动、静脉结合r-tPA溶栓治疗早期脑梗死

目的 评价动、静脉结合r-tPA溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的方法和临床疗效.方法 共15例急性脑梗死患者,术前均行CT、MR 和DSA检查证实颅内动脉闭塞部位：M1段4例,M2段2例,M3、4段2例,A1、2段1例,颈内动脉2例, P1段1例,豆纹动脉1例,其他穿支2例.其中术前经DSA证实12例.溶栓治疗时间在发病后3～7 h,采用动脉内药物灌注和机械疏通相结合方法溶栓,另外经静脉术前和术后持续滴注r-tPA辅助.术后观察临床症状和影像表现.结果 15例患者溶栓治疗中微导管和溶栓导管均到位满意,DSA所示闭塞段血管均有效再通.术后CT检查发现片状渗血2例,异位脑梗死1例.术后肢体功能即刻明显改善6例.临床观察3个月,症状基本完全恢复6例,较好改善7例,2例无明显改善;生活能力完全自理13例,有效率达87%（13/15）,生活能部分自理者1例,失去生活自理能力 1例,无患者死亡.结论 动、静脉结合溶栓治疗急性颅内动脉栓塞是一种有效、安全的治疗方法;局部动脉内灌注和机械疏通有效结合以及术前各项影像学检查的综合分析,将有利于动脉溶栓治疗的进行.     

rt-PA动脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的疗效观察

目的分析动脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的安全性及疗效。方法对21例颈内动脉系统梗死患者(颈内动脉3例,大脑中动脉12例,大脑前动脉5例,豆纹动脉1例)进行rt-PA动脉溶栓治疗。治疗时间在发病后2～6h,观察术中血管再通及术后即刻、24h后分别行头颅CT或MRI扫描以明确有无颅内出血。术前及术后30d采用中国脑卒中神经功能缺损程度量表(chinese stroke scale)进行评估。结果21例患者动脉溶栓治疗中技术成功率100%。其中血管再通TMI分级2～3级16例,TMI分级0～1级5例。症状性脑出血3例,其中2例死亡。17例术后30d神经功能缺损评分减少>50%,2例<50%,死亡2例。TMI分级2～3级的血管再通患者生活状态明显优于TMI分级0～1级血管再通患者。结论急性脑梗死6h内动脉溶栓治疗比较合适,但也有并发脑出血的严重后果,开始溶栓时间越早越好。     

Thrombolyse der Arteria cerebri media

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the evidence-based treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the first 3 h after symptom onset (IVT 3–4.5 h: off-label use with informed consent of the patient). However, intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) results in higher recanalization rates of the middle cerebral artery compared to IVT. Therefore it seems reasonable to apply IAT in addition or instead of IVT up to 6 h after symptom onset.     

动脉内接触性溶栓治疗急性脑梗死时间窗选择与疗效分析

目的 探讨动脉内接触性溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的时间窗选择与疗效的关系.资料与方法 245例脑梗死均在CT检查及血管造影基础上接受选择性动脉内接触性溶栓治疗,其中在发病后6 h以内溶栓者56例,6～24 h溶栓者189例.分析两组患者的血管再通率和90天预后.结果 脑血管造影发现颈内动脉(ICA)系统闭塞173例,椎基底动脉(VBA)系统闭塞72例;溶栓后ICA系统再通113例,VBA系统再通37例.治疗后90天预后好者180例,预后差者65例.溶栓后颅内出血12例.6 h内组和6～24 h组患者血管内溶栓治疗后90天预后良好率分别为80.35 %(45/56)和71.43 %(135/189),血管再通率分别为66.07%(37/56)和59.79%(113/189),血管再通中位时间分别为67 min和73 min.结论 动脉内接触性溶栓可以明显改善脑梗死患者的预后,仅以发病时间不超过6 h作为动脉内溶栓治疗标准不够全面,应当根据病情适当放宽动脉内溶栓的时间窗.     

急性脑梗死动脉内溶栓治疗疗效观察

目的观察急性脑梗死患者行脑动脉内溶栓治疗的临床疗效。方法26例临床及头颅CT诊断为急性脑梗死患者用尿激酶行经动脉介入溶栓治疗(IATT)，治疗前后均作脑血管造影、复查CT及神经功能缺损评分。结果3例造影未见血管闭塞，23例患者即刻完全再通7例，部分再通11例，再通率78e。结论动脉溶栓疗法使84％的患者在15d内神经功能缺损得到改善，脑动脉内溶栓治疗是治疗急性脑梗死有效的方法之一。     

