Emerging data on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy: Breast International Group trial 1-98/MA.17

In recent years, several major trials have studied aromatase inhibitors (AIs)/inactivators as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. The AIs have demonstrated improved efficacy compared with 5 years of tamoxifen when used as initial therapy or when used sequentially after 2-3 years. They also improve outcomes when used after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen in this patient population. In all cases, AIs improve disease-free survival compared with the standard 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, leading to a reassessment of the optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology now recommends the inclusion of an AI into the adjuvant regimen at some point for most postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, the optimal duration of AI therapy and the comparative efficacy and safety of the alternative strategies for their incorporation remain matters of debate. In addition, the long-term impact of AIs on other organs, such as the bone and cardiovascular systems, is not completely understood, and longer follow-up of patients from these original trials as well as carefully planned future trials with appropriate substudies are essential to determine the optimal endocrine treatment strategy.     

Appraising adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy

Tamoxifen, once the gold standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, is being challenged by third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) that have demonstrated improved disease-free survival in a variety of adjuvant settings for early breast cancer. Tamoxifen and AIs have different safety profiles, which should allow physicians to begin to individualize treatment based on a patient's comorbidities and risk factors. Because of its properties as a partial estrogen agonist, tamoxifen has a positive effect on serum lipids and may confer a cardioprotective benefit, as well as a beneficial effect on bone health. However, tamoxifen increases the risk for endometrial cancer and cerebrovascular/thromboembolic events. In comparison, the major side effect of AIs is increased bone loss, which may heighten the risk for osteoporotic fractures and bone pain. Because of their superior efficacy and manageable side effects, AIs are a cost-effective alternative to tamoxifen, and clinical guidelines now embrace AIs as appropriate adjuvant therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer. The anticipated results of ongoing trials will provide further insights into the long-term safety and application of AI therapy in the adjuvant setting.     

Safety considerations of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Because of its proven efficacy profile based on long-term data, tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-sensitive early breast cancer for the past 30 years. However, there is well-established evidence that long-term use of tamoxifen is associated with serious side effects. As adjuvant endocrine therapy is generally administered for long periods of time, the safety and tolerability of agents used in this setting are of particular importance. Due to their superior efficacy over tamoxifen, newer agents, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are already established therapies for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. In addition, recent trials indicate that the AI anastrozole ('Arimidex') has improved efficacy compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal women. The other third-generation AIs have reported disease-free survival benefits but not in the absence of prior treatment with tamoxifen; letrozole ('Femara') has been compared with placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen therapy and exemestane ('Aromasin') has been compared with tamoxifen following 2-3 years of prior treatment with tamoxifen. Long-term safety data show that anastrozole also has a more favorable overall safety profile compared with tamoxifen, particularly in terms of life-threatening events such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. Anastrozole alone, therefore, provides a new option for adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. The AIs have differing pharmacological profiles, which may translate into dissimilar adverse event profiles in the adjuvant treatment setting, but patient follow-up in most trials is relatively short to make a valid comparison. It cannot, therefore, be assumed that all AIs will be equally well tolerated in the adjuvant setting. Further data on the long-term safety of AIs other than anastrozole are therefore required to allow overall risk:benefit assessments on these agents to be made.     

Recent perspectives of endocrine therapy for breast cancer

The choice of endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on the menopausal status and stage of disease. Endocrine therapy remains the first choice and most important component in the treatment of hormone sensitive non-life threatening advanced breast cancer. In premenopausal women with metastatic disease, the combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist plus tamoxifen is reasonable as first-line endocrine therapy. In postmenopausal patients with recurrent disease progressing after or during adjuvant tamoxifen, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred first-line endocrine treatment. Many premenopausal and postmenopausal women with hormone responsive breast cancer benefit from sequential use of endocrine therapies at the time of disease progression. Recent clinical trials designs have been implemented, employing AIs as monotherapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, as first-line adjuvant therapy, and in sequence either 2-3 or 5 years, with initial tamoxifen. Emerging results from these trials indicate an advantage to patients for any of these strategies, and most international guidelines now suggest the use of an AI in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal women. The use of endocrine treatment for metastatic and early breast cancer will be reviewed here.     

