Validation of a radiographic damage index in chronic gout

OBJECTIVE: To identify a valid method to measure radiographic damage in patients with chronic gout. METHODS: The scoring method that best represented radiographic damage in individual joints was analyzed by comparing a gold standard rheumatologist consensus global score with recognized scoring methods, including the Sharp/van der Heijde erosion and narrowing scores, Ratingen destruction score, and Steinbrocker score. Ninety-five proximal interphalangeal joints from 12 patients with gout were included in this analysis. Scoring of hand and feet radiographs from an additional 35 patients with gout was used to analyze the sites to be included in a scoring system and the additional features to be recorded. RESULTS: For individual joints, the combination of the Sharp/van der Heijde erosion and narrowing scores correlated best with the consensus global score. In addition, the limits of agreement were narrowest for the combined Sharp/van der Heijde erosion and narrowing score. All joint areas in the Sharp/van der Heijde rheumatoid arthritis score and the distal interphalangeal joints were affected by chronic gout and contributed to the total score. Additional features (extraarticular erosions, joint space widening, and ankylosis) occurred infrequently, and scoring of these features did not increase the reliability of the total score. The reliability of the total score was high: intraclass correlation coefficient for intraobserver reproducibility was 0.993-0.998 and for interobserver reproducibility was 0.963-0.966. The modified Sharp/van der Heijde score was able to discriminate between early and advanced disease. CONCLUSION: A modified Sharp/van der Heijde system accurately and reliably represents radiographic joint damage in chronic gout.     

Minimal clinically important difference in radiological progression of joint damage over 1 year in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results of a validation study with clinical experts

To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) between hand and foot films with a 1 year interval assessed with the Sharp/van der Heijde or Larsen/Scott scoring method. Progression scores of the 2 methods were compared with the opinion of an international expert panel on clinical relevance of radiological joint damage in 4 predefined clinical settings. The expert panel consisted of 3 rheumatologists, who evaluated 46 pairs of hand and foot films, taken with 1 year intervals, of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Receiver operating characteristics curves analyzed the accuracy of different threshold values (progression scores) of the 2 scoring methods to detect the presence or absence of clinically important difference, as defined by the expert panel as external criterion. The threshold value with the highest accuracy was subsequently chosen as the score representing the MCID. Five Sharp/van der Heijde units and 2 Larsen/Scott units were the best cutoffs. The accompanying sensitivities ranged from 77% to 100% for the Sharp/van der Heijde method and from 73% to 84% for the Larsen/Scott method for the 4 clinical settings. The specificities were between 78% and 84% for the Sharp/van der Heijde method and between 74% and 94% for the Larsen/Scott method. The smallest progression score that can be detected apart from interobserver measurement error, the smallest detectable difference (SDD), was equal to or larger than the calculated MCID, 5 Sharp/van der Heijde units and 6 Larsen/Scott units in our study, if the mean progression scores of the same 2 observers were used. The SDD is a conservative estimate of the MCID; our panel rated progression at or below this level as clinically significant.     

Adapted versions of the Sharp/van der Heijde score are reliable and valid for assessment of radiographic progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To develop adapted versions of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic scoring system for use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to investigate their validity in JIA patients with polyarticular disease. METHODS: The study group comprised 177 patients with polyarticular JIA. Radiographs of the wrist/hand of each patient were obtained at baseline (first observation) and then at 1, 3, 5, 7/8, and 10 years and were assessed independently by 2 pediatric rheumatologists according to different adaptations of the Sharp/van der Heijde method. To facilitate score assignment, the radiograph for each patient was compared with a bone age-related standard. Validation procedures included analysis of reliability, construct validity, and score progression over time. RESULTS: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement on longitudinal score values and score changes was good for all of the adapted scoring versions (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.85). Score changes over time were moderately to strongly correlated with the clinical indicators of long-term joint damage and with the amount of long-term radiographic damage as measured with the carpo:metacarpal ratio, thereby demonstrating good construct validity. A steady increase in scores over time was observed, with joint space narrowing being the most common form of damage throughout the disease course. The inclusion of 5 new areas appeared to increase the overall construct validity of erosion scores. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the adapted versions of the Sharp/van der Heijde score are reliable and valid for the assessment of radiographic progression in patients with JIA.     

