A randomized trial of visual impairment interventions for nursing home residents: Study design,baseline characteristics and visual loss

Introduction Visual impairment among nursing home residents is higher than in community-dwelling elderly. The provision of eye care services may be beneficial to nursing home patients. Our project, a randomized trial of vision restoration and rehabilitation in nursing home residents, compares usual care to targeted interventions. In this paper, we present the baseline characteristics of our sample within the nursing homes. Methods Twenty-eight nursing homes on Maryland’s Eastern Shore were matched in pairs by size and payment type. Each pair was randomized to usual care or targeted intervention. Habitual and bestcorrected acuity was attempted, using standard letter symbol/charts and grating acuity charts. Visual impairment was vision in the better eye <20/40 on letter and/or grating acuity. The MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) was used to determine cognitive impairment. Results Of those participants eligible to be screened, 40% had severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score 0-9). No measure of acuity could be ascertained on 18% of eligibles. Among the 1305 persons with acuity data, 38% had presenting vision worse than 20/40. After refractive correction, 29% had visual impairment. There was no difference by race or gender in those with visual impairment, although they were older, compared to those without visual loss. Conclusions The nursing home residents had high rates of both cognitive impairment and visual impairment, creating a challenging environment for visual intervention. By improving access to eye care within the context of the clinical trial, and changing either the magnitude of visual loss or the resultant impact on function, we hope to demonstrate a change in the quality of life for nursing home residents.     

Grating visual acuity using the preferential-looking method in elderly nursing home residents

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of two approaches to visual acuity testing in a group of nursing home residents with cognitive impairment. The study was a cross-sectional comparison of the effectiveness of two tests of visual acuity. METHODS: Nursing home residents participating in a clinical trial were tested with both recognition acuity charts and grating acuity cards (Teller) by masked observers. RESULTS: Of the nursing home residents (n = 656) who participated in the study, 86% could respond to visual acuity testing in at least one eye. Eighty-four percent were testable using Teller cards versus 73% who were testable by Early-Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts or Lea symbol charts. Forty-one percent of individuals with MiniMental Status Examination (MMSE) scores lower than 10 were testable by recognition acuity, whereas 61% were testable with grating acuity cards. Grating acuity correlated well with recognition acuity (R = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). The correlation was slightly lower in individuals with decreased MMSE scores. Although grating acuity was one line better than recognition acuity on average and median acuities were the same, 24% of individuals had results that differed by three or more lines. CONCLUSIONS: Teller acuity cards can effectively test the vision in cognitively impaired individuals who are not testable by conventional means. Grating acuity results correlated well with those of recognition acuity, although differences of three or more lines were not uncommon. Wider use of grating acuity testing allows a more complete assessment of visual function in the cognitively impaired elderly.     

Impact of cataract surgery on health-related quality of life in nursing home residents

AIM: To assess the impact of cataract surgery in nursing home residents on health-related quality of life, as compared to those who have cataracts but who do not undergo surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study enrolled 30 nursing home residents (>or=60 years old) who had cataracts and underwent cataract surgery, and evaluated vision-targeted and generic health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms before and approximately 4 months after surgery. This cataract surgery group was compared to 15 nursing home residents who had cataracts but who did not have surgery, over the same timeframe. RESULTS: Visual acuity for near and distance and contrast sensitivity improved following cataract surgery (p<0.001). Adjusting for age differences in the two groups, the cataract surgery group exhibited significant score improvement in the general vision (p = 0.005), reading (p = 0.001), psychological distress (p = 0.015), and social interaction (p = 0.033) subscales of the Nursing Home Vision-targeted Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire and the VF-14 (p = 0.004). There were no group differences in the SF-36, Geriatric Depression Scale or the Cataract Symptom Score. CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents who underwent cataract surgery because of functional problems experienced significant improvements in their vision-targeted health-related quality of life, in addition to dramatically improved vision.     

