A phase I study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine combined with monthly, fixed-dose docetaxel. METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were treated with docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 every 28 days. Gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 and underwent dose adjustment in cohorts of 3-6 patients. At the maximum tolerated dose, 11 additional patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received 85 cycles of therapy. At the first dose level, the planned gemcitabine dose on Days 1, 8, and 15 was 800 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at this dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) requiring the reduction of gemcitabine to 600 mg/m(2) per dose and the administration of ciprofloxacin, 500 mg orally twice daily, on Days 8-18. At the second dose level the first 3 patients experienced no DLTs and the dose of gemcitabine was increased to 700 mg/m(2). Two of the 6 patients treated at the 700 mg/m(2) dose level experienced DLTs. Eleven additional patients were enrolled at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2)). At this dose level, Grade 3/4 (according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria) neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5% and 2.1% of cycles, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon. Three of seven evaluable patients with pancreatic carcinoma had evidence of significant antineoplastic activity (three partial responses). In addition, two complete responses (one patient with gastric carcinoma and one patient with ovarian carcinoma) and one partial response (patient with hepatocellular carcinoma) were noted in patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen comprised of docetaxel, 60 mg/m(2), on Day 1 and gemcitabine, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 8, and 15 with ciprofloxacin on Days 8-18 every 28 days is safe, well tolerated, and active.     

A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a novel, oral, selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine with proven activity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer, with a view to replacing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients received capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (2500 mg/m2/day) for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest, for up to six cycles. RESULTS: Capecitabine produced an objective response rate of 34% (all partial responses) and stable disease in 14 patients (30%). The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-6.4 months] and median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 6.9-13.2 months). Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea, anorexia, diarrhea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. While HFS was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria), only 9% of patients experienced grade 3 HFS. Severe myelosuppression was not reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine monotherapy is active and well tolerated as first-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Larger comparative trials investigating capecitabine-based combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer are warranted.     

Phase I study of 3-weekly docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Adding docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) significantly improved clinical efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). To further improve the efficacy and tolerability, we substituted oxaliplatin for cisplatin and capecitabine for 5-FU in the DCF regimen and performed a phase I study to determine the recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (DXO) combination in patients with AGC.

Materials and methods

Previously untreated patients with histologically proven metastatic AGC and ECOG performance status 0–2 were enrolled. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered i.v. on day 1. Capecitabine was administered orally bid on days 1–14. Each cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first two cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty-one patients were enrolled: 15 patients in dose-escalation phase and 6 patients in the extension at the RD. Median age was 50 years (range 21–65 years). At dose level 3 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 1,000 mg/m² capecitabine, 100 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 1 diarrhea (DLT) was found among 6 patients while at dose level 4 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 800 mg/m² capecitabine, 130 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia and diarrhea) were observed among 3 patients. Therefore, the dose level 3 was determined as RD. DLTs include grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. Cumulative (all cycles) grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (75%), leucopenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (25%), diarrhea (17%), and neuropathy (17%). Of 14 patients with measurable lesions, 11 achieved partial response and 3 showed stable disease.

Conclusion

The RD of the DXO regimen in patients with AGC is capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, in combination with decetaxel 60 mg/m² (day 1) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² (day 1) repeated every 3 weeks. The DXO regimen seems to have promising activity and offers an easy alternative to DCF. The toxicities appear to be still substantial, but manageable.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Background. This phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of a low dose of docetaxel plus a standard dose of cisplatin for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. Eligibility criteria included metastatic disease (stage IV) of NSCLC and a performance status (PS) of 0-2. Cisplatin 80 mg/m² was given i.v. on day 1 and docetaxel 60 mg/m² was given i.v. on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. Results. Forty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and the median age was 63 years. Forty-two patients (93%) had a PS of 0-1 and 38 (84%) received two to four courses of chemotherapy. The principal toxicity was neutropenia, and grade 3/4 occurred in 36%/49%. Other hematologic toxicities were mild. Of the 45 patients, subsequent chemotherapy was delayed due to toxicities in only 5 patients (11%), and dose modifications were needed in only 3 patients (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Non-hematological toxicities were relatively mild. Allergy (2%), skin rash (11%), edema (9%), and neuropathy (9%) occurred infrequently, and all were grade 1 toxicity. Of the 45 patients, 19 showed partial response, giving a response rate of 42%. The median survival time was 43.3 weeks, and the 1-year survival rate of all patients was 38.7%. Conclusion. This cisplatin/docetaxel combination chemotherapy is an active and non-toxic regimen in patients with metastatic NSCLC, a result which suggests that the combination may be suitable for randomized controlled trials. Received: February 24, 2000 / Accepted: June 2, 2000     

A phase I study of vinflunine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes

Purpose  

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), safety and efficacy of vinflunine when combined with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, with pharmacokinetic blood sampling to test potential drug–drug interactions.     