A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Randomized clinical trials have established the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) as standard treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who have experienced disease progression with antiestrogen therapy. Significant gains in clinical efficacy and improved tolerability over progestins (megestrol acetate) and the first-generation AI aminoglutethimide have positioned these agents above previous therapies. Estrogen receptor (ER) status remains the best predictive determinant of endocrine response, and further randomized trials with properly selected patient populations may distinguish individual AIs within this class. A recently completed, randomized, head-to-head phase III trial of letrozole versus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy demonstrated a significant difference in objective response rate for letrozole compared with anastrozole (19% versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.014), with similar time to progression. The improved efficacy and safety of AIs as second-line endocrine therapies has spawned trials of their use as first-line endocrine therapy versus tamoxifen for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Based on favorable results from these trials, letrozole and anastrozole have also been approved for use as first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

The breast cancer continuum in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: evolving management options focusing on aromatase inhibitors.

There are now a number of highly effective options for the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Although tamoxifen was the standard hormonal treatment for many years, we now have another option for postmenopausal women: the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole. A number of trials have investigated the use of third-generation AIs compared with tamoxifen throughout the continuum of treatment settings for postmenopausal women with breast cancer. In the neoadjuvant setting, letrozole, given for 4 months, resulted in better overall clinical response and breast-conserving surgery rates than tamoxifen. The Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole Tamoxifen or Combined with Tamoxifen trial gave anastrozole for 3 months with no difference in clinical response but significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates. Compared with tamoxifen, anastrozole and letrozole significantly improved disease-free survival as early adjuvant treatment for hormone-receptor-positive disease. Switching to anastrozole or exemestane after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen for a total of 5 years of therapy was also more effective than continued tamoxifen. All three agents are approved in the early adjuvant or switching setting in the USA. Letrozole following 5 years of tamoxifen as extended adjuvant treatment improved disease-free survival and, in the node-positive subgroup, overall survival when compared with placebo. Anastrozole and letrozole are both approved for the first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women; letrozole showed an improved response rate compared with tamoxifen. Anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane are all indicated for the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. In summary, third-generation AIs have been shown to have superior efficacy over tamoxifen in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings and to improve outcome as extended adjuvant therapy following 5 years of tamoxifen. Ongoing studies will further define the role of sequential adjuvant treatment. Appropriate duration of treatment is another important area of investigation. This review will cover hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with breast cancer and will not address the treatment of premenopausal women.     

Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors following tamoxifen for early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women: what do we really know?

Adjuvant hormonal therapy in the treatment of women with early-stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer is now considered the standard of care. Adjuvant tamoxifen decreases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and death in women with early-stage breast cancer when taken for 5 years. The benefits of tamoxifen are counterbalanced by toxicities including an increased risk of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events. The selective aromatase inhibitors (AIs)--including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane--are challenging the role of tamoxifen as the adjuvant hormonal therapy of choice in postmenopausal women. Results of the Arimidex and Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial favor the use of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant hormonal therapy, with improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and a favorable toxicity profile. The results of 2 large adjuvant trials using AIs sequentially with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early-stage, HR-positive breast cancer have been reported. The MA-17 study randomized women to placebo or letrozole for 5 years after completion of 4.5-6 years of initial tamoxifen. The Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES) randomized women following 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen to continue to receive tamoxifen or switch to exemestane for a total of 5 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy. The MA-17 and IES trials demonstrated superior DFS with the AI and corroborated the smaller GROCTA-4B and Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex trials, which studied sequential therapy with aminoglutethamide or anastrozole. There is now substantial medical evidence supporting the use of AIs in postmenopausal women with early-stage, HR-positive breast cancer.     

