Blood pressure control assessed by home, ambulatory and conventional blood pressure measurements in the Japanese general population: the Ohasama study.

To assess blood pressure control in the Japanese population, we analyzed previously obtained measurements of conventional, home and ambulatory blood pressures in 1,174 subjects aged > or =40 in a Japanese community. On the basis of conventional blood pressure values and the use of antihypertensive medication, participants were classified as normotensive, untreated hypertensive and treated hypertensive subjects. When 140/90, 135/85 and 135/85 mmHg were used as the hypertension criteria for conventional, home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, respectively, all three blood pressure values were higher in untreated and treated hypertensive subjects than in normotensive subjects. Among the treated hypertensive subjects, approximately half were classified as hypertensive not only by conventional blood pressure, but also by home or ambulatory measurements. Approximately 10% of the subjects defined as normotensive by conventional blood pressure measurement were classified as hypertensive by home or ambulatory measurements, whereas 60% of the untreated hypertensive subjects as defined by conventional blood pressure measurement had normal home or ambulatory blood pressure values. Therefore, we concluded that 1) the poor blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects was attributable not only to the white coat effect but also to inadequate control of blood pressure; and 2) a certain percentage of subjects were misclassified as hypertensive or normotensive by conventional blood pressure measurement.     

Blood pressure normalization is associated with normal left ventricular mass but not carotid geometry: the ICARe Dicomano Study

OBJECTIVE: While many studies have examined the relation between antihypertensive treatment and ventricular hypertrophy, relatively few data are available regarding changes in arterial structure due to blood pressure reduction. Therefore, we compared normotensive to untreated hypertensive subjects to uncontrolled (treated with elevated blood pressure values) or controlled (treated with normal blood pressure values) hypertensive older subjects. PATIENTS: Community-dwellers (age >or= 65 years) of a small town in Italy (Dicomano) underwent extensive clinical examination, echocardiography, carotid ultrasonography, and applanation tonometry. Of the 614 participants, 173 subjects were normotensive; among the hypertensive subjects, 225 were untreated (51%), 177 (40%) were uncontrolled, and only 39 (9%) were controlled. RESULTS: The majority of treated hypertensive subjects were on monotherapy (82%). Subjects with a history of coronary artery disease or stroke were more frequently treated. Controlled hypertensives had left ventricular mass index similar to normotensives but lower than uncontrolled and untreated hypertensives. There were no differences among the three hypertensive groups in carotid artery structure. Only the pressure-independent stiffness index was reduced in the treated hypertensive subjects compared to untreated hypertensives, with no difference between controlled and uncontrolled subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In our community-based, older population, antihypertensive treatment was associated with a normal left ventricular mass only when blood pressure was well controlled. In contrast, carotid artery remodeling and atherosclerosis were independent of antihypertensive treatment as well as of achievement of satisfactory blood pressure control. However, antihypertensive treatment was associated with significantly higher carotid compliance even in the absence of detectable changes in carotid structure.     

Prevalence and clinical significance of a greater ambulatory versus office blood pressure ('reversed white coat' condition) in a general population

BACKGROUND: Attention has recently been directed to a condition termed 'reversed white coat' because of an average 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) uncharacteristically greater than office BP. No data are available, however, on the prevalence of this condition in the general population, as well as on its relationship to BP, age, gender, antihypertensive treatment and cardiac organ damage. METHODS: In 3200 individuals (participation rate 64%), randomly selected to be representative of the residents of Monza (Milan, Italy) for sex and decades of age (25 to 74 years), we measured office BP (average of three measurements, sphygmomanometry), ambulatory BP (automatic readings every 20 min, Spacelabs 90207) and left ventricular mass (echocardiography). RESULTS: A 'reversed white coat' condition (identified when 24-h average ambulatory systolic, diastolic or mean were higher than the corresponding office values) was seen in 15% (diastolic) to 26% (systolic) of the population as a whole. Prevalence was greater (34-40%) when the difference between office and daytime BP was considered but in both instances it remained less than the prevalence of the white-coat phenomenon. A reversed white-coat condition was similarly frequent in males and females and showed a steep reduction with age and increasing office BP values. Prevalence was greater in hypertensive subjects in whom treatment achieved BP control than in untreated or unsatisfactorily treated individuals. Within each quartile of 24-h or office BP, left ventricular mass index adjusted for demographic and biochemical values was similar in reversed white coat versus the remaining subjects. The absence of any association with left ventricular hypertrophy scores against the clinical significance of this phenomenon.     