急性脑梗死两种溶栓治疗方法的安全性与疗效比较

 目的对比观察急性脑梗死(combinedintra-arterial,ACI)超早期行动静脉联合溶栓与静脉溶栓的临床疗效及安全性。方法系统性回顾分析68例行动静脉联合溶栓或静脉溶栓治疗的ACI患者的临床资料,比较两组术后闭塞血管再通率、术后NIHSS评分、并发症等。结果联合组、静脉组患者术后7d与术前相比,NIHSS评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P＜0.01)。两组患者术后24h、术后7dNIHSS评分相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后闭塞血管再通率相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后出血发生率及病死率相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.5)。结论对于ACI的治疗,动静脉联合溶栓的疗效优于静脉溶栓。     

急性脑梗塞动脉内溶栓治疗时间窗选择与疗效分析

目的探讨急性脑梗塞动脉内溶栓治疗时间及梗塞部位等因素对疗效的影响。方法288例脑梗塞患者均在CT检查及血管造影基础上接受选择性动脉溶栓治疗,其中在6h以内溶栓者76例,6~24h溶栓者212例。统计2组患者的血管再通率和90d后预后情况。结果脑血管造影发现血管闭塞245例,其中颈内动脉系统闭塞173例,椎基底动脉(VBA)闭塞72例;溶栓后再通分别为112例、38例。治疗后90d恢复良好者180例,预后差108例。颅内出血2例。不同治疗时间2组患者治疗后90d预后良好率分别为80.35%和71.43%,血管再通率分别为67.86%和59.26%,血管再通中位时间分别为68min和73min。结论动脉溶栓治疗脑梗塞,动脉内溶栓时间窗与多种因素密切相关。     

Hyperacute therapy of acute ischemic stroke: intraarterial thrombolysis and mechanical revascularization strategies

Ischemic stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite the fact that it is the third most common cause of death in the United States, there is only one FDA approved treatment for patients. This is Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator given within 3 hours of symptom onset. Furthermore, despite the approval of this drug, it has been underutilized in the community. The limited time window of 3 hours disqualifies many patients from receiving the drug. In addition, fears of intracranial hemorrhage have resulted in underutilization of the drug in the community setting. Efforts to increase the time window to treatment include utilization of the intraarterial route for delivery of thrombolytic drug and interventional mechanical strategies to revascularize intracranial vessels. In this report we review the major intraarterial thrombolysis trials and review the mechanical strategies being developed to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke.     

rt-PA动脉内溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的临床研究

目的观察重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)动脉内溶栓(IAT)治疗急性脑梗死的疗效及并发症,分析预后相关因素。方法对12例发病后20h内的急性缺血性脑梗死患者行IAT治疗。血管再通程度根据“急性心肌梗死溶栓标准”(TIMI)分类。临床结果评价在溶栓后20d进行,根据改良的Rank分数(MRS)分为良好(MRS0～3)、不良(MRS4～6)两类。结果溶栓前1例为TIMI1,11例为TIMI0。溶栓后9例闭塞血管部分／完全再通,3例未再通。8例患者结果良好;4例不良结果;其中2例死亡。发生症状性脑出血1例,经治疗恢复良好。结论rt-PA用于急性脑梗死动脉溶栓,是安全可行的。     

急性脑血栓的动脉内溶栓治疗

急性缺血性脑卒中主要由脑血管血栓形成所致,占急性脑血管病的50%～60%,是中枢神经系统最常见的致死和致残性疾病.缺血“半暗带”理论的提出,为脑梗死溶栓治疗提供了理论依据.随着医学影像学的发展及神经介入技术的进步,动脉内溶栓技术已经成为急性颅内动脉血栓形成的主要治疗方法之一,现介绍如下.     

超选择性动脉溶栓联合血管内干预治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的临床探讨

目的探讨超选择性动脉溶栓联合血管内干预治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性。方法回顾分析我院住院治疗的21例进行超选择性动脉溶栓的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床资料。结果21例患者中,颈内动脉系统病变16例．其中颈内动脉闭塞2例,大脑中动脉主干及分支闭塞6例,大脑前动脉闭塞1例,脑血管造影未见异常者7例。椎基底动脉闭塞5例,闭塞血管再通者,大脑中动脉4例,椎基底动脉2例。其中7例患者动脉溶栓的同时进行了血管内治疗,5例球囊成形术和2例支架植入术。临床症状完全恢复7例,明显好转或进步8例,无效3例,死亡3例;溶栓后脑出血2例．存活病例无1例并发脑出血及消化道出血。结论对选择的急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行超选择性动脉溶栓联合血管内干预治疗是安全有效的。     

Balloon catheter disruption of middle cerebral artery thrombus in conjunction with thrombolysis for the treatment of acute middle cerebral artery embolism

