First treatment for brain metastases by stereotactic radiosurgery]

Local control of brain metastases is better with first treatment by stereotactic radiosurgery than with radiosurgery for recurrence. We reported a retrospective analysis of the influence of clinical and technical factors on local control and survival after radiosurgery realised in first intention. From January 1994 to December 1997, 26 patients presenting with 43 metastases underwent radiosurgery. The median age was 61 years and the median Karnofsky index 70. Primary sites included: lung (12 patients), kidney (7 patients), breast (2 patients), colon (1 patient), melanoma (2 patients), osteosarcoma (1 patient), it was unknown for one patient. Seven patients had extracranial metastases. Twenty-one sessions of radiosurgery have been realized for one metastase, and 9 for two, three or four lesions. The median diameter was 21 mm and the median volume 1.8 cm3. The median peripheral dose to the lesion was 14 Gy, and the median dose at the isocenter 20 Gy. Forty-two metastases were evaluable for response analysis. The overall local control rate was 90.5% and the 1-year, 2- and 3-year actuarial rates were 85% and 75%. In univariate analysis, theorical radioresistance was significantly associated with better local control (100% versus 77%, p < 0.05). All patients were evaluable for survival. The median survival rate was 15 months. Four patients had a symptomatic oedema (RTOG grade II). Two lesions have required a surgical excision. In conclusion, low dose radiosurgery (14 Gy delivered at the periphery of metastasis) can be proposed in first intention for brain metastases, in particularly for theorical radioresistant lesions.     

Fractionations in radiotherapy of brain metastases

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate different fractionations for radiotherapy of brain metastases. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients treated with whole brain cobalt therapy (WBRT) were examined to evaluate the effect on survival and quality of life of three different dose fractionations (2 Gy x 25, 3 Gy x 10 and 4 Gy x 5). Fractionation was evaluated in relation to mean survival, single or multiple lesions, presence of extracranial metastases, primary tumor control and neurological status before and after treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival and univariate and multivariate analysis of these factors were performed. Twenty-six (21%) patients were treated with 2 Gy x 25, 48 patients (38%) with 3 Gy x 10 and 42 patients (33%) with 4 Gy x 5. The other 9 patients were treated with unusual fractionations. RESULTS: In 66% of patients an improvement in neurological status after radiotherapy was recorded. Patients with controlled primary tumors had a better mean survival, 8.6 months, if they had no extracranial metastases. The six-month survival was 21% in the 4 Gy x 5 group, 36% in the 3 Gy x 10 group, and 21% in the 2 Gy x 25 group; the results for one-year actuarial survival were highly similar in the three fractionation groups (5%, 11% and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 5 x 4 Gy fractionation may be appropriate in lung cancer patients, where no significant difference in 6- and 12-month survival was observed with respect to the other fractionation groups despite the most unfavorable prognosis of these patients and the lower biological effectiveness of this fractionation with respect to the other schedules.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Multiple brain metastases are a common health problem, frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer. The prognosis, even after treatment with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), is poor with average expected survivals less than 6 months. Retrospective series of stereotactic radiosurgery have shown local control and survival benefits in case series of patients with solitary brain metastases. We hypothesized that radiosurgery plus WBRT would provide improved local brain tumor control over WBRT alone in patients with two to four brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with two to four brain metastases (all < or =25 mm diameter and known primary tumor type) were randomized to initial brain tumor management with WBRT alone (30 Gy in 12 fractions) or WBRT plus radiosurgery. Extent of extracranial cancer, tumor diameters on MRI scan, and functional status were recorded before and after initial care. RESULTS: The study was stopped at an interim evaluation at 60% accrual. Twenty-seven patients were randomized (14 to WBRT alone and 13 to WBRT plus radiosurgery). The groups were well matched to age, sex, tumor type, number of tumors, and extent of extracranial disease. The rate of local failure at 1 year was 100% after WBRT alone but only 8% in patients who had boost radiosurgery. The median time to local failure was 6 months after WBRT alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.5) in comparison to 36 months (95% CI, 15.6-57) after WBRT plus radiosurgery (p = 0.0005). The median time to any brain failure was improved in the radiosurgery group (p = 0.002). Tumor control did not depend on histology (p = 0.85), number of initial brain metastases (p = 0.25), or extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.26). Patients who received WBRT alone lived a median of 7.5 months, while those who received WBRT plus radiosurgery lived 11 months (p = 0.22). Survival did not depend on histology or number of tumors, but was related to extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.02). There was no neurologic or systemic morbidity related to stereotactic radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined WBRT and radiosurgery for patients with two to four brain metastases significantly improves control of brain disease. WBRT alone does not provide lasting and effective care for most patients.     

