Measurement of respiratory system resistance during mechanical ventilation

Background The measurement of respiratory system resistance during mechanical ventilation is important to ascertain the causes of increase in airway pressure during volume-controlled ventilation, which may include airways resistance and decreased respiratory system compliance. Discussion Separation of total resistance from compliance of the respiratory system can be assessed by the end-inspiratory hold maneuver that separates peak pressure from plateau pressure. Conclusions Although this method assumes a homogeneous respiratory system, it has proven useful clinically to separate flow-dependence issues such as bronchospasm or endotracheal tube obstruction from stiff lungs (acute lung injury) or decrease chest wall (abdominal distension) compliance.     

Respiratory mechanics and ventilator waveforms in the patient with acute lung injury

Acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome is a syndrome of low respiratory compliance. However, longstanding knowledge of applied respiratory mechanics and refined imaging techniques have shown that this is clearly an oversimplified view. Though the average compliance of the respiratory system is reproducibly low, regional mechanics may vastly differ; lung, airway, and chest wall mechanics may be variably affected; finally, these abnormalities may be very dynamic in nature, being influenced by time, posture, and the way positive-pressure ventilation is applied. Modern mechanical ventilators are equipped to display pressure, flow, and volume waveforms that can be used to measure respiratory compliance, airway resistance, and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure. These basic measurements, once the domain of applied physiologists only, are now available to aid clinicians to choose the appropriate ventilator settings to promote lung recruitment and avoid injury during lung-protective ventilatory strategies. High-resolution lung imaging and bedside recording of physiologic variables are important tools for clinicians who want to deliver specialized care to improve the outcome of critically ill patients in acute respiratory failure.     

Bench-to-bedside review: Chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients

The importance of chest wall elastance in characterizing acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and in setting mechanical ventilation is increasingly recognized. Nearly 30% of patients admitted to a general intensive care unit have an abnormal high intra-abdominal pressure (due to ascites, bowel edema, ileus), which leads to an increase in the chest wall elastance. At a given applied airway pressure, the pleural pressure increases according to (in the static condition) the equation: pleural pressure = airway pressure × (chest wall elastance/total respiratory system elastance). Consequently, for a given applied pressure, the increase in pleural pressure implies a decrease in transpulmonary pressure (airway pressure – pleural pressure), which is the distending force of the lung, implies a decrease of the strain and of ventilator-induced lung injury, implies the need to use a higher airway pressure during the recruitment maneuvers to reach a sufficient transpulmonary opening pressure, implies hemodynamic risk due to the reductions in venous return and heart size, and implies a possible increase of lung edema, partially due to the reduced edema clearance. It is always important in the most critically ill patients to assess the intra-abdominal pressure and the chest wall elastance.     

Recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure/tidal ventilation titration in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: translating experimental results to clinical practice

Recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)/tidal ventilation titration in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) are the cornerstone of mechanical ventilatory support. The net result of these possible adjustments in ventilatory parameters is the interaction of the pressure applied in the respiratory system (airway pressure/end expiratory pressure) counterbalanced by chest wall configuration/abdominal pressure along the mechanical ventilatory support duration. Refinements in the ventilatory adjustments in ALI/ARDS are necessary for minimizing the biotrauma in this still life-threatening clinical problem.     

Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE: Pressure inflating the lung during mechanical ventilation is the difference between pressure applied at the airway opening (Pao) and pleural pressure (Ppl). Depending on the chest wall's contribution to respiratory mechanics, a given positive end-expiratory and/or end-inspiratory plateau pressure may be appropriate for one patient but inadequate or potentially injurious for another. Thus, failure to account for chest wall mechanics may affect results in clinical trials of mechanical ventilation strategies in acute respiratory distress syndrome. By measuring esophageal pressure (Pes), we sought to characterize influence of the chest wall on Ppl and transpulmonary pressure (PL) in patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care units at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: Placement of esophageal balloon-catheters. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Airway, esophageal, and gastric pressures recorded at end-exhalation and end-inflation Pes averaged 17.5 +/- 5.7 cm H2O at end-expiration and 21.2 +/- 7.7 cm H2O at end-inflation and were not significantly correlated with body mass index or chest wall elastance. Estimated PL was 1.5 +/- 6.3 cm H2O at end-expiration, 21.4 +/- 9.3 cm H2O at end-inflation, and 18.4 +/- 10.2 cm H2O (n = 40) during an end-inspiratory hold (plateau). Although PL at end-expiration was significantly correlated with positive end-expiratory pressure (p < .0001), only 24% of the variance in PL was explained by Pao (R = .243), and 52% was due to variation in Pes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients in acute respiratory failure, elevated esophageal pressures suggest that chest wall mechanical properties often contribute substantially and unpredictably to total respiratory impedance, and therefore Pao may not adequately predict PL or lung distention. Systematic use of esophageal manometry has the potential to improve ventilator management in acute respiratory failure by providing more direct assessment of lung distending pressure.     

Clinical review: The implications of experimental and clinical studies of recruitment maneuvers in acute lung injury

Mechanical ventilation can cause and perpetuate lung injury if alveolar overdistension, cyclic collapse, and reopening of alveolar units occur. The use of low tidal volume and limited airway pressure has improved survival in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. The use of recruitment maneuvers has been proposed as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation to re-expand collapsed lung tissue. Many investigators have studied the benefits of recruitment maneuvers in healthy anesthetized patients and in patients ventilated with low positive end-expiratory pressure. However, it is unclear whether recruitment maneuvers are useful when patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome are ventilated with high positive end-expiratory pressure, and in the presence of lung fibrosis or a stiff chest wall. Moreover, it is unclear whether the use of high airway pressures during recruitment maneuvers can cause bacterial translocation. This article reviews the intrinsic mechanisms of mechanical stress, the controversy regarding clinical use of recruitment maneuvers, and the interactions between lung infection and application of high intrathoracic pressures.     

Prone-position ventilation induces sustained improvement in oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who have a large shunt

OBJECTIVES: Prone-position ventilation (PPV) induces acute improvement in oxygenation in many patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with some maintaining their oxygenation even after they were returned to the supine position, but it is unclear what clinical factors determine the sustained oxygenation benefit. We hypothesized that patients with ARDS who have a larger shunt would have a better acute and sustained oxygenation response to PPV. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized interventional study. SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care units, university tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-two consecutive patients, with ARDS with an average PaO2/FiO2 of 94, were administered PPV for 12 hrs followed by supine-position ventilation for 2 hrs. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamic and gas exchange variables were monitored. The shunt was measured as venous admixture at an FiO2 of 1.0, and compliances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall were measured by the esophageal balloon technique before PPV, during PPV, and during subsequent supine-position ventilation. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen patients (64%) responded to PPV, with PaO2/FiO2 increasing by > or =20. These changes were associated with a decrease in chest wall compliance. Responders had significantly shorter time from ARDS to PPV, a lower baseline PaO2/FiO2, and a higher venous admixture. All responders maintained the improvement in oxygenation and had a greater respiratory system compliance after returning to the supine position. Time from ARDS to PPV and baseline lung injury score were negatively associated, whereas chest wall compliance, heart rate, and PaCO2 were positively associated with sustained improvement in oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: PPV induced acute and sustained improvement in oxygenation in many patients with ARDS. The sustained improvement is more significant if PPV is administered early to patients with a larger shunt and a more compliant chest wall. Measuring venous admixture and chest wall compliance before PPV may help select a subgroup of patients with ARDS who may benefit the most from PPV.     

Respiratory variation of intra-abdominal pressure: indirect indicator of abdominal compliance?

