risk factors were noted in pediatric physician visits, a gradual decrease in risk factors was found in pediatric dental visits from 2005 to 2009. Report of no dental visit was less likely for: younger children (OR -0.81, CI 0.75–0.88), insured children (OR 0.34, CI 0.22–0.53), and children who had a physician’s visit last year (OR 0.37, CI 0.25–0.53) in 2005. By 2007, absence of insurance was the only risk factor related to having no dental visit (OR 0.34, CI 0.19–0.61). By 2009, no a priori measured risk factors were associated with not having a dental visit for children aged 5–11 years. Conclusions A statewide policy mandating pediatric dental visits appears to have reduced disparities. A policy for medical care may contribute to similar benefits.     

“Top Performing” US Hospitals and the Health Status of Counties they Serve

This study (a) examined the relationships between “top performing” US hospitals and the health status of counties they serve and (b) compared the health status of “top performing” US hospital counties versus that of remaining US counties. Statistical analyses considered US News and World Report Honor Roll ranking data, as a measure of hospital performance, and County Health Rankings (CHR) data, as a measure of county health status. “Top performing” hospital Honor Roll scores were correlated with measures of Clinical Care (p?<?0.001). Counties with “top performing” US hospitals presented greater health status with regard to All Health Outcomes (p?<?0.001), Length of Life (p?<?0.001), Quality of Life (p?<?0.001), All Health Factors (p?<?0.001), Health Behaviors (p?<?0.001), and Clinical Care (p?<?0.001), than compared to remaining US counties. Hospital impact on county health status remains primarily recognized in clinical care and not in overall health. Also, counties that contain a “top performing” US hospital tend to present lower health risks to their citizens than compared to other US counties.     

Payment Source and Emergency Management of Deliberate Self-Harm

Objectives. We investigated whether health insurance type (private vs Medicaid) influences the delivery of acute mental health care to patients with deliberate self-harm.Methods. Using National Medicaid Analytic Extract Files (2006) and MarketScan Research Databases (2005–2007), we analyzed claims focusing on emergency episodes of deliberate self-harm of Medicaid- (n = 8228) and privately (n = 2352) insured adults. We analyzed emergency department mental health assessments and outpatient mental health visits in the 30 days following the emergency visit for discharged patients.Results. Medicaid-insured patients were more likely to be discharged (62.7%), and among discharged patients they were less likely to receive a mental health assessment in the emergency department (47.8%) and more likely to receive follow-up outpatient mental health care (52.9%) than were privately insured patients (46.9%, 57.3%, and 41.2%, respectively).Conclusions. Acute emergency management of deliberate self-harm is less intensive for Medicaid- than for privately insured patients, although discharged Medicaid-insured patients are more likely to receive follow-up care. Programmatic reforms are needed to improve access to emergency mental health services, especially in hospitals that serve substantial numbers of Medicaid-insured patients.In several medical contexts, insurance status affects access and quality of care.1,2 In relation to privately insured patients, Medicaid-insured patients are generally less likely to receive care, and the care they receive less often meets guideline-based standards.3,4 At a time of intense pressure to rein in Medicaid costs, the risks of insurance-related disparities in access and quality of care are especially great. Despite keen interest among health care policymakers, however, little information exists in the peer-reviewed literature on the comparative access and quality of mental health care provided to Medicaid- and commercially insured patients.The emergency department is an important setting in which to evaluate mental health care of Medicaid-insured and privately insured adults. In the management of deliberate self-harm, emergency departments have an opportunity to provide potentially lifesaving services. A key goal involves improving the recognition and treatment of psychiatric disorders in high-risk patients.5 One particularly high-risk group includes patients who go to emergency departments pursuant to self-harm, which may or may not involve suicidal intent.6,7 During the first year following emergency treatment of deliberate self-harm, suicide risk increases 30- to 130-fold.8–10 Psychiatric disorders, though exceedingly prevalent among adults with deliberate self-harm,11,12 are not always recognized or treated. Because of strong connections between psychiatric disorder, self-harm, and suicide, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence recommends that all individuals attending emergency departments with deliberate self-harm receive a mental health evaluation before emergency department discharge.13 Mental health assessment provides opportunities to evaluate aggression, impulsivity, hopelessness, and other symptoms that bear on suicide risk.14The quality of mental health care in emergency departments varies. In 1 statewide survey, most emergency departments did not have a mental health professional to evaluate and treat patients with self-harm.15 Only about one half of emergency department patients in the Medicaid program who come in with deliberate self-harm and are discharged to the community receive a mental health assessment.16We compared the mental health care received by adult Medicaid and privately insured beneficiaries who came to emergency departments with deliberate self-harm. We first compared these 2 groups with respect to the likelihood of hospital admission. Among those who were discharged to the community, we assessed the probability of receiving a mental health assessment in the emergency department and of receiving outpatient mental health treatment within the following 30 days. We hypothesized that Medicaid-insured patients with self-harm would be less likely than would their privately insured counterparts to be admitted to the hospital and that Medicaid-insured patients who were discharged to the community would be less likely than would privately insured patients to receive an emergency mental health assessment and follow-up outpatient mental health care.     

Understanding Factors Associated with Postpartum Visit Attendance and Contraception Choices: Listening to Low-Income Postpartum Women and Health Care Providers

Background While there is considerable variability with respect to attendance at the postpartum visit, not much is known about women’s preferences with respect to postpartum care. Likewise, there is also limited information on providers’ practices regarding the postpartum visit and care including the delivery of contraception. To understand and address deficits in the delivery and utilization of postpartum care, we examined the perceptions of low-income postpartum women with respect to barriers to and preferences for the timing and location of the postpartum visit and receipt of contraception. We also examined providers’ current prenatal and postnatal care practices for promoting the use of postpartum care and their attitudes toward alternative approaches for delivering contraceptive services in the postpartum period. Methods Qualitative face-to-face interviews were completed with 20 postpartum women and in-depth qualitative phone interviews were completed with 12 health care providers who had regular contact with postpartum women. Interviews were coded using Atlas.ti software and themes were identified. Results Women believed that receiving care during the postpartum period was an important resource for monitoring physical and mental health and also strongly supported the provision of contraception earlier than the 6-week postpartum visit. Providers reported barriers to women’s use of postpartum care on the patient, provider, and system levels. However, providers were receptive to exploring new clinical practices that may widen the reach of postpartum care and increase access to postpartum contraception. Conclusion Approaches that increase the flexibility and convenience of postpartum care and the delivery of postpartum contraception may increase the likelihood that women will take advantage of essential postpartum services.