Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma

We have examined basal and luminal cell cytokeratin expression in 1944 cases of invasive breast carcinoma, using tissue microarray (TMA) technology, to determine the frequency of expression of each cytokeratin subtype, their relationships and prognostic relevance, if any. Expression was determined by immunocytochemistry staining using antibodies to the luminal cytokeratins (CKs) 7/8, 18 and 19 and the basal markers CK 5/6 and CK 14. Additionally, assessment of alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and oestrogen receptor status (ER) was performed. The vast majority of the cases showed positivity for CK 7/8, 18 and 19 indicating a differentiated glandular phenotype, a finding associated with good prognosis, ER positivity and older patient age. In contrast, basal marker expression was significantly related to poor prognosis, ER negativity and younger patient age. Multivariate analysis showed that CK 5/6 was an independent indicator for relapse free interval. We were able to subgroup the cases into four distinct phenotype categories (pure luminal, mixed luminal/basal, pure basal and null), which had significant differences in relation to the biological features and the clinical course of the disease. Tumours classified as expressing a basal phenotype (the combined luminal plus basal and the pure basal) were in a poor prognostic subgroup, typically ER negative in most cases. These findings provide further evidence that breast cancer has distinct differentiation subclasses that have both biological and clinical relevance.     

Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of breast—evaluation for Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA,human papillomavirus,and markers of basal cell differentiation

This is a largest series of 5 cases of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LEC) of the breast attempting to look at the expression of basal cytokeratins (CKs), human papillomavirus, and Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNAs in these tumors. Five cases were selected after stringent evaluation of all breast carcinomas showing dense lymphoid infiltration. Histologically, all these tumors showed the typical histology except 1 tumor that showed an unusual granulomatous response. All tumors were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 (triple negative). Three tumors expressed CK5/6 and high-molecular-weight CK, whereas only the case with nodal metastasis expressed CK14. Analysis for in situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNAs and human papillomavirus DNA on paraffin-processed tissues was negative in all tumors. All of these patients received adjuvant therapy. One patient with tumor expressing basal marker, CK5/6, had contralateral breast malignancy after a duration of 53 months of treatment completion. The rest were disease free with the follow-up period in the range of 6 to 105 months. The lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of breast expressed basal CK profile that is more CK5/6 positive than CK14. Analysis of basal markers within these tumors may help in refining the definition of these tumors and in classifying them into prognostically relevant groups.     

Cytokeratin profiles of male breast cancers

AIMS: The prognostic factors and expression of molecular markers in male breast carcinomas are similar to those in female breast cancers. The identification of distinct cytokeratin (CK) profiles (basal as opposed to luminal cells) helps to identify subsets of tumours with different clinical behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate CK expression in male breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two cases of male breast cancer were studied. The panel of CKs studied by immunohistochemistry included: 5/6, 14, 17, 18 and 19. Pathological findings and CK expression were analysed in all cases. Histological patterns included ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma and mixed patterns. Four cases were positive for CK5/6 and CK14, identifying a basal-like phenotype. CK17 was negative in all but two cases. All cases expressing either CK5/6 or CK14 were invasive carcinomas of high nuclear and histological grade and were also larger compared with the tumours not expressing CK5/6 and CK14. All tumours except three (also negative for CK5/6) expressed CK18 and CK19. The four basal-like tumours were negative for Her-2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Male breast carcinomas have a basal-like phenotype that is similar in frequency to that of female breast carcinomas. The expression of CK5/6 and CK14 identifies a subset of pathologically aggressive male breast cancers.     

