Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps

AIMS: To describe and assess the efficacy of mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (MENDCR). This is a new technique that involves creation of a large rhinostomy and mucosal flaps. The study involved a prospective non-randomised interventional case series with short perioperative follow up. METHOD: A prospective series of 104 consecutive endonasal DCRs performed from January 1999 to December 2001 were entered into the study. Patients included in the study had nasolacrimal duct obstruction and had not had previous lacrimal surgery. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. Surgery was performed by two surgeons (AT/PJW). Follow up assessment included nasoendoscopy as well as symptom evaluation. Success was defined as anatomical patency with fluorescein flow on nasoendoscopy and patency to lacrimal syringing. The average follow up time was 9.7 months (range 2-28, SD 6.7 months). RESULTS: There were 104 DCRs performed on 86 patients (30 male, 56 female). The average age of the patients was 59 years (range 3-89, SD 24.1 years). Common presentations were epiphora (77%) and/or mucocele (19%). Septoplasty (SMR) was required in 48 DCRs (46%) and 13 DCRs (12.5%) needed other endoscopic surgery in conjunction with the lacrimal surgery. The surgery was successful in 93 cases (89%). Of the 11 cases that were classified as a failure six patients was anatomically patent but still symptomatic and another two had preoperative canalicular problems. The anatomical patency with this new technique was thus 95% (99 of 104 DCRs). CONCLUSION: MENDCR involves creation of a large ostium and mucosal preservation for the construction of flaps. The anatomical success is 95% and is similar to external DCR and better then other endonasal approaches. The authors suggest that creation of a large ostium as well as mucosal flaps improves the efficacy of this endonasal technique.     

Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps

PURPOSE: To describe a new endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) technique and assess its efficacy. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized interventional case series. METHODS: A prospective series of 44 consecutive endonasal DCRs performed from January 1999 to December 2000 was entered into the study. The new technique involved creation of a large bony ostium and mucosal flaps to create an anastamosis between the lacrimal sac mucosa and nasal mucosa. Patients presenting with naso-lacrimal duct obstruction based on symptomatic, clinical, and radiologic grounds were included in the study. Patients who had undergone previous lacrimal surgery were excluded. Surgery was performed by two surgeons (A.T., P.J.W.) using a standardized operative technique. Patient demographics, presentation, examination findings, surgical and anesthetic data, postoperative success, complications, and follow-up were evaluated. Success was defined as anatomic patency as well as relief of symptoms as assessed by fluorescein flow on nasendoscopy, lacrimal syringing, and patient examination. Intubation of the lacrimal apparatus was performed in all operations and the tubes usually removed at 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. After removal of the tubes follow-up was 13 months (mean, 12.9 months; range, 9-28 months; standard deviation [SD], 6.1 months). RESULTS: There were 36 patients (12 male/24 female) who underwent 44 endonasal DCRs. The average age of the patients was 62.9 years old (range, 15-86 years old; SD, 19.1 years) and the main presentation was with epiphora (93%) and/or mucocoele (33%). In 13 operations (30%) a septoplasty was required at the time of surgery, and in 10 operations (23%) further endoscopic sinus surgery was performed in conjunction with the DCR. Anatomic success with a patent nasolacrimal system was achieved in 40 of 44 operations (91%). Symptomatic and anatomic success was seen in 39 of 44 operations (89%). Five of the DCRs were classified as failures. In one DCR the patient was symptomatic despite a patent nasolacrimal system and well-healed ostium. In two DCRs preoperative medial canalicular problems were noted. In two DCRs scarring and fibrosis of ostium were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique of endonasal DCR involves creation of a large ostium and construction of nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps. Its anatomic success rate (91% or 40 of 44 DCRs) compares favorably with the success rate of other techniques for endonasal DCR and is also similar to the success of external DCR. Experience in endoscopic nasal surgery is important in endonasal DCR surgery, as other ancillary procedures may be required within the nose at the time of surgery.     

