Comparison of complications between transjugular and axillosubclavian approach for placement of tunneled, central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: a prospective study

This study was designed to compare the incidence of mechanical, thrombotic and infective complications in transjugular (IJV) and axillosubclavian (SCV) central venous catheters (CVC) in patients with hematological malignancy. In a prospective observational trial, 131 consecutive patients were classified into two groups: Group A included those with IJV catheter insertions under sonography guidance (n=61) and group B included those with SCV insertions under venography guidance (n=70). After catheter placement, patients were prospectively acquired and recorded to obtain the following data: success rates, total catheter days, and complication episodes per 100 catheter days. All procedures were technically successful. Total catheter days were 7800 (group A) versus 8391(group B). Mechanical complications were observed in three cases from group A and 11 from group B, with an incidence rate of 0.04 per 100 catheter days versus 0.13 (P=0.043), respectively. Two symptomatic thrombotic complications were observed in group B. The number of infective complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.312). There was no difference in infective complication incidence between the two groups. To minimize catheter-related mechanical and thrombotic complications, however, the IJV approach is superior to the SCV approach.     

Use of the right external jugular vein as the preferred access site when the right internal jugular vein is not usable

PURPOSE: The present study describes the authors' experience with central venous access through the right external jugular vein (EJV) when the right internal jugular vein (IJV) is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 23 patients in whom a central venous catheter placement was attempted via the right EJV was conducted. The reasons for catheterization via the right EJV included clinically silent occlusion of the right IJV (n = 17), localized skin infection overlying the right IJV related to a previous catheterization (n = 3), presence of an existing Hickman catheter in the right IJV (n = 1), and concern regarding the risk of catheter-related infection secondary to right IJV catheterization in patients with a tracheostomy tube device adjacent to the presumed site of right IJV catheterization (n = 2). Technical success, procedural complications, and follow-up results including catheter dwell time and delayed or late complications (eg, symptomatic venous thrombosis, catheter-related infection, and catheter malfunction) were assessed. Adverse events were expressed as events per 100 catheter-days of use. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 22 of 23 patients (96%). There were no procedural complications. The catheter dwell time ranged from 2 to 182 days, with a mean dwell time of 62.7 days. There were four delayed or late complications (three catheter-related infections, 0.22 per 100 catheter-days; one catheter malfunction, 0.07 per 100 catheter-days). No cases of symptomatic venous thrombosis were noted. CONCLUSION: The right EJV is an acceptable and preferred access site when the right IJV is not available for central venous catheterization.     

Impact of short-term hemodialysis catheters on the central veins: a catheter venographic study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of pericatheter sleeve formation, thrombus formation, and stenosis of the central veins in hemodialysis patients with temporary catheters. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In this prospective study, 57 patients (40 males, 17 females) with temporary dialysis catheters had catheter venography by pulling back the catheter just before removal. Patient's age range was 25-87 years (mean age, 51 years). The venographic studies were evaluated for pericatheter sleeve formation, thrombus formation, and stenosis of the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) and the superior vena cava (SVC). The IJV could only be evaluated if there was adequate filling during contrast administration. In a subgroup of patients who had had only right IJV or only right SCV catheters, impact of these catheters on the central veins was compared. RESULTS: The catheter location was right internal jugular vein (IJV) in 26 cases, right subclavian vein (SCV) in 27 cases, left IJV in 1 case, and left SCV in 3 cases. Thirty-two patients (56%) had had only one temporary catheter and the rest had had more than one inserted. The mean dwell time for the catheters was 21 days (range 7-59 days). A pericatheter sleeve was detected on venography in 32 (56%) patients and thrombus formation was noted in 16 patients (28%). A total of 41 patients (72%) exhibited pericatheter sleeve and/or thrombus formation. While 19 of the 32 patients (59%) without previous catheterization had a sleeve around the catheter, only 13 (52%) of 25 patients who had had multiple catheters inserted had a sleeve (P > 0.005). Of the eight patients (14%) with BCV stenosis, two had >50% stenosis. Only one patient (2%) had mild stenosis of the SVC. Three patients out of 15 (20%) who had diagnostic venography for the IJV had severe stenosis of the vein. Pericatheter sleeve formation was more frequent in women (P < 0.005). However, there were no statistical differences with respect to pericatheter sleeve formation, luminal filling defect and BCV stenosis when patients were grouped according to age, dwell time of the catheter, number of catheters inserted, and diameter of the SVC. Forty-two of the fifty-seven patients had had only right IJV (n =16) or right SCV (n = 26) catheters. There were no differences between these groups with respect to rates of pericatheter sleeve formation, thrombus formation, or BCV stenosis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that even short-term catheters result in significantly high rates of pericatheter sleeve and thrombus formation which are two of the important causes of catheter malfunction. The IJV route is known to be much safer than the SCV route with respect to stenosis formation in the vein in which the catheter is inserted; however, the result showed no differences between the two routes with respect to frequencies of pericatheter sleeve formation, thrombus formation, and BCV stenosis. These findings remind us again that we should avoid unnecessary catheter insertion even for short-term in these chronically ill patients.     