Immunohistochemical characterization of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: a study from North India

In recent years breast cancer has been classified on the basis of its molecular characteristics by gene expression profiling. A similar classification using immunohistochemistry has been identified so that it has a wider application. This study was designed to define the precise prevalence of molecular subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma using immunohistochemistry in patients from north India and to correlate it with known clinical and histological prognostic factors. Based on ER/PR/Her2/neu expression, 100 cases of invasive breast cancer were categorized into: ER+ and ? or PR+ and Her2/neu? (47%), ER+ and?or PR+ and Her2/neu+ (15%), ER? and ? or PR? and Her2/neu+ (Her2/neu overexpressing, 21%), ER?, PR? and Her2/neu? (Triple negative, 17%). All cases demonstrated positivity for the luminal Cytokeratins 8/18. In addition, 10% of these tumours showed expression of the basal markers (CK4/14, CK5/6). Among the 17 triple negative cases, eight cases were positive for one of the basal markers and two cases with basal marker expression were Her2/neu overexpressing. The basal markers showed significant correlations only with histological grade and ER negative status. On the basis of hormone receptor, Her‐2/neu and cytokeratin expressions, distinct subclasses of breast cancer have been identified which show significant differences in relation to histological grade and ER status. Expression of basal markers is needed to define basal‐like breast cancer.     

Keratin expression in breast cancers

Cytokeratin (CK) immunohistochemistry can play an important role in breast carcinoma evaluation. We evaluated the expression of a panel of commonly used CKs in a large cohort of breast cancers and assessed its correlation with other biomarkers and breast cancer subtypes. Expression of CK7, CK8, CK18 and CK19 was observed in more than 90?% of all breast carcinomas in this study, confirming their efficacy in immunohistochemical identification of breast cancer. A combination of CK8 and CK7 gave the highest sensitivity for detection of a minute number of breast cancer cells. Expression of other CKs, including CK5/6, CK14 and CK20, correlated positively with high tumour grade. The expression of CK5/6 and CK14 in a significant number of high-grade tumours raised concern regarding the use of absence of their expression to identify breast carcinoma. For identification of the basal subtype, CK5/6 gave a higher detection rate than CK14. CK20 expression was found more frequently than reported in previous studies, might constitute an indicator of poor prognosis and may be associated with the molecular apocrine subtype. This study highlights the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of the unique CK expression patterns in breast cancer.     

The cytokeratin profile of medullary carcinoma of the breast

AIMS: The cytokeratin (CK) phenotype and vimentin expression of 31 medullary carcinomas was studied using commercially available antibodies on archived material. Comparing the phenotype of typical and atypical tumours and the phenotype of metastases, the biological significance of cytokeratin and vimentin expression in medullary carcinomas of the breast was determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Antibodies to CK4, CK5 and 6, CK7, CK14, CK8 and 18, CK19, CK20 and to vimentin were used. All the typical and atypical medullary carcinomas and the metastases (10 cases) stained negatively for CK4 and positively for CK8-18 (CAM5.2). Almost all the tumours were CK7 and CK19 positive and CK20 negative. Twelve per cent of the tumours contained CK14. Twenty-five per cent of the typical, 43% of the atypical and 20% of the metastatic medullary carcinomas showed CK5-6 positivity. No association between the cytokeratin-vimentin profile of the tumours and axillary node metastases, tumour size or oestrogen receptor status was found but instability of CK expression was demonstrated by comparing the primary tumours with their metastases. CONCLUSIONS: : Medullary carcinomas of the breast express all the glandular type CKs including CK19 and additionally a proportion of the tumours expresses some of the CKs typical for myoepithelial cells. There was no correlation with prognostic factors.     

p63 correlates with both BRCA1 and cytokeratin 5 in invasive breast carcinomas: further evidence for the pathogenesis of the basal phenotype of breast cancer

