Inhibition of interleukin-8 release in the human colonic epithelial cell line HT-29 by cannabinoids

We have investigated the effects of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists on tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced secretion of interleukin-8 from the colonic epithelial cell line, HT-29. The cannabinoid receptor agonists [(-)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethyl-heptyl)-phenyl]4-[3-hydroxypropyl]cyclo-hexan-1-ol] (CP55,940); Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol; [R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl) methyl] pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl) methanone mesylate] (WIN55,212-2) and 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-naphthoyl-indole (JWH 015) inhibited TNF-alpha induced release of interleukin-8 in a concentration-dependent manner. The less active enantiomer of WIN55212-2, [S(-)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl) methanone mesylate (WIN55212-3), and the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist arachidonoyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) had no significant effect on TNF-alpha-induced release of interleukin-8. The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,4-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A; 10(-6) M) antagonised the inhibitory effect of CP55,940 (pA(2)=8.3+/-0.2, n=6) but did not antagonise the inhibitory effects of WIN55212-2 and JWH 015. The cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist N-(1,S)-endo1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo(2,2,1)heptan-2-yl)-5(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR144528; 10(-6) M) antagonised the inhibitory effects of CP55,940 (pA(2)=8.2+/-0.8, n=6), WIN55212-2 (pA(2)=7.1+/-0.3, n=6) and JWH 015 (pA(2)=7.6+/-0.3, n=6), respectively. Western immunoblotting of HT-29 cell lysates revealed a protein with a size that is consistent with the presence of cannabinoid CB(2) receptors. We conclude that in HT-29 cells, TNF-alpha-induced interleukin-8 release is inhibited by cannabinoids through activation of cannabinoid CB(2) receptors.     

Mutational analysis and molecular modelling of the antagonist SR 144528 binding site on the human cannabinoid CB(2) receptor

We have investigated the binding site of the subtype specific antagonist SR 144528, (N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2. 1]heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methoxybenzyl)- pyrazo le-3-carboxamide) on the human cannabinoid CB(2) receptor based on functional studies with mutated receptors. Two serine residues in the fourth transmembrane region, Ser(161) and Ser(165), were singly mutated to the cognate cannabinoid CB(1) receptor residue, alanine, and each gave receptors with wild-type properties for the cannabinoid agonists CP 55,940 (1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol) and WIN 55212-2 (R)-(+)[2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthalenyl) methanone, which SR 144528 completely failed to antagonise. Molecular modelling studies show that SR 144528 interacts with residues in transmembrane domains 3, 4, and 5 of the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor through a combination of hydrogen bonds and aromatic and hydrophobic interactions. In addition, the replacement by serine of a nearby cannabinoid CB(2) receptor-specific residue, Cys(175) resulted in wild-type receptor properties with CP 55,940, loss of SR 144528 binding and eight-fold reduced binding and activity of WIN 55212-2, a result compatible with a recently-proposed binding site model for WIN 55212-2.     

The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55212-2 inhibits neurogenic inflammations in airway tissues

We examined the effects of a cannabinoid receptor agonist, (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-merpholino)methyl]pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl)methanone (WIN 55212-2), on various respiratory reactions induced by the activation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent sensory nerves (C-fibers). WIN 55212-2 significantly inhibited capsaicin-induced guinea pig bronchoconstriction, but not the neurokinin A-induced reaction. Intravenous injection of WIN 55212-2 also blocked cigarette smoke-induced rat tracheal plasma extravasation. However, substance P-induced rat tracheal plasma extravasation was not affected by the administration of WIN 55212-2. A cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist, {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide} (SR 144528) reduced the inhibitory effects of WIN 55212-2, but not a cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist, [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamidehydrochloride] (SR 141716A). A Maxi-K(+) channel opener, 1-(2'-hydroxy-5'-trifluoromethylphenyl)-5-trifluoromethyl-2(3H)benzimidazolone (NS 1619), specifically inhibited capsaicin-induced guinea pig bronchoconstriction and cigarette smoke-induced rat tracheal plasma extravasation. These findings suggest that WIN 55212-2 inhibits the activation of C-fibers via cannabinoid CB(2) receptors and Maxi-K(+) channels and reduces airway neurogenic inflammatory reactions in vivo.     

Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit Ca(2+) influx to synaptosomes from rat brain

We examined the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on (45)Ca(2+) uptake in rat brain synaptosomes. A cannabinoid receptor agonist, (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-merpholino)methyl]pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl)methanone (WIN 55212-2) dose-dependently inhibited (45)Ca(2+) uptake in rat synaptosomes. Only an endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist, anandamide, dose-dependently inhibited (45)Ca(2+) uptake in rat synaptosomes, but not an endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist, palmitoylethanolamide. Only a cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamidehydrochloride] (SR 141716A), reversed the inhibitory effect of these WIN 55212-2 and anandamide on (45)Ca(2+) uptake in rat synaptosomes, but not a cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist, [N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide] (SR 144528). The inhibitory effects of WIN 55212-2 and anandamide on (45)Ca(2+) uptake in rat synaptosomes were reversed by the pretreatment of a voltage-sensitive A-type K(+) channel blocker, dendrotoxin, but no other type of K(+) channel blockers, i.e. iberiotoxin, charybdotoxin or glibenclamide. These findings suggest that cannabinoid receptors inhibit Ca(2+) influx into rat brain nerves via the activation of CB1 receptors and the opening of voltage-sensitive A-type K(+) channels.     

Cannabinoid penetration into mouse brain as determined by ex vivo binding.

We have used an ex vivo binding assay in the mouse to evaluate the brain penetration of cannabinoid receptor ligands. After intraperitoneal or oral administration, the pharmacological activity linked to the compound was assessed by using by [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding on cerebellar membranes. The brain penetration was high for compounds like methanandamide or delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol but poor for synthetic agonists such as (cis)-3-(2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-(trans)-4-(3-hydr oxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55940) or, R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-d e]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-napthalenyl)methanone monomethane-sulfonate (WIN 55212-2). After oral administration the duration of action of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, methanandamide and WIN 55212-2 is limited and decreased 4 h after administration. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist: N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-met hyl-1 H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A) exhibited a good brain penetration and a long duration of action.     

Pharmacological characterisation of cannabinoid receptors inhibiting interleukin 2 release from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

The effects of a range of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists on phytohaemagglutinin-induced secretion of interleukin-2 from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated. The nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[4-morpholinylmethyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl) methanone mesylate) and the selective cannabinoid CB(2) receptor agonist JWH 015 ((2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1-napthalenylmethanone) inhibited phytohaemagglutinin (10 microg/ml)-induced release of interleukin-2 in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(1/2max), WIN55212-2=8.8 x 10(-7) M, 95% confidence limits (C.L.)=2.2 x 10(-7)-3.5 x 10(-6) M; JWH 015=1.8 x 10(-6) M, 95% C.L.=1.2 x 10(-6)-2.9 x 10(-6) M, n=5). The nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists CP55,940 ((-)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethyl-hepthyl)-phenyl]4-[3-hydroxypropyl]cyclo-hexan-1-ol), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist ACEA (arachidonoyl-2-chloroethylamide) had no significant (P>0.05) inhibitory effect on phytohaemagglutinin-induced release of interleukin-2. Dexamethasone significantly (P<0.05) inhibited phytohaemagglutinin-induced release of interleukin-2 in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(1/2max)=1.3 x 10(-8) M, 95% C.L.=1.4 x 10(-9)-3.2 x 10(-8) M). The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride) (10(-6) M) did not antagonise the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2 whereas the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528 (N-(1,S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo(2,2,1)heptan-2-yl)-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide) antagonised the inhibitory effect of WIN55212-2 (pA(2)=6.3+/-0.1, n=5). In addition, CP55,940 (10(-6) M) and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (10(-6) M) also antagonised the inhibitory effects of WIN55212-2 (pA(2)=6.1+/-0.1, n=5 and pA(2)=6.9+/-0.2, n=5). In summary, WIN55,212-2 and JWH 015 inhibited interleukin-2 release from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells via the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor. In contrast, CP55,940 and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol behaved as partial agonists/antagonists in these cells.     

