Clinical characteristics of periodontal sites with probing attachment loss following initial periodontal treatment

Abstract Periodontal sites which had undergone probing attachment loss were identified in 16 advanced periodontitis patients subjected to initial periodontal treatment and monitored every 3rd month for 42 months. Many sites with probing attachment loss showed no increase in probing depth and bled on probing at a few of the examinations during maintenance. Others showed increase in depth, frequent bleeding and suppuration. An arbitrary classification of ‘questionable periodontitis’ sites was used and included sites with the following characteristics: probing depth at 42 months 3.5 mm + bleeding on probing at no more than 5 of the 14 examinations 3-42 months + no suppuration on probing 3-42 months. The % sites in this category ranged from 21-35%, depending upon method used to determine probing attachment loss. Widely varying characteristics of sites identified with probing attachment loss were evident for all surface locations and all subgroups of initial probing depth. From a traditional viewpoint, a significant proportion of the losing sites might not have been afflicted with periodontitis. On the other hand, deterioration does not necessarily have to be coupled with obvious inflammation, particularly following therapy.     

Epidemiology of periodontal status in dentate adults in France, 2002-2003

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few recent nationwide studies of the periodontal landscape in European countries have been developed from the point of view of attachment loss and pocket depth. Decision makers are not always in a position to estimate the burden of periodontal disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and the oral distribution of periodontal status among dentate adults in the general population of France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2002-2003, a National Periodontal and Systemic Examination Survey was organized to a stratified quota sample of 2144 adults, aged 35-64 years, nationwide. Participants with six or more teeth were selected from the Health Examination Centers of the National Health Insurance. Measurement of periodontal health was assessed by clinical attachment level and probing depth. RESULTS: A total of 95.40% and 82.23% of adults were found to have clinical attachment loss and periodontal pockets, respectively. Population prevalence estimates indicated that loss of attachment > or = 5 mm is 46.68% and probing depth (> 5 mm) is 10.21%. However, clinical attachment loss of > or = 5 mm occurred in only 0.88 sites in an individual. Periodontal depth pocket generalized forms were as follows: 78% slight, 18% moderate and 4% severe. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed significant differences of attachment loss values between types of tooth (molar, incisors, canines, or premolars). CONCLUSION: Based on the International Classification of Periodontal Diseases, approximately 50% of adults in France may suffer from a severe attachment loss problem. Periodontal pockets are an uncommon condition in France. Significant differences in the prevalence of loss of attachment and probing depth with respect to location of attack have implications in the purchase and development of screening and treatment services.     

Meta-analysis of the effect of scaling and root planing,surgical treatment and antibiotic therapies on periodontal probing depth and attachment loss

OBJECTIVE: This paper reports a meta-analysis of studies that have investigated the effect of scaling and root planing on periodontal probing depth and attachment loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The criteria used for inclusion of studies were as follows: root planing and scaling alone was one of the primary treatment arms; patients or quadrants of each patient were randomly assigned to study groups; 80% of patients enrolled were included in first year follow-up examinations; periodontal probing depth and attachment loss were reported in mm; the sample size of each study and substudy was reported. Sample size was used to weight the relative contribution of each study since standard errors were not reported by many studies and sample size is highly correlated with standard error and therefore statistically able to explain a substantial portion of the standard error on studies that use similar measures. RESULTS: The meta-analysis results show that periodontal probing depth and gain of attachment level do not improve significantly following root planing and scaling for patients with shallow initial periodontal probing depths. However, there was about a 1-mm reduction for medium initial periodontal probing depths and a 2-mm reduction for deep initial periodontal probing depths. Similarly, there was about a 0.50-mm gain in attachment for medium initial periodontal probing depth measurements and slightly more than a l-mm gain in attachment for deep initial periodontal probing depth measurements. Surgical therapy for patients with deep initial probing depths showed better results than scaling and root planing in reducing probing depths. When patients were followed up over 3 years or more, these differences were reduced to less than 0.4 mm. Antibiotic therapy showed similar results to scaling and root planing. However, a consistent improvement in periodontal probing depth and gain of attachment is demonstrated when local antibiotic therapy is combined with root planing and scaling.     

