Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: a comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixation.

Introduction Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing of humeral shaft fractures is reported to cause shoulder joint impairment. This retrospective study compared shoulder joint symptoms, range of motion (ROM), and isometric strength after antegrade IM nailing and dynamic compression (DC) plating of humeral shaft fractures.Materials and methods We compared 29 patients with DC plating and 44 with antegrade IM nailing of their humeral shaft fractures. Shoulder pain, LInsalata and Constant scores, shoulder joint ROM and isometric shoulder strengths were measured after mean follow-up of 6.2 (1–15) years (DC plating) and 5.5 (2–10) years (IM nailing).Results Patients had nonsignificantly more shoulder pain after IM nailing than after DC plating. Shoulder scores and isometric strength measurements showed no difference between the groups. Flexion was significantly better after DC plating, but none of the other ROM parameters differed between the groups. The shoulder scores and all ROM and strength parameters of the injured side were significantly lower than on the uninjured side in both groups.Conclusions Shoulder joint ROM and strength does not recover to normal after humeral shaft fracture. Antegrade IM nailing if performed properly is not responsible for shoulder joint impairment.     

Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. A retrospective study of 126 cases.

Antegrade intramedullary nailing with four different implants was used in 126 humeral shaft fractures. There were 74 acute fractures, 17 pathologic fractures, 16 fractures malaligned in a hanging cast or brace, 15 fractures with delayed union and 4 fractures that were nailed after failed open reduction and internal fixation. The nonunion rate was 21/95 after primary operation, and after reoperations 14/95. Distraction of the fracture was a significant cause of nonunion, but not type of fracture, localization, implant, and delay between injury and surgery. Shoulder joint function was significantly impaired in 25/67 patients. The patients regarded the result as good or satisfactory in 41/67 of the cases who were followed mean 3 (0.5-10) years. We conclude that antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures leads to a substantial risk of non-union and impairment of shoulder function. It can be recommended as primary treatment only when nonoperative treatment is likely to fail.     

Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: A retrospective study of 126 cases

Antegrade intramedullary nailing with four different implants was used in 126 humeral shaft fractures. There were 74 acute fractures, 17 pathologic fractures, 16 fractures malaligned in a hanging cast or brace, 15 fractures with delayed union and 4 fractures that were nailed after failed open reduction and internal fixation. The nonunion rate was 21/95 after primary operation, and after reoperations 14/95. Distraction of the fracture was a significant cause of nonunion, but not type of fracture, localization, implant, and delay between injury and surgery. Shoulder joint function was significantly impaired in 25/67 patients. The patients regarded the result as good or satisfactory in 41/67 of the cases who were followed mean 3 (0.5-10) years.

We conclude that antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures leads to a substantial risk of non-union and impairment of shoulder function. It can be recommended as primary treatment only when nonoperative treatment is likely to fail.     

Closed interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of the Russell-Taylor humeral nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective with a mean radiologic and clinical follow-up at thirty-two months. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Total of thirty-seven patients treated with the Russell-Taylor humeral nail. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated with the Russell-Taylor humeral nail inserted in an antegrade fashion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiologic union and shoulder function in terms of pain, power, range of movement, and activities of daily living. RESULTS: There were four established nonunions and four cases of delayed union (time to union > four months). Age of patient was the only predictor of nonunion. There was one infection and one intraoperative fracture. Two prominent proximal screws required removal, and one nail was removed after union because of impingement. Three patients required manipulation under anesthesia to improve shoulder movement. At review, six patients had residual poor shoulder function as per Constant score, four attributable to shoulder stiffness and two to residual pain. CONCLUSION: The authors' findings indicate a significant rate of delayed or nonunion in the elderly patient. When the high rate of union with conservative treatment is considered, the indications and rationale for intramedullary humeral nailing should be clearly defined.     