Factors associated with tumor response and survival in radiosurgery for brain metastasis

Background We reviewed our experience with radiosurgery for brain metastasis and focused on factors associated with tumor response and survival. Methods Our study consists of 19 patients with 25 brain metastases who underwent linear accelerator radiosurgery. There was evidence of extra-central nervous system (CNS) tumors in 15 patients. The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 3 to 40 mm with a mean of 20 mm. Tumor doses at the isocenter varied from 16 to 25 Gy with a mean of 21 Gy. Eighteen lesions were treated by radiosurgery alone and 7 lesions received combined radiosurgery with fractionated radiotherapy. Of the 11 patients who experienced CNS failure either in or out of the radiosurgery field, 6 patients had salvage radiotherapy. Results Median survival was 7 months, and the 1-year actuarial survival rate was 40%. Death was due to extra-CNS tumor manifestations in 11 patients. In 3 patients, CNS failure was the cause of death. One died of local progression, and the other 2 died of newly developed metastases. Poor Karnofsky performance scores and the presence of extra-CNS tumors significantly affected 1-year survival in univariate analysis (P<0.05). Local tumor control was achieved in 80% of the lesions. The 1-year actuarial tumor control rate was 51%. Newly developed brain metastases were observed in 7 patients. The tumor diameter was mostly associated with tumor response in multiple regression analysis (P=0.0031). Conclusion We concluded that radiosurgery is effective in controlling small brain metastasis. Survival benefit is expected for those with good performance status and adequately controlled extra-CNS disease. Part of this work was presented at the 7th Asian and Oceanian Congress of Radiology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, May 28-June 1, 1995.     

The impact of whole-brain radiation therapy on the long-term control and morbidity of patients surviving more than one year after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE: To better analyze how whole-brain radiotherapy (WBXRT) affects long-term tumor control and toxicity from the initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, we studied these outcomes in patients who had survived at least 1 year from SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the results of gamma knife radiosurgery for 160 brain metastases in 110 patients who were followed for a median of 18 months (range, 12-122 months) after SRS. Eighty-two patients had a solitary brain metastasis and 28 patients had multiple metastases. Seventy patients (116 tumors) were treated with initial radiosurgery and WBXRT, whereas 40 patients (44 lesions) initially received radiosurgery alone. Median treatment volume was 1.9 cc in the entire group, 2.3 cc in the WBXRT group, and 1.6 cc in the SRS alone group. Median tumor dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-21 Gy). RESULTS: At 1, 3, and 5 years, local tumor control was 84.1% +/- 5.5%, 68.6% +/- 8.7%, and 68.6% +/- 8.7% with SRS alone compared with 93.1% +/- 2.4%, 87.7% +/- 4.9%, and 65.7% +/- 10.2%. with concurrent WBXRT and SRS (p = 0.0228, univariate). We found that WBXRT improved local control in patient subsets tumor volume > or =2 cc, peripheral dose < or =16 Gy, single metastases, nonradioresistant tumors, and lung cancer metastases (p = 0.0069, 0.0080, 0.0083, 0.0184, and 0.0348). Distal intracranial failure developed at 1, 3, and 5 years in 26.0% +/- 7.1%, 74.5% +/- 9.4%, and 74.5% +/- 9.4% with SRS alone compared with 20.7% +/- 4.9%, 49.0% +/- 8.7%, and 61.8% +/- 12.8% with concurrent WBXRT and SRS (p = 0.0657). We found a trend for improved distal intracranial control with WBXRT for only nonradioresistant tumors (p = 0.054). Postradiosurgery complications developed in 2.8% +/- 1.2% and 10.7% +/- 3.5% at 1 and 3-5 years and was unaffected by WBXRT (p = 0.7721). WBXRT did not improve survival in the entire series (p = 0.5027) or in any subsets. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of 1-year survivors of SRS for brain metastases, the addition of concurrent WBXRT to SRS was associated with an improved local control rate in patient subsets with tumor volume > or =2 cc, peripheral dose < or =16 Gy, single metastases, nonradioresistant tumors, and specifically lung cancer metastases. A trend was noted for improved distal intracranial control for patients having nonradioresistant tumors. Distant intracranial relapse >1 year posttreatment is a significant problem with or without initial WBXRT.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: a score index for predicting prognosis

