Relative bioavailability of metaproterenol in humans utilizing a single dose, stable isotope approach

The relative bioavailability of metaproterenol (3,5-dihydroxy-alpha-[(isopropylamino)methyl]benzyl alcohol) following a single dose (10-mg metaproterenol sulfate tablet) was studied in six normal male volunteers using coadministration of a solution of a deuterated analogue (metaproterenol-d7 sulfate). The bioavailability of the tablet formulation relative to that of the oral solution was 92 +/- 9%, with excellent power at the 5% significance level. Comparison of the coadministration of the labeled and unlabeled metaproterenol sulfate solutions in two subjects after a one-week washout demonstrated the absence of an isotope effect on either absorption or elimination. A GC-MS assay for metaproterenol was developed to measure plasma concentrations resulting from oral administration. The assay was linear over the range of 0.5-8 ng/mL, corresponding to typical plasma metaproterenol concentrations obtained after a single 10-mg oral dose. Accuracy and precision data were obtained at metaproterenol concentrations of 1.0 and 2.0 ng/mL plasma to demonstrate the applicability of the assay for bioavailability studies. Following oral administration, metaproterenol showed peak plasma concentrations of 2.2 to 13 ng/mL at 0.75 to 3.0 h, with a terminal harmonic mean half-life of 2.1 h over the plasma concentration range studied. The renal clearance of 133-158 mL/min for metaproterenol slightly exceeds the glomerular filtration rate in humans.     

Isosorbide dinitrate plasma concentrations and bioavailability in human subjects after administration of standard oral and sublingual formulations

The bioavailability of isosorbide dinitrate from formulations containing 5, 10, and 20 mg in tablets and 10 mg in solution for oral use and 5 mg in tablets for sublingual use, has been compared. When adjusted for dose, the peak mean plasma drug concentrations after oral administration were similar (e.g., 9.2 ng/mL after a 10-mg tablet) and about one-half that obtained after sublingual administration. Drug concentrations declined monoexponentially with mean half-lives ranging from 25-36 min. The relative bioavailability of isosorbide dinitrate from the oral formulations was not significantly different (p greater than 0.05) over the dose range studied, whereas the relative bioavailability after sublingual administration was about twice as great (p less than 0.01) as that after oral administration. The plasma drug concentration-time profile after administering the 5-mg sublingual tablet was similar to that obtained after administering orally a solution containing 10 mg, indicating that the latter should be as clinically effective as the former.     

Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of domperidone in healthy volunteers

Domperidone is a potent gastrokinetic agent and antinauseant currently undergoing clinical trials in the United States. The bioequivalence of 20 mg of domperidone given as free-base tablets and maleate salt tablets, and the bioavailability of base and maleate tablets relative to a solution, were studied in 21 fasting men using a crossover design. Plasma samples collected for up to 48 hours were analyzed for domperidone levels, using a sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay (RIA). The absorption of domperidone was very rapid, with mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values of 18.8, 15.0, and 20.7 ng/mL attained at 0.9, 1.2, and 0.6 hours after the administration of base tablet, maleate tablet, and solution, respectively. The mean elimination half-life (t1/2) ranged from 12.6 to 16.0 hours. The mean oral clearance (CL/F) after the solution dose was 4,735 +/- 2,017 mL/min and the mean apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) was 6,272 +/- 5,100 L, indicating an extensive distribution of domperidone in the body. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) data demonstrated bioequivalence of base and maleate tablets. The relative bioavailability for base tablet and maleate tablet was 107 +/- 50% and 116 +/- 47%, respectively, of that of the solution. Dose proportionality of domperidone was also studied in 12 subjects at solution doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg. Linear correlations between the dose and Cmax and AUC values were observed. Mean CL/F remained relatively constant after doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg (5,255 +/- 3,159, 4,842 +/- 1,774, and 4,380 +/- 1,289 mL/min, respectively), indicating linear pharmacokinetics of domperidone over the dose range studied.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of dilevalol in normotensive volunteers

