文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症临床观察

文拉法辛缓释剂(商品名:怡诺思)治疗抑郁症门诊患者的疗效和不良反应,报告如下. 1 对象和方法 为2005年1至6月我院门诊患者,符合美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版的重性抑郁发作的诊断标准;入组前抑郁症患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD,17项)总分≥25分.     

文拉法辛缓释剂与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的对照研究

目的:探讨文拉法辛缓释剂和帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症(MD)的疗效和安全性。方法:将57例MD患者随机分为文拉法辛缓释剂组(28例)和帕罗西汀组(29例),并给予相应的药物治疗6周。分别于治疗前、治疗后3、7、10、14 d及6周应用汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项(HRSD)进行评定;治疗3、7、10及14 d应用治疗过程中出现的症状量表(TESS)评估药物不良反应。结果:治疗14 d分组与时间存在交互作用(F=6.608,P=0.001)。文拉法辛缓释剂组治疗第7 d起、帕罗西汀组治疗第10 d起HRSD评分较治疗前明显下降(P均0.01);治疗7及14 d文拉法辛缓释剂组HRSD评分明显低于帕罗西汀组(P均0.01);6周后两组间疗效及药物不良反应率差异无统计学意义。结论:与帕罗西汀相比,文拉法辛缓释剂治疗MD起效快,但疗效和不良反应相当。     

文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症急性期患者临床疗效的开放性研究

目的 评价5-羟色胺及去甲肾上腺素双重再摄取抑制剂文拉法辛缓释剂治疗抑郁症急性期门诊患者的临床疗效。方法 对11所医院的217例抑郁症急性期门诊患者予以文拉法辛缓释剂治疗，75mg／d，疗程共8周，治疗前后采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分观察疗效，以及观察相关实验室检查及记录不良反应。结果 文拉法辛缓释剂治疗急性期门诊抑郁症的临床治愈率和总有效率分别为60.4％和89.4％，HAMD和HAMA治疗前后的减分率分别为76．7％和77.1％；不良反应出现率为27.2％，其中89.6％的患者的不良反应在疗程结束时消失。结论 文拉法辛缓释剂能有效缓解抑郁和焦虑症状，对大多数门诊抑郁症患者在急性期治疗后能达到临床治愈，并有较好的耐受性和依从性。     

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗无效抑郁症患者换用文拉法辛与锂强化治疗的对照研究

目的:比较文拉法辛与碳酸锂强化治疗对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗无效的抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性. 方法:将SSRI治疗无效的抑郁症患者随机分为两组,分别予文拉法辛替换SSRI治疗和加用碳酸锂强化治疗.在治疗前及治疗1、2、4、8周采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分评定临床疗效.采用治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定药物安全性. 结果:文拉法辛组治疗痊愈率为51.1％,锂强化组治疗痊愈率为28.9％,两组痊愈率差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论:SSRI治疗无效的抑郁症患者换用文拉法辛的疗效优于碳酸锂强化治疗.     

文拉法辛对5-羟色胺再回收抑制剂治疗无效的抑郁症疗效观察

本文用文拉法辛治疗对5-羟色胺再回收抑制剂(SSRI)无效的抑郁症,并对其疗效和安全性进行观察,报告如下。1对象和方法为2008年1月至2010年12月我院符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版抑郁发作的诊断标准;汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评分≥18分;首次治疗采用1种SSRI类抗     

文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗无效的抑郁症患者的疗效

目的研究文拉法辛对选择性5羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗无效的抑郁症患者的治疗效果。方法对经SSRI治疗8周而无明显疗效的34例抑郁症患者以文拉法辛治疗6周(研究组),剂量为(100±20)mg/d。在文拉法辛治疗前及治疗后第1,2,4,6周末评定汉密尔顿抑郁量表(17项,HAMD),并进行临床疗效评定,监测血压,记录不良反应。选择同期门诊34例年龄、诊断与研究组相匹配的患者作为对照组,给予文拉法辛治疗6周,剂量为(99±25)mg/d。结果两组患者的HAMD评分均从第1周末起明显下降(P<005或P<001),且一直持续至治疗第6周末。研究组治疗第6周末的有效率达68%(23/34),临床治愈率达53%(18/34);对照组分别为77%(26/34)和59%(20/34)。两组间的差异无统计学意义(P>005)。研究组口干、恶心、呕吐的发生率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。结论文拉法辛对SSRI治疗8周而无明显疗效的抑郁症患者有较好的疗效。     

文拉法辛缓释剂与氯米帕明治疗门诊抑郁症患者的比较

目的评价文拉法辛缓释剂(怡诺思)与氯米帕明(安拿芬尼)治疗门诊抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法将80例抑郁症门诊患者依就诊顺序随机分为两组，分别给予文拉法辛缓释剂(n=42)和氯米帕明(n=38)治疗，在2周内逐步增高剂量至150mg／d，在治疗前后用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果文拉法辛缓释剂与氯米帕明对抑郁症的治疗疗效相近，但前者起效更快，不良反应少于后者。结论文拉法辛缓释剂是安全、有效、依从性好、不良反应较少的新一代抗抑郁药。     

文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗老年抑郁症的疗效对照研究

文拉法新是5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂（SNRI）类双受体作用的抗抑郁剂,对抨郁症有较好疗效,引。我们试用该药治疗老年抑郁症,并与氟西汀进行对照研究。现报道如下：     

