Use of Ankle Dorsiflexion and the Dimeglio and Pirani Scores in Predicting Relapse of Clubfoot Treated With the Ponseti Method

Although Dimeglio and Pirani scores are frequently employed to rate the severities of clubfoot and to evaluate treatment outcomes, it is unclear if these scores predict relapse after treatment. Ankle dorsiflexion has been suggested in recent years to be a promising predictor of relapse. The aim of this study was to investigate ankle dorsiflexion and Dimeglio and Pirani scores in predicting the relapse of clubfoot after treatment with the Ponseti method. We included patients with clubfoot previously treated by the Ponseti method, and retrospectively analyzed their initial ankle dorsiflexion, Pirani and Dimeglio scores, number of castings, and the occurrence of relapse. We analyzed 218 feet of 176 infants with clubfoot who showed an incidence of relapse of 17.0% (30/176). The mean initial Pirani and Dimeglio scores of the feet showing recurrence were significantly higher than individuals with non-recurrence (p < .001 each). We observed a robust association between Pirani and Dimeglio scores and the recurrence of clubfoot at the last follow-up (γ = 0.53, p = .001). In contrast, ankle dorsiflexion was negatively correlated with recurrence of clubfoot (γ = -0.21, p = .001). Dimeglio scores significantly predicted the recurrence of clubfoot (p = .014). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis exhibited slightly better performance regarding the Dimeglio score relative to the Pirani score and ankle dorsiflexion in predicting recurrence. Ankle dorsiflexion and Pirani and Dimeglio scores were related to recurrence in patients with clubfoot. However, the Dimeglio score reflected superior accuracy in predicting the prognosis of clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method.     

Relapses in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol- a systematic analysis

PurposeThe analysis determined the relapses in clubfoot children treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol and their correlation with overall follow up duration using pooled data from various series. It also tested the prescribed timelines of 5 and 7 years for slow-down/cessation of relapses in clubfoot children.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed for articles published in “Pubmed (includes Medline indexed journals)” electronic databases using key words: “Clubfoot or CTEV or congenital talipes equinovarus”, “Ponseti” for years 1^st January 2001 to 15^th November 2020. Included were studies that addressed treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the standard Ponseti technique, followed a well defined brace protocol (maintenance of corrected deformity using a central bar based brace and prescribed duration mentioned), reported a minimum mean follow up of 4 years and having relapse as one of their outcome measure. Studies reporting Ponseti technique for non-idiopathic clubfoot, child's age older than 1 year at the time of primary treatment, clubfoot with previous interventions before Ponseti treatment, where relapse and residual deformities were not identified distinctly in follow up, abstract only publications, letter to the editors, case reports, technique papers and review articles were excluded. The following characteristics of clubfoot patients in the selected articles were included for analysis: Patient numbers/feet treated with Ponseti technique; follow up years (<5; 5-7 and >7 years; overall) and corresponding relapse percentages for patients.ResultsThere were total 2206 patients in the included 24 studies. Average follow up was 6 years. The average relapse rates for clubfoot patients in the pooled data stood at 30%. The overall relapse rates increased with a longer follow up and the curve befitted a linear regression equation with weak positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.08). The relapse rates in follow up categories of <5 years (26.6 ± 15.6%), 5-7 years (30.8 ± 16.3%) and >7 years (28.4 ± 6.2%) were similar statistically (Analysis of variance, ANOVA).ConclusionsApproximately 1 in 3 clubfoot patients suffer relapse post Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol. A weak positive correlation was observed for relapses when correlated with increasing follow up years. The relapses however tend to slow down after initial growth years. There is a need to educate the care receivers regarding the possibility of late relapses despite proper Ponseti treatment and accordingly to keep them under supervised follow up for longer periods.     