Systemic effect of cannabinoids on the spontaneous firing rate of locus coeruleus neurons in rats

Previous reports have described modulation of noradrenergic activity by cannabinoid receptors. The aim of the present research was to examine the effect of two synthetic cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonists, R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)-methyl]pyrrolol-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone (WIN 55212-2) and (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexanol (CP 55940), on the spontaneous activity of locus coeruleus noradrenergic neurons by single-unit extracellular recordings in vivo and in vitro. In anaesthetized rats, intravenous administrations of WIN 55212-2 (31.3-500 microg/kg) or CP 55940 (31.3-500 microg/kg) increased the firing rate of locus coeruleus neurons in a dose-dependent manner. The stimulatory effect of WIN 55212-2 was blocked by pretreatment with the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 141716A; 2 mg/kg). Paradoxically, local administration of WIN 55212-2 (8.3-31.3 pmol) into the locus coeruleus and intracerebroventricular injections of WIN 55212-2 (10-20 microg) or CP 55940 (20-40 microg) failed to change the spontaneous firing rate of locus coeruleus neurons. Likewise, in rat brain slice preparations perfusion with WIN 55212-2 (10 microM) or CP 55940 (10-30 microM) did not specifically affect the spontaneous firing rate of locus coeruleus cells. Therefore, we conclude that synthetic cannabinoids increase the spontaneous firing activity of noradrenergic neurons in the rat locus coeruleus through cannabinoid CB1 receptors. This stimulation appears to be indirectly induced via a receptor mechanism probably located at the peripheral level.     

Inhibition of small intestinal secretion by cannabinoids is CB1 receptor-mediated in rats

We tested the hypothesis that cannabinoids, acting via a neuronal mechanism of action decrease small intestinal secretion. In vitro electrical stimulation induced ileal secretion in rats, that was attenuated by a cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2, (mesylate(R)-(+)-[2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[4-morpholino)methyl]pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl)methanone) but not its optical isomer WIN 55212-3. The inhibition of secretion induced by WIN 55212-2 was reversed by SR141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist. An ileal secretory response stimulated by acetylcholine was unaffected by WIN 55212-2. These findings show that cannabinoids inhibit neurally mediated secretion via cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Thus, cannabinoids may have therapeutic potential for diarrhea unresponsive to available therapies.     

Inhibition of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices by anandamide and WIN55212-2: reversal by SR141716 A,a selective antagonist of CB1 cannabinoid receptors

It has been reported previously that ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and the synthetic cannabinoid agonist HU-210 [(–)-11-OH-⁸-dimethylheptyl tetrahydrocannabinol] prevent long-term potentiation (LTP) induction in rat hippocampal slices. In this study we confirm that both WIN55212-2 {R-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[{4-morpholinyl} methyl] pyrol [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl) (1-naphtalenyl) methanone monomethanesulphonate} (3 and 10 M), another synthetic cannabinoid agonist, and anandamide (10 M), considered to be the endogenous ligand of cannabinoid receptors, inhibit LTP formation in the Schaffer collateral-CA1 field complex. In addition, we show that SRt417l6A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-lH-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] at 0.1–10 M, a potent and selective antagonist of CB1 cannabinoid receptors, concentration-dependently reversed the inhibition of LTP induced by both WIN55212-2 and anandamide. These data indicate that cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit hippocampal LTP formation through CB1 receptor activation and that anandamide could be a candidate for an endogenous neuromessenger involved in memory processes.     

