军人心理创伤后应激障碍与适应障碍患者及健康军人的关联性负变比较

目的 探讨军人心理创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与适应障碍(AD)患者的关联性负变(CNV)变异。方法 应用美国NicoletBravo脑诱发电位仪,采用光和声成对刺激以及反应时间技术,记录了23例FISD患者、24例AID患者与30名健康军人(NC)的CNV,并进行了比较。结果 PTSD组波形不规则;PISD组、AD组及NC组在指令信号后负变化(PINV)、潜伏期M1、波幅M2上有显著性差异(P<0.05-0.01);与NC组相比,PTSD组波幅增高和潜伏期延迟;PISD组的PINV出现率明显高于AD组。结论 CNV是评定FISD患者和AD患者大脑综合功能的有效工具,在临床上值得进一步推广应用。     

轻度认知功能障碍老年人和阿尔茨海默病关联性负变的比较

目的探讨轻度认知功能障碍老年人(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的关联性负变(CNV)变异.方法应用美国NicoletBravo脑诱发电位仪,采用光和声成对刺激以及反应时间技术,记录了36例MCI患者的CNV,并与45例健康老人(NC)和30例AD患者的CNV进行比较.结果 MCI和AD组波形不规则,CNV-Ⅱ型尤甚.MCI组、AD组及NC组在命令信号后负变化(PINV)、潜伏期M2、波幅M1及反应时间(RT)上差异有显著性(P＜0.05～0.01).与NC组相比,AD组波幅降低和潜伏期延迟.MCI组PINV出现率明显高于NC组.结论 CNV是评定MCI患者和AD患者大脑综合功能的有效工具,在临床上值得进一步推广应用.     

情感性障碍患者的条件负变化

目的 探讨情感性障碍与正常成人在条件负变化(CNV)检测中的不同表现.方法 应用光和声两种成对刺激,对29例情感性障碍患者和27例正常成人的CNV作了检测.结果 显示躁狂相组患者波幅B增高(P＜0.01),抑郁相组患者A-S'2面积缩小(P＜0.01),PINV潜伏期延长(P＜0.05),并且抑郁相单相组比双相组的PINV潜伏期显著延长(P＜0.01).结论 CNV和指令信号后负变化等提示PINV潜伏期延长可能是抑郁相单相患者的素质标记,而CNV波幅的变化则可能是情感性障碍患者的状态标记.     

抑郁症、焦虑症患者事件相关电位对照研究

目的:探讨抑郁症、焦虑症患者脑诱发电位的变异特点及临床应用价值.方法:共有46例抑郁症患者(抑郁症组)、41例焦虑症患者(焦虑症组)及42名健康志愿者(正常组),使用美国Nicolet Bravo脑电生理仪进行事件相关电位P300(P300)和关联性负变化(CNV)的检测.并于治疗2个月时对两患者组进行相同项目的随访.结果:与治疗前比较,抑郁症组P300靶N2、P3潜伏期缩短(P＜0.05),靶P3波幅升高(P＜0.01),CNV潜伏期M1缩短(P＜0.01),波幅M1、M2升高(P均＜0.05).焦虑症组P300靶P3潜伏期缩短(P＜0.05),CNV波幅M1下降(P＜0.05),指令信号后负变化(PINV)的出现率下降(P＜0.05).治疗后与正常组比较,抑郁症组P300非靶P2波幅偏低(P＜0.01),P300的双峰P2波和CNV的PINV出现率均偏高(P＜0.05～0.01);焦虑症组CNV的潜伏期M2缩短(P＜0.01).抑郁症组与焦虑症组治疗后比较在P300非靶P2波幅、双峰P2波出现率,CNV潜伏期M2和PINV出现率等指标之间差异有显著性(P均＜0.01).结论:抑郁症、焦虑症患者脑诱发电位有自己的变异特点,在诊断和鉴别诊断方面有一定的价值.     

焦虑症、抑郁症的关联性负变

目的 探讨焦虑症(AD)和抑郁症的关联性负变(CNV)变异.方法 应用Nicolet Bravo脑诱发电位仪,采用光和声成对刺激以及反应时间技术,记录了37例AD患者的CNV,并与36例健康成人(NC)和32例抑郁症患者的CNV进行比较.结果 AD和抑郁症组波形不规则,CNV-Ⅱ型尤甚.AD组、抑郁症组及NC组在潜伏期M2及波幅M1、M2差异有显著性(P＜0.05～0.01).与NC组相比,抑郁症组波幅降低和潜伏期延迟.AD组呈同样趋势.结论 CNV是评定AD患者和抑郁症患者大脑综合功能的有效工具,值得临床推广应用.     