White coat effect in treated and untreated patients with high office blood pressure. Relationship with pulse wave velocity and left ventricular mass index.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in hypertensive patients whether the white coat effect is associated with target-organ damage and whether it is modified by anti-hypertensive therapy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we evaluated blood pressure (BP) measured in the office and by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of aortic stiffness, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in 88 subjects (aged 49 +/- 2 years) with white-coat hypertension (WCH, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP < 130/84 mmHg), 31 under antihypertensive therapy, 57 untreated, and in 115 patients with office and ambulatory hypertension (HT, aged 51 +/- 2 years, office BP > 140/90, daytime BP > 135/85), 65 under antihypertensive therapy, 50 untreated. In a longitudinal study in 15 patients with HT and in 11 patients with WCH we evaluated the influence of antihypertensive therapy (> 6 months) on office and ambulatory BP and on PWV. RESULTS: The intensity of the white coat effect (office BP-daytime BP) was greater in WCH than in HT. Taking all subjects, the white coat effect did not correlate with PWV (r = 0.08, ns) or with LVMI (r = 0.01, ns), whereas daytime BP correlated significantly with PWV (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and with LVMI (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). WCH subjects showed lower PWV and LVMI than HT subjects. Treated and untreated WCH, with similar office and daytime BP, showed similar values of PWV and LVMI. Treated and untreated HT showed similar office BP values but treated HT showed lower daytime BP and PWV values. In the longitudinal study, antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced daytime BP and PWV values in the 15 HTs, whereas in the 11 WCH it did not alter daytime BP or PWV values. CONCLUSIONS: 1. In both WCH and HT (treated and untreated) the intensity of the white coat effect does not reflect either the severity of hypertension measured by target organ damage or the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment. 2. In WCH antihypertensive therapy does not improve either ambulatory BP values or damage to target organs.     

Isolated office hypertension: a 3-year follow-up study

The study aimed to evaluate, over a 3-year period, the progression towards sustained hypertension and left ventricular (LV) changes in patients with isolated office (IO) hypertension (office BP>140 and/or 90 mmHg, daytime BP<130/80 mmHg). After 3 years from the basal evaluation, 38 subjects with basal normal BP and 42 subjects with basal IO hypertension underwent a second 24-h BP monitoring and echocardiography; 19 patients of the basal IO hypertension group were not revaluated because they had already developed ambulatory hypertension and were on antihypertensive treatment. At the second evaluation, the 38 normotensive subjects had unchanged BP and LV parameters; 25 IO hypertensives have developed sustained hypertension. Considering them together with the 19 patients already treated, 72% of 61 IO hypertensives developed ambulatory hypertension over a 3-year period. The patients who subsequently developed hypertension differed from the group who did not only for lower basal values of LV diastolic parameters; all the patients with basal LV hypertrophy and/or preclinical diastolic impairment subsequently developed sustained hypertension. In conclusion, IO hypertensive patients show a high rate of progression towards sustained hypertension. Basal LV hypertrophy and/or preclinical diastolic dysfunction were the only markers of a greater risk of becoming hypertensives.     

