Effect of a standardized pharyngitis treatment protocol on use of antibiotics in a pediatric emergency department

BACKGROUND: Pharyngitis is a common complaint in pediatric patients. If clinical parameters are used alone, bacterial pathogens will be wrongly implicated in many cases. A nonstandardized approach to the treatment of children with pharyngitis in an emergency department setting may lead to inappropriate empirical therapy, contribute to increased bacterial resistance, and result in adverse events related to the treatment provided. OBJECTIVE: To implement evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of children with pharyngitis in an emergency department setting and thereby influence practices of prescribing antibiotics. DESIGN AND METHODS: An evidence-based guideline for the evaluation and treatment of patients with pharyngitis was developed and implemented in our emergency department. Preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were identified by a search of the emergency department's clinical repository. A medical record review was performed using a standardized data abstraction form (history and examination data, diagnostic testing, and therapy provided). Treatment decisions were judged as appropriate if the diagnosis of pharyngitis caused by group A beta-hemolytic streptococci was based on confirmatory microbiological testing rather than on the history and physical examination findings alone. RESULTS: We included 443 patients for study (219 preintervention and 224 postintervention). In the preintervention group, 97 (44%) of 214 received appropriate treatment. In the postintervention group, 204 (91%) of 224 received appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based clinical guideline can influence and improve practices of prescribing antibiotics by pediatric emergency physicians in a teaching hospital setting.     

Effect of recent antipyretic use on measured fever in the pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of recent antipyretic use among febrile infants at a pediatric emergency department (ED) and to test the hypothesis that recent antipyretic use is associated with lower measured temperatures in the ED. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled infants younger than 366 days at a pediatric ED. Eligible subjects had a history of fever prior to arrival at the ED or had a measured temperature of 38 degrees C or higher at the ED. Research assistants collected detailed information about recent use of antipyretic drugs. Peak measured temperature prior to arrival at the ED (temperature maximum [Tmax]), measured temperature at the ED, defervescence from Tmax to measured ED temperature, and rates of diagnostic testing were compared between subjects who had or had not been treated with antipyretic medication within the past 6 hours. RESULTS: We enrolled 474 infants. Infants treated with an antipyretic medication (n = 187) had a significantly higher Tmax and a significantly higher measured ED temperature than untreated subjects (n = 287) (P<.001). Treated and untreated subjects did not differ in the amount of defervescence from Tmax to measured ED temperature (P = .41) unless treated subjects included only those who reportedly received therapeutic doses of antipyretic medication within 1 to 5 hours prior to arrival at the ED (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although many febrile infants seen in the pediatric ED have recently received antipyretics, only a few have received a therapeutic dose between 1 and 5 hours prior to arrival. Among febrile infants seen in the ED, recent antipyretic use is associated both with a higher reported Tmax and with higher measured temperatures at the ED. Patients treated with a therapeutic antipyretic dose 1 to 5 hours prior to arrival experience more defervescence from their Tmax than untreated subjects.     

Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department.

We undertook a prospective study of 377 children (two to 16 years old) presenting with abdominal pain to determine: 1) common discharge diagnoses; 2) what signs and symptoms are associated with appendicitis; and 3) follow-up of patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). Nine diagnoses accounted for 86% of all diagnoses made. The most common final diagnosis was "abdominal pain" (36%). The following findings were significantly associated with appendicitis: vomiting, right lower quadrant(RLQ) pain, tenderness, and guarding (all P less than 0.001). Ninety-seven percent (28/29) of patients with appendicitis had at least two of these four signs and symptoms, as did 28% (96/348) of patients without appendicitis. The sensitivity of the model is 0.96, and the specificity is 0.72 (positive predictive value = 0.24; negative predictive value = 0.99). Of the patients contacted within one week of the visit (237), 75% reported that the pain had resolved (mean contact time, 2.6 days). We conclude that 1) patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain often leave with the diagnosis of abdominal pain; 2) of the patients contacted, the majority reported that their pain has resolved; and 3) a diagnosis of appendicitis should be considered in any patient with any two of the following signs or symptoms: vomiting, guarding, tenderness, or RLQ pain. Such patients should be evaluated and observed carefully for the possible diagnosis of appendicitis.     

Interfacing with police in the pediatric emergency department.

