Halothane 1.5 MAC, isoflurane 1.5 MAC, and the contractile responses of coronary arteries obtained from human hearts

Active vasoconstriction of epicardial coronary arteries can cause myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Relief of vasoconstriction can improve blood flow to the heart. The purpose of this study was to determine if 1.5 MAC halothane and 1.5 MAC isoflurane would each attenuate contractions evoked by three putative mediators of coronary constriction in coronary arteries removed from the hearts of human beings. Hearts were obtained in the operating room from five patients undergoing cardiac transplantation and from six brain-dead patients undergoing organ donation procedures. Coronary arteries were dissected free, cut into rings, and studied in organ chambers. Endothelium-dependent relaxations to 10(-6) M bradykinin were examined; they indicated a variable degree of endothelial dysfunction in vessels used in the experiments. Contractile responses to 40 mM KCl were tested and were used as control contractions. Contractions evoked by serotonin, histamine, and prostaglandin F2 alpha were measured and were expressed as a percent of contractile responses evoked by 40 mM KCl. Halothane depressed the agonist-induced contractions. Maximal contractile responses to serotonin were 130% +/- 28% in untreated rings and 63% +/- 10% in rings exposed to halothane (P less than 0.03). Responses to histamine were 183% +/- 46% untreated and 121% +/- 26% during halothane administration (P less than 0.05), and responses to prostaglandin F2 alpha were 227% +/- 42% untreated and 148% +/- 18% with halothane (P less than 0.05). Isoflurane had no effect on contractions. The results demonstrate that 1.5 MAC halothane, but not 1.5 MAC isoflurane, attenuates contractile responses evoked by putative mediators of coronary vasoconstriction in coronary arteries removed from the hearts of human beings.     

Attenuation of contraction of isolated canine coronary arteries by enflurane and halothane

Contraction of vascular smooth muscle such as that existing in coronary arteries is regulated in part by Ca++ entry into cells via Ca++ channels. Volatile anaesthetics are known to attenuate agonist-induced coronary artery constriction. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if 1.5 MAC concentrations of halothane or enflurane attenuated contractions evoked by activation of one type of Ca++ channel--the potential operator channel. In the current experiment, potential operator channels were activated by depolarizing isolated canine coronary artery rings with high concentration of K+, causing Ca++ entry and vessel contraction. Rings without endothelium were suspended for isometric force measurement in organ chambers containing aerated Krebs-Ringer solution. Maximum response to Ca++ in rings depolarized with K+ was 120 +/- 5 per cent in untreated versus 101 +/- 3 per cent in rings treated with enflurane (P less than 0.01). The maximum response was 123 +/- 6 per cent in untreated versus 111 +/- 5 per cent during halothane administration (P less than 0.05). In contrast, nifedipine 10(-9) M depressed maximum contractions from 114 +/- 5 per cent to 37 +/- 4 per cent (P less than 0.01) and nifedipine 10(-8) M depressed contractions to 30 +/- 4 per cent (P less than 0.01). In a further series of experiments, sustained contractions were depressed by continued administration of the anaesthetics, indicating no loss of anaesthetic effect with time. The results indicate that 1.5 MAC halothane and enflurane attenuate contractions of canine coronary arteries evoked by depolarization and Ca++ entry through potential operated channels. However, neither halothane nor enflurane exhibited the marked depressant effect exerted by nifedipine.     

Isoflurane causes endothelium-dependent inhibition of contractile responses of canine coronary arteries