Current topics and perspectives on the use of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer

Tamoxifen has played a central role in endocrine therapy for hormone-responsive breast cancer. Results of recent clinical trials have, however, clearly shown that third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, are superior to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, in an adjuvant setting and for early breast cancer. Many studies have been published that describe new results from clinical trials and how they fundamentally prove the efficacy of AIs. There are, however, still some unresolved issues concerning the applications of AIs, such as the optimal duration of the therapy, the optimal regimens (initial, adjuvant or switching from tamoxifen to AI), and combination with LH–RH agonists for premenopausal woman. These issues are discussed in this review. Additionally, further possibilities for the application of AIs, for example in combination therapy with pure antiestrogen aimed at complete estrogen blockade and in combination with new biological agents, as well as the pharmacogenomics of AIs will be discussed.     

Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: proven efficacy across the spectrum of disease

For more than 100 years, hormonal therapy has been known to be effective in the treatment of breast cancer. Initially, this therapy was dominated by the selective estrogen receptor antagonists such as tamoxifen. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a distinct drug class with demonstrated activity in the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer. All 3 third-generation AIs, exemestane, anastrozole, and letrozole, have been studied in multiple lines of therapy in advanced breast cancer and have demonstrated equivalence or superiority compared with tamoxifen. While initially developed as a treatment option for advanced disease, the AIs have also shown efficacy in the treatment of curable disease, including the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In addition, the AIs demonstrate a tolerable side effect profile in comparison with tamoxifen, and this has led to their early incorporation as standard of care therapy. Given the proven efficacy of AIs across the spectrum of breast cancer, the remaining questions include definitive sequencing strategy, timing, and duration of use. Ongoing trials include head-to-head comparisons between the AIs in early-stage breast cancer; the results of these trials are eagerly anticipated and should further optimize the use of AIs.     

Safety of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane are replacing tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in most postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Although AIs have demonstrated superior efficacy and better overall safety compared with tamoxifen in randomized controlled trials, they may not provide the cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen, and bone loss may be a concern with their long-term adjuvant use. Patients require regular bone mineral density monitoring, and prophylactic bisphosphonates are being evaluated to determine whether they may protect long-term bone health. AIs decrease the risks of thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events compared with tamoxifen, and the overall rate of cardiovascular events in patients treated with AIs is within the range seen in age-matched, non-breast-cancer populations. AIs are also associated with a lower incidence of endometrial cancer and fewer vaginal bleeding/discharge events than tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, the incidence of hot flashes is lower with anastrozole and letrozole but may be higher with exemestane. Generally, adverse events with AIs are predictable and manageable, whereas tamoxifen may be associated with life-threatening events in a minority of patients. Overall, the benefits of AIs over tamoxifen are achieved without compromising overall quality of life.     

Aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have greatly enriched the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. Before the introduction of the well-tolerated third-generation AIs, tamoxifen was the mainstay of endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Many clinical trials have shown the superiority of AIs compared with tamoxifen in adjuvant breast cancer treatment, as well as their benefit in metastatic breast cancer. NCCN guidelines recommendations for their use are based on the evidence provided by these clinical trials. This discussion reviews the evidence supporting the current guidelines for use of AI therapy in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients.     

The role of aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer

Opinion statement The role of hormonal therapy for the treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer has been evaluated in many studies. The results of these studies establish tamoxifen as the gold standard of hormonal therapy for the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptorpositive invasive breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women. Studies show tamoxifen reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer in women at increased risk for the disease, including women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Tamoxifen has adverse effects such as hot flashes, increased risk of uterine cancer in postmenopausal women, and rare occurrence of thromboembolic disease. Despite the multiple therapeutic roles of tamoxifen, alternatives are needed. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are drugs with antiestrogenic activity. AIs function by inhibiting the peripheral conversion of adrenally synthesized androstenedione to estradiol through inhibition of the aromatase enzyme. AIs do not suppress estradiol synthesis by the ovary adequately. Therefore, AIs are effective in reducing circulating estradiol levels in postmenopausal women, but not premenopausal women. Selective nonsteroidal AIs, including anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) and letrozole (Femara; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ), and the steroidal AI exemestane (Aromasin; Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ) have been associated with increased specificity and improved therapeutic index compared to nonselective AIs such as aminoglutethamide. Nonsteroidal and steroidal AIs have demonstrated to be superior to megestrol acetate in second-line therapy of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, and selective nonsteroidal AIs have shown to be superior to tamoxifen in first-line therapy of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. The ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen, alone, or in combination) trial is the only published randomized trial comparing the efficacy of an AI to tamoxifen for the adjuvant treatment of women with early breast cancer. This large study showed that at a median follow-up time of 33 months, anastrozole alone results in significant improvement in disease-free survival rates, reduction in contralateral breast cancers, and increased tolerability, compared to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women. Although the long-term effects of AIs are not known, the early positive results of the ATAC trial led to the approval of anastrozole by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as adjuvant hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. Thus, there is an alternative to tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with relative/absolute contraindications to tamoxifen use or patients who choose not to take tamoxifen because of its side-effect profile. New AIs may challenge the position of tamoxifen as the gold standard for the treatment of early stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women.     

