Elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels in conjunction with an initial prostatic biopsy negative for carcinoma: who should undergo a repeat biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of repeated prostatic biopsies in men attending with suspected prostate cancer but an initial negative biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone two or more transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies were identified from the Hospital Information Support System database. Indications for TRUS were a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (>4.0 ng/mL), with or without an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Sextant prostate biopsies plus biopsies of any suspicious hypoechoic area or area of DRE abnormality were obtained for histology. Forty-eight patients underwent repeat TRUS-guided prostatic biopsies (mean age 67.5, sd 7. 25, range 53-82 years). RESULTS: The mean (sd, median, range) PSA level was 16.9 (13.5, 11.6, 5.2-61.8) ng/mL. Fifteen patients (31%) had carcinoma on repeat biopsy, 11 after the second and four after a third biopsy. The positive repeat biopsy rate was 24% where the PSA level was 4.0-9.9 ng/mL, 33% if the level was 10.0-19.9 ng/mL and 39% if it was >/=20.0 ng/mL. There was no significant difference in age or initial PSA concentration between those men with positive and those with negative repeat biopsies. However, patients with cancer had significantly higher PSA levels before repeat biopsy than at first biopsy (P=0.0043) and had greater PSA velocities than had patients with no diagnosis of cancer (P=0.0067). CONCLUSION: Where sufficient clinical suspicion exists, despite an initial negative biopsy, repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsies should be carried out to exclude carcinoma of the prostate.     

Clinical, biochemical and pathological features of initial and repeat transrectal ultrasonography prostate biopsy positive patients

BACKGROUND: Using sextant biopsy, 16-41% of prostate cancers were diagnosed on repeat biopsy. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in the clinical, biochemical and pathological features between patients with positive results on initial and repeat biopsies, with an aim to identify factors that can be used to improve the detection rate of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy of the prostate. METHODS: Between February 2000 and April 2001, 222 patients with a mean age of 64 years (range 38-85) underwent TRUS-guided 10-core prostate biopsy for either abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Of this number, 165 patients underwent their first biopsy, whereas 45 and 12 patients had had one or two previous biopsies, respectively. RESULTS: Prostate cancer detection rates for the initial biopsy group (n = 165), second biopsy group (n = 45) and third biopsy group (n = 12) were 29.7, 23.0 and 41.7%, respectively. Six patients who had a negative first 10-core biopsy underwent a second 10-core biopsy and one patient (16%) was found to have cancer. Apart from total prostate volume, there were no significant statistical differences between the patient age, mean total PSA, PSA density, PSA-transition zone density, DRE and TRUS findings between the initial and repeat biopsy groups of subjects who had cancer. Those who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had larger prostate glands (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Patients who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had bigger prostate glands, supporting the hypothesis that TRUS sextant biopsy as a technique suffers the error of under-sampling in a bigger prostate.     

Repeat prostate biopsy in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in a cohort of men undergoing prostate cancer screening who have a negative initial biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Prostate, Colorectal, Lung, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial is an ongoing study the prostate component of which consists of six annual screens with measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a digital rectal examination (DRE). The diagnostic follow-up of positive screening results is done by the subject's healthcare provider outside the purview of the PLCO. We analysed the experience of repeat biopsy in men in the PLCO with an initial negative biopsy. Men were divided by indication for initial biopsy into those with suspicious PSA levels and those with suspicious DRE findings. RESULTS: The probability of having a repeat biopsy within 3 years of initial biopsy was 43% for 1736 men with suspicious PSA levels and 13% for 1025 men with suspicious DRE findings. Rates of third and fourth biopsy after a previous negative biopsy were similar to the initial repeat biopsy rate in PSA-positive men. Most men had a repeat biopsy only after having an additional round of screening. The PSA level and PSA velocity determined after initial biopsy were independent risk factors for a repeat biopsy, both in PSA-positive and DRE-positive men. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was a risk factor for repeat biopsy before any repeat PSA or DRE testing. CONCLUSION: The experience of this cohort should be generally representative of patterns of care for repeat biopsy in men undergoing periodic screening. These data can provide context to the debate over optimum practices for repeat biopsy.     