Is the Denis Browne Splint a Myth? A Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study in Clubfoot Management using Denis Browne Splint Versus Daily Exercise Protocol

The Ponseti technique is successful in idiopathic clubfoot management. However, the leading cause of relapse and recurrence is nonadherence to the Denis Brown bracing protocol. This necessitates more extensive soft tissue surgeries. Based on a detailed up-to-date search, we have found that no other studies provide such a modified Ponseti technique. This study is unique, as it depends on using specific stretching exercises instead of bracing during management. Between August 2009 and June 2019, a consecutive series of 194 isolated idiopathic clubfoot patients (251 feet) were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 93 months (range 72 to 146), mean 91.8 months. All patients underwent a clinical and functional assessment using the Laaveg-Ponseti score and radiological assessments. There were 132 boys (68.1%) and 62 girls (31.9%), a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. The mean age at initiation of treatment was 14.9 days. According to the Laaveg-Ponseti score, 51.7% yielded excellent results, 35.3% yielded good results, 11.55% yielded fair results, and 1.59% yielded poor results. Bracing noncompliance has been identified as a major cause for treatment failure. This presented exercise protocol not only eliminates the need for bracing and reduces the cost for the affected individuals but also provides excellent clinical and radiographic end results, comparable to the original treatment protocol using the Denis Brown brace.     

Outcome of Atypical & Complex Clubfoot Managed by Modified Ponseti Method—A Prospective Study

Atypical or complex clubfoot constitutes a small number of cases. Due to the difference in complexity of anatomy, standard deformity correction by Ponseti is not effective. Hence a modified Ponseti method was advised which focuses on deformity differences for treatment. We conducted a prospective study to analyze the outcome in atypical or complex clubfoot treated with the modified Ponseti method. All the children of age less than 1 year were included in the study with atypical or complex clubfoot. Every case was treated according to the modified Ponseti method and tenotomy. Pirani scores were measured at pretreatment, each visit, before application of a brace, and at the latest follow-up. Statistical analysis of all continuous and categorical variables was done. A total of 30 patients (47 feet) were included in the study. Mean Pirani score improved from 5.69 at presentation to 0.45 at time of brace application and latest follow-up 0.34 (p < .001). Six patients (9 feet) had a relapse which was managed with recasting. The mean Pirani score of relapse was 0.72, which after correction reduced to 0.11 (p = .008). Six patients had cast-related complications which were managed with conservative treatment. With an increase in popularity of the Ponseti method, a greater number of complex clubfoot cases are seen due to inadequate reduction or slippage of cast or improper cast application techniques. All these need to be identified at an early age. This helps in proper treatment and improves the quality of life as well as foot appearance.     

A method for the early evaluation of the Ponseti (Iowa) technique for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot

The Ponseti casting technique is reported to have a high success rate in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Non-operative treatment of clubfoot provides a lower complication rate, less pain, and higher function as the patient ages than operative treatment. To demonstrate serial post-treatment change in clubfeet over time, three clubfoot rating systems were utilized in the current study. Patients compliant with the Ponseti technique and treated before the age of 7 months, had a 92% success rate at an early follow-up after casting was completed. It is not the purpose of this article to analyze the long-term clubfoot treatment result but to establish tools which can be used to judge initial success with the Ponseti technique. Complications are few and minor, limited to equipment used and cast technique.     

Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative treatment of idiopathic clubfoot has become increasingly accepted worldwide as the initial standard of care. The Ponseti method has become particularly popular as a result of published short and long-term success rates in North America. The purpose of the current study was to examine the early rate of clubfoot recurrence following the use of the Ponseti treatment method in a New Zealand population and to analyze patient characteristics to identify factors predictive of recurrence. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive babies with a total of seventy-three clubfeet treated by the Ponseti technique were followed prospectively for a minimum of two years from the start of treatment. Recurrence, defined as the need for any subsequent operative treatment, was analyzed with respect to the severity at presentation, the time of presentation, the number of casts needed to obtain the initial correction, any family history of clubfoot, ethnicity, and the compliance with postcorrection abduction bracing. Recurrence was classified as minor, defined as requiring a tendon transfer or an Achilles tendon lengthening, or major, defined as requiring a full posterior or posteromedial surgical release to achieve a corrected plantigrade foot. RESULTS: Twenty-one (41%) of the fifty-one patients had a recurrence, which was major in twelve of them and minor in nine. The parents of twenty-six babies (51%) complied with the abduction bracing protocol, and only three of these children had a major recurrence. Compliance with abduction bracing was associated with the greatest risk reduction for recurrence (odds ratio, 0.2; p = 0.009). When the parents had not complied with the bracing protocol, the patient had a five times greater chance of having a recurrence. With the numbers studied, no significant relationships were found between recurrence and the severity at presentation, the time of presentation, the number of casts needed to obtain correction, ethnicity, or a family history of clubfoot. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the postcorrection abduction bracing protocol is crucial to avoid recurrence of a clubfoot deformity treated with the Ponseti method. When the parents comply with the bracing protocol, the Ponseti method is very effective at maintaining a correction, although minor recurrences are still common. When the parents do not comply with the bracing protocol, many major and minor recurrences should be expected.     