The authors sought to determine if isoflurane would attenuate effects of three different types of vasoconstrictors on isolated segments of canine epicardial coronary arteries removed from healthy dogs. As the endothelium has a major role in regulating epicardial coronary artery tone, and as it modulates the effect of many vasoactive substances, experiments were conducted both on normal rings and on rings whose endothelium had been mechanically removed. In addition, the endothelium is thought to be damaged in human atherosclerosis. Rings were suspected in organ chambers filled with modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution, aerated with 95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide, and connected to strain gauges for the measurement of isometric tension. Isoflurane 2.3% (1.5 MAC in the dog) was added to the aerating gas mixture in half the preparations, while the other rings served as control. The vasoconstrictors serotonin, phenylephrine, or prostaglandin F2 alpha were added in increasing concentrations to the bath solution. In the presence of endothelium, vasoconstrictor evoked contractions were attenuated by isoflurane. Maximal tension generated by prostaglandin F2 alpha in untreated rings was 114 +/- 18% (mean +/- SEM) of a reference contraction, while, following isoflurane, it was 46 +/- 8% (P less than 0.005). In the absence of endothelium, isoflurane attenuated neither prostaglandin F2 alpha nor serotonin evoked contraction, and had decreased effectiveness against phenylephrine mediated contraction (P less than 0.001). It is concluded that isoflurane attenuates vasoconstrictor-evoked contraction of isolated canine epicardial coronary arteries, and that this effect is mediated by the endothelium.     

Halothane relaxes previously constricted isolated porcine coronary artery segments more than isoflurane

Coronary vasodilation by halothane and isoflurane were compared using in vitro tension recording. Porcine left anterior descending coronary arterial segments (1.5-2.0 mm o.d.) were constricted with either K+ (30 mM) or prostanoid U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) in the absence of other drugs or anesthetics. Following stabilization of constriction, arteries were exposed to halothane or isoflurane at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0% concentrations. K+ (30 mM) induced constriction was reduced by halothane at 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0% and U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) induced constriction was reduced at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0%. K+ (30 mM) induced constriction was reduced by isoflurane only at 3.0% and U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M) induced constriction was reduced by isoflurane only at 2.0 and 3.0%. U44069 induced constriction was more susceptible than K+ induced constriction to relaxation by halothane or isoflurane. Halothane was more potent than isoflurane as a direct relaxant of porcine epicardial left anterior descending arterial segments previously constricted with K+ (30 mM) or U44069 (6 X 10(-7) M).     

The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and hemodynamic effects of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in newborn swine

To determine the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and hemodynamic responses to halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in newborn swine, 36 fasting swine 4-10 days of age were anesthetized with one of the three volatile anesthetics in 100% oxygen. MAC was determined for each swine. Carotid artery and internal jugular catheters were inserted and each swine was allowed to recover for 48 h. After recovery, heart rate (HR), systemic systolic arterial pressure (SAP), and cardiac index (CI) were measured awake and then at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC of the designated anesthetic in random sequence. The (mean +/- SD) MAC for halothane was 0.90 +/- 0.12%; the MAC for isoflurane was 1.48 +/- 0.21%; and the MAC for sevoflurane was 2.12 +/- 0.39%. Awake (mean +/- SD) measurements of HR, SAP, and CI did not differ significantly among the three groups. Compared to the awake HR, the mean HR decreased 35% at 1.5 MAC halothane (P less than 0.001), 19% at 1.5 MAC isoflurane (P less than 0.005), and 31% at 1.5 MAC sevoflurane (P less than 0.005). Compared to awake SAP, mean SAP measurements decreased 46% at 1.5 MAC halothane (P less than 0.001), 43% at 1.5 MAC isoflurane (P less than 0.001), and 36% at 1.5 MAC sevoflurane (P less than 0.005). Mean SAP at 1.0 and 1.5 MAC halothane and isoflurane were significantly less than those measured at equipotent concentrations of sevoflurane (P less than 0.005). Compared to awake CI, mean CI measurements decreased 53% at 1.5 MAC halothane (P less than 0.001) and 43% at 1.5 MAC isoflurane (P less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Inhibitory effects of halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and pentobarbital on the constriction induced by hypocapnia and bicarbonate in isolated canine cerebral arteries