AIMS: To study the expression of p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5 and CK8/18 in invasive ductal carcinomas and their relationship with BRCA1 and other pathological and immunohistochemical features of clinical significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry with the antibodies p63, CK5, CK8/18, BRCA1, oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, c-erbB-2 and Ki67 was performed in 102 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of invasive ductal carcinomas. The CK5+ cases were submitted to a double-immunolabelling study with p63. There was a strong relationship between CK5 and p63 expression and both markers were associated with hormonal receptor-negative high-grade carcinomas with high proliferative rate. Furthermore, there was coexpression of CK5 and p63 in neoplastic cells, indicating that p63, like CK5, is a marker of the basal phenotype of breast cancer. There was a strong relationship between reduced expression of BRCA1 with both p63 and CK5 expression as well as an inverse correlation between p63 and CK8/18 expression, suggesting that loss of p63 expression is required for the transition between a basal to a luminal phenotype of breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Since p63 is thought to be a marker of stem cells and may act as an oncogene, our data support the idea that BRCA1 acts as stem cell regulator.     

Biological and prognostic significance of stratified epithelial cytokeratins in infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas

 The biological significance of the differential expression of cytokeratin (CK) polypeptides in breast carcinomas is unclear. We examined the CK profiles of 101 primary infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas using monoclonal antibodies directed against 11 different CKs and against vimentin. Two major CK phenotypes were distinguished: first, a phenotype expressing only the simple-epithelial CKs 7 (variably), 8, 18 and 19, and secondly, a bimodal phenotype co-expressing significant amounts of one or more of the stratified-epithelial CKs 4, 14 and 17. The vast majority of G1 and G2 carcinomas had the simple-epithelium phenotype, as did a subgroup of G3 carcinomas. Interestingly, the majority (62%) of G3 carcinomas exhibited the bimodal phenotype, with the expression of CKs 4, 14 and 17 being statistically correlated with poor histological differentiation and absence of steroid hormone receptors. The distribution of vimentin only partially overlapped with that of these stratified-epithelial CKs. Prognostic analyses suggested that the presence of CKs 4, 14 and/or 17 was associated with short overall and disease-free survival in subgroups comprising G3, oestrogen-receptor-negative and vimentin-negative tumours. In node-positive tumours the correlation between these CKs and a shorter disease-free interval attained statistical significance (log rank, 0.0096). Thus, abnormal CK profiles in ductal breast carcinomas appear to reflect disturbed regulation of differentiation-related gene expression programmes and may prove to be of clinical value. Received: 26 August 1997 / Accepted: 11 February 1998     

Changes in cytokeratin expression accompany squamous metaplasia of the human respiratory epithelium

Summary To determine the characteristics of metaplastic changes of the nasal respiratory epithelium, the distribution of individual cytokeratins (CKs) was studied immunohistochemically and by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The authors define four types of changes of the normal pseudostratified columnar epithelium: (1) transitional pseudostratified epithelium (first unusual CK.: no. 13); (2) stratified columnar epithelium (increased expression of CKs 4 and 13; CKs 7, 8, 18 and 19 reduced); (3) stratified squamous epithelium, non-keratinized (appearance of CK 16); and (4) stratified squamous epithelium, keratinized (expression of CKs 1 and 10, variable CK5 and 14 patterns in basal cells). These phenotypes were found simultaneously within single specimens, resulting in apparent overall variability in the immunohistochemical staining patterns. Spatially, changes in CK expression towards normal parts were not abrupt but rather gradual. Biochemical data confirmed the immunohistochemical findings and added CK 6 to the pattern of altered nasal mucosa. The findings of this study suggest a stem cell metaplasia in the nasal epithelium which is based on its inherent bimodal developmental programme. A gradual loss of normal respiratory epithelial differentiation, as seen by the loss of CKs 7, 8, and 18, was paralleled by the appearance of squamous epithelial type CKs, e.g. the expression of CKs 1, 10 and 13. Basal cell types CKs 5, 14, 17 and 19 were maintained during this process. Implications of these results for general concepts of CK expression in the metaplastic process are discussed.     