Differences in the relative potency of SR 141716A and AM 251 as antagonists of various in vivo effects of cannabinoid agonists in C57BL/6J mice

Although the cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 141716A) blocks many of the in vivo effects of cannabinoids, the antagonist activity of SR 141716A is limited under some conditions. The general aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the limited antagonist activity of SR 141716A generalizes to the cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM 251); and 2) examine mechanisms by which cannabinoids produce hypothermia, catalepsy, and hypoactivity in C57BL/6J mice. SR 141716A and AM 251 were administered alone and in combination with the cannabinoid agonists triangle up(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (triangle up(9)-THC) and R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)-methyl]pyrrolol-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone (WIN 55212-2). triangle up(9)-THC and WIN 55212-2 produced catalepsy, hypothermia, and hypoactivity with similar potency; WIN 55212-2 produced greater hypothermia than triangle up(9)-THC, otherwise differences in maximal effect were not detected in the other assays. When administered alone, the antagonists did not produce catalepsy or alter body temperature and they decreased locomotor activity. SR 1417167A and AM 251 blocked catalepsy and hypothermia, and partially attenuated hypoactivity, produced by triangle up(9)-THC and WIN 55212-2. While the antagonists were equipotent in blocking agonist-induced hypothermia, SR 141716A was 6-fold more potent than AM 251 in blocking agonist-induced catalepsy. The results demonstrate that SR 141716A and AM 251 have strikingly similar behavioral activity, i.e., they block some and not other in vivo effects of cannabinoid agonists, and further demonstrate differences in the maximum effect of cannabinoid agonists that might be related to differences in agonist efficacy. While the results strongly suggest that cannabinoid CB(1) receptors mediate the hypothermic and cataleptic effects of cannabinoids, differences in the relative potency of antagonists suggest that mechanisms responsible for these effects are not identical.     

Evidence for a new G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor in mouse brain.

The purpose of these studies was to support the hypothesis that an undiscovered cannabinoid receptor exists in brain. [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding was stimulated by anandamide and WIN55212-2 in brain membranes from both CB(1)(+/+) and CB(1)(-/-) mice. In contrast, a wide variety of other compounds that are known to activate CB(1) receptors, including CP55940, HU-210, and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, failed to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in CB(1)(-/-) membranes. In CB(1)(-/-) membranes, SR141716A affected both basal and anandamide- or WIN55212-2-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding only at concentrations greater than 1 microM. In CB(1)(+/+) membranes, SR141716A inhibited only 84% of anandamide and 67% of WIN55212-2 stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding with an affinity appropriate for mediation by CB(1) receptors (K(B) approximately 0.5 nM). The remaining stimulation seemed to be inhibited with lower potency (IC(50) approximately 5 microM) similar to that seen in CB(1)(-/-) membranes or in the absence of agonist. Further experiments determined that the effects of anandamide and WIN55212-2 were not additive, but that the effect of mu opioid, adenosine A1, and cannabinoid ligands were additive. Finally, assays of different central nervous system (CNS) regions demonstrated significant activity of cannabinoids in CB(1)(-/-) membranes from brain stem, cortex, hippocampus, diencephalon, midbrain, and spinal cord, but not basal ganglia or cerebellum. Moreover, some of these same CNS regions also showed significant binding of [(3)H]WIN55212-2, but not [(3)H]CP55940. Thus anandamide and WIN55212-2 seemed to be active in CB(1)(-/-) mouse brain membranes via a common G protein-coupled receptor with a distinct CNS distribution, implying the existence of an unknown cannabinoid receptor subtype in brain.     

Antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist

Several lines of evidence indicate that the opioid and cannabinoid systems produce synergistic interactions. The present study examined the opioid receptors involved in the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[4-morpholinylmethyl]-pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthyl) methanone mesylate), a high-affinity cannabinoid receptor agonist, in mice. WIN 55212-2, at doses of 0.3-3 mg/kg ip, produced a dose-dependent antitussive effect. This antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2 was antagonized by pretreatment with either methysergide (3 mg/kg ip), a 5-HT receptor antagonist, or naloxone (1 mg/kg ip), an opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, pretreatment with N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A, 3 mg/kg ip), a cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, also significantly reduced the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2. Blockade of mu-opioid receptors by pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg sc) significantly reduced the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2. However, pretreatment with nor-binaltorphimine (20 mg/kg sc), a kappa-opioid receptor antagonist, did not affect the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2. Pretreatment with naloxonazine (35 mg/kg sc), a mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist, also did not affect the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2. These results indicate that the antitussive effect of WIN 55212-2 is mediated by the activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors and mu(2) (naloxonazine-insensitive)-opioid receptors, but not mu(1) (naloxonazine-sensitive)- or kappa-opioid receptors.     

