GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to smoking-related bladder cancer: A case-control study

ObjectivesGlutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of enzymes involved in detoxification. Genes encoding for GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 proteins are polymorphic, which can result in complete or partial loss of enzyme activity. Previous studies have associated polymorphisms of GSTA1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 genes with a higher risk of bladder cancer, but this is still controversial. Potential role of GSTA1 polymorphism in susceptibility to bladder cancer in Whites is lacking. We examined association between GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 gene variants and bladder cancer risk and evaluated whether they were modified by smoking.Materials and methodsA hospital-based case-control study recruited 201 incidence cases and 122 age-matched controls. Deletion polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 was identified by polymerase chain reaction method. Single nucleotide polymorphism of GSTA1 and GSTP1 was identified by restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Uniconditional multivariate logistic regression was applied to model association between genetic polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk, as well as effect modification by smoking.ResultsNo significant difference was observed in the distributions of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1, and GSTP1 gene variants between patients and controls. None of the examined polymorphisms was significantly associated with bladder cancer risk independently. The results of gene–smoking interaction analyses indicated a significant combined effect of smoking and all common GST polymorphisms tested (P for trend = 0.001). However, the most significant effect on bladder cancer risk was observed in smokers carrying lower activity GSTA1-AB/BB and GSTM-null genotype (OR = 3.5, P < 0.05) compared with GSTA1-AA and GSTM1-active non-smokers. Overall, the risk observed did not significantly differ with respect to quantity of cigarettes smoked. However, heavy smokers with GSTM1-null genotype had 2 times higher risk of bladder cancer than GSTM1-null light smokers (OR = 4.8 vs. OR = 2.0) when GSTM1-active non-smokers served as reference group. Smokers carrying both GSTM1-null and GSTA1-AB + BB genotypes exhibited the highest risk of bladder cancer (OR = 2.00, P = 0.123).ConclusionsNull or low-activity genotypes of the GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 did not contribute independently towards the risk of bladder cancer in our patients. However, in association with smoking, both low activity GSTA1 and GSTM1-null genotype increase individual susceptibility to bladder cancer.     

Association of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 gene polymorphism with oxidative stress in diabetic and nondiabetic chronic kidney disease

Background and Objective: Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) belong to a family of ubiquitous and multifunctional enzymes that work as one of the endogenous antioxidants in our body. This study was designed to look into the association of GST polymorphism with oxidative stress in both diabetic and nondiabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Design and Methods: Three groups of patients (50 in each): diabetics without CKD (DM), diabetic CKD (DM-CKD), and nondiabetic CKD (NDM-CKD) and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Genotyping was done for GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Serum GST and malondialdehyde (MDA) as a marker of oxidative stress were measured spectrophotometrically. Results: Based on genotyping, subjects were categorized as GSTM1+/GSTT1+, GSTM1?/GSTT1+, GSTM1+/GSTT1?, and GSTM1?/GSTT1?. Serum GST levels were lower among subjects with deletion in one/both GST genes, whereas MDA levels were found to be correspondingly raised. A negative correlation for MDA versus GST levels was observed among genotypes with one/both gene deletions. Presence of GSTM1+/GSTT1? and GSTM1?/GSTT1? was significantly higher among patients with CKD in both diabetics and nondiabetics. Interpretations and Conclusions: GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions singly or together were associated with lower GST levels and higher oxidative stress in both diabetic and nondiabetic CKD. Interestingly, GSTT1 deletion appears to be associated with both diabetic and nondiabetic CKD irrespective of the GSTM1 status.     