Recent advances in endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: implications for treatment and prevention.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of advanced breast cancer, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have shown superior efficacy and tolerability compared with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate, the previous standard endocrine therapies in the first- and second-line settings, respectively. AIs are now being assessed in the adjuvant and prevention settings. DESIGN: Literature review (PubMed search). RESULTS: Tamoxifen is currently the only endocrine option available for adjuvant therapy and chemoprevention in postmenopausal women. However, results from the ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial have shown anastrozole to be more effective than tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer. Other third-generation AIs, including letrozole and exemestane, are also being investigated as adjuvant therapies. In the chemoprevention setting, tamoxifen is the only available endocrine option for women at high risk of breast cancer but, given that these are healthy subjects, is associated with an unacceptable rate of adverse events. Raloxifene is being further assessed in the STAR (Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene) trial, while anastrozole is being evaluated in the second IBIS-II (International Breast Intervention Study II). CONCLUSIONS: AIs, in particular anastrozole, are set to change the way that early breast cancer is treated. Effective and better-tolerated endocrine alternatives for breast cancer prevention may become available in the future.     

Reducing the risk of distant metastases: a better end point in adjuvant aromatase inhibitor breast cancer trials?

For women with hormone receptor-positive disease, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, are more effective than tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival (DFS) when used initially or as adjuvant therapy following two to three years of tamoxifen or after tamoxifen has been completed. Demonstrating improvement in overall survival (OS), or breast cancer-associated mortality, however, requires long follow-up in large numbers of patients. Subsequent crossover to another treatment following disease recurrence further confounds the assessment of OS benefit. DFS is the primary end point of most adjuvant trials, but the definition varies among trials, making cross-trial comparisons difficult. Importantly, DFS benefit does not always correlate with OS benefit. Distant metastasis is a well-recognized predictor of breast cancer-associated mortality, and AIs have shown greater efficacy over tamoxifen in reducing distant metastatic events and improving distant DFS (DDFS). A small proportion of initially treated early breast cancer patients may already have micrometastatic tumor deposits that can result in the rapid development of distant metastases. Thus, early identification and aggressive treatment of such patients with the most effective adjuvant therapies is a major goal. This review discusses the efficacy of the AIs in improving DDFS in the different adjuvant settings and explores whether significant improvements in DDFS correlate with meaningful improvements in OS or breast cancer-associated mortality. Significant DDFS improvement may be a quicker, better end point in clinical trials, leading to a more efficient, faster assessment of treatment efficacy.     

The aromatase inhibitors (plus ovarian function suppression) in premenopausal breast cancer patients: Ready for prime time?