Use of the Sharp and Larsen scoring methods in the assessment of radiographic progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the applicability of the Sharp and Larsen scoring methods for radiographic damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Wrist/hand radiographs of 25 patients with polyarthritis obtained at first observation and then yearly for 4-5 years were assessed independently by 2 pediatric rheumatologists according to the Sharp and Larsen methods. To facilitate score assignment, each patient radiograph was compared with a bone age-related standard. A third pediatric rheumatologist measured the Poznanski score, and a pediatric radiologist provided a semiquantitative assessment of radiographic damage severity. RESULTS: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement on longitudinal scores were good for both Sharp and Larsen methods, with intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Agreement on change assessment was good for the Sharp method and moderate for the Larsen method. Both methods yielded a steady increase in scores during the study, with score change being more marked in the first year. Sharp and Larsen scores were highly correlated (r(s) = 0.96). Correlations of both scores with the Poznanski score were moderate to high (r(s) from -0.62 to -0.72). Radiologist score was correlated at borderline-high level with both Sharp (r(s) = 0.70) and Larsen (r(s) = 0.71) scores. Sharp and Larsen score change from baseline to final visit was moderately to highly correlated with the number of joints with active arthritis and restricted motion and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire score at final visit. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the Sharp and Larsen scoring systems are potentially reliable and valid for assessment of radiographic progression in patients with polyarticular JIA.     

Correlation of six different cystic fibrosis chest radiograph scoring systems with clinical parameters

In past decades, several chest radiograph scoring systems for cystic fibrosis were developed. This study was performed to compare interobserver variability of six different radiograph scores and to correlate them with clinical parameters. Thirty chest radiographs of 30 patients with cystic fibrosis were scored according to Shwachman-Kulczycki scoring, Chrispin-Norman scoring, adjusted Chrispin-Norman scoring, Brasfield scoring, Wisconsin scoring, and the Northern scoring system by two independent observers. Data on clinical parameters such as lung function, nutritional status, and infectious exacerbation rate, obtained simultaneously with the chest radiograph, were reviewed. Interobserver variability was low (Pearson's correlation coefficients, 0.76-0.84; all P < 0.01), and scores had good limits of agreement (Bland and Altman). Correlation of radiograph score with clinical parameters was good for most pulmonary function test data (correlation coefficients from 0.72-0.78 for percent of forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)%) predicted and from 0.69-0.74 for FVC% predicted) and for infectious exacerbation rate (correlation coefficients from 0.68-0.73). All six radiograph scoring systems, especially the Chrispin-Norman score, showed a low interobserver variability and correlated well with lung function tests, especially FEV(1)% predicted and infectious exacerbation rate, and moderately with maximum work capacity and thoracic mobility.     

Clinical evaluation of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis

Four rheumatologists and 2 radiologists utilized 3 reading techniques to evaluate clinical radiographic progression in selected serial hand and wrist films from 5 rheumatoid arthritis patients. The carpometacarpal radio determinations were the most internally consistent; global assessment and total erosion + joint space narrowing scores showed the best between-method correlations; and the erosion + joint space narrowing scores depicted most sensitively the progression over time which was not affected by immunomodulating agent or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent therapy. In this study, instructed, non-experienced readers detected rheumatoid radiographic progression utilizing readily available scoring techniques.     