Relationship between GSTs Gene Polymorphism and Susceptibility to End Stage Renal Disease among North Indians

Background and Objective. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) is the superfamily of genes that provides protection to the cells against reactive oxygen species and plays a vital role in phase II of biotransformation of many substances. Overexpression of GST (EC 2.5.1.18) has been documented in the erythrocytes of patients with chronic renal failure, which may be of clinical relevance. Keeping this background in mind, we have investigated the relationship between human GST gene polymorphism in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Design and Methods. We have assessed 184 patients with ESRD and 569 age-and sex-matched controls from North India. The GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). GSTP1–313 A/G mutation was determined by PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion. Results. The gene frequency of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphism were evaluated. We observed that GSTM1 null genotype was present in 46.74% of the ESRD patients while GSTT1 null genotype was present in 58.7% of the ESRD subjects. The genotypic distribution of GSTP1 was Ile₁₀₅/Ile₁₀₅ in 47.3%, Ile₁₀₅/Val₁₀₅ in 30.97% and Val₁₀₅/Val₁₀₅ in 21.74% of ESRD patients. There was a significant association of null alleles of the GSTM1 (p = 0.0386; OR = 1.445, 95% CI = 1.033–2.021) and GSTT1 (p ≤ 0.0001; OR = 4.568, 95% CI = 3.215–6.492) and in the -313 G alleles (Val) of the GSTP1 gene (p = 0.0032; OR = 1.956, 95% CI = 1.265–3.024) with end stage renal disease. The combined analysis of the three genotypes showed a further increased risk to ESRD (p ≤ 0.0001; OR = 9.01, 95% CI = 5.55–14.626). Interpretations and Conclusions. The null / low polymorphism of the detoxifying enzymes GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 are associated with the risk of developing ESRD in North Indian patients.     

Chemerin rs17173608 and vaspin rs2236242 gene variants on the risk of end stage renal disease (ESRD) and correlation with plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) level

Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with critical kidney illness that seriously affects the lifespan. Genetic factors and oxidative stress could play critical role in the development of ESRD. We assessed the association between chemerin rs17173608 T/G and vaspin rs2236242 T/A genes variants with the risk of ESRD and their correlation with plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) level.

Materials and methods: In a case-control study, 131 gender and age-matched unrelated healthy controls and 110 ESRD patients were enrolled. The chemerin rs17173608 T/G and vaspin rs2236242 T/A were detected by Tetra primer-amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (T-ARMS-PCR). The MDA concentration was determined by HPLC.

Results: Our findings for the first time revealed that in codominant genetic model (T/G vs. T/T genotype), the T/G genotype of chemerin gene significantly had a protective role against ESRD susceptibility. Also, in the presence of chemerin G allele, the risk of ESRD decreased by 0.79-fold (p?=?.048) in Kurdish population of Iran. The MDA serum levels in ESRD patients carrying the chemerin T/G?+?G/G genotype of rs17173608 T/G and also in carriers of A/A?+?T/A genotype of vaspin rs2236242 T/A were significantly higher compared to those in control subjects. The overall distribution of vaspin rs2236242 T/A genotypes and alleles comparing ESRD patients and healthy subjects were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: We found that the G allele of chemerin rs17173608 compared to T allele decreased the risk of ESRD, and there was a significant association between chemerin and vaspin variants with plasma MDA level in a sample of the Iranian population.     

Relationship between GSTs gene polymorphism and susceptibility to end stage renal disease among North Indians

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) is the superfamily of genes that provides protection to the cells against reactive oxygen species and plays a vital role in phase II of biotransformation of many substances. Overexpression of GST (EC 2.5.1.18) has been documented in the erythrocytes of patients with chronic renal failure, which may be of clinical relevance. Keeping this background in mind, we have investigated the relationship between human GST gene polymorphism in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: We have assessed 184 patients with ESRD and 569 age-and sex-matched controls from North India. The GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). GSTP1-313 A/G mutation was determined by PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion. RESULTS: The gene frequency of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphism were evaluated. We observed that GSTM1 null genotype was present in 46.74% of the ESRD patients while GSTT1 null genotype was present in 58.7% of the ESRD subjects. The genotypic distribution of GSTP1 was Ile(105)/Ile(105) in 47.3%, Ile(105)/Val(105) in 30.97% and Val(105)/Val(105) in 21.74% of ESRD patients. There was a significant association of null alleles of the GSTM1 (p = 0.0386; OR = 1.445, 95% CI = 1.033-2.021) and GSTT1 (p < or = 0.0001; OR = 4.568, 95% CI = 3.215-6.492) and in the -313 G alleles (Val) of the GSTP1 gene (p = 0.0032; OR = 1.956, 95% CI = 1.265-3.024) with end stage renal disease. The combined analysis of the three genotypes showed a further increased risk to ESRD (p < or = 0.0001; OR = 9.01, 95% CI = 5.55-14.626). Interpretations and CONCLUSIONS: The null / low polymorphism of the detoxifying enzymes GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 are associated with the risk of developing ESRD in North Indian patients.     