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the observed respiratory cycle-related variation in intra-abdominal pressure is reliably quantifiable and a possible indirect indicator of abdominal compliance. Secondary issues were to assess the roles played by respiratory parameters in determining this oscillation and by patients' position in increasing their intra-abdominal pressure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a 26-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Sixteen consecutive patients admitted to intensive care for at least 24 h, requiring mechanical ventilation and intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intra-abdominal pressure was measured with a modified Kron technique; its waveform was recorded and inspiratory and expiratory values were measured during five consecutive respiratory cycles for 5 days, both in the supine and the 30 degrees head-up position. Inspiratory values were significantly higher than expiratory values (p = 0.001) and a correlation was found between their difference and intra-abdominal pressure basal values (p = 0.025). A positive linear relationship was shown between intra-abdominal pressure and the amplitude of its oscillation (r = 0.4), particularly in the subgroup of patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (r = 0.9). Intra-abdominal pressure was lower in patients supine than in the 30 degrees head-up position (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory cycle-related variations in intra-abdominal pressure were specifically investigated, quantified and shown as linearly increasing with end-expiratory intra-abdominal pressure; this phenomenon could be explained by patients' abdominal compliance status. Supine posture should be an important consideration in specific patients affected by intra-abdominal hypertension.     

Mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: recruitment and high positive end-expiratory pressure are necessary

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review as best the critical care clinicians can recruit the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) lungs and keep the lungs opened, assuring homogeneous ventilation, and to present the experimental and clinical results of these mechanical ventilation strategies, along with possible improvements in patient outcome based on selected published medical literature from 1972 to 2004 (highlighting the period from June 2003 to June 2004 and recent results of the authors' group research). RECENT FINDINGS: In the experimental setting, repeated derecruitments accentuate lung injury during mechanical ventilation, whereas open lung concept strategies can attenuate lung injury. In the clinical setting, recruitment maneuvers improve short-term oxygenation in ARDS patients. A recent prospective clinical trial showed that low versus intermediate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (8 vs 13 cm H2O) associated with low tidal ventilation had the same effect on ARDS patient survival. Nevertheless, both conventional and electrical impedance thoracic tomography studies indicate that stepwise PEEP recruitment maneuvers increase lung volume and the recruitment percentage of lung tissue, and higher levels of PEEP (18-26 cm H2O) are necessary to keep the ARDS lungs opened and assure a more homogeneous low tidal ventilation. SUMMARY: Stepwise PEEP recruitment maneuvers can open collapsed ARDS lungs. Higher levels of PEEP are necessary to maintain the lungs open and assure homogenous ventilation in ARDS. In the near future, thoracic CT associated with high-performance monitoring of regional ventilation (electrical impedance tomography) may be used at the bedside to determine the optimal mechanical ventilation of ARDS patients.     

Frequency dependence of flow resistance in patients with obstructive lung disease

Total respiratory, pulmonary, and chest wall flow resistances were determined by means of forced pressure and flow oscillations (3-9 cps) superimposed upon spontaneous breathing in a group of patients with varying degrees of obstructive lung disease. Increased total respiratory and pulmonary resistances were found, whereas the chest wall resistance was normal or subnormal. The total respiratory and pulmonary resistances decreased with increasing frequencies. Static compliance of the lung was measured during interrupted slow expiration, and dynamic compliance was measured during quiet and rapid spontaneous breathing. Compliance was found to be frequency-dependent. The frequency dependence of resistance and compliance are interpreted as effects of uneven distribution of the mechanical properties in the lungs. The practical application of the oscillatory technique to the measurement of flow resistance in patients with lung disease is discussed. Measurements of total respiratory resistance by the forced oscillatory technique at frequencies less than 5 cps appear to be as useful for assessing abnormalities in airway resistance as either the plethysmographic or esophageal pressure techniques.     

Central venous versus esophageal pressure changes for calculation of lung compliance during mechanical ventilation

Esophageal and CVP changes were measured simultaneously during mechanical ventilation in 12 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The results of these measurements were different and showed no correlation. Values of transpulmonary pressure changes and calculated lung compliances correlated well, because of the higher airway pressure changes. It is concluded, therefore, that measurements of esophageal and CVP changes are equally well suited for these calculations. For practical purposes, there is no need to measure a representant of intrapleural pressure changes, because during mechanical ventilation total static compliance calculations can be used to monitor changes in lung compliance, provided the thoracic cage compliance is not reduced substantially and does not change during the course of the studies. Clinical awareness of factors influencing thoracic cage compliance is important. The difference in transpulmonary and transthoracic pressure relationships during mechanical ventilation and during spontaneous breathing is emphasized. In spontaneous breathing, intrapleural pressure changes are determined primarily by the elastic properties of the lungs; in mechanical ventilation, on the other hand, by the elastic properties of the thoracic cage.     