Internal jugular vein thrombosis associated with hemodialysis catheters

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of internal jugular vein thrombosis among patients undergoing hemodialysis in whom tunneled dialysis catheters were placed by interventional radiologists and to evaluate potential risk factors for thrombosis, such as the number of catheters inserted per patient through the right internal jugular vein, catheter type and material, total catheter days, and catheter-associated infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the right internal jugular vein was performed by interventional radiologists in 143 patients with a history of dialysis catheter placement. The examination focused on the detection of right internal jugular vein thrombosis, with or without occlusion. Total catheter days, catheter type, and catheter-related complications, most notably infection, were evaluated with database analysis for possible association with subsequent development of thrombosis. Statistical analysis of potential risk factors was performed with logistic regression models and chi2 tests. RESULTS: Evidence of right internal jugular vein thrombosis was present in 25.9% of the patients enrolled in the study. Among the veins with thrombosis, 62% were occluded. Only the mean number of catheters placed in the right internal jugular vein per patient was significant below the level of P =.20; therefore, a multivariate logistic regression model was not used. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of internal jugular thrombosis, both complete and incomplete, was higher in the study population than previously reported. The risk factors that were analyzed demonstrated no statistically significant association with development of thrombosis.     

Conversion of indwelling chest port catheters to tunneled central venous catheters

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the conversion of subcutaneous chest wall infusion ports to tunneled central venous catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a period of 34 months, 67 patients were referred for conversion of indwelling subcutaneous chest wall ports to tunneled central venous catheters as part of a bone marrow transplant protocol. Six patients were deemed unacceptable for conversion and the remaining 61 underwent successful conversion. All patients had functioning surgically placed single-lumen (n = 50) or double-lumen (n = 11) chest ports, which were removed to maintain the original venous access sites for placement of a tunneled central venous catheter, incorporating the chest wall pocket for tunneling, in 46 patients (75%). A new tunnel was created in the other 15 patients. There were no immediate complications and all patients were followed until catheter removal or patient demise with the catheter in place. RESULTS: 57 of 61 (93%) catheters were used without evidence of infection for 23-164 days (mean, 57 d) after placement. Two (3%) were removed (both at 26 days) because of persistent neutropenic fever without physical signs or laboratory evidence of catheter infection, and two (3%) were removed (at 11 and 77 days) because of proven catheter infection, yielding an overall infection rate of 1.2 per 1,000 catheter days. Two catheters required exchange and two required stripping because of decreased function, resulting in an overall catheter-related complication rate of 2.4 per 1,000 catheter days. CONCLUSIONS: Indwelling subcutaneous chest wall infusion ports can be safely converted to tunneled central venous catheters, even in an immunocompromised patient population, with a low risk of complications such as infection.     