Oxidative stress markers in seminal plasma of idiopathic infertile men may be associated with glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null genotypes

This study aimed to investigate the association between glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and T1 null genotypes and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and nitric oxide (NO) levels in male infertility. For this purpose, semen samples were collected from fertile and infertile subjects, and then they were genotyped for GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes using multiplex-PCR. The TBARS, TAC and NO levels in seminal plasma were then measured via the ferric-reducing ability of plasma (FRAP). A significant association was observed between GSTT1 null genotype and oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia. But, the GSTM1 null genotype was merely associated with teratozoospermia. Moreover, the GSTT1−/GSTM1+ combined genotype was associated with all subgroups of male infertility. Besides, an association was observed between GSTT1−/GSTM1− genotype and asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia. Further analysis showed that the GSTT1 null genotype was associated with increased NO in asthenozoospermia. Also, the GSTT1 null genotype was associated with increased TBARS in oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. As well, GSTM1 null genotype was associated with decreased TAC and increased NO in asthenozoospermia respectively. As a preliminary conclusion, the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes could be considered as genetic risk factors for male infertility, interfering with some oxidative stress markers in infertile men.     

Genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) and susceptibility to prostate cancer in Northern India

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) gene polymorphisms in patients with sporadic prostate cancer, in a North Indian population, as GSTs are active in detoxifying a wide variety of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens, and genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 have been assessed to evaluate the relative risk of various cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 127 patients with prostate cancer and 144 age-matched controls, all from North India. The GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes were identified by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in peripheral blood DNA samples, and GSTP1-313 A/G polymorphism was determined by PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: There was a significant association in null alleles of the GSTM1 (odds ratio 2.239, 95% confidence interval 1.37-3.65, P = 0.001) and GSTT1 (1.891, 1.089-3.282, P = 0.026) with prostate cancer risk, and in the -313 G alleles (Val) of the GSTP1 gene (2.48, 1.51-4.08, P < 0.001). The combined analysis of these three genotypes showed a further increase in the risks of prostate cancer (7.23, 2.42-22.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The GSTP1-313 G polymorphism, and null alleles of GSTM1 and GSTT1, are strong predisposing risk factors for sporadic prostate cancer in North India.     

GSTT1, GSTM1, and CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to sporadic renal cell cancer

PurposeTo estimate the prevalence and importance of GSTT1, GSTM1, and CYP1B1 genotypes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to identify their value as a prognostic factor.Materials and methodsCross-sectional study of a group of patients diagnosed with RCC (n = 133) and a control group (n = 208) with benign conditions and no history of tumor. Controls were selected by cumulative samples and mixed pairing. All subjects pertained to the catchment area for our hospital. Sociodemographic variables, anatomical pathology features, and presence of GSTT1, GSTM1, and CYP1B1 polymorphisms by multiplex PCR and sequencing techniques.ResultsThere were no differences in the genotype distribution of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes between cases and controls. In the case of CYP1B1, the GG genotype (Ala119) was more prevalent in patients with RCC (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32–2.28) and may be implicated in 34.3% (95% CI: 16.3–52.2) of RCCs. In patients with GSTT1 deletion, TNM stages III to IV were more common (39.1%); whereas in Val432 homozygous patients in CYP1B1, Fuhrman grades 3 to 4 (54.6%) were more common. Because this was a cross-sectional study, longitudinal studies are needed in the future to confirm these data.ConclusionsNo relationship between GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes and RCC risk was observed. Homozygous subjects with Ala119 in CYP1B1 had twice the risk of RCC as homozygous for Ser119 or heterozygotes. Patients with GSTT1 deletion had tumors of more advanced stages, and those with Val432 polymorphism in CYP1B1 had tumors of higher Fuhrman grade.     