Classifying structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis as progressive or nonprogressive using a composite definition of joint radiographic change: a preliminary proposal

OBJECTIVE: To categorize radiographic joint damage as progressive or nonprogressive in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) participating in clinical studies. METHODS: Using the total Sharp radiographic damage score, erosion score, and joint space narrowing (JSN) score for 751 serial films of the hand/wrist and forefoot obtained from 190 patients with early RA during 6-60 months of followup (mean 31 months), various threshold values for progression of joint damage were evaluated singly and in various combinations. For each patient, the progression rate was estimated from the linear regression line for all available radiographic time points. After preliminary screening, 23 candidate definitions were tested to select a definition that discriminated well between radiographic progression and radiographic nonprogression. RESULTS: The definition selected describes radiographic nonprogression in individual patients as an increase of < or =0.1 in the standardized response mean of the trimmed population (the central 95% of patients) for > or =5 of 6 change measures (erosion scores and JSN scores for the fingers, wrists, and feet). Using this definition, 59% of the 190 patients with early RA were defined as having nonprogressive radiographic damage. Moreover, 95% of 95 patients with progression of the total Sharp score at or below the median and 24% of 95 patients with progression of the total Sharp score above the median were defined as having nonprogressive joint damage (chi(2) = 98, P < 0.0001), as were 97% of patients in the lowest quintile of total Sharp score progression rates and none of the patients in the highest progression quintile. Patients defined as nonprogressors had significantly lower baseline levels of C-reactive protein and lower erythrocyte sedimentation rates compared with patients defined as progressors, and those patients in the nonprogressive joint damage group more frequently had American College of Rheumatology 20% and 50% improvement criteria responses, "good" improvements (decrease of > or =1.2) in the Disease Activity Score, and > or =50% decreases in the swollen joint counts during the first 2 years of followup. CONCLUSION: RA joint damage in an observational cohort can be classified as progressive or nonprogressive with the use of a composite definition. Validation and/or refinement of this definition is needed by utilizing the data from controlled clinical trials that compare placebo with active treatment.     

Radiological outcomes in randomized controlled trials on biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review

Several scores are currently used to estimate the radiologic progression of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Modified Sharp score, Genant-modified Sharp score and van der Heijde-modified Sharp score are actually the most commonly used scores in randomized controlled trials on biologic drugs actually available in scientific literature. An intensive literature search (EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE) was performed in order to identify randomized controlled studies reporting on the efficacy of biologic drugs on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis by means of approved scoring methods such as Sharp score variants. All studies were evaluated for their approach to radiologic outcome, and a global evaluation of trends towards radiologic evaluation was performed. Eighteen studies were identified and analyzed, and data from such randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported and described regarding their approach to radiologic outcomes. The use of three different scoring methodologies generated similar but non-comparable data; although a big part of the studies reported good efficacy profiles of several biologic drugs on radiologic progression, data from such studies are not comparable as the three different scoring methods are not convertible from one to another. At present, there is no standardization for the evaluation of radiologic outcomes, thus preventing comparison of results obtained by different drugs. The use of a single, standardized and widely approved scoring method would grant the possibility of comparing such data.     

Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of 5 methods for scoring hand radiographic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare intrarater and interrater reproducibility and sensitivity to change of 5 scoring methods for radiographic damage on hand radiographs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Radiographs of 22 patients from Norway and France with average 2 years' disease duration at baseline and mean 30 months' followup were assessed by 2 readers according to Larsen, Larsen/Rau, Sharp, Sharp/van der Heijde, and Simple Erosion Narrowing Score (SENS) methods. Reproducibility at baseline and on progression was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman graphs. Sensitivity to change was compared across methods by computing the country-adjusted standardized response means (SRM) ratio. RESULTS: Intrarater reproducibility varied with the reader (ICC ranging from 0.90 to 0.97), with Larsen and Larsen/Rau ranking highest. Interrater reproducibility was highest with Sharp and Sharp/van der Heijde (ICC 0.76 to 0.93). Bland-Altman graphs showed a decrease of concordance in cases of more severe damage. Sensitivity to change was higher with Sharp and Sharp/van der Heijde modified for erosions (SRM ratio 1.44 and 1.70), than with Larsen/Rau and SENS. The differences between Sharp, Sharp/van der Heijde, and Larsen were less for joint space narrowing. There was a significant reader effect (p < 0.05) in all but the Sharp method. Expressed as percentage of the maximum score, the smallest detectable difference varied between 3.5% (Sharp/van der Heijde) and 14.2% (SENS erosion). CONCLUSION: All methods have high intraobserver and interobserver reliability. The interrater reproducibility decreases with disease severity. Recent modified methods perform best to detect changes, but the advantages of SENS seemed to be lost when applied on hand radiographs alone. Training the readers appears to be essential.     