In summary, ED staff and local police departments should make a concerted effort to work together. The ED director should develop management protocols in conjunction with local police chiefs to plan strategies in advance. It is helpful to provide "orientation sessions," so that each group of professionals knows what to expect of the other. It may also be helpful to arrange tours of the ED so that police know where to go when they are called to the ED. All of these efforts should foster better care of children in the ED and will reduce tensions between the dedicated groups who work with such children.     

Professional liability in a pediatric emergency department

The risk of professional liability resulting from care given in the pediatric emergency department is a growing concern. This retrospective study examined the patients, diagnoses, and outcome of all threatened and actual claims that originated in the emergency department of a pediatric teaching hospital from 1977 through 1988. Twenty-five cases were identified by the hospital risk manager from approximately 320,000 visits (8.0 cases/100,000 visits); 22 charts were available for review. Ages of the patients ranged from 2 weeks to 13 years (mean 2.9 years, median 3.0 years). The patients' payment status was private insurance (n = 10), state public aid (n = 5), and no third-party payment source was listed for 7 children. Ten patients (46%) visited the emergency department between midnight and 8:00 AM, when an attending physician was not present. Return visits within 2 weeks for the same complaint occurred in 10 cases. The majority of the patients were discharged home (n = 18), and all of them had appropriate, adequately documented discharge instructions. The final diagnoses fell into four general categories: minor trauma/abuse (n = 7), neoplasms/chronic illnesses (n = 7), infectious diseases (n = 6), and appendicitis (n = 2). Review of the charts before knowledge of the legal outcome raised quality-of-care issues in 41% of the cases (n = 9).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Medication errors in a pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE: To initiate investigation into the medication errors that occur in a pediatric emergency department. These errors have the potential for significant morbidity and mortality, as well as costly litigation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all medication and intravenous fluid errors identified in a pediatric emergency department through incident reports filed over a 5-year period. An attempt was made to determine who was involved with the errors and what caused the errors. The patient outcomes were noted and classified according to clinical significance using previously published criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-three incident reports involving medication or intravenous fluid errors were analyzed. Most errors occurred on the evening and night shifts. Nurses were involved in 39% of reported errors; the nurse and emergency physician were jointly involved in 36%. The most common error was an incorrect dose of medication (35%) or incorrect medication given (30%). In one third of the cases, the family was not made aware of the error. In 12%, patients required additional treatment, and one was admitted to the hospital because of the error. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Incorrect recording of patient weights leading to an incorrect medication dose and failure to note drug allergy are common causes for medication errors in the pediatric emergency department. Incorrect drugs and i.v. fluids are given because of similar names and packaging. Many of the errors in the ED seem to be preventable.     

The activities of a pediatric emergency department. The emergency problems]

The authors reviewed records of admission at the Fist Ais-Emergency Service of "G. Gaslini" Children's Hospital, data referring both to in and outpatients. First of all we took into account epidemiological data analysing occurrence and types of diseases; at the same time a demographic study, which aimed to show a decrease in the child population in Genova, was performed. Secondly we compared these data with the real number of admitted patients: collected data showed that this service has been used excessively.     

Has Medicaid promoted needless pediatric emergency department use?

The possibility that Medicaid has encouraged pediatric emergency department (ED) use was explored as part of a study of 8470 ED visits to a pediatric teaching hospital in the period from 1975 to 1976. The proportion of the population on Aid to Dependent Children (proportion on ADC) was taken as a reasonable proxy for prevalence of Medicaid coverage of children in an area. Visit subgroups were compared using mean proportions on ADC in the census tracts of origin to measure relative rates of ED use by poor children. If Medicaid has promoted use of the ED instead of other facilities, the data would be expected to indicate relatively heavy ED use by residents of tracts with a high prevalence of Medicaid: (1) during the week when other facilities are most available; and (2) for minor problems which do not result in admission. The data show no differences in the mean proportion on ADC in the census tracts of origin of ED visits on weekdays as compared to weekends or for visits which resulted in admission as compared with those which did not. The data challenge the idea that Medicaid has encouraged pediatric ED use.     

规范儿科急诊预检与分诊

分析儿科急诊预检分诊的国内外现状,阐述急诊预检分诊的目的及正确实施预检分诊在急诊医疗服务中的重要性,提出对儿科急诊预检分诊的建议和设想.