Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have revealed patients with ocular hypertension to have thicker than normal central corneas and those with normal tension glaucoma to have thinner than normal ones, as determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. Since corneal thickness measurements and applanation tonometric estimates of intraocular pressure (IOP) correlate positively, monitoring of the former parameter have served as the basis for adjusting readings pertaining to the latter, with the consequence that many patients have had to be reclassified. With a view to validating these pachymetric studies, the central corneal thickness was determined in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension, as well as that of normal subjects, using optical low coherence reflectometry, which is a new and more precise method than ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: 34 patients with normal tension glaucoma, 20 with primary open angle glaucoma, 13 with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and 12 with ocular hypertension, together with 21 control subjects, were included in this observational, concurrent case-control study. One eye per individual was randomly selected for investigation. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness by optical low coherence reflectometry. RESULTS: Central corneal thickness was significantly higher (p < or =0.001) in patients with ocular hypertension than in normal individuals or in subjects with either normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, there being no significant differences between the latter four groups. Patients with ocular hypertension were also significantly younger (p < or =0.003) than those within any of the three glaucomatous groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that a significant number of patients with ocular hypertension have normal IOPs after the appropriate adjustments have been made for deviations from normal in their central corneal thickness. The accurate measurement of this latter parameter is important not only for individual patient care, in permitting more precise estimations of IOP, but also for clinical studies, in assuring a more reliable classification of subjects.     

Optic disc area in different types of glaucoma

AIM: To evaluate the possible relationship of optic disc area with retina nerve fiber layer in different glaucoma subtypes. METHODS: One eye each was chosen from 45 patients with ocular hypertension, 45 patients with primary open angle glaucoma, 45 patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and 45 healthy controls followed in our hospital. The records of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. Optic disc area and circumpapillary retina nerve fiber layer measurements were obtained using optical coherence tomography. Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. RESULTS: The median disc area in the patients with primary open angle glaucoma was significantly higher than the patients with ocular hypertension (2.19 vs 1.90 mm2, P=0.030). The median retina nerve fiber layer was thinner in the patients with primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma than the patients with ocular hypertension for superior, inferior and temporal quadrants. After adjustment for age, no difference in central corneal thickness was found between the groups. Greater disc area was associated with thicker retinal nerve fiber layer for superior, inferior and nasal quadrants in the patients with primary open angle glaucoma. There was no correlation between disc area and central corneal thickness measurements of the groups. CONCLUSION: Disc size affects the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma and is a possible risk factor for glaucomatous optic nerve damage.     

Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To assess possible correlations between central corneal thickness, tonometry, and ocular dimensions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen eyes of 117 patients who were not taking any intraocular pressure-lowering medications were studied prospectively. Forty-one patients had ocular hypertension; 13 patients had primary open-angle glaucoma; and 10 patients had normal-pressure glaucoma. Twenty-three healthy eyes were included. Thirty glaucoma suspects (10 patients monitored for possible normal-pressure glaucoma and 20 patients with intermittent ocular hypertension) were included for correlation analysis. Tonometry was performed with Goldmann applanation and pneumotonometry, and central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and axial length were measured ultrasonically. RESULTS: Central corneal thickness was lowest in eyes with normal-pressure glaucoma (538 +/- 51 microm), highest in eyes with ocular hypertension (570 +/- 32 microm), and intermediate and similar in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy eyes (547 +/- 34 microm and 554 +/- 32 microm, respectively). These differences were significant (P = 0.028). Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness were weakly correlated (r = 0.12, P = 0.205), with a 0.2-mm Hg change per 10-microm variation in central corneal thickness. Pneumotonometry measurements were more strongly correlated with central corneal thickness (r = 0.21, P < 0.05). Lens thickness was strongly correlated with age (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Anterior chamber depth was negatively correlated with lens thickness and age (r = -0.29, P < 0.005 and r = -0.25, P < 0.01). Axial length was correlated with anterior chamber depth and age (r = 0.5, P < .001 and r = -0.19, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Eyes diagnosed as having ocular hypertension have thicker corneas and eyes labeled as having normal-pressure glaucoma have thinner corneas, when compared with healthy eyes or eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. The effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry accuracy appears to be small and usually not clinically relevant. When corneal thickness is markedly different from normal, the clinician may need to factor this into diagnosis and management.     