Purpose: To analyze a prognostic score index for patients with brain metastases submitted to stereotactic radiosurgery (the Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases [SIR]).

Methods and Materials: Actuarial survival of 65 brain metastases patients treated with radiosurgery between July 1993 and December 1997 was retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic factors included age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extracranial disease status, number of brain lesions, largest brain lesion volume, lesions site, and receiving or not whole brain irradiation. The SIR was obtained through summation of the previously noted first five prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves for all prognostic factors, SIR, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) (RTOG prognostic score) were calculated. Survival curves of subsets were compared by log-rank test. Application of the Cox model was utilized to identify any correlation between prognostic factors, prognostic scores, and survival.

Results: Median overall survival from radiosurgery was 6.8 months. Utilizing univariate analysis, extracranial disease status, KPS, number of brain lesions, largest brain lesion volume, RPA, and SIR were significantly correlated with prognosis. Median survival for the RPA classes 1, 2, and 3 was 20.19 months, 7.75 months, and 3.38 months respectively (p = 0.0131). Median survival for patients, grouped under SIR from 1 to 3, 4 to 7, and 8 to 10, was 2.91 months, 7.00 months, and 31.38 months respectively (p = 0.0001). Using the Cox model, extracranial disease status and KPS demonstrated significant correlation with prognosis (p = 0.0001 and 0.0004 respectively). Multivariate analysis also demonstrated significance for SIR and RPA when tested individually (p = 0.0001 and 0.0040 respectively). Applying the Cox Model to both SIR and RPA, only SIR reached independent significance (p = 0.0004).

Conclusions: Systemic disease status, KPS, SIR, and RPA are reliable prognostic factors for patients with brain metastases submitted to radiosurgery. Applying SIR and RPA classifications to our patients’ data, SIR demonstrated better accuracy in predicting prognosis. SIR should be further tested with larger patient accrual and for all patients with brain metastases subjected or not to stereotactic radiosurgery.     

Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases

Purpose: Melanoma is one of the most common malignancies to metastasize to the brain. Many patients with this disease will succumb to central nervous system (CNS) disease, highlighting the importance of effective local treatment of brain metastases for both palliation and survival of the disease. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes associated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients with a total of 103 tumors treated with SRS. Twenty patients had prior surgical resection and nine patients underwent prior whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). 71% of patients had active extracranial disease at the time of SRS. Median number of tumors treated with SRS was 1(range: 1-6) with median radiosurgery tumor volume 2.1 cm 3 (range: 0.05-59.7 cm 3 ). The median dose delivered to the 80% isodose line was 24 Gy in a single fraction. Results: The median follow-up from SRS was five months (range:1-30 months). Sixty-five percent of patients had a follow-up MRI available for review. Actuarial local control at six months and 12 months was 87 and 68%, respectively. Eighty-one percent of patients developed new distant brain metastases at a median time of two months. The six-month and 12-month actuarial overall survival rates were 50 and 25%, respectively. The only significant predictor of overall survival was surgical resection prior to SRS. Post-SRS bleeding occurred in 18% of patients and at a median interval of 1.5 months. There was only one episode of radiation necrosis with no other treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion: SRS for brain metastases from melanoma is safe and achieves acceptable local control.     