Foot abduction brace in the Ponseti method for idiopathic clubfoot deformity: torsional deformities and compliance

The Ponseti method has shown to be effective in treating idiopathic clubfoot deformity. Application of a foot abduction brace is crucial to long term outcome. Compliance and possible effect on femoral anteversion and tibial torsion were assessed in 20 children with an average bracing period of 33 months. Nineteen patients were compliant with the bracing protocol and highly satisfied with the treatment protocol. Ultrasound measurement of femoral anteversion (40.5 degrees) and tibial external torsion (38.4 degrees) of the affected side were within the normal range. Range of motion of the ankle joint in all clubfeet resulted in an average dorsiflexion of 27.5 degrees. Among our patient group, the method proved to be highly accepted by almost all families, with excellent functional results. Application of the foot abduction brace did not result in pathological changes of femoral anteversion or tibial torsion.     

The influence of brace type on the success rate of the Ponseti treatment protocol for idiopathic clubfoot

Purpose  

The success of the Ponseti method for treating idiopathic clubfoot deformity is dependent on the casting techniques and the adherence of the patient to the foot abduction brace protocol. Newly developed brace designs claim to be more comfortable, to be easier to use and to prevent dislodgement of the foot from the brace, making them more efficient and improving patient compliance. They are, however, more costly, and, therefore, accessible to fewer patients. We compared the compliance and treatment outcome using two brace designs, the traditional simple brace of pre-walking shoes attached to a Dennis Browne (DB) bar and the new sophisticated Mitchell brace.     

Ponseti Idiopathic and Nonidiopathic Clubfoot Correction With Secondary Surgeries

The Ponseti method has revolutionized clubfoot treatment for not only idiopathic clubfoot but also non-idiopathic clubfoot. This study aimed to validate the existing literature with respect to the Ponseti method serving as first line treatment for clubfoot. The purpose of this study was to compare clubfoot type and recurrence with secondary surgical procedures following Ponseti method. Kaiser Permanente Northern California database was queried to identify clubfoot children under 3 years old with a consecutive 3-year membership. Associated comorbidities and operative procedure codes were identified. Chart review was performed on all surgical clubfoot patients who completed Ponseti method. Patients’ average age at time of surgery, frequency of surgeries, and types of procedures performed were recorded. A logistic regression analysis assessed the adjusted association between surgery status and clubfoot type. Clubfoot incidence was about 1 in 1000 live births. Of the 375 clubfoot children, 334 (89%) were idiopathic and 41 (11%) were non-idiopathic. In the total study population, 82% (n = 309) patients maintained Ponseti correction without a secondary surgery; 66 patients (18%) underwent subsequent secondary surgeries. The non-idiopathic clubfoot underwent surgery more frequently compared to idiopathic clubfoot patients (41.5% vs 14.7%, respectively, p = .0001). Non-idiopathic clubfoot children underwent surgery at a younger age. This study validates the Ponseti method is the first line treatment for clubfoot correction despite etiology. However, patients with recurrent clubfoot may require secondary surgery following Ponseti method. Clubfoot recurrence surveillance is key for identifying early symptomatic recurrence in order to minimize foot rigidity and the need for osseous procedures.     