A subset of prostate basal cells lacks the expression of corresponding phenotypic markers

Immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK) 34ssE12 has been routinely used to elucidate prostate basal cells for differentiation between non-invasive and invasive lesions. Our previous studies, however, revealed that some morphologically distinct basal cells observed on H&E-stained sections completely lacked CK34ssE12 expression. Our current study attempted to assess whether these basal cells would also lack the expression of other phenotypic markers, and whether basal cell alterations would affect the proliferation status of the associated tumor cells. Consecutive sections from prostate tumors with large basal cell clusters that were morphologically distinct in H&E sections but were completely negative for CK 34ssE12 were morphologically and immunohistochemically assessed with a panel of basal cell phenotypic and other markers. In addition to CK 34ssE12, these basal cells also completely lacked the expression of other phenotypic markers, including CK5, CK14, p63, and maspin, in contrast to adjacent basal cells, which were strongly positive for these markers. Tumors surrounded by basal cell layers that lack the expression of basal cell phenotypic markers showed a significantly higher rate of cell proliferation and mast cell infiltration than their counterparts. These findings suggest that basal cells might be targets of a variety of pathological alterations, which could significantly impact biological presentations of associated tumor cells.     

Breast cancer in the elderly: a histological assessment

Aims:  To understand the correlation between the expression status of different biological markers in breast cancers in the elderly.
Methods and results:  Three hundred and ninety-seven cases were evaluated for expression of hormone receptors [oestrogen receptors (ER) α and β, progesterone receptor (PR)], basal markers [p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 and CK14] and others (HER2/neu, synaptophysin and chromogranin). The expression rates were 60, 29, 25, 6, 14, 8, 28, 17 and 5%, respectively, for these markers. The expression of ER α and β, PR, synaptophysin and chromogranin at any level correlated with low nuclear or tumour grades, whereas the expression of HER2/neu, CK5/6 and CK14 at any level correlated with high nuclear grade. By using hierarchical clustering, groups of HER2, luminal and basal types were identified. In addition, a neuroendocrine group was also identified, being characterized by expression of synaptophysin, chromogranin, ER and PR, but not HER2/neu, and other basal cytokeratins. This group was associated with lower nuclear grade, and hence better prognosis.
Conclusions:  Breast cancer in the elderly shows similar molecular groupings as other breast cancers, with an additional neuroendocrine group that is associated with a favourable biological marker profile.     

Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation

The aim of this study was to assess the morphological characteristics and immunohistochemical profile of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial phenotypes to obtain a better understanding of their biological behaviour and nature. One thousand nine hundred and forty-four invasive breast carcinomas were examined, using tissue microarray (TMA) technology and immunohistochemistry, to identify those tumours that showed basal and myoepithelial phenotypes, and their immunophenotype profile was characterized using a variety of markers. In addition, haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of these tumours were studied for several morphological parameters. The findings were correlated with patient and tumour characteristics and outcome data. Tumours were classified into two groups: (1) tumours with basal phenotype [expressing one or both basal markers (CK5/6 and/or CK14)] and (2) tumours with myoepithelial phenotype (expressing SMA and/or p63). Group 1 was further subdivided into two subgroups: (A) dominant basal pattern (more than 50% of cells positive) and (B) basal characteristics (10-50% of cells positive). Group 1 tumours constituted 18.6% (8.6% and 10% for groups 1A and 1B, respectively) and group 2 constituted 13.7% of the cases. In both groups, the most common histological types were ductal/no specific type, tubular mixed and medullary-like carcinomas; the majority of these tumours were grade 3. There were positive associations with adenoid cystic growth pattern, loss of tubule formation, marked cellular pleomorphism, poorer Nottingham prognostic index, and development of distant metastasis. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of steroid hormone receptors and FHIT proteins and positive expression of p53 and EGFR. The most common characteristics in group 1 were larger size, high-grade comedo-type necrosis, development of tumour recurrence, and absence of lymph node disease. Group 2 tumours were more common in younger patients and were associated with central acellular zones, basaloid change, and positive E-cadherin protein expression. Group 1 characteristics were associated with both reduced overall survival (OS) [log rank (LR) = 22.5, p < 0.001] and reduced disease-free interval (DFI) (LR = 30.1, p < 0.001), while group 2 characteristics showed an association with OS (LR = 5, p = 0.02) but not with DFI. Multivariate analysis showed that basal, but not myoepithelial, phenotype has an independent value in predicting outcome. Breast cancers with basal and myoepithelial phenotypes are distinct groups of tumours that share some common morphological features and an association with poor prognosis. The basal rather than the myoepithelial phenotype has the strongest relationship with patient outcome.     