微创技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨干近端骨折

目的评价微创接骨板固定(MIPO)技术置入PHILOS(proximal humeral internal locking system)治疗肱骨干近端骨折的临床效果。方法自2008年11月~2009年8月,采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗23例肱骨干近端移位骨折。结果本组获随访6～17个月,平均11.3个月。X线片示22例于术后6个月内骨折达骨性愈合;1例因内固定松动发生延迟愈合,但无临床症状,于术后9个月骨折愈合,功能恢复至可。术后半年1例发生肩关节撞击征,取出内固定行功能锻炼后功能恢复至可。采用Constant-Murley评分方法评定疗效:优11例,良10例,可2例,优良率91.3%。结论采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折是一种良好的方法,减少骨不连发生率,有利于肩关节早期功能恢复。     

Effect of dynamization in open interlocking nailing of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized comparative study of 50 cases with a 2-year follow-up

This prospective randomized comparative study evaluated the role of dynamization of interlocking nails after open reduction and internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures. Fifty femoral shaft fractures were treated by open interlocking nailing and were statically locked. Twenty six of these 50 patients were randomly selected for dynamization and the other 24 were treated without dynamization. The patients were followed up for at least 2 years. The 26 cases which were dynamized went on to union between 13 and 28 weeks (average 19.2 weeks) with two poor results, including one nonunion. The cases that were not dynamized went on to union between 16 and 30 weeks (average 23.5 weeks) with two poor results, including one nail breakage. Though final results are comparable, the study suggests that dynamization after open interlocking nailing significantly shortens the mean time to union, though it does not significantly affect the union rate of the femoral shaft fractures.     

Isolated interfragmentary compression for nonunion of humeral shaft fractures initially treated by nailing: A preliminary report of seven cases

Introduction

Plating with bone grafting is considered the gold standard treatment for nonunion of humeral shaft fractures. However, this complex procedure involves multiple risks. The aim of this study is to evaluate an alternative treatment using isolated axial interfragmentary compression for the dynamisation of humeral shaft nonunion after retrograde locked nailing.

Materials and methods

Between January 2000 and May 2009, 124 humeral shaft fractures were treated in our trauma department with retrograde locked nailing using the unreamed humeral nail (UHN^®, Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA). Nonunion occurred in seven patients (5.6%) – five females and two males, mean age 44 years (range: 17–73 years). The nonunion was treated by applying isolated secondary interfragmentary compression. Mean follow-up was 43 months (range: 8–74 months). The Rommens score and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score were used to evaluate the global functioning of the upper limb.

Results

The compression procedure was successful in all seven cases. In each case, the union occurred without any complications in 3–5 months. The mean DASH score was 25/100 (range: 8.3–60.8/100). The Rommens score was judged excellent for five of the seven patients but two were rated moderate. One of these suffered from complex regional pain syndrome type II since the fracture, and another developed a stiff shoulder 6 months after trauma.

Conclusion

Isolated secondary interfragmentary compression appears to be a simple and successful procedure in cases of humeral nonunion.     

The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of different surgical options in the treatment of nonunion of a femoral shaft fracture after initial intramedullary nailing. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a seven-year period a total of 278 skeletally mature patients with 280 fresh femoral shaft fractures were treated by intramedullary nailing. Of these patients, a subgroup of consecutive patients with nonunion of the fracture were subjected to a detailed analysis and were followed until the fracture was united (mean thirty-three months). Injury mechanism, fracture pattern using various established classifications, any possible concomitant injuries, complications, and subsequent surgical interventions were recorded. RESULTS: Of the total of 280 fractures, nonunion was observed in thirty-four patients with thirty-five fractures (12.5 percent). To achieve solid union, one reoperation was sufficient in twenty-five fractures, six fractures had to be operated on twice, and four needed three operations. There were five patients with autogenous bone grafting alone, and all five required a further reoperation for the nonunion. After a dynamization procedure, four of seventeen patients required a further reoperation. After eight exchange nailing procedures, further surgery for nonunion was necessary in only one case. Solid union was achieved within six months after the final successful reoperation. A marked shortening of the femur developed as a local complication in six cases, four of which had undergone dynamization as final treatment before solid union. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing without extracortical bone grafting seems to be the most effective method to treat a disturbed union of a femoral shaft fracture after intramedullary nailing. Autogenous extracortical bone grafting alone proved to be insufficient. Dynamization predisposed to shortening of the bone.     