Evaluating the merits of option-3 methods in relative attachment level measurement in a healthy population

Attachment loss is the principal clinical indicator for periodontal disease progression. However, the attachment measurement can be inaccurate due to outliers. A remedial scheme, the option-3 scheme, has been suggested in the literature. This scheme involves first measuring the relative attachment twice at any given site. A third measurement is required if there is a large disagreement between the first two probings. When the third measurement is taken, there are several possible ways to make the final assessment of the true attachment level. Among them are the average of the 3 measurements, the average of the closest 2, and the median of the 3. This report evaluates the merits of the option-3 scheme by comparing it with other schemes to reduce measurement variance and outliers. Since true attachment levels are unknown, we chose to check accuracy through measurement consistency between visits in healthy subjects using the fact that such subjects should have little real change in attachment levels. 12 healthy subjects participated in the study. They visited the clinic 4 times in 4 months. Two types of the Florida stent probe were used by 2 calibrated examiners. It was found that option-3 schemes were more accurate than a single probing or duplicate probings in estimating the relative attachment level. The 3 final assessment schemes performed almost equally well from a practical standpoint, but the median was the best among them in a statistical sense.     

Decision making in periodontal therapy

7 patients completed 2 years of observation following initial therapy. Triplicate probing measurements were used to identify sites with greater than or equal to 1 mm of probing attachment change between any 2 of the following time points; immediately pre-instrumentation; immediately post-instrumentation; 3 months; 12 months and 24 months. 24% of sites lost probing attachment directly due to instrumentation. 12% of sites lost probing attachment at 24 months compared to pre-instrumentation, but over 1/3 of these lost attachment at the time of instrumentation. 47 sites lost probing attachment from post-instrumentation to 24 months. 22 of these sites were shallow buccal or lingual sites and their attachment apparatus may have remodelled. The initially deeper of these sites displayed other clinical features more consistent with inflammatory periodontitis. Sites that initially gained probing attachment due to treatment but which later lost were identified. These sites may have had a reversal of the enhanced epithelial adaption. 17 other patients were monitored over a period of 3 1/2 years and sites losing probing attachment were identified using linear analysis of regression. The diagnostic predictability of clinical signs to reveal probing attachment loss at 3 1/2 years was calculated. In general, predictability values improved with increasing time interval. Increase in probing depth, particularly if combined with a high frequency of bleeding, showed the highest predictability. The effect of therapy on probing attachment levels should be considered in the identification of sites with probing attachment loss. Persistent bleeding, combined with high residual probing depths or increase in probing depth, may be a useful adjunct to probing attachment loss in identifying diseased sites.     

Relationship of clinical parameters to attachment loss in subsets of subjects with destructive periodontal diseases

23 subjects were followed prior to treatment for 5 to 12 months in an attempt to relate attachment loss during this period to attachment level, probing depth, gingival redness and bleeding on probing. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on amount and distribution of prior attachment loss: minor periodontitis, predominantly molar periodontitis and generalized periodontitis. The % of sites that exhibited attachment loss during the study period in the minor periodontitis, predominantly molar periodontitis and generalized periodontitis groups, were 1.3, 8.1 and 5.4, respectively. Subjects with minor periodontitis and predominantly molar periodontitis exhibited attachment loss more frequently in molar sites, proximal sites and sites with attachment level greater than or equal to 4 mm. In subjects with generalized periodontitis, attachment loss was related to tooth surface and attachment level, but not to tooth type. The relationship between the clinical parameters and attachment loss was improved compared with previous studies by using more homogeneous subject groups, more sensitive methods of analyzing attachment change and multivariate data analysis. However, the clinical parameters could not be used as diagnostic tests to predict attachment loss at individual sites.     

Sustained release of doxycycline for the treatment of peri-implantitis: randomised controlled trial