Detecting radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis that are considered important by clinical experts: influence of reading with or without known sequence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether knowledge of the chronological sequence influences the sensitivity and specificity of the Sharp/van der Heijde (SvH) and Larsen/Scott (LS) scoring method to detect clinically important progression of joint damage caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the individual patient and assess whether scoring in chronological order leads to better sensitivity at the cost of lower specificity. METHODS: For both scoring methods, progression scores obtained with (chronological) and without knowledge of the sequence of the films (paired) were compared with the judgment of an international expert panel. This panel assessed whether progression of joint damage seen on films with 1 year intervals was clinically relevant (defined as progression of joint damage that would make clinicians change therapy). The applied thresholds for clinical relevance were (1) the progression scores with the highest accuracy by receiver operating characteristics analyses for the expert opinion, and (2) the smallest progression score that can be detected apart from interobserver measurement error by the scoring method, i.e., the smallest detectable difference (SDD). RESULTS: Progression scores that detected clinically relevant progression most accurately (chronological: 3.0 SvH units and 2.0 LS units; paired: 2.5 SvH units and 1.5 LS units) were smaller than the SDD (chronological 5.0 SvH units and 5.8 LS units; paired 13.8 SvH units and 9.7 LS units). With the SDD as threshold, the sensitivity to detect clinically relevant progression increased significantly from 20 to 60% for the SvH method and from 23 to 33% for the LS method if the sequence of the films was known. The specificity remained good when scoring chronologically: 88% for the SvH and 100% for the LS. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that knowing the chronological sequence leads to an increase in detecting clinically relevant changes in the patient without serious overestimation of nonrelevant differences. Analyzing a clinical trial should be done preferably by reading films in chronological order.     

Reproducibility of multiple-observer scoring of radiologic abnormalities in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Forty-one coded radiographic films from 16 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were read by 13 observers, using 4 different methods for scoring abnormalities. Although absolute scores differed widely among individual observers, correlation coefficients were greater than 0.850 for approximately 2 of 3 comparisons. When films were ranked, using the median rank of all readers, 72% of individual ranks were within 10% of the median ranks. Among serial films on individual patients, 92% of comparisons between early and late films were interpreted as demonstrating progression of abnormalities when mean standardized scores showed an increase in scores of 15 units or greater. Films with lesser changes were interpreted inconsistently. This study shows good general agreement among readers in scoring radiologic abnormalities of hands and wrists, when applied to a film set showing a broad spectrum of severity, and defines the sensitivity of radiologic detection of disease progression.     

Inflammation and damage in an individual joint predict further damage in that joint in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE; Several factors predict joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the context of a trial in early RA, we studied the relationship between clinical signs in individual joints and their propensity to develop progressive damage. METHODS: The COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis) multicenter trial compared the efficacy of prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine against sulfasalazine alone in 155 patients with early RA. Two blinded observers interpreted radiographs in sequence (using the Sharp/Van der Heijde scoring system); in each center, one blinded observer performed clinical assessments every 3 months. The current analysis is based on clinical and radiologic data of the individual metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of 135 patients. Conditional stepwise logistic regression analyzed the relationship between damage (progression) and clinical signs at baseline and followup for each of these joints individually in each patient. RESULTS: Combination therapy strongly retarded the progression of damage. Progression was stronger in patients with rheumatoid factor, HLA-DR4, and high levels of disease activity at baseline. At baseline, 6% of the MCP and PIP joints showed damage; after 1 year, disease had progressed in 10% of these joints. Baseline damage, swelling, or pain in a joint independently and strongly predicted the progression of damage in that joint (P < 0.001). Each additional point in the swelling score (range 0-2) tripled the risk for subsequent progression. Each additional point on the Sharp scale (range 0-8 per joint) and each additional point on the pain scale (range 0-3) doubled the risk. The mean pain and swelling scores over the year were even stronger predictors of damage. CONCLUSION: Local expression of early RA disease activity, both at baseline and at 1-year followup, is strongly related to progression of damage in the individual joint.     