The effects of halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane (0.5, 1 and 2 MAC) and pentobarbital (10(-5) M, 10(-4) M and 3 x 10(-4) M) on hypocapnia- and bicarbonate-induced constriction of isolated dog middle cerebral arteries were investigated in vitro. The isometric tension of isolated cerebral arterial rings was measured in an organ bath containing Krebs bicarbonate solution, aerated with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. Hypocapnia, induced by replacing the bathing solution with one that had been equilibrated with 2.5% CO2 and 97.5% O2, produced a sustained vasoconstriction (268 +/- 36 mg, mean +/- SEM). Exposure of arterial rings to a bathing solution that contained double the concentration of NaHCO3 (50 mM) elicited a phasic constriction followed by a gradual decrease in tension (309 +/- 34 mg). Although halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane attenuated both hypocapnia- and bicarbonate-induced constrictions in a dose-dependent manner, the inhibition of these constrictions was greater in rings treated with halothane than in those treated with isoflurane or sevoflurane when compared at equipotent concentrations. These alkaline-induced constrictions were attenuated by pentobarbital only at the highest concentration of 3 x 10(-4) M. Halothane (1 and 2 MAC) attenuated the constriction induced by hypocapnia to a greater extent than that induced by 15 mM KCl, whereas pentobarbital (10(-4) M and 3 x 10(-4) M) attenuated hypocapnia-induced constriction less than KCl-induced constriction. These results indicate that alkaline-induced constriction is more vulnerable to halothane than other volatile anesthetics and pentobarbital. The mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of halothane and pentobarbital on alkaline-induced cerebral vasoconstriction seem to differ; the inhibitory effect of pentobarbital, but not of halothane may be, in part, ascribed to its inhibitory effect on the Ca++ influx.     

Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on coronary blood flow autoregulation and coronary vascular reserve in the canine heart

To investigate the effects of volatile anesthetics on coronary blood flow (CBF) autoregulation and coronary vascular reserve, studies were performed on chronically instrumented dogs, awake and during the administration of 1.0 MAC halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane. Coronary pressure-flow plots were generated by measuring left anterior descending coronary artery blood flow while varying coronary inflow pressure with a hydraulic occluder. Autoregulation was quantitated by two measures: the slope of the horizontal "autoregulated" portion of the pressure-flow relationship and the autoregulation index (ArI) of Norris. Slope values (ml.min-1.mmHg-1 +/- SD) were: awake, 0.243 +/- 0.043; halothane, 0.414 +/- 0.044; enflurane, 0.587 +/- 0.187; and isoflurane, 0.795 +/- 0.246. The increase in slope was statistically significant only for halothane and isoflurane (P less than .05). The ArI approaches 1.0 when autoregulation is perfect, and approaches zero or is a negative number when autoregulation is absent. The authors found ArI values of: awake, 0.55; halothane, -0.08; enflurane, -0.01; isoflurane, -0.02. These values indicate good autoregulation while awake, but impaired autoregulation with all three anesthetics (P less than .05). Coronary vascular reserve was calculated, at a diastolic coronary pressure of 40 mmHg, as the difference between resting flow and flow during maximal coronary vasodilation induced by intracoronary adenosine. Coronary vascular reserve, maximal coronary conductance, and coronary zero-flow pressure were not significantly altered by these anesthetics. The authors conclude that 1.0 MAC enflurane, halothane, and isoflurane mildly disrupt CBF autoregulation, increasing CBF out of proportion to myocardial demands. Under the conditions of this study, these anesthetics do not affect maximal CBF or coronary vascular reserve.     

Blood flow and tissue oxygen pressures of liver and pancreas in rats: effects of volatile anesthetics and of hemorrhage.