Late recurrence of clubfoot deformity: a 45-year followup

Idiopathic clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities. Regardless of the mode of treatment, clubfoot has a tendency to relapse until the age of 5 years. Relapses are rare in patients after 5 years of age. A 45-year followup of a patient with idiopathic clubfoot treated as a newborn with the Ponseti method is reported. The patient had both clubfeet well-corrected as seen clinically and radiographically with this method. However, recurrent deformities developed bilaterally when the patient was 8 years old. Because of the late recurrence of this deformity, the patient had a thorough neurologic evaluation, which was normal. Treating physicians should be aware of the possibility of late recurrence in patients who have had complete correction of their clubfoot deformity.     

The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations

The Ponseti method has become the gold standard of care for the treatment of congenital club foot. Despite numerous articles in MEDLINE reporting results from around the globe there are still crucial details of the Ponseti method which seem to be less commonly known or considered. The Ponseti method is not only a detailed method of manipulation and casting but also of preventing and treating relapse. Recommendations on how to correct complex club foot have resulted in an almost 100 % initial correction rate. The foot abduction brace is crucial for preventing relapse and is still a challenge for families and sometimes doctors alike. Experience and knowledge on how to support the parents, how to set and apply the brace in the best possible way and how to solve problems that can be encountered during the bracing period are essential to ensure compliance. Regular follow-up visits are necessary to be able to detect early signs of recurrence and prevent full relapse by enforcing abduction bracing, recasting or performing tibialis anterior tendon transfer. Recent midterm outcome studies have shown that by following the Ponseti treatment regime in all aspects it is possible to prevent open joint surgery in almost all cases. The body of literature of the last decade has evaluated many steps and aspects of the Ponseti method and gives valuable answers to questions encountered in daily practice. This review of the current literature and recommendations on the different aspects of the Ponseti method aims to promote understanding of the treatment regime and its’ details.     

Good results with the Ponseti method: a multicenter study of 162 clubfeet followed for 2-5 years

Background and purpose

In 2002–2003, several hospitals in Norway introduced the Ponseti method for treating clubfoot. The present multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the initial results of this method, and to compare them to the good results reported in the literature.

Patients and methods

116 children with 162 congenital idiopathic clubfeet who were born between 2004 and 2006 were treated with the Ponseti method at 8 hospitals in Norway. All children were prospectively registered at birth, and 116 feet were assessed according to Pirani before treatment was started. 63% used a standard bilateral foot abduction brace, and 32% used a unilateral above-the-knee brace. One of the authors examined all feet at a mean age of 4 years. At follow-up, all feet were assessed by Pirani’s scoring system, and range of motion of the foot and ankle was measured.

Results

At follow-up, 77% of the feet had a Pirani score of 0.5 or better, good dorsiflexion and external rotation, and no forefoot adduction. An Achilles tenotomy had been performed in 79% of the feet. Compliance to any brace was good; only 7% were defined as non-compliant. Extensive soft tissue release had been performed in 3% of the feet.We found no statistically significant differences between the two braces, except a tendency of better Pirani score in the group using the bilateral foot abduction brace, and a tendency of better compliance in patients using the unilateral brace. Better Pirani scores were found in children who were treated at the largest hospitals.

Interpretation

After introducing the Ponseti method in Norway, the clinical outcome was good and in accordance with the reports from single centers. Only 5 feet needed extensive surgery during the first 4 years of life.The methods of treating clubfoot have varied over the years and between the different hospitals in Norway. The results reported have not been satisfactory, as 75% of the feet needed posterior or postero-medial release (Nesse et al. 1996). Thus, orthopedic surgeons treating clubfoot in Norway decided to start with the Ponseti method, which has shown promising short-term and long-term results (Laaveg and Ponseti 1980, Cooper and Dietz 1995, Herzenberg et al. 2002). The Ponseti method of treating clubfoot was introduced at several hospitals in Norway in 2002 and 2003.A foot abduction brace is a crucial part of the Ponseti treatment, and it is well documented that the brace prevents a clubfoot from relapsing (Dobbs et al. 2004, Morcuende et al. 2004). The brace recommended by Ponseti is a bilateral foot abduction brace. Many hospitals in Norway have traditionally used a custom-made unilateral above-the-knee dynamic brace to prevent relapse. Some of these hospitals continued to offer this brace to children with clubfoot, even after the introduction of the Ponseti casting method.Norway is a small country regarding population (4.9 million inhabitants), but it has a relatively large area and none of the hospitals were responsible for treating more than 10 newborns with clubfoot every year in this study.We evaluated our results and compared them to the good short-term and long-term results reported in the literature. We also compared the unilateral above-the-knee brace with the standard bilateral foot abduction brace regarding both clinical outcome and compliance to brace use. Finally, we determined whether the results were influenced by the number of clubfeet treated at each hospital.     