军人创伤后应激障碍患者的关联性负变异常变化及临床随访

目的　了解军人创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD)患者关联性负变 (CNV)的特征和治疗缓解后CNV的变化。方法　应用美国NicoletBravo型脑诱发电位仪及光、声两种成对刺激方法 ,对 6 6例发病期PTSD患者 (患者组 )和 5 6名健康军人 (对照组 )进行CNV测定以及症状自评量表 (SCL - 90 )和事件影响量表 (IES)评定 ,并对患者组中的 6 0例进行了临床随访。结果　患者组发病期M1潜伏期延迟 (P <0 0 1) ,M2 波幅增高 (P <0 0 1) ,命令信号后负变化(PINV)出现率增高 (P <0 0 1) ;SCL - 90及IES总分及其部分因子分升高 (P <0 0 1) ;CNV变异指标与SCL - 90及IES总分及其部分因子分显著相关 (P <0 0 1或 0 0 5 )。患者组康复期M1潜伏期、M2 波幅和PINV出现率 ,以及SCL- 90与IES总分及其部分因子分均恢复至正常值内 (与发病期比较P <0 0 1,与对照组比较P >0 0 5 ) ,且治疗前后CNV变异指标差值与精神症状减分率显著相关 (P <0 0 1或 0 0 5 )。结论　PTSD患者的CNV变化可能是状态标志。     

军人创伤后应激障碍患者的关联性负变异常变化及临床随访

目的了解军人创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者关联性负变(CNV)的特征和治疗缓解后CNV的变化.方法应用美国Nicolet Bravo型脑诱发电位仪及光、声两种成对刺激方法,对66例发病期PTSD患者(患者组)和56名健康军人(对照组)进行CNV测定以及症状自评量表(SCL-90)和事件影响量表(IES)评定,并对患者组中的60例进行了临床随访.结果患者组发病期M1潜伏期延迟(P＜0.01),M2波幅增高(P＜0.01),命令信号后负变化(PINV)出现率增高(P＜0.01);SCL-90及IES总分及其部分因子分升高(P＜0.01);CNV变异指标与SCL-90及IES总分及其部分因子分显著相关(P＜0.01或0.05).患者组康复期M1潜伏期、M2波幅和PINV出现率,以及SCL-90与IES总分及其部分因子分均恢复至正常值内(与发病期比较P＜0.01,与对照组比较P＞0.05),且治疗前后CNV变异指标差值与精神症状减分率显著相关(P＜0.01或0.05).结论 PTSD患者的CNV变化可能是状态标志.     

强迫症、抑郁症及焦虑症患者事件相关电位的比较研究

目的　探讨强迫症 (OCD)、抑郁症 (CD)及焦虑症 (CA)患者三种事件相关电位 (ERP)的变异。方法　应用美国NicoletSpirit脑诱发电位仪 ,采用光和声成对刺激、反应时间以及听觉靶 非靶刺激序列技术 ,检测 31例OCD、2 0例CD和 17例CA及 2 8名正常人 (NC)的关联性负变 (CNV)、P3 0 0 及失匹性负波 (MMN)。结果　 (1)CNV :M1波幅CD组 [(5± 4 ) μV]和CA组 [(7± 4 ) μV]低于NC组 [(14±6 ) μV]和OCD组 [(16± 6 ) μV ;P <0 0 5和P <0 0 1]。指令信号后负变化的出现率CD组 (6 0 % )、OCD组 (45 % )和CA组 (35 % )均高于NC组 (4% ;P <0 0 1)。 (2 )P3 0 0 :在靶刺激中 ,N2 潜伏期在四组间的差异有非常显著性 (P <0 0 1) ,其中OCD组 [(2 78 9± 2 2 7)ms]和CD组 [(2 77 3± 2 1 8)ms]的潜伏期均长于NC组 [(2 5 9 0± 14 0 )ms],CA组短于CD组和OCD组 (P <0 0 1) ;P3 波幅在四组间的差异亦有非常显著性 (P <0 0 1) ,其中OCD组 [(3 4± 1 5 ) μV]、CD组 [(2 9± 1 3) μV]和CA组 [(3 3± 1 3) μV]均低于NC组 [(5 9± 2 1) μV]。在非靶刺激中 ,CA组P2 波幅低于OCD组和NC组 (P <0 0 5 )。 (3)MMN :OCD组、CD组及NC组之间潜伏期和波幅的差异有显著性和非常显著性 (P <0 0 5和P <0 0 1)。其中OCD     