The object of this investigation was to compare the effects of volatile anesthetics and of hemorrhage at comparable arterial blood pressures on splanchnic blood flow (radioactive microspheres) and tissue oxygenation of the liver and pancreas (surface PO2 [PSO2] electrodes). In contrast to earlier studies, we did not use identical minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration multiples as a reference to compare volatile anesthetics; rather, we used the splanchnic perfusion pressure. Under general anesthesia (intravenous chloralose) and controlled ventilation, 12 Sprague-Dawley rats underwent laparotomy to allow access to abdominal organs. Mean arterial pressure was decreased from 84 +/- 3 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM) at control to 50 mm Hg by 1.0 +/- 0.1 vol% halothane, 2.2 +/- 0.2 vol% enflurane, and 2.3 +/- 0.1 vol% isoflurane in a randomized sequence. For hemorrhagic hypotension, blood was withdrawn gradually until a mean arterial pressure of 50 mm Hg was attained. Volatile anesthetics and hemorrhage reduced cardiac output, and hepatic arterial, portal venous, and total hepatic blood flows by comparable degrees. Mean hepatic PSO2 decreased significantly from 30.7 +/- 2.6 mm Hg at control to 17.4 +/- 2 and 17.5 +/- 2 mm Hg during enflurane and isoflurane (each P less than 0.05) anesthesia, respectively. The decrease to 11.5 +/- 2.5 mm Hg was more pronounced during halothane anesthesia. Hemorrhagic hypotension was associated with the lowest hepatic PSO2 (3.4 +/- 1.3 mm Hg) and the highest number of hypoxic (0-5 mm Hg 86%) and anoxic PSO2 values (0 mm Hg 46%). Pancreatic blood flow and oxygenation remained unchanged from control during halothane and enflurane administration, whereas isoflurane increased both variables. Hemorrhagic hypotension slightly reduced pancreatic flow (-8%) but significantly decreased PSO2 from 58 +/- 5 mm Hg at control to 36 +/- 3 mm Hg, with 7% of all measured values in the hypoxic range. Thus, volatile anesthetics preserved pancreatic but not hepatic blood flow and tissue oxygenation in this rat model. Despite comparable effects on perfusion, the PSO2 of the liver and pancreas was the least during hemorrhagic hypotension compared to that with the anesthetics. Because the volative anesthetic-induced hypotension has such a different effect on splanchnic tissue oxygenation compared with hemorrhagic-induced hypotension, the authors conclude that the method of inducing hypotension may have different effects on oxygenation of various tissues.     

Global and regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism during equipotent halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease

Global and regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism were examined in 20 patients with coronary artery disease before surgical stimulation. Half were anesthetized with halothane (0.8%) and half with isoflurane (1.2%). Coronary perfusion pressure decreased similarly in both groups. During halothane anesthesia coronary sinus blood flow, an index of global perfusion, decreased from an awake value of 129 +/- 7 to 97 +/- 7 ml/min (P less than 0.05), and great cardiac vein blood flow, an index of regional perfusion, decreased from 60 +/- 8 to 44 +/- 5 ml/min (P less than 0.05). In contrast, during isoflurane anesthesia global coronary blood flow increased from 131 +/- 13 to 153 +/- 16 ml/min (P less than 0.05), while regional blood flow decreased from 68 +/- 7 to 56 +/- 6 ml/min (P less than 0.05). Thus, the ratio of great cardiac vein blood flow to coronary sinus blood flow was unchanged during halothane anesthesia but decreased significantly during isoflurane. Neither global nor regional coronary vascular resistance was altered by halothane, whereas isoflurane decreased global coronary vascular resistance without affecting regional coronary vascular resistance. All patients receiving halothane had net myocardial lactate extraction. In the isoflurane group, four patients showed global lactate production and three regional lactate production. All patients demonstrating lactate production also developed electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia, which was not present before induction. The authors conclude that halothane is a preferable anesthetic to isoflurane in patients with coronary artery disease because the latter has the propensity to induce maldistribution of the coronary circulation and myocardial ischemia.     

Comparative coronary vascular reactivity and hemodynamics during halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in swine

To assess the dose-response effects of isoflurane and halothane anesthesia on hemodynamics and coronary artery reactivity, the authors studied myocardial hyperemic responses following brief single artery flow arrests in 21 open chest, isocapnic swine in which arterial blood pressures and cardiac outputs were recorded. A specially designed Doppler probe was used to measure the peak and time course of coronary blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) after 15-s LAD occlusions. The ratio of peak velocity of blood flow to resting velocity (coronary reserve), relative repayment of flow debt, and duration of hyperemic responses were studied. Surgery was performed at MAC end-tidal concentrations ([Et]isoflurane = 1.45%. [Et]halothane = 1.25%) of isoflurane (n = 7) or halothane (n = 7), and recordings were made after 15-min steady state [Et]agent at 0.5, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 MAC, and further 0.5 MAC increments until the demise of each animal. To compare coronary reactivity at similar coronary pressures, an aortic snare was used to elevate arterial pressures in a third group of halothane anesthesized pigs (n = 7) to those in the previously studied isoflurane group at each MAC level. There were three major differences between halothane and isoflurane. First, cardiac depression (reduction in arterial pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume) was less with isoflurane compared with halothane anesthesia. Second, with halothane anesthesia, there was a marked decrease in coronary reactivity independent of coronary perfusion pressures with marked, dose-dependent reductions in both coronary reserve and relative flow repayment. During isoflurane anesthesia, coronary reactivity and coronary reserve was well preserved within physiologic limits up to 1.75 MAC [Et]. Third, halothane anesthesized pigs died in cardiac collapse at much lower agent concentrations than with isoflurane (no animals survived 1.75 MAC halothane, whereas all animals survived 2.5 MAC isoflurane). Therefore, pigs anesthesized with isoflurane had greater coronary reserve, better preserved cardiac function, and greater tolerance to increasing agent concentration than pigs anesthesized with halothane.     