Quality of life of clubfoot patients during the brace period of the Ponseti method

PurposeQuantifying the quality of life in clubfoot patients during bracing following the Ponseti method compared with healthy controls.MethodsData collected during the brace period of the Ponseti method and of a reference sample was retrospectively analyzed to investigate health-related quality of life scale (TAPQOL) in clubfoot patients compared with healthy controls. The TAPQOL instrument consists of 12 subscales comprising the 4 domains of health-related quality of life namely physical, social, emotional and cognitive functioning.ResultsResponses of 80 parents of clubfoot patients and 238 parents of healthy controls were analyzed. On average both study groups scored high on the 4 domains of the TAPQOL instrument. The clubfoot group scored significantly (p < 0.0125) lower on the subscales motor functioning, sleep, lung and skin problems during bracing. No difference was observed between the study groups in the year the bracing had ended.ConclusionDutch clubfoot patients show an overall good health related quality of life. However, during the brace phase of the Ponseti treatment they score lower in subscales in the physical functioning domain. These results can be used in the counselling of parent and might alleviate some concerns that parents have about the bracing period.Level of evidenceLevel III, Case control study.     

Comparative results of the conservative treatment in clubfoot by two different protocols

The current study aims at presenting the results of the two methods of conservative treatment in clubfoot: the Romanian traditional method and the Ponseti method. The study population included 103 children (148 clubfeet) treated in our department between 1998 and 2005. Between 1998 and 2003, the conservative treatment protocol was based upon the Romanian method. The Ponseti method has been used since 2004. The main criterion for the assessment of the efficiency of the two conservative methods in clubfoot is the number of feet requiring surgical treatment - posteromedial release at 18 months. This criterion is clearly in favor of the Ponseti method: four feet (5%) needed posteromedial release in Ponseti group patients versus 13 feet (18%) in Romanian group patients (P=0.0193). The Ponseti method is safe, efficient in the conservative treatment of clubfoot and decreases the number of surgical interventions needed for the correction of the deformation compared with our traditional method.     

A new dynamic foot abduction orthosis for clubfoot treatment

Recurrent clubfoot deformity after successful initial correction with the use of the Ponseti method continues to be a common problem and is often caused by noncompliance with wear of the traditional foot abduction brace. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of a newly designed dynamic foot abduction orthosis in terms of (1) parental compliance and (2) effectiveness in preventing recurrent clubfoot deformities. Twenty-eight patients (49 clubfeet) who were treated with a dynamic foot abduction orthosis in accordance with the Ponseti method were included in this study. Of the 28 patients, 18 had idiopathic clubfeet (31 clubfeet), 2 had complex idiopathic clubfeet (4 clubfeet), 5 had myelodysplasia (8 clubfeet), and 3 were syndromic (6 clubfeet). The mean duration of follow-up was 29 months (range, 24-36 months). Noncompliance was reported in only 2 (7.1%) of the 28 patients in the new orthosis compared with the authors' previously reported 41% (21/51) noncompliance rate in patients treated with the use of the traditional foot abduction brace. The two patients in this study, in which parents were noncompliant with orthosis wear, developed recurrent deformities. There were 2 patients (7%) who experienced skin blistering in the new orthosis compared with 12 (23.5%) of 51 patients who experienced blistering with the use of traditional abduction brace in the authors' previously reported study. Logistic regression modeling compliance and recurrence revealed that noncompliance with the foot abduction orthosis was most predictive of recurrence of deformity (odds ratio, 27; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-326; P = 0.01). The articulating foot abduction orthosis is well tolerated by patients and parents and results in a higher compliance rate and a lower complication rate than what were observed with the traditional foot abduction orthosis.     