With the increased use of osseointegrated implants and with many implants functioning for a long time, the treatment of peri-implantitis has become important. Animal studies and clinical case reports have shown that the principle of guided bone regeneration can be applied to the surgical treatment of moderate to profound loss of bone around the implant, but we have found no published clinical studies. Patients and methods: Twenty-eight patients whose ages ranged from 25 to 78 years and who had a total of 48 peri-implant defects were examined at baseline (week 0) and after 18 weeks. This included the recording of bleeding on probing, pocket probing depths, and probing attachment levels at six sites for each tooth. For 2-18 weeks before week 0 all patients had been treated for peri-implantitis, including motivation, instruction in oral hygiene, and implant scaling with a hand plastic instrument. They were then randomly allocated to continue with this treatment or to have in addition mechanical debridement and local application of Atridox trade mark which slowly release doxycycline. Results: Patients treated with Atridox trade mark showed a significantly greater gain in mean (S.D.) probing attachment levels than those not treated with Atridox. Only subjects treated with Atridox had a significant gain in mean bleeding on probing (P = 0.001). Application of the biodegradable sustained release device after initial periodontal treatment resulted in a significant gain in mean probing attachment levels in the Atridox trade mark group and a significant reduction in pocket probing depths. There was also a significant difference in mean probing attachment levels (0.6mm).     

The relative effects of therapy and periodontal disease on loss of probing attachment after root debridement

This study investigated the immediate effects, and the effects during 12 months, of a single episode of root debridement in 1248 sites in 9 periodontitis patients. Single recordings for probing depths and probing attachment levels were made at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In addition, triplicate recordings of attachment levels were made for all sites by 3 independent examiners immediately prior to debridement, immediately post debridement, and at 3 and 12 months. It was found that a mean loss of probing attachment of 0.5 to 0.6 mm occurred as a result of instrumentation, irrespective of initial probing depth. Individual sites were identified as having lost probing attachment using a site-specific standard deviation for measurement variability and a greater than or equal to 1.0 mm change. 5% of all sites lost probing attachment from pre-instrumentation to 12 months. Approximately half of these had probing attachment loss inflicted during instrumentation. 23 sites (2% of all sites) were identified as having lost probing attachment from the post-instrumentation time point to 12 months. The majority of these sites seemed to undergo this probing attachment loss as a result of a remodelling process during the healing phase. Over the observation period used in this study, the majority of the attachment loss identified seems to be either directly attributable to instrumentation or to a remodelling process as a result of the therapy rather than to progressive periodontitis.     

Periodontal probing: What does it mean?

Abstract The periodontal probe has been and continues to be used as an important diagnostic instrument by the dental profession. The measurements recorded with the probe have generally been considered to represent a reasonably accurate estimate of sulcus or pocket depth. Recent reports on the histopathology of the periodontal lesion and the histological features of a healing lesion, together with histological studies on the relationship of the probe to periodontal tissues, have shed some new light on periodontal probing. It is now apparent that probing depth measured from the gingival margin seldom corresponds to sulcus or pocket depth. The discrepancy is least in the absence of inflammatory changes and increases with increasing degrees of inflammation. In the presence of periodontitis the probe tip passes through the inflamed tissues to stop at the level of the most coronal intact dento-gingival fibers, approximately 0.3–0.5 mm apical to the apical termination of the junctional epithelium. Decreased probing depth measurements following periodontal therapy may be due in part to decreased penetrability of the gingival tissues by the probe. Following treatment aimed at obtaining new attachment in periodontal defects, wider variations may occur between the location of the probe tip and the most coronal dento-gingival fibers than in the case of untreated sites. This is due in part to the formation of a so-called “long” junctional epithelium. In the absence of inflammation this epithelium may not be penetrable during ordinary probing, but could account for a rapid increase in probing depth measurements when inflammatory changes allow the probe to traverse the epithelium and/or the adjacent infiltrated connective tissue. In view of the difficulty inherent in relating periodontal probing measurements to actual sulcus or pocket depth, the interpretation of periodontal probing in the practice of periodontics may need reappraisal.     

����̽��͵�������̽��

牙周组织附着水平的探查是牙周疾病诊断的金标准，传统的手用探诊方法由于影响因素较多，尤其是探诊力量难以标准化，使探诊结果存在一定的误差。电子牙周探针将固定的探诊压力、精确的电子化测量和储存数据于电脑中几个特点融为一体，可以直观地将数据展现给患者和同行，对临床、教学和科研工作都具有实用价值。     