Halothane relaxes preconstricted small and medium isolated porcine coronary artery segments more than isoflurane.

To compare the putative vasodilatory effects of isoflurane versus halothane on porcine coronary arteries, we studied the capacity of isoflurane and halothane to relax K(+)-constricted (30 mM) small (0.5-1.0 mm outside diameter [OD]) and medium (1.0-1.5 mm OD) porcine coronary arteries with use of in vitro tension recording. We also examined the effect of the dihydropyridine calcium channel agonist BAY K8644 on previously constricted epicardial porcine coronary artery segments in the presence of halothane or isoflurane. Our purpose was to determine (a) whether anesthetic effect on coronary arteries varied with arterial diameter, and (b) whether halothane and isoflurane inhibited BAY K8644-induced contraction of coronary vessels. Small and medium porcine coronary artery segments were constricted with K+ (30 mM) and the resulting contraction was allowed to stabilize. This was followed by exposure to 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0% isoflurane or halothane and the resultant tension was again measured. Potassium-induced contractions were significantly relaxed by halothane in small coronary artery segments at 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0% and in medium coronary artery segments at 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0%. Potassium-induced contractions were significantly reduced by isoflurane only at 3.0% in both small and medium coronary artery segments. Halothane caused significantly more relaxation of both small and medium porcine coronary arteries previously constricted with K+ (30 mM) than did isoflurane. There were no significant differences in coronary artery response to isoflurane or halothane with respect to coronary artery diameter. These experiments indicate that in porcine coronary arteries greater than 0.5 mm OD, studied in vitro after K(+)-induced contraction, isoflurane was not a potent coronary vasodilator.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the systemic and coronary hemodynamic actions of desflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane in the chronically instrumented dog

The systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of desflurane were compared to those of isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane in chronically instrumented dogs. Since autonomic nervous system function may significantly influence the hemodynamic actions of anesthetics in vivo, a series of experiments also was performed in the presence of pharmacologic blockade of the autonomic nervous system. Eight groups comprising a total of 80 experiments were performed on 10 dogs instrumented for measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressure, the peak rate of increase of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt), subendocardial segment length, coronary blood flow velocity, and cardiac output. Systemic and coronary hemodynamics were recorded in the conscious state and after 30 min equilibration at 1.25 and 1.75 MAC desflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane. Desflurane (+79 +/- 12% change from control) produced greater increases in heart rate than did halothane (+44 +/- 12% change from control) or enflurane (+44 +/- 9% change from control) at 1.75 MAC. Desflurane preserved mean arterial pressure to a greater degree than did equianesthetic concentrations of isoflurane. This result was attributed to a smaller effect on peripheral vascular resistance as compared to isoflurane and greater preservation of myocardial contractility as evaluated by peak positive left ventricular dP/dt and the rate of increase of ventricular pressure at 50 mmHg (dP/dt50) compared to other volatile anesthetics. Increases in diastolic coronary blood flow velocity (+19 +/- 6 and +35 +/- 12% change from control at 1.75 MAC, respectively) and concomitant decreases in diastolic coronary vascular resistance (-41 +/- 12 and -58 +/- 6% change from control at 1.75 MAC, respectively) were produced by desflurane and isoflurane. In the presence of autonomic nervous system blockade, the actions of desflurane and isoflurane were nearly identical with the exception of coronary vasodilation. After autonomic nervous system blockade, isoflurane increased coronary blood flow velocity, but desflurane did not. Furthermore, both desflurane and isoflurane continued to produce less depression of myocardial contractility than did halothane and enflurane. In summary, at equianesthetic concentrations, desflurane and isoflurane produced similar hemodynamic effects; however, in the absence of drugs that inhibit autonomic reflexes, desflurane had less negative inotropic activity and produced less decrease in arterial pressure. The coronary vasodilator actions of desflurane and isoflurane within the limitations of this model were not similar. When the increase in heart rate and rate-pressure product produced by desflurane were prevented in dogs with autonomic nervous system blockade, desflurane produced no change in coronary blood flow velocity.     