Treatment of the exposed knee prosthesis

Background and purpose — There are still controversies as to the age for beginning treatment with the Ponseti method. We evaluated the clinical outcome with different age at onset of Ponseti management for clubfoot.

Patients and methods — 90 included children were divided into 3 groups in terms of age at start of treatment. The difference in treatment-related and prognosis-related variables including presentation age, initial Pirani and Dimeglio score, casts required, relapse rates, final Dimeglio score, and international clubfoot study group score (ICFSG) was analyzed.

Results — Age between 28 days and 3 months at start of treatment method was associated with fewer casts required, lower relapse rate, and lower final ICFSG score (p < 0.05). Early treatment before 28 days of age required more casts and had a higher relapse rate (p < 0.05). The highest ICFSG scores were found in the ages between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, age between 28 days and 3 months was demonstrated to have a lower finial ICFSG score. Linear regression models showed that presentation age was positively correlated with final ICFSG score, and was identified as the only independent prognostic risk factor.

Interpretation — There was lower rate of relapse and better clinical outcome when treatment was initiated at age between 28 days and 3 months. With the Ponseti method, clubfeet may not need urgent treatment.     

Comparison of cast materials for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

The Ponseti method of congenital idiopathic clubfoot correction has traditionally specified plaster of Paris (POP) as the cast material of choice; however, there are negative aspects to using POP. We sought to determine the influence of cast material (POP v. semirigid fibreglass [SRF]) on clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.

Methods

Patients were randomized to POP or SRF before undergoing the Ponseti method. The primary outcome measure was the number of casts required for clubfoot correction. Secondary outcome measures included the number of casts by severity, ease of cast removal, need for Achilles tenotomy, brace compliance, deformity relapse, need for repeat casting and need for ancillary surgical procedures.

Results

We enrolled 30 patients: 12 randomized to POP and 18 to SRF. There was no difference in the number of casts required for clubfoot correction between the groups (p = 0.13). According to parents, removal of POP was more difficult (p < 0.001), more time consuming (p < 0.001) and required more than 1 method (p < 0.001). At a final follow-up of 30.8 months, the mean times to deformity relapse requiring repeat casting, surgery or both were 18.7 and 16.4 months for the SRF and POP groups, respectively.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the number of casts required for correction of clubfoot between the 2 materials, but SRF resulted in a more favourable parental experience, which cannot be ignored as it may have a positive impact on psychological well-being despite the increased cost associated.     

Improved bracing compliance in children with clubfeet using a dynamic orthosis

Purpose  Non-compliance with foot abduction bracing in children with clubfeet treated with the Ponseti method is the leading risk factor for deformity recurrence. A dynamic foot abduction orthosis is believed to result in improved compliance, fewer skin complications, and fewer recurrences. A case–control trial was conducted to test this hypothesis. Methods  A prospective cohort of children with idiopathic clubfoot using a dynamic brace was compared to a historical control group treated with a standard orthosis. Compliance, skin complications, recurrence, and the need for surgical soft tissue release were compared between groups at equivalent follow-up. Results  The dynamic and standard brace groups are equivalent in age at the start of treatment (1.9 vs. 2.9 months), number of affected feet (97 vs. 92), and severity (average of four casts required for correction in each group). Fifty-seven children were followed in each group for an average of 2 years. All were corrected initially with the Ponseti method. Compliance is higher using the dynamic brace (47/57, 81%) compared to the standard brace (21/57, 47%) (P < 0.001). The recurrence rate is lower using the dynamic brace (11/57, 19%) compared to the standard brace (22/57, 39%) (P < 0.02). Skin complications are fewer in the dynamic brace (2/57, 3%) compared to the standard brace (11/57, 19%) (P < 0.008). Most importantly, five children using the standard brace underwent posteromedial release within 2 years of treatment, compared to none in the dynamic brace group. Conclusion  The dynamic foot abduction brace results in improved compliance, fewer recurrences, fewer skin complications, and reduced rates of surgery in idiopathic clubfoot than the traditional brace after non-operative correction with the Ponseti method.