Retrospective assessment of risk factors to predict tunneled hemodialysis catheter outcome

PURPOSE: To identify factors that may influence the function, outcome, and complications associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiology reports and hemodialysis, medical, and Clinical Information System (computerized patient medical record system) records were retrospectively reviewed in 221 consecutive patients who underwent tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists between January 11, 1996 and January 13, 2000 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Various patient characteristics (diabetes, smoking, hypertension, age, sex, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, history of cardiac catheterization, coumadin use, functional status, and obesity) were assessed for their relationship to the outcome of hemodialysis catheters. Catheter outcome was examined by calculating infection rate, thrombosis rate, fibrin formation rate, mechanical malfunction rate, and total complication rate. With these patient characteristics and outcome variables, multiple regression analysis was performed with STATA (College Station, TX) statistical analysis software. RESULTS: Of the 221 patients reviewed, 39 patients were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 182 patients, 427 catheters were placed for a total number of 36994 catheter-days. For overall complication rate, multiple regression analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation only for hypertension (P =.032). Total complication rate was 0.76 events per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: 0.53-1.00) for patients with a documented history of hypertension and 0.27 events per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: 0.08-0.45) for patients without (P =.024, paired student t test). For patients with diabetes versus patients without, the infection rates were 0.34 episodes per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: 0.15-0.53) and 0.12 episodes per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: 0.06-0.18), respectively, (P =.011, paired student t test). Thrombosis rate for patients on coumadin was 0.13 events per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: -0.14-0.40), while thrombosis rate for patients not taking coumadin was 0.03 events per 100 catheter-days (95% CI: 0-0.05) (P =.036, paired student t test). CONCLUSION: Hypertension is a risk factor for poor outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters as measured by total complication rate requiring catheter removal or exchange. In this retrospective study, no other specific risk factors predicted an increased need for removal or exchange of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.     

Radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in occluded neck, chest, or small thyrocervical collateral veins in central venous occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate interventional radiologic placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in small thyrocervical collateral veins or in occluded veins in the neck or chest in patients with limited venous access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A femoral venous approach was used to recanalize occluded veins or catheterize small collateral veins in 24 patients in whom all major central veins were occluded. A loop snare or catheter was used as a target for antegrade puncture. Metallic stents were deployed if necessary. Once antegrade access was secured, catheters were placed in a conventional fashion. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 22 (88%) of 25 procedures (one patient underwent two procedures). All catheters functioned immediately after placement. There were two procedural complications: a vasovagal episode requiring intravenously administered atropine sulfate and an episode of respiratory distress requiring intubation. There were no instances of pneumothorax, nerve injury, or bleeding complications. Catheter malfunction requiring exchange occurred at a rate of 0.67 per 100 catheter days. Infection requiring catheter removal occurred at a rate of 0.06 per 100 catheter days. Primary patency was 90% at 1 month, 71% at 6 months, and 25% at 12 months. Secondary patency was 100% at 6 months and 70% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hemodialysis in whom conventional venous access sites have been exhausted, interventional radiologic venous recanalization for the placement of permanent catheters is safe and effective. Catheters placed in recanalized veins or small collateral veins have shorter primary patency rates compared with those of conventionally placed catheters, but the former can be maintained for relatively long periods.     

A comparative analysis of radiological and surgical placement of central venous catheters

Purpose To compare the differences in practice and outcome of all radiologically and surgically placed central venous catheters retrospectively over a 2-year period simultaneously, at a single institution. Methods A total of 253 Hickman catheters were inserted in 209 patients; 120 were placed radiologically in 102 patients and 133 were placed surgically in 107 patients. The indication was chemotherapy in 76% of radiological and in 47% of surgical cases; the remainder were for total parenteral nutrition and venous access. Results There were 6 (4.5%) primary surgical failures and a further 17 (13%) surgical cases requiring multiple placement attempts. Pneumothorax occurred once (0.8%) surgically and four times (3.3%) radiologically. There were no radiological primary misplacements but there were five (3.7%) surgical ones. Catheter or central vein thrombosis occurred in four (3.3%) radiological and five (3.7%) surgical cases. The rate of infection per 1000 catheter-days was 1.9 in radiologically placed catheters and 4.0 in surgically placed ones (p<0.001). Average catheter life-span was similar for the two placement methods (100±23 days). Conclusion Radiological placement is consistently more reliable than surgical placement. There are fewer placement complications and fewer catheter infections overall.     