Eye disease in a geriatric nursing home population

All 225 tenants (181 female and 44 male patients) of a nursing home in New York City underwent eye examinations at least once within a 1-year period to determine the prevalence of senile cataract, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), open-angle glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy. The average age was 85.4 years (range, 60-108 years). With aphakia and pseudophakia included in the diagnosis of "cataract," the respective prevalences were found to be 81, 37, 11, and 2.1%. There was a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of cataracts and AMD in those patients 85 years of age or older when compared with the younger patients in the nursing home (P less than 0.05). Of those patients without organic brain syndrome, 44% (66/151) had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better in at least one eye. Thirty percent (45/151) had a visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in both eyes. Although this study has no control population of patients outside nursing homes, a review of the literature suggests that geriatric nursing home patients may have a higher prevalence of eye disease than their chronologic peers outside nursing homes. Further study is necessary to determine whether residents of geriatric nursing homes are receiving adequate ophthalmic care.     

Monocular and binocular acuity estimation in 18- to 36-month-olds: acuity card results

The acuity card procedure is a useful method for measuring visual acuity in infants 1 to 12 months of age. The results of the present study indicate that the procedure is also a viable method for estimating acuity in children 18 to 36 months of age. Monocular and binocular estimates of acuity were obtained with the acuity card procedure on 36 normal children, 9 each at ages 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. At each of the ages, means and SD's of acuity estimates agreed well with acuity norms from established operant procedures. Mean durations for monocular and binocular estimates averaged 2 to 4 min, and nearly 100% of children were tested successfully both monocularly and binocularly. The flexibility of the required response and the short test times make the acuity cards a promising test of visual acuity in this typically difficult-to-test age range.     

Ambulatory photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in nursing homes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and cost of screening for diabetic eye disease in homebound nursing home residents not attending a systematic screening programme. METHODS: Postal survey identification of residents with diabetes in all nursing homes in Liverpool. An ophthalmologist and nurse performed Bailey-Lovie logmar visual acuity (VA), portable slit-lamp examination, fundus photography, and subjective assessment of ability to cooperate with treatment in a sample of homes. Modified Wisconsin photographic grading was performed. Screen-positive patients were invited to a dedicated assessment clinic. Sight-threatening diabetic eye disease (STED) was defined as any of: moderate preproliferative retinopathy or worse, circinate maculopathy, or exudate within 1 disc diameter of fixation. RESULTS: A total of 54 (78%) nursing homes responded reporting 199/2427 (8.2%) residents with diabetes. Of these, 64/80 (80%) residents in 17 homes were examined: VA possible in 50 (78%); slit-lamp examination in 56 (88%); gradable photographs in at least one eye in 34 (53%); STED in 12 (35%) patients. In all, 35 (70%) patients had Snellen-equivalent VA worse than 6/12 in the better eye, of whom 13 (26%) were worse than 6/60. Of 29 screen positive patients, 12 attended the assessment clinic: one was unable to cooperate outside the home; 11 continue under ophthalmic review, four for previously undetected STED of which one listed for laser photocoagulation. Total cost pound 16,980; cost per screen event pound 60.30. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic eye screening in homebound patients with diabetes detects disease but follow-up and treatment is only feasible in a small proportion and at high cost. Alternative targeted assessment is recommended.     

Visual impairment and nursing home placement in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

Purpose To assess whether visual impairment at baseline is an independent contributor to subsequent nursing home placement during a 6-year follow-up. Methods 3654 non-institutionalised people aged 49+ years (82.4% of those eligible) who participated in baseline examinations of the Blue Mountains Eye Study (1992–94) were followed during 1997–99. Presenting visual acuity was measured with current glasses and a standardised refraction performed. We defined visual impairment as visual acuity reduced to =20/40. Permanent nursing home admissions during follow-up were confirmed by the regional Aged Care Assessment Team and government subsidy payment records. Results At baseline, 511 participants had presenting visual impairment. After refraction, vision improved to 20/30 or better in 346 persons (68%, “correctable”), while 165 (32%) remained visually impaired. During follow-up, 162 study participants (5.0%) were admitted permanently to a nursing home. The age-adjusted 6-year incidence was 3.6% for participants with normal vision, 16.2% for those with visual impairment after best correction and 8.1% for those with “correctable” visual impairment. After adjusting for non-cognitive factors that predicted nursing home placement, the relative risk (RR) for nursing home admission among persons with visual impairment after best correction was 1.8 (95% CI 1.1–2.9). A similar magnitude of association was found among persons with “correctable” visual impairment (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.1). For each line of reduction in presenting visual acuity at baseline, there was a 7% increased risk of subsequent nursing home placement. Conclusions This study suggests that decreased vision may be a marker or contributing factor to subsequent nursing home placement in general older populations.     

Grating and recognition acuities of young amblyopes.