Clinical evaluation of transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of power Doppler imaging (PDI), we compared this method to gray-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in the detection of prostate cancer. A total of 101 men with abnormally high serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings were assessed using TRUS and PDI. Random systematic sextant and bilateral far lateral prostate biopsies were performed in all cases. In addition, when TRUS revealed a hypoechoic lesion or PDI revealed a hypervascular lesion (HVL), these lesions were directly biopsied. Of the 101 patients, 48 (47.5%), 42 (41.5%) and 42 (41.5%) were suspicious of having prostate cancer by DRE, TRUS and PDI, respectively. Prostate needle biopsy revealed prostate cancer in 39 patients (38.6%) and benign prostatic diseases in 62 patients (61.4%). If prostate needle biopsy was avoided when PDI was negative, then PDI eliminated the need for biopsy in 59 of the 101 patients (rate of biopsy procedures saved: 58.4%) and missed only 8 (13.6%) prostate cancers. Moreover, in 63 patients with intermediate PSA (3-10 ng/ml), the rate of biopsy procedures saved by DRE, TRUS, and PDI was 60.3%, 65.1%, and 68.3%, respectively, and the rate of cancers missed was 26.3%, 19.5%, and 14.0%, respectively. In a total of 826 specimens of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, 126 (15.3%) specimens had adenocarcinoma. Site by site based analysis of the present series revealed 34.1% of prostate cancer sites were isoechoic and hypervascular. On a site by site basis, PDI had better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value than TRUS. In 48 patients without abnormal DRE findings, on a site by site basis, the sensitivities of TRUS and PDI were 22.9% and 34.4%, respectively. Gleason score was associated with a positive rate of PDI on both a patient basis and site by site basis. From these results, on a patient basis, we conclude that PDI was helpful in the indication for prostate biopsy for all patients or patients with intermediate PSA level. On a site by site basis, PDI may be able to select prostate cancer sites at biopsy, in particular in patients without abnormal DRE findings.     

Repeat biopsy of the suspicious prostate cancer: especially the usefulness of MRI

Among patients with negative initial biopsies of the prostate, 51 patients underwent total 59 repeat biopsies at the Department of Urology of Ikeda Municipal Hospital between January 1998 and April 2004. Overall 26 patients (44.1%) were confirmed to have cancer, 22 patients by second repeat biopsy (22/51), four patients by third biopsy (4/7) and none by fourth biopsy (0/1). Clinical parameters (age, PSA, PSA density, PSA velocity) were analyzed for the possibility to predict the pathological outcome. Significant differences between the positive biopsy group and the negative biopsy group were obtained in age, PSA level and prostatic volume. Of the diagnostic evaluations including palpation and imaging studies (DRE, TRUS, MRI), the most powerful predictor for prostate cancer seemed to be the MRI findings, especially in the cases of short-interval repeat biopsy. Biopsies directed at the positive lesion on MRI in addition to systematic prostate biopsies should be useful.     

Community‐based prostate cancer screening in Japan: Predicting factors for positive repeat biopsy

Objectives: To assess possible predictors in determining criteria for repeat biopsy in a prostate cancer screening population. Methods: A total of 50 207 men over 55 years‐of‐age have participated in a prostate cancer screening program in Otokuni, Kyoto, Japan for 12 years. Transperineal systematic biopsy was carried out in case of positive digital rectal examination (DRE) or positive transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) or a prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) value greater than 10.0 ng/mL. For those with a PSA level from 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL, and negative DRE and TRUS findings, biopsy was indicated only when PSA density (PSAD) was greater than 0.15. The same indication was applied for the repeat biopsy. Results: A repeat biopsy after an interval of more than 2 years was carried out in 140 patients and was positive in 50 (36%) patients. The PSA value at the diagnosis of cancer declined from the initial value in six (12%) patients. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, PSA velocity (PSAV) as well as PSAD and DRE findings at latest screening were independent predictors for positive repeat‐biopsy outcome. The odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of PSAV >0.48, latest PSAD >0.33 and positive latest DRE were 4.17 (1.05–18.5), 4.15 (1.31–14.0), and 3.62 (1.06–13.2), respectively. A combination of three variables defined as positive if any of these were positive, reduced 31% of unnecessary biopsies while missing 8% of low volume, low grade cancers. Conclusions: A combination of latest PSAD, PSAV and positive DRE at latest screening might help to reduce unnecessary repeat biopsies in high‐risk patients with an initial negative biopsy.     

Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and an initially negative biopsy

PURPOSE: Almost 75% of men with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml have no evidence of prostate cancer on biopsy. Deciding whether and when to repeat the biopsy is challenging. We determined if patient specific variables might identify men at increased risk for the subsequent detection of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 24,893 men from a community based prostate cancer screening study. Our study group consisted of 1,202 men with PSA 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and a previously negative prostate biopsy. Patient specific variables were analyzed for their value in predicting a future diagnosis of prostate cancer. RESULTS: Of 1,011 men with adequate followup 136 (13.5%) were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Mean followup +/- SD in men without prostate cancer was 72 +/- 36 months. Prostate cancer was subsequently diagnosed in 35% of men with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on initial biopsy (p <0.0001), in 18% with abnormal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) (p = 0.02) and 16% with an annual PSA velocity of 0 ng/ml (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified HGPIN, initial PSA 3.6 to 4.0 ng/ml, abnormal DRE, family history of prostate cancer and annual PSA velocity 0 ng/ml as predictors of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Men with a PSA of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and negative biopsy should be advised to undergo repeat biopsy if they have HGPIN, initial PSA 3.6 to 4.0 ng/ml, abnormal DRE, a family history of prostate cancer or a PSA velocity of 0 ng/ml or greater.     

血清PSA密度变化对前列腺癌高危人群的诊断价值

目的:探讨前列腺特异抗原(PSA)、前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)变化对前列腺癌高危人群的诊断价值。方法:对初次活检阴性的432例患者进行随访,其中79例重复穿刺活检,确诊前列腺癌27例(34.2%),消化道来源肿瘤1例,BPH25例,前列腺上皮内肿瘤(PIN)13例,慢性前列腺炎13例。对重复活检患者的PSA、PSAD等临床资料进行统计分析。结果:配对t检验显示,良性病变首末次穿刺前PSA、PSAD差异均无统计学意义,而前列腺癌末次穿刺前PSA、PSAD较首次穿刺前升高,差异有统计学意义。以PSA>4ng/ml筛选前列腺癌,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为92.5%、17.6%、37.6%,PSA末-PSA首>0筛选前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为85.2%、41.2%、40.4%;而以PSAD末-PSAD首>0筛选前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为81.5%、54.9%、48.9%。结论:在前列腺癌高危人群中应该重复穿刺,以减少漏诊;以PSAD动态升高来指导穿刺,可以明显提高阳性率。     

Examination for indication of systematic biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND: Systematic biopsy has been commonly used for detection of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, as this examination occasionally gives patients severe complications it is necessary to give careful consideration for application of this examination. Thus, we analyzed retrospectively 145 cases who underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guided systematic biopsy to evaluate the application of systematic biopsy, correlating with the findings of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate specific antigen (PSA), the findings of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and the results of biopsies. METHODS: Between May, 1995 and May, 1997, 143 patients who were suspected to have prostate cancer with either of PSA and DRE, and 2 patients who received visual laser ablation of prostate (VLAP), underwent TRUS guided systematic biopsy of prostate. We evaluated diagnostic efficacy of PSA, DRE, TRUS, prostate-volume-specific PSA, and PSA density (PSAD). RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (P.P.V.) are 78.4%, 62.8% and 53.5% for DRE, 100.0%, 4.4% and 41.8% for PSA, 88.2%, 60.0% and 52.9% for TRUS, 87.8%, 72.1% and 64.2% for prostate-volume-specific PSA, 100.0%, 30.6% and 45.4% for PSAD, respectively. Ten of 69 patients (14.5%) whose PSA levels were 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml were diagnosed as cancer, and positive for both or either of DRE and TRUS. Twenty-seven who were negative for both of DRE and TRUS were not diagnosed as prostate cancer. Using the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS, we could eliminate 29 non-cancer men (21.5%) whose PSA level was greater than 4.0 ng/ml from systematic biopsy. CONCLUSION: On the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS is very useful to exclude unnecessary systematic biopsy, if an urologist could be used to and trained for DRE and TRUS.     

Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previously

The aim of this study is to evaluate the proportion of repeat biopsies after 7 years in men with an initial benign six- or ten-core biopsy as well as the incidence of prostate cancer (PC) in the repeat biopsies. In this retrospective longitudinal study, 116 men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) who have had a benign prostate biopsy between January 1997 and September 1997 were included. Fifty-eight men had an initial benign six-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.3–67) (group A), and 58 men had an initial benign ten-core biopsy (median PSA 7.5 ng/ml, range 0.8–91.4) (group B). We analysed men with a pathological PSA velocity, a persistently elevated PSA, an abnormal DRE, a high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, or atypical small acinar proliferation as indication for rebiopsy. Furthermore, we analysed a subgroup with exclusively an increased PSA velocity (>0.75 ng/ml per year) as indication for rebiopsy. In group A, 14 men had a follow-up biopsy. In this group, follow-up biopsies yielded PC in eight men (13.8%), six (10.3%) had a negative follow-up biopsy. In contrast, in group B only four men (3.4%) had a follow-up biopsy (P=0.005). Two of them (3.4%) had PC (P=0.02), two cases (3.4%) showed a benign histology (P=0.06). The use of an extended biopsy protocol at the initial evaluation reduces the number of repeat biopsies required and decreases the number of PC detection in the follow-up biopsy cohort.     

Diagnostic value of percent free prostate-specific antigen: retrospective analysis of a population-based screening study with emphasis on men with PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively investigate the use of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) compared with total PSA in serum as predictor of prostate cancer in men selected randomly from the general population who underwent biopsy on the basis of abnormal findings on digital rectal examination (DRE) or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and/or serum PSA levels greater than 10 ng/mL. METHODS: A single intervention, population-based screening study was undertaken in 1988 and 1989. Of the 2400 men aged 55 to 70 years invited to participate, 1782 men responded and were examined with DRE, TRUS, and PSA testing (Tandem-Hybritech). In 1995, frozen serum samples from 1748 men were analyzed for percent free PSA (Prostatus, Wallac OY). Five-year follow-up data on new cancers in the screened population were obtained from the Swedish Cancer Registry (SCR). RESULTS: Of the 1748 men, 367 underwent TRUS-guided biopsies because of abnormal findings on either DRE or TRUS or serum PSA levels of greater than 10 ng/mL. This resulted in the diagnosis of 64 cases of prostate cancer (3.7%). PSA levels of 3.0 ng/mL or greater were found in 55 (86%) of 64 cancer cases and in 399 (24%) of the 1684 benign cases. Among the 1294 men with PSA less than 3.0 ng/mL, 9 prostate cancers were diagnosed (14% of all prostate cancers). All 9 patients with cancer and with PSA less than 3.0 ng/mL had a percent free PSA of 18% or less. In the group of 1109 patients with PSA less than 3.0 ng/mL and a percent free PSA greater than 18%, 159 biopsies were performed because of abnormal DRE or TRUS. However, no prostate cancer was diagnosed in this category of patients. Five years after the screening intervention, 7 more cases of prostate cancer were clinically diagnosed in the screened population according to the SCR. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PSA levels less than 3.0 ng/mL and percent free PSA greater than 18% defines a large part of the population at a very low risk of cancer of the prostate both at the time of screening and during the following 5 years. Men in this group may be spared DRE, and longer screening intervals may be considered. However, the risk of having prostate cancer is not negligible in men with PSA less than 3.0 ng/mL and percent free PSA of 18% or less. The results of this study indicate that biopsy should be recommended to men fulfilling these criteria, although these results should be confirmed in larger prospective studies because of the limited number of patients with prostate cancer in the present series.     