Open exchange locked nailing in humeral nonunions after intramedullary nailing

Humeral nonunions after cannulated intramedullary nailing have been difficult to reconstruct. In the current study, 23 consecutive patients were treated by open exchange locked nailing with bone grafting. There were 16 men and seven women with a mean age of 46.2 years. The nonunions followed humeral locked nailing in eight patients, Seidel nailing in 13, and Küntscher nailing in two. The average nonunion time was 14.7 months. The nonunions, located at the proximal (1/3) in four humeri, middle (1/3) in 15, and distal (1/3) in four, were antegrade nailed in 10 and retrograde nailed in 13. Nineteen had 8-mm nails and four had 7-mm nails. Supplementary wiring was used in 19 patients. The average followup was 21.4 months. With one surgery, all but one patient (96%) achieved osseous union in, on average, 16.3 weeks. One patient with chronic renal dialysis had persistent nonunion and an osteolytic supracondylar fracture. Other complications included one postoperative radial nerve palsy, one brachial artery injury, and one wire infection. At followup, all patients with solid union had excellent or satisfactory recovery of shoulder function. The average postoperative Neer score (90.7) was significantly better than the average preoperative score (68.5). Two patients had losses of elbow motion of 10 degrees and 20 degrees, respectively. This study shows that humeral nonunion after cannulated intramedullary nailing can be treated effectively by open exchange locked nailing with bone grafting. Supplementary wiring can compress the nonunion and facilitate bone healing.     

Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiographic results for locked intramedullary (IM) nails and plates used in the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures. DESIGN: Prospective randomization by sealed-envelope technique of eighty-four patients into two study groups: those treated by intramedullary nailing (IMN group; n = 38) and those treated by compression plating (PLT group; n = 46). SETTING: Patients admitted consecutively to a university-affiliated Level I trauma center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: All skeletally mature patients admitted to Harborview Medical Center with acute humeral shaft fractures requiring surgical stabilization. Fractures of the diaphysis were defined as being at least three centimeters distal to the surgical neck and at least five centimeters proximal to the olecranon fossa. INTERVENTION: Treatment with locking antegrade intramedullary humeral nails (Russell-Taylor design [Smith and Nephew Richards]) or with 4.5-millimeter dynamic compression and limited contact dynamic compression plates (AO design [Synthes]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcome measurements included fracture healing, radial nerve recovery, infection, and elbow and shoulder discomfort. Radiographic measurements included fracture alignment, time to healing, delayed union, and nonunion. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged thirteen months. Forty-two fractures (93 percent) in the PLT group were healed by sixteen weeks versus thirty-three fractures (87 percent) in the IMN group (p = 0.70). Shoulder pain and a decrement in shoulder range of motion (ROM) were significant associations with IMN (p = 0.007 for both variables) but not with PLT. A decrement in elbow ROM was significantly associated with PLT (p = 0.03), especially for fractures of the distal third of the diaphysis, whereas elbow pain was not (p = 0.123). The sum of other complications demonstrated nearly equal prevalence for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients requiring surgical treatment of a humeral shaft fracture, intramedullary nailing and compression plating both provide predictable methods for achieving fracture stabilization and ultimate healing.     