The visual acuities of 36 young amblyopes were determined by (a) conventional recognition tests (near and distance) and (b) an adapted grating acuity card procedure. Considerable agreement between the estimates of acuity obtained with each method was demonstrated, which was generally less than, or equal to, the mean difference between adjacent Snellen lines (4.5 c deg-1). Estimates of grating acuity obtained with vertical gratings did not differ significantly from those obtained with horizontal gratings. There was no difference between the subjects' ability to detect the grating (acuity) and accurately to discriminate target orientation (horizontal or vertical). The results of the experiment are discussed in relation to previous findings of a discrepancy between grating and recognition acuities in amblyopia, and the clinical use of the acuity card procedure.     

Monocular acuity in normal infants: the acuity card procedure

An "acuity card" technique has been developed for rapid assessment of visual acuity in infants. In this procedure an adult observer shows the infant a series of cards that contain gratings of various spatial frequencies and estimates acuity as the highest spatial frequency that the infant is judged to see. The present paper shows that the acuity card procedure can be used in a laboratory setting to estimate both monocular and binocular acuity in infants 1 to 12 months of age. Four monocular and two binocular acuity estimates were obtained on 36 normal infants, six each at ages 4, 8, and 16 weeks and 6, 9, and 12 months. Acuity estimate means and SD's agreed well with previously established preferential looking (PL) norms for each of the test ages. Time required for a monocular or a binocular test averaged 3 to 6 min.     

Nursing home glaucoma and visual acuity screening results in western Oklahoma

Six hundred and four patients from 19 nursing homes in rural western Oklahoma underwent visual acuity and glaucoma screening. Thirty-seven percent (221/604) had corrected near visual acuity less than or equal to 20/200 in one or both eyes. Fourty-nine percent (298/604) had best distance visual acuity less than or equal to 20/200 in one or both eyes. Improvement of distance visual acuity of two or more lines of vision by the use of pinhole viewing (indicating a possible need for glasses lens change) was helpful in only 12% (36/298) of patients with distance visual acuity less than or equal to 20/200. Fifteen percent (50/316) had intraocular pressure (Schiotz tonometry) greater than or equal to 24 mm hg. The incidence of significant visual acuity impairments and borderline-elevated glaucoma testing in the nursing home population is significantly higher than for a comparable general community vision and glaucoma screening of a more mobile and youthful population (Table 7). Eleven percent (66/604) were determined to have had an eye examination (ophthalmological or optometric) within the previous two years. Because potentially severe visual loss caused by cataracts, glaucoma, some forms of macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy may be reduced by timely medical or surgical eye treatment, the study suggests that many nursing home patients who might benefit from ophthalmologic care are currently not receiving it. Consideration, therefore, should be given for similar future screenings at other nursing home populations.     

Epidemiology of pterygium in Victoria, Australia

AIM: To describe the prevalence of and risk factors for pterygium in a population based sample of residents of the Australian state of Victoria who were aged 40 years and older. METHODS: The strata comprised nine randomly selected clusters from the Melbourne statistical division, 14 nursing homes randomly selected from the nursing homes within a 5 kilometre radius of the nine Melbourne clusters, and four randomly selected clusters from rural Victoria. Pterygium was measured in millimetres from the tip to the middle of the base. During an interview, people were queried about previous ocular surgery, including surgical removal of pterygium, and their lifetime exposure to sunlight. RESULTS: 5147 people participated. They ranged in age from 40 to 101 years and 2850 (55.4%) were female. Only one person in the Melbourne cohort reported previous pterygium surgery, and seven rural residents reported previous surgery; this information was unavailable for the nursing home residents. Pterygium was present upon clinical examination in 39 (1.2%) of the 3229 Melbourne residents who had the clinical examination, six (1. 7%) of the nursing home residents, and 96 (6.7%) of the rural residents. The overall weighted population rate in the population was 2.83% (95% CL 2.35, 3.31). The independent risk factors for pterygium were found to be age (OR=1.23, 95% CL=1.06, 1.44), male sex (OR=2.02, 95% CL=1.35, 3.03), rural residence (OR=5.28, 95% CL=3. 56, 7.84), and lifetime ocular sun exposure (OR=1.63, 95% CL=1.18, 2. 25). The attributable risk of sunlight and pterygium was 43.6% (95% CL=42.7, 44.6). The result was the same when ocular UV-B exposure was substituted in the model for broad band sun exposure. CONCLUSION: Pterygium is a significant public health problem in rural areas, primarily as a result of ocular sun exposure.     

