Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer -- acute toxicity

BACKGROUND: We report on acute toxicities as well as the early cosmetic outcome of patients receiving intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) followed by whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) compared to patients treated with standard WBRT alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2/2002 until 2/2005, 84 breast cancer patients were treated with IORT during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as a boost (20 Gy/50 kV X-rays) followed by WBRT. After wound healing, all IORT patients were treated with WBRT at a total dose of 46 Gy. For the purpose of comparison, 53 patients treated consecutively between 1/2003 and 12/2004 in our institution with BCS followed by WBRT at a total dose of 50-66 Gy, were analyzed. All patients had a defined followup schedule. Toxicities were prospectively documented using the CTC/EORTC Score. Cosmesis was evaluated after 6 months using a 1-4 score. RESULTS: Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3/4 acute toxicity. Rare adverse effects following IORT included wound healing problems (2%), erythema grade I-II (3%), palpable seroma (6%) and mastitis (2-4%). The number of patients with induration of the tumor bed was comparably low. CONCLUSION: IORT with the IntrabeamTM system applied as a boost during BCS, followed by 46 Gy WBRT, exerts similar acute toxicity as standard WBRT. Further follow-up is needed to assess long-term toxicity and efficacy.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-rays (30-50 KV) is an innovative technique that can be used both for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and intraoperative boosting in patients affected by breast cancer. Immediately after tumor resection the tumor bed can be treated with low-distance X-rays by a single high dose. Whereas often a geographic miss in covering the boost target occurs with external beam boost radiotherapy (EBRT), the purpose of IORT is to cover the tumor bed safely. This report will focus on the feasibility and technical aspects of the Intrabeam device and will summarize our experience with side effects and local control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and June 2003 57 breast cancer patients, all eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS), were treated at the Mannheim Medical Center with IORT using the mobile X-ray system Intrabeam. The patient population in this feasibility study was not homogeneous consisting of 49 patients with primary stage I or II breast cancer, seven with local recurrence after previous EBRT and one with a second primary in a previously irradiated breast. The selection criteria for referral for IORT included tumor size, tumor cavity size, margin status and absence of an extensive intraductal component. The previously irradiated patients with local recurrences and 16 others received IORT as single modality. In all other cases IORT was followed by EBRT with a total dose of 46 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. The intraoperatively delivered dose after tumor resection was 20 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. EBRT was delivered with a standard two-tangential-field technique using linear accelerators with 6- or 18-MV photons. Patients were assessed every three months by their radiation oncologist or surgeon during the first year after treatment and every six months thereafter. Breast ultrasound for follow-up was done every six months and mammographies once yearly. Acute side effects were scored according to the CTC/EORTC score and late side effects according to the Lent-Soma classification. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received IORT only; eight patients because they had received previous radiotherapy, 16 because of a very favorable risk profile or their own preference. Thirty-three patients with tumor sizes between 1 and 30 mm and no risk factors were treated by IORT as a boost followed by EBRT. The Intrabeam system was used for IORT. The Intrabeam source produces 30-50 KV X-rays and the prescribed dose is delivered in an isotropic dose distribution around spherical applicators. Treatment time ranged between 20 and 48 minutes. No severe acute side effects or complications were observed during the first postoperative days or after 12 months. One local recurrence occurred 10 months after surgery plus IORT followed by EBRT. In two patients distant metastases were diagnosed shortly after BCS. DISCUSSION: IORT with the Intrabeam system is a feasible method to deliver a single high radiation dose to breast cancer patients. As a preliminary boost it has the advantage of reducing the EBRT course by 1.5 weeks, and as APBI it might be a promising tool for patients with a low risk of recurrence. The treatment is well tolerated and does not cause greater damage than the expected late reaction in normal tissue.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for unresectable stage IVb pancreatic cancer

We evaluated the efficacy of IORT for unresectable Stage IVb (Japan Pancreas Society classification) pancreatic cancer. Twelve patients were treated with IORT, 17 with external beam radiotherapy (ERT) and 17 with chemotherapy (CHT, 8 patients doxorubicin-based, 7 patients 5-FU-based). Survival, hospital-free survival and pain relief were compared among the three groups. In the IORT group, 7 patients underwent bypass surgery, 3 celiac plexus blockade, 3 ERT, 2 hyperthermia and 2 CHT. In the ERT group, 1 patient underwent bypass surgery, 7 hyperthermia and 14 CHT. Distant metastases were more frequently found in the CHT group than in the IORT group. Median survival and median hospital-free survival were 208 and 79 days in the IORT group, 125 and 32 days in the ERT group and 76 and 9 days in the CHT group, respectively. Pain relief was obtained in 45% (5/11) of symptomatic patients after IORT and in 27% (4/15) after ERT. No patient (0/13) in the CHT group experienced pain relief. In conclusion, our experience suggests that IORT can reduce pain and improve QOL in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients

Conventional radiotherapy after breast-conserving therapy is confined to 50-55 Gy external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the whole breast and 10-16 Gy external boost radiation to the tumour bed or brachytherapy to the tumour bed. Local recurrence rate after breast-conserving surgery varies between 5 and 18%. External boost radiation can partially miss the tumour bed and therefore can result in local failure. Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) as a high precision boost can prevent a 'geographical miss'. From October 1998 to December 2000, 156 patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer were operated upon in a dedicated IORT facility. After local excision of the tumour, the tumour bed was temporarily approximated by sutures to bring the tissue in the radiation planning target volume. A single dose of 9 Gy was applied to the 90% reference isodose with energies ranging from 4 to 15 MeV, using round applicator tubes 4-8 cm in diameter. After wound healing, the patients received additional 51-56 Gy EBRT to the whole breast. No acute complications associated with IORT were observed. In 5 patients, a secondary mastectomy had to be performed because of tumour multicentricity in the final pathological report or excessive intraductal component. 2 patients developed rib necroses. In 7 patients, wound healing problems occurred. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, no local recurrences were observed. Cosmesis of the breast was very good and comparable to patients without IORT. Preliminary data suggest that IORT given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery could be a reliable alternative to conventional postoperative fractionated boost radiation by accurate dose delivery and avoiding geographical misses, by enabling smaller treatment volumes and complete skin-sparing and by reducing postoperative radiation time by 7-14 days.     

p53 alterations in human cancer: more questions than answers

The strongest and undisputed fact about p53 is the high frequency of p53 alterations in human cancer and that mutant p53 proteins constitute a complex family of several hundred proteins with heterogeneous properties. Beyond these observations, the p53 pathway and its regulation in a normal cell is like a desert trail, always moving with the wind of novel findings. The field is full of black boxes that are often ignored for sake of simplicity or because they do not fit with the current dominant view. Mutant p53 protein accumulation in tumours is the best example of a preconceived idea, as there is no experimental evidence to explain this observation. In this review, we will discuss several questions concerning the activity or selection of p53 mutations. The central domain of the p53 protein targeted by 80% of p53 mutations is associated with the DNA-binding activity of the p53 protein, but it is also the binding site for several proteins that play a key role in p53 regulation such as ASPP proteins or BclxL. The role of impaired DNA binding and/or protein interactions in tumour development has not been fully elucidated. Similarly, novel animal models carrying either missense p53 mutations or inducible p53 have provided abundant observations, some of which could challenge our view on p53 function as a tumour suppressor gene. Finally, the possible clinical applications of p53 will be discussed.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an option for patients with localized breast recurrences after previous external-beam radiotherapy

Background  

For patients suffering of recurrent breast cancer within the irradiated breast, generally mastectomy is recommended. The normal tissue tolerance does not permit a second full-dose course of radiotherapy to the entire breast after a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A novel option is to treat these patients with partial breast irradiation (PBI). This approach is based on the hypothesis that re-irradiation of a limited volume will be effective and result in an acceptable frequency of side effects. The following report presents a single center experience with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during excision of recurrent breast cancer in the previously irradiated breast.     

Concepts and techniques of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer

The standard treatment for early breast cancer comprises wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection, adjuvant medical treatment and radiotherapy to the whole breast. Many studies suggest that local control plays a crucial role in overall survival. The local recurrence rate is estimated to be 1% per year and varies between 4 and 7% after 5 years and up to 10 to 20% in the long-term follow up. On the basis of low local recurrence rates the concept of whole breast irradiation comes up for discussion, and partial breast irradiation (PBI) is increasingly under consideration. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is referred to as the delivery of a single high dose of irradiation directly to the tumor bed (confined target) during surgery. PBI (limited field radiation therapy, accelerated partial breast irradiation APBI) is the irradiation exclusively confined to a breast volume, the tumor surrounding tissue (tumor bed) either during surgery or after surgery without whole breast irradiation. Various methods and techniques for IORT or PBI are under investigation. The advantage of a very short radiation time or the integration of the complete radiation treatment into the surgical procedure convinces at a first glance. The promising short-term results of those studies must not fail to mention that local recurrence rates could probably increase and furthermore give rise to distant metastases and a reduction in overall survival. The combination of IORT in boost modality and whole breast irradiation has the ability to reduce local recurrence rates. The EBCTCG overview approves that differences in local treatment that substantially affect local recurrence rates would avoid about one breast cancer death over the next 15 years for every four local recurrences avoided, and should reduce 15-year overall mortality. This article is based on an invited lecture delivered at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, held in Yokohama June 29-30, 2007.     

Concepts and techniques of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer.