The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of dilevalol following oral and intravenous administration were investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Dilevalol HCl was administered as a 200-mg oral tablet and a 50-mg intravenous infusion using a randomized cross-over design. Blood and urine samples were collected over 60 hours and analyzed for unchanged and total (unchanged plus Glusulase-released) dilevalol using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. After intravenous administration, total body clearance and volume of distribution of unchanged dilevalol were determined to be 23.2 mL/min/kg and 24.6 L/kg, respectively. After oral administration, a mean maximum concentration of 62 ng/mL was reached at an average peak time of 1.4 hours. Drug was eliminated with a half-life of 8.3 hours after oral administration and 12 hours after intravenous administration. Based on plasma levels and urinary excretion of total dilevalol, the drug was completely absorbed; however, due to first-pass metabolism, the absolute bioavailability of unchanged drug was 11 to 14%.     

Relative bioavailability of a commercial trifluoperazine tablet formulation using a radioimmunoassay technique

The relative bioavailability of a new conventional tablet formulation (5 mg) of trifluoperazine dihydrochloride was studied in 24 healthy volunteers. Using a sensitive radioimmunoassay technique, plasma trifluoperazine concentrations were measured up until 24 h following ingestion of single 5-mg doses of trifluoperazine. The mean +/- SD for the peak concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, area under the curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC240), and terminal elimination half-life following the administration of the test formulation were 2.15 +/- 1.07 ng/mL, 4.10 +/- 1.38 h, 21.04 +/- 11.92 ng X h/mL, and 9.5 +/- 7 h, respectively. Following the ingestion of the original trifluoperazine tablet formulation (5 mg) these same parameters were estimated to be 1.92 +/- 0.88 ng/mL, 4.02 +/- 1.10 h, 18.03 +/- 10.11 ng X h/mL, and 9.3 +/- 7 h, respectively. Large intersubject variations in Cmax and AUC240 were observed. The relative bioavailability of the test formulation was calculated to be 106.5 +/- 25.5%.     

Pharmacokinetics of ritanserin in patients undergoing hemodialysis

The pharmacokinetics of ritanserin were studied in five patients with chronic renal insufficiency and who were undergoing periodic hemodialysis. Immediately after breakfast, a single 10-mg ritanserin tablet was administered to each patient on a day that they did not undergo dialysis. Plasma ritanserin levels were measured by a specific high-performance liquid chromatographic assay sensitive to 2 ng/mL plasma. After the oral 10-mg dose, the average time to reach the peak plasma concentration, Tmax, was 4.4 +/- 2.2 hours in these uremic patients, with a range of 2 to 8 hours. The average peak plasma concentration was 73.6 +/- 26.9 ng/mL (range: 54.6-120.0 ng/mL). Compared with a previous study in healthy volunteers, the uremic patients had a slower absorption profile, with a 39% reduction in peak plasma concentration and mean delay of 2.5 hours in Tmax. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve for ritanserin (2031 +/- 636 ng.hr/mL) was 47% lower compared with that in healthy volunteers (3867 +/- 1413 ng.hr/mL). The observed delayed and lower ritanserin absorption in these uremic patients may be caused by the chronic use of antacids such as aluminum hydroxide and calcium carbonate in all patients and/or by concurrent pathologic changes in the gastrointestinal mucosa of these patients. The regular hemodialysis sessions every 2-3 days did not affect the elimination rate of ritanserin, as the terminal half-life in these patients (39 +/- 23 hr) is similar to that in healthy volunteers (41 +/- 14 hr).     

Palatability and relative bioavailability of an extemporaneous carbamazepine oral suspension