Validation of the acuity card procedure for assessment of infants with ocular disorders

The acuity card procedure has been shown to be a rapid method for the assessment of monocular and binocular grating acuity in normal infants from birth through 36 months of age. The current study seeks to validate the procedure further by using the acuity cards to assess 20 2- to 8-month-old infant patients with ocular disorders, including aphakia, strabismus, ptosis, and orbital hemangioma. Assessments were made with the acuity cards by two different observers, both blind to the infant's diagnosis, and by a third observer using a traditional forced-choice preferential looking (FPL) procedure. One hundred percent of the infant patients completed both binocular and monocular acuity card testing in an average time of 8 minutes per test. Interobserver agreement between acuity card observers and inter-technique agreement were high, and were sustained in individual cases in which the infant's acuity was not predictable from its visible signs. These results help to establish the potential clinical utility of the acuity card procedure for the assessment of infant patients.     

Interobserver agreement for grating acuity and letter acuity assessment in 1- to 5.5-year-olds with severe retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate interobserver test-retest reliability of the Teller Acuity Card procedure for assessment of grating acuity at ages 1, 2, 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 years, for HOTV letter acuity at 3.5 and 4.5 years, and for Early-Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter acuity at 5.5 years in the multicenter study of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP). METHODS: Subjects were the 73 participants in the CRYO-ROP study who had acuity assessed at one or more ages by two of the seven study visual acuity testers as part of a quality control procedure. All subjects had birth weights of less than 1251 g, and all had severe (threshold) ROP in one or both eyes. RESULTS: For sighted eyes, interobserver agreement for grating acuity (across all five test ages) was 0.5 octave or better in 57% of eyes and 1.0 octave or better in 85% of eyes. Interobserver agreement for letter acuity (3.5-, 4.5-, and 5.5-year test ages) was 0.5 octave or better in 71% of eyes and 1.0 octave or better in 93% of eyes. For all eyes (sighted and blind), Kendall rank correlation coefficients (Tau) were 0.86, 0.83, and 0.94 for grating, HOTV, and ETDRS acuity, respectively. Kappa statistics on data from all eyes indicated excellent interobserver agreement for grating, HOTV, and ETDRS acuity (0.73, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively). Interobserver agreement was not related to age or to severity of retinal residua of ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent interobserver agreement for grating acuity measurements and for letter acuity measurements was obtained. Results suggest that with careful training and implementation of quality control procedures, high reliability of visual acuity results is possible in clinical populations of young children.     

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Australian adults

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and correlates of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Australians aged 40 years and older. METHODS: Cluster, stratified sampling was employed to identify a cohort representative of the population of the state of Victoria aged 40 years and older that included urban, rural, and nursing home residents. A standardized personal interview and clinical eye examination, including intraocular pressure, were performed at locally established test sites. The presence of any pseudoexfoliation material on the iris or lens capsule was noted on dilated slit-lamp examination. Participants were classified as having pseudoexfoliation syndrome if any pseudoexfoliation material was present in either eye. Univariate analyses with t tests and chi-square were first employed to evaluate risk factors for pseudoexfoliation. Any factors with P <.10 were then fitted in a backward stepwise logistic regression model. For the final multivariate models, P <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 3,271 of the urban residents (83% of eligible), 403 nursing home residents (90% of eligible), and 1473 rural residents (92%) participated. The urban residents ranged in age from 40 to 98 years (mean = 59), and 1,511 (46%) were men. The nursing home residents ranged in age from 46 to 101 years (mean 82), and 85 (21%) were men. The rural residents ranged in age from 40 to 103 years (mean 60), and 701 (47.5%) were men. Participants with bilateral cataract extraction were excluded from further analyses. The overall rate of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in this population was 0.98% (95% confidence limit = 0.57, 1.28). The prevalence of pseudoexfoliation material in either eye increased significantly with age. No cases of pseudoexfoliation syndrome were observed in people aged 90 years and older. However, people with bilateral cataract surgery had been excluded from these analyses. After adjusting for age and cataract, only glaucoma remained significantly related to pseudoexfoliation (odds ratio = 3.80, 95% confidence limit = 1.73, 8.33). DISCUSSION: In conclusion, we found only two strong correlates of pseudoexfoliation in our population-based sample of Victorians aged 40 years and older: age and glaucoma.     