Use of the femoral vein as insertion site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters inserted through the common femoral vein. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2000 to June 2003, 33 consecutive patients had 86 tunneled hemodialysis catheters inserted through the femoral vein. There were 14 male and 19 female patients with a mean age of 56 years. Seventeen patients had bilateral central venous and/or superior vena cava (SVC) occlusions, 12 patients had unilateral central venous occlusions and were to receive contralateral arteriovenous fistulas or arteriovenous polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, and 4 patients received femoral catheters for other reasons. The technical success, complications, and clinical outcomes of these procedures were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: All procedures were technically successful. Fifty-seven catheters were inserted into the right femoral vein and 29 into the left femoral vein. This included 25 catheter exchanges in 13 patients. Two patients developed thigh hematomas. Follow-up data were available for 68 catheters; mean follow-up period was 51 days with a total of 3,484 catheter days. The catheter-related infection rate was 6.3 per 1,000 catheter days; 22 catheters were removed for infection. Eighteen catheters were removed because of poor blood flows (<200 mL/min). Thirteen catheters were removed because they had become retracted. Primary catheter patency was 44% at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The femoral vein provides an alternative access site for insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters when conventional sites are not available. However, tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters have low primary patency rates and significant complications. Catheter retraction is a unique and common problem.     

Radiologic placement of implantable chest ports in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the technical success and complications associated with radiologic placement of implantable chest ports in children for long-term central venous access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1, 1996 and January 11, 2000, 29 chest ports were placed in 28 children (15 girls, 13 boys; age range, 2-17 years; mean, 11.7 years). The patient's right internal jugular vein was used for access in 93% (27/29) of the procedures, and a collateral neck vein was used as a conduit to recanalize the central veins in two procedures because of bilateral jugular and subclavian vein occlusion. All procedures were performed in interventional radiology suites. Both real-time sonography and fluoroscopy were used to guide venipuncture and port insertion. Follow-up data were obtained through the clinical examination and electronic review of charts. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. Fourteen percent of the catheters were removed prematurely, including one catheter removed 17 days after placement because the patient's blood cultures were positive for Candida albicans. No patients experienced hematoma, symptomatic air embolism, symptomatic central venous thrombosis, catheter malposition, or pneumothorax. The median number of days for catheter use by patients was 280 days (total, 9043 days; range, 17-869 days). The rate of confirmed catheter-related infection was 14% or 0.04 per 100 venous access days. One catheter occluded after 132 days. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients, radiologists can insert implantable chest ports using real-time sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance with high rates of technical success and low rates of complication.     

Unconventional venous access

Venous access is commonly thought of as the bread and butter of interventional radiologic procedures. However, in those patients who have undergone multiple previous central venous catheter placements, venous access can be a technical challenge for even the most seasoned interventional radiologist. Conventional access sites include the internal jugular veins (IJV) and subclavian veins (SCV). The former should be considered as the primary access site for all patients who will be catheter dependent for whatever reason. Before utilization of the SCV, the external jugular veins (EJV) should be used, especially in the dialysis population. Only after surgical hemodialysis access is no longer an option in the upper extremity should cannulation of the SCV be entertained. Once these usual access sites are no longer available, it may necessary to use an unconventional access method, including catheterization of the common femoral vein, catheterization of enlarged collateral vessels, recanalization of occluded veins, translumbar inferior vena cava (IVC) catheter placement, and transhepatic catheter placement. This chapter serves as a review of these techniques.     