PHILOS 接骨板治疗复杂肱骨干中上段骨折的初步报告

目的 评价肱骨近端内固定锁定系统(PHILOS)接骨板治疗复杂肱骨干中上段骨折的临床疗效.方法 2007年4月至2008年1月,应用PHILOS接骨板治疗复杂肱骨干中上段骨折16例,男6例,女10例;年龄54～88岁,平均71.5岁;左侧11例,右侧5例;按AO/OTA分型:CI型4例,C2型3例,C3型9例.术中记录手术总时间,PHILOS接骨板置放时间,术中出血量.采用Constant-Murley肩关节评分标准,对患者健侧、患侧肩关节进行评分,同时计算患侧评分占健侧评分的百分比,＞80%为优良.60%～80%为满意,＜60%为差.结果 手术总时间为75～160 min,平均115 min;PHILOS接骨板置放时间25～45 min,平均35 min;术中出血量为150～525 ml,平均350 ml;住院时间为17～22 d,平均18.5 d.14例患者获得随访,随访时间5～12个月,平均9.6个月.骨折愈合时间7～16周,平均12.1周.骨折端无移位,螺钉无松动、拔出及断钉,患侧肱骨头较健侧无吸收、缩小征象;患侧肩关节前届上举活动度为120°～170°,平均150°.末次随访时Constant-Murley评分平均为78.5分(62～92分);患侧评分占健侧评分的百分比为75.6%～97.6%,平均87.6%;优良12例,满意2例,优良率为85.7%.结论 应用长型PHILOS锁定加压接骨板治疗复杂肱骨干中上段骨折可获得较理想的临床疗效.     

Outcome Assessment of Operative Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Antegrade Unreamed Humeral Nailing (UHN)

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of humeral shaft fractures treated with Unreamed Humeral Nailing (UHN) system. Fixation of the humeral shaft fractures in this study was performed by minimal incision UHN system, without using its distal locking properties. Forty one patients were treated this way. Functional status of shoulder and elbow were evaluated using Society of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (SASES) scoring system. During follow up period, no superficial or deep infections were observed. Mean union time was 13 weeks. Shoulder and elbow functions using SASES scale were excellent or good in 93 % of the patients. Complications included delayed union in 3(7.3 %), nonunion in 2(4.8 %) and radial nerve palsy in 1(2.4 %). Antegrade unreamed humeral Nailing is an acceptable, safe and reliable treatment for humeral shaft fractures.     

Shoulder and elbow function following Marchetti-Vicenzi humeral nail fixation

Humeral nailing has been associated with reduction of shoulder and elbow function. We present the results of fixation of 15 diaphyseal humeral fractures with Marchetti-Vicenzi nails (B Braun Medical Aesculap). Shoulder and elbow functions were assessed by the Constant shoulder and Mayo elbow scoring systems. The average Constant Shoulder score was good (82.5/100) and the average Mayo Elbow Score was excellent (95.4/100). The indications for surgery included nonunion, pathological fractures and poor fracture position. The mean follow-up was 67 weeks with an average interval to surgery of 19 weeks. The mean time to union was 19 weeks. All the fractures united without any patient requiring any further procedure. There were two postoperative radial nerve palsies and one median nerve palsy, however two patients had complete recovery and one had partial recovery of the radial nerve. There was one deep infection requiring removal of the implant. There were no implant failures. Based on our experience, the Marchetti-Vicenzi humeral nail appears as a relatively safe implant and its use has been associated with preservation of good shoulder and elbow functions.     

Treatment of humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions with humeral locked nails