Suppression by WIN55212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, of inflammatory reactions in mouse ear: Interference with the actions of an endogenous ligand, 2-arachidonoylglycerol

The effect of WIN55212-2, a cannabinoid receptor agonist, on acute inflammation of mouse ear was investigated. We found that topical application of WIN55212-2 suppressed ear swelling induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate or 2-arachidonoylglycerol. Similar inhibition was observed with CP55940, another cannabinoid receptor agonist, and HU-308, a cannabinoid CB(2) receptor-selective agonist. WIN55212-2 also suppressed the infiltration of leukocytes induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate. On the other hand, WIN55212-3, an inactive enantiomer of WIN55212-2, exerted only small effects on inflammation. Notably, SR144528, a cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist, also suppressed inflammatory reactions in mouse ear. Thus, both the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor agonist and antagonist are capable of reducing inflammatory reactions. We then investigated the mechanism underlying WIN55212-2-induced suppression of inflammation using cultured cells. We found that the addition of WIN55212-2 together with 2-arachidonoylglycerol blocked 2-arachidonoylglycerol-induced migration of human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells that had been differentiated into macrophage-like cells. The restoration of 2-arachidonoylglycerol-desensitized cells and WIN55212-2-desensitized cells from an anergic condition was examined next. We found that 2-arachidonoylglycerol-treated cells rapidly recovered the capacity to respond to 2-arachidonoylglycerol. On the other hand, the anergic condition toward 2-arachidonoylglycerol continued for a longer period after pretreatment with WIN55212-2. These results suggest that the anti-inflammatory activity of WIN55212-2 is attributable, at least in part, to interference with the actions of the endogenous ligand, 2-arachidonoylglycerol.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of BAY 38-7271, a novel cannabinoid receptor agonist

BAY 38-7271 [(-)-(R)-3-(2-hydroxymethylindanyl-4-oxy)phenyl-4,4,4-trifluoro-1-sulfonate] is a novel, highly potent and selective cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist with neuroprotective properties. It was the aim of the present study to further confirm its cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist properties in a highly sensitive in vivo assay. Male Wistar rats (n=24) were trained to discriminate BAY 38-7271 (0.05 mg/kg, i.p., t-30 min) from vehicle in a fixed-ratio:10, food-reinforced two-lever standard procedure. The animals acquired the discrimination after a median number of 52 training sessions. BAY 38-7271 generalized dose-dependently when tested after different routes of administration (ED(50): 0.018 mg/kg, i.p.; 0.001 microg/kg, i.v.; 0.18 mg/kg, p.o.). A time-dependency study indicated that the cue (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) was detectable between 15 min and 4 h, with a maximum of generalization obtained at 30 min after administration. Pretreatment with the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] completely antagonized the effects of BAY 38-7271 (ID(50): 1.1 mg/kg, i.p.). Dose-dependent and complete generalization was also obtained after i.p. administration of the reference cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists HU-210 [(-)-11-OH-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethylheptyl, ED(50): 0.003 mg/kg], CP 55,940 [(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4(1,1-dimethyl-heptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol, 0.007 mg/kg], WIN 55,212-2 [(R)-4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphtalenylcarbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo [3,2,1-ij] quinolin-6-one, 0.28 mg/kg] and (-)-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (0.34 mg/kg). The present study confirms that BAY 38-7271 is a highly potent cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist in vivo.     