Computer simulation of cytotoxic and vascular effects of radiosurgery in solid and necrotic brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Solid and necrotic brain tumors respond to radiosurgery, although necrotic lesions often contain a significant proportion of hypoxic cells which cannot become reoxygenated during the short overall treatment time of single dose application. In addition to the direct cytotoxic action, delayed vascular occlusion followed by ischemic tumor cell death could contribute to the effect of radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to determine the impact of the two possible effects on tumor response, a 3-dimensional computer simulation was developed and fitted to response data obtained from 90 patients who were treated by LINAC radiosurgery for 1-3 brain metastases with median marginal doses of 20 Gy. Complete response rates were as follows: small, solid lesions (diameter 0.4-1 cm), 52% (12/23); large solid lesions (1.1-5.2 cm), 28% (17/60); large necrotic lesions, 12% (6/50). The 3-dimensional computer model simulated the growth of small solid and large, solid or necrotic tumors situated in a vascularized stroma. Oxygen supply, tumor cell division (cell cycle time 5 days), neovascularization, tumor cell kill by single dose irradiation (linear-quadratic model, alpha/beta=10 Gy, oxygen enhancement ratio 3.0) and time-dependent vascular occlusion (alpha/beta=3 Gy) were modeled by Monte-Carlo simulation techniques. RESULTS: In the presence of neovascularization, solid tumors with a hypoxic fraction of 1-2% developed. Without neoangiogenesis, central necrosis occurred, and tumors had a hypoxic fraction of 20-25%. Assuming a pure cytotoxic effect of radiosurgery, neither the dose-response relationship for the solid lesions of different size nor that for the large lesions with solid or necrotic appearance could be reproduced for any given level of radiosensitivity. This was only possible by introducing a vascular effect that led to the occlusion of >/=99% of the vessels at the border of the target volume within 1 year after irradiation. In the presence of the vascular effect, the apparent radiosensitivity of the tumor cells was increased by 50-100%. Calculations of the dose-equivalent for the vascular effect show that it contributes 19-33% of the overall effect of single dose radiosurgery. CONCLUSION: This simulation study suggests that the therapeutic effect of single radiosurgery in malignant brain tumors cannot be understood without the consideration of vascular effects. The computer model might serve as a basis for exploring new treatment modalities that modify both cytotoxic and vascular effects of radiosurgery.     

Whole-brain radiotherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for patients in recursive partitioning analysis classes 1 and 2 with 1 to 3 brain metastases

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated whether stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone improved outcomes for patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases compared with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS: Data regarding 186 patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases and who received either 30 to 40 grays (Gy) of WBRT (n = 91 patients) or 18 to 25 Gy SRS (n = 95 patients) were analyzed retrospectively. Eight other potential prognostic factors were evaluated regarding overall survival (OS), entire brain control (BC), local control (LC) of treated metastases, and brain control distant from treated metastases (distant control [DC]): Those 8 factors were age, sex, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to radiotherapy. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis of OS, age ( risk ratio [RR], 1.51; P = .024), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (RR, 1.98; P = .002), and extracranial metastases (RR, 2.26; P < .001) were significant, whereas the radiation regimen was not significant (P = .89). On multivariate analysis of BC, only the radiation regimen (RR, 1.33; P = .003) was found to be significant. On multivariate analysis of LC, radiation regimen (RR, 1.63; P < .001) and sex (RR, 1.62; P = .022) were significant. On multivariate analysis of DC, KPS (RR, 1.85; P = .049) and extracranial metastases (RR, 1.69; P = .047) were significant. The radiation regimen was not found to be significant even on univariate analysis (P = .80). In RPA class subgroup analyses, BC and LC were better after SRS than WBRT for patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2, whereas OS and DC did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: For patients in RPA Classes 1 and 2 who had 1 to 3 brain metastases, SRS alone was associated with improved BC and LC compared with 30 to 40 Gy WBRT, whereas OS and DC were not significantly different. Similar results were observed in separate subgroup analyses of patients in RPA Class 1 and RPA Class 2.     