Visual acuity measurements in a national sample of British elderly people

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that visual function has an important role in the quality of life in later years, very few studies have measured visual acuity in population based nationwide samples of British elderly people. Such measurements were carried out in the context of the national diet and nutrition survey of people aged 65 years or over (NDNS). METHODS: NDNS participants, who were living in 80 different randomly selected postcode areas of mainland Britain, were visited at their home by a nurse who measured visual acuity at 3 metres, using the Glasgow acuity card (GAC) method. In addition, a brief questionnaire related to ocular health was administered. RESULTS: Visual acuity was measured in 1362 NDNS participants who were not classified as mentally impaired. Visual impairment (using the WHO low vision criteria) was measured in 195 (14.3%) subjects. Prevalence of visual impairment increased significantly with age (65-74 years 3.1%; 75-84 years 11.6%; 85+ years 35.5%, p<0.001 for trend). Impaired vision was more common in subjects living in a nursing home (odds ratio adjusted for age 2.59 (95% CI 2.23 to 2. 96)) and in women (odds ratio adjusted for age 1.55 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.89)). 132 (9.7%) subjects had previously undergone cataract surgery and another 157 (11.5%) had been told that they currently had cataract. Vision improved 0.2 log units or more (at least one Snellen line) with the aid of a pinhole occluder in 289 subjects (21. 2%). CONCLUSION: Results of this nationwide, community based study confirm that problems with poor distance visual acuity exist in a substantial part of the elderly community, particularly in women and people living in nursing homes.     

Visual acuity and its meridional variations in children aged 7-60 months

A new operant procedure was used to assess grating acuity in children aged 7-60 months. The procedure was successful for 95% of the children sampled and had high test-retest reliability. Visual acuity for main axis (horizontal and vertical) gratings improved from 6/15 at 12 months to 6/6 at 60 months. For the 7-16 month age group, preferential-looking estimates of acuity agreed well with operant estimates. Acuity for oblique gratings was approximately 1/4 octave lower than main axis acuity throughout the age range. The results suggest that the human visual system continues to develop throughout the first 5 years of life.     

The epidemiology of cataract in Australia

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and risk factors for cataract in an Australian population aged 40 years and older. METHODS: Participants were recruited by a household census and stratified, random cluster sampling to represent residents of Victoria, Australia, aged 40 years and older. The following information was collected: initial visual acuity and best-corrected visual acuity, demographic details, health history, dietary intake of antioxidants, lifetime ocular ultraviolet B exposure, and clinical eye examination, including lens photography. Cortical opacities were measured in sixteenths. Cortical cataract was defined as opacity greater than or equal to 4/16 of pupil circumference. Nuclear opacities were graded according to the Wilmer cataract grading scheme, and cataract was defined as greater than or equal to nuclear standard 2.0 of four standards. The height and width of any posterior subcapsular opacity was measured and recorded. Posterior subcapsular cataract was defined as posterior subcapsular opacity greater than or equal to 1 mm2. The worse eye was selected for analysis. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to quantify independent risk factors for cataract. RESULTS: A total of 3,271 (83% of eligible) of the urban residents, 403 (90% of eligible) nursing home residents, and 1,473 (92% of eligible) rural residents participated. The urban residents ranged in age from 40 to 98 years (mean, 59 years), and 1,511 (46%) were men. The nursing home residents ranged in age from 46 to 101 years (mean, 82 years), and 85 (21%) were men. The rural residents ranged in age from 40 to 103 years (mean, 60 years), and 701 (47.5%) were men. The overall weighted rate of cortical cataract was 11.3% (95% confidence limits, 9.68%, 13.0%) excluding cataract surgery and 12.1% (95% confidence limits, 10.5%, 13.8%) including cataract surgery. The risk factors for cortical cataract that remained in the multivariate logistic regression model were age, female gender, diabetes duration greater than 5 years, gout duration greater than 10 years, arthritis diagnosis, myopia, use of oral beta-blockers, and increased average annual ocular ultraviolet B exposure. Overall, 12.6% (95% confidence limits, 9.61%, 15.7%) of Victorians aged 40 years and older had nuclear cataract including previous cataract surgery, and 11.6% (95% confidence limits, 8.61%, 14.7%) had nuclear cataract excluding previous cataract surgery. In the urban and rural cohorts, age, female gender, rural residence, brown irides, diabetes diagnosed 5 or more years earlier, myopia, age-related maculopathy, having smoked for greater than 30 years, and an interaction between ocular ultraviolet B exposure and vitamin E were all risk factors for nuclear cataract. The rate of posterior subcapsular cataract excluding previous cataract surgery was 4.08% (95% confidence limits, 3.01%, 5.14%), whereas the overall rate of posterior subcapsular cataract including previous cataract surgery was 4.93% (95% confidence limits, 3.68%, 6.17%) . The independent risk factors for posterior subcapsular cataract in the urban and rural cohorts that remained were age in years, rural location, use of thiazide diuretics, vitamin E intake, and myopia. CONCLUSIONS: The expected increase in the prevalence of cataract with the aging of the population highlights the need to plan appropriate medical services and public health interventions for primary and secondary prevention. Many of the identified risk factors for cataract in the population have the potential for being modified through public health interventions.     