Do glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms influence response to intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome?

The response to cyclophosphamide (CP) is variable and difficult to predict in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). The polymorphic expression of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) may affect the remission rate after CP therapy. In this study, we evaluated the correlation of GST polymorphism and response to CP in INS. We studied GST polymorphism in 74 children with steroid-sensitive (44) and steroid-resistant (30) INS receiving intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) therapy. We correlated GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes with response to IVCP. Thirty-seven (50%) out of 74 children responded to CP therapy. A synergistic effect of three genotypic combinations showed significant correlation with remission in the steroid-sensitive group. These combinations were GSTP1 and GSTM1 null genotype (p = 0.013) and GSTP1 together with GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes (p = 0.026). Further, a significant difference was observed with a combination of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and Val105 polymorphism. No association was observed among steroid-resistant patients. Our results indicate that among children with steroid-sensitive NS, there is an association with response to IVCP therapy and combination of GSTP1 Val105 polymorphism and the null genotypes of GSTT1 and GSTM1. GST polymorphism may be of significance in the management of children with INS receiving CP therapy.     

Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1, and the assessment of oxidative damage in infertile men with varicoceles from northwestern China

Our objective was to investigate the genetic polymorphisms of the glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1) and to assess the oxidative damage in infertile men with varicoceles from northwestern China. A total of 65 infertile men with varicoceles and 30 controls were included in the study. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses were used to identify the genotypes. Sperm DNA damage was assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL). The levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. The activities of malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO), and the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were detected by spectroscopic analysis, and sperm characteristics were measured using computer-assisted semen analysis. The frequencies of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genotypes were not significantly different between the control and patient groups (P > .05). The percentage of TUNEL-positive sperm and the levels of 8-OH-dG, MDA, and NO were higher but the sperm concentration and motility and the TAC were lower in the patients with the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTM1/T1 null genotypes than those in the patients with the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTM1/T1 present genotypes (P < .05). However, no significant differences were observed between the GSTP1 A/A and A/G+G/G genotypes (P > .05). Our results suggest that the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes may predispose sperm to increased oxidative damage in infertile men with varicoceles; however, GSTP1 allelic variation was not significantly different between the patient and control groups in this study.     

Polymorphisms in the glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 genes and prostate cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes can increase oxidative stress, which may affect cancer prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine associations between GSTM1, T1, or P1 genetic variants and prostate cancer outcomes. METHODS: A population-based cohort of men (n = 752) from King County, Washington, diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1993-1996, and under long-term surveillance for mortality completed a follow-up survey about prostate cancer recurrence/progression. Cox PH models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for deaths from prostate cancer or other causes and prostate cancer recurrence/progression. RESULTS: There were 50 prostate cancer-specific deaths, 65 deaths from other causes, and 143 recurrence/progressions events during an average 9.6 years of follow-up. The adjusted HR for prostate cancer mortality was 3.8 (95% CI 1.6-8.9) among Caucasian men with the GSTM1-null genotype. There were no differences, however, in mortality from other causes or prostate cancer recurrence/progression between men with GSTM1-null versus not-null genotypes. The GSTT1 and GSTP1 genotypes were not associated with any of these outcomes. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that the GSTM1 genotype may be a useful biomarker to identify patients at higher risk for fatal prostate cancer.     