The palatability of five flavored and unflavored extemporaneous carbamazepine 20-mg/mL oral suspensions was tested, and the bioavailability of the unflavored suspension relative to that of the tablet used in its manufacture was determined in a randomized, crossover study of 12 healthy volunteers. Carbamazepine 400 mg was administered with a glass of water as either 20 mL of unflavored oral suspension (20 mg/mL) or two 200-mg tablets. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive first either the tablets or the suspension in crossover fashion on two days separated by at least two weeks. Blood samples were taken just before and at various times up to 72 hours after the carbamazepine dose. Serum samples were assayed for carbamazepine content by high-performance liquid chromatography. Of five flavored and unflavored carbamazepine suspensions tested in eight volunteers, the cherry-mint formulation was the least palatable. There was no trend in preference among the remaining suspensions (banana, tutti-frutti, grape, and unflavored). Mean values of maximum serum concentration and absorption rate constant were significantly greater for the unflavored suspension (5.7 mg/L [24 mumol/L] and 0.832 hr-1, respectively) than for the tablet (4.9 mg/L [20.8 mumol/L] and 0.266 hr-1, respectively). The mean time to maximum concentration was significantly shorter after suspension administration (3.87 hours) than after tablet administration (11.8 hours). There was no significant difference in the extent of absorption of the tablet and suspension formulation as reflected by the corrected values of the area under the serum concentration-versus-time curves. The mean (+/- S.D.) bioavailability of the suspension relative to the tablet was 94.46% +/- 20.42 (range 76.35-132.72%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative bioavailability of a cisapride suppository and tablet formulation in healthy volunteers

Summary The comparative bioavailability of cisapride as a 30 mg suppository and three 5 mg oral tablets was investigated in 12 non-smoking, healthy male volunteers. The two formulations were administered on two separate occasions following an overnight fast, according to a randomized cross-over design. The plasma concentration of cisapride was measured over 48 h after drug administration. The 30 mg suppository exhibited a mean time to the peak plasma concentration of 3.8 h, while the tablets showed a significantly earlier peak time of 1.5 h. The maximum plasma concentration of cisapride after the 30 mg suppository (50.3 ng · ml^–1) was significantly lower than after the tablets (74.3 ng · ml^–1). The AUCs following the two treatments did not differ significantly from each other.The comparative bioavailability of the 30 mg cisapride suppository in relation to the three 5 mg oral tablets was 85%, with a 95%-confidence interval of 67% to 102% (not adjusted for dose). Normalizing the mean AUC by dose, the relative bioavailability of the suppository was 43% of that of the tablet. The elimination half-life of cisapride was not significantly different following the administration of the two formulations (9.3 h for the suppository and 9.8 h for the tablet).     

The site of gastrointestinal absorption of gepirone in humans.

This study was conducted in seven healthy male subjects and was performed over four sessions with a 1-week washout between sessions. It was designed to compare the bioavailability of an oral 20-mg gepirone dose (treatment 1) with that obtained after application of the same dose by gastric intubation to the distal (treatment 2) and proximal (treatment 3) regions of the small intestine, and after 4 consecutive 5-mg gepirone doses given orally at hourly intervals (treatment 4). Serial blood samples were taken over 24 hours after dose after each treatment. Plasma concentrations of gepirone and 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP), a metabolite of gepirone, were quantitated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mean gepirone time to reach peak concentration (tmax) after treatments 1, 2, and 3 ranged between 0.57 and 1.07 hours. There were no significant differences between sites and treatments for gepirone t1/2, which ranged between 2.8 and 3.3 hours. The mean gepirone maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher (P less than .05) after treatment 2 (12.92 +/- 7.24 ng/mL) compared with treatment 1 (6.79 +/- 3.54 ng/mL) or treatment 3 (6.33 +/- 2.26 ng/mL). Gepirone area under the curve (AUCinf) was also significantly higher (P less than .05) after treatment 2 (29.83 +/- 17.42 ng.h/mL) compared with treatment 1 (18.07 +/- 6.10 ng.h/mL) or treatment 3 (17.74 +/- 7.69 ng.h/mL). There were no significant differences in gepirone AUCinf between treatments 1 and 4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pharmacokinetic profile of rizatriptan 10-mg tablet and 10-mg orally disintegrating tablet administered with or without water in healthy subjects: an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-period crossover study