Comparison of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and suspected glaucoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the newest generation optical coherence topography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (SLP-VCC) in eyes with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and suspected glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One eye each of 84 patients (30 with glaucoma, 26 with suspected glaucoma, and 28 with ocular hypertension) was included in the study. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured with both technologies and thickness parameters were compared in the three groups of eyes. The correspondence of RNFL thickness measurements with visual field function was also studied. RESULTS: Average OCT-RNFL thickness was found to have a statistically significant difference between patients with glaucoma and either suspected glaucoma or ocular hypertension. A statistically significant correlation between the average RNFL thicknesses measured by the two different technologies was shown only in the glaucoma group. A significant correlation with visual field mean deviation was found for superior average RNFL thickness as measured by SLP and for nerve fiber indicator and average and inferior average RNFL thickness as measured by OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Regression analysis indicated nerve fiber indicator to be the most valuable factor in predicting mean deviation. CONCLUSION: RNFL thickness measurements obtained with OCT and SLP-VCC correlate well only in eyes with more advanced glaucomatous damage. The nerve fiber indicator parameter derived by SLP correlated best with mean deviation.     

Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma

AIMS: To evaluate central corneal thickness determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various types of glaucoma, and its influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. METHODS: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by using OCT in 167 subjects (167 eyes). 20 had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 42 had low tension glaucoma (LTG), 22 had ocular hypertension (OHT), 10 had primary angle closure glaucoma (AC), 24 had pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEX), 13 had pigmentary glaucoma (PIG), and 36 were normal. RESULTS: CCT was significantly higher in ocular hypertensive subjects (593 (SD 35) microm, p <0.0001) than in the controls (530 (32) microm), whereas patients with LTG (482 (28) microm, p < 0. 0001), PEX (493 (33) microm, p <0.0001), and POAG (512 (30) microm, p <0.05) showed significantly lower readings. There was no statistically significant difference between the controls and patients with PIG (510 (39) microm) and AC (539 (37) microm). CONCLUSIONS: Because of thinner CCT in patients with LTG, PEX, and POAG this may result in underestimation of IOP, whereas thicker corneas may lead to an overestimation of IOP in subjects with OH. By determining CCT with OCT, a new and precise technique to measure CCT, this study emphasises the need for a combined measurement of IOP and CCT in order to obtain exact IOP readings.     

The role of central corneal thickness in the diagnosis of glaucoma

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on applanation tonometry and any resultant misclassification of normals as ocular hypertension. METHOD: The central corneal thickness was measured using the ultrasound pachometer in 50 normals, 25 glaucoma and 23 ocular hypertensive patients. The student's "t" test was used to determine any significant difference in CCT between the three groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean CCT of the ocular hypertensives (0.574 +/- 0.033 mm) as compared to the glaucomas (0.534 +/- 0.030 mm) and normals (0.537 +/- 0.034 mm). Applying the described correction factor for corneal thickness, 39% of eyes with ocular hypertension were found to have a corrected IOP of 21 mmHg or less. CONCLUSIONS: Increased corneal thickness in ocular hypertension may lead to an overestimation of IOP in 39% of cases. Measurement of central corneal thickness is advisable when the clinical findings do not correlate with the applanation IOP.     

Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma

BACKGROUND: It is possible that the intraocular pressure (IOP) is underestimated in eyes whose central cornea is thinner than normal. The objective of this study was to determine and establish the significance of central corneal thickness in patients with low-tension (normal-tension) glaucoma compared with those with chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) or ocular hypertension and healthy eyes. METHODS: The study was carried out from February 1998 to May 1999. Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry and IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry in 25 patients with low-tension glaucoma (untreated IOP less than 21 mm Hg with evidence of optic nerve head damage and corresponding visual field loss on automated perimetry), 80 patients with COAG (untreated IOP 21 mm Hg or greater with evidence of optic nerve head damage and corresponding visual field loss on automated perimetry), 16 patients with ocular hypertension (untreated IOP 21 mm Hg or greater, with normal optic nerve head and no history of glaucoma or elevated IOP, and normal visual field on automated perimetry) and 50 control subjects (untreated IOP less than 21 mm Hg with normal optic nerve head and no history of glaucoma or elevated IOP). Analysis with Pearson's product-moment correlation was performed to determine the correlation of IOP and central corneal thickness, and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare corneal thickness between groups. RESULTS: The central cornea was significantly thinner in the low-tension glaucoma group (mean 513.2 mu [standard deviation (SD) 26.1 mu]) than in the COAG group (mean 548.2 mu [SD 35.0 mu]) and the control group (mean 556.7 mu [SD 35.9 mu]) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in corneal thickness was found between the COAG and control groups. The ocular hypertension group had significantly thicker corneas (mean 597.5 mu [SD 23.6 mu]) than the three other groups (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Patients with low-tension glaucoma may have thinner corneas than patients with COAG and healthy subjects. This results in underestimation of their IOP. Corneal thickness should be taken into account when managing these patients to avoid undertreatment.     

Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the amount of glaucomatous optic nerve damage at presentation of the patient and the rate of progression of glaucoma during follow-up are related to central corneal thickness. METHODS: The prospective observational clinical study included 861 eyes of 454 white subjects (239 normal eyes of 121 subjects, 250 ocular hypertensive eyes of 118 patients, 372 eyes of 215 patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma). For 567 eyes (304 patients) with ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma, follow-up examinations were performed, with a mean follow-up time of 62.7 +/- 33.2 months (median, 60.8; range, 6.2-124.9). All patients underwent qualitative and morphometric evaluation of color stereo optic disc photographs and white-on-white visual field examination. Central corneal thickness was measured by corneal pachymetry. RESULTS: Central corneal thickness correlated significantly (P < 0.001) and positively with the area of the neuroretinal rim and negatively with the loss of visual field. Development or progression of glaucomatous visual field defects detected in 119 (21.0%) eyes was statistically independent of central corneal thickness, in univariate (P = 0.99) and multivariate Cox regression analyses (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: At the time of patient referral, the amount of glaucomatous optic nerve damage correlated significantly with a thin central cornea. Progression of glaucomatous optic nerve neuropathy was independent of central corneal thickness, suggesting that central corneal thickness may not play a major role in the pathogenesis of progressive glaucomatous optic nerve damage.     

Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation of central corneal thickness (CCT) to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT, PASCAL), and to glaucoma stage as assessed by cup-to-disc ratio (CDR). DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional tricenter observation study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From three glaucoma specialty practices a sample of 406 independent eyes was included. After ultrasound pachymetry, intraocular pressure was measured using PASCAL and Goldmann applanation tonometry and cup-to-disc ration was reassessed. Demographic data were included in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Mean corneal thickness was 540 microm. African Americans and normal-tension glaucoma patients showed the lowest values (518 microm and 522 microm, respectively). These values were significantly thinner than the central corneal thickness of Caucasians (549 microm) and ocular hypertensives (564 microm). Intraocular pressure assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometry shows a significant correlation with central corneal thickness (r = 0.068, P < 0.001), whereas PASCAL is not significantly associated with central corneal thickness (r < 0.001, P = 0.997). Increased IOP is significantly correlated with large ocular pulse amplitudes (r = 0.13, P < 0.001), which is predominantly seen in ocular hypertensives. A significant negative correlation was detected between cup-to-disc ratio and central corneal thickness (r = 0.102, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Glaucoma patients with thin central corneal thickness are more likely to be found at an advanced stage of the disease and among those with normal-tension glaucoma and black African ancestry. Underestimation of intraocular pressure by Goldmann applanation tonometry could be one causative factor.     

Central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Central corneal thickness was measured with the use of ultrasound pachymeter in 49 eyes of 30 children, with congenital glaucoma aged 0-12 years. RESULTS: Mean central corneal thickness was 462 microm. Very wide differences between minimum and maximum recorded values were observed (380-780 microm). Three groups of patients could be distinguished: with very thin cornea of 380-450 microm (73% children), with normal corneal thickness of about 550 microm (15%) and with very thick cornea of 680-780 microm (12% patients). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Mean central corneal thickness in children with congenital glaucoma is significantly thinner than in healthy children in the same age and in adult patients with glaucoma. A very wide differences between minimum and maximum recorded values, are observed in these patients. 2. The results of applanation tonometric measurements are underestimated in most cases or less frequently overestimated. 3. The measurements of central corneal thickness should be performed in every patient with congenital glaucoma to correct the IOP values.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement in the measurement of intraocular pressure obtained by dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, to investigate the effect of corneal thickness on pressure readings by both instruments, and to assess the reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometer. METHODS: NCT and DCT measurements were made on 104 eyes of 104 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (n=75) or ocular hypertension (n=29), and agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots. The effect of corneal thickness on both tonometers was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver variations for dynamic contour tonometer were assessed in 41 eyes of 41 patients. RESULTS: The mean difference+/-SD (95% limits of agreement) between NCT and DCT was -0.80+/-2.98 (-6.6 to 5.1) mm Hg (P=0.009) and no relation between NCT/DCT differences and average was found. The intraocular pressure readings obtained by noncontact tonometer depended on central corneal thickness (P<0.001, adjusted r(2)=0.301). However, dynamic contour tonometer readings showed no effect of corneal thickness (P=0.388, adjusted r(2)=-0.002). The coefficient of repeatability for DCT was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.96, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: In subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, NCT and DCT readings are not interchangeable. DCT measurements, unlike NCT measurements, did not depend on corneal thickness.     