The rheumatoid arthritis articular damage score: first steps in developing a clinical index of long term damage in RA

OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a clinical method for scoring irreversible long term articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The rheumatoid arthritis articular damage score (RAAD score) is based on examination of 35 large and small joints. Concise definitions were formulated to score each joint on a three point scale (0, no irreversible damage; 1, partially damaged; 2, severe damage, ankylosis, or prosthesis). The RAAD score was determined for 121 patients with RA with a large range of disease duration. Interobserver agreement was studied in 39 patients scored by three observers. Data on disease duration, Health Assessment Questionnaire, disease activity score, and Larsen score were collected for 121, 78, 47, and 45 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The RAAD score correlated well with the Larsen score (r(s)=0.81) and disease duration (r(s)=0.68) and (as intended) not with disease activity (r(s)=0.10). Good interobserver agreement was found for total scores and individual joints. The wide range of RAAD scores for patients with the same disease duration suggested good discriminating power, especially after >10 years. CONCLUSION: The RAAD score is a quick and feasible method for measuring the long term articular damage in large RA populations. It has good reliability and construct validity and deserves further study to assess its discriminant validity.     

How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?

Numerous methods for reading abnormalities of rheumatoid arthritis in hand and wrist radiographs have been proposed over the past several decades. There are many differences among these methods, one of the more striking of which is the variation in the number of joints that are scored. In this study, we tested the number of joints that need to be read in order to represent abnormalities accurately and reproducibly, using the scores of multiple observers. Thirteen rheumatologists and radiologists each read a set of 41 hand and wrist films from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ten of 13 readers scored 27 joints in each hand and wrist; the other 3 readers scored fewer areas. Fourteen combinations of joints were selected based on the frequency of involvement and the technical adequacy of routine films in assessing a given area. After testing these 14 different combinations, 1 scheme, which included 17 areas read for erosions and 18 areas read for joint space narrowing, was tested further. The correlation coefficients for 10 intraobserver scores derived from this modified scheme compared with the original scores were between 0.981 and 0.997. Seventy-one of 78 interobserver comparisons were better using the new scheme than using the original scheme. These data indicate that the simplified scheme, using a combination of 17 joints to score erosions and 18 to score joint space narrowing, more accurately reflects the extent of abnormalities perceived by a panel of experts than does the original scheme. This abbreviated number of joints shortens the amount of time required to read a set of films and simplifies the scoring of films, since a number of areas that are difficult to read are eliminated from radiographic assessment.     

Radiography of rheumatoid arthritis in the time of increasing drug effectiveness

Recent clinical development programs for new therapeutic agents in rheumatoid arthritis have included assessment of radiographic progression comparing changes with treatment to placebo and active controls. Studies now use reliable methods of assessment and sufficient study length to detect radiographic changes. Although patient populations and characteristics differ, and radiographic scoring methods vary, the direction of a series of studies appears to indicate that leflunomide (LEF), methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), etanercept, infliximab, and IL-1ra are all effective in retarding radiographic progression, as measured by erosions and joint space narrowing. Interpretation of radiograph data in future trials will be aided by utilization of common reading methods and by continuing comparison across differing rheumatoid arthritis protocol populations.     