This open-label, 3-period crossover study compared the plasma concentration profiles of rizatriptan tablet, orally disintegrating tablet with water (ODTc), and ODT without water (ODTs) in 24 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. At each period, subjects received a single dose of either 10-mg rizatriptan tablet, 10-mg rizatriptan ODTs, or 10-mg rizatriptan ODTc. The authors hypothesized that ODTc has a greater geometric mean AUC(0-2h) than ODTs and that ODTc has a greater geometric mean AUC(0-1h) than tablet. A secondary end point was to compare the time of occurrence of the maximum rizatriptan plasma concentration (t(max)) of each dosing method. ODTc had a statistically significantly greater geometric mean AUC(0-2h) compared with ODTs (33.84 h x ng/mL vs 18.83 h x ng/mL; P < .001). ODTc had a slightly, but not statistically significantly, greater geometric mean AUC(0-1h) compared with rizatriptan tablet (17.07 h x ng/mL vs 13.32 h x ng/mL). The median t(max) was 0.67 hours for ODTc and tablet and 1.33 hours for ODTs. ODTc showed a slightly, but not significantly, faster rate of absorption compared with tablet. ODTs with water had a faster rate of absorption than ODTc. Future studies are needed to determine whether this pharmacokinetic difference produces differential efficacy in a clinical setting.     

Formulation dependent pharmacokinetics--does the dosage form matter for nifedipine?

This was an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study that compared in 25 healthy male subjects, the pharmacokinetics of a single 60-mg dose of nifedipine GITS tablet versus (1) 20-mg doses of nifedipine prolonged action tablets given q12h for a total of two doses and (2) 2 x 10 mg doses of nifedipine capsules given q8h for a total of three doses. Following capsule administration, there was a rapid rise in plasma concentration of drug achieving a peak concentration of 196(35) ng/mL (mean and coefficient of variation) within 0.7 (105) hours and an AUC(infinity) of 973(39) ng.hr/mL. After nifedipine PA there was also a rapid rise in plasma concentration of drug achieving a Cmax of 85.5 (36) ng/mL with a tmax of 1.7(58) hours and an AUC(infinity) of 879(46) ng.hr/mL. For the nifedipine GITS formulation, there was a lag in the plasma concentration time profile for approximately 2 to 3 hours, then it rose gradually achieving a Cmax of of 686(54) 30.5(63) ng/mL with a tmax of 15.0(50) hours and an AUC(infinity) ng.hr/mL. The AUC(infinity) and Cmax were significantly (P = 0.0001) greater in the capsule and PA formulations than for the GITS; however, the tmax for the GITS formulation was significantly (P = 0.001) longer than for the other formulations.This study suggests marked formulation-dependent pharmacokinetics, which may have important clinical implications.     

Pharmacokinetic investigation of a nicotine sublingual tablet

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a new 2-mg nicotine sublingual tablet under varying conditions of use. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of the 2-mg nicotine sublingual tablet were investigated in four separate studies involving healthy adult volunteer smokers: (1) a multiple-dose comparison with 2-mg nicotine chewing gum (n=24; 13 males, 11 females), (2) a dose-proportionality study comparing single doses of 2, 4 and 6 mg (n=21, 10 males, 11 females), (3) an evaluation of the effect of incorrect tablet use, i.e. chewing the tablet followed by either immediate or delayed swallowing (n = 19, 10 males, 9 females), and (4) the effect of oral and gastric pH on nicotine absorption from the tablet (n=20; 11 males, 9 females). Study parameters were maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). RESULTS: The plasma nicotine profiles were similar following repeated administration of the sublingual tablet and the 2-mg nicotine chewing gum (mean Cmax 13.2 versus 14.4 ng/ml, median tmax 20 versus 20 min, mean AUC11-12 12.4 versus 13.5 ng/ml per hour) with no statistically significant difference between the two treatments. The pharmacokinetics of the 4- and 6-mg doses were non-linear compared to the 2-mg dose, probably as a result of more of the dose being swallowed and undergoing first-pass metabolism in the liver. The mean Cmax for the 2-, 4- and 6-mg dose was 3.8 +/- 1.0, 6.8 +/- 2. 1, and 9.0 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, respectively, and in terms of dose proportionality the relative bioavailability of the 4- and 6-mg dose was 0.82 and 0.71, respectively. Incorrect tablet use, i.e. chewing the tablet and immediate swallowing decreased nicotine bioavailability both in terms of rate and extent. Mean Cmax was 12.1 ng/ml (correct use), 10.3 ng/ml (chewing and immediate swallowing), and 12.1 ng/ml (chewing and delayed swallowing). Corresponding mean values for AUC9-10 were 11.6, 9.6 and 11.2 ng/ml per hour. There were no significant differences between 'alkaline mouth' versus control, 'acidic mouth' versus control or 'alkaline stomach' versus control, but the rate of nicotine absorption was increased at alkaline compared to acidic oral pH (mean Cmax 6.1 versus 4.9 ng/l ml, P = 0.003; median tmax 60 versus 90 min, P= 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of the nicotine 2-mg tablet was similar to that of the 2-mg nicotine chewing gum. Absorption of nicotine from the tablet was nonlinear at higher doses (two or three tablets). Chewing the tablet and keeping the remains in the mouth or concurrent use of acidic beverages or antacids are equivalent to recommended sublingual use during normal oral pH conditions.     