Metabolic susceptibility genes and prostate cancer risk in a southern European population: the role of glutathione S-transferases GSTM1, GSTM3, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms

BACKGROUND: Glutathione S-transferase (GST) metabolic enzymes may be involved in the development of human cancer. Genetic polymorphisms have been reported in GSTM1, GSTM3, and GSTT1 with functional alterations and influencing cancer risk. METHODS: We analyzed DNA samples from 335 (670 alleles) unrelated individuals, 185 community control subjects, and 150 prostate cancer (PC) patients, for GSTM1, GSTM3, and GSTT1 genotypes using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: The analysis of the frequencies from the 670 alleles indicates that men carrying two B-alleles (GSTM3) have increased risk for PC (OR = 5.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-25.8; P = 0.016). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed this association (OR = 5.2, 95% CI 1.1-25.0; P = 0.036). No increased PC risk was observed for men carrying any of the GSTM1 or GSTT1 genotypes (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.75-1.90; P = 0.420 for GSTM1 null and OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.50-1.51; P = 0.550 for GSTM1 null). However, GSTT1 null was overrepresented in men with advanced PC disease (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that polymorphism in the GSTM3 may be an important biomarker for PC risk, especially in the definition of the genetic risk profile of populations of southern Europe.     

GSTP1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms in patients with cryptogenic liver cirrhosis

We investigated glutathione S-transferase (GST) P1I le (105) Val, T1, and M1 polymorphisms in 45 patients with documented cryptogenic cirrhosis and 56 healthy control subjects. Polymerase chain reaction-based procedures were performed in the studied populations to confirm the genotypes of GSTT1, M1, and P1. Ile/Val and Val/Val GSTP1 genotypes were more frequent in the patients with cirrhosis (n = 39, 87%) than in the control subjects (n = 10; 18%) (odds ratio [OR] 34.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.70 to 108.31, P < 0.001). Among these patients with cirrhosis, 16 were heterozygous and 23 were homozygous, whereas only one person in the control group was homozygous. The GSTM1 null genotype was also more prevalent in cirrhotic patients than in healthy control subjects (OR 6.83, 95% CI 2.53 to 18.42, P < 0.001). The rate of GSTT1 deletion did not show a significant difference between the two groups (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.76 to 7.28, P = 0.111). To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that GSTP1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms may be related to the development of cirrhosis by unknown mechanisms. The significant association of cryptogenic cirrhosis with Val/Val GSTP1 genotype encoding a low detoxification activity protein implicates this polymorphism as a risk factor for the occurrence of the disease. Presented as an abstract at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Orlando, Florida, May 19–22, 2003 (Poster of Distinction).     

Relationship between GSTM1/GSTT1 Null Genotypes and Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-Analysis

The results from the published studies on the relationship between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk are still conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes and RCC susceptibility. Association studies were identified from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) on 1 February 2012, and eligible investigations from 1950 to 2012 were synthesized using meta-analysis method. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. Six studies were identified for the analysis of association between polymorphic deletion of GSTM1/GSTT1 and RCC risk. There was no association between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype and RCC susceptibility (GSTM1: N = 6, p-heterogeneity = 0.07, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.85–1.35, p = 0.57; GSTT1: N = 6, p-heterogeneity < 0.00001, OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.58–1.65, p = 0.94). Interestingly, null genotype of GSTT1 was associated with RCC risk in Caucasians and Asians (Caucasians: N = 4, p-heterogeneity = 0.38, OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61–0.95, p = 0.01; Asians: N = 1, OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.63–3.51, p < 0.00001). For the GSTM1–GSTT1 interaction analysis, the dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was not significantly associated with RCC susceptibility (N = 4, p-heterogeneity = 0.006, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.98–1.39, p = 0.09). However, the dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 was associated with RCC risk in Asians (N = 1, OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.36–3.13, p = 0.007). In conclusion, our study results suggest that GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the RCC susceptibility in Caucasians and Asians, and the dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 is associated with RCC risk in Asians. However, more genetic epidemiological investigations are required to further explore this relationship.     