Assessment of the daily blood pressure load as a determinant of cardiac function in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

The distribution of blood pressure (BP) values over the day and night was assessed in a group of 30 never previously treated patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension via 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Elevated BP values during the awake hours (greater than 140/90 mm Hg) and sleeping hours (greater than 120/80 mm Hg) were used to calculate the total percentage of abnormal BP values (load) in each patient. The relationship between BP load and several indexes of hypertensive cardiac target organ involvement was compared to the relationships among office (casual), 24-hour average BP values, and cardiac indexes. Casual systolic and diastolic BP values did not correlate with left ventricular mass index, left atrial index, or peak left ventricular filling rate. Both 24-hour average BP and systolic and diastolic BP loads correlated with all indexes of cardiac target organ involvement. The BP loads were related to left ventricular mass index and left atrial index more strongly than were the mean 24-hour BP values; however, they were equally correlated for peak left ventricular filling rate. If greater than 40% of the ambulatory BP values were elevated, the likelihood of increased mass or decreased filling was greater than 61%, whereas if less than 40% of the BP values were elevated, the incidence of an abnormal cardiac test result decreased to less than 17%. These data show that the percentage of elevated BP values that includes both the awake and asleep periods is predictive of cardiac target organ involvement in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Patients with mild hypertension who have more than 40% abnormal BP values should strongly be considered for antihypertensive therapy.     

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of filling and emptying parameters and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in normotensives and hypertensives.

To evaluate the relationship between office and ambulatory BP measurements and filling and emptying parameters, 15 hypertensive and 15 control subjects underwent both 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and Doppler echocardiography. No patient received antihypertensive medication for 3-4 weeks, had echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (greater than or equal to 12 mm) or a diastolic BP greater than 100 mm Hg. The time from R wave on the electrocardiogram to onset of ejection was prolonged in hypertensives (P less than 0.05). There were no differences between the hypertensives and normotensives for diastolic filling abnormalities. Finally, neither office nor ambulatory BP correlated with either Doppler filling or emptying parameters.     

Systolic vs diastolic blood pressure control in the hypertensive patients of the PAMELA population. Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that in the treated fraction of the hypertensive population, blood pressure (BP) control is less common for systolic BP (SBP) than for diastolic BP (DBP) as measured in the physician's office. Whether this phenomenon is artifactually attributable to a temporary increase in BP owing to a "white-coat" effect or represents a true rarity of SBP control in daily life is unknown. METHODS: Data were obtained from the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni) study population, which involved individuals ranging in age from 25 to 74 years who were representative of the residents of Monza (a city near Milan, Italy) and who were stratified according to sex. Office (an average of 3 sphygmomanometric measurements), home (an average of morning and evening self-measurements using a semiautomatic device), and 24-hour ambulatory (average of measurements performed every 20 minutes during the day and at night) BP values were obtained in all study subjects. In the treated hypertensive patients, BP was regarded as controlled if office values were less than 140 (SBP) or 90 (DBP) mm Hg. Home and 24-hour average SBP and DBP were regarded as controlled if the values were lower than 132/83 and 125/79 mm Hg, respectively. RESULTS: In the study participants (n = 2051), the number of patients with hypertension who were receiving antihypertensive treatment was 398, or approximately 42% of all individuals with hypertension. In-office SBP control by treatment was less frequent than DBP control (29.9% vs 41.5%, P<.05). This was also the case when home and 24-hour SBP and DBP control was considered (38.3% vs 54.6% and 50.8 vs 64.9%, respectively, P<.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In the PAMELA population, SBP control by treatment was much less frequent than DBP control by treatment. This was the case not only for office BP values but also for home and 24-hour BP values, demonstrating that inadequate SBP control is not limited to artificial BP-measuring methods but occurs in daily life.     

Ambulatory Monitoring in the Evaluation of Blood Pressure in Patients with Borderline Hypertension and the Role of the Defense Reflex

The differences between blood pressure (BP) readings taken in the clinic and during normal daily activities were assessed in two studies using a noninvasive ambulatory BP monitor (Avionics). In the first study 30 untreated hypertensive patients (17 with borderline pressures, average diastolic 95, and 13 established hypertensives, diastolics above 95) and 5 normotensive subjects had 30 readings taken in the physician's office and 30 while at home. Conventional sphygmomanometer BPs were also recorded in the office. In the borderline group home BPs were significantly lower than clinic BPs, whereas this difference was less marked for the established and normotensive group.