Tamoxifen alone or the combination of ovarian function suppression (OFS) and tamoxifen are the mainstay of hormonal therapy in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. The results of large trials conducted with the third generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, indicated better outcomes among postmenopausal breast cancer patients with endocrine responsive disease given AIs than among those given tamoxifen. These results supported the investigation of AIs in combination with OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. In this article we reviewed the efficacy and toxicity data on the use of AIs combined with OFS in premenopausal breast cancer patients in metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and about 80% of breast cancers express hormone receptors. Tamoxifen has been the most important form of adjuvant endocrine therapy over the last 25 years. The third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a new class of drugs challenging the central role of tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Their effectiveness has been demonstrated in first line therapy as well in neoadjuvant setting with a statistically significant superiority over tamoxifen. Here we considered the role of adjuvant AIs in early stage breast cancer with an analysis reviewing the main adjuvant trials. We considered efficacy, side effects, optimal timing, duration of the therapy and whether specific subgroups may achieve particular benefit. In conclusion the upfront use of adjuvant anastrozole or letrozole is superior to tamoxifen with a good relative toxicity profile. Tamoxifen will continue to have a role where recurrence risk is low or if AI is poorly tolerated. Issues including the timing of administration (up-front or sequential), the duration of the therapy and the role of biomarkers such as PgR and HER2 in optimal selection remain unresolved.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is a critical part of adjuvant therapy in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer. For decades, 5 years of tamoxifen has been the standard treatment. For premenopausal women, it remains so, and we await the results of ongoing trials to define the role of ovarian suppression or ablation with endocrine therapy. If a woman becomes postmenopausal during treatment, consideration should be given to extended adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for another 5 years. In postmenopausal women, trials have shown that AIs are more beneficial than tamoxifen in preventing disease recurrence.They have been compared as upfront treatment for 5 years, as sequential therapy after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, and as extended treatment for 5 years after 5 years of tamoxifen. Among the questions still being studied are the optimal duration of extended adjuvant therapy with AIs, how one AI performs compared to another, and whether there is a benefit to intermittent extended adjuvant treatment.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: evolution of NCCN, ASCO, and St Gallen recommendations

Endocrine therapy has a firm role in adjuvant treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer. Until recently, tamoxifen was the most commonly used adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Several randomized clinical trials have studied the third-generation selective aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) as adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women. These studies compared therapy with an AI alone versus tamoxifen alone; 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen followed by switching to an AI versus continuation of tamoxifen; or extended therapy with an AI after approximately 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. No statistically significant differences in overall survival were observed. A single trial using extended treatment with an adjuvant AI suggests a small, statistically significant survival advantage in women with axillary lymph node-positive disease while showing no statistically significant decrease in survival with the use of an AI. The toxicities of the AIs are generally acceptable, with fewer endometrial cancers, gynecologic complaints, and thromboembolic events, but more bone fractures and arthralgias compared with tamoxifen alone. Three widely disseminated treatment guidelines, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, the American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors, and the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer, now incorporate AIs in the adjuvant therapy of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.     

Applicability of the intratumor aromatase preclinical model to predict clinical trial results with endocrine therapy

Preclinical models and clinical studies have shown that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are powerful inhibitors of estrogen synthesis and significantly suppress estrogen in vivo. For more than 20 years, standard first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer has been the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with differential effects on breast, endometrial, bone, and vascular tissues. The estrogenic activity of tamoxifen is associated with deleterious clinical side effects, including vaginal bleeding, endometrial cancer, and thromboembolism. AIs are established second-line treatments in patients who progress with tamoxifen. Compared with progestins, such as megestrol acetate, or the earlier AIs aminoglutethimide and fadrozole, the new AIs, including exemestane, anastrozole, and letrozole, have increased efficacy and clinical benefit and cause fewer side effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole and anastrozole are approved first-line therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer and as second-line treatment after tamoxifen failure. Studies in the intratumoral aromatase xenograft preclinical model have shown better responses with AIs than with antiestrogens in first-line therapy, and these data are consistent with the results from clinical trials. This model is now being used to assess whether combined or sequential administration of AIs with other agents may provide additional benefit.     

Clinical decision making in breast cancer: TAM and aromatase inhibitors for older patients - a jungle?

Aromatase inhibitors and inactivators (AIs) have been/are being widely investigated as an alternative to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients. In this paper we have reviewed data from phase III studies to define the role of AIs versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, as primary therapy for not operable or early breast cancers not suitable for conservative surgery and as adjuvant treatment for women with early breast cancer. An effort has been performed to evaluate whether specific recommendations were needed for older postmenopausal patients. AIs play a key role in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and represent the agent of choice in patients who are candidates to neoadjuvant hormone-therapy. Longer follow-up of already published trials and additional data coming from ongoing studies will better define when and how to use AIs in the adjuvant setting.