Pharmacokinetics of bumetanide following intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administrations to normal subjects

The pharmacokinetics of bumetanide was studied in 12 normal subjects after 1-mg intravenous, intramuscular, oral solution, and tablet administrations in a random four-treatment crossover design. Plasma and urine concentrations of intact bumetanide were analyzed by a sensitive and specific RIA. The pharmacokinetics of bumetanide after intravenous administration was characterized by a biexponential equation, including an initial disposition phase (t 1/2, alpha = 5.1 min), followed by a slower elimination phase (t 1/2, beta = 44 min). Bumetanide pharmacokinetics after intramuscular and oral administration could be described by a biexponential equation with first-order absorption and elimination. Bumetanide is rapidly absorbed via the intramuscular and oral routes, with mean +/- SD maximum plasma concentrations of 38.2 +/- 9.8 (intramuscular), 34.0 +/- 10.6 (oral solution), and 30.9 +/- 14.6 ng/mL (tablet) achieved within 0.34 +/- 0.23, 0.76 +/- 0.27, and 1.8 +/- 1.2 h after dosing, respectively. The drug is rapidly eliminated from the body after intravenous, intramuscular, oral solution, and oral tablet administrations, with half-lives ranging from 24-86, 47-139, 27-71, and 26-99 min, respectively. Approximately 70% of a parenteral dose and 60% of an oral dose are excreted as intact drug in urine taken 0-24 h after administration. The extent of bioavailability of bumetanide from the tablet and oral solution dosage forms are equivalent, and the absolute bioavailability of the intramuscular and oral preparations are approximately 100 and 80%, respectively. This is consistent with the predicted limited extent of first-pass metabolism after complete absorption of an oral dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relative bioavailability of three cefixime formulations

Three galenic formulations of cefixime (tablet, syrup and dry suspension) containing 200 mg each were compared with respect to their relative bioavailability in twelve healthy volunteers. All three formulations showed reliable absorption. Mean peak plasma concentrations were reached after 3.3-3.5 h, mean terminal half lives were 2.9-3.1 h. 18-24% of the dose administered were recovered unchanged in the urine. Best bioavailability was obtained with the dry suspension (AUC0-infinity = 25.8 +/- 7.0 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 3.4 +/- 0.9 microgram/ml), followed by the tablet (AUC0-infinity = 20.9 +/- 8.1 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 3.0 +/- 1.0 micrograms/ml) and the syrup which is based on triglycerides (AUC0-infinity = 17.8 +/- 5.9 micrograms/ml h; Cmax = 2.4 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml). The statistical analysis resulted in bioinequivalence between dry suspension and syrup. It is concluded that best bioavailability of cefixime after oral administration is guaranteed when taken in an "aqueous medium" either as dry suspension or as tablet with "plenty of liquid".     