In the second study BP was measured every 15 minutes for 24 hours in 25 normal subjects, 25 borderline and 25 established hypertensives, and readings categorized according to four recording situations: physician's office, work, at home, and sleep. BPs in all groups were highest at work and lowest asleep, and directional changes were similar. Both hypertensive groups showed higher BPs in the physician's office than at home, while normal subjects showed no difference. BPs recorded in the physician's office were good predictors of 24 hour average BP in normal and established hypertensive subjects, but not in the borderline group: in such patients 24 hour monitoring may be of particular value in evaluating the need for treatment.     

Population-derived comparisons of ambulatory and office blood pressures. Implications for the determination of usual blood pressure and the concept of white coat hypertension.

BACKGROUND--Ambulatory blood pressures (BPs) have generally been reported to be lower than office blood pressures, but population-based data are lacking. METHODS--To better characterize ambulatory and office BP relationships, we explored the interrelationships of BPs measured in the office by mercury sphygmomanometry, 24-hour ambulatory BP measured with a portable device, and echocardiographic left ventricular mass in a random sample of 50 men aged 51 to 72 years drawn from a much larger pool. Office BP was based on the mean of 10 measurements performed over five visits. RESULTS--Among all participants, mean 24-hour ambulatory and mean office BPs were highly correlated: r (systolic/diastolic) = .90/.79; and both mean 24-hour and mean awake ambulatory BPs were significantly higher than mean office BPs. For the subsample not receiving antihypertensive therapy, mean ambulatory and office BPs were similar in terms of their associations with Penn left ventricular mass index (LVMI). No association between BP and left ventricular mass was observed among the subjects receiving antihypertensive medication. CONCLUSIONS--We conclude that a single session of 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring is unlikely to improve the determination of usual BP in older white men beyond that achievable with BP carefully measured over five separate office visits; and that white coat hypertension is rare in this population.     

INSUFFICIENT DURATION OF ACTION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS MEDIATES HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IN THE MORNINGIN HYPERTENSIVE POPULATION:THE OHASAMA STUDY

Blood pressure (BP) usually peaks in the morning. The circadian variation of the onset of cardiovascular disease mimics this circadian BP variation. To examine the determinants of the BP difference between the self-recorded BP in the morning (home BP) and daytime average ambulatory BP a cross sectional study was done in the general population of Ohasama, Japan. 1207 subjects ≥20 years measured both home (more than 14 times) and ambulatory BPs (326 treated for hypertension and 881 untreated subjects). The prevalence of subjects with the systolic BP difference (home BP in the morning?daytime ambulatory BP) of ≥10?mmHg (high morning BP) was 5.6% in untreated normotensives, 2.9% in untreated hypertensives, and 25.8% in treated hypertensives. This trend was also observed for diastolic pressure. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that age, male sex, and use of antihypertensive drugs were positively associated and day-night difference of BP was negatively associated with the high morning BP, respectively. These results suggest an insufficient duration of antihypertensive action of widely used antihypertensive drugs in Japan from the 1980s to 1990s. The amplitude of the day-night difference of ambulatory BP in subjects with a high morning BP was lower (non-dipping) than that without high morning BP. The high morning BP is not necessarily accompanied by hypertension but might be mediated, at least in part, by an insufficient duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. The high morning BP accompanies so-called non-dipper pattern of circadian BP variation. An insufficient duration of action of drugs may partly mediate non-dipping in subjects with antihypertensive medication.     