Tunneled internal jugular catheters in adult patients: comparison of outcomes in hemodialysis versus infusion catheters

Background: Tunneled central venous catheters placed by interventional radiologists are now widely used for hemodialysis and infusion therapies throughout the world. However, complications such as infections and malfunctions still remain a major concern in oncology and hemodialysis patients.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term follow-up results of tunneled central venous catheters in an adult population in terms of infectious complications and malfunction rates in dialysis and oncology patients.

Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts and our electronic database for 434 tunneled internal jugular catheters in 335 consecutive patients between December 2002 and March 2006. Mean patient age was 57 years (range 23-86 years) in the hemodialysis group and 45 years (range 18-83 years) in the infusion group. A total of 224 hemodialysis catheters were placed in 168 patients (68 females, 100 males) and 210 infusion catheters in 167 patients (48 females, 119 males).

Results: Technical success rate was 100%. Mean duration of catheter use was 86 days (1-652 days) and 60 days (2-686 days) for hemodialysis and infusion catheters, respectively. A total of 107 hemodialysis (47%) and 95 infusion catheters (45%) were electively removed due to completion of therapy and resolution of need for dialysis. Revisions were performed 0.22 and 0.11 per 100 catheters days in the hemodialysis and infusion groups, respectively. Our total infection rate was 0.10 episodes per 100 catheter days, and the rate of infections necessitating catheter removal was 0.05 episodes per 100 catheter days in the hemodialysis group, which is lower than that reported in other big series. However, in the infusion group, the rate of infections necessitating catheter removal was 0.28 episodes per 100 catheter days.

Conclusion: Long-term central venous accesses using tunneled internal jugular catheters appeared to be safe and effective for both hemodialysis and long-term infusion therapies, with relatively higher infection rates in oncologic patients.     

Thrombosis at venous insertion sites after inferior vena caval filter placement

Color Doppler flow imaging or compression ultrasound (US) was used to prospectively determine frequency of thrombosis at 54 venous insertion sites (47 in common femoral veins, seven in right internal jugular veins) after percutaneous placement of Greenfield filters for interruption of the inferior vena cava. Fifty-one filters were successfully placed in 51 patients with a dilator set or a balloon angioplasty catheter. Nine focal thrombi were detected in the common femoral vein (19%) and one in the right internal jugular vein (14%). Use of dilators induced eight thrombi (24%), compared with two (10%) from balloon catheters. The left common femoral vein had a high frequency of thrombosis, regardless of dilation technique (five of nine). Of nine patients with acute common femoral vein thrombosis, four became symptomatic within 10 days after the procedure. Patients may remain asymptomatic or have delayed symptoms; thus, US is valuable for determining patients at risk of thrombosis of the common femoral vein.     

Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the success and immediate complication rates in a large series of radiologically placed tunneled central venous catheters. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded the success and immediate complication rates in 880 consecutive radiologically placed tunneled central venous catheters. We also recorded the indication for placement, the success of placement, the number of passes required, and whether a double- or single-wall puncture occurred. RESULTS: Hemodialysis was the most common indication for long-term venous access. Venous access was successful in all patients, and catheter placement was successful in 99.4% of patients, with only five failed placements. All patients in whom placement was initially unsuccessful underwent successful placement the same day. All catheters were placed using real-time sonographic guidance. Most were placed in an internal jugular vein, with 87.4% requiring only a single needle pass. The immediate complication rate was only 4.0%, and no major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this series is the largest for which the immediate complication and success rates for radiologically placed central venous catheters have been reported. Our results suggest that radiologic placement of tunneled central venous catheters is a safe and effective alternative to surgery.     