Optic disk size in open-angle glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

PURPOSE: To compare optic disk size in eyes of subjects classified as normal with the eyes of subjects with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or pseudoexfoliation syndrome in an older population-based sample. METHODS: The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3,654 subjects. Vertical disk diameter was measured from stereoscopic disk photographs, and we used spherical equivalent refraction to correct for magnification. Analyses used all eyes in a general estimating equation model. RESULTS: Mean disk diameter was 1.556 mm in glaucomatous eyes, significantly different (P <.05) than normal eyes (1.506 mm) and eyes with ocular hypertension (1.494 mm) or pseudoexfoliation (1.501 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with glaucoma have slightly larger optic disks than nonglaucomatous subjects.     

Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness between eyes with congenital glaucoma and normal controls and to correlate this parameter with corneal diameter and axial length. METHODS: Eyes of consecutive children with congenital glaucoma with previous glaucoma surgery and eyes of children with inadequacy of lacrimal drainage system with age less than 3 years old were examined under inhalatory general anesthesia. Complete ophthalmologic examination, central corneal thickness, axial length, and corneal diameter measurements were performed. All patients presented with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 21 mm Hg and no clinical sign of corneal edema. RESULTS: Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients (30 congenital glaucoma and 25 controls) were examined (mean age = 16.6 +/- 10.6 months; 20 female/ 35 males). There was no significant difference in age and gender between glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Mean IOP was higher in glaucomatous eyes (P = 0.02). Corneal diameter and axial length between glaucomatous eyes and controls were significantly different (P < 0.0001 for both). Central corneal thickness was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes (P = 0.01). There was a significant correlation between corneal diameter and central corneal thickness and also between central corneal thickness and axial length (r2 = 0.32 and r2 = 0.18, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness was significantly thinner in children with congenital glaucoma. This finding may be another confounding factor when measuring IOP in those patients. Pachymetry should be considered during their examination.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range ? 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = ? 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = ? 0.106, p = 0.292). Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.     

Cataract surgery for congenital cataract: endothelial cell characteristics, corneal thickness, and impact on intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell characteristics, and intraocular pressure (IOP) are affected in patients with previous congenital cataract surgery and to focus on their clinical significance. METHODS: CCT and IOP measurements and specular microscopy were performed in 31 eyes of 17 cases of extracted congenital cataracts and 40 eyes of 20 age- and sex-matched participants as control group. The mean of three pachymetry measurements of the central cornea was taken as CCT. IOP was checked using an applanation tonometer. RESULTS: The mean corneal thickness of the eyes with extracted congenital cataract (632+/-45 microm) was significantly greater than that of the control eyes (546+/-33 microm; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the corneal endothelial cell count, coefficient of variation (CV), and mean cell area (AVG) of endothelial cells between operated eyes and the control group. The mean measured IOP in the operated group (22.8+/-3.3 mm Hg) was significantly greater than IOP in controls (14.1+/-1.8 mm Hg, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the corneas were clinically clear and there was no significant difference in endothelial characteristics of eyes with extracted congenital cataract and controls, central corneas of operated eyes were significantly thicker than those of controls. To differentiate the actual glaucoma from ocular hypertension in these patients, the central corneal thickness measurement should strongly be considered.     

Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic, chronic, primary angle-closure glaucoma, open-angle glaucoma, and controls

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical features and anatomic parameters in asymptomatic (creeping) and symptomatic, chronic, primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) as compared with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and with control subjects with normal eyes. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with each of the following four types of eyes were studied (N = 160): eyes with symptomatic PACG, eyes with asymptomatic PACG, eyes with OAG, and the eyes of age-, sex-, and refraction-matched control subjects. The refractive status, keratometry, pachymetry, corneal diameter, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, axial length, and relative lens position were noted. The groups were compared using a paired t test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Patients with asymptomatic chronic PACG were older than patients in the symptomatic group, were more often men, and were more likely to have either diabetes mellitus or hypertension. Symptomatic chronic PACG eyes were more hypermetropic. Asymptomatic eyes had more iridotrabecular synechiae and minimal pupillary ruff atrophy as compared with the symptomatic eyes that had largely iridocorneal synechiae and large areas where the ruff was absent. All other clinical and anatomic parameters were statistically similar in the two groups, but differed significantly from OAG and control eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular parameters of asymptomatic or creeping angle closure eyes show that these are significantly different from eyes having POAG. Asymptomatic and symptomatic chronic PACG eyes are structurally similar. Open-angle glaucoma eyes and normal eyes were comparable, but differed from both the chronic angle-closure glaucoma groups in having a larger corneal diameter, deeper anterior chamber, thinner lens, and a longer axial length. The symptomatic chronic PACG eyes showed more evidence of ischemic damage to the iris, and this could account for the symptoms reported by these patients.     