Effects of cannabinoids on non-adrenergic non-cholinergic-mediated relaxation in guinea-pig trachea

The effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on the non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory responses to electrical field stimulation in guinea-pig trachea were assessed. R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholilinyl) methyl]pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2; 10(-5) M) significantly enhanced the frequency-dependent response to electrical stimulation. The same concentration of R-(N)-(2-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (R(+)methanandamide) and 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015) did not affect significantly the electrically induced inhibitory NANC responses. The effect of WIN 55,212-2 was not modified by the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor-selective antagonists, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A; 10(-5) M) and N-(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 144528; 10(-5) M), respectively. Moreover, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NG-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10(-4) M), but not the peptidase, alpha-chymotrypsin (2 U/ml), blocked the effect of WIN 55,212-2. Postsynaptically, WIN 55,212-2 did not produce any change of tracheal smooth muscle tone, either basal or histamine-induced, and did not interfere with the relaxant activity of the nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside (10(-8)-10(-4) M). In conclusion, our results suggest that (a) cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor stimulation does not alter the inhibitory NANC transmission in guinea-pig trachea, and (b) WIN 55,212-2 potentiates the NO-mediated component of the NANC relaxant response to electrical stimulation through a cannabinoid receptor-independent mechanism.     

The effects of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol physical dependence on brain cannabinoid receptors

The effects of chronic Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol on cannabinoid receptor levels and receptor-G-protein coupling were investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused continuously with low or high dose regimens of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol or vehicle for 4 days. Following treatment, rats were sacrificed for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor binding analysis or challenged with the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide HCl (SR141716A). The rats receiving Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol exhibited antagonist-precipitated withdrawal signs. Each brain region (cerebellum, cortex, hippocampus and basal ganglia) from high-dose rats showed 30-70% decreases in [3H] (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)cyclohexanol (WIN55212-2) B(max) values, indicating receptor down-regulation. Most regions showed decreased WIN55212-2-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-3-thiotriphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding, indicating desensitization of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. Additional receptor binding assays in cerebellar membranes showed a significantly greater decrease in agonist than in antagonist B(max) values, indicating a lower fraction of coupled receptors after treatment. Concentration-effect analysis of five agonists revealed that the treatment resulted in greater decreases in the efficacy of low-efficacy agonists.     

Antiemetic and motor-depressive actions of CP55,940: cannabinoid CB1 receptor characterization,distribution, and G-protein activation

Dibenzopyran (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) and aminoalkylindole [R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate; (WIN55,212-2)] cannabinoids suppress vomiting produced by cisplatin via cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. This study investigates the antiemetic potential of the "nonclassical" cannabinoid CP55,940 [1alpha,2beta-(R)-5alpha]-(-)-5-(1,1-dimethyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexyl-phenol] against cisplatin-induced vomiting and assesses the presence and functionality of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) brain. CP55,940 (0.025-0.3 mg/kg) reduced both the frequency of cisplatin-induced emesis (ID(50)=0.025 mg/kg) and the percentage of shrews vomiting (ID(50)=0.09 mg/kg). CP55,940 also suppressed shrew motor behaviors (ID(50)=0.06- 0.21 mg/kg) at such doses. The antiemetic and motor-suppressant actions of CP55,940 were countered by SR141716A [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide], indicating both effects are cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated. Autoradiographic studies with [3H]-SR141716A and [35S]-GTPgammaS binding revealed that the distribution of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and its activation pattern are similar to rodent brain and significant levels are present in brain loci (e.g., nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)) that control emesis. The affinity rank order of structurally diverse cannabinoid ligands for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in shrew brain is similar to rodent brain: HU-210=CP55,940=SR141716A>/=WIN55,212-2>/=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol>methanandamide=HU-211=cannabidiol=2-arachidonoylglycerol. This affinity order is also similar and is highly correlated to the cannabinoid EC(50) potency rank order for GTPgammaS stimulation except WIN55,212-2 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol potency order were reversed. The affinity and the potency rank order of tested cannabinoids were significantly correlated with their antiemetic ID(50) potency order against cisplatin-induced vomiting (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) as well as emesis produced by 2-arachidonoylglycerol or SR141716A (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2>delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).     