Centrally necrotizing carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological analysis of 33 cases indicating its basal‐like phenotype and poor prognosis

Yu L, Yang W, Cai X, Shi D, Fan Y & Lu H
(2010) Histopathology 57 , 193–201 Centrally necrotizing carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathological analysis of 33 cases indicating its basal‐like phenotype and poor prognosis Aims: To investigate the clinicopathological features and immunophenotype of centrally necrotizing carcinoma (CNC) of the breast to ascertain its relationship to basal‐like phenotype and its prognosis. Methods and results: The clinical and pathological characteristics of 33 CNCs were reviewed. Immunohis‐tochemical study of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, cytokeratin (CK) 8/18, high‐molecular‐weight CK (34βE12), CK5/6, CK14, CK17, smooth muscle antigen, p63, vimentin and epidermal growth factor receptor was performed. The striking feature of CNC was a central, necrotic or acellular zone surrounded by a ring‐like area of viable tumour cells. The central zone showed three morphological types: predominance of coagulative necrosis (21 cases), predominance of fibrosis and scar tissue (nine cases) and infarction (three cases). Tumour cells displayed invasive ductal carcinoma of high grade. The expression rate of basal‐like markers was higher than that of myoepithelial markers (87.9% versus 46.2%). Basal‐like subtype was shown by 63.6% of cases. The expression rate of CK5/6 (90.5%) was highest among basal‐like markers. Follow‐up data of 19 patients were available. Median progression‐free survival was 15.5 months. In 12 patients (63.2%), local recurrence and/or distant metastasis developed (median time to recurrence and/or metastasis, 14.0 months). Conclusions: CNC has distinctive morphological features, which mostly exhibit a basal‐like immunophenotype and poor prognosis. CNC is a typical representative of basal‐like breast cancer.     

Obligate basal cell component in salivary oncocytoma facilitates distinction from acinic cell carcinoma

The differential diagnosis between benign salivary oncocytoma (ONC) and low-grade malignant acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) can be difficult due to a significant histomorphological overlap of the structural and cytological presentation of both tumor types. To the best of our knowledge a comprehensive study comparing (immuno-)histological markers in cases of difficult differential diagnosis between ONC and ACC has not yet been performed. We investigated a panel of different immunohistochemical (CK5/6, CK14, CK7, CK18, p63 and Ki67) and histochemical (PAS, α-amylase) markers in 12 cases of ONC and 19 cases of ACC. The statistically significant stronger expression of CK7 in ONC and stronger expression of PAS and α-amylase in ACC in routine practice each is hampered by a pronounced overlap between both tumor groups. The obligate presence of an additional small basal cell component in all cases of ONC, demonstrable with p63 and CK5/6, enables a straightforward distinction from ACC, being constantly devoid of a basal cell component. Unexpectedly, CK14 is not a suitable marker for a reliable proof of these basal cells. The detection of this basal cell component in ONC in routine Hematoxylin–eosin stain is difficult and in some cases not possible; therefore, immunohistochemistry with p63 or CK5/6 is recommended for selected cases.     