USEFULNESS OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, TRANSRECTAL ULTRAS ONOGRAPHY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER

The detection rate of organ-confined prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate, as well as the value of a directed, guided transrectal core biopsy for the prostate (TRUS-guided biopsy) combined with systematic biopsy, were evaluated. The subjects were 171 patients with urinary symptoms suggestive of prostatic disease excluding those with clinical stage C and D prostate cancer. Twenty-five patients (14.6%) had prostate cancer, 127 (74.2%) had benign prostate hypertrophy, four (2.3%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, eleven (6.4%) had inflammation, and four (2.3%) had normal prostate tissue. The incidence of detection of hypoechoic findings by TRUS in the patients in whom nodules were detected by DRE or who had elevated serum PSA was higher than that in patients with negative diagnostic findings. In 22 of the 25 patients with prostate cancer, the cancer was detected by recognition of a hypoechoic area on TRUS. In 10 of these 22 patients, prostate cancer was also detected by systematic biopsy in isoechoic areas. Prostate cancer was detected by systematic biopsy in three patients without hypoechoic findings. The positive predictive value for patients with abnormal findings on all three tests was 64.3%, which is significantly higher than that for patients with any other combination of findings (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the combination of DRE, serum PSA and TRUS is useful for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer, and that TRUS and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy combined with systematic biopsy should be performed in patients with abnormal findings for both DRE and PSA. Our results also demonstrate that systematic biopsy is useful for the detention of prostate cancer from the isoechoic area visualized by TRUS.     

Diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostatic fossa in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostatic fossa in men with biochemical relapse following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP). Thirty patients, with detectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) and negative imaging for metastases after RP, were evaluated for local recurrence. All patients underwent TRUS-guided biopsies of the prostatic fossa, with at least six cores obtained. PSA and digital rectal examination (DRE) were correlated with biopsy results. Twelve patients (40%) were found with local recurrence. Sensitivities of TRUS and DRE were 75 and 50%, while specificities were 83 and 100%, respectively. Local recurrence was detected in 25% of the patients with PSA ≤ 1 ng/ml, and higher PSA levels were correlated with an increased positive biopsy rate. All patients with positive DRE had positive biopsy and positive TRUS as well. When both TRUS and DRE were positive it was more likely for the patient to have positive biopsy than when both TRUS and DRE were negative. TRUS-guided biopsy is an efficient tool in detecting local recurrence after RP and should be offered to all patients with biochemical relapse and absence of metastatic disease irrespective of the level of PSA.     

Indication of repeat prostatic biopsy following previous negative findings

BACKGROUND: Many men with clinically suspicious findings would not be diagnosed to have prostate cancer. Establishing criteria for indicating repeat biopsy is imperative for early detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: Eighty-one patients underwent repeat prostatic biopsies under sonographic guidance at Kitasato University Hospital between March 1992 and October 1996. Clinicopathological parameters such as age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA adjusted for transition zone volume (PSAT), PSA density (PSAD), PSA velocity, transition zone volume, prostatic volume, rectal findings, ultrasound findings and initial biopsy histology were compared with the results of repeat biopsy for searching for possible predictors of positive biopsy. RESULTS: Cancer was confirmed in 14 patients (17.3%), 10 patients by the second biopsy (15.4%, 10/65) and 4 patients by the third biopsy (28.6%, 4/14). No cancer was found at the 4th or more biopsies. Twelve (85.7%) of these patients had prostatic volume less than 40 cm3. Univariate analysis indicated PSAT, PSAD, transition zone volume and prostatic volume to be more frequent in men with positive biopsies (p < 0.05). But multivariate logistic regression analysis failed to identify any significant predictors of positive results in repeat biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: No clinicopathological parameters could reliably predict repeat biopsy findings. One or 2 additional sets of biopsies is recommended based on clinical judgement (symptoms, life expectancy, small glands < or = 40 cm3 etc.) for the purpose of early detection of prostate cancer in patients with previously negative biopsy but still with suspicious findings in consideration of approximately 20% false negative rates by the initial biopsy.     