Impact of CYP1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 polymorphisms in overall and specific prostate cancer survival

ObjectivePrognostic biomarkers that distinguish between patients with good or poor outcome can be used to guide decisions of whom to treat and how aggressively. In this sense, several groups have proposed genetic polymorphisms as potential susceptibility and prognostic biomarkers; however, their validity has not been proven. Thus, the main goal of the present work was to investigate the potential role of single and combined CYP1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genotypes as modifiers of cancer survival in Chilean patients with prostate cancer.Methods and materialsA total of 260 histologically confirmed patients were recruited from a voluntary screening, and genomic DNA was obtained from their blood samples for genotyping analyses to detect the CYP1A1*2A polymorphism and GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions. The progression of illness and mortality were estimated with a median follow-up of 8.82 years. Adjusted estimated genotype risks were evaluated by hazard ratio and 95% CI using the Cox proportional model. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier survival method and log-rank test were used to evaluate patient survival with regard to genotype.ResultsThe 9-year overall and specific survival rates were 67.6% and 36.6% in the GSTT1null group, 67.6% and 58.7% in the GSTM1non-null group, 69.0% and 51.6% in the *1A/*2A group, 63.9% and 61.5% in the *2A/*2A group vs. 76.2% and 62.3% in the GSTT1non-null group, 82.3% and 50% in the GSTM1null group, and 83.7% and 56.3% in the *1A/*1A group, respectively. The hazard ratios and the Kaplan-Meier curve results demonstrate that the GSTM1non-null, GSTT1null, and CYP1A1*2A genotypes are significantly associated with mortality. Our study has two main limitations: a relatively small sample size and a low global mortality percentage (25.4%); thus, we need to continue the follow-up to confirm these findings.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the GSTM1non-null, GSTT1null, and CYP1A1*2A genotypes may be good prognosis markers, particularly in patients with high-risk tumors.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in middle-aged men

BACKGROUND: The glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzymes detoxify several carcinogens. Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, T1, and P1 (Ile105Val) have been associated with prostate cancer, however, results have been inconsistent across studies. METHODS: Data from a population-based case-control study in King County, Washington, were used to further evaluate the relationships between these GST polymorphisms and prostate cancer. Incident cases (n = 590) were 40-64 years old, diagnosed from 1993 through 1996, and identified via the SEER cancer registry. Controls (n = 538) were identified via random digit dialing, and frequency age-matched to cases. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Risk of prostate cancer was moderately increased among Caucasians with the GSTM1-null genotype (OR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.19-2.01). There were no associations for either GSTT1 or P1(Ile105Val). The association between the GSTM1-null genotype and prostate cancer was not different according to cancer aggressiveness defined by stage at diagnosis and Gleason score. Among GSTM1-null Caucasians, the relative risk of prostate cancer increased linearly with increasing pack-years of smoking (P-value for trend = 0.007), with the highest ORs observed for smokers of >30 pack-years. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the GSTM1-null genotype defines a subgroup of men at higher risk of prostate cancer, particularly if they are heavy smokers.     

The predictive value of GSTT1 polymorphisms in predicting the early response to induction BCG therapy in patients with non–muscle invasive bladder cancer

IntroductionWe evaluated the predictive value of glutathione S transferase mu (GSTM1) and theta (GSTT1) polymorphisms in early response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) induction therapy in patients with primary non–muscle invasive bladder cancer.MethodsGSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were analyzed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction using blood genomic DNA from 135 patients with primary non–muscle invasive bladder cancer who were being treated with a single induction course of BCG. BCG nonresponsiveness (early BCG failure) was defined as a tumor recurrence or progression within 12 months after BCG induction therapy. The predictive value of GST polymorphisms was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate logistic regression models.ResultsPatients carrying a GSTT1-positive genotype demonstrated a higher likelihood of early BCG failure regardless of cigarette smoking. After stratification based on the tumor stage and grade, the high-risk group (T1G3) with a GSTT1-positive genotype showed a 14-fold higher risk of early BCG failure compared with those with a GSTT1-null genotype. In a combined analysis of 2 genes, the GSTT1-positive/GSTM1-null genotype had a higher risk of BCG nonresponsiveness compared with the GSTT1-null/GSTM1-null genotype (odds ratio = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.54–11.26). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the GSTT1-positive genotype was an independent predictor of early BCG failure (odds ratio = 3.67, 95% CI: 1.61–8.38). Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed a significant difference in disease-free survival depending on the GSTT1 genotype (log rank test, P = 0.038).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that the GSTT1-positive genotype is an independent predictor of early BCG failure. These results can help determine whether patients would benefit from adjuvant BCG treatment or may require more aggressive alternative therapies.     