Brain metastases in patients with no known primary tumor

BACKGROUND: The care of patients with a brain metastasis from unknown primary site is controversial. The authors reviewed the results of stereotactic radiosurgery in this group of patients to better define clinical expectations. METHODS: During an 11-year interval, radiosurgery was performed in 421 patients with brain metastases at the University of Pittsburgh. Fifteen patients had solitary or multiple (< or = 5) brain metastases without a detectable primary site at the time of initial presentation. In five patients, a histologic diagnosis of cancer was obtained from extracranial metastatic sites. In 10 patients, a diagnosis was obtained from the brain. A total of 31 tumors with a mean volume of 4.3 mL (range, 0. 05-18.6 mL) underwent radiosurgery with a mean marginal dose of 16.2 Gray (Gy) (range, 12-20 Gy). Fourteen patients (93.3%) also received whole brain fractionated radiation therapy. RESULTS: The median survival was 15 months after radiosurgery (range, 1-48 months) and 27 months after their initial diagnosis of cancer. In 4 patients (26. 7%), the primary tumor was discovered later (lung in 3 patients and liver in 1). Three of these four patients died due to progression of their primary tumor. Of the remaining 11 patients, 4 died of progression of extracranial metastases, 2 died of other systemic diseases, and 3 patients died because of progression of brain metastasis. Three patients (20%) were still living between 21-48 months after radiosurgery. The presence of active systemic disease and brain stem location both were associated with a poor outcome (P = 0.004 and 0.04). The actuarial imaging-defined local tumor control rate was 91.3 +/- 5.9% at 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosurgery was an effective strategy for patients with brain metastases from an unknown primary site. Disease progression outside of the brain was the usual cause for patient death.     

Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery, with or without whole-brain radiation therapy, has become a valued management choice for patients with brain metastases, although their median survival remains limited. In patients who receive successful extracranial cancer care, patients who have controlled intracranial disease are living longer. The authors evaluated all brain metastasis in patients who lived for > or = 4 years after radiosurgery to determine clinical and treatment patterns potentially responsible for their outcome. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with brain metastases underwent 781 radiosurgery procedures between 1988 and 2000. Data from the entire series were reviewed; and, if patients had > or = 4 years of survival, then they were evaluated for information on brain and extracranial treatment, symptoms, imaging responses, need for further care, and management morbidity. These long-term survivors were compared with a cohort who lived for < 3 months after radiosurgery (n = 100 patients). RESULTS: Forty-four patients (6.5%) survived for > 4 years after radiosurgery (mean, 69 mos with 16 patients still alive). The mean age at radiosurgery was 53 years (maximum age, 72 yrs), and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90. The lung (n = 15 patients), breast (n = 9 patients), kidney (n = 7 patients), and skin (melanoma; n = 6 patients) were the most frequent primary sites. Two or more organ sites outside the brain were involved in 18 patients (41%), the primary tumor plus lymph nodes were involved in 10 patients (23%), only the primary tumor was involved in 9 patients (20%), and only brain disease was involved in 7 patients (16%), indicating that extended survival was possible even in patients with multiorgan disease. Serial imaging of 133 tumors showed that 99 tumors were smaller (74%), 22 tumors were unchanged (17%), and 12 tumors were larger (9%). Four patients had a permanent neurologic deficit after brain tumor management, and six patients underwent a resection after radiosurgery. Compared with the patients who had limited survival (< 3 mos), long-term survivors had a higher initial KPS (P = 0.01), fewer brain metastases (P = 0.04), and less extracranial disease (P < 0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expected survival of patients with brain metastases may be limited, selected patients with effective intracranial and extracranial care for malignant disease can have prolonged, good-quality survival. The extent of extracranial disease at the time of radiosurgery was predictive of outcome, but this does not necessarily mean that patients cannot live for years if treatment is effective.     

Treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by stereotactic linac-based radiosurgery: prognostic factors

A restrospective study of patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is performed to identify patients who benefit from radiosurgery and to determine prognostic factors for survival. Eighty-six consecutive patients with a total of 110 brain metastases from NSCLC were treated with linac-based radiosurgery. Six patients with eight brain metastases who received radiosurgery as a focal boost to whole brain radiotherapy where excluded. Median age at treatment was 60 years. Median dose was 20 Gy/80%-isodose. A chi(2)-test was used to identify potential prognostic factors for local control of brain metastases and survival of the patients. Median follow-up was 6 months (range 1 1/2-77 months) with 17/80 patients still alive. Median actuarial survival was significantly longer (P<0.004) in patients with metachronous onset of brain metastases in comparison to synchronous onset (8.3 vs. 3.3 months). Survival was significantly increased after radiosurgery in the absence of extracranial tumor progression (P<0.03). Eleven patients (14%) developed new brain metastases after radiosurgery after a latency of median 5 months. Actuarial local control rate was 96% after 3 months. Local control was significantly increased with a prescribed dose > or=18 Gy/80%-isodose (P<0.01). We conclude that especially patients with poor prognostic factors and a limited number of brain metastases may be palliatively treated with radiosurgery alone. This approach allows to effectively control CNS manifestation of the disease and can be integrated into chemotherapeutic protocols.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral metastatic melanoma: factors affecting local disease control and survival

Purpose: The development of a brain metastasis represents an ominous event for patients with malignant melanoma. We evaluated results after stereotactic radiosurgery (SR) for patients with metastastic melanoma to identify patient outcomes and factors for survival.Methods: The authors reviewed the management results of 60 consecutive patients with melanoma metastases, with a total of 118 melanoma brain metastases, undergoing SR during a 9-year interval. Of these, 51 also had whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). A total of 118 tumors of mean volume of 2.95 ml (range, 0.1–25.5 ml) were treated by SR with a mean margin dose of 16.4 Gy (range, 10 to 20 Gy). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine significant prognostic factors affecting survival in 60 patients.Results: Median survival was 7 months after SR in all 60 patients and 10 months from brain tumor diagnosis (mean follow-up period, 9.3 months). Lack of active systemic disease and a solitary metastasis were associated with improved survival in multivariate analysis (median, 15 months). The imaging-defined local control rate of evaluable tumors (n = 72) was 90% (disappearance = 11%, shrinkage = 44%, and stable = 35%). Local recurrence developed in 7 patients and remote brain disease developed in 14 patients. WBRT combined with radiosurgery did not improve survival nor local tumor control. New brain metastases developed less often when WBRT was added to SR (23% vs. 44%), but this difference was not significant. Only 4 patients (7%) died from progression of a radiosurgery-managed tumor. No patient developed a delayed radiation-related complication, but 3 patients developed delayed intratumoral hemorrhage at the radiosurgery site, 2 of whom had new symptoms.Conclusions: Stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastasis is effective and is associated with few complications. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with solitary tumors.     

Local Recurrence of Metastatic Brain Tumor after Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Surgery Plus Radiation