The standard treatment for early breast cancer comprises wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection, adjuvant medical treatment and radiotherapy to the whole breast. Many studies suggest that local control plays a crucial role in overall survival. The local recurrence rate is estimated to be 1% per year and varies between 4 and 7% after 5 years and up to 10 to 20% in the long-term follow up. On the basis of low local recurrence rates the concept of whole breast irradiation comes up for discussion, and partial breast irradiation (PBI) is increasingly under consideration. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is referred to as the delivery of a single high dose of irradiation directly to the tumor bed (confined target) during surgery. PBI (limited field radiation therapy, accelerated partial breast irradiation APBI) is the irradiation exclusively confined to a breast volume, the tumor surrounding tissue (tumor bed) either during surgery or after surgery without whole breast irradiation. Various methods and techniques for IORT or PBI are under investigation. The advantage of a very short radiation time or the integration of the complete radiation treatment into the surgical procedure convinces at a first glance. The promising short-term results of those studies must not fail to mention that local recurrence rates could probably increase and furthermore give rise to distant metastases and a reduction in overall survival. The combination of IORT in boost modality and whole breast irradiation has the ability to reduce local recurrence rates. The EBCTCG overview approves that differences in local treatment that substantially affect local recurrence rates would avoid about one breast cancer death over the next 15 years for every four local recurrences avoided, and should reduce 15-year overall mortality.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost for early breast cancer: long-term clinical and cosmetic results

PURPOSE: The standard radiotherapy (RT) of breast cancer consists of 50 Gy external beam RT (EBRT) to the whole breast followed by an electron boost of 10-16 Gy to the tumor bed, but this has several cosmetic disadvantages. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) could be an alternative to overcome these. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated 50 women with early breast cancer operated on in a dedicated IORT facility. Median dose of 10 Gy was delivered using 9-MeV electron beams. All patients received postoperative EBRT (50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions). Late toxicity and cosmetic results were assessed independently by two physicians according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v3.0 grading system and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9.1 years (range, 5-15 years), two local recurrences were observed within the primary tumor bed. At the time of analysis, 45 patients are alive with (n = 1) or without disease. Among the 42 disease-free remaining patients, 6 experienced Grade 2 late subcutaneous fibrosis within the boost area. Overall, the scores indicated a very good quality of life and cosmesis was good to excellent in the evaluated patients. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that IORT given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery is a reliable alternative to conventional postoperative fractionated boost radiation.     

Association of the I1307K APC mutation with hereditary and sporadic breast/ovarian cancer: more questions than answers

The frequency of the APC I1307K mutation and its association with disease pattern was examined in 996 Ashkenazi women consisting of individuals with either sporadic (n = 382) or hereditary (n = 143) breast and/or ovarian cancer; asymptomatic BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (185delAG, 5382insC and 6174delT) (n= 53) and healthy controls (n= 418). The I1307K allele was equally distributed among women with sporadic (17/382; 4.6%) and inherited (10/143; 7%) breast and/or ovarian cancer irrespective of their being diagnosed before or after 42 years of age and among asymptomatic (7/53; 13.2%) and cancer manifesting BRCA1/2 carriers (10/143; 7%). Taken together, the prevalence of the I1307K allele was significantly higher in BRCA1/2 carriers compared to non-BRCA1/2 carriers (17/196; 8.7% and 40/800, 5%; respectively). The high prevalence of the I1307K allele among BRCA1/2 carriers is not associated with increased cancer risk but seems to be genetically connected because of Jewish ancestry.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for locally unresectable pancreatic cancer

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of IORT for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer, 11 patients treated with IORT and 15 patients treated with palliative therapy only were retrospectively examined. The mean age of the IORT group was 61.9 years, 5 cases were classified into surgical stage IVa, and 6 into stage IVb. The mean age of the palliative therapy group was 69.1 years; 5 cases were classified into surgical stage IVa and 10 into stage IVb. The tumor size was measured in 6 cases in the IORT group, before and after IORT. The tumor was enlarged in 1 case, not changed in 4 cases, and reduced in 1 case. The serum CA19-9 level was measured in 8 cases of the IORT group. Serum CA19-9 was increased in 3 cases, not changed in 4 cases, and decreased in 1 case after IORT. ECOG pain scores were obtained in 9 patients who had complained of pain before IORT, and the score decreased in 7 cases. The median survival was 7.6 months in the IORT group and 3.0 months in the palliative therapy group. IORT may improve patients' QOL by decreasing their pain. However, further studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of IORT for survival of locally unresectable pancreatic cancer patients, because the patient profile in this study was different in the two groups.     

Concurrent whole-brain radiotherapy with trastuzumab for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients: questions and answers

PurposeWe retrospectively assessed the use of trastuzumab concurrently with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases.Patients and methodsFrom April 2001 to April 2007, 31 patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer were referred for WBRT with concurrent trastuzumab. In most cases, concurrent WBRT delivered 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. In six patients, other fractionations were chosen because of either poor performance status or patients’ convenience.ResultsAt time of brain progression, median age was 55 years (range: 38 to 73 years) and all patients had a performance status of 0 to 2. Median time to brain progression was 10.5 months. Following WBRT, radiological responses were observed in 23 patients (74.2%), including six patients (19.4%) with complete radiological responses and 17 patients (54.8%) with partial radiological response. Clinical responses were observed in 27 patients (87.1%). Median survival from the start of WBRT was 18 months (range: two to 65 months). No grade 2 or more acute toxicity was observed.ConclusionOur results suggest that trastuzumab concurrently with WBRT may have a potential clinical impact with low toxicity. Although promising, these preliminary data warrant further validation of trastuzumab as radio sensitizer for WBRT in brain metastases from breast cancer in the setting of a clinical trial. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.