Chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or relapsed germ-cell tumours

The optimal treatment in patients with poor prognosis germ-cell tumours (GCT), according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification, and in patients with refractory or relapsed disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy is controversial. As the majority of patients will suffer systemic relapses, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, the question of whether or not to use conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in these patients arises. Prognostic factors have recently been recognised to aid in this decision. However, reliable data on chemotherapy as primary treatment in poor prognosis patients and as the first-salvage attempt in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT are lacking. This report reviews the recent developments in first-line and salvage HDCT strategies and discusses the role of predictive factors for treatment outcome.     

Compliance with guidelines and correlation with outcome in patients with advanced germ-cell tumours

PurposeTo evaluate prior compliance with guidelines in patients treated with salvage chemotherapy for advanced germ-cell tumours (GCT).Patients and methodsData concerning the initial management of patients requiring salvage chemotherapy for GCT at Institut Gustave Roussy between 2000 and 2010 were obtained and correlated with recommendations for treatment. Criteria of non-compliance were defined based on guidelines. Compliance with guidelines, predictive factors for non-compliance and the impact on outcome were analysed.ResultsAmong 82 patients treated in the salvage setting, guidelines to initial treatment were followed in only 41 cases (50%). The most common non-compliance criteria were non-adherence to the planned dose (16%), an inappropriate interval between first-line chemotherapy cycles (16%), the lack of post-chemotherapy surgery (16%) and a long interval to post-chemotherapy surgery (48%). Compliance with standard care was better in cancer centres than in other hospitals (private or public) (Odd Ratio (OR): 6.9, P = 0.001). A poor-risk status according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) was also predictive of compliance in univariate but not in multivariate analysis. No significant difference in outcome after salvage chemotherapy was observed. Patients relapsing after non-compliant first-line therapy tended to be more easily salvaged, which is consistent with the fact that their initial treatment was inadequate. Some of these relapses were therefore probably not due to true biologically refractory disease.ConclusionGuidelines for first-line treatment are adhered to in only half the patients requiring salvage chemotherapy. As the only predictive factor for non-compliance was the treating centre, centralisation of patients with GCT in well-trained hospitals should be recommended.     

Predicting the risk of bleomycin lung toxicity in patients with germ-cell tumours.

BACKGROUND: Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) has been known since the early clinical trials of bleomycin in the 1960s. Postulated risk factors include cumulative bleomycin dose, reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), raised creatinine, older age and supplemental oxygen exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our prospectively collected testicular cancer research database, we reviewed 835 patients treated at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (Sutton, UK) with bleomycin-containing regimens for germ-cell tumours between January 1982 and December 1999, to identify those with BPT. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (6.8%) patients had BPT, ranging from X-ray/CT (computed tomography) changes to dyspnoea. There were eight deaths (1% of patients treated) directly attributed to BPT. The median time from the start of bleomycin administration to documented lung toxicity was 4.2 months (range 1.2-8.2). On multivariate analysis, the factors independently predicting for increased risk of BPT were GFR <80 ml/min [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3], age >40 years (HR 2.3), stage IV disease at presentation (HR 2.6) and cumulative dose of bleomycin >300,000 IU (HR 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with poor renal function are at high risk of BPT, especially if they are aged >40 years, have stage IV disease at presentation or receive >300,000 IU of bleomycin. In such cases alternative drug regimens or dose restriction should be considered.     

Testicular germ-cell tumours in a broader perspective

The germ-cell tumours are a fascinating group of neoplasms because of their unusual biology and the spectacular therapeutic results that have been obtained in these tumours. Traditionally, this group of neoplasms is presented in an organ-oriented approach. However, recent clinical and experimental data convincingly demonstrate that these neoplasms are one disease with separate entities that can manifest themselves in different anatomical sites. We propose five entities, in which the developmental potential is determined by the maturation stage and imprinting status of the originating germ cell. Recent progress begins to explain the apparent unpredictable development of germ-cell tumours and offers a basis for understanding their exquisite sensitivity to therapy.     

Genetic predisposition to testicular germ-cell tumours

Testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCT) are the most common neoplasm in young men. Various studies have suggested the existence of an inherited predisposition to development of these tumours. Genome-wide screens subsequently provided evidence of a TGCT susceptibility gene on chromosome Xq27 (TGCT1) that might also predispose to cryptorchism. However, this putative gene has yet to be identified, and other TGCT susceptibility genes probably exist. Completion of the human gene map and advances in genetic research will facilitate further investigation of genetic predisposition to TGCT. Insight into inheritance of TGCT might lead to the identification of individuals at increased risk of developing the disorder, increase our understanding of the mutation pathways that lead to sporadic cases, and contribute to improvement in diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians should record the family history of cancer and urogenital differentiation defects in patients with TGCT.     