Ventilator strategies for posttraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation and the role of spontaneous breathing in critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients who experience severe trauma are at increased risk for the development of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The management strategies used to treat respiratory failure in this patient population should be comprehensive. Current trends in the management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome consist of maintaining acceptable gas exchange while limiting ventilator-associated lung injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, two distinct forms of ventilator-associated lung injury are recognized to produce alveolar stress failure and have been termed low-volume lung injury (intratidal alveolar recruitment and derecruitment) and high-volume lung injury (alveolar stretch and overdistension). Pathologically, alveolar stress failure from low- and high-volume ventilation can produce lung injury in animal models and is termed ventilator-induced lung injury. The management goal in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome challenges clinicians to achieve the optimal balance that both limits the forms of alveolar stress failure and maintains effective gas exchange. The integration of new ventilator modes that include the augmentation of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation may be beneficial and may improve the ability to attain these goals. SUMMARY: Airway pressure release ventilation is a mode of mechanical ventilation that maintains lung volume to limit intra tidal recruitment /derecruitment and improves gas exchange while limiting over distension. Clinical and experimental data demonstrate improvements in arterial oxygenation, ventilation-perfusion matching (less shunt and dead space ventilation), cardiac output, oxygen delivery, and lower airway pressures during airway pressure release ventilation. Mechanical ventilation with airway pressure release ventilation permits spontaneous breathing throughout the entire respiratory cycle, improves patient comfort, reduces the use of sedation, and may reduce ventilator days.     

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory failure with and without intra-abdominal hypertension: a pilot study

Introduction  

To investigate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP < 12 mmHg) and with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg) during lung protective ventilation and a decremental PEEP, a prospective, observational clinical pilot study was performed.     

Matching positive end-expiratory pressure to intra-abdominal pressure improves oxygenation in a porcine sick lung model of intra-abdominal hypertension

Introduction

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) causes atelectasis, reduces lung volumes and increases respiratory system elastance. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in the setting of IAH and healthy lungs improves lung volumes but not oxygenation. However, critically ill patients with IAH often suffer from acute lung injury (ALI). This study, therefore, examined the respiratory and cardiac effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in an animal model of IAH, with sick lungs.

Methods

Nine pigs were anesthetized and ventilated (48 +/- 6 kg). Lung injury was induced with oleic acid. Three levels of intra-abdominal pressure (baseline, 18, and 22 mmHg) were randomly generated. At each level of intra-abdominal pressure, three levels of PEEP were randomly applied: baseline (5 cmH₂O), moderate (0.5 × intra-abdominal pressure), and high (1.0 × intra-abdominal pressure). We measured end-expiratory lung volumes, arterial oxygen levels, respiratory mechanics, and cardiac output 10 minutes after each new IAP and PEEP setting.

Results

At baseline PEEP, IAH (22 mmHg) decreased oxygen levels (-55%, P <0.001) and end-expiratory lung volumes (-45%, P = 0.007). At IAP of 22 mmHg, moderate and high PEEP increased oxygen levels (+60%, P = 0.04 and +162%, P <0.001) and end-expiratory lung volume (+44%, P = 0.02 and +279%, P <0.001) and high PEEP reduced cardiac output (-30%, P = 0.04). Shunt and dead-space fraction inversely correlated with oxygen levels and end-expiratory lung volumes. In the presence of IAH, lung, chest wall and respiratory system elastance increased. Subsequently, PEEP decreased respiratory system elastance by decreasing chest wall elastance.

Conclusions

In a porcine sick lung model of IAH, PEEP matched to intra-abdominal pressure led to increased lung volumes and oxygenation and decreased chest wall elastance shunt and dead-space fraction. High PEEP decreased cardiac output. The study shows that lung injury influences the effects of IAH and PEEP on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. Our findings support the application of PEEP in the setting of acute lung injury and IAH.     