A phase I, dose-escalation study of pomalidomide (CC-4047) in combination with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreas cancer

Introduction

Pomalidomide is an investigational immunomodulating drug (IMiD®) that also inhibits angiogenesis and has direct anti-tumour effects. This phase I study was performed to identify the optimal dose of pomalidomide to be used in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients had histologically documented metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. No prior gemcitabine for metastatic disease or for primary treatment of locally advanced disease was allowed although prior radiation therapy with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer was allowed. All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Pomalidomide was administered orally on days 1−21 at doses escalated from 2 to 10 mg daily. Patients were re-evaluated every 8 weeks; treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 (87%) and 1 (13%). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 10 mg/day on days 1−21. Neutropaenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (38%); other grade 3/4 toxicity included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (22%) and anaemia (9%). While efficacy was not a primary end-point of this study, 3 of 20 evaluable patients (15%) had partial responses and 10 patients (50%) had >50% decrease in CA 19-9 levels.

Conclusions

The combination of pomalidomide and gemcitabine was feasible and safe in most patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Neutropaenia, the dose-limiting toxicity, was brief and reversible. Intermittent dosing of pomalidomide allowed substantially higher doses than were previously reported with a continuous schedule. This combination merits further evaluation in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

多西他赛联合希罗达治疗蒽环类失败复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效评价

背景与目的:随着蒽环类药物在乳腺癌治疗中的广泛应用,对蒽环类耐药患者日渐增多,如何治疗蒽环类耐药的复发转移性乳腺癌已成为临床难题.本研究初步探讨了多西他赛联合希罗达治疗蒽环类药物治疗失败的复发转移性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性.方法:回顾性分析64例蒽环类药物治疗失败的复发转移性乳腺癌患者接受多西他赛联合希罗达方案的治疗情况.其中多西他赛75 mg/m2,静脉滴注第1天;希罗达1250 mg/m2,口服,每日2次,第1～14天,每21 d为1个周期.每2个周期评价疗效同时记录不良事件.结果:对64例患者评价疗效,完全缓解(CR)6例,部分缓解(PR)33例,有效率(CR+PR)60.9%(39/64):64例患者可评价不良反应,无严重不良事件导致死亡的患者,主要的不良反应为乏力、骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应和黏膜炎等,其中粒细胞减少Ⅲ～Ⅳ度为45.8%.结论:多西他赛联合希罗达是治疗蒽环类失败复发转移性乳腺癌的有效方案,其不良反应能够耐受.     

Phase I study of docetaxel and cisplatin for patients with previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Japanese cooperative study

Background. Docetaxel is one of the most active agents used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. This phase I study was performed to determine the toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and to recommend a dose for phase II study. Methods. Patients were required to have previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, be aged between 15 and 74 years, to have a measurable lesion, and to have adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of 1-h infusion of docetaxel on day 1, followed by 2-h infusion of cisplatin (3 h after docetaxel) at the following docetaxel/cisplatin (mg/m²) dose levels: 50/50, 60/50, 60/60, 60/70, and 60/80. At least three patients were accrued at each dose level. Treatment was repeated every 3 to 4 weeks for responders. Administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was permitted when leukocytopenia or neutropenia of grade 3 or more occurred. Results. Of the 29 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and response, but 2 were excluded from analyses of dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose. Neutropenia (grade 4, for 3 days or more; n = 1), hepatic dysfunction (grade 3 or more; n = 2) and renal dysfunction (grade 2 or more; n = 3) were observed as dose-limiting toxicities. However, the maximum tolerated dose was not detected, even at the highest dose examined. Tumor response occurred in 13 of the 29 patients (45%; 95% confidence interval; 26%–64%). The pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel and cisplatin (n = 17) were similar to those observed after the administration of each dose as a single agent. Conclusion. Docetaxel/cisplatin doses of 60/80 mg/m² were recommended for phase II study, because grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 50% or more patients at docetaxel/cisplatin dose levels of 60/60 mg/m² and above, and the doses of these drugs were restricted to within the approved dose ranges for single-agent use in Japan. The responses observed in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination against previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and warrant a phase II study at the recommended dose level. Received: February 29, 2000 / Accepted: June 22, 2000     

Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with metastatic melanoma previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy

A phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with malignant melanoma. Between April 1992 and February 1996, 37 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and no prior chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg m^-2 administered intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days. Patients were premedicated prior to each course with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. Toxicity and follow-up were provided. Objective responses were seen in two out of 35 patients evaluable for response, one complete response and one partial response. These two responses were of a duration of greater than two years. The most common toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 92% of patients; 49% required hospitalization for an episode of neutropenic fever. Additional patients had reversible grade 3–4 toxicities including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, arthralgias, myalgias, peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Eighteen patients had hypersensitivity reactions, two were grade 3–4. Fluid retention, grade 1–3 was observed in seven patients. Alopecia occurred in most patients. Docetaxel has definite but low-level activity against malignant melanoma. Further investigation of this drug should be considered in multidrug combination programs.     