The disposition and bioavailability of intravenous and oral nalbuphine in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral nalbuphine were studied in 24 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 21 to 30 years. On separate test days over a five-week period, subjects received single doses of each of four different formulations of nalbuphine, with a one-week washout period between treatments: 10 mg intravenously administered over two minutes, 45 mg orally given as a solution, and 45 mg orally administered in two tablet formulations (formulation A and formulation B). Blood samples were collected over 48 hours postadministration, and plasma nalbuphine concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. The mean nalbuphine plasma concentration five minutes after 10 mg intravenously was 53 ng/mL, and the half-life of nalbuphine with this route of administration was 2.3 hours. In contrast, mean maximum nalbuphine concentrations (Cmax) after the three orally administered preparations ranged from 14.4 to 15.5 ng/mL, and occurred 0.9 to 1.2 hours after dose administration. Mean elimination half-lives after administration of the three nalbuphine oral formulations were essentially identical, ranging from 6.9 to 7.7 hours. Nalbuphine plasma concentration curves decayed biexponentially regardless of route of administration or type of formulation. Absolute bioavailability of the orally administered forms of nalbuphine ranged from 16.4 to 17.4% and Cmax and AUC data further established the bioequivalence of the three oral formulations. The low absolute bioavailability and prolonged elimination half-life of nalbuphine associated with oral administration are likely due to extensive first-pass metabolism and enterohepatic circulation, respectively.     

Studies of mefloquine bioavailability and kinetics using a stable isotope technique: a comparison of Thai patients with falciparum malaria and healthy Caucasian volunteers.

1 A mefloquine hydrochloride tablet (250 mg base equivalent to 4.8 +/- 0.6 mg kg-1; mean +/- s.d.) and deuterium labelled mefloquine hydrochloride solution (250 mg base) were given to six adult male Thai patients with acute falciparum malaria and six healthy Swiss adult male volunteers (equivalent to 3.5 +/- 0.1 mg kg-1). 2 The relative bioavailability of the tablet formulation derived from comparison of the areas under the plasma concentration-time curves was similar in both groups; 87 +/- 11% and 89 +/- 10% (mean +/- s.d.). 3 The rate of drug absorption appeared to be similar in the two groups but peak plasma mefloquine concentrations were approximately three times higher in the Thai patients (1004 +/- 276 ng ml-1 for the tablet and 1085 +/- 280 ng ml-1 for the suspension) compared with the Swiss volunteers (319 +/- 73 ng ml-1 for the tablet, and 369 +/- 121 ng ml-1 for the suspension). 4 Estimates of the oral clearance CLpo of unlabelled mefloquine were significantly lower (17.5 +/- 4.4 ml h-1 kg-1) in the Thai patients compared with 28.8 +/- 3.5 ml h-1 kg-1 in the Swiss volunteers; P less than 0.05). Terminal elimination half-lives were significantly shorter in the patients (10.3 +/- 2.5 days) than in the volunteers (16.7 +/- 1.9 days; P less than 0.005). Differences of a similar magnitude were observed when comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the deuteromefloquine plasma concentrations. 5 Both genetic and disease related factors are likely to account for the large pharmacokinetic differences between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily controlled-release oxybutynin and immediate-release oxybutynin

Oxybutynin is used to treat patients with urinary urgency, frequency, and urge incontinence. In this 2-way, multiple-dose, crossover study, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily controlled-release oxybutynin were compared with immediate-release oxybutynin. Eighteen healthy male volunteers received one 15-mg controlled-release oxybutynin tablet once daily for 5 days or one 5-mg immediate-release oxybutynin tablet every 8 hours for 5 days. The washout period between treatments was > or =7 days. The mean steady-state AUC for oxybutynin following controlled-release oxybutynin treatment was higher (73.0 ng.h/mL) than following immediate-release oxybutynin treatment (53.6 ng.h/mL) (P = .0001). The mean C(max) was lower for controlled-release oxybutynin (5.7 ng/mL) than for immediate-release oxybutynin (7.5 ng/mL) (P = .0051), with a smaller fluctuation in oxybutynin plasma concentration for controlled-release oxybutynin (135.6%) than for immediate-release oxybutynin (319.3%) (P = .0001). Mean stimulated saliva output was greater for controlled-release oxybutynin, and mean dry mouth severity was less than immediate-release oxybutynin.     

Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of oral pirmenol, a new antiarrhythmic drug

Pirmenol is a new orally effective antiarrhythmic agent. Reported are the results of oral administration of pirmenol to six patients (age 48.5 +/- 8.6 years, weight 83 +/- 15 kg) with stable ventricular extrasystoles (PVCs)--average ectopy rate 1040 +/- 630/hr (mean +/- SD). Patients received oral doses of placebo or 200 mg of pirmenol in a double-blind cross-over fashion followed by a single-blind rising-dose administration of 250 mg and 300 mg of pirmenol. The time period between doses was 48 hours. Pirmenol was rapidly absorbed (time to peak plasma levels 1 to 1.5 hours) and the mean maximum plasma concentrations were 1.8, 2.7 and 3.4 micrograms/mL with 200-mg, 250-mg and 300-mg doses, respectively. The elimination half-life was 9.3 +/- 3.0 hours and 31 +/- 14% of the dose was recovered in urine. The response criterion (80% suppression of PVCs of control for 8 hours) was met after the 300-mg dose in three patients. In three patients greater than 80% reduction occurred for up to 8 hours after the 200-mg dose. Pirmenol administration was not associated with any significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, hepatic and renal function, PR interval or QRS duration. LV ejection fraction determined echocardiographically decreased from 63.0 +/- 6.9% predose to 59.7 +/- 5.0% about 2 hours after the 300-mg dose and QT interval increased by less than 10%. Two patients complained of transient bad taste sensation. Our results suggest that 250 mg to 300 mg of pirmenol, administered twice a day will suppress the PVCs effectively.     

Relationship between plasma and oral fluid nicotine concentrations in humans: a pilot study

The relationship between plasma and oral fluid concentrations of nicotine after infusion at varying times was investigated. Five healthy human volunteers were administered 0, 0.75, and 1.5 mg nicotine as 0.5-, 1.0-, 2.5-, and 5-minute infusions. Blood and oral fluid were collected before drug administration and for 4 hours thereafter. Nicotine concentrations were determined by HPLC using a limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Plasma nicotine concentrations were dose related. Peak plasma concentrations (mean+/-SD) at the 4 infusion times were 14.1+/-5.5, 11.8+/-5.3, 12.8+/-1.9, and 11.5+/-4.0 ng/mL (N=5) after the 0.75-mg dose and 26.3+/-11.7, 19.3+/-12.8, 24.54+/-10.4, and 19.02+/-6.5 ng/mL after the 1.5-mg dose. In general, the highest peak concentration occurred at the shortest infusion time at each dose. Peak nicotine oral fluid concentrations (mean+/-SD) at the 4 infusion times of 22.4+/-29.1, 22.64+/-29.9, 19.1+/-13.5, and 49.1+/-31.7 ng/mL (n=5) after the low dose and 35.8+/-21.1, 26.0+/-7.7, 33.3+/-28.8, and 104.0+/-68.9 ng/mL, after the 1.5 mg dose. The highest oral fluid concentration of nicotine occurred at the longest infusion time at each dose. Oral fluid/plasma were >1 for up to 60 minutes after the low dose and 120 minutes after the high dose. There was no correlation between plasma and oral fluid nicotine concentrations.     

Levetiracetam: relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of a 10% oral solution (750 mg) and 750-mg tablets

Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug, is used worldwide as an adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures. The availability of a new oral solution formulation would provide an additional treatment option for patients who have difficulty swallowing tablets. A phase I single-center, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-dose study was conducted to confirm that a 10% oral solution of levetiracetam was bioequivalent to the 750-mg oral tablet and to characterize its pharmacokinetics. Each of 24 healthy subjects received a single oral 750-mg dose of the randomized levetiracetam formulation (7.5 mL of 10% solution or 750-mg tablet) on day 1 and a single oral dose of the alternate formulation on day 8. Serial blood samples were collected from 0 to 36 hours after each dose administration for determination of plasma levetiracetam concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, and bioequivalence of the two formulations was evaluated. The mean levetiracetam plasma concentration-time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters essentially were identical for the oral 10% solution and tablet and consistent with previously reported levetiracetam pharmacokinetics. The 90% confidence limits of the geometric mean ratio of the two formulations for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable time point, and maximum plasma concentration were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating bioequivalence of the two formulations. Both levetiracetam formulations were well tolerated. The levetiracetam 10% oral solution is a bioequivalent, well-tolerated alternative to the tablet formulation in patients who have difficulty swallowing.