Relationship of cigarette smoking to attachment level profiles

OBJECTIVES: The present investigation examined clinical features of periodontal disease and patterns of attachment loss in adult periodontitis subjects who were current, past or never smokers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 289 adult periodontitis subjects ranging in age from 20-86 years with at least 20 teeth and at least 4 sites with pocket depth and/or attachment level >4 mm were recruited. Smoking history was obtained using a questionnaire. Measures of plaque accumulation, overt gingivitis, bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing pocket depth and probing attachment level were taken at 6 sites per tooth at all teeth excluding 3rd molars at a baseline visit. Subjects were subset according to smoking history into never, past and current smokers and for certain analyses into age categories <41, 41-49, >49. Uni- and multi-variate analyses examined associations between smoking category, age and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Current smokers had significantly more attachment loss, missing teeth, deeper pockets and fewer sites exhibiting bleeding on probing than past or never smokers. Current smokers had greater attachment loss than past or never smokers whether the subjects had mild, moderate or severe initial attachment loss. Increasing age and smoking status were independently significantly related to mean attachment level and the effect of these parameters was additive. Mean attachment level in non smokers <41 years and current smokers >49 years was 2.49 and 4.10 mm respectively. Stepwise multiple linear regression indicated that age, pack years and being a current smoker were strongly associated with mean attachment level. Full mouth attachment level profiles indicated that smokers had more attachment loss than never smokers particularly at maxillary lingual sites and at lower anterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: In accord with other studies, smokers had evidence of more severe periodontal disease than past or never smokers. At all levels of mean attachment loss, smokers exhibited more disease than never smokers. Difference in mean attachment level between smokers and never smokers at individual sites was not uniform. Significantly more loss was observed at maxillary lingual sites and lower anterior teeth suggesting the possibility of a local effect of cigarette smoking.     

Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy

Individual sites with gain and loss of probing attachment were identified amongst 1688 proximal sites in non-molar teeth from 49 patients monitored for 24 months following oral hygiene instruction and root debridement. The distribution of sites with gain and loss of probing attachment was studied within each of the 49 subjects, for each of the 10 different tooth types treated, for teeth with and without root canal fillings, for mesial and distal surfaces, and for surfaces with and without the presence of root concavity/furcation involvement. Similarly, sites with gain and loss were related to the following measurements of the severity of the initial lesion: initial probing depth, radiographic bone score, depth of radiographic intraosseous defect, and radiographically widened periodontal ligament. The analyses indicated that subjects with a higher proportion of sites with probing attachment gain tended to have a lower proportion of sites with probing attachment loss. Sites with deep initial probing depth demonstrated a high incidence of gain and a low incidence of loss of probing attachment. All other investigated characteristics showed weak or no association with probing attachment change following therapy. This report indicates that the 24-month outcome of plaque control and root debridement in proximal surfaces of non-molar teeth is not compromised by the severity of the initial soft tissue or bony lesion.     

Factors associated with different responses to periodontal therapy

Abstract. In a study of the efficacy of modified Widman flap surgery and scaling and root planing accompanied by 1 of 4 systemic adjunctive agents, Augmentin, tetracycline, ibuprofen or placebo, it was observed that subjects differed in their response to therapy. The difference was only partially accounted for by the adjunctive agent employed. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine clinical and microbiological features in subjects who showed different levels of attachment change post-therapy. 40 subjects were subset into 3 groups based on mean attachment level change post-therapy. 10 poor response subjects showed mean attachment loss; 19 moderate response subjects showed mean attachment gain between 0.02-0.5 mm and 11 good response subjects showed a mean gain of attachment >0.5 mm. Clinical parameters were measured at 6 sites per tooth both pre- and post-therapy. Microbiological samples were taken from the mesial aspect of each tooth and evaluated individually for their content of 14 subgingival taxa using a colony lift method and DNA probes. % of sites colonized by each species was computed for each subject both pre- and post-therapy. Significant differences were observed among treatment response groups for mean probing pocket depth, attachment level and % of sites with plaque pre-therapy. The poor response subjects had the lowest mean probing pocket depth and attachment level, but the highest plaque levels. Post-therapy, the poor response group exhibited the greatest degree of gingival inflammation as assessed by gingival redness and bleeding on probing. Subjects in the good response group showed decreases in the % of sites colonized for 9 of 14 test species, while subjects in the poor response group showed an increase in % of sites colonized for 12 species. The differences in change in % of sites colonized among groups were significant for B. forsythus and P. gingivalis. The majority of attachment loss in poor response subjects occurred at sites with pre-therapy probing pocket depths 4 mm. Subjects with moderate or good treatment responses had fewer shallow or moderate sites showing attachment loss and a large proportion of sites in all probing pocket depth categories showing attachment gain. Sites that lost attachment ≥2 mm post-therapy showed a significant increase in counts of P. intermedia, B. forsythus and A, actinomycetemcomitans b, while sites that gained attachment showed a decrease in these species. The data indicated that subjects who showed a good treatment response exhibited a decrease in the level of gingival inflammation and a marked reduction in the % of sites colonized by suspected periodontal pathogens. In subjects showing a poor treatment response, the level of gingival inflammation was not decreased and levels of periodontal pathogens increased.     