In this study, we compared the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors after radiosurgery versus after surgery plus radiation, and analyzed the factors associated with the recurrence of brain metastases. Twenty-eight and 35 patients with metastatic brain tumors underwent radiosurgery (52 lesions) and surgery plus radiation (46 lesions), respectively, between 1995 and 2001. The median tumor volume was 1.55ml (range: 0.02–10.4ml) in radiosurgery patients and 17.9ml (range: 0.26–195ml) in surgery plus radiation patients. The median radiosurgical tumor central and margin doses were 28.9 and 23.8Gy (range: 20–35 and 25–15Gy), respectively. The median total dose was 46.7Gy (range: 30–63Gy) in the surgery plus radiation group.The recurrence time from surgery plus radiation group (25 months) was significantly longer than that from the radiosurgery group (7.2 months) (p=0.0199). The factors affecting the recurrence of brain metastases after radiosurgery were size, central dose of radiation and histology (colon vs. others). No factors affected the recurrence of brain metastases after surgery plus radiation. To avoid early recurrences of metastatic brain tumors, surgery plus radiation is the preferable therapeutic modality. The size and histology of brain metastases, and the dose of radiation should be considered for the effective treatment of tumors by radiosurgery.     

Dose-response relationships for radiotherapy of brain metastases: role of intermediate-dose stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy

The effects of intermediate-dose radiotherapy consisting of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT, 10 fractions of 3 Gy) plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were studied prospectively. Twenty-five adult patients with 31 brain metastases received WBRT plus linear accelerator (LINAC)-based single dose SRS with fixed treatment parameters (10 Gy at the isocenter, target volume enclosed by the 90% isodose). Median age was 63 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80%, and median diameter of brain metastases 2.4 cm. Fifteen patients had non-small-cell lung cancer. Because of some early deaths, only 26 lesions could be evaluated for response. We observed 1 complete and 15 partial remissions. Median time to progression inside or outside the SRS volume was 4.5 months. Actuarial local control of SRS-treated lesions was 61% at 1 year. At that time, only 37% of patients were free from new lesions outside the SRS volume. Median survival and cause-specific survival were 2.3 and 4.5 months, respectively (1-year survival rate 8% and 21%). Ten patients died of progressive brain metastases, 13 from extracranial disease progression (unknown cause of death in 2 cases). Comparable to SRS studies with higher doses, the majority of brain failures occurred outside the SRS volume and more patients died of extracranial progression than of uncontrolled brain metastases. Failure to improve survival can be explained by the high percentage of patients with extracranial metastases (52%). However, the present results appear less favorable than those of previous studies of SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy (1-year actuarial local control rates of 66-89%). Therefore, we recommend SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy for patients whose favorable prognostic factors justify a boost after WBRT.     

Initial treatment of melanoma brain metastases using gamma knife radiosurgery: an evaluation of efficacy and toxicity