OBJECTIVE: To report experience with use of humeral locked nails in treating humeral delayed unions and nonunions. The following techniques yielded encouragingly good results: static locking, short-to-long segment nailing, bone grafting, fracture compression, and minimal surgical trauma. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 41 consecutive patients with 13 delayed unions and 28 nonunions were treated with humeral locked nails. Delay from trauma to surgery averaged 4.2 months for delayed union and 15.5 months for nonunion. The average age of patients was 50.2 years; average follow-up time was 23.2 months. There were 7 proximal-third fractures, 21 middle-third fractures, and 13 distal-third fractures. The antegrade approach was used for 13 fractures and retrograde for 28. Open nailing was performed in 39 fractures and closed nailing in 2. If the fracture motion was still present after nail insertion, axial compression of the fracture site was specially applied. Bone grafting was performed in the fractures with open nailing. Thirty-four fractures were nailed with 8-mm nails, and 7 fractures were nailed with 7-mm nails. RESULTS: With a single operation, all but two patients achieved osseous union in, on average, 5.6 months. One of these two patients eventually gained union after another surgery with fracture compression along the original nail and concurrent bone grafting. The second patient, undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal failure, had persistent nonunion. At follow-up, for patients with antegrade nailing, all but four patients had less than 20 degrees limitation of shoulder abduction. For patients with retrograde nailing, all but two had less than 10 degrees limitation of elbow motion. Only the patient with persistent nonunion had continual pain and significant impairment of arm function. CONCLUSIONS: Humeral locked nailing seems to be effective for humeral delayed unions or nonunions. It may be an acceptable alternative for fractures unsuited for plate fixation, such as those with comminution, osteoporosis, or a severely adhered radial nerve.     

Closed retrograde Hackethal nail stabilization of humeral shaft fractures.

We retrospectively reviewed 48 consecutive humeral shaft fractures treated with Hackethal stacked, flexible, intramedullary (IM) nails. The indications for fixation were polytrauma or fracture patterns not amenable to bracing. The average age of patients was 40 years. Eight had associated primary nerve injuries. All fractures were reduced closed, and the nails were inserted retrograde through a distal posterior cortical window. Follow-up was possible in 33 patients. Ninety-seven percent (32 of 33) had healed at 1 year. There were no iatrogenic nerve palsies. There was one delayed union, one nonunion, one deep infection, and three occurrences of heterotopic ossification at the entry portal. Two patients with distal nail migration required second operations. Clinical examination showed normal range of motion at the shoulder and an average of 5 degrees loss of extension at the elbow. Hackethal's bundled IM nailing was shown to be a reliable, inexpensive, and relatively atraumatic method for stabilization of simple and comminuted humeral shaft fractures.     

Marchetti nailing of humeral shaft delayed unions

The purpose of this study is to present the results of Marchetti nailing in humeral shaft delayed unions. Fifteen humeral shaft delayed unions were treated with the Marchetti nail. The average age of patients was 52.3 years. All had been treated initially by conservative methods. Delay from trauma to surgery averaged 4.8 months. The nailing technique was retrograde, and reaming of the fracture focus was always performed. Bone graft was not added. Thirteen patients achieved union, in an average of 3.3 months. Two patients require further surgery to gain union. Shoulder and elbow motion was excellent in 10 patients, moderate in four and poor in one. The functional result was excellent in nine patients, good in two, fair in two, and poor in two. Marchetti nailing seems to be an acceptable alternative for humeral shaft delayed unions.     

肱骨交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨骨折术后骨不连

目的介绍应用肱骨交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨骨折术后骨不连的经验。方法1997年10月～2001年7月,应用肱骨交锁髓内钉治疗12例肱骨骨折术后骨不连患者,其中肥大型5例,萎缩型2例,假关节形成5例。受伤至骨不连手术的时间平均为10．5个月(5～33个月)。手术采用开放复位顺行置入髓内钉,锁入远端交锁钉后向近端打拔以使断端加压,自体髂骨及RBX植骨。结果所有患者获平均21个月(9～51个月)随访。12例患者骨不连均获得愈合,平均愈合时间为5．8个月(3．5～8．0个月)。其中1例去除髓内钉后1年于原骨不连部位发生再骨折,重新植骨内固定而获得愈合。11例肩关节及上肢功能恢复良好。所有患者未遗留神经损伤症状。结论肱骨交锁髓内钉为治疗肱骨骨折术后骨不连的有效方法。     

Success of exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft nonunion or delayed union