Insufficient duration of action of antihypertensive drugs mediates high blood pressure in the morning in hypertensive population: the Ohasama study

Blood pressure (BP) usually peaks in the morning. The circadian variation of the onset of cardiovascular disease mimics this circadian BP variation. To examine the determinants of the BP difference between the self-recorded BP in the morning (home BP) and daytime average ambulatory BP a cross sectional study was done in the general population of Ohasama, Japan. 1207 subjects > or = 20 years measured both home (more than 14 times) and ambulatory BPs (326 treated for hypertension and 881 untreated subjects), The prevalence of subjects with the systolic BP difference (home BP in the morning - daytime ambulatory BP) of > or = 10 mmHg (high morning BP) was 5.6% in untreated normotensives, 2.9% in untreated hypertensives, and 25.8% in treated hypertensives. This trend was also observed for diastolic pressure. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that age, male sex, and use of antihypertensive drugs were positively associated and day-night difference of BP was negatively associated with the high morning BP, respectively. These results suggest an insufficient duration of antihypertensive action of widely used antihypertensive drugs in Japan from the 1980s to 1990s. The amplitude of the day-night difference of ambulatory BP in subjects with a high morning BP was lower (non-dipping) than that without high morning BP. The high morning BP is not necessarily accompanied by hypertension but might be mediated, at least in part, by an insufficient duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. The high morning BP accompanies so-called non-dipper pattern of circadian BP variation. An insufficient duration of action of drugs may partly mediate non-dipping in subjects with antihypertensive medication.     

Silent cerebrovascular disease in the elderly. Correlation with ambulatory pressure

Does the average daily blood pressure correlate with hypertensive cerebrovascular disease better than the casual pressure, as has been reported in other target organ involvement? We investigated the associations of two abnormal findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging suggestive of a vascular etiology, low intense foci (lacunae), and periventricular hyperintense lesions on T1- and T2-weighted images, with both office and average daily blood pressure values in a population of 73 healthy normotensive and hypertensive elderly individuals (70 +/- 6 years old). Lacunae were detected in 34 subjects (47%); the number per subject ranged from 0 to 19 and was significantly correlated with advancing age. Furthermore, these changes were supposedly related to the average of noninvasive ambulatory (24-hour and during awake and asleep periods) pressure recordings but not to office pressures. The grade of periventricular hyperintensity was also significantly associated with advancing age and the average of ambulatory systolic pressure recordings, particularly during sleep, but not with office blood pressure. In comparisons of normotensive, "office hypertensive," and hypertensive subgroups, abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging were appropriate to the level of the 24-hour blood pressure measurements but not to that of clinic pressure. In hypertensive patients, the presence of electrocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy was also associated with greater abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging. We conclude that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is superior to casual pressure measurements in predicting latent cerebrovascular disease, which is unexpectedly common in apparently healthy elderly subjects.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus self-measurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage

OBJECTIVE: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and home blood pressure measurements predicted the presence of target organ damage and the risk of cardiovascular events better than did office blood pressure. METHODS: To compare these two methods in their correlation with organ damage, we consecutively included 325 treated (70%) or untreated hypertensives (125 women, mean age = 64.5 +/- 11.3) with office (three measurements at two consultations), home (three measurements morning and evening over 3 days) and 24-h ambulatory monitoring. Target organs were evaluated by ECG, echocardiography, carotid echography and detection of microalbuminuria. Data from 302 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean BP levels were 142/82 mmHg for office, 135.5/77 mmHg for home and 128/76 mmHg for 24-h monitoring (day = 130/78 mmHg; night = 118.5/67 mmHg). With a 135 mmHg cut-off, home and daytime blood pressure diverged in 20% of patients. Ambulatory and Home blood pressure were correlated with organ damage more closely than was office BP with a trend to better correlations with home BP. Using regression analysis, a 140 mmHg home systolic blood pressure corresponded to a 135 mmHg daytime systolic blood pressure; a 133 mmHg daytime ambulatory blood pressure and a 140 mmHg home blood pressure corresponded to the same organ damage cut-offs (Left ventricular mass index = 50 g/m, Cornell.QRS = 2440 mm/ms, carotid intima media thickness = 0.9 mm). Home-ambulatory differences were significantly associated with age and antihypertensive treatment. CONCLUSION: We showed that home blood pressure was at least as well correlated with target organ damage, as was the ambulatory blood pressure. Home-ambulatory correlation and their correlation with organ damage argue in favor of different cut-offs, that are approximately 5 mmHg higher for systolic home blood pressure.     