军人创伤后应激障碍患者认知性电位变化及其与精神症状的关系

目的　探讨军人创伤后应激障碍(PSTD)患者认知性电位(CEP)的特征和治疗缓解后变化及其与精神症状的关系。方法　应用美国Nicolet Bravo型脑诱发电位仪,对 66 例发病期及其 60 例康复期 PTSD患者进行关联性负变(CNV)、视觉诱发电位(VEP)和听觉诱发电位(AEP)测定,并进行症状自评量表(SCL -90)和事件影响量表(IES)评定。结果　患者组发病期与对照组比较,CNV/M1、VEP/P2 和 AEP/N2 潜伏期延迟(P<0.01或0.05),CNV/M2 和AEP/P3 波幅增高(P<0.01),命令信号后负变化(PINV)出现率增高(P<0.01),SCL-90和IES总分及其部分因子分升高(P<0.01),且 CEP指标与 SCL 90 及 IES总分及其部分因子分显著相关(P<0.01 或 0.05)。患者组康复期 CNV/M1、VEP/P2 和 AEP/N2 潜伏期,CNV/M2、AEP/P3 波幅,PINV出现率以及SCL- 90和IES总分及其部分因子分均恢复至正常值内(与发病期比较P<0.01或0.05,与对照组比较 P>0.05)且治疗前后 CEP指标差值与 SCL 90 及 IES总分及其部分因子减分率显著相关(P<0.01或0.05)。结论　CNV、VEP与AEP的变化可能是PTSD的状态标志。     

人脸照片诱发伴随性负变化实验研究——附32例抑郁症分析

目的 应用脸部照片(熟人和陌生人)及短声刺激研究伴随性负变化(CNV).方法 检测32例抑郁症患者和30名正常人的CNV.结果 抑郁症组波形不规则,CNV-Ⅱ型尤甚,CNV潜伏期A点和后负变化(PINV)延迟,波幅B降低.结论 新的刺激模式将应用于CNV实验中,抑郁症CNV变化诸特点值得进一步随访.     

Posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder in adolescent bipolar disorder

Objective: Anxiety disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUD) are increasingly recognized as comorbid disorders in children with bipolar disorder (BPD). This study explores the relationship between BPD, PTSD, and SUD in a cohort of BPD and non‐BPD adolescents. Methods: We studied 105 adolescents with BPD and 98 non‐mood‐disordered adolescent controls. Psychiatric assessments were made using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia–Epidemiologic Version (KSADS‐E), or Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV (SCID) if 18 years or older. SUD was assessed by KSADS Substance Use module for subjects under 18 years, or SCID module for SUD if age 18 or older. Results: Nine (8%) BPD subjects endorsed PTSD and nine (8%) BPD subjects endorsed subthreshold PTSD compared to one (1%) control subject endorsing full PTSD and two (2%) controls endorsing subthreshold PTSD. Within BPD subjects endorsing PTSD, seven (39%) met criteria for SUD. Significantly more SUD was reported with full PTSD than with subthreshold PTSD (χ² = 5.58, p = 0.02) or no PTSD (χ² = 6.45, p = 0.01). Within SUD, the order of onset was BPD, PTSD, and SUD in three cases, while in two cases the order was PTSD, BPD, SUD. The remaining two cases experienced coincident onset of BPD and SUD, which then led to trauma, after which they developed PTSD and worsening SUD. Conclusion: An increased rate of PTSD was found in adolescents with BPD. Subjects with both PTSD and BPD developed significantly more subsequent SUD, with BPD, PTSD, then SUD being the most common order of onset. Follow‐up studies need to be conducted to elucidate the course and causal relationship of BPD, PTSD and SUD.     

抑郁症还是双相障碍？

1 病史简介 患者,男,34岁,工人,已婚。因反复烦躁不安、情绪低落发作19年,于2011年5月26日第1次住我院。患者于1992年读初中二年级时与同学打架后,对老师的处理方式不满,渐出现不愿意读书,眠差,情绪不稳定,烦躁,之后出现情绪低落,注意力不易集中,记忆力下降,兴趣减退,自1992年起休学。     

双相障碍与强迫症的共病

概述

在双相障碍患者中强迫症状是常见的。因为双相障碍和强迫症的共病状态会令这两种障碍的临床治疗复杂化，所以确定这些共病的患者是很重要的。我们讨论了强迫症和双相障碍的共病，介绍了可能导致这种常见共病状态的发病机制，也讨论了该领域最新的研究进展，并提出一些管理这些患者的临床原则。