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the success of exchange reamed femoral nailing in the treatment of femoral nonunion after intramedullary (IM) nailing, and to analyze factors that may contribute to failure of exchange reamed femoral nailing. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive clinical series. SETTING: Level I trauma center and tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients were identified whose radiographs failed to show progression of healing for four months after treatment with a reamed IM femoral nail. Nineteen patients had undergone primary IM nailing of an acute femoral shaft fracture, one patient had been converted to an IM nail after initially being treated in an external fixator, and three patients had previously undergone an unsuccessful exchange reamed nailing. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated by exchange reamed femoral nailing. The diameter of the new nail was one to three millimeters larger than that of the previous nail (the majority were two millimeters larger). The intramedullary canal was overreamed by one millimeter more than the diameter of the nail. Most of the nails were statically locked, and care was taken to avoid distraction of the nonunion site by reverse impaction after distal interlocking was performed or by applying compression with a femoral distractor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic evaluation of union was determined by the presence of healing on at least three of four cortices. Factors reviewed included the patient's age, smoking history, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, whether the initial fracture was open or closed, the pattern and location of the fracture, the type of nonunion, the increase in nail diameter, whether the nail was dynamically or statically locked, and the results of any intraoperative cultures. RESULTS: Tobacco use was found to have a detrimental impact on the success of exchange reamed nailing. All eight of the nonsmokers healed after exchange reamed nailing, whereas only ten of the fifteen smokers (66.7 percent) healed after exchange reamed nailing. Overall, exchange reamed femoral nailing was successful in eighteen cases (78.3 percent). Three patients achieved union with additional procedures. Intramedullary cultures were positive in five cases; all of these achieved successful union. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange reamed nailing remains the treatment of choice for most femoral diaphyseal nonunions. Exchange reamed IM nailing has low morbidity, may obviate the need for additional bone grafting, and allows full weight-bearing and active rehabilitation. Tobacco use appears to have an adverse effect on nonunion healing after exchange reamed femoral nailing.     

Open intramedullary nailing with tension band and locking sutures for proximal humeral fracture: hot air balloon technique

To reduce complications and increase fixation after the internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures, interlocking intramedullary nailing and tension-band and locking sutures were used simultaneously, and their results are reviewed. Twenty-six consecutive patients who underwent open intramedullary nailing with tension-band and locking sutures for proximal humeral fractures were selected. The mean follow-up period was 39 months. With regard to the functional evaluation, the mean Neer score was 90 points and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 85. When patients were divided into those aged less than 65 years and those aged 65 years or greater and into those with 2-part fractures and those with 3-part fractures, postoperative pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the Neer score showed no difference between the 2 groups. Open intramedullary nailing accompanied by tension-band and locking sutures for proximal humeral fractures shows sufficient fixation in older patients, and therefore, good postoperative shoulder function can be expected.     

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail

Antegrade interlocked humeral nailing for stabilization of humeral fractures was introduced many years ago, and studies on this method in the orthopedic literature have shown mixed results. The purpose of this investigation was to document the clinical outcome and complications associated with the use of an antegrade intramedullary nail (T2, Stryker) for the humeral fractures. Between 2005 and 2008, 52 fractures of the humeral shaft were treated operatively with this intramedullary nail in our department. Eight patients were polytraumatized, and four patients had an open fracture. The mean age of patients was 51.7 years. Forty-eight patients had an adequate duration of clinical follow-up (a mean of 18 months) for analysis. Complications were recorded, and the time to union was measured. Shoulder and elbow functions were assessed using the Constant Score and the Morrey Score, respectively. Forty-six fractures healed, with a mean time to clinical union of 10.3 weeks. Two patients developed pseudarthroses. There were four adverse events: two proximal screws backed out, one superficial infection at the insertion point, and one fracture at the distal end of the nail. Ninety-one percentage of patients had an excellent or good shoulder function. Five further operations were necessary: two for treatment of pseudarthroses, two for removal the backed out proximal screws, and one wound debridement for superficial infection. Antegrade humeral nailing is a valid therapeutic option for stabilization of humeral shaft fractures. By strictly adhering to the operation technique, the number and the severity of complications can be reduced. When good fracture alignment and stability are obtained, uneventful bone healing with good functional results is the rule.