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is the primary malignancy that is most likely to metastasize to the brain. Because such an event carries an almost uniformly poor prognosis, the current study reviewed outcomes and identified associated prognostic indicators for 51 consecutive patients receiving gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery in the initial treatment of 188 intracranial melanoma metastases. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from a single-center GK radiosurgery database and from primary patient medical records and radiographs. RESULTS: At presentation, 71% of patients had multiple intracranial metastases, and extracranial metastases were present in 66% of patients. Thirty-two patients (63%) were initially treated with GK radiosurgery alone, whereas the remainder received GK radiosurgery in combination with surgery and/or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Overall median survival from time of GK radiosurgery was 26 weeks. Subgroup analysis revealed a median survival of 77 weeks for patients presenting with a single lesion, compared with 20 weeks for patients presenting with multiple lesions (P = 0.003). Patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class I survived a median of 57 weeks, compared with a median survival of 20 weeks for patients in RPA Class II or III (P = 0.002). Although long-term imaging follow-up revealed that a majority of patients experienced distant brain metastases, multivariate analysis showed that distant metastases occurred significantly sooner in patients with extracranial metastases (P = 0.0004). Addition of initial WBRT had no significant effect on the time to development of new brain metastases (P = 0.13). Local control (crude) was observed in 81% of lesions initially treated with GK. Patients experienced improved or stable symptoms for a median of 37 weeks post-GK radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Survival analyses supported the use of GK radiosurgery in the initial treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases, with best results occurring in patients presenting with a single lesion.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), for the treatment of 1-4 brain metastases, using a non invasive fixation of the skull, was investigated. METHODS: Between 04/2001 and 01/2006 30 patients with 44 brain metastases underwent irradiation. Every patient received WBRT (10 x 3 Gy); 41/44 lesions received HSRT boost with a median dose fraction of 6 Gy, the fractionation schemes were 3 x 6 Gy and 4 x 8 Gy; a median total dose of 18 Gy was delivered to the tumor isocenter. RESULTS: The median survival period was 9.15 months, the actuarial 1-year overall survival and freedom from new brain metastases were 36.6% and 87.9%, respectively; at univariate analysis Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was statistically significant (P = 0.05); the actuarial 1-year local control for the 41/44 lesions was 86.1%. No patient had acute or late complications. CONCLUSIONS: HSRT as a concomitant boost during WBRT is a safe and well tolerated treatment for selected patients with brain metastases.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes after a single stereotactic radiosurgery procedure for the care of patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred five patients with primary malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (42%), breast carcinoma (23%), melanoma (17%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), colon cancer (3%), and others (10%) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for 4 or more intracranial metastases at one time. The median number of brain metastases was 5 (range, 4-18) with a median total treatment volume of 6.8 cc (range, 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (46%) or after failure of whole brain radiotherapy (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). The mean follow-up was 8 months. RESULTS: The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. The 1-year local control rate was 71%, and the median time to progressive/new brain metastases was 9 months. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system, the median overall survivals for RPA classes I, II, and III were 18, 9, and 3 months, respectively (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed total treatment volume, age, RPA classification, and marginal dose as significant prognostic factors. The number of metastases was not statistically significant (p = 0.333). CONCLUSION: Radiosurgery seems to provide survival benefit for patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Because total treatment volume was the most significant predictor of survival, the total volume of brain metastases, rather than the number of metastases, should be considered in identifying appropriate radiosurgery candidates.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: the Tuebingen experience.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate the effectiveness of linear accelerator based radiosurgery (RS) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 55 patients with a total of 72 BM, 41 patients had a single brain metastasis and 14 patients had two or three metastases. Median tumour dose of 15Gy (range 8-20Gy) was prescribed to a median isodose surface of 90% (range 70-100%) encompassing the target volume. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) for all 55 patients was 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-10 months] and 2-year survival is 18%. There was no significant difference between patients who had one brain metastasis and those with either two or three metastases (log rank P=0.7565). Multivariate analysis in patients with a single BM showed that interval between primary diagnosis (PD) to BM, maximum size of metastasis, and histology (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma versus others) were independent prognostic factors influencing survival. Local control was obtained in 66/72 (92%) metastases. Actuarial local control at 24 months was 52%. Only age (50 years) and histology (renal cell versus others) influenced local control in the univariate analysis in patients with a single BM. In multivariate analysis, size, histology (renal cell and melanoma versus others), activity of extracranial metastatic disease, age, interval from PD to BM and location (midline versus other) independently influenced local control, while the dose was not significant for our patient group. Only one patient developed radiographically suspected RS-induced necrosis after previous whole brain RT. CONCLUSION: RS was effective and little toxic in BM. Identification of prognostic factors must be performed to gain knowledge on patients most likely to benefit from this procedure.     

Selection of patients with melanoma brain metastases for aggressive treatment

The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases that can be recommended for patient selection for clinical trials. A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients irradiated for brain metastases from 1990 to 1997. Pretreatment factors analyzed for influence on survival included age, stage, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial metastases, the number and location of brain lesions, disease-free interval from initial diagnosis, total dose of radiation, and number of fractions administered. Prognosis was also analyzed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) classes. The data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival was 4 months. RPA class distribution was I-25%, II-48%, and III-28% with a median survival of 6.5, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0098 by log-rank test). KPS less than 70% (p = 0.0039), and the presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.03), predicted a worse prognosis on univariate analysis. Both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. The prognosis of patients receiving radiotherapy for brain metastases is related to RPA class, the presence of extracranial metastases, and KPS. These criteria should be employed in selecting patients for aggressive protocol treatment, or for more protracted brain irradiation off protocol.