Expression of cytokeratin markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast

Previously, we showed that pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast can be divided into 3 subtypes (luminal, basal/stem, and null) based on the expression of 5 cytokeratin (CK) markers: CK5/6, CK14, CK17 (stem/basal), and CK8, CK18 (luminal). The distributions of CK subtypes were associated with nuclear grade and differential expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), progesterone receptor (PR), HER-2/neu, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In this study, we further explore the expression patterns of CK markers, ER-alpha, PR, HER-2/neu, and EGFR by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of 99 cases of pure DCIS and 96 cases of DCIS with co-existing invasive ductal carcinoma (DCIS/IDC). We show that between high-grade DCIS and DCIS/IDC, there are differential expression patterns for ER-alpha, PR, and EGFR in corresponding CK subtypes, suggesting that at least some pure DCIS is molecularly distinct from DCIS/IDC. In most cases there is a high degree of co-expression of these markers between DCIS and the co-existing IDC, suggesting that DCIS is frequently a precursor lesion for co-existing IDC. The rate of discordant expression of these markers is low and is more frequently associated with high-grade carcinoma, suggesting that other molecular pathways also may also be present. There are significant differences in the expression of these molecular markers between high-grade and non-high-grade carcinomas, supporting the view that high-grade and non-high-grade carcinomas of the breast are molecularly distinct entities.     

p63, cytokeratin 5, and P-cadherin: three molecular markers to distinguish basal phenotype in breast carcinomas

Human breast carcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors diverse in behavior, outcome, and response to therapy. However, the current system of pathological classification does not take into account biologic determinants of prognosis. The purpose of this study was to classify and characterize breast carcinomas based on variations in protein expression patterns derived from immunohistochemical analyses on tissue microarrays (TMAs). Therefore, 11 TMAs representing 168 invasive breast carcinomas were constructed. Breast tumors were classified into four different subtypes depending on estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 expression. Basal-type tumors expressed neither of these proteins and represented 7.6% of our series; basal-like HER2-overexpressing tumors did not express ER and represented 17.7%; luminal-type tumors expressed ER and represented 72.8% of this series (luminal A 56.3%, luminal B 16.5%). Moreover, we characterized each subtype based on P-cadherin (P-CD), p63, cytokeratin (CK)5, BCL2, and Ki67 expression. Basal-type tumors were mostly grade III, more frequently P-CD-, p63-, and CK5-positive, and had a high proliferation rate. Conversely, luminal-type tumors rarely expressed basal markers and had a low grade and proliferation rate. Basal-like HER2-overexpressing tumors showed a basal-type profile similar with a high grade and up-regulation of P-CD and CK5. With this study, we show that P-CD, p63, and CK5 are important molecular markers that can be used to distinguish a basal phenotype. In addition, we also demonstrate the usefulness of TMAs in breast carcinoma immunoprofiling.     

P-cadherin and cytokeratin 5: useful adjunct markers to distinguish basal-like ductal carcinomas in situ

Gene expression profiles of invasive breast carcinomas have identified a subgroup of tumours with worse prognosis, which have been called "basal-like". These are characterized by a specific pattern of expression, being estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 negative, and frequently expressing at least one basal marker such as basal cytokeratins or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Previously, our group characterized basal-like tumours in a series of invasive breast carcinomas using P-cadherin (P-CD), p63 and cytokeratin 5 (CK5). Based on that study, we hypothesized that those high-grade basal-like invasive carcinomas might have a pre-invasive counterpart, which could be identified using the same approach. A series of 79 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) were classified into distinct subgroups according to their ER, HER2 and basal markers expression. Luminal DCIS expressed ER and constituted 64.6% of the series; the HER2 overexpressing tumours did not express ER and represented 25.3% of the cases, whereas 10.1% lack the expression of ER and HER2 and expressed at least one basal marker (P-CD, CK5, CK14, p63, vimentin and/or EGFR). These basal-like DCIS were mostly high-grade, with comedo-type necrosis, and consistently showed expression of P-CD and CK5. In conclusion, DCIS with a basal-like phenotype represent a small percentage in our series, being P-CD and CK5, the most useful adjunct markers to distinguish this subset of carcinomas in situ of the breast.     