The evaluation of an online nurse-assisted eye-screening tool in older adults receiving home healthcare

Purpose

To investigate the agreement between an online nurse-assisted eye-screening tool and reference tests in older adults receiving home healthcare and to collect user experiences.

Methods

Older adults (65+) receiving home healthcare were included. Home healthcare nurses assisted in administering the eye-screening tool at participants' homes. Approximately 2 weeks later, a researcher administered reference tests at participants' homes. Experiences from participants and home healthcare nurses were collected. Agreement in outcomes (distance and near visual acuity, with the latter being measured using two different optotypes, and macular problems) between the eye-screening tool and reference clinical testing was compared. A difference of less than ±0.15 logMAR was considered acceptable.

Results

A total of 40 participants were included. Here, we describe the results for the right eye; results for the left eye were similar. The mean difference between the eye-screening tool and reference tests for distance visual acuity was 0.02 logMAR. The mean difference between the eye-screening tool and reference tests using two different optotypes for near visual acuity was 0.06 and 0.03 logMAR, respectively. The majority of the individual data points were within the ±0.15 logMAR threshold (75%, 51% and 58%, respectively). The agreement between tests for macular problems was 75%. Participants and home healthcare nurses were generally satisfied with the eye-screening tool, although remarks for further improvements were made.

Conclusions

The eye-screening tool is promising for nurse-assisted eye screening in older adults receiving home healthcare, with the mostly satisfactory agreement. After implementing the eye-screening tool in practice, cost-effectiveness needs to be investigated.     

Evaluation of methods for assessing visual function of infants.

PURPOSE: Commonly used behavioral and electrical testing methods for estimation of visual acuity and visual function in infants yield different estimates and may not accurately predict visual acuity and visual function in later life. Moreover, neither test-retest variability nor side-by-side comparisons of the various methods have been thoroughly evaluated in the same infant population. The purpose of this study was to provide such an evaluation. METHOD: The test-retest variability of visual acuity and visual function was evaluated for the Teller Acuity Card (TAC) procedure, sweep visual evoked potential (VEP), as well as latency and amplitude measured by transient pattern VEP. Groups of approximately 20 infants contributed test-retest data. Visual function estimated by the various methods in a larger group of infants (n = 118) was compared. Correlations between methods and the validity of the various methods to detect maturational changes between 4 and 8 months of age were also assessed. Administration of these tests was according to standard and usual procedures. RESULTS: The average percent difference between test and retest estimates of acuity as well as the SD was lowest for transient VEP latency (3%, 7% SD). The other methods were markedly more variable: sweep VEP (2%, 22% SD), TAC procedure (8%, 20% SD), and transient VEP amplitude (7.5%, 39% SD). Average coefficients of variation showed a similar trend: transient VEP latency, 8%; sweep VEP, 15%; TACs, 30%; and transient amplitude, 53%. Correlations among estimates by the methods were poor, but expected changes in visual maturation from 4 to 8 months of age were detected with all methods. CONCLUSIONS: All methods evaluated provide valid and reliable test-retest data for a group, but are less valid for estimating visual acuity and visual function of an individual subject. The poor correlations between any 2 of the testing methods suggest that each test assesses a different aspect of vision. Nonetheless, expected maturational changes between 4 and 8 months of age were readily detectable by all methods evaluated.