The hydrogel lacrimal stent for dacryocystorhinostomy: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: To present the results of dacryocystorhinostomy with the use of a newly designed hydrogel lacrimal stent for repair of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. METHODS: Noncomparative interventional case series. Twenty-three cases of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction confirmed by probing and irrigation underwent dacryocystorhinostomy using the hydrogel lacrimal stent. Tearing symptoms, functional endoscopic dye test, and anatomic appearance of ostia were noted at follow-up. RESULTS: Five of 23 ostia closed during the postoperative period (1-3 months), translating to a late success rate of 78.3%. The 5 failed cases were treated successfully with ostium revision, 1 case requiring 2 revisions. All patients had endoscopic follow-up with a minimum follow-up of 6 months after stent removal. In the successful cases we noted a large, quiet ostium with good separation of the nasal septum and middle turbinate. Eleven cases (47.8%) had history of previously failed dacryocystorhinostomy surgery, chronic sinusitis, deviated septum, or maxillofacial surgery. There were no complications or reports of unusual pain or symptoms associated with the stent itself. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience suggests the hydrogel lacrimal stent is a well-tolerated, effective tool for dacryocystorhinostomy surgery after acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The device may serve as a useful surgical tool by holding open the ostium, maintaining apposition of the mucosal edges, and decreasing the incidence of nasal adhesions.     

Selective non-intubation of a silicone tube in external dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether silicone tube insertion is always necessary in external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). METHODS: During external DCR for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction carried out between January 2001 and October 2004, silicone intubation was not performed selectively if the lacrimal sac was large and the nasal cavity was not severely narrowed. RESULTS: Of a total of 166 DCR cases in 153 patients, no silicone tube was placed in 74 eyes of 69 patients (44.6%). Anatomic patency of rhinostomy was achieved in all non-intubation group eyes. However, four (6.7%) of these 69 eyes showed persistent epiphora even with anatomic patency. CONCLUSIONS: Silicone tubing can be avoided in about 50% of cases of external DCR without detrimentally affecting the success rate. Cases in which intubation was avoided had a large lacrimal sac and a wide nasal cavity.     

Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome profile of endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy (ENL-DCR) in comparison with external dacryocystorhinostomy (ENL-DCR) carried out as part of general ophthalmic service within the same center. METHODS: Patients who have undergone external or endonasal laser DCR in the authors institute with a minimum follow-up of 9 months and at least 3 months after removal of the tubes were invited to participate in this research. We used a questionnaire and a systematic clinical examination for detecting lacrimal passage patency and function. Patients were classified into categories: complete anatomical and physiological success; anatomical success with partial relief of symptoms; anatomical success with no relief of symptoms; anatomical failure.The endoscopic view of the ostium vertical location has been classified into four levels. RESULTS: One hundred and ten external-DCR and 53 Endonasal-DCR procedures were evaluated. Free communication (anatomical success) was achieved in 82% undergoing Ext-DCR and in 58% undergoing ENL-DCR. A significant number of patients continued to have symptoms in spite of a patent fistula (54% for Ext-DCR and 39% for ENL-DCR). The site of the opening of the internal ostium was significantly related to the persistence of symptoms in spite of free communication (P < 0.001, chi-square test). CONCLUSION: In this series of patients undergoing DCR in a general ophthalmic unit, the standard Ext-DCR technique has a higher anatomical success rate than the endoscopic laser DCR but not necessarily with equivalent rate of relief of symptoms. An inferiorly placed ostium is more likely to result in complete relief of symptoms.     

Four-year experience with intranasal transilluminating dacryocystorhinostomy using ultrasound

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the results obtained by intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomised, non-comparative case series study of 150 patients with epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The same team of ophthalmic and otorhinologic surgeons performed the transilluminating intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy using ultrasound. The main outcome measures were subjective improvement of epiphora, dye testing, lacrimal probing, lacrimal irrigation, and endoscopic nasal examination. RESULTS: Symptomatic relief and patency of the lacrimal apparatus was achieved in 92% (138) of the patients at the 3-month follow-up and 89% (134) at the 6-month follow-up. At 1 year, only 2 patients of the 134 initial successes showed obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct. All 16 successful patients that we have followed for 4 years have sustained their improvement. INTERPRETATION: Transilluminating intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy is a quick and safe option for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The main advantages over external dacryocystorhinostomy are avoidance of skin incision, reduced haemorrhage, shorter duration of the operation, and quicker recovery of the patient.     