Losartan controlled blood pressure and reduced left ventricular hypertrophy but did not alter arrhythmias in hypertensive men with preserved systolic function

The effect of antihypertensive therapy on arrhythmias is controversial. An initial study in patients with chronic heart failure indicated that losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, may possess antiarrhythmic properties. However, the effect of AT1 receptor antagonists on arrhythmias of subjects with good systolic function has never been evaluated. Thirty-nine men with primary hypertension (18 without left ventricular hypertrophy [LVH], and 21 with LVH, aged 48.2 +/-8.6 and 50.5 +/-6.0 years, respectively), 15 healthy normotensive subjects (47.9 +/-8.5 years), and 14 highly trained athletes (34.1 +/-1.6 years) were studied. Transthoracic echocardiography and 24-hour Holter ambulatory monitoring were performed at baseline (without treatment). Hypertensive patients underwent the same examinations after 8 months of losartan administration. The prevalence and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias, and the frequency of supraventricular arrhythmias were increased in hypertensive patients with LVH compared to normotensive controls and athletes, at baseline. A similar significant reduction of blood pressure (BP) was noted in both groups of patients (p < 0.001). The LVH was reduced in hypertensives with LVH (the left ventricular mass index by 12%, the interventricular septum by 8.1%, the posterior wall by 7%, all p < 0.01). However, the arrhythmias did not change in either group of patients, even if all hypertensives were considered as 1 group. In conclusion, an 8-month course with losartan was effective in lowering BP and reducing LVH. However, the increased arrhythmias, which were registered in hypertensive patients with LVH at baseline, did not change.     

Masked hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Relationship with left-ventricular structure and function

BACKGROUND: To evaluate in type 2 diabetes mellitus the relationship between masked hypertension (MH) and left ventricular (LV) morpho-functional characteristics. METHODS: Using 24-hour BP monitoring and echocardiography, we evaluated 71 type 2 diabetic patients, without overt cardiac disease and never treated with antihypertensive drugs: 45 normotensive subjects with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg and 26 sustained hypertensives (SH)(clinic BP > or = 140 and/or 90 mmHg and 24-hour BP > or =125 and/or 80 mmHg), matched for age, gender, BMI and duration of diabetes with clinically normotensive patients. MH was diagnosed with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg and 24-hour BP > or =125 and/or 80 mmHg. RESULTS: Among clinically normotensive patients, 21 (47%) had MH and 24 were true normotensive (NT, 24-hour BP <125/80 mmHg). LV mass increased from NT to MH to SH (p < 0.001); the parameters of LV diastolic function were similar between MH and SH and significantly lower than in NT. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetic patients with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg, MH is frequent and is associated with LV remodelling characterized by increased myocardial mass and preclinical impairment of LV diastolic function; the remodelling is qualitatively and for some aspects also quantitatively similar to that found in sustained hypertensive patients. Therefore it would be useful to look for MH in diabetic subjects with clinic BP <130/85 mmHg, who, following the guidelines, are not entitled to antihypertensive treatment: the finding of MH could identify a subgroup of patients at higher cardiovascular risk and therefore needing a prompt antihypertensive treatment.     

How good are standardized blood pressure recordings for diagnosing hypertension? A comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was compared with office blood pressure in 48 normotensive, 81 borderline hypertensives and 35 untreated hypertensives. The studied groups were chosen from a geographically defined population of middle-aged men in southern Sweden. The mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values for the normotensives, borderline hypertensives and untreated hypertensives were 120/76, 127/82 and 140/92 mmHg, respectively. The diurnal mean ambulatory blood pressure in the three groups was 126/80, 134/86 and 146/96 mmHg, respectively. The percentage of 24-h diastolic blood pressure peaks greater than or equal to 95 mmHg in the groups were 7%, 22% and 53%, respectively. The corresponding values greater than or equal to 90 mmHg were 16%, 38% and 69%, respectively. In the untreated hypertensive group, there was a more pronounced (P less than 0.05) systolic blood pressure increase during the morning hours (0600-1000 h) than in the normotensive and borderline hypertensive groups. Fourteen per cent of the hypertensives showed normal blood pressure values during 24-h blood pressure monitoring. Fifteen per cent of the borderline hypertensives were normotensive during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring despite repeated office diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg. The opposite (increased blood pressure during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and at screening but normal office blood pressure) was seen in 14% of the borderline hypertensives. Normotensives were characterized by lower mean blood pressure values, fewer blood pressure peaks and a lower systolic blood pressure increase during the morning hours than hypertensives in this study of middle-aged men. The established way of diagnosing hypertension, borderline hypertension and normotension correlated well with the results of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.     