How to ventilate patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this paper is to review the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury as a basis for providing the less damaging mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. RECENT FINDINGS: In normal lungs, high tidal volume causes an immediate gene upregulation and downregulation. Although the importance of alveolar inflammatory reaction is well known, recent findings suggest the potential role of airway distension in causing ventilator-induced lung injury. The initial activation has been shown to occur in the airways, accounting for the damages induced by high peak flow. The healthier lung regions are more exposed to the injury, since they may be subjected to strain. Challenge with endotoxin enhances in a synergistic manner the pulmonary inflammation induced by mechanical ventilation. However, mechanical strain and endotoxin seem to trigger lung inflammation through two different pathways. Despite convincing experimental and clinical evidences of lung injury, the clinical implementation of low tidal volume ventilation is still limited and has not yet become part of standard clinical practice. Setting positive end-expiratory pressure remains an open problem because the ALVEOLI study did not provide any exhaustive answers, likely because of methodologic problems and, unphysiologic design. SUMMARY: Gentle lung ventilation must be standard practice. Because stress and strain are the triggers of ventilator-induced lung injury, their clinical equivalents should be measured (transpulmonary pressure and the ratio between tidal volume and end-expiratory lung volume). For a rational application of positive end-expiratory pressure, the potential for recruitment in any single patient should be estimated.     

Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?

Prone ventilation (PV) is a ventilatory strategy that frequently improves oxygenation and lung mechanics in critical illness, yet does not consistently improve survival. While the exact physiologic mechanisms related to these benefits remain unproven, one major theoretical mechanism relates to reducing the abdominal encroachment upon the lungs. Concurrent to this experience is increasing recognition of the ubiquitous role of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in critical illness, of the relationship between IAH and intra-abdominal volume or thus the compliance of the abdominal wall, and of the potential difference in the abdominal influences between the extrapulmonary and pulmonary forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome. The present paper reviews reported data concerning intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in association with the use of PV to explore the potential influence of IAH. While early authors stressed the importance of gravitationally unloading the abdominal cavity to unencumber the lung bases, this admonition has not been consistently acknowledged when PV has been utilized. Basic data required to understand the role of IAP/IAH in the physiology of PV have generally not been collected and/or reported. No randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses considered IAH in design or outcome. While the act of proning itself has a variable reported effect on IAP, abundant clinical and laboratory data confirm that the thoracoabdominal cavities are intimately linked and that IAH is consistently transmitted across the diaphragm - although the transmission ratio is variable and is possibly related to the compliance of the abdominal wall. Any proning-related intervention that secondarily influences IAP/IAH is likely to greatly influence respiratory mechanics and outcomes. Further study of the role of IAP/IAH in the physiology and outcomes of PV in hypoxemic respiratory failure is thus required. Theories relating inter-relations between prone positioning and the abdominal condition are presented to aid in designing these studies.     

Dynamic versus static respiratory mechanics in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVES: It is not clear whether the mechanical properties of the respiratory system assessed under the dynamic condition of mechanical ventilation are equivalent to those assessed under static conditions. We hypothesized that the analyses of dynamic and static respiratory mechanics provide different information in acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Prospective multiple-center study. SETTING: Intensive care units of eight German university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Dynamic respiratory mechanics were determined during ongoing mechanical ventilation with an incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) protocol with PEEP steps of 2 cm H2O every ten breaths. Static respiratory mechanics were determined using a low-flow inflation. MAIN RESULTS: The dynamic compliance was lower than the static compliance. The difference between dynamic and static compliance was dependent on alveolar pressure. At an alveolar pressure of 25 cm H2O, dynamic compliance was 29.8 (17.1) mL/cm H2O and static compliance was 59.6 (39.8) mL/cm H2O (median [interquartile range], p < .05). End-inspiratory volumes during the incremental PEEP trial coincided with the static pressure-volume curve, whereas end-expiratory volumes significantly exceeded the static pressure-volume curve. The differences could be attributed to PEEP-related recruitment, accounting for 40.8% (10.3%) of the total volume gain of 1964 (1449) mL during the incremental PEEP trial. Recruited volume per PEEP step increased from 6.4 (46) mL at zero end-expiratory pressure to 145 (91) mL at a PEEP of 20 cm H2O (p < .001). Dynamic compliance decreased at low alveolar pressure while recruitment simultaneously increased. Static mechanics did not allow this differentiation. The decrease in static compliance occurred at higher alveolar pressures compared with the dynamic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Exploiting dynamic respiratory mechanics during incremental PEEP, both compliance and recruitment can be assessed simultaneously. Based on these findings, application of dynamic respiratory mechanics as a diagnostic tool in ventilated patients should be more appropriate than using static pressure-volume curves.     

Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury

Respiratory dysfunction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in spinal cord injury (SCI), which causes impairment of respiratory muscles, reduced vital capacity, ineffective cough, reduction in lung and chest wall compliance, and excess oxygen cost of breathing due to distortion of the respiratory system. Severely affected individuals may require assisted ventilation, which can cause problems with speech production. Appropriate candidates can sometimes be liberated from mechanical ventilation by phrenic-nerve pacing and pacing of the external intercostal muscles. Partial recovery of respiratory-muscle performance occurs spontaneously. The eventual vital capacity depends on the extent of spontaneous recovery, years since injury, smoking, a history of chest injury or surgery, and maximum inspiratory pressure. Also, respiratory-muscle training and abdominal binders improve performance of the respiratory muscles. For patients on long-term ventilation, speech production is difficult. Often, practitioners are reluctant to deflate the tracheostomy tube cuff to allow speech production. Yet cuff-deflation can be done safely. Standard ventilator settings produce poor speech quality. Recent studies demonstrated vast improvement with long inspiratory time and positive end-expiratory pressure. Abdominal binders improve speech quality in patients with phrenic-nerve pacers. Recent data show that the level and completeness of injury and older age at the time of injury may not be related directly to mortality in SCI, which suggests that the care of SCI has improved. The data indicate that independent predictors of all-cause mortality include diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cigarette smoking, and percent-of-predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second. An important clinical problem in SCI is weak cough, which causes retention of secretions during infections. Methods for secretion clearance include chest physical therapy, spontaneous cough, suctioning, cough assistance by forced compression of the abdomen ("quad cough"), and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. Recently described but not yet available for general use is activation of the abdominal muscles via an epidural electrode placed at spinal cord level T9-L1.     

How to set positive end-expiratory pressure

Application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute lung injury patients under mechanical ventilation improves oxygenation and increases lung volume. The effect of PEEP is to recruit lung tissue in patients with diffuse lung edema. This effect is particularly important in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes. Measurement of respiratory system mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is important to assess the status of the disease and to choose appropriate ventilator settings that provide maximum alveolar recruitment while avoiding overdistention. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in whom the lungs have been near-optimally recruited by PEEP and tidal volume, the use of recruitment maneuvers as adjuncts to mechanical ventilation remains controversial. The application of PEEP in patients with unilateral lung disease may be detrimental if PEEP hyperinflates normal lung regions, thus directing blood flow to diseased lung regions. In patients with air flow limitation and lung hyperinflation, the application of additional external PEEP to compensate for intrinsic PEEP and flow limitation frequently decreases the inspiratory effort to initiate an assisted breath, thus decreasing breathing work load.     

双水平无创正压通气在重症急性胰腺炎肺损伤的应用与护理体会

目的：探讨双水平无创正压通气在重症急性胰腺炎并发肺损伤患者中的应用效果及护理。方法：回顾性分析20例重症急性胰腺炎并发肺损伤患者的临床资料,给予积极对症治疗的同时进行双水平无创正压通气,观察其应用效果。结果：20例均成功撤机,无1例死亡,无1例进展成呼吸窘迫综合征及多器官功能衰竭综合征。结论：双水平无刨正压通气由于提供了气道正压通气且无需气管插管或切开．较有刨正压通气更易早期实施。早期治疗原发病、机械通气的应用及精心的护理,是抢救成功的关键。