中文全文

本文全文中文版从2015年10月26日起在http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215009可供免费阅览下载 Previous studies have documented high rates of comorbidity of other psychiatric conditions among individuals with bipolar disorders (BD).[1] One study estimated that obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) accounted for 21% of all comorbidities in BD.[2] There is continuing debate about whether (a) these are two independent conditions that can co-occur or (b) OCD is a specific subtype of BD. Regardless of the interrelationship of the two conditions, the comorbid occurrence of these two types of symptoms can cause a clinical dilemma because selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)-which are quite commonly used to treat OCD-increases the risk of precipitating manic symptoms.[3,4,5,6] The OCD symptoms that occur in individuals with BD often occur during the depressive episodes or during the intervals between episodes of depressive or manic symptoms.[7,8] This timing of OCD symptoms during BD is consistent with the cyclic nature of BD and suggests shared biological mechanisms between the two disorders. In support of this hypothesis, a study using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) found that in untreated persons with BD the serotonin-transporter binding potential in the insular and dorsal cingulate cortex was higher among BD patients with pathological obsessions and compulsions than among BD patients without such symptoms.[9] Moreover, a linkage study found that compared to OCD patients without comorbid BD, patients with comorbid OCD and BD were more likely to have a family history of mood disorders but less likely to have a family history of OCD.[10] However, another study found no significant difference in the rates of a positive family history of OCD between patients with OCD alone and those with comorbid OCD and BD.[11] Further support for the hypothesized common etiology comes from a preliminary molecular genetic study which found that hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (HCN4) is a common susceptible locus for both mood disorders and OCD, but further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to replicate this finding.[12] The presence of OCD in BD complicates the clinical presentation. Compared to patients with BD without comorbid OCD, those that have comorbid BD and OCD often have a more severe form of BD, have more prolonged episodes, are less adherent to medication, and are less responsive to medication. Recent studies about comorbid BD and OCD have reported the following: (a) Temporal relationship. Some studies suggest that OCD is an antecedent of BD,[10] but others report concurrent onset of OCD and BD.[13,14] (b) Course of disease. In 44% of patients with comorbid BD and OCD the episodes are cyclic.[15] The course of disease is more chronic among BD patients with OCD compared to those without comorbid OCD.[16,17] OCD is more commonly observed in patients with Type II BD, among whom the prevalence of OCD has been reported to be as high as 75%.[18] (c) Compulsive behaviors. The most commonly reported compulsions among patients with comorbid OCD and BD are compulsive sorting,[14,19,20,21] controlling or checking, [20] repeating behaviors,[13,22] excessive washing,[20] and counting.[19] Obsessive reassurance-seeking is also commonly reported in these patients.[23] In children and adolescents with BD, compulsive hoarding, impulsiveness,[24] and sorting[25] are more common. (d) Substance and alcohol abuse. A study found a higher prevalence of sedative, nicotine, alcohol, and caffeine use among individuals with comorbid OCD and BD compared to those with BD without OCD.[14] Similarly, compared to OCD patients without comorbid mood disorders, those with a comorbid mood disorder were more likely to have a substance abuse diagnosis (OR=3.18, 95%CI=1.81-5.58) or alcohol abuse diagnosis (OR=2.21, 95%CI=1.34-3.65).[11,13,26,27,28] (e) Suicidal behaviors. Compared to BD patients without OCD, a greater proportion of patients with both disorders had a lifetime history of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.[2,11,13,29,30] The clinical management of comorbid OCD and BD requires first focusing on stabilizing the patient’s mood, which requires the combined use of multiple medications such as the use of lithium with anticonvulsants or atypical antipsychotic medications such as quetiapine;[31,32,33] adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole may be effective for the comorbid OCD symptoms.[4] In the case of OCD comorbid with type II BD, after full treatment of the mood symptoms with mood stabilizers the clinician can, while monitoring for potential drug interactions, cautiously try adjunctive treatment with antidepressants that are effective for both depressive symptoms and OCD symptoms and that have a low risk of inducing a full manic episode, including the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs): fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline.[32,35] In summary, BD comorbid with OCD may be etiologically distinct from either of the disorders. Clinicians should pay attention to its complex clinical manifestations and carefully consider the treatment principles outlined above.     