Pharmacokinetics of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in pigs

We tested the prediction that the alveolar washin and washout, tissue time constants, and pulmonary recovery (volume of agent recovered during washout relative to the volume taken up during washin) of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane would be defined primarily by their respective solubilities in blood, by their solubilities in tissues, and by their metabolism. We concurrently administered approximately one-third the MAC of each of these anesthetics to five young female swine and determined (separately) their solubilities in pig blood and tissues. The blood/gas partition coefficient of desflurane (0.35 +/- 0.02) was significantly smaller (P less than 0.01) than that of sevoflurane (0.45 +/- 0.02), isoflurane (0.94 +/- 0.05), and halothane (2.54 +/- 0.21). Tissue/blood partition coefficients of desflurane and halothane were smaller than those for the other two anesthetics (P less than 0.05) for all tissue groups. As predicted from their blood solubilities, the order of washin and washout was desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane (most to least rapid). As predicted from tissue solubilities, the tissue time constants for desflurane were smaller than those for sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane. Recovery (normalized to that of isoflurane) of the volume of anesthetic taken up was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) for desflurane (93% +/- 7% [mean +/- SD]) than for halothane (77% +/- 6%), was not different from that of isoflurane (100%), but was less than that for sevoflurane (111% +/- 17%). The lower value for halothane is consistent with its known metabolism, but the lower (than sevoflurane) value for desflurane is at variance with other presently available data for their respective biodegradations.     

Pulsed Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography: comparison of halothane and isoflurane on cardiac function in infants and small children

The combination of two-dimensional and pulsed Doppler echocardiography was used to measure determinants of cardiac function in 20 ASA physical status I infants and small children (9 days-32 months of age) during equipotent halothane (n = 10) or isoflurane (n = 10) anesthesia in oxygen. Five sets of cardiovascular data were recorded in each patient. In the awake, unmedicated state prior to induction, at three different anesthetic levels, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 MAC (corrected for age) and a final measurement repeated at 1.25 MAC after the intravenous infusion of 15 ml X kg-1 of Lactated Ringers solution. The study was completed prior to intubation and surgery. Results are expressed as mean +/- SEM. Isoflurane and halothane decreased mean blood pressure from the awake level (isoflurane 76.6 +/- 2.3 to 60.6 +/- 3.1 mm, halothane 72.2 +/- 3.9 to 60.6 +/- 3.1 mm at 1.25 MAC). Isoflurane increased heart rate at all anesthetic levels (128.7 +/- 4.2 to 142.5 +/- 6.0 beats/min at 0.75 MAC). Halothane decreased heart rate at 1.25 MAC (124.6 +/- 4.6 to 119.4 +/- 3.5 beats/min). Isoflurane and halothane decreased cardiac index at 1.25 MAC. Stroke volume index decreased at 1.0 and 1.25 MAC with both isoflurane (36.9 +/- 3.8 to 30.2 +/- 3.5 ml/m2) and halothane (32.7 +/- 2.5 to 28.9 +/- 2.5 ml/m2). Ejection fractions also decreased significantly at 1.0 and 1.25 MAC in both groups of patients (22 +/- 6% at 1.25 MAC halothane and 28 +/- 8% at 1.25 MAC isoflurane).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of inhalation induction with isoflurane or halothane in children