Salvage high-dose chemotherapy for children with extragonadal germ-cell tumours

We reviewed the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) experience with salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) in paediatric patients with extragonadal germ-cell tumour (GCT). A total of 23 children with extragonadal GCT, median age 12 years (range 1-20), were treated with salvage HDC with haematopoietic progenitor cell support. The GCT primary location was intracranial site in nine cases, sacrococcyx in eight, retroperitoneum in four, and mediastinum in two. In all, 22 patients had a nongerminomatous GCT and one germinoma. Nine patients received HDC in first- and 14 in second- or third-relapse situation. No toxic deaths occurred. Overall, 16 of 23 patients (70%) achieved a complete remission. With a median follow-up of 66 months (range 31-173 months), 10 (43%) are continuously disease-free. Of six patients who had a disease recurrence after HDC, one achieved a disease-free status with surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In total, 11 patients (48%) are currently disease-free. Eight of 14 patients (57%) with extracranial primary and three of nine patients (33%) with intracranial primary GCT are currently disease-free. HDC induced impressive long-term remissions as salvage treatment in children with extragonadal extracranial GCTs. Salvage HDC should be investigated in prospective trials in these patients.     

The management of non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours patients with viable malignancy at the time of RPLND

What should I do if my first-line chemotherapy has not irradicatedall active germ-cell tumour (GCT)? This is the clinical conundrumaddressed by Fizazi et al. [1] in this issue of Annals of Oncology,an area of controversy but not a lot of light. Standard therapy for patients with metastatic non-seminomatousgerm-cell tumours remains the use of combination cisplatin-basedchemotherapy with the current standard of care being three orfour cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapydepending on the prognostic category [2–4]. The majorityof patients are cured by such therapy with long-term survivalexpected in >90% [3–5] except for the minority withpoor prognosis disease. Approximately, a third of these patients,however, will be left with residual masses over 1–2 cmfor which surgery is advised     

Role of metallothionein in cisplatin sensitivity of germ-cell tumours

Cisplatin (CDDP) is an extremely active drug in the treatment of germ-cell tumours. Earlier, we found an unexpected inverse correlation between the total amount of sulfhydryl groups and CDDP sensitivity in a panel of 3 human germ-cell-tumour and 3 colon-carcinoma cell lines. Major components of the sulfhydryl groups are glutathione and metallothionein (MT). We further investigated a possible role of MT in the CDDP sensitivity of germ-cell tumours. MT levels and functionality of the germ-cell-tumour and colon-carcinoma cell lines were found to be inversely correlated with CDDP sensitivity. No difference in sub-cellular localization of MT could be observed among the types of cell lines. In agreement with the in vitro data, immunohistochemical detection of MT was high in 11/14 primary human germ-cell tumours and low in 7/7 human colon carcinomas. MT-protein expression in primary germ-cell tumours did not discriminate between responding and non-responding patients. As compared with the primary tumours, MT-protein expression decreased in 5/7 post-chemotherapy residual vital tumours or remained undetectable (2/7). MT-protein expression in the germ-cell tumours was not related to total p53-protein expression. In summary, over-expression of MT was found in germ-cell tumours, both in cell lines and in human tumours. Although MT-protein over-expression seems to be associated with the CDDP sensitivity of germ-cell tumours, MT-protein expression in primary germ-cell tumours did not differ between responding and non-responding patients and therefore cannot be used to predict response to chemotherapy.     

Methotrexate for relapse of metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours

Twelve patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who relapsed after 3-9 courses (median 7) of cis-platin containing combination chemotherapy, were treated with moderately high-dose methotrexate (1 g m-2) and folinic acid rescue. There was one partial response and the remaining eleven patients showed progression of disease. The patient that responded was one of two patients treated at the time of first relapse. It is concluded that methotrexate does not have a useful role in the salvage treatment of germ-cell tumours relapsing after cis-platin-containing chemotherapy or in patients who are primarily resistant to cis-platin-containing regimes.     