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to prospectively assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of balloon disruption of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) by using a deflated balloon catheter combined with an intra-arterial thrombolysis for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven consecutive patients with clinical findings of acute major-vessel stroke met our criteria and underwent balloon disruption of an MCA thrombus with a deflated balloon catheter. The balloon disruption was performed with a low-profile microballoon catheter. The microballoon was inflated in the distal carotid artery and then deflated and advanced just distal to the occlusion site in the MCA. Thereafter, an intra-arterial thrombolysis of the MCA was applied. The maximum time from the onset of symptoms to the start of treatment and maximum dosage of urokinase was 6 hours and 600,000 U. The outcome was classified as good for a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1, moderate for a score of 2 or 3, and poor for a score of 4 or 5. RESULTS: Complete recanalization was achieved in 5 patients and partial recanalization in 3. Three patients recovered to an mRS score of 0 or 1; 3, to scores of 2 or 3; and 1, to a score of 4. No patients died. There was no major intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: The penetration of the MCA with a deflated balloon catheter combined with an intra-arterial thrombolysis may be a safe and effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke.     

急性脑梗死溶栓治疗的时间窗及其影响因素分析

目的 分析急性脑梗死患者不同时间的动脉内溶栓治疗效果,探讨影响治疗时间窗的因素.方法 54例脑梗死患者均在CT检查及血管造影基础上接受选择性动脉溶栓治疗其中在6 h以内溶栓者42例,6～24 h溶检者12例.统计两组患者术后血管再通率和神经功能缺失积分差值.结果 两组患者治疗有效率分别为88.1%和75.0%,显效率分别为71.4%和50.0%, 管再通率分别为69.0%和50.0%,血管再通中位时间分别为68和73min.结论 动脉内溶检时间窗是与多种因素密切相关的,仅以发病时间不超过6 h作为治疗标准是不够全面的,应当根据病情合理放宽溶栓的时间窗,最大限度降低患者的病残率,提高了患者的生活质量.     

Reocclusion of recanalized arteries during intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early reocclusion of recanalized arteries has been observed after thrombolysis for acute coronary occlusion and has been attributed to platelet activation after exposure to thrombolytic agents. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the rate of reocclusion during intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke and the effect of reocclusion on functional outcome. METHODS: Patients treated for acute ischemic stroke at our center between September 2000 and May 2002 received a maximum total dose of 4 U of reteplase intra-arterially in 1-U increments via superselective catheterization. Pharmacologic thrombolysis was supplemented by mechanical thrombolysis with balloon angioplasty or snare manipulation at the occlusion site. Angiography was performed after each unit of reteplase or mechanical maneuver, and the images were interpreted by a blinded reviewer. Reocclusion was defined as partial or complete initial recanalization with occlusion recurring at the same site as documented by angiography during the endovascular treatment. Reocclusions were treated by further pharmacologic and/or mechanical thrombolysis according to the discretion of the treating physician. Clinical evaluations were performed before and 24 hr, 7 to 10 days, and 1 to 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Forty-six consecutive patients underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis. Reocclusion was observed in eight (17%). Among these patients, initial sites of occlusion were in the following arteries: intracranial internal carotid artery (n = 2), M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (n = 3), M1 and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery (n = 2), and basilar artery (n = 1). The mean initial National Institutes of Health Scale score for these eight patients was 23.3 +/- 6.2; mean time from symptom onset to treatment was 4.4 +/- 1.2 hr. The reocclusions were treated by using additional doses of reteplase alone (n = 1), reteplase with snare maneuver and/or angioplasty (n = 5), reteplase with angioplasty or snare and then stent placement (n = 1), and angioplasty with stent placement (n = 1). The reocclusions resolved in six of eight patients after further treatment. Six patients died and two survived but were severely disabled at 1 month (modified Rankin Scale scores of 4 and 5, respectively). Independent functional outcome scores (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2) were significantly lower among patients with angiographically shown reocclusion than in those without (0 of 8 versus 17 of 38, P =.02). CONCLUSION: Reocclusion occurs relatively frequently during intra-arterial thrombolysis for ischemic stroke and seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes.     

Clinical MRI of acute ischemic stroke

The most important service that imaging provides to patients with ischemic stroke is to rapidly identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from immediate treatment. This group includes patients who have severe neurological symptoms due to an occlusion of a major artery, and who are candidates for recanalization using intravenous thrombolysis or intra-arterial intervention to remove the occlusion. Outcomes for these patients are determined by symptom severity, the artery that is occluded, the size of the infarct at the time of presentation, and the effect of treatment. MRI provides key physiological information through MR angiography and diffusion MRI that has been proven to be of high clinical value in identify patients who are in need of immediate treatment. Perfusion MRI provides information about the ischemic penumbra, but its clinical value is unproven. In current clinical practice, the time since stroke onset is dominant over physiologic information provided by MRI in treatment decisions. This will change only when clinical trials prove that stroke physiology as revealed by MRI is superior to time from stroke onset in promoting good clinical outcomes.     