Thirty-six children (mean age 2.4 years) premedicated with oral chloral hydrate 70 mg kg-1 and atropine 0.03 mg kg-1 were anaesthetized with either 3.75% isoflurane or 2.5% halothane in 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The eyelash reflex disappeared in 39 +/- 7 s (mean +/- SD) with isoflurane and in 56 +/- 16 s with halothane (P less than 0.001). Tachypnoea was seen with both anaesthetics. Coughing, breath holding, stridorous breathing and respiratory depression were seen during isoflurane but not during halothane induction (P less than 0.01). In nine of 20 children anaesthetized with isoflurane, the ventilation had to be assisted before intubation. Endotracheal intubation was possible in 224 +/- 35 s with isoflurane and in 281 +/- 64 s with halothane (P less than 0.01). Intubating conditions were satisfactory in 80% of the children anaesthetized with either volatile agent. Cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation were minimal with both anaesthetics. No cardiac dysrhythmias were noted. Heart rate was higher during isoflurane than during halothane induction. Diastolic arterial pressure was lower during isoflurane than during halothane induction immediately and 5 min after intubation.     

Effects of inhalational anesthetics on verapamil pharmacokinetics in dogs

Six dogs were chronically instrumented in order to collect aortic blood samples and record mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and heart rate. Each animal received verapamil 200 micrograms X kg-1 by 10-min intravenous infusions on four occasions in random sequence: awake, and during halothane 1.2%, enflurane 2.5%, and isoflurane 1.6% anesthesia. Rate of initial distribution of verapamil was reduced during anesthetic exposure. Verapamil intercompartmental clearance from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment was decreased during exposure to halothane and isoflurane, and tended to decrease during enflurane exposure as well. Verapamil terminal volume of distribution at steady-state was reduced by halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane exposure as compared with awake: 65 +/- 10, 80 +/- 9, and 93 +/- 191, respectively, versus 132 +/- 121 (mean +/- SEM; P less than 0.05). Verapamil total clearance was also reduced by halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane as compared with awake: 37 +/- 4, 39 +/- 2 and 41 +/- 31 X h-1, respectively, versus 64 +/- 71 X h-1 (P less than 0.05). Verapamil administered to awake animals resulted in a decrease from baseline in mean arterial pressure; 95 +/- 8 mmHg versus 108 +/- 4 mmHg (P less than 0.05): and an increase in cardiac output; 2.60 +/- 0.33 1 X min-1 versus 1.93 +/- 0.22 1 X min-1 (P less than 0.05). During halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane anesthesia, verapamil administration resulted in a similar decrease in mean arterial pressure; however cardiac output decreased, in contrast to the increase noted in awake animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the direct effects of halothane and isoflurane on large and small coronary arteries isolated from dogs

Relaxant responses to halothane and isoflurane were compared in helical strips of dog epicardial coronary arteries of different sizes: proximal large coronary arteries with outside diameters (OD) larger than 2.5 mm and distal small arteries with 0.7-0.9 mm OD. Responses to pharmacologic vasodilators, including nitroglycerin (NTG) and adenosine, were also studied for comparison. The relaxation induced by halothane in concentrations of 0.8-2.3% and by NTG (10(-9)-10(-5) M) was greater in proximal large coronary arteries than in distal small ones contracted with 20 mM KCl. In contrast, the relaxation by isoflurane (1.2-3.5%) and by adenosine (10(-8)-10(-4) M) was greater in small coronary arteries than in large ones. These results suggest that isoflurane is, like adenosine, preferentially a small artery dilator.     

The effects of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on Ca2+ current and transient outward K+ current in subendocardial and subepicardial myocytes from the rat left ventricle

Halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane abbreviate ventricular action potential duration (APD), and for halothane this effect is greater in the subendocardium than in the subepicardium. In this study we investigated mechanisms underlying the regional effects of these anesthetics on APD. The effect of 0.6 mM halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on the action potential, L-type Ca(2+) current, transient outward K(+) current (I(to)), and steady-state current was recorded in rat left ventricular subendocardial and subepicardial myocytes. Halothane and isoflurane (but not sevoflurane) reduced APD significantly (P < 0.05), more in subendocardial than subepicardial myocytes. Peak L-type Ca(2+) current did not differ between regions and, compared with control, was reduced significantly in both regions by 40% (P < 0.001), 20% (P < 0.001), and 12% (P < 0.01) by halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane, respectively. I(to) was greater in subepicardial (3.95 +/- 0.29 nA) than subendocardial (1.12 +/- 0.05 nA) myocytes. In subepicardial myocytes, peak I(to) was reduced significantly by halothane (P < 0.01) and isoflurane (P < 0.05) (by 8% and 7%, respectively) but was unaffected by sevoflurane. No significant reduction of I(to) was observed in subendocardial myocytes with the three anesthetics. The steady-state current was increased significantly (P < 0.05), but the extent of this increase did not differ between the two regions or among the three anesthetics. Therefore, greater inhibition of I(to) in subepicardial than subendocardial myocytes by halothane and isoflurane could underlie their transmural effects on APD.     

Isoflurane- and Halothane-mediated Dilation of Distal Bronchi in the Rat Depends on the Epithelium

Background: Respiratory epithelium releases substance(s) that can modulate bronchoconstriction in response to constrictive agonists and enhance bronchodilation in response to certain bronchodilators. The hypothesis that the bronchodilatory effect of isoflurane and halothane depends on the epithelium was tested in rat distal bronchial segments.

Methods: Wistar rat bronchial segments of the fourth order (diameter approximately 100 micro meter) were dissected. After preconstriction with 5-hydroxytryptamine, each bronchial segment was exposed to increasing concentrations of 0% to 3% isoflurane or 0% to 3% halothane under four conditions: after epithelial rubbing, after pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG -nitro-L-arginine, after pretreatment with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, or with no preintervention (control). Changes in bronchial diameter were monitored using an in vitro video detection system.

Results: Both isoflurane and halothane produced concentration-dependent bronchodilation (P < 0.001 for either anesthetic; 40% +/- 11% [mean +/- SD] dilation for 3% isoflurane and 57% +/- 10% dilation for 3% halothane). For both anesthetics, bronchodilation was significantly but incompletely attenuated by epithelial rubbing (12% +/- 7% dilation for 3% isoflurane [P < 0.01] and 31% +/- 10% dilation for 3% halothane [P < 0.01]), by pretreatment with indomethacin (20% +/- 8% dilation for 3% isoflurane [P < 0.02] and 21% +/- 9% dilation for 3% halothane [P < 0.001]), or by L-NNA (9% +/- 7% dilation for 3% isoflurane [P < 0.005] and 39% +/- 12% dilation for 3% halothane [P < 0.05]). Epithelial rubbing did not impair nitroprusside-associated bronchodilation.     

Steal-prone coronary anatomy and myocardial ischemia associated with four primary anesthetic agents in humans.

To examine the relationship between myocardial ischemia in patients with steal-prone coronary anatomy and the administration of isoflurane anesthesia, we reviewed coronary angiograms of 955 patients who had participated in a randomized trial of the use of one of four primary anesthetics for coronary artery bypass operations. Steal-prone anatomy was found in 31.8% of patients who had received enflurane; 40.0%, halothane; 32.6%, isoflurane; and 31.7%, sufentanil. Detected by greater than or equal to 0.1 mV ST segment displacement, ischemia during anesthesia occurred in 290 (30.4%) of all patients with no difference in the incidence among the four primary anesthetics (27.5%-32.9%). Patients with steal-prone anatomy did not suffer more ischemia than patients who needed coronary artery bypass surgery but with other varieties of coronary anatomy. In patients with steal-prone coronary anatomy, the incidence of myocardial ischemia by primary anesthetic was 24.0% with enflurane, 34.4% with halothane, 32.1% with isoflurane, and 38.2% with sufentanil. Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg during anesthesia occurred in 416 (45.6%) patients and was twice as common during administration of volatile anesthetics than during that of sufentanil. Hypotension did not increase ischemia frequency in patients with steal-prone anatomy with use of any of the four primary anesthetics including isoflurane. Ischemia was temporally related to hypotension in only 9 patients (0.9%). In none of the 42 patients who had steal-prone anatomy and hypotension during isoflurane anesthesia was ischemia temporally related to hypotension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)