Involvement of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor-mediated response and efficacy of cannabinoid CB(2) receptor inverse agonist, JTE-907, in cutaneous inflammation in mice

Involvement of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor and effect of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonists on cutaneous inflammation were investigated. Mice ears topically exposed to an ether-linked analogue of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG-E) or selective cannabinoid CB₂ receptor agonist, {4-[4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2,6-dimethoxy-phenyl]-6.6-dimethyl-bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-en-2-yl}-methanol (HU-308), had early and late ear swelling (0–24 h and 1–8 days after exposure, respectively). Both types of responses induced by 2-AG-E were significantly suppressed by oral administration of cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonists, [N-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl)-7-methoxy-2-oxo-8-pentyloxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide] (JTE-907) and {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide}} (SR144528). In contrast, JTE-907 did not affect arachidonic acid-induced swelling. Orally administered JTE-907 (0.1–10 mg/kg) and SR144528 (1 mg/kg) also produced significant inhibition of dinitrofluorobenzene-induced ear swelling, with increased cannabinoid CB₂ receptor mRNA expression observed in the inflamed ear. These results suggest that cannabinoid CB₂ receptor is partially involved in local inflammatory responses and cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist has beneficial effects on ear swelling.     

Cannabinoids modulate neuronal firing in the rat basolateral amygdala: evidence for CB1- and non-CB1-mediated actions

Recent evidence indicates that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) may be involved in behavioural effects induced by cannabinoids. High levels of CB1 cannabinoid receptors have been shown in this region, where they modulate excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission. However, the neurophysiological effects of these opposing synaptic actions have not been investigated in vivo. To this purpose, single-unit extracellular recordings were performed in urethane anaesthetized rats in order to determine whether exogenously applied cannabinoids influenced the spontaneous or evoked electrical activity of neurons in the BLA. The effects of cannabinoids were found to be dependent on the characteristics of the neurons examined and on the properties of the agents used. We tested and compared two structurally different synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, the highly potent HU-210 (0.125-1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and WIN55212-2 (WIN, 0.125-1.0 mg/kg, i.v.). With a CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent mechanism, HU-210 potently inhibited the firing rate of BLA interneurons whereas WIN modulated the discharge rate in a biphasic manner. By contrast, BLA projection neurons, antidromically identified from the shell of the nucleus accumbens, were significantly inhibited by WIN at all doses tested, while HU-210 administration led to less consistent effects, since only 1.0 mg/kg inhibited firing rate in the majority of recorded neurons. Additionally, WIN, but not HU-210, significantly attenuated short-latency spiking activity in BLA projection neurons evoked by electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. In these neurons, WIN-induced effects were antagonised by the non-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A and by the vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine, but not by the selective CB1 antagonist AM-251. Taken together, our findings indicate that the overall excitability of efferent neurons in the BLA is strongly reduced by WIN in a non-CB1-dependent manner. In this effect, the contribution of a novel cannabinoid-vanilloid-sensitive putative non-CB1 receptors, the existence of which was postulated in recent reports, might play a role.     

Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists increase rat cortical and hippocampal acetylcholine release in vivo

Intravenous administration of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists (R-(+)-[2, 3-Dihydro-5-methyl-3[morpholinyl)methyl]-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate), WIN 55,212-2 (10, 37.5, 75 and 150 microg/kg), and ((6aR)-trans-3-(1, 1-Dimethylheptyl)-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-hydroxy-6, 6-dimethyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-9-methanol), HU 210 (1 and 4 microg/kg) dose-dependently increased acetylcholine release in dialysates from the prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus of freely moving rats. Administration of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3 carboxamide]HCl, SR 141716A, at a dose that per se did not affect basal acetylcholine release (2. 5 microg/kg), prevented the increase of acetylcholine release by WIN 55,212-2 (150 microg/kg i.v.) or by HU 210 (4 microg/kg i.v.) in both areas. These data demonstrate that, at low i.v. doses, the synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists, WIN 55,212-2 and HU 210 stimulate cortical and hippocampal acetylcholine release.