External dacryocystorhinostomy for the treatment of acquired partial nasolacrimal obstruction in adults

AIM: To determine the long term success of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in adults with acquired partial nasolacrimal obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective study of 50 external dacryocystorhinostomies with silicone intubation performed for partial nasolacrimal obstruction, was undertaken. Preoperative lacrimal scintigraphy divided drainage abnormalities into presac or postsac delays. Postoperative success was determined by lacrimal patency to irrigation, a positive dye test on nasal endoscopy and subjective resolution of epiphora. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A patent DCR system to irrigation and a positive dye test was achieved in 90% of procedures. At an average of 3.6 months' follow up, subjective success was reported in 84% of cases-91% for postsac and 67% for presac delays. At 3 years' follow up success had declined to 70% overall and to 80% and 47% for postsac and presac occlusions respectively. There was a statistically significant association between a presac delay and postoperative recurrence of epiphora, p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: External DCR with silicone intubation is an effective procedure for partial nasolacrimal obstruction. Presac delays do significantly less well and further studies are necessary to evaluate the best type of surgery for these patients.     

Transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser: long-term results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser in treatment of epiphora in adults. METHODS: A prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series of transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy in 25 patients presenting with epiphora due to nasolacrimal obstruction. Patient age ranged from 32 to 72 years. Patients were evaluated postoperatively at 12, 24, and 36 months. Patients were evaluated for symptom improvement through a visual analog scale, and patency of osteotomy by lacrimal system irrigation with fluorescein and direct visualization by nasal endoscopy. Success was defined as resolution of epiphora. RESULTS: Transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy was able to re-establish patency of the lacrimal system in 88% of cases after 36 months of surgery. No differences were found between patients older than 65 years and younger patients (chi-square, p > 0.05). Early (12 months) and late (36 months) results were similar (chi-square, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective series, transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy was effective in treatment of epiphora in adults with little morbidity.     

Comparison of endoscopic revision for failed primary external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Backgound: To compare differences in endoscopic revision after previously failed lacrimal surgery that involved either external or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Design: Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study. Participants: We assessed 77 patients (82 surgeries) treated for recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods: Electronic medical records for patients with recurrent epiphora who underwent endoscopic revisional dacryocystorhinostomy, after previous external or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from 2004 to 2010, were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: Data regarding the lacrimal drainage system, comprehensive eye examination, surgical outcome and preoperative/perioperative transnasal endoscopy were analysed. Results: In total, 77 patients underwent 82 endoscopic revisional dacryocystorhinostomy procedures. A success rate of 84% was achieved for cases of previous external dacryocystorhinostomy and 80.7% for previous endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (P = 0.722). For preoperative nasal endoscopy, more of the patients who underwent previous external dacryocystorhinostomy exhibited a hypertrophic middle turbinate and severe septal deviation when compared with patients who underwent previous endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (P = 0.031, P = 0.001, respectively). For perioperative nasal endoscopy, more of the patients who underwent previous endoscopic DCR exhibited a smaller ostium when compared with patients who underwent previous external dacryocystorhinostomy (P = 0.031). Conclusions: The success rate of revisional dacryocystorhinostomy in the previous external dacryocystorhinostomy group was slightly higher than that in the previous endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy group. Differences in preoperative and perioperative endoscopic findings were detected between the groups. Clarifying these differences in endoscopic revision will help improve the surgical outcomes of primary surgery involving either external or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.     

Long-term outcomes of revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy aided by 4-mm coronary balloon catheter dacryoplasty

Our purpose was assess the long-term efficacy of 4-mm coronary balloon catheter dacryoplasty in revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (RevEnDCR). This retrospective interventional case-series was performed for patients who underwent RevEnDCR aided by a 4-mm coronary balloon catheter (CBC) dacryoplasty. The indications for the surgery were previously failed DCRs by external or endoscopic approach where the ostium showed near total cicatrization with or without the presence of organized granuloma threatening the internal common opening (ICO). The coronary balloon (4 × 10 mm, SPALNO, Cardiomac, Haryana, India) with the guidewire was used and a minimum of >12 months of follow-up was considered for analysis. Ten lacrimal systems of eight patients with mean age of 48.8 years underwent CBC-assisted revision endoscopic DCR. Of the 10 failed DCRs, 6 had a previous external approach DCR and 4 were endoscopic DCRs. Grossly stenosed ostium with near total cicatricial closure were noted in half of the patients (50%, 5/10) while the remaining half, in addition, showed organized granulomas threatening the ICO. The surgical technique using CBC was found to be minimally invasive, easy to perform with multiple advantages like uniform clearance of the area in front of ICO and more predictable lacrimal sac flaps. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, anatomical and functional success were achieved in 90% (9/10) of the eyes. We conclude that coronary balloon catheter-assisted revision endoscopic DCR is a minimally invasive and viable alternative in select group of patients of failed DCR with near total cicatrisation or organized granulomas threatening ICO.     