Periodontal maintenance

The main goal of periodontal therapy is to establish an oral environment compatible with periodontal health by the physical disruption of the plaque biofilm and adjunctive chemical means if required. Implicit in this objective is the ongoing requirement of detection and interception of new and recurrent disease, which continues at selected intervals for the life of the dentition after the initial ("active") phase of periodontal treatment. This concept of ongoing periodontal maintenance therapy has been embraced as the mandatory requirement for favourable periodontal outcomes based on institutional clinical trials and in practice-based studies in various parts of the world. This review examines the ramifications of periodontal maintenance therapy based upon a multi-level assessment of logistic issues and risk factors at three levels: (1) The patient level – treatment time; patient attendance compliance; and homecare measures, antiseptics/antibiotics and smoking. (2) The level of the individual tooth – tooth loss; and evaluation of success versus survival. (3) The level of each tooth surface ("site") – probing depth, loss of attachment and bleeding on probing; and changes in clinical attachment levels. In spite of the diversity of studies conducted, there is agreement on the efficacy of periodontal maintenance therapy when compared with studies on untreated populations and in treated cases that were not maintained.     

Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements

4 probing designs have been employed to investigate the reproducibility of the Florida Probe. 3 groups (each composed of 10 subjects) were selected for the study: healthy adults, gingivitis subjects, and periodontitis subjects. The 4 probing designs were as follows: (a) the probe tip was left in the sulcus between successive probings; (b) the probe tip was removed from the gingival margin between probings but the next probing followed immediately; (c) successive whole-mouth probings were interrupted by a 5-min interval and a mouthrinse; (d) there was a 4-week interval between each probing. 3 measurements were taken for each design. The main purpose of this study was to identify variance components in the attachment level variation. The maximum probing error standard deviation was found to be around 0.3 mm, which is considerably smaller than that found in most previous studies. The errors associated with the periodontal condition and probing effect were also estimated. The variance components obtained here can be used for determining the sample size in controlled clinical studies.     

Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe®

Abstract Clinical assessment of the progression of periodontitis is based on the measurement of periodontal probing attachment levels over time. In calculating these changes, duplicate measurements from fixed reference points, including cemento-enamel junctions and acrylic stents, have been used to assist in detecting progressive disease. The Florida Probe® has been previously shown to improve the reproducibility of these measurements when used with an acrylic stent. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of 2 models of the Florida Probe®, the original stent model and the modified disk model, in measuring attachment level. The disk probe differs from the stent probe in that it uses the occlusal surface of the tooth as a static reference point in calculating changes in attachment level measurements. In 10 subjects, sites were probed 2 × by 2 examiners using both types of probe. Standard deviations and intra- and inter-examiner correlations were calculated. These results demonstrate that the new disk probe yields reproducible measurements similar to the stent probe and is therefore suitable for use in longitudinal clinical studies.     

Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy

Incisors, cuspids and premolars in 49 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were treated with initial, non-surgical periodontal therapy. The results were monitored by probing attachment level measurements at 6 sites of each tooth every 3rd month during a period of 24 months. A series of 9 probing attachment level measurements for each site was subjected to linear regression analysis. The slope of the regression line, the projected probing attachment loss during the 24-month interval (delta y) and the probability level of the slope were calculated for each site. 2 groups of sites with probing attachment loss were identified: group 1: sites with delta y greater than 1.5 mm and p less than 0.05; group 2: sites with delta y greater than 1.0 mm and p less than 0.05. Group 1 included 120 sites (5%) and group 2 included 265 sites (10%) of the total of 2532 available sites. In both groups, probing attachment loss was more frequently noticed for sites with an initial probing depth less than or equal to 3.5 mm than for sites with initial probing depth greater than or equal to 7.0 mm. The finding that the majority of sites with probing, attachment loss was found amongst initially shallow or moderately deep lesions may indicate attachment loss due to trauma associated with therapy rather than loss as a result of a continuing, inflammatory disease process.     