Testicular carcinoma in situ in patients with extragonadal germ-cell tumours: the clinical role of pretreatment biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of testicular carcinoma in situ (CIS) in patients with a malignant extragonadal germ-cell tumour (EGGCT) and the incidence of metachronous invasive testicular cancer (TC) in relation to the pretreatment demonstration of CIS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with EGGCT (53 retroperitoneal, 15 mediastinal) had pre-chemotherapy histological assessment of one (13) or both (55) testicle(s). A total of 123 testicles were examined for the presence of CIS. RESULTS: Testicular CIS was found in 21 patients (31%) (18 retroperitoneal EGGCT, three mediastinal EGGCT). Two patients had bilateral CIS. Five patients, four of them with proven pretreatment CIS, developed a metachronous TC. The 10-year invasive-free TC survival rate for all 68 patients was 88%, but only 65% for those with proven pretreatment CIS. The overall 10-year survival rate for all patients was 82%. CIS was demonstrated in seven of 48 trans-scrotal core biopsies, in 10 of 56 trans-scrotal surgical biopsies and in five of 11 orchiectomy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with EGGCT present with testicular CIS, predominantly those with a retroperitoneal tumour. These patients have a considerable risk of metachronous TC development in spite of chemotherapy. The pretreatment demonstration of testicular CIS in patients with EGGCT gives the possibility of individualised counselling and safe follow-up, and is therefore highly recommended. The data are in agreement with a multi-site development of malignant germ-cell tumours, but do not exclude the possibility that the retroperitoneal EGGCTs in particular represent metastases from a burned-out TC.     

The management of poor-prognosis, non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours

Despite a high cure rate in men with testicular cancer, some men in the poor-prognosis group have a less favourable outcome. Poor-prognosis non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT) are defined as those with high tumour markers, non-pulmonary visceral metastases or a mediastinal primary site at presentation. When treated with standard chemotherapy regimens, such as bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP), cure rates of less than 50% have been achieved in an international pooled analysis. Some strategies aimed at improving results include the use of multi-agent regimens (e.g. POMB/ACE), intensive-induction chemotherapy (e.g. CBOP/BEP), new chemotherapy drugs, such as ifosfamide, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, high-dose chemotherapy, including autotransplantation. To date, no schedule has been proven to be better than standard BEP in randomised trials. We will review the published data relating to first-line and salvage treatment of poor-prognosis NSGCT. To advance the management of this disease, physicians treating poor-prognosis disease are urged to support multi-centre trials, such as the recently launched MRC TE23 study comparing BEP and CBOP/BEP.     

A phase II study using a topoisomerase I-based approach in patients with multiply relapsed germ-cell tumours.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours (GCTs), who relapse more than once or relapse with a mediastinal primary is poor. We have shown that topoisomerase 1 may be an attractive target in relapsed GCT. We investigated the role of irinotecan, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin (IPO) followed by topotecan-based high-dose therapy in responding patients, in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with multiply relapsed gonadal and mediastinal GCT were recruited to this phase 2 study. All patients received IPO chemotherapy and 12 (43%) went on to receive high-dose therapy. The outcome of these patients was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a median progression-free follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: Twenty patients (71%) responded to the therapy including five complete remissions (18%), 13 (46%) marker-negative partial responses and two (7%) marker-positive partial responses. Nine (32%) patients continue to be progression free, and the median survival for the whole group currently measures 17 months. Out of 12 individuals who received subsequent high-dose therapy consolidation, seven (58%) remain progression free. The commonest grade III/IV toxicity was infection (68%) and there were no IPO-related toxic deaths; there was one death from high-dose therapy. CONCLUSION: Topoisomerase I-based IPO chemotherapy that lacks etoposide is very active in multiply relapsed GCT. This data merit further investigation.     

Low-dose induction chemotherapy with Baby-BOP in patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours does not compromise outcome: a single-centre experience

BackgroundIn some institutions advanced metastatic germ-cell tumour (GCT) is treated with low-dose induction chemotherapy in specific settings. There is a lack of published data supporting its use. The data presented here specifically address this issue for the first time.Patients and methodsTwenty patients with metastatic GCT treated were with low-dose induction chemotherapy [Baby-BOP (bBOP)] between 1998 and 2009. We report the toxicity and outcome and compare it with a control group.ResultsbBOP was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths and a lack of chemotherapy-related toxicity. It was associated with a significant fall in tumour markers (median HCG fell from 35 195 to 11 028 IU/l). The first subsequent cycle of standard chemotherapy was administered a median of 9.5 days after initial treatment and was not associated with excess toxicity. The 2-year overall survival of the poor-prognosis patients treated with bBOP was 79.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48% to 93%], which is not significantly different from the 2-year overall survival of 80% [95% CI 55% to 92%] of the poor-prognosis patients, who did not receive bBOP.ConclusionLow-dose induction chemotherapy can be given safely in selected individuals and does not adversely affect subsequent chemotherapy or outcome.     

The management and outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre between 1988 and 2002

AimsThe aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts.Materials and methodsPatients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed.Results and conclusionsThe proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.