Expression of intermediate filament proteins in subtypes of renal cell carcinomas and in renal oncocytomas. Distinction of two classes of renal cell tumors

We examined the expression of the diverse cytokeratin (CK) polypeptides as well as vimentin in human renal cell carcinomas of various subtypes and in renal oncocytomas by applying both two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and immunocytochemistry by using polypeptide-specific monoclonal antibodies. The tumors were classified according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization, with some modifications based primarily on recently proposed cytomorphological criteria. All clear cell carcinomas (G I, G II; N = 20) co-expressed CKs nos. 8 and 18, and vimentin, with CK no. 19 being present in 13 of the 20 cases and exhibiting a heterogeneous distribution. Dedifferentiated carcinomas (G III; N = 8) also co-expressed CKs nos. 8 and 18 as well as vimentin, but in addition, exhibited CK no. 19 and, in many cases, CK no. 7; in 1 case, only vimentin was expressed. Both eosinophilic-granular (N = 3) and basophilic (small cell cuboidal; N = 6) carcinomas contained CKs nos. 8 and 18, and the co-expression of vimentin was a consistent feature of these tumors; CK no. 19 was found in all of these cases, while CK no. 7 was present in the majority. In chromophobe cell carcinomas (N = 8), in contrast to all of the other carcinoma types, no vimentin was detected in the tumor cells, with only CKs nos. 8, 18, and to a variable extent 7, being present. Similarly, oncocytomas (N = 8) lacked vimentin and exhibited only CKs nos. 8 and 18. Conspicuous scattered CK no. 19-positive cells were found in these two last tumor types. No CK polypeptides other than simple-epithelium-type CKs (nos. 7, 8, 18, and 19) were detected in any of the tumors studied. These results indicate that, in renal cell tumors, the expression of intermediate-filament proteins is strikingly correlated with the specific morphologic appearance. While the co-expression of CKs nos. 8 and 18 and vimentin was a surprisingly consistent feature of the most common subtypes of renal cell carcinomas, CK no. 19 exhibited remarkable heterogeneity of expression both within individual tumors and between different tumors, the expression patterns of this CK being correlated to the tumor subtypes. The consistent absence of vimentin in chromophobe cell carcinomas and oncocytomas makes it possible to define these as a separate class of renal cell tumors. This finding supports the view that chromophobe cell carcinomas represent a distinct tumor entity and points to their close phenotypic relationship to benign oncocytomas as well as to normal renal tubules.     

Mesothelial markers in high-grade breast carcinoma

Duhig E E, Kalpakos L, Yang I A & Clarke B E
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 957–964 Mesothelial markers in high‐grade breast carcinoma Aims: Advances in molecular profiling have subdivided breast carcinomas into distinct subtypes. Basal carcinomas are generally oestrogen receptor (ER)?progesterone receptor (PR)?/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)?, and cytokeratin (CK)5/6+. This profile overlaps with that of mesothelial cells. This study of high‐grade breast carcinomas was undertaken to determine the expression of mesothelial markers. Methods and results: Immunohistochemistry was performed on 23 basal‐like breast carcinomas and 30 high‐grade breast carcinomas with variable ER, PR and HER2 expression. The incidence of staining of CK5/6, CK14, calretinin, Wilms’ tumour 1 (WT1), thrombomodulin and epithelial membrane antigen was assessed statistically. CK14 staining was more specifically associated with triple‐negative tumours than CK5/6. Calretinin positivity was statistically associated with basal‐like carcinomas. WT1 and thrombomodulin expression was infrequent and limited to a small number of non‐basal carcinomas. Conclusions: There is an overlap between the immunophenotype of mesothelial cells and that of basal‐like carcinomas of breast. Positive calretinin and CK5/6 are not specific, and may be seen in both mesothelial cells and basal‐like breast carcinomas. Negative ER and PR of basal carcinomas may also bias the observer against a breast origin. However, other negative mesothelial markers, such as WT1 and thrombomodulin, may help point to the correct diagnosis.