缺血性脑卒中超早期静脉溶栓治疗

目的 :评价超早期尿激酶静脉溶栓疗法对急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性。材料和方法 :随机选择 2 0例急性缺血性脑卒中患者 ,发病时间在 6h以内 ,半小时之内静脉滴注尿激酶 15 0× 10 4U/人 ,溶栓前、溶栓后 15min及 2 4h分别做血管造影检查 ,并记录比较患者溶栓前后临床神经功能缺损评分 (欧洲脑卒中评分 )及治疗 90天研究终点时的BarthelIndex和改良RankinScale。结果 :大脑中动脉闭塞 8例 ,6例完全再通 ,1例部分再通 ;大脑前动脉闭塞 1例 ,完全再通 ;颈内动脉闭塞 6例 ,3例部分开通 ,3例未通 ;豆纹动脉闭塞的 5例 ;4例临床完全恢复。本组病例中 2例继发症状性脑出血。有 3例患者死亡 ,死亡率为 15 %。结论 :超早期静脉溶栓可以使闭塞的血管再通 ,改善患者预后 ,但必需严格把握适应证 ,否则会增加脑出血的发病率及患者的死亡率。     

Intra-arterial reteplase compared to urokinase for thrombolytic recanalization in acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reteplase (RP) and urokinase (UK) are being used "off-label" to treat acute ischemic stroke. The safety and efficacy of intra-arterial RP or UK in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, however, has yet to be proved. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP compared with UK in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of cases from a prospectively collected stroke data base on consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion by digital subtraction angiography treated with intra-arterial RP or UK. Thrombolytic dosage, recanalization rate, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), mortality, and outcome were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received RP and 22 received UK (mean doses, 2.5 +/- 1.4 mg and 690,000 +/- 562,000 U, respectively). Vascular occlusions included 9 basilar arteries (BAs), 7 internal carotid arteries (ICAs), and 17 middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) with RP and 9 BAs, 4 ICAs, and 9 MCAs with UK. Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scales were as follows: 16 (range, 5-25; 81% > or = 10) with RP and 17 (range, 6-38; 85% > or =10) with UK. Mean time from symptom onset to thrombolytic initiation: 333 +/- 230 minutes with RP and 343 +/- 169 minutes with UK. Recanalization rates were as follows: 82% with RP and 64% with UK (P = .13). Symptomatic ICH rates were as follows: 12% with RP and 4.5% with UK (P = .50). The mortality rate was 24% with RP and 27% with UK (P = .8). CONCLUSION: Although limited in statistical power, our study suggests that, although IA thrombolysis with RP shows a trend for higher recanalization rates and hemorrhage rates, IA thrombolysis with RP is not significantly different in recanalization, outcome, mortality, and ICH compared with that of UK or rates reported with IA pro-UK.     

急性期缺血性脑梗塞的动脉内溶栓治疗

目的：报道和评价动脉内溶栓对急性期缺血性脑梗塞的治疗效果。方法：选择从１９９８年５月以来临床诊断的急性期缺血性脑梗塞患者９例（男８例,女１例）,行动脉内溶栓治疗,年龄在４７～８０岁之间,溶栓方法为将８０ＩＵ位尿激酶溶于８０ｍｌ５生理盐水内,在１ｈ以内经导管缓慢注入,病人病情在入院时、灌注后２４ｈ、１周、３月内由神经科医生以欧洲中风评分法（ＥＳＳ）综合评价。结果：溶栓治疗后３例血管得以再通,所有病人     

Intra-arterial thrombolysis: tissue plasminogen activator and other thrombolytic agents

Recanalization rates with the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke are low. Adjuvant endovascular techniques that achieve recanalization by direct intra-arterial (IA) delivery of thrombolytics, mechanical clot retrieval, clot aspiration, and stenting may complement intravenous pharmacotherapy. IA thrombolytics can be administered within 6 hours of symptom onset in anterior circulation strokes and within 24 hours in posterior circulation strokes. This review describes the indications, patient selection, and technique for IA administration of thrombolytics.     

多模式MRI指导下动脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中

目的:评价发病4.5～9h、MRI上有PWI/DWI不匹配、且MRA有责任血管闭塞或重度狭窄的急性缺血性卒中患者动脉溶栓(IAT)的疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析发病4.5～9h、MRI上有PWI/DWI不匹配、且有责任血管闭塞或重度狭窄的急性缺血性卒中患者48例,分为IAT组22例及对照组26例,比较其症状性出血率及3个月mRS。结果:IAT组与对照组症状性出血率为9.1%(2/22)与3.8%(1/26),P=0.454。IAT组结局良好,3个月mRS 0～2者占59.1%(13/22),多于对照组30.8%(8/26),P=0.049。结论:对于时间窗为4.5～9h、MRI上有PWI/DWI不匹配、且MRA上有责任血管闭塞或重度狭窄的急性缺血性卒中患者,组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)IAT可提高血管再通率,改善预后。