A phase I study of a 24 hour infusion of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of gemcitabine when given as a 24 h infusion to patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 24 patients with unresectable stage IIIa-IV NSCLC were entered into the study. Gemcitabine was administered as a 24 h infusion on days 0, 7 and 14. Courses of therapy were repeated every 28 days. There were 16 males and 8 females with a median age of 51 years (range 40-73 years). The WHO performance score was 1 (21 patients) or 2 (3 patients). The TNM stage was IIIa (6), IIIb (10) and IV (8). Three patients were entered at each dose level with six at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose levels were 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 180 and 210 mg m-2. The MTD was 180 mg m-2 and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia and lethargy. Partial response was observed in five (21%) patients (95% CI 7-42%) lasting 10, 14, 18, 47 and 51 + weeks. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given as a 24 h infusion was 180 mg m-2.     

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus capecitabine in metastatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and gemcitabine given as fixed dose rate (FDR) has not been demonstrated to be well tolerated in phase I previous studies. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of this combination and to describe the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLT) and the safety profile of this way of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 650 mg/m(2) bis in die (b.i.d.) for 14 consecutive days. Gemcitabine was administered at FDR of 10 mg/m(2) per min in escalating durations of infusion on days 1 and 8. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All 20 patients enrolled into the study were assessable for toxicity. Only one out of the first six patients treated at FDR gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m(2) met protocol-specified DLT criteria (grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=7 days) during the first two cycles. At these doses the majority of cycles of therapy were, however, delivered without dose reduction or delay. Another similar episode of DLT was observed at the same dose step among the following eight included patients. The dose of FDR gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) in 80 min on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) b.i.d., for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest is recommended for further study. CONCLUSION: The combination of FDR gemcitabine plus capecitabine can be administered with acceptable toxicity. The evidence of antitumor activity deserves further investigation in phase II combination chemotherapy studies.     

A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer

BackgroundRigosertib (ON 01910.Na), a first-in-class Ras mimetic and small-molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling pathways including polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), has shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. In this study, rigosertib was assessed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Materials and methodsPatients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus rigosertib 1800 mg/m² via 2-h continuous IV infusions given twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (RIG + GEM) versus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle (GEM).ResultsA total of 160 patients were enrolled globally and randomly assigned to RIG + GEM (106 patients) or GEM (54). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (8% in the RIG + GEM group versus 6% in the GEM group), hyponatremia (17% versus 4%), and anemia (8% versus 4%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months for RIG + GEM versus 6.4 months for GEM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85–1.81]. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for both groups (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68–1.36). The partial response rate was 19% versus 13% for RIG + GEM versus GEM, respectively. Of 64 tumor samples sent for molecular analysis, 47 were adequate for multiplex genetic testing and 41 were positive for mutations. The majority of cases had KRAS gene mutations (40 cases). Other mutations detected included TP53 (13 cases) and PIK3CA (1 case). No correlation between mutational status and efficacy was detected.ConclusionsThe combination of RIG + GEM failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival or response compared with GEM in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rigosertib showed a similar safety profile to that seen in previous trials using the IV formulation.     

A phase II open-label study of DHA-paclitaxel (Taxoprexin) by 2-h intravenous infusion in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Purpose Combination chemotherapy regimens can improve survival in patients with advanced gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel is a novel conjugate formed by the covalent linkage of the fatty acid DHA to paclitaxel and may result in increased tumour exposure to paclitaxel without increased toxicity. Patients and methods In this single arm, phase II study of DHA-paclitaxel, eligible patients with previously untreated, inoperable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or stomach were treated with DHA-paclitaxel (1,100 mg/m²) administered by 2-h intravenous infusion every 21 days. Results Fifty-four patients were recruited of whom 53 were evaluable for toxicity, and 48 for response. There were five confirmed partial responses (9.4%) by the RECIST criteria. The median duration of response was 87 days (range 49–97 days), the median time to progression was 84 days (95% CI 78–124 days), and median overall survival was 262 days (95% CI 205–357 days). Grade ≥3 neutropaenia occurred in 93% of patients, and febrile neutropaenia in 17% of patients. Conclusions DHA-paclitaxel has modest activity in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer and with haematological toxicity that is comparable to paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

A phase II study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: This open-label, multicenter phase II study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus gemcitabine combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 63 patients who received capecitabine 830 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-21 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients had partial responses giving an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-34%) in the intent-to-treat population. The median time to progression and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI 3.5-5.7) and 7.5 months (95% CI 5.0-10.0), respectively, and 1-year survival rate was 27.1% in the intent-to-treat population. Capecitabine plus gemcitabine was well tolerated. Grade 3 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (2%); the only grade 4 hematological events were anemia (2%) and neutropenia (6%). Non-hematological adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal events and hand-foot syndrome, which affected 16% of patients. Grade 3/4 non-hematological events were infrequent. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine plus gemcitabine appears to be active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.