Arterial hypertension increases left ventricular mass: role of tight blood pressure control

In middle-age hypertensives from the Gubbio Population Study, we evaluated the relationship between blood pressure (BP) control over a long time and the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A population survey was performed in 1982-1985 and repeated in 1989-1992. During the second survey, subjects in the age range 40-60 years were invited to undergo an M-mode echocardiographic examination. A total of 487 subjects who participated in both surveys are included in the present analysis. Some of them (294) were normotensive (Group 1), 110 were hypertensive but had never taken antihypertensive drugs (Group 2), 47 hypertensives on drugs were in good BP control (Group 3) and 36 hypertensives on drugs had uncontrolled hypertension (Group 4). BP values at the 1989-1992 examination were, respectively, 122/77, 145/86, 124/78 and 153/91 mmHg, while 7 years earlier were 122/77, 133/84, 136/85 and 152/95 mmHg. Despite normal BP levels in Group 3, left ventricular mass index (LVMi, g/m(2.7)) was greater than in normotensives (42.4+/-10, 46.6+/-13, 47.0+/-10, 51.9+/-15 g/m(2.7)). Accordingly, the prevalence of LVH (LVMi >51 g/m(2.7)) was 18, 26.4, 36.7 and 50% in groups 1-4, respectively. The 193 hypertensives were, thereafter, divided according to BP control (ie <140/90 mmHg) on both surveys (1983-1985 and 1989-1992): 27 hypertensives with optimal BP levels on both visits also had a ventricular mass similar to normotensives and significantly lower than the other hypertensives (LVMi 44.6+/-11.6 vs 48.5+/-13.2, P<0.001). In conclusion, these findings indicate that hypertensive patients with BP values at levels similar to those in normotensives for a long period do not increase their left ventricular mass in comparison to subjects with normal BP levels.     

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension"

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.     

Hypertension prevalence, awareness, control and association with metabolic abnormalities in the San Marino population: the SMOOTH study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the SMOOTH (San Marino Observational Outlooking Trial on Hypertension) study was to explore hypertension awareness, treatment and control and the associated metabolic abnormalities and risk factors in the population of San Marino, a small state in the Mediterranean area, for which limited evidence is available. METHODS: Nine general practitioners enrolled 4590 consecutive subjects (44% of the San Marino population age 40-75 years), seen in their office by collecting history, physical and laboratory data and office blood pressure (BP) measurements. RESULTS: Of these subjects, 2446 were normotensive and 2144 hypertensive; 62.3% of hypertensive patients were aware of their condition, 58.6% were treated (monotherapy 31.5%, combination therapy 27.1%), and 21.7% were controlled. Hypertension awareness and treatment were more frequent above age 50 and in females; BP control was similarly low in both genders. As compared to normotensives, hypertensive subjects were less frequently smokers (20.1 versus 27.8%), had greater body mass index (28.1 +/- 4.5 versus 25.8 +/- 3.7 g/m), and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (15.8 versus 6.3%), lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and higher prevalence of increased blood total cholesterol (66.1 versus 51.3%), triglycerides and serum uric acid. Values of subjects with 'high-normal' blood pressure were closer to those of hypertensive subjects. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects, and in treated than in untreated hypertensives. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a small Mediterranean country with high health-care standards, hypertension awareness, treatment and control are inadequate and hypertension clusters with metabolic abnormalities and risk factors as in non-Mediterranean areas.