团体归因训练对抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症的疗效

目的：验证团体归因训练对抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者的临床治疗效果。方法：54例抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者按照入组到开始治疗的时间分为3个基线组,每组进行为期8周的归因训练团体治疗,采用多基线实验设计,每隔2周评定汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HA-MA）,治疗前后评定抑郁自评量表（SDS）、焦虑自评量表（SAS）和社会功能缺陷筛选量表（SDSS）,强迫症组加测Yale-Brown强迫症量表（Y-BOCS）。结果：所有被试者治疗前后HAMD、HAMA、SDS、SAS量表得分差异均有统计学意义（t=18.41,19.85,6.33,6.97,P〈0.01）;强迫症组治疗前后Y-BOCS得分差异有统计学意义（t=5.47,P〈0.001）;所有被试治疗前后社会功能改善显著（Z=-6.41,P〈0.001）。结论：团体归因训练对抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症患者治疗有效。     

强迫障碍共病强迫型人格障碍的研究

目的:研究强迫型人格障碍(OCPD)在强迫障碍(OCD)中的共病情况,并研究OCD共病OCPD对OCD影响。方法:以69例门诊OCD患者为研究对象,采用DSM-Ⅳ轴Ⅱ障碍用临床定式检查(SCID-Ⅱ)研究强迫障碍患者的共病人格障碍(PD)情况,将研究对象分为2组:OCD共病OCPD组和OCD不共病OCPD组,对比研究2组间临床特征的不同。结果:79.7%强迫障碍患者合并有PD,C类中的OCPD和OCD共病率达43.5%。共病组较不共病组疾病严重程度更重,表现为发病年龄早、病程更长、强迫思维更严重。结论:OCPD和OCD关系密切,OCD共病OCPD是OCD严重程度的一个标志。     

Organic delusional disorder in psychiatric in-patients: comparison with delusional disorder

Organic delusional disorder (ODD) is rarely diagnosed in psychiatric in-patients, and may be misdiagnosed as delusional disorder (DD) from a similar clinical presentation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of ODD and to make a comparison with those of DD patients. Patients who conformed to DSM-III-R criteria for ODD were recruited from an 8-year psychiatric in-patient database. Matching controls were DD patients admitted over the same time period. The prevalence of ODD according to DSM-III-R criteria was 0.4% of total admissions and 2.9% of organic mental disorders. Compared to DD patients, ODD patients less often had a family psychiatric history, and had an older age of onset of psychiatric disorder, longer hospital stays and lower treatment dosage of antipsychotic drugs. It is suggested that a detailed medical history and examination are needed in patients with delusion, especially in patients with a late onset of psychiatric symptoms and no family psychiatric history.     

双相障碍共病强迫症的研究进展

双相障碍(BD)共病强迫症(OCD)在临床中越来越常见.尽管国内外有许多关于BD共病OCD的文献报道,但是关于神经生物学和治疗方面的研究较少[1],对于临床医生来说,治疗BD共病OCD的患者是一个挑战,因为稳定情绪和抗强迫的治疗应该共同进行.然而BD共病OCD的患者对于药物治疗的反应较差,作为OCD一线治疗药物的5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)在治疗中可以诱导BD中的躁狂/混合情绪状态发作,药物联合治疗和心理治疗的效果也不理想,所以在目前还没有比较理想的治疗方法 [2-3].     

双相障碍共病强迫症的临床特征与治疗

本文目的是对双相障碍共病强迫症的临床特征与治疗进行综述,以期为临床早期识别和干预提供参考.双相障碍共病强迫症的临床现象并不少见,但两者的治疗原则存在差异甚至互斥,导致治疗困境.本文就双相障碍共病强迫症的流行病学特征、临床特征及治疗进行探讨.     

Obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without bipolar disorder

Aim: Bipolar disorder (BD) is often comorbid with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). In this study, we compared clinical profile and course of subjects with a primary diagnosis of OCD with and without BD. Methods: We compared 34 subjects with primary diagnosis of OCD with BD and 57 subjects with a diagnosis of OCD without BD. Structured interview schedules, clinical rating scales, and information from clinical charts were utilized to assess patients. Results: OCD with BD was characterized by: (i) an episodic course; (ii) a higher number of depressive episodes, greater suicidality and a higher rate of hospitalization; (iii) fewer pathological doubts and more miscellaneous compulsions; and (iv) poorer insight into obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Conclusions: Episodic course appears to be typical of OCD with BD. Bipolarity has a pathoplastic effect on OCD and it is possible that some forms of OCD and BD are pathophysiologically related. Bipolar OCD is associated with a higher rate of depressive episodes, higher suicidality and more frequent hospitalizations, suggesting greater morbidity. Long‐term prospective follow‐up studies and studies addressing pathophysiology and genetic basis are needed to understand the complexity of such comorbidity.