Conventional x-ray in early arthritis

This article reviews radiographic data from six cohorts of patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Of the patients, 8% to 15% had erosive disease at the first encounter with the rheumatologist. Classic scoring methods were applied to quantify damage, but baseline damage was low in early inflammatory arthritis. Yearly progression in damage score was assessed only in patients with high suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis at baseline or who had a final diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis at follow-up and varied between 0.5% and 1.7% of the maximal damage of the scoring method per year. The large number of patients with zero values for erosions and lower progression rates will influence sample sizes in clinical trials in early inflammatory arthritis when including radiographic change as an outcome.     

Metodología de presentación de los resultados de progresión radiológica en estudios clínicos

Recent clinical trials that evaluate treatment effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis assess clinical response and progression of structural damage to joints by calculating radiographic progression over a given time period. In this article, we review three important features that have recently been developed in the methodology of scoring progression: presentation of radiographic data in clinical trials, following the preliminary guideline of van der Heijde, established in 2002, and additional new concepts such as estimated yearly progression rates and probability plots.     

Radiographic hand joint space width assessed by computer is a sensitive measure of change in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in the computerized measurement of radiographic hand joint space width (JSW) to changes in modified Sharp scores in a retrospective 2-year study of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: First and last standard clinical hand radiographs of 245 patients with RA were analyzed blind using purpose-written computer software to measure changes in JSW for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in the 3 middle fingers of each hand. Before measurement, the radiographs were scored independently by 2 radiologists using a modification of Sharp scoring. RESULTS: The paired changes in JSW (-0.051 +/- 0.005 mm) and Sharp score (+3.81 +/- 0.50) were both significant over the study duration. In measured joints showing an increase in joint space narrowing (JSN) score, 92% had a corresponding reduction in JSW. In patients with an increase in total score, including JSN and erosion scores in fingers and wrists, 84% had a corresponding reduction in mean (PIP + MCP) JSW. Patients with no change in Sharp score (47%) still experienced a significant reduction in measured JSW (-0.027 +/- 0.006 mm). HLA-DR genetic markers of severe disease progression were associated with significantly greater reductions in JSW but not increases in Sharp score. (Values: mean +/- standard error of mean). CONCLUSION: Measured JSW averaged over 6 PIP and 6 MCP joints was a valid and more sensitive measure of change than total Sharp score in this study of early RA.     

Radiographic imaging: the 'gold standard' for assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by a chronic inflammation of the joints, which leads to the destruction of articular cartilage and bone. The degree of joint damage assessed by radiographic imaging represents a key outcome in RA. There are several methods for scoring the joint damage associated with RA. The most widely used are the Sharp and Larsen systems, as well as more recent modifications of each method. Radiographic imaging has several advantages compared with other outcome measures in RA, specifically: X-rays reflect the history of joint pathology, provide a permanent record for serial evaluation, and can be randomized and blinded for objective scoring. Several modifications of these methods have been proposed and employed in the investigation of disease progression. A review of the radiographic progression of RA is presented, as well as a simplified scoring system useful for the evaluation of joint damage in RA in a clinical setting.     

Prediction of radiographic progression in synovitis-positive joints on maximum intensity projection of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with maximum intensity projection (MRI-MIP) is an easy, useful imaging method to evaluate synovitis in rheumatoid hands. However, the prognosis of synovitis-positive joints on MRI-MIP has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between synovitis visualized by MRI-MIP and joint destruction on X-rays in rheumatoid hands. The wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MP) joints, and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of both hands (500 joints in total) were evaluated in 25 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Synovitis was scored from grade 0 to 2 on the MRI-MIP images. The Sharp/van der Heijde score and Larsen grade were used for radiographic evaluation. The relationships between the MIP score and the progression of radiographic scores and between the MIP score and bone marrow edema on MRI were analyzed using the trend test. As the MIP score increased, the Sharp/van der Heijde score and Larsen grade progressed severely. The rate of bone marrow edema-positive joints also increased with higher MIP scores. MRI-MIP imaging of RA hands is a clinically useful method that allows semi-quantitative evaluation of synovitis with ease and can be used to predict joint destruction.