Possible association of periodontal disease with oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review

Abstract

Background: Periodontitis has been associated with several systemic diseases and medical conditions, including oral cancer (OC). However, most studies reporting an association between OC and periodontal disease have used different clinical and radiographic criteria to define periodontal disease. This review aimed to evaluate the currently available evidence to determine an association between periodontal disease (extension and severity), OC, and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs).

Material and methods: A systematic search of studies published up to August 2018 was performed following the PRISMA guidelines in the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed) and COCHRANE (OVID). A methodological evaluation was made using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

Results: Eight studies (case-control, cross-sectional and cohort) were included. An increased clinical attachment loss, plaque index, bleeding on probing, and radiographic bone loss was found in patients with OC and OPMDs. Differences in the methodological characteristics, case definition used for periodontal diseases, and OC location did not allow estimating the odds ratio required to conduct a meta-analysis.

Conclusion: Some studies suggest a positive relationship between periodontal disease, OC, and OPMDs; however, the currently available evidence is insufficient to draw solid conclusions.     

Is loss of attachment due to root planning and scaling in sites with minimal probing depths a statistical or real occurrence?

BACKGROUND: Following root planing and scaling many studies have implied an association between a loss of clinical attachment at sites with initially shallow pockets (1 to 3 mm) and gains in attachment level for deeper probing depths. However, these effects are also consistent with a statistical phenomenon referred to as regression towards the mean. This principle suggests that extreme values will moderate the next time they are recorded. The purpose of this report was to estimate the effect that regression towards the mean has on perceived changes in attachment level after root planing and scaling. METHODS: During the initial examination, 2 different investigators conducted 2 full-mouth probings. Two quadrants were randomly selected to be root planed and scaled until the root surfaces were smooth by tactile touch of an explorer. The 2 remaining quadrants were not treated. At 4 to 6 weeks after treatment, another full mouth probing was done. An examiner who was blind to the quadrants that had been scaled measured attachment level and probing depth after therapy. This study design provided periodontal measurements before and after root planing and scaling, measurements before and after a period of 4 to 6 weeks of no therapy, and duplicate measurements at the beginning of the study. RESULTS: Using the repeat examination when no true change could occur, shallow sites (< or =3 mm of probing depth) showed average negative differences between repeat attachment level measurements (-0.23 mm), which mimicked loss of periodontal attachment. Deep sites, (>6 mm) showed average positive values (0.40) mimicking gain in attachment level. These results suggest that regression towards the mean is a significant effect in this data set. Both shallow non-scaled and scaled sites had similar differences in repeat measures (-0.28 mm, -0.25 mm) which were also similar to and not statistically different from changes after therapy for both non-scaled (-0.21 mm) and scaled sites (-0.08 mm). Thus not only does this data set exhibit regression towards the mean, but it explains the majority of perceived loss of periodontal attachment after scaling at sites that have minimal probing depth. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the majority of perceived loss of attachment due to scaling at sites of minimal probing depth that have been reported in many studies may be due a statistical phenomenon called regression towards the mean.     

Scores of plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth to predict probing attachment loss 5 years of observation following nonsurgical periodontal therapy

The purpose of the present study was to determine the diagnostic value of clinical scores of supragingival plaque, bleeding, suppuration and probing depth to predict probing attachment loss in patients on maintenance following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Non-molar teeth in 39 subjects were monitored and the above scores were repeatedly obtained throughout 5 years of observation following initial treatment. Probing attachment loss between 0-60 months was determined by a combination of linear regression analysis and end-point analysis. The results revealed that all the investigated scores were associated with probing attachment loss. This association was demonstrated by improved diagnostic predictability along with increased frequency or magnitude of the various scores. Also, the diagnostic predictability improved with increase in length of time for recording of the scores. The diagnostic predictability of either accumulated plaque scores and accumulated bleeding scores reached a maximum of about 30%. Residual probing depth greater than or equal to 7 mm reached a predictability of around 50% and increase in probing depth greater than or equal to 1.0 mm reached about 80% after 60 months. Thus, of the clinical scores investigated, increase in probing depth was found to be most valuable in predicting probing attachment loss.