文拉法辛缓释剂和帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的对照研究

目的 比较文拉法辛缓释剂与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法 96例抑郁症患者,分为文拉法辛组48例,用文拉法辛缓释剂75～150 mg/d;帕罗西汀组48例,用帕罗西汀20～40mg/d,观察期6周,疗效评定用HAMD,HAMA。不良反应评价用TESS、实验室检查及体检。结果 经过6周治疗,文拉法辛组有效率为79.17％,帕罗西汀组为75.00％,2组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。同时,文拉法辛缓释剂的抗抑郁作用起效较快,对焦虑症状的疗效优于帕罗西汀(P<0.01)。文拉法辛缓释剂不良反应轻,常见的有:口干、便秘、视力模糊、出汗、食欲减退等。结论 文拉法辛缓释剂是一种安全、有效、抗焦虑疗效好的抗抑郁药。     

文拉法辛缓释剂与速释剂治疗抑郁症对照研究

目的：比较文拉法辛缓释剂（XR）与速释剂（IR）治疗抑郁症的疗效及不良反应。方法：对门诊及住院抑郁症患者60例随机分为两组,分别给予文拉法辛缓释剂或速释剂治疗12周。治疗前后给予汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评定疗效,副反应量表（TESS）评定不良反应。结果：缓释剂组显效率为86．6％,速释剂组显效率为83．3％。治疗后HAMD和HAMA评分均有显著减少。结论：与速释剂相比,缓释剂能有效的缓解抑郁、焦虑症状,且有较好的耐受性和依从性。     

Treatment of severe depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are recognized as effective as and better tolerated than older antidepressant therapies and have become the drugs of choice in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. However, there is a clinical impression that the SSRIs are less effective than older therapies in the severely depressed patient. A limited number of trials have attempted to address this issue. This review assesses 16 controlled studies of SSRIs in severe depression. The findings from a majority of studies found the SSRIs to be superior to placebo and as effective as but better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in severely depressed patients. Although future studies are needed to corroborate and elaborate on these data, studies still support the use of SSRIs in this patient population. Depression and Anxiety 4:182–189, 1996/1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

TOPIC: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) has reentered the spotlight following the FDA's recent approval of fluoxetine hydrochloride to treat its symptoms. Although the diagnosis and treatment of PMDD has long been a source of contention, the FDA move has heightened the debate over this diagnostic category and the most appropriate treatment. PURPOSE: To explore several diagnoses related to PMDD and review recent research findings pertaining to the effectiveness of SSRIs to treat PMDD. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Published literature. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced practice nurses need to remain well informed about premenstrual conditions and emerging evidence-based treatment alternatives. In particular, they need to remember that the FDA has approved fluoxetine for the treatment of a very small subset of women with premenstrual complaints, among whom treatment efficacy is limited.     

Dose-response relationship of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors treatment-emergent hypomania in depressive disorders

Objective: The notion that antidepressant treatment‐associated hypomania or mania being pharmacologically induced has been challenged. To determine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) induced hypomania is secondary to medication effects, we examined the dose–response relationship of SSRI‐induced hypomania in two patients with depressive disorder. Method: Case study. Result: Hypomanic symptoms emerged during treatment with sertraline at the dose of 300 mg per day in a 45‐year‐old male with major depression. Paroxetine treatment at the dose of 80 mg per day induced hypomania in a 37‐year‐old female with dysthymia and trichitillomania. These patients have no family or personal history of bipolar disorder. Hypomania resolved when sertraline was decreased to 200 mg per day and paroxetine to 40 mg per day. No hypomanic switch was observed during 18–24 months follow‐up. Conclusion: In the absence of risk factors for manic switch, SSRI‐induced hypomania may be dose‐dependent medication effects.     

Hyponatraemia and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Part 1 describes the case of a 74-year-old woman who experienced a worsening of her psychiatric condition shortly after commencing fluoxetine and was found to have a low serum sodium level. The clinical features of hyponatraemia and its causes are reviewed. Part 2 reviews the reports of hyponatraemia and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and considers the variation in reports between the different SSRIs. Measurement of a patient's electrolytes is recommended if there is a rapid decline in mental state having started on an SSRI.     

Clinical predictors of response to pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical predictors of response to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in a sample of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A total of 55 patients diagnosed as OCD according to revised 3rd edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria underwent a 12-week standardized SSRI treatment. According to 'treatment response', defined as at least a 35% drop in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total score, OCD patients were divided into two groups. A total of 32 (58.2%) patients who responded to treatment and 23 (41.8%) who did not, were compared in terms of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The authors' findings demonstrated that the severity of obsession-compulsions and disability in work, social and family lives at the beginning of treatment were significantly higher in OCD patients who did not respond to treatment in comparison to those who did. Linear regression analysis, however, revealed that Sheehan Disability Scale-work score at baseline was a predictor of response to SSRI treatment. The higher levels of disability at the beginning of treatment in patients with OCD are associated with a poorer response to SSRI.     

5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂联合极化液治疗老年抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性

目的：评价5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂（SSRIs）联合极化液对老年抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法：69例符合国际疾病分类第10版抑郁发作诊断标准、年龄≥65岁的老年患者随机分为单用药组（单用SSRIs治疗）35例和合用药组（SSRIs＋极化液治疗）34例。疗程均为4周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD-17）,汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）和临床大体印象量表（CGI）评估疗效,治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评估不良事件。结果：治疗4周,以合用药组HAMA总分、HAMD总分显著下降低于单用药组（F=17．28,F=10．24;P均〈0．05）。合用药组CGI严重程度评分平均（1．5±O．4）分、TESS总分平均（9．4±1．2）分均显著低于单用药组（2．3±0．1）分和（10．5±3．5）分,差异有统计学意义（P均〈0．05）。结论：SSRIs联合极化液治疗老年抑郁症较单用SSRIs的疗效好,安全性高。