角膜生物参数对青光眼患者眼压测量影响的研究

目的:探讨角膜生物参数对青光眼患者眼压测量的影响。方法:对80例121眼青光眼患者进行眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)与Goldmann压平眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)测量,并用先进的OrbscanⅡ眼前节分析系统测量中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)。结果:平均矫正眼压(IOPcc)值17.41±5.62mmHg;平均GAT值15.76±6.06mmHg;IOPcc与角膜滞后性(cornealhysteresis,CH)有相关性(P=0.000;r=-0.236);IOPcc与GAT显著相关(P=0.000;r=0.857);IOPcc与CCT无相关性。结论:对已经诊断的青光眼患者,平均IOPcc值高于平均GAT值;随着CH的降低,IOPcc值有升高的趋势;且IOPcc值不受CCT值的影响。     

Iris colour, optic disc dimensions, degree and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether iris colour influences size and shape of the optic nerve head and risk for glaucoma progression. METHODS: The hospital-based observational study included 1973 eyes of 1012 Caucasian subjects with ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma. For all patients, colour stereo optic disc photographs were evaluated, and corneal pachymetry and achromatic perimetry were performed. Main outcome measures were optic nerve head parameters, the development or progression of visual field defects and iris colour. RESULTS: In most of the study groups, size of the optic disc, neuroretinal rim, alpha zone and beta zone of parapapillary atrophy, retinal vessel diameter and central corneal thickness did not differ significantly between eyes with blue, green, brown and mixed iris colour. In the normal-pressure glaucoma group, neuroretinal rim area was smallest in the population with mixed-coloured eyes and largest in the group of eyes with brown irides (P = 0.001 after correction for inter-eye dependency and multiple testing). For the ocular hypertensive subjects and glaucoma patients with follow-up examinations, the rate of development or progression of glaucomatous visual field loss was not significantly associated with iris colour (P = 0.060). CONCLUSIONS: In Caucasian subjects, iris colour does not have a major association with the size of the optic nerve head structures, central corneal thickness and retinal arterial diameter. In Caucasian patients with ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma, an influence of iris colour on the risk for development or progression of glaucomatous visual field defects could not be confirmed.     

Central corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare central corneal thickness between eyes with congenital glaucoma and normal fellow eyes in unilateral glaucoma or less affected fellow eyes in bilateral glaucoma. METHODS: Eyes of consecutive phakic children with congenital glaucoma and previous glaucoma surgery were examined under chloral hydrate. Complete ophthalmologic examination, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, and corneal diameter measurements were performed. Patients were included in the study if presented with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 21 mm Hg and no biomicroscopic signs of corneal edema. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in the study. The mean CCT in the more affected eye/glaucomatous eye was 522.3 +/- 65.2 microm and in the less affected eye/healthy eye was 579.7 +/- 44.5 microm. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0013). CONCLUSION: CCT was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes than in normal fellow eyes in phakic children with congenital glaucoma. This finding may be another confounding factor when measuring IOP in these patients.     

角膜中央厚度与原发性开角型青光眼视网膜神经纤维层厚度的关系

目的:研究原发性开角型青光眼患者的角膜中央厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)与开角型青光眼严重程度之间的关系。方法:对眼科门诊原发性开角型青光眼患者30例60眼分别进行视野,OCT检查中央角膜厚度及视神经纤维层厚度,并进行统计学分析。结果:研究组中开角型青光眼患者的平均中央角膜厚度为561.8±44.9(483～609)μm。根据同一患者双侧中央角膜厚度分组,组间视野平均缺损(MD),平均视神经层厚度(average retinal nerve fiber layer,Average RNFL)有显著性差异(P=0.034,P=0.012),CCT较薄组MD值及平均视神经层厚度均较低。CCT与MD,平均视网膜神经纤维层厚度正相关(P=0.043,P=0.006)。结论:中央角膜厚度与开角型青光眼视神经损伤有一定相关性。