Endoscopic-guided trephination dacryocystorhinostomy (hesham DCR) : Technique and pilot trial

OBJECTIVES: (1) Test the feasibility and the safety of guided transnasal trephination in creating a nasolacrimal fistula. (2) Develop an appropriate lacrimal maintainer and test its value in modulating healing at the fistula site. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Five cadavers and 19 patients. METHOD: A transcanalicular lacrimal probe penetrated the lacrimal fossa to guide the passage of a flexible trephine up the nose, which created the nasolacrimal communication. A special wide-caliber lacrimal maintainer was inserted along lacrimal tubes within the created passage. OUTCOME MEASURES: For cadaveric study, direct inspection after dissection of the facial flap was performed. For the clinical trial, subjective improvement in watery eye, dye testing, lacrimal probing, lacrimal irrigation, and endoscopic nasal examination. RESULTS: The technique resulted in the creation of a regular fistula of reproducible diameter into which a standard-shaped wide caliber maintainer could be inserted. Three months after removal of the maintainer and 6 months after surgery, a patent ostium was achieved in 17 of 18 (94%) patients who had a completed procedure. Relief of symptoms was achieved in 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Guided endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy provides a simple and safe option for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The lacrimal maintainer is a useful device to achieve a large patent nasolacrimal communication.     

Intraoperative mitomycin C in dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) in external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXT-DCR). METHODS: Forty-six cases (50 lacrimal drainage systems [LDS]) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction were randomized into three groups. In the control group, a standard EXT-DCR procedure was performed. In the two MMC groups, a piece of cotton soaked with 0.2 mg/ml MMC (group 1) or 0.5 mg/ml MMC (group 2) was applied to the nasal mucosa and the mucosa of the lacrimal sac in the osteotomy site for 5 minutes. RESULTS: The dacryocystorhinostomy in all patients was patent by irrigation 2 to 3 weeks postoperatively. After a mean follow-up interval of 35.2 +/- 5.3 months, the dacryocystorhinostomy was patent in 15 (83%) of 18 LDS in the control group, 16 (100%) of 16 LDS in group 1, and 15 (94%) of 16 LDS in group 2. The mean ostium sizes were 22.2 +/- 5.0 mm2 in group 1, 20.6 +/- 4.5 mm2 in group 2, and 13.2 +/- 2.7 mm2 in group 3 at the final follow-up visit; the difference between the patients treated with MMC and the control group was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the two MMC groups, however. No surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative MMC in DCR is a safe and effective adjuvant that helps achieve favorable long-term success rates.     

Associated factors of functional failure of external dacryocystorhinostomy

Objective

To evaluate the incidence and associated factors of functional failure of anatomically patent external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized case series.

Participants

Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent external DCR at the oculoplasty clinic in the Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital between December 2008 and July 2009.

Methods

All patients underwent external DCR for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The silicone tubes were removed around 6 months after the DCRs, and patients were examined 1 month after tube removal. Anatomical patency was evaluated by a nasal endoscopic dye test and lacrimal syringing test. Tearing symptoms were evaluated using Munk’s scoring system. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of epiphora symptom; a functional success and functional failure group, and the incidence of functional failure were calculated. Potential associated factors were also compared between 2 groups.

Results

This study involved 50 eyes of 34 patients, and 8 eyes of 6 patients showed significant epiphora in spite of anatomical patency (16% functional failure). We compared associated factors between 42 functionally successful and 8 functionally failed DCRs. Among variables studied, demographic factors and intraoperative surgical findings were not statistically different between the 2 groups. With respect to intranasal endoscopic findings, the shape of the rhinostomy showed significant differences between the 2 groups (p = 0.03, Fisher’s exact test). In the functional failure group, there were no flat shape rhinostomies. Three showed alcove shape rhinostomies, and the other 5 showed cavern shape rhinostomies.

Conclusions

Among anatomically patent DCRs, the incidence of persistent epiphora was 16%. The shape of rhinostomy is a possible associated factor for functional failure after external DCR.     

Transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy

Objective:

We present a prospective, non-comparative case series study of 126 consecutive diode laser-assisted transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TCL-DCR) procedures on 122 patients. We analyzed success rate, procedure time and amount of laser energy needed for a 5 mm osteotomy.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and twenty-two patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction were included in the study. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia, and the nasal mucosa was anesthetized. An endoscope was used for examination of the lacrimal pathways. The site of osteotomy was determined with transillumination of the lateral nasal wall. We achieved osteotomy by applying laser energy via an optic fiber. We used a 980 nm diode laser with power of 10 Watts. We inserted a bicanalicular silicone stent as the last step. Success of procedure was absence of epiphora (subjective), or patency of the lacrimal drainage system on irrigation (objective).

Results:

We performed 126 successive endoscopic laser (EL-DCR) with bicanalicular intubation in 122 patients. The average procedure time was 12 min, and on average 245 Joules of laser energy was needed. The silicone stents were removed three to eight months after surgery. We observed absence of epiphora and a patent nasolacrimal duct on irrigation in 105 out of 126 treated eyes. Eighteen patients had epiphora despite a patent nasolacrimal duct on irrigation. This yields a success rate of 83.3%, with an average follow-up period of 12 months.

Conclusions:

The 980 nm EL-DCR with bicanalicular intubation is a new contribution to the field of lacrimal surgery. It is a minimally invasive quick procedure yielding a high success rate.     

The treatment of acute dacryocystitis using laser assisted endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

AIMS: To determine whether acute dacryocystitis complicated by abscess formation can be successfully treated using laser assisted endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. METHODS: A protocol was adopted for the management of acute dacryocystitis presenting to an ophthalmology department. All patients were assessed jointly by an ophthalmologist and otolaryngologist for their suitability for primary internal drainage via a nasal endoscopic approach. All suitable patients during the study period August 1999 to November 2000 were managed by intravenous antibiotics and holmium:YAG laser dacryocystorhinostomy. RESULTS: Nine patients were studied (mean age 72 years (range 38-82 years), three men, six women). A history of chronic epiphora was found in 78% of patients, and recurrent nasolacrimal infections in the same 78%. Resolution of symptoms and signs of acute dacryocystitis occurred in all nine patients. No recurrence of acute dacryocystitis occurred during the median follow up period of 11 months (range 6-31 months). Ostium patency defined as the absence of epiphora and the observation of irrigated lacrimal fluorescein at the ostium was achieved in 67% of patients. Epiphora recurred in 33% of cases. CONCLUSION: Laser assisted endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy is an effective primary treatment in cases of acute dacryocystitis complicated by abscess formation. In addition, pre-existing symptoms of epiphora and recurrent nasolacrimal infections are relieved in the majority of patients.     

A glued technique of external dacryocystorhinostomy

Purpose:Fibrin glue was used for anastomosis of lacrimal sac and nasal mucosal flaps and was compared with the conventional suture technique in external dacryocystorhinostomy.Methods:A prospective interventional randomized control study in which 50 consecutive patients of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) were equally allocated into two groups. The case group underwent glued technique of external dacryocystorhinostomy (Ext DCR) in which fibrin glue was used for the apposition of the anterior lacrimal sac and nasal mucosal flaps. In the control group, conventional technique of Ext DCR was used to suture the flaps. Functional success was assessed by improvement in epiphora and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT), whereas anatomical success was assessed by lacrimal irrigation and endoscopic view of the osteotomy site.Results:The anatomical success in both the groups was 92%, whereas the functional success was 92% in the case group and 88% in the control group. The difference in the success rates between the two groups was statistically non-significant.Conclusion:Glued technique of Ext DCR is a simple and easy alternative to suturing of the flaps. Though the final outcome was comparable in both the groups, glue can be especially useful in uncooperative cases, in cases of excessive bleeding, or in situations where the flaps are very thin or have become friable.     

Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy versus primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a review

This paper aims to compare the efficacy, mean operative time and adverse effects of primary external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) versus primary endonasal DCR in treating acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Searches were performed for studies comparing the two procedures. Two reviewers independently extracted data from 14 eligible studies. A random effects model was used to analyse the studies. Outcome measures were defined as patency of the nasolacrimal canal and mean operative time, and adverse effects as cutaneous scarring and bleeding. Both procedures were comparable in efficacy in terms of full success, partial success and anatomic patency. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between prospective and retrospective studies as well as between non‐laser endonasal DCR versus external DCR and laser endonasal DCR versus external DCR. Endonasal DCR had a significantly shorter mean operative duration, be it laser endonasal DCR (mean difference: 37.65 min, 95% confidence intervals: 3.54–71.75 min, P: 0.03) or non‐laser endonasal DCR (mean difference: 19.22 min, 95% confidence intervals: 2.15–36.28 min, P: 0.03). The odds of postoperative bleeding was not significantly different between the two procedures, whereas postoperative cutaneous scarring was unique to external DCR and occurred in 50 out of 402 (12.44%) external DCRs recorded. Endonasal DCR has comparable success rates with external DCR and has a shorter operative time and no cutaneous scar. However, drawbacks include the steep learning curve and higher costs.     

Safety and efficacy of adjunctive intranasal mitomycin C and triamcinolone in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

One of the common causes of failure in dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is mucosal scarring and fibrosis around the ostium. Steroid and mitomycin C (MMC) can potentially reduce scarring by their action on the inflammatory and proliferative phase of wound healing, respectively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined usage of adjunctive MMC and intranasal triamcinolone (TA) in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR). This is a retrospective interventional case series. All patients underwent mechanical EE-DCR in two regional hospitals in Hong Kong from January 2005 to December 2006 were included. All received intraoperative MMC application for 5 min and gelfoam soaked with TA onto the ostium. Main outcome measures include the anatomical and functional success rate at follow-up at least 6 months after operation. Other outcomes include complications occurred during and after operation. A total of 73 EE-DCR were performed in 69 patients. Three patients had simultaneous bilateral DCR; one had sequential DCRs for both sides. At the last follow-up, anatomical success was achieved in 68 cases (93 %) and both anatomical with functional success in 67 cases (92 %). No major complication was observed. Minor complications included asymptomatic mucosal adhesion between the nasal septum and lateral nasal wall in one patient and moderate secondary hemorrhage in another. EE-DCR with adjunctive MMC and TA is a safe and successful procedure for the treatment of NLDO.     

External versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in a specialized lacrimal surgery center

Purpose

To study the duration of surgery, outcomes, adverse events and success rates of external versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery in a specialized lacrimal surgery center.

Methods

Prospective, interventional case series. Standard external DCR technique was performed. Mechanical endonasal DCR was performed with enlargement of the ostium and full length opening of the lacrimal sac. Surgical time, duration of intubation, incidence of hemorrhage, infection, wound dehiscence; follow-up duration and functional success at the end of follow up were recorded.

Results

Functional success and symptomatic relief were equivalent in both procedures. Endonasal DCR surgery was found to be quicker to perform than external DCR surgery. The follow-up duration was comparable in both groups (mean 9 months). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the endonasal DCR group (9.3 versus 8.6).

Conclusion

Endonasal DCR surgery offers a very attractive alternative to the well established technique of external DCR surgery for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction with equivalent success rates, shorter surgical time and higher patient satisfaction.     

The value of nasal endoscopy after dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE To determine the value of office nasal endoscopy after dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). METHODS A prospective clinical observational study of consecutive adult patients after primary external or endonasal surgical DCR, both with intubation for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Nasal endoscopy was used at the time of tube retrieval and six months after surgery to evaluate nasal pathology and ostium function. RESULTS Sixteen patients were examined. 5/16 (31%) had surgically induced nasal synaechiae; in 2/5 patients transnasal synaechiae occluded the ostium. Granuloma adjacent to the ostia in 2/16 (12.5%) did not impair function. There was no difference in the incidence of synaechiae or granuloma after endonasal compared to external DCR. In 3/16 (19%) endoscopy aided retrieval of tubes concealed by transnasal synaechiae or a narrow nasal space. Six months after surgery ostium function was positive in 12/16 (75%) using the functional endoscopic dye test; 13/16 (81%) patients had relief of epiphora with patent syringing; one had an alternative drainage route. CONCLUSIONS Nasal endoscopy after DCR i) identifies surgically induced nasal mucosal pathology, ii) assists in difficult retrieval of tubes and iii) assesses ostium function using the functional endoscopic dye test. The information obtained is adding much to our understanding of the effects of DCR at the lacrimal / sinus / nasal interface.