Does umbilical vein catheterization lead to portal venous thrombosis? Prospective US evaluation in 100 neonates

PURPOSE: To establish, by means of serial ultrasonography (US), the incidence and natural history of neonatal portal venous thrombosis associated with catheterization of the umbilical vein and to evaluate the potential risk factors predisposing patients to thrombus formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neonates who had undergone umbilical vein catheterization were studied. US was performed at 2-7-day intervals, before and after the removal of the catheter, until clot resolution or hospital discharge. The presence of portal venous thrombosis and temporal evolution were noted, and various risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: US demonstrated clinically silent portal venous thrombosis in 43 (43%) of 100 neonates. Follow-up US revealed complete or partial resolution in 20 (56%) of 36 babies. A significant (P =.024) correlation was found between the initial size of the thrombi and spontaneous clot resolution. Statistically significant risk factors were catheterization for more than 6 days (P =.001) and transfusion (P =.019). CONCLUSION: Portal venous thrombosis is frequently associated with the placement of an umbilical venous catheter, and spontaneous resolution is expected in many cases. The duration of catheter placement should be minimized, and US monitoring is recommended as a guide to catheter removal.     

Incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports: results in 391 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and management of catheter occlusion in implantable arm ports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Findings were prospectively examined in 391 patients in whom 393 arm ports were placed. The indications for port placement included chemotherapy (n = 347), antibiotic administration (n = 35), combination chemotherapy/antibiotic use (n = 7), transfusion (n = 3), and phlebotomy (n = 1). Of the total catheters, 323 (82.2%) underwent tip modification prior to placement. Malfunctioning catheters were usually treated with urokinase instillation. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-three devices were implanted with 247 mean days of catheter use (total, 97,256 days; range, 1-694 days). The overall incidence of catheter occlusion was 0.14 per 100 catheter days. A single catheter occlusion occurred in 90 (22.9%) catheters, with a mean of 90.1 days before the event. A second occlusion occurred in 36 (9.2%) of the above catheters, with a mean of 60.1 catheter days before the second event. Eighty-five (24.0%) of the 347 cancer patients had at least one occlusive event, yielding a complication rate of 0.098 per 100 catheter days at risk (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.079-0.114). Of the 35 patients receiving antibiotics, three (8.6%) had at least one occlusive event. This represented a complication rate of 0.032 per 100 catheter days at risk (95% CI; 0.010-0.061). Seventeen (24.3%) of the nonmodified catheters developed an occlusion versus 72 (22.3%) of the modified (P > .05; Fisher exact test). Of the catheters with a first occlusive event, 75 (98.7%) were treated successfully with urokinase instillation. Four (1.0%) patients developed symptomatic subclavian vein thrombosis. No bleeding complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Catheter occlusion is a common complication of long-term arm port placement, with a significantly higher incidence in the cancer patients in our series (P <. 05, Fisher exact test). Catheter tip modification, however, does not considerably affect the incidence of occlusion. Low-dose urokinase therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment of catheter occlusion, obviating the need for catheter removal.     

Tunneled Internal Jugular Hemodialysis Catheters: Impact of Laterality and Tip Position on Catheter Dysfunction and Infection Rates

PurposeTo determine rates of dysfunction and infection for tunneled internal jugular vein hemodialysis catheters based on laterality of insertion and catheter tip position.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of a procedural database for tunneled internal jugular vein hemodialysis catheter placements between January 2008 and December 2009 revealed 532 catheter insertions in 409 patients (234 male; mean age, 54.9 y). Of these, 398 catheters were placed on the right and 134 on the left. The catheter tip location was categorized as superior vena cava (SVC), pericavoatrial junction, or mid- to deep right atrium based on review of the final intraprocedural radiograph. The rates of catheter dysfunction and catheter-related infection (reported as events per 100 catheter-days) were analyzed.ResultsCatheters terminating in the SVC or pericavoatrial junction inserted from the left showed significantly higher rates of infection (0.50 vs 0.27; P = .005) and dysfunction (0.25 vs 0.11; P = .036) compared with those inserted from the right. No difference was identified based on laterality for catheter tip position in the mid- to deep right atrium. Left-sided catheters terminating in the SVC or pericavoatrial junction had significantly more episodes of catheter dysfunction or infection than catheters terminating in the mid- to deep right atrium (0.84 vs 0.35; P = .006), whereas no significant difference was identified for right-sided catheters based on tip position.ConclusionsWhen inserted from the left internal jugular vein, catheter tip position demonstrated a significant impact on catheter-related dysfunction and infection; this relationship was not demonstrated for right-sided catheters.     