Outcome of laterally directed sextant biopsies of the prostate in screened males aged 50--66 years. Implications for sampling order.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer has its most frequent location in the posterior-lateral part of the gland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cancer detection rate of six systemic prostate biopsies with mid lobar biopsies taken far laterally in the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 692 patients (aged 50--66 years) enrolled in a screening study underwent prostate biopsies because of an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA; > or =3 ng/ml) level. The outcome of the biopsies was related to findings at digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and to the location within the prostate. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 164 patients. DRE and TRUS were suspicious of malignancy in 66 cases (40%) and 84 cases (51%), respectively. The two biopsies taken far laterally midlobar in the prostate detected as many as 83% of the cancers and when combined with two apical biopsies, 96% of all cancers were detected. CONCLUSION: At PSA screening in this age-group, only 57% of the prostate cancers detectable by sextant biopsies were palpable or visible at TRUS. Most of the cancers (96%) were detectable by only four systematic, carefully directed biopsies. In men with normal DRE, the two lateral midlobar biopsies should be taken first during the biopsy procedure.     

Serendipity in detecting disease in low prostate-specific antigen ranges

OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude of prostate cancer detection by serendipity (the coincidental detection of prostate cancer during the evaluation of an abnormal screening test result) when a digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) are used as initial screening tests for prostate cancer in men with low levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 0.0-3.9 ng/mL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 117 participants of a population-based screening study were diagnosed with prostate cancer after a standard evaluation of an abnormal screening test result; 49 underwent radical prostatectomy. Serendipity was defined as either: (i) the presence of prostate cancer opposite to the side that raised suspicion for cancer on DRE and/or TRUS; (ii) a negative lesion-directed biopsy while cancer was present in one or more of the cores of the sextant biopsy; (iii) a tumour volume of < 0.5 mL on radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Depending on the definition, 27-63% of prostate cancers detected at low PSA values were detected coincidentally and not as a result of a true-positive test result. The proportion of cancers detected by serendipity was inversely correlated with serum PSA level. CONCLUSION: A relatively high proportion of prostate cancers diagnosed in men with low PSA levels, and in which a biopsy was prompted by a suspicious DRE and/or TRUS, are considered to be detected by chance only. As these cancers are mostly small (< 0.5 mL), with potentially low biological aggressiveness, relying on serendipity seems disadvantageous in prostate-cancer screening. The level of serendipity in prostate cancer detection, the poor performance of the screening test, and high inter-observer variability, casts further doubt on the utility of DRE (and TRUS) as initial screening tests for prostate cancer in population-based screening.     

Stellenwert der Elastographie in der klinischen Diagnostik des lokalisierten Prostatakarzinoms

BACKROUND: To assess whether elastography guided prostate biopsies improve the cancer detection in men with suspected prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 351 prospectively randomized patients underwent prostate biopsies for the first time. The indication for biopsy was abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) in 25% or suspicious prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation in 75%. In the elastography group (n=189) and the control group (n=162), we assessed PSA, DRE, and B-mode transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Both groups underwent classic TRUS-guided 10-core biopsy. The elastography patients underwent additional elastographic examination prior to biopsy using a Voluson 730 ultrasound system (GE Medical). According to the ultrasound or elastographic findings for each biopsy location, the researcher tried to predict whether cancer was present. This prediction was correlated with histopathologic findings. The statistical power of this study was sufficient to detect a 15% difference in detection rate. RESULTS: The study groups did not differ in PSA, clinical stages, or prostate volume (p<0.05). The overall cancer detection rate was 39% (137/351): 40.2% (76/189) in the elastography group and 37.7% (61/189) in the control group, respectively. The difference in detection rate in clinical stages T2 and T3 between the elastography and the control groups was not statistically significant (p<0.05). Within the T1c subgroup, elastography showed a slightly higher detection rate of 55.6% versus 50% without reaching statistical significance (p>0.05). Histopathologic findings were adequately predicted by elastography in only 44.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Elastography did not improve the cancer detection rate in our collective.     

Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 10+ systematic sampling technique when performing transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, compared with the sextant biopsy technique for patients with suspected prostate cancer. METHODS: 286 patients with suspected prostate cancer were included in the study. Patients were eligible for the study if they had serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml or ratio PSA <0.25 and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). The population sample was divided in three groups: (1) those with positive PSA, PSA ratio and DRE (70 patients); (2) those with positive PSA and PSA ratio but normal DRE (178 patients), and (3) those with positive PSA and PSA ratio, positive PSA velocity and a negative biopsy in the previous 6-month period (38 patients). In addition to the conventional sextant prostate biopsy cores, four more biopsies were obtained from the lateral peripheral zone (10 core biopsy protocol). Additional cores (total of 12-14) were also randomly selected in case of larger prostates (>60 ml) or from suspicious foci revealed by transrectal ultrasound. All additional biopsy cores were submitted separately to the pathological department. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 55.7% (39/70) and 69% (48/70) of the patients (for sextant core and for the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the first study group, 11% (20/178) and 23% (41/178) of the patients (for the sextant and the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the second study group, and 42% (16/38) and 63% (24/38) of the patients (for the sextant and the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the third study group. The addition of the lateral peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate to the sextant biopsy showed a 23, 105 and 50% increase in the number of cancers diagnosed in the first, second and third study groups, respectively. The improvement of cancer detection rate (sensitivity) was statistically significant for all groups evaluated. CONCLUSION: The 10+ systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsy improves the detection rate of prostate cancer compared to the sextant biopsy technique alone, especially when performed in men with positive PSA, PSA ratio, and negative DRE.     

Multiple vesico-urethral biopsies following radical prostatectomy: the predictive roles of TRUS, DRE, PSA and the pathological stage

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to verify the predictive role of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of prostatic fossa, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and pathological stage after radical prostectomy in the detection of a prostate tumor recurrence at the level of the vesico-urethral anastomosis by means of multiple TRUS biopsies (6-8 cores).MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 1997, following a radical prostatectomy, 119 consecutive patients (median age: 67.9 years) with a PSA>or=0.2 ng/ml (median PSA: 0.9 ng/ml) underwent DRE and TRUS examinations with a 5.0-7.5 MHz variable frequency end-fire probe (Hitachi Medical System) and an EUB-525 machine. All patients received six TRUS-guided biopsies of the vesico-urethral anastomosis, and 1-2 additional biopsies directed to hypo-echoic or suspicious areas, if detected by TRUS.RESULTS: Biopsies revealed recurrent carcinoma in 50% of patients (60/119). TRUS proved more sensitive than DRE (75% vs. 50%; p=0.01) and, conversely, DRE proved more specific than a TRUS (85% vs. 66%; p=0.03). Cancer was detected in 45% of the 34 patients with a PSAor=2.0 ng/ml (24 patients), TRUS was able to detect every biopsy-proven local recurrence lesion (sensitivity: 100%). Conversely, all patients with a PSA>or=2.0 ng/ml and a negative TRUS had a negative biopsy (negative predictive value: 100%). In a multi-variable logistical analysis, the most predictive parameters determining a positive biopsy rate among those values studied (PSA, DRE, TRUS, positive surgical margins, pathological stage and time to PSA elevation) were TRUS and DRE findings (p=0.003, with an odds ratio of 4.6 and p=0.02, with an odds ratio of 4.1, respectively).CONCLUSION: TRUS and TRUS biopsies utilizing 6-8 cores are efficient tools in the detection of local recurrence after a radical prostatectomy, even with a PSAor=2.0 ng/ml and a negative TRUS, a biopsy of the vesico-urethral anastomosis could be avoided since the negative predictive value is 100%. Cancer recurrence detection seems to be predicted by TRUS and DRE findings, but not by PSA levels, pathological stage, status of the surgical margins or time to PSA elevation.