Role of glutathione s-transferase polymorphisms and chronic allograft dysfunction

Polymorphisms within genes encoding glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) may affect responses against damage induced by oxidative stress and therefore play a role to prevent chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). In the present study, we estimated the frequencies of GSTM1- and GSTT1-null genotypes among 227 renal transplant recipients seeking to establish an association with CAD. Patients persistently displaying serum creatinine (sCr) values < or = 1.5 mg/dL, measured creatinine clearances (CLcr) > or = 50 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and 24-hour proteinuria < or = 500 mg were classified as normal graft function (NF; n = 107). In contrast, the CAD group (n = 120) presented sCr > 1.5 mg/dL, CLcr < 50 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and proteinuria > 500 mg. The GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms were evaluated by the multiplex polymerase chain reaction. The frequencies of GSTT1-null genotypes in NF and CAD cohorts were 15% and 24.2%, respectively (P = .057), while GSTM1-null genotypes in the same groups of patients were 44% and 46.7% (P = .389). A combination of null genotypes for GSTT1 and GSTM1 was observed in 9.2% of patients with CAD and in 5.6% of those with NF (P = .449). This study did not show an association of either GSTT1- and GSTM1-null genotypes with CAD. It is likely that development and progression of CAD are determined by a combination of complex genetic traits resulting from the interplay of several genes rather than a single gene.     

An updating meta‐analysis of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer: A HuGE Review

It has been postulated that individuals with GSTM1, GSTT1 deficiency and, GSTP1 (105Ile/Val transition) have increased susceptibility to carcinogens and are more likely to develop prostate cancer. In recent years, GST status has been extensively studied as a prostate cancer risk factor; however, the results are inconsistent. To re‐examine this controversy, we have undertaken an updating meta‐analysis of 29 studies with GSTM1 genotyping (4,564 prostate cancer cases and 5,464 controls), 22 studies with GSTT1 genotyping (3,837 cases and 4,552 controls), and 24 studies with GSTP1 genotyping (5,301 cases and 5,621 controls). The random effects odds ratio was 1.33 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.15, 1.55; I² = 68.9%, P for heterogeneity = 0.00] for the GSTM1 null versus present genotype and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.27; I² = 68.2%, P for heterogeneity = 0.00) for the GSTT1 null versus present genotype, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.24; I² = 71.5%, P for heterogeneity = 0.00) for the GSTP1‐Val versus GSTP1‐Ile allele. For GSTM1 polymorphism, similar results reached in Caucasians and Asians, with exception for Africans. No association between GSTT1 or GSTP1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk was detected in different racial. In conclusion, the major finding of our study suggested that GSTM1 polymorphism conferred an increasing risk of prostate cancer on a wide population basis, however, no relationship was found between GSTT1 and GSTP1 status and the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate 69:662–688, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Association of genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, P1 and susceptibility to bladder cancer

OBJECTIVE: Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) are active in the detoxification of wide variety of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens. We examined the association of the GST gene polymorphism with sporadic bladder cancer patients in Northern India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study constituted of 106 bladder cancer cases and 370 age-matched controls. The GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes were identified by multiplex PCR and GSTP1313 A/G by Polymerase Chain Reaction/Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism method (PCR/RFLP). RESULTS: We observed non-significant association in null alleles of the GSTM1 (p = 0.611, OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.72-1.74 and GSTT1 (p = 0.135, OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.89-2.37) with risk of bladder cancer. However, the G/G genotype of the GSTP1 gene polymorphism was highly significant when compared to controls (p=0.000, OR = 7.12, 95% CI = 3.14-16.16). The combined analysis of the three risk genotypes demonstrated further increase in the risk of bladder cancer (p = 0.000, OR = 7.29 95% CI = 2.81-18.93). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that GSTP1313 G/G polymorphism is a strong predisposing risk factor for bladder cancer. Combination of three GST genotypes association exhibiting gene-gene interaction further substantiates the increased risk of bladder cancer.