US-guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: immediate technical success and complications in normal and high-risk patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical success and immediate complication rates of temporary internal jugular vein (IJV) haemodialysis catheter placement in normal and high-risk patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two-hundred and twenty temporary internal jugular vein catheters inserted under ultrasound guidance in 172 patients were prospectively analyzed. Of 172 patients, 93 (54%) were males and 79 (46%) were females (age range, 18-83; mean, 56.0 years). Of 220 catheters, 171 (78%) were placed in patients who had a risk factor for catheter placement like patients with disorder of haemostasis, poor compliance, and previous multiple catheter insertion in the same IJV. Forty-seven (21.3%) procedures were performed on bed-side. A catheter was inserted in the right IJV in 178 procedures (80.9%) and left IJV in 42 procedures. Of 172 patients, 112 (65%) had only one catheter placement and the rest had had more than one catheter placement (range, 1-5). RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Average number of puncture was 1.24 (range, 1-3). One hundred and eighty-three insertions (83.1%) were single-wall punctures, whereas 37 punctures were double wall punctures. Nine (4%) minor complications were encountered. Inadvertent carotid artery puncture without a sequel in four procedures (1.8%), oozing of blood around the catheter in three procedures (1.4%), a small hematoma in one procedure (0.4%), and puncture through the pleura in one procedure (0.4%) without development of pneumothorax. Oozing of blood was seen only in patients with disorder of haemostasis. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided placement of internal jugular vein catheters is very safe with very high success rate and few complications. It can safely be performed in high-risk patients, like patients with disorders of haemostasis and patients with previous multiple catheter insertion in the same vein.     

Transhepatic catheter access for hemodialysis

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review the authors' experience regarding the safety and functionality of transhepatic hemodialysis catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (seven men and nine women aged 21-77 years; mean age, 51.6 years) underwent placement of 21 transhepatic hemodialysis catheters. Transhepatic catheters were placed in the absence of an available peripheral venous site (11 patients) or for preservation of a single remaining venous site to achieve permanent vascular access. Safety was assessed by means of complications encountered, and catheter functionality was assessed by means of total access site service interval. Catheter patency was described by using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and number of catheter days were compared according to patient sex by using a two-sample t test. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients. The mean total access site service interval was 138 catheter days (range, 0-599 days), and there was no significant difference according to patient sex (P =.869). Of the 16 catheters placed initially, five became dislodged and required an additional access procedure to be performed. These 21 catheters required 30 exchanges in 10 patients (48%) (range, 1-6 exchanges per patient). The most common reason for catheter exchange was device failure. There were six complications among 21 catheters placed (29%), including one death from massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage on the day after catheter placement. CONCLUSION: Transhepatic hemodialysis catheters offer a viable option to patients with limited options; however, there are maintenance issues and complications.     

Exchange of poorly functioning tunneled permanent hemodialysis catheters.

OBJECTIVE: The usefulness of exchanging poorly functioning tunneled permanent hemodialysis catheters in patients with end-stage renal disease was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed case histories of 51 consecutive patients who underwent 88 catheter exchanges because of poor flow rates. All hemodialysis catheters were initially placed by the radiology service using image guidance. Catheter exchanges were performed through the existing subcutaneous tract over two stiff hydrophilic guidewires and without additional interventions such as fibrin sheath stripping or venoplasty. Life table analysis was performed to evaluate catheter patency rates after initial placement (primary patency) and after multiple exchanges (secondary patency). RESULTS: The technical success rate for hemodialysis catheter exchange was 100%. Primary catheter patency was 42% at 60 days and 16% at 120 days. Secondary patency was 92% at 60 days and 82% at 120 days. The cumulative infection rate was 1.1 per 1000 catheter days. No complications from the procedure occurred. CONCLUSION: Catheter exchange is an effective means of prolonging catheter